This paper investigates employing a nonlinear restoring force to improve the performance of flow energy harvesters (FEHs). To that end, a galloping FEH possessing a quartic potential energy function of the form V=12μy2+14γy4 is considered. This potential function is used to model either a softening (μ > 0, γ < 0), hardening (μ > 0, γ > 0), or bi-stable (μ < 0, γ > 0) restoring force. A physics-based model of the harvester is obtained assuming piezoelectric transduction and a quasi-steady flow field. The model is validated against experimental data and used to obtain a closed-form solution of the response by employing a multiple scaling perturbation analysis using the Jacobi elliptic functions. The attained solution is subsequently used to investigate the influence of the nonlinearity on the performance of the harvester and to illustrate how to optimize the restoring force in order to maximize the output power for given design conditions and airflow parameters. Specifically, it is shown that for similar design parameters and equal magnitudes of μ, and γ, a bi-stable energy harvester outperforms all other configurations as long as the inter-well motions are activated. On the other hand, if the motion of the bi-stable harvester is limited to a single well, then a harvester incorporating a softening nonlinear restoring force outperforms all other configurations. Furthermore, when comparing two FEHs incorporating the same type of restoring force at the optimal load and similar values of μ, then the FEH with the smaller γ is shown to provide higher output power levels.

1.
M.
Bryant
and
E.
Garcia
, “
Energy harvesting: A key to wireless sensor nodes
,” in
Second International Conference on Smart Materials and Nanotechnology in Engineering
(
International Society for Optics and Photonics
,
2009
), pp.
74931W
74931W
.
2.
G. W.
Taylor
,
J. R.
Burns
,
S.
Kammann
,
W. B.
Powers
, and
T. R.
Welsh
, “
The energy harvesting eel: A small subsurface ocean/river power generator
,”
IEEE J. Oceanic Eng.
26
(
4
),
539
547
(
2001
).
3.
S.
Pobering
and
N.
Schwesinger
, “
A novel hydropower harvesting device
,” in
Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on MEMS, NANO and Smart Systems (ICMENS)
,
2004
, pp.
480
485
.
4.
A.
Erturk
,
W.
Vieira
,
C.
De Marqui
, Jr.
, and
D.
Inman
, “
On the energy harvesting potential of piezoaeroelastic systems
,”
Appl. Phys. Lett.
96
(
18
),
184103
(
2010
).
5.
H.
Jung
and
S.
Lee
, “
The experimental validation of a new energy harvesting system based on the wake galloping phenomenon
,”
Smart Mater. Struct.
20
(
5
),
055022
(
2011
).
6.
J.
Sirohi
and
R.
Mahadik
, “
Piezoelectric wind energy harvester for low-power sensors
,”
J. Intell. Mater. Syst. Struct.
22
,
2215
2228
(
2011
).
7.
J.
Sirohi
and
R.
Mahadik
, “
Harvesting wind energy using a galloping piezoelectric beam
,”
J. Vib. Acoust.
134
(
1
),
011009
(
2012
).
8.
M.
Bryant
and
E.
Garcia
, “
Modeling and testing of a novel aeroelastic flutter energy harvester
,”
J. Vib. Acoust.
133
(
1
),
011010
(
2011
).
9.
V. C.
Sousa
,
M.
de M Anicézio
,
C.
De Marqui
, Jr.
, and
A.
Erturk
, “
Enhanced aeroelastic energy harvesting by exploiting combined nonlinearities: Theory and experiment
,”
Smart Mater. Struct.
20
(
9
),
094007
(
2011
).
10.
A.
Barrero-Gil
,
G.
Alonso
, and
A.
Sanz-Andres
, “
Energy harvesting from transverse galloping
,”
J. Sound Vib.
329
(
14
),
2873
2883
(
2010
).
11.
J. M.
Kluger
,
F. C.
Moon
, and
R. H.
Rand
, “
Shape optimization of a blunt body vibro-wind galloping oscillator
,”
J. Fluids Struct.
40
,
185
200
(
2013
).
12.
H. D.
Akaydin
,
N.
Elvin
, and
Y.
Andreopoulos
, “
Wake of a cylinder: A paradigm for energy harvesting with piezoelectric materials
,”
Exp. Fluids
49
(
1
),
291
304
(
2010
).
13.
A.
Abdelkefi
,
M.
Hajj
, and
A. H.
Nayfeh
, “
Piezoelectric energy harvesting from transverse galloping of bluff bodies
,”
Smart Mater. Struct.
22
(
1
),
015014
(
2013
).
14.
Y.
Yang
,
L.
Zhao
, and
L.
Tang
, “
Comparative study of tip cross-sections for efficient galloping energy harvesting
,”
Appl. Phys. Lett.
102
(
6
),
064105
(
2013
).
15.
M. F.
Daqaq
,
R.
Masana
,
A.
Erturk
, and
D.
Quinn
, “
On the role of nonlinearities in vibratory energy harvesting: A critical review and discussion
,”
Appl. Mech. Rev.
66
(
4
),
040801
(
2014
).
16.
S.
Zhou
,
J.
Cao
,
A.
Erturk
, and
J.
Lin
, “
Enhanced broadband piezoelectric energy harvesting using rotatable magnets
,”
Appl. Phys. Lett.
102
(
17
),
173901
(
2013
).
17.
G. V.
Parkinson
and
J. D.
Smith
, “
The square prism as an aeroelastic non-linear oscillator
,”
Q. J. Mech. Appl. Math.
17
(
2
),
225
239
(
1964
).
18.
A.
Bibo
and
M. F.
Daqaq
, “
On the optimal performance and universal design curves of galloping energy harvesters
,”
Appl. Phys. Lett.
104
(
2
),
023901
(
2014
).
19.
A. H.
Nayfeh
,
Introduction to Perturbation Techniques
(
John Wiley & Sons
,
2011
).
20.
The limited range in the softening case results from the form of the restoring force considered. In this study, we considered a cubic restoring force with a negative nonlinear (cubic) coefficient to represent the softening case. This results in a potential energy function with a local minimum (node) at y0 = 0 and two global maxima (saddles) on either end of the node. As such, for some design parameters, the dynamic trajectories will escape the potential barrier resulting in a complete loss of stability.
You do not currently have access to this content.