We quantitatively compared film-level ferromagnetic resonance (FMR) measurements using standard vector network analyzer (VNA) techniques with device-level FMR measurements for both thermal FMR (T-FMR) and field-swept spin-torque FMR (FS-ST-FMR) techniques on magnetic tunnel junction (MTJ) thin films with in-plane magnetization. The film and FS-ST-FMR device determination of damping α are in agreement; however, α cannot be reliably determined by use of T-FMR device measurements due to bandwidth limitations. The device-level intercept of Hres vs. f is lower than film-level measurements of the effective magnetization (Meff) due to the demagnetizing field and exchange coupling of the patterned free layer. The intercept shows device-to-device variations due to a combination of size variation and local film variations. At the device level, the inhomogeneous broadening (ΔH0) is nearly zero, while in film-level measurements, μ0ΔH0 > 10 mT due to averaging of the local film variations detected explicitly in the intercept of Hres vs. f at the device level. These results suggest that continuous-film and FS-ST-FMR measurements on multiple devices can provide comparable information about thin-film Meff, α, and ΔH0 with minimal interpretation, but caution is necessary when using T-FMR to determine α or ΔH0.
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
28 February 2013
Research Article|
February 25 2013
Continuous-film vs. device-level ferromagnetic resonance in magnetic tunnel junction thin films
Eric R. Evarts;
Eric R. Evarts
Magnetics Group, Electromagnetics Division, National Institute of Standards and Technology
, 325 Broadway, Boulder, Colorado 80305, USA
Search for other works by this author on:
Matthew R. Pufall;
Matthew R. Pufall
Magnetics Group, Electromagnetics Division, National Institute of Standards and Technology
, 325 Broadway, Boulder, Colorado 80305, USA
Search for other works by this author on:
William H. Rippard
William H. Rippard
Magnetics Group, Electromagnetics Division, National Institute of Standards and Technology
, 325 Broadway, Boulder, Colorado 80305, USA
Search for other works by this author on:
J. Appl. Phys. 113, 083903 (2013)
Article history
Received:
January 11 2013
Accepted:
February 12 2013
Citation
Eric R. Evarts, Matthew R. Pufall, William H. Rippard; Continuous-film vs. device-level ferromagnetic resonance in magnetic tunnel junction thin films. J. Appl. Phys. 28 February 2013; 113 (8): 083903. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4793589
Download citation file:
Pay-Per-View Access
$40.00
Sign In
You could not be signed in. Please check your credentials and make sure you have an active account and try again.
Citing articles via
A step-by-step guide to perform x-ray photoelectron spectroscopy
Grzegorz Greczynski, Lars Hultman
Scaling effects on the microstructure and thermomechanical response of through silicon vias (TSVs)
Shuhang Lyu, Thomas Beechem, et al.
Related Content
Controlling and patterning the effective magnetization in Y3Fe5O12 thin films using ion irradiation
AIP Advances (December 2017)
Tunable magnon-photon coupling in a compensating ferrimagnet—from weak to strong coupling
Appl. Phys. Lett. (March 2017)
Ferromagnetic resonance and damping properties of CoFeB thin films as free layers in MgO-based magnetic tunnel junctions
J. Appl. Phys. (August 2011)
A technique for error estimation of linewidth and damping parameters extracted from ferromagnetic resonance measurements
J. Appl. Phys. (February 2015)
Precise determination of the spectroscopic g-factor by use of broadband ferromagnetic resonance spectroscopy
J. Appl. Phys. (December 2013)