Using an ensemble Monte-Carlo analysis, it is found that relaxing the constraint of identical barrier heights can result in an improved temperature performance. Exploiting this additional design degree of freedom, modified structures with non-uniform barrier heights are developed based on the current record temperature design. For an optimized structure with reduced diagonality, we predict an increase of 31 K for the maximum operating temperature. Furthermore, we develop improved designs with the same oscillator strength as for the reference design. Using a genetic algorithm for optimization, an improvement of the maximum operating temperature by 38 K is obtained. These results aim to show the potential of varying the barrier heigths for the design of high temperature performance terahertz quantum cascade lasers.
REFERENCES
1.
Q.
Hu
, B. S.
Williams
, S.
Kumar
, H.
Callebaut
, S.
Kohen
, and J. L.
Reno
, Semicond. Sci. Technol.
20
, 228
(2005
).2.
M. A.
Belkin
, J. A.
Fan
, S.
Hormoz
, F.
Capasso
, S. P.
Khanna
, M.
Lachab
, A. G.
Davies
, and E. H.
Linfield
, Opt. Express
16
, 3242
(2008
).3.
S.
Kumar
, Q.
Hu
, and J. L.
Reno
, Appl. Phys. Lett.
94
, 131105
(2009
).4.
S.
Fathololoumi
, E.
Dupont
, C. W. I.
Chan
, Z. R.
Wasilewski
, S. R.
Laframboise
, D.
Ban
, A.
Mátyás
, C.
Jirauschek
, Q.
Hu
, and H. C.
Liu
, Opt. Express
20
, 3866
(2012
).5.
C. W. I.
Chan
, S.
Fathololoumi
, E.
Dupont
, Z. R.
Wasilewski
, S. R.
Laframboise
, D.
Ban
, Q.
Hu
, and H. C.
Liu
, in the 11th International Conference on Intersubband Transitions in Quantum Wells
(Le Dune Resort, Badesi, Sardinia Italy, 2011
).6.
M. A.
Belkin
, F.
Capasso
, A.
Belyanin
, D. L.
Sivco
, A. Y.
Cho
, D. C.
Oakley
, C. J.
Vineis
, and G. W.
Turner
, Nat. Photonics
1
, 288
(2007
).7.
M. A.
Belkin
, F.
Capasso
, F.
Xie
, A.
Belyanin
, M.
Fischer
, A.
Wittmann
, and J.
Faist
, Appl. Phys. Lett.
92
, 201101
(2008
).8.
Q. Y.
Lu
, N.
Bandyopadhyay
, S.
Slivken
, Y.
Bai
, and M.
Razeghi
, Appl. Phys. Lett.
99
, 131106
(2011
).9.
R. W.
Adams
, A.
Vizbaras
, M.
Jang
, C.
Grasse
, S.
Katz
, G.
Boehm
, M. C.
Amann
, and M. A.
Belkin
, Appl. Phys. Lett.
98
, 151114
(2011
).10.
H.
Luo
, S. R.
Laframboise
, Z. R.
Wasilewski
, G. C.
Aers
, H. C.
Liu
, and J. C.
Cao
, Appl. Phys. Lett.
90
, 041112
(2007
).11.
M.
Wienold
, L.
Schrottke
, M.
Giehler
, R.
Hey
, W.
Anders
, and H. T.
Grahn
, Appl. Phys. Lett.
97
, 071113
(2010
).12.
G.
Scalari
, M. I.
Amanti
, M.
Fischer
, R.
Terazzi
, C.
Walther
, M.
Beck
, and J.
Faist
, Appl. Phys. Lett.
94
, 041114
(2009
).13.
J. C.
Shin
, M.
D’Souza
, Z.
Liu
, J.
Kirch
, L. J.
Mawst
, D.
Botez
, I.
Vurgaftman
, and J. R.
Meyer
, Appl. Phys. Lett.
94
, 201103
(2009
).14.
D. P.
Xu
, M.
D’Souza
, J. C.
Shin
, L. J.
Mawst
, and D.
Botez
, J. Cryst. Growth
310
, 2370
(2008
).15.
D.
Botez
, S.
Kumar
, J. C.
Shin
, L. J.
Mawst
, I.
Vurgaftman
, and J. R.
Meyer
, Appl. Phys. Lett.
97
, 071101
(2010
).16.
Y.
Bai
, N.
Bandyopadhyay
, S.
Tsao
, E.
Selcuk
, S.
Slivken
, and M.
Razeghi
, Appl. Phys. Lett.
97
, 251104
(2010
).17.
S.
Katz
, G.
Boehm
, and M.-C.
Amann
, Electron. Lett.
44
, 580
(2008
).18.
J.
Shin
, L.
Mawst
, D.
Botez
, I.
Vurgaftman
, and J.
Meyer
, Electron. Lett.
45
, 741
(2009
).19.
H.
Li
, S.
Katz
, G.
Boehm
, and M.-C.
Amann
, Appl. Phys. Lett.
98
, 131113
(2011
).20.
C.
Jirauschek
and P.
Lugli
, J. Appl. Phys.
105
, 123102
(2009
).21.
A.
Mátyás
, T.
Kubis
, P.
Lugli
, and C.
Jirauschek
, Physica E
42
, 2628
(2010
).22.
C.
Jirauschek
, A.
Mátyás
, and P.
Lugli
, J. Appl. Phys.
107
, 013104
(2010
).23.
R. C.
Iotti
, E.
Ciancio
and F.
Rossi
, Phys. Rev. B
72
, 125347
(2005
).24.
R.
Köhler
, R. C.
Iotti
, A.
Tredicucci
, and F.
Rossi
, Appl. Phys. Lett.
79
, 3920
(2001
).25.
H.
Callebaut
, S.
Kumar
, B. S.
Williams
, Q.
Hu
, and J. L.
Reno
, Appl. Phys. Lett.
83
, 207
(2003
).26.
H.
Callebaut
, S.
Kumar
, B. S.
Williams
, Q.
Hu
, and J. L.
Reno
, Appl. Phys. Lett.
84
, 645
(2004
).27.
C.
Jirauschek
, G.
Scarpa
, P.
Lugli
, M. S.
Vitiello
, and G.
Scamarcio
, J. Appl. Phys.
101
, 086109
(2007
).28.
X.
Gao
, D.
Botez
, and I.
Knezevic
, J. Appl. Phys.
101
, 063101
(2007
).29.
X.
Gao
, M.
D’Souza
, D.
Botez
, and I.
Knezevic
, J. Appl. Phys.
102
, 113107
(2007
).30.
J. T.
Lü
and J. C.
Cao
, Appl. Phys. Lett.
89
, 211115
(2006
).31.
H.
Li
, J. C.
Cao
, Y. J.
Han
, X. G.
Guo
, Z. Y.
Tan
, J. T.
Lü
, H.
Luo
, S. R.
Laframboise
, and H. C.
Liu
, J. Appl. Phys.
104
, 043101
(2008
).32.
C.
Jirauschek
, Appl. Phys. Lett.
96
, 011103
(2010
).33.
A.
Mátyás
, P.
Lugli
, and C.
Jirauschek
, J. Appl. Phys.
110
, 013108
(2011
).34.
C.
Jirauschek
, Opt. Express
18
, 25922
(2010
).35.
H.
Li
, J. C.
Cao
, and H. C.
Liu
, Semicond. Sci. Technol.
23
, 125040
(2008
).36.
A.
Mátyás
, M. A.
Belkin
, P.
Lugli
, and C.
Jirauschek
, Appl. Phys. Lett.
96
, 201110
(2010
).37.
R. C.
Iotti
and F.
Rossi
, Phys. Rev. Lett.
87
, 146603
(2001
).38.
H.
Callebaut
and Q.
Hu
, J. Appl. Phys.
98
, 104505
(2005
).39.
C.
Weber
, A.
Wacker
, and A.
Knorr
, Phys. Rev. B
79
, 165322
(2009
).40.
S.
Kumar
and Q.
Hu
, Phys. Rev. B
80
, 245316
(2009
).41.
R.
Terazzi
and J.
Faist
, New J. Phys.
12
, 033045
(2010
).42.
E.
Dupont
, S.
Fathololoumi
, and H. C.
Liu
, Phys. Rev. B
81
, 205311
(2010
).43.
C.
Weber
, F.
Banit
, S.
Butscher
, A.
Knorr
, and A.
Wacker
, Appl. Phys. Lett.
89
, 091112
(2006
).44.
A.
Wacker
, Phys. Rev. B
66
, 085326
(2002
).45.
T.
Kubis
, C.
Yeh
, P.
Vogl
, A.
Benz
, G.
Fasching
, and C.
Deutsch
, Phys. Rev. B
79
, 195323
(2009
).46.
T.
Schmielau
and M. F.
Pereira
, Appl. Phys. Lett.
95
, 231111
(2009
).47.
T.
Kubis
and P.
Vogl
, Phys. Rev. B
83
, 195304
(2011
).48.
The reported influence of the top contact layer in case of Au-Au waveguides is 15 K.4,5 Based on our EMC simulation at 180 K and 195 K, this corresponds to a loss of about 5.5 cm−1. However, the Drude model gives only a slight change of 1 cm−1.4,5 The strong effect of the top contact layer observed in the experiment could be due to diffusion of the dopants from this layer into the first few periods of the QCL, which limits the operation and increases the loss further (Refs. 4, 5, and 56).
49.
The QCL from Ref. 2 has a sheet doping density of 2.75 × 1010 cm−1 while the other structures have 3 × 1010 cm−1. For metal-metal waveguides, the resonator loss scales linearly with the doping. Based on EMC simulation results at 178 K, this corresponds to a reduction in resonator loss of about 3.5 cm−1 for the structure in Ref. 2, as compared to the other structures.
50.
The QCL published by Kumar and coworkers operated at a slightly higher frequency, i.e., lower waveguide loss by about 1.5 cm−1 estimated from Fig. 1 in Ref. 2.
51.
H.
Luo
, S.
Laframboise
, Z.
Wasilewski
, and H.
Liu
, Electron. Lett.
43
, 633
(2007
).52.
H.
Luo
, S.
Laframboise
, Z.
Wasilewski
, H.
Liu
, and J.
Cao
, Electron. Lett.
44
, 630
(2008
).53.
C.
Jirauschek
and P.
Lugli
, Phys. Status Solidi C
5
, 221
(2008
).54.
Y.
Chiu
, Y.
Dikmelik
, J. B.
Kurghin
, and C.
Gmachl
, in the 11th International Conference on Intersubband Transitions in Quantum Wells
(2011
).55.
C.
Jirauschek
, IEEE J. Quantum Electron.
45
, 1059
(2009
).56.
S.
Kumar
, “Development of Terahertz Quantum-Cascade Lasers
,” Ph.D. dissertation (Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, Massachusetts Institute of Technology
, Cambridge, MA, 2007
).© 2012 American Institute of Physics.
2012
American Institute of Physics
You do not currently have access to this content.
