Knowledge of the carrier mobility in silicon is of utmost importance for photovoltaic applications, as it directly influences the diffusion length and thereby the cell efficiency. Moreover, its value is needed for a correct quantitative evaluation of a variety of lifetime measurements. However, models that describe the carrier mobility in silicon are based on theoretical calculations or fits to experimental data in monocrystalline silicon. Multicrystalline (mc) silicon features crystal defects such as dislocations and grain boundaries, with the latter possibly leading to potential barriers through the trapping of charge carriers and thereby influencing the mobility, as shown, for example, by Maruska et al. [Appl. Phys. Lett. 36, 381 (1980)]. To quantify the mobilities in multicrystalline silicon, we performed Hall measurements in p-type mc-Si samples of various resistivities and different crystal structures and compared the data to majority carrier Hall mobilities in p-type monocrystalline floatzone (FZ) silicon. For lack of a model that provides reliable values of the Hall mobility in silicon, an empirical fit similar to existing models for conductivity mobilities is proposed based on Hall measurements of monocrystalline p-type FZ silicon. By comparing the measured Hall mobilities obtained from mc silicon with the corresponding Hall mobilities in monocrystalline silicon of the same resistivity, we found that the mobility reduction due to the presence of crystal defects in mc-Si ranges between 0% and 5% only. Mobility decreases of up to 30% as reported by Peter et al. [Proceedings of the 23rd European Photovoltaic Solar Energy Conference, Valencia, Spain, 1–5 September 2008], or even of a factor of 2 to 3 as detected by Palais et al. [Mater. Sci. Eng. B 102, 184 (2003)], in multicrystalline silicon were not observed.

1.
D. K.
Schroder
,
Semiconductor Material and Device Characterization
(
John Wiley & Sons
,
New York
,
1990
).
2.
N. D.
Arora
,
J. R.
Hauser
, and
D. J.
Roulston
,
IEEE Trans. Electron Devices
29
,
292
(
1982
).
3.
W. R.
Thurber
,
R. L.
Mattis
,
Y. M.
Liu
, and
J. J.
Filliben
,
J. Electrochem. Soc.
127
,
2291
(
1980
).
4.
W. R.
Thurber
,
R. L.
Mattis
,
Y. M.
Liu
, and
J. J.
Filliben
,
J. Electrochem. Soc.
127
,
1807
(
1980
).
5.
J. M.
Dorkel
and
P.
Leturcq
,
Solid-State Electron.
24
,
821
(
1981
).
6.
D. B. M.
Klaassen
,
Solid-State Electron.
35
,
953
(
1992
).
7.
D. M.
Caughey
and
R. E.
Thomas
,
Proc. IEEE
55
,
2192
(
1967
).
8.
T. I.
Kamins
,
J. Appl. Phys.
42
,
4357
(
1971
).
9.
J. Y. W.
Seto
,
J. Appl. Phys.
46
,
5247
(
1975
).
10.
G.
Hahn
,
P.
Geiger
,
D.
Sontag
,
P.
Fath
, and
E.
Bucher
,
Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells
74
,
57
(
2002
).
11.
D.
Sontag
,
G.
Hahn
,
P.
Geiger
,
P.
Fath
, and
E.
Bucher
,
Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells
72
,
533
(
2002
).
12.
O.
Palais
,
L.
Clerc
,
A.
Arcari
,
M.
Stemmer
, and
S.
Martinuzzi
,
Mater. Sci. Eng. B
102
,
184
(
2003
).
13.
S.
Dubois
,
O.
Palais
,
P. J.
Ribeyron
,
N.
Enjalbert
,
M.
Pasquinelli
, and
S.
Martinuzzi
,
J. Appl. Phys.
102
,
083525
(
2007
).
14.
K.
Peter
,
R.
Kopecek
,
A.
Soiland
, and
E.
Enebakk
, in
Proceedings of the 23rd European Photovoltaic Solar Energy Conference
,
Valencia, Spain
, 1–5 September 2008, p.
947
.
15.
A. W.
Stephens
and
M. A.
Green
,
J. Appl. Phys.
74
,
6212
(
1993
).
16.
C. H.
Seager
and
T. G.
Castner
,
J. Appl. Phys.
49
,
3879
(
1978
).
17.
G.
Baccarani
,
B.
Ricco
, and
G.
Spadini
,
J. Appl. Phys.
49
,
5565
(
1978
).
18.
G. E.
Pike
and
C. H.
Seager
,
J. Appl. Phys.
50
,
3414
(
1979
).
19.
H.
Nussbaumer
,
F. P.
Baumgartner
,
G.
Willeke
, and
E.
Bucher
,
J. Appl. Phys.
83
,
292
(
1998
).
20.
H. P.
Maruska
,
A. K.
Ghosh
,
A.
Rose
, and
T.
Feng
,
Appl. Phys. Lett.
36
,
381
(
1980
).
21.
A. K.
Ghosh
,
A.
Rose
,
H. P.
Maruska
,
D. J.
Eustace
, and
T.
Feng
,
Appl. Phys. Lett.
37
,
544
(
1980
).
22.
E. H.
Hall
,
Am. J. Math.
2
,
287
(
1879
).
23.
L. J.
van der Pauw
,
Philips Res. Rep.
13
,
1
(
1958
).
24.
J. F.
Lin
,
S. S.
Li
,
L. C.
Linares
, and
K. W.
Teng
,
Solid-State Electron.
24
,
827
(
1981
).
25.
F.
Szmulowicz
,
Phys. Rev. B
34
,
4031
(
1986
).
26.
W. R.
Thurber
,
R. L.
Mattis
,
Y. M.
Liu
, and
J. J.
Filliben
,
The Relationship Between Resistivity and Dopant Density for Phosphorus- and Boron-Doped Silicon
(
U.S. Department of Commerce National Bureau of Standards
,
Washington, D.C.
,
1981
).
27.
F.
Secco d’Aragona
,
J. Electrochem. Soc.
119
,
948
(
1972
).
You do not currently have access to this content.