Explosives play a significant role in human affairs; however, their behavior in circumstances other than intentional detonation is poorly understood. Accidents may have catastrophic consequences, especially if additional hazardous materials are involved. Abnormal ignition stimuli, such as impact, spark, friction, and heat may lead to a very violent outcome, potentially including detonation. An important factor influencing the behavior subsequent to abnormal ignition is the strength and inertia of the vessel confining the explosive, i.e., the near-field structural/mechanical environment, also known as confinement (inertial or mechanical). However, a comprehensive and quantified understanding of how confinement affects reaction violence does not yet exist. In the research discussed here, we have investigated a wide range of confinement conditions and related the explosive response to the fundamentals of the combustion process in the explosive. In our experiments, a charge of an octahydrotetranitrotetrazine-based plastic bonded explosive (PBX 9501) was loaded into a gun assembly having variable confinement conditions and subjected to a heating profile. The exploding charge breached the confinement and accelerated a projectile down the gun barrel. High bandwidth pressure and volume measurements were made and a first-law analysis was used to obtain enthalpy and power from the raw data. These results were then used to quantify reaction violence. Enthalpy change and power ranged from 01.8kJ and 012MW for 300 mg charges, respectively. Below a confinement strength of 20 MPa, violence was found to decline precipitously with decreasing confinement, while the violence for the heaviest confinement experiments was found to be relatively constant. Both pressure and pressurization rate were found to have critical values to induce and sustain violent reaction.

1.
W. C.
Davis
, in
Explosive Effects and Applications
, edited by
J. A.
Zukas
and
W. P.
Walters
(
Springer
,
New York
,
1998
), p.
1
.
3.
J. D.
Burlage
, Naval Aviation News, October
1967
;
4.
American National Red Cross
,
Texas City Explosion, April 16, 1947
(
Red Cross
,
Washington
,
1948
);
6.
C.
Hansen
,
Bull. At. Sci.
56
,
64
(
2000
).
7.
W. L.
Perry
,
P. M.
Dickson
,
G. R.
Parker
, and
B. W.
Asay
,
J. Appl. Phys.
97
,
023528
(
2005
).
8.
I. J.
Dagley
and
P.
Robert
,
Combust. Flame
106
,
428
(
1996
).
9.
P. M.
Dickson
,
B. W.
Asay
,
B. F.
Henson
, and
L. B.
Smilowitz
,
Proc. R. Soc. London, Ser. A
460
,
3447
(
2004
).
10.
S. K.
Chidester
,
C. M.
Tarver
, and
G.
Leroy
,
Combust. Flame
110
,
264
(
1997
).
11.
S. L.
Collignon
,
W. P.
Burgess
,
W. H.
Wilson
, and
K. D.
Gibson
,
Proc. for the Insensitive Munitions Tech. Symp.
,
1992
, p.
136
.
12.
H. L.
Berghout
,
S. F.
Son
,
C. B.
Skidmore
, and
D. J.
Idar
,
Thermochim. Acta
384
,
261
(
2002
).
13.
D.
Price
and
J. F.
Wehner
,
Combust. Flame
9
,
73
(
1965
).
14.
G. H.
McCall
,
W. L.
Bongianni
, and
G. A.
Miranda
,
Rev. Sci. Instrum.
56
,
1612
(
1985
).
15.
A. A.
Zenin
,
J. Propul. Power
11
,
752
(
1995
).
16.
P. M.
Howe
,
R.
Frey
,
B.
Taylor
, and
V.
Boyle
,
Proceedings of the Sixth Symposium (International) on Detonation
, ONR ACR-221,
1976
, pp.
11
19
.
17.
P. R.
Lee
, in
Explosive Effects and Applications
, edited by
J. A.
Zukas
and
W. P.
Walters
(
Springer
,
New York
,
1998
), p.
173
.
18.
P. D.
Peterson
,
J. T.
Mang
, and
B. W.
Asay
,
J. Appl. Phys.
97
,
093507
(
2005
).
19.
G. R.
Parker
,
P. D.
Peterson
,
B. W.
Asay
,
P. M.
Dickson
,
W. L.
Perry
,
B. F.
Henson
,
L. B.
Smilowitz
, and
M. R.
Oldenborg
,
Propellants, Explos., Pyrotech.
29
,
274
(
2004
).
20.
M. J.
Ward
,
S. F.
Son
, and
M. Q.
Brewster
,
Combust. Flame
114
,
556
(
1998
).
21.
L.
De Luca
, in
Fundamentals of Solid-Propellant Combustion
, Progress in Astronautics and Aeronautics Vol. 90, edited by
K. K.
Kuo
and
M.
Summerfield
(
American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics
,
New York
,
1984
), p.
661
.
You do not currently have access to this content.