The effective carrier mobility in HfO2-based n- and p-metal oxide semiconductor field-effect transistors and in their control SiO2 devices has been investigated as a function of temperature for three different silicon crystal orientations (100), (111), and (110). For both HfO2 and SiO2, the electron mobility is steadily reduced between these orientations, whereas the hole mobility exhibits the opposite trend. The mobility-temperature dependence follows a power law μμoTα, and the exponent α varies also systematically with Si orientation and carrier type. The main finding is the presence of two temperature ranges with specific exponent values α1 and α2 occurring only for holes and for the (100) and (111) orientations. This crossover with rising temperature is explained by the progressive scattering of Si light holes that form the first excited states above the heavy-hole ground state. The same observation in SiO2Si(100) points to scattering by acoustic phonons in bulk Si. In addition to the contribution of acoustic phonons, the systematic reduction of mobility in HfO2 devices as compared to SiO2 is attributed to remote soft optical phonon scattering. A detailed analysis allows us to determine the precise inversion charge density range (or effective electric field) where remote phonon scattering predominates.

1.
G. D.
Wilk
,
R. M.
Wallace
, and
J. M.
Anthony
,
J. Appl. Phys.
89
,
5243
(
2001
).
2.
E. P.
Gusev
 et al,
Tech. Dig. - Int. Electron Devices Meet.
2001
,
451
.
3.
K.
Torii
,
Y.
Shimamoto
,
S.
Saito
,
O.
Tonomura
,
M.
Hiratani
,
Y.
Manabe
,
M.
Caymax
, and
J. W.
Maes
,
Tech. Dig. of 2002 Symposium on VLSI Technology
, Honolulu, HI, 11–13 June 2002 (
Japan Society of Applied Physics
, Tokyo,
2002
), p.
188
.
4.
T.
Yamaguchis
,
R.
Iijima
,
T.
Ino
,
A.
Nishiyama
,
H.
Satake
, and
N.
Fukushima
,
Tech. Dig. - Int. Electron Devices Meet.
2002
,
621
.
5.
M. V.
Fischetti
,
D. A.
Neumayer
, and
E.
Cartier
,
J. Appl. Phys.
90
,
4587
(
2001
).
6.
Z.
Ren
,
M. V.
Fischetti
,
E. P.
Gusev
,
E. A.
Cartier
, and
M.
Chudzik
,
Tech. Dig. - Int. Electron Devices Meet.
2003
,
793
.
7.
W. J.
Zhu
and
T. P.
Ma
,
IEEE Electron Device Lett.
25
,
89
(
2004
).
8.
T.
Sato
,
Y.
Takeishi
,
H.
Hara
, and
Y.
Okamoto
,
Phys. Rev. B
4
,
1950
(
1971
).
9.
S.
Takagi
,
A.
Toriumi
,
M.
Iwase
, and
H.
Tango
,
IEEE Trans. Electron Devices
41
,
2357
(
1994
).
10.
M.
Kinigawa
,
M.
Kakumu
,
T.
Usami
, and
J.
Matsunaga
,
Tech. Dig. - Int. Electron Devices Meet.
1985
,
581
.
11.
H. S.
Momose
,
T.
Ohguro
,
S.
Nakamura
,
Y.
Toyoshima
,
H.
Ishiuchi
, and
H.
Iwai
,
IEEE Trans. Electron Devices
49
,
1597
(
2002
).
12.
M.
Yang
 et al,
IEEE Electron Device Lett.
24
,
339
(
2003
).
13.
M.
Yang
 et al,
Tech. Dig. - Int. Electron Devices Meet.
2003
,
453
.
14.
D. A.
Buchanan
 et al,
Tech. Dig. - Int. Electron Devices Meet.
2000
,
223
.
15.
W. J.
Zhu
,
J.-P.
Han
, and
T. P.
Ma
,
IEEE Trans. Electron Devices
51
,
98
(
2004
).
16.
K.
Seeger
,
Semiconductor Physics
, 8th ed. (
Springer
,
Berlin Heidelberg
,
2002
).
17.
M. V.
Fischetti
,
Z.
Ren
,
P. M.
Solomon
,
M.
Yang
, and
K.
Rim
,
J. Appl. Phys.
94
,
1079
(
2003
).
18.
T.
Ando
,
A. B.
Fowler
, and
F.
Stern
,
Rev. Mod. Phys.
54
,
437
(
1982
).
19.
T.
Ando
,
J. Phys. Soc. Jpn.
43
,
1616
(
1977
).
20.
P. D.
Kirsch
 et al,
J. Appl. Phys.
99
,
023508
(
2006
).
You do not currently have access to this content.