We present a novel method for analyzing brain functional networks using functional magnetic resonance imaging data, which involves utilizing consensus networks. In this study, we compare our approach to a standard group-based method for patients diagnosed with major depressive disorder (MDD) and a healthy control group, taking into account different levels of connectivity. Our findings demonstrate that the consensus network approach uncovers distinct characteristics in network measures and degree distributions when considering connection strengths. In the healthy control group, as connection strengths increase, we observe a transition in the network topology from a combination of scale-free and random topologies to a small-world topology. Conversely, the MDD group exhibits uncertainty in weak connections, while strong connections display small-world properties. In contrast, the group-based approach does not exhibit significant differences in behavior between the two groups. However, it does indicate a transition in topology from a scale-free-like structure to a combination of small-world and scale-free topologies. The use of the consensus network approach also holds immense potential for the classification of MDD patients, as it unveils substantial distinctions between the two groups.
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
September 2023
Research Article|
September 15 2023
Topology switching during window thresholding fMRI-based functional networks of patients with major depressive disorder: Consensus network approach
Special Collection:
Regime switching in coupled nonlinear systems: sources, prediction, and control
Alexander N. Pisarchik
;
Alexander N. Pisarchik
a)
(Conceptualization, Formal analysis, Methodology, Writing – review & editing)
1
Baltic Center for Neurotechnology and Artificial Intelligence, Immanuel Kant Baltic Federal University
, 14, A. Nevskogo Str., Kaliningrad 236016, Russia
2
Center for Biomedical Technology, Universidad Politécnica de Madrid
, Campus Montegancedo, Pozuelo de Alarcón 28223, Spain
a)Author to whom correspondence should be addressed: [email protected]
Search for other works by this author on:
Andrey V. Andreev
;
Andrey V. Andreev
(Conceptualization, Investigation, Software, Validation, Visualization, Writing – original draft)
1
Baltic Center for Neurotechnology and Artificial Intelligence, Immanuel Kant Baltic Federal University
, 14, A. Nevskogo Str., Kaliningrad 236016, Russia
Search for other works by this author on:
Semen A. Kurkin
;
Semen A. Kurkin
(Conceptualization, Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Writing – review & editing)
1
Baltic Center for Neurotechnology and Artificial Intelligence, Immanuel Kant Baltic Federal University
, 14, A. Nevskogo Str., Kaliningrad 236016, Russia
Search for other works by this author on:
Drozdstoy Stoyanov
;
Drozdstoy Stoyanov
(Data curation, Investigation, Writing – review & editing)
3
Department of Psychiatry and Medical Psychology, Research Institute, Medical University Plovdiv
, 15A Vassil Aprilov Blvd., Plovdiv 4002, Bulgaria
Search for other works by this author on:
Artem A. Badarin
;
Artem A. Badarin
(Formal analysis, Software, Validation)
1
Baltic Center for Neurotechnology and Artificial Intelligence, Immanuel Kant Baltic Federal University
, 14, A. Nevskogo Str., Kaliningrad 236016, Russia
Search for other works by this author on:
Rossitsa Paunova
;
Rossitsa Paunova
(Data curation, Investigation, Resources, Validation)
3
Department of Psychiatry and Medical Psychology, Research Institute, Medical University Plovdiv
, 15A Vassil Aprilov Blvd., Plovdiv 4002, Bulgaria
Search for other works by this author on:
Alexander E. Hramov
Alexander E. Hramov
(Conceptualization, Formal analysis, Funding acquisition, Methodology, Supervision, Writing – review & editing)
1
Baltic Center for Neurotechnology and Artificial Intelligence, Immanuel Kant Baltic Federal University
, 14, A. Nevskogo Str., Kaliningrad 236016, Russia
Search for other works by this author on:
a)Author to whom correspondence should be addressed: [email protected]
Chaos 33, 093122 (2023)
Article history
Received:
July 03 2023
Accepted:
August 29 2023
Citation
Alexander N. Pisarchik, Andrey V. Andreev, Semen A. Kurkin, Drozdstoy Stoyanov, Artem A. Badarin, Rossitsa Paunova, Alexander E. Hramov; Topology switching during window thresholding fMRI-based functional networks of patients with major depressive disorder: Consensus network approach. Chaos 1 September 2023; 33 (9): 093122. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0166148
Download citation file:
Pay-Per-View Access
$40.00
Sign In
You could not be signed in. Please check your credentials and make sure you have an active account and try again.
Citing articles via
Ordinal Poincaré sections: Reconstructing the first return map from an ordinal segmentation of time series
Zahra Shahriari, Shannon D. Algar, et al.
Reliable detection of directional couplings using cross-vector measures
Martin Brešar, Ralph G. Andrzejak, et al.
Regime switching in coupled nonlinear systems: Sources, prediction, and control—Minireview and perspective on the Focus Issue
Igor Franović, Sebastian Eydam, et al.
Related Content
Toward interpretability of machine learning methods for the classification of patients with major depressive disorder based on functional network measures
Chaos (June 2023)
The role of nonlinearity in computing graph-theoretical properties of resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging brain networks
Chaos (March 2011)
The effect of functional magnetic resonance imaging connectivity on resting motor threshold transcranial magnetic stimulation in schizophrenia participants
AIP Advances (January 2024)
FMRI in Epilepsy
AIP Conference Proceedings (September 2004)
Activation Detection in fMRI Using Jeffrey Divergence
AIP Conference Proceedings (December 2009)