Connecting memristors into any neural circuit can enhance its potential controllability under external physical stimuli. Memristive current along a magnetic flux-controlled memristor can estimate the effect of electromagnetic induction on neural circuits and neurons. Here, a charge-controlled memristor is incorporated into one branch circuit of a simple neural circuit to estimate the effect of an external electric field. The field energy kept in each electric component is respectively calculated, and equivalent dimensionless energy function H is obtained to discern the firing mode dependence on the energy from capacitive, inductive, and memristive channels. The electric field energy HM in a memristive channel occupies the highest proportion of Hamilton energy H, and neurons can present chaotic/periodic firing modes because of large energy injection from an external electric field, while bursting and spiking behaviors emerge when magnetic field energy HL holds maximal proportion of Hamilton energy H. The memristive current is modified to control the firing modes in this memristive neuron accompanying with a parameter shift and shape deformation resulting from energy accommodation in the memristive channel. In the presence of noisy disturbance from an external electric field, stochastic resonance is induced in the memristive neuron. Exposed to stronger electromagnetic field, the memristive component can absorb more energy and behave as a signal source for energy shunting, and negative Hamilton energy is obtained for this neuron. The new memristive neuron model can address the main physical properties of biophysical neurons, and it can further be used to explore the collective behaviors and self-organization in networks under energy flow and noisy disturbance.
REFERENCES
1.
S. R.
Puiggros
and D.
Jabaudon
, “Light-dependent development is tailored in visual neurons
,” Nature
603
, 37
–38
(2022
). 2.
F.
Wu
, J.
Ma
, and G.
Zhang
, “Energy estimation and coupling synchronization between biophysical neurons
,” Sci. China Technol. Sci.
63
, 625
–636
(2020
). 3.
R. C.
Sotero
and N. J.
Trujillo-Barreto
, “Biophysical model for integrating neuronal activity, EEG, fMRI and metabolism
,” Neuroimage
39
, 290
–309
(2008
). 4.
E.
Av-Ron
, H.
Parnas
, and L. A.
Segel
, “A basic biophysical model for bursting neurons
,” Biol. Cybern.
69
, 87
–95
(1993
). 5.
J.
Oesterle
, C.
Behrens
, C.
Schröder
et al., “Bayesian inference for biophysical neuron models enables stimulus optimization for retinal neuroprosthetics
,” Elife
9
, e54997
(2020
). 6.
L. N.
Groschner
, J. G.
Malis
, B.
Zuidinga
et al., “A biophysical account of multiplication by a single neuron
,” Nature
603
, 119
–123
(2022
). 7.
M. E.
Tagluk
and I.
Isik
, “Communication in nano devices: Electronic based biophysical model of a neuron
,” Nano Commun. Netw.
19
, 134
–147
(2019
). 8.
M. Y.
Yim
, A.
Aertsen
, and S.
Rotter
, “Impact of intrinsic biophysical diversity on the activity of spiking neurons
,” Phys. Rev. E
87
, 032710
(2013
). 9.
Y.
Xie
, Z.
Yao
, X.
Hu
et al., “Enhance sensitivity to illumination and synchronization in light-dependent neurons
,” Chin. Phys. B
30
, 120510
(2021
). 10.
Y.
Liu
, W.
Xu
, J.
Ma
et al., “A new photosensitive neuron model and its dynamics
,” Front. Inf. Technol. Electron. Eng.
21
, 1387
–1396
(2020
). 11.
Y.
Xu
and J.
Ma
, “Control of firing activities in thermosensitive neuron by activating excitatory autapse
,” Chin. Phys. B
30
, 100501
(2021
). 12.
L.
Wiles
, S.
Gu
, F.
Pasqualetti
et al., “Autaptic connections shift network excitability and bursting
,” Sci. Rep.
7
, 44006
(2017
). 13.
C.
Yao
, Z.
He
, T.
Nakano
et al., “Inhibitory-autapse-enhanced signal transmission in neural networks
,” Nonlinear Dyn.
97
, 1425
–1437
(2019
). 14.
Y.
Guo
, P.
Zhou
, Z.
Yao
et al., “Biophysical mechanism of signal encoding in an auditory neuron
,” Nonlinear Dyn.
105
, 3603
–3614
(2021
). 15.
X.
Zhang
and J.
Ma
, “Wave filtering and firing modes in a light-sensitive neural circuit
,” J. Zhejiang Univ. Sci. A
22
, 707
–720
(2021
). 16.
Y.
Xie
and J.
Ma
, “How to discern external acoustic waves in a piezoelectric neuron under noise?
,” J. Biol. Phys.
48
, 339
–353
(2022
). 17.
Y.
Xie
, P.
Zhou
, Z.
Yao
et al., “Response mechanism in a functional neuron under multiple stimuli
,” Phys. A
607
, 128175
(2022
). 18.
Y.
Xie
, P.
Zhou
, and J.
Ma
, “Energy balance and synchronization via inductive-coupling in functional neural circuits
,” Appl. Math. Modell.
113
, 175
–187
(2023
). 19.
P.
Zhou
, X.
Zhang
, and J.
Ma
, “How to wake up the electric synapse coupling between neurons?
,” Nonlinear Dyn.
108
, 1681
–1695
(2022
). 20.
Y.
Wang
and J.
Ma
, “Creation of synaptic connection to memristive neurons under noise
,” Optik
270
, 170011
(2022
). 21.
Y.
Zhang
, Y.
Xu
, Z.
Yao
et al., “A feasible neuron for estimating the magnetic field effect
,” Nonlinear Dyn.
102
, 1849
–1867
(2020
). 22.
Y.
Zhang
, C. N.
Wang
, J.
Tang
et al., “Phase coupling synchronization of FHN neurons connected by a Josephson junction
,” Sci. China Technol. Sci.
63
, 2328
–2338
(2020
). 23.
Y.
Xu
, M.
Liu
, Z.
Zhu
et al., “Dynamics and coherence resonance in a thermosensitive neuron driven by photocurrent
,” Chin. Phys. B
29
, 098704
(2020
). 24.
Y.
Xu
and J.
Ma
, “Pattern formation in a thermosensitive neural network
,” Commun. Nonlinear Sci. Numer. Simul.
111
, 106426
(2022
). 25.
J. F.
Tagne
, H. C.
Edima
, Z. T.
Njitacke
et al., “Bifurcations analysis and experimental study of the dynamics of a thermosensitive neuron conducted simultaneously by photocurrent and thermistance
,” Eur. Phys. J. Spec. Top.
231
, 993
–1004
(2022
). 26.
Y.
Guo
, C.
Wang
, Z.
Yao
et al., “Desynchronization of thermosensitive neurons by using energy pumping
,” Phys. A
602
, 127644
(2022
). 27.
X.
Ma
and Y.
Xu
, “Taming the hybrid synapse under energy balance between neurons
,” Chaos, Solitons Fractals
159
, 112149
(2022
). 28.
H.
Yu
, X.
Guo
, and J.
Wang
, “Stochastic resonance enhancement of small-world neural networks by hybrid synapses and time delay
,” Commun. Nonlinear Sci. Numer. Simul.
42
, 532
–544
(2017
). 29.
A.
Calim
, J. J.
Torres
, M.
Ozer
et al., “Chimera states in hybrid coupled neuron populations
,” Neural Netw.
126
, 108
–117
(2020
). 30.
K.
Xu
, J. P.
Maidana
, and P.
Orio
, “Diversity of neuronal activity is provided by hybrid synapses
,” Nonlinear Dyn.
105
, 2693
–2710
(2021
). 31.
Z.
Yao
and C.
Wang
, “Collective behaviors in a multiple functional network with hybrid synapses
,” Physica A
605
, 127981
(2022
).32.
Z.
Yao
and C.
Wang
, “Control the collective behaviors in a functional neural network
,” Chaos, Solitons Fractals
152
, 111361
(2021
). 33.
P.
Zhou
, X.
Zhang
, X.
Hu
et al., “Energy balance between two thermosensitive circuits under field coupling
,” Nonlinear Dyn.
110
, 1879
–1895
(2022
). 34.
Z.
Yao
, C.
Wang
, P.
Zhou
et al., “Regulating synchronous patterns in neurons and networks via field coupling
,” Commun. Nonlinear Sci. Numer. Simul.
95
, 105583
(2021
). 35.
F. Q.
Wu
, J.
Ma
, and G.
Zhang
, “Energy estimation and coupling synchronization between biophysical neurons
,” Sci. China Technol. Sci.
63
, 625
–636
(2020
). 36.
H.
Bao
, Y.
Zhang
, W.
Liu
et al., “Memristor synapse-coupled memristive neuron network: Synchronization transition and occurrence of chimera
,” Nonlinear Dyn.
100
, 937
–950
(2020
). 37.
M.
Khalid
, “Review on various memristor models, characteristics, potential applications, and future works
,” Trans. Electr. Electron. Mater.
20
, 289
–298
(2019
). 38.
B.
Chen
, Q.
Xu
, M.
Chen
et al., “Initial-condition-switched boosting extreme multistability and mechanism analysis in a memcapacitive oscillator
,” Front. Inf. Technol. Electron. Eng.
22
, 1517
–1531
(2021
). 39.
M. J.
Sharifi
and Y. M.
Banadaki
, “General spice models for memristor and application to circuit simulation of memristor-based synapses and memory cells
,” J. Circuits Syst. Comput.
19
, 407
–424
(2010
). 40.
K.
Rajagopal
, S.
Kacar
, Z.
Wei
et al., “Dynamical investigation and chaotic associated behaviors of memristor Chua's circuit with a non-ideal voltage-controlled memristor and its application to voice encryption
,” AEU-Int. J. Electron. Commun.
107
, 183
–191
(2019
).41.
Y.
Zhang
, W.
He
, Y.
Wu
et al., “Highly compact artificial memristive neuron with low energy consumption
,” Small
14
, 1802188
(2018
). 42.
Y.
Babacan
, F.
Kaçar
, and K.
Gürkan
, “A spiking and bursting neuron circuit based on memristor
,” Neurocomputing
203
, 86
–91
(2016
). 43.
M. S.
Feali
, A.
Ahmadi
, and M.
Hayati
, “Implementation of adaptive neuron based on memristor and memcapacitor emulators
,” Neurocomputing
309
, 157
–167
(2018
). 44.
H.
Bao
, W.
Liu
, J.
Ma
et al., “Memristor initial-offset boosting in memristive HR neuron model with hidden firing patterns
,” Int. J. Bifurcat. Chaos
30
, 2030029
(2020
). 45.
F.
Wu
and H.
Gu
, “Bifurcations of negative responses to positive feedback current mediated by memristor in a neuron model with bursting patterns
,” Int. J. Bifurcat. Chaos
30
, 2030009
(2020
). 46.
L.
Zhao
, Q.
Hong
, and X.
Wang
, “Novel designs of spiking neuron circuit and STDP learning circuit based on memristor
,” Neurocomputing
314
, 207
–214
(2018
). 47.
Q.
Hong
, L.
Zhao
, and X.
Wang
, “Novel circuit designs of memristor synapse and neuron
,” Neurocomputing
330
, 11
–16
(2019
). 48.
Y.
Tan
and C.
Wang
, “A simple locally active memristor and its application in HR neurons
,” Chaos
30
, 053118
(2020
). 49.
L.
Xu
, G.
Qi
, and J.
Ma
, “Modeling of memristor-based Hindmarsh-Rose neuron and its dynamical analyses using energy method
,” Appl. Math. Modell.
101
, 503
–516
(2022
). 50.
F.
Wu
, X.
Hu
, and J.
Ma
, “Estimation of the effect of magnetic field on a memristive neuron
,” Appl. Math. Comput.
432
, 127366
(2022
). 51.
B. C.
Jang
, S.
Kim
, S. Y.
Yang
et al., “Polymer analog memristive synapse with atomic-scale conductive filament for flexible neuromorphic computing system
,” Nano Lett.
19
, 839
–849
(2019
). 52.
R.
Yang
, H. M.
Huang
, and X.
Guo
, “Memristive synapses and neurons for bioinspired computing
,” Adv. Electron. Mater.
5
, 1900287
(2019
). 53.
K.
Long
and X.
Zhang
, “Memristive-synapse spiking neural networks based on single-electron transistors
,” J. Comput. Electron.
19
, 435
–450
(2020
). 54.
S. H.
Sung
, T. J.
Kim
, H.
Shin
et al., “Simultaneous emulation of synaptic and intrinsic plasticity using a memristive synapse
,” Nat. Commun.
13
, 2811
(2022
). 55.
A.
Serb
, A.
Corna
, R.
George
et al., “Memristive synapses connect brain and silicon spiking neurons
,” Sci. Rep.
10
, 2590
(2020
). 56.
Y.
Guo
, Z.
Zhu
, C.
Wang
et al., “Coupling synchronization between photoelectric neurons by using memristive synapse
,” Optik
218
, 164993
(2020
). 57.
F.
Wu
, Y.
Zhang
, and X.
Zhang
, “Regulating firing rates in a neural circuit by activating memristive synapse with magnetic coupling
,” Nonlinear Dyn.
98
, 971
–984
(2019
). 58.
F.
Wu
, Y.
Guo
, and J.
Ma
, “Reproduce the biophysical function of chemical synapse by using a memristive synapse
,” Nonlinear Dyn.
109
, 2063
–2084
(2022
). 59.
M. S.
Kafraj
, F.
Parastesh
, and S.
Jafari
, “Firing patterns of an improved Izhikevich neuron model under the effect of electromagnetic induction and noise
,” Chaos, Solitons Fractals
137
, 109782
(2020
). 60.
N.
Zandi-Mehran
, S.
Jafari
, S.
Hashemi Golpayegani
et al., “Different synaptic connections evoke different firing patterns in neurons subject to an electromagnetic field
,” Nonlinear Dyn.
100
, 1809
–1824
(2020
). 61.
Z.
Guo
, H. H. C.
Iu
, G.
Si
et al., “A phasor analysis method for charge-controlled memory elements
,” Int. J. Bifurcat. Chaos
30
, 2030041
(2020
). 62.
S.
Wu
, X.
Rong
, and Z.
Liu
, “Study on how to design simplest chaotic circuit with two charge-controlled memristors
,” J. Syst. Simul.
30
, 3985
(2018
).63.
O.
Kavehei
, A.
Iqbal
, Y. S.
Kim
et al., “The fourth element: Characteristics, modelling and electromagnetic theory of the memristor
,” Proc. R. Soc. A: Math. Phys. Eng. Sci.
466
, 2175
–2202
(2010
).64.
A. A.
Gismatulin
, V. A.
Gritsenko
, T. J.
Yen
et al., “Charge transport mechanism in SiNx-based memristor
,” Appl. Phys. Lett.
115
, 253502
(2019
). 65.
D.
Biolek
, Z.
Kohl
, J.
Vavra
et al., “Mutual transformation of flux-controlled and charge-controlled memristors
,” IEEE Access
10
, 68307
–68318
(2022
). 66.
Z. P.
Tan
, H. J.
Yang
, Q. N.
Liu
et al., “Analysis and implementation of a simplest charge-controlled memristor chaotic circuit
,” Chin. J. Comput. Phys.
32
, 496
(2015
).67.
Y.
Liu
, H. H. C.
Iu
, Z.
Guo
et al., “The simple charge-controlled grounded/floating mem-element emulator
,” IEEE Trans. Circuits Syst. II: Express Br.
68
, 2177
–2181
(2020
). 68.
Z. Q.
Chen
, H.
Tang
, Z. L.
Wang
et al., “Design and circuit implementation for a novel charge-controlled chaotic memristor system
,” J. Appl. Anal. Comput.
5
, 251
–261
(2015
). 69.
A.
Isah
, A. S. T.
Nguetcho
, S.
Binczak
, et al., “Dynamics of a charge-controlled memristor in master-slave coupling
,” Electron. Lett.
56
, 211–213
(2020
).70.
K.
Bhardwaj
and M.
Srivastava
, “Compact charge-controlled memristance simulator with electronic/resistive tunability
,” J. Circuits Syst. Comput.
31
, 2250094
(2022
). 71.
I. M.
Kyprianidis
, V.
Papachristou
, I. N.
Stouboulos
et al., “Dynamics of coupled chaotic Bonhoeffer-van der Pol oscillators
,” WSEAS T Trans. Syst.
11
, 516
–526
(2012
).72.
D. H.
Kobe
, “Helmholtz's theorem revisited
,” Am. J. Phys.
54
, 552
–554
(1986
). 73.
P.
Zhou
, X.
Hu
, Z.
Zhu
et al., “What is the most suitable Lyapunov function?
,” Chaos, Solitons Fractals
150
, 111154
(2021
). 74.
J.
Ma
, Z.
Yang
, L.
Yang
et al., “A physical view of computational neurodynamics
,” J. Zhejiang Univ. Sci. A
20
, 639
–659
(2019
). 75.
J.
Ma
, “Chaos theory and applications: The physical evidence, mechanism are important in chaotic systems
,” Chaos Theory Appl.
4
, 1
–3
(2022
).76.
J.
Ma
, “Biophysical neurons, energy and synapse controllability: A review
,” J. Zhejiang Univ. Sci. A
(2022
). 77.
S.
Majhi
, M.
Perc
, and D.
Ghosh
, “Dynamics on higher-order networks: A review
,” J. R. Soc. Interface
19
(188
), 20220043
(2022
). 78.
F.
Parastesh
, S.
Jafari
, H.
Azarnoush
et al., “Chimeras
,” Phys. Rep.
898
, 1
–114
(2021
). 79.
Z.
Gao
, W.
Dang
, X.
Wang
et al., “Complex networks and deep learning for EEG signal analysis
,” Cogn. Neurodyn.
15
, 369
–388
(2021
). 80.
M.
Gosak
, R.
Markovič
, J.
Dolenšek
et al., “Network science of biological systems at different scales: A review
,” Phys. Life Rev.
24
, 118
–135
(2018
). 81.
G.
Quaranta
, W.
Lacarbonara
, and S. F.
Masri
, “A review on computational intelligence for identification of nonlinear dynamical systems
,” Nonlinear Dyn.
99
, 1709
–1761
(2020
). © 2023 Author(s). Published under an exclusive license by AIP Publishing.
2023
Author(s)
You do not currently have access to this content.
