We present a quantitative study of an online course developed during COVID19 sanitary emergency in Chile. We reconstruct the teaching–learning process considering the activity logs on digital platforms in order to answer the question of How do our students study? The results from the analysis evidence the complex adaptive character of the academic environment, which exhibits regularities similar to those found in financial markets (e.g., distributions of the daily time devoted to learning activities follow patterns like Pareto’s or Zipf’s law). Our empirical results illustrate (i) the relevance of economic notions in the understanding of the teaching–learning processes and (ii) the reliability of quantitative methods based on digital platforms to conduct experimental studies in this framework. We introduce in the present work a series of indicators to characterize the performance of professors, students’ follow-up of the course, and their learning progress by crossing information with the results of assessments. In this context, the learning rate appears as a key statistical descriptor for the allocation of the student workload.
REFERENCES
1.
E. Commission, S. Directorate-General for Education, Youth, and Culture, ECTS Users’ Guide 2015 (Publications Office, 2017).
2.
F.
Kri Amar
et al., Manual Para la Implementación del Sistema de Créditos Académicos Transferibles SCT-Chile
(Consejo de Rectores de las Universidades Chilenas, CRUCH
, 2013
).3.
E.
Chambers
, “Work-load and the quality of student learning
,” Stud. High. Educ.
17
, 141
–153
(1992
). 4.
D.
Kember
, “Interpreting student workload and the factors which shape students’ perceptions of their workload
,” Stud. High. Educ.
29
, 165
–184
(2004
).5.
J.
Gonzalez
and R. E.
Wagenaar
, Tuning Educational Structures in Europe II: Universities’ Contribution to the Bologna Process
(Universidad de Deusto
, Bilbao
, 2005
).6.
C. A.
Bonfield
, M.
Salter
, A.
Longmuir
, M.
Benson
, and C.
Adachi
, “Transformation or evolution?: Education 4.0, teaching and learning in the digital age
,” High. Educ. Pedagogies
5
, 223
–246
(2020
). 7.
D.
Emetarom Aduba
and O.
Mayowa-Adebara
, “Online platforms used for teaching and learning during the COVID-19 era: The case of LIS students in Delta State University, Abraka
,” Int. Inf. Lib. Rev.
54
, 17
–31
(2022
).8.
R.
Watermeyer
, T.
Crick
, and C.
Knight
, “Digital disruption in the time of COVID-19: Learning technologists’ accounts of institutional barriers to online learning, teaching and assessment in UK universities
,” Int. J. Acad. Dev.
27
, 148
–162
(2022
). 9.
J.-R.
Ruiz-Gallardo
, J. L.
González-Geraldo
, and S.
Castaño
, “What are our students doing? Workload, time allocation and time management in PBL instruction. A case study in science education
,” Teach. Teach. Educ.
53
, 51
–62
(2016
). 10.
A.
Souto-Iglesias
and M. T.
Baeza-Romero
, “A probabilistic approach to student workload: Empirical distributions and ECTS
,” High. Educ.
76
, 1007
–1025
(2018
). 11.
R. N.
Mantegna
and H. E.
Stanley
, Introduction to Econophysics: Correlations and Complexity in Finance
(Cambridge University Press
, 2007
).12.
J.
Jewett
and R.
Serway
, Physics for Scientists and Engineers with Modern Physics
(Thomson Brooks/Cole
, 2008
).13.
14.
K.
Bailey
, Learning About Language Assesment: Dilemmas, Decisions, and Directions & New Ways of Classroom Assessment
(Heinle & Heinle
, 1998
).15.
16.
G.
Zipf
, Human Behavior and the Principle of Least Effort
(Addison-Wesley Press Inc
, Cambridge
, 1949
).17.
V.
Pareto
, Cours d’Économie Politique: Nouvelle édition par G.-H. Bousquet et G. Busino (Librairie Droz, Geneva, 1964), pp. 299–345.18.
F.
Benford
, “The law of anomalous numbers
,” Proc. Am. Philos. Soc.
78
, 551
(1938
), http://www.jstor.org/stable/984802.19.
S.
Newcomb
, “Note on the frequency of use of the different digits in natural numbers
,” Am. J. Math.
4
, 39
–40
(1881
). 20.
W. J.
Reed
, “On the rank-size distribution for human settlements
,” J. Reg. Sci.
42
, 1
–17
(2002
). 21.
S.
Glassman
, “A caching relay for the world wide web,” Comput. Netw. ISDN Sys.
27
(2), 165–173
(1994
). 22.
L.
Breslau
, P.
Cao
, L.
Fan
, G.
Phillips
, and S.
Shenker
, “Web caching and Zipf-like distributions: Evidence and implications,” in 18th Annual Joint Conference of the IEEE Computer and Communications Societies (INFOCOM'99) (IEEE, 1999), pp. 126–134.23.
B.
Huberman
and L.
Adamic
, “Note on the frequency of use of the digits in natural numbers
,” Nature
401
, 131
(1999
). 24.
B.
Mandelbrot
, The Fractal Geometry of Nature
(W. H. Freeman and Company
, New York
, 1983
).25.
T.
Hill
, “The first digit phenomenon
,” Am. Sci.
86
, 358
–363
(1998
). 26.
L.
Pietronero
, E.
Tosatti
, V.
Tosatti
, and A.
Vespignani
, “Explaining the uneven distribution of numbers in nature: The laws of Benford and Zipf
,” Physica A
293
, 297
–304
(2001
). 27.
L.
Aitchison
, N.
Corradi
, and P.
Latham
, “Zipf’s law arises naturally when there are underlying, unobserved variables
,” PLoS Comput. Biol.
12
, e1005110
(2016
). 28.
29.
V.
Vemuri
and J.
Schmidt
, Modeling of Complex Systems: An Introduction, Operations Research and Industrial Engineering (Elsevier Science, 2014).30.
E.
Skrimizea
, H.
Haniotou
, and C.
Parra
, “On the complexity turn in planning: An adaptive rationale to navigate spaces and times of uncertainty
,” Plann. Theory
18
, 122
–142
(2019
). 31.
L.
Velazquez
, Programa de Licenciatura en Física c/m Astronomía: Reporte Estadístico 2015–2019, Universidad Católica del Norte, 2020.32.
P. E. A.
Beneitone
, Reflections On and Outlook for Higher Education in Latin America
(Universidad de Deusto
, Bilbao
, 2007
).33.
A.
Tversky
and D.
Kahneman
, “Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases
,” Science
185
, 1124
–1131
(1974
). 34.
A.
Pentland
, Social Physics: How Good Ideas Spread—The Lessons From a New Science
(The Penguin Press
, New York
, 2014
).© 2022 Author(s). Published under an exclusive license by AIP Publishing.
2022
Author(s)
You do not currently have access to this content.
