It is known that individual opinions on different policy issues often align to a dominant ideological dimension (e.g., left vs right) and become increasingly polarized. We provide an agent-based model that reproduces alignment and polarization as emergent properties of opinion dynamics in a multi-dimensional space of continuous opinions. The mechanisms for the change of agents’ opinions in this multi-dimensional space are derived from cognitive dissonance theory and structural balance theory. We test assumptions from proximity voting and from directional voting regarding their ability to reproduce the expected emerging properties. We further study how the emotional involvement of agents, i.e., their individual resistance to change opinions, impacts the dynamics. We identify two regimes for the global and the individual alignment of opinions. If the affective involvement is high and shows a large variance across agents, this fosters the emergence of a dominant ideological dimension. Agents align their opinions along this dimension in opposite directions, i.e., create a state of polarization.
REFERENCES
1.
O.
Artime Vila
, A.
Carro
, A. F.
Peralta
, J. J.
Ramasco
, M.
San Miguel
, and R.
Toral
, “Herding and idiosyncratic choices: Nonlinearity and aging-induced transitions in the noisy voter model
,” C. R. Phys.
20
(4
), 262
–274
(2019
). 2.
D.
Baldassarri
and A.
Gelman
, “Partisans without constraint: Political polarization and trends in American public opinion
,” Am. J. Sociol.
114
(2
), 408
(2008
). 3.
K.
Benoit
and M.
Laver
, “The dimensionality of political space: Epistemological and methodological considerations
,” Eur. Union Politics
13
(2
), 194
–218
(2012
). 4.
K.
Benoit
and M.
Laver
, Party Policy in Modern Democracies
(Routledge
, 2006
).5.
S.
Bornschier
, “The new cultural conflict, polarization, and representation in the Swiss party system, 1975–2011
,” Swiss Political Sci. Rev.
21
(4
), 680
–701
(2015
). 6.
A.
Carro
, R.
Toral
, and M.
San Miguel
, “The role of noise and initial conditions in the asymptotic solution of a bounded confidence, continuous-opinion model
,” J. Stat. Phys.
151
(1–2
), 131
–149
(2013
). 7.
A.
Carro
, R.
Toral
, and M.
San Miguel
, “The noisy voter model on complex networks
,” Sci. Rep.
6
(1
), 24775
(2016
). 8.
D.
Cartwright
and F.
Harary
, “Structural balance: A generalization of Heider’s theory
,” Psychol. Rev.
63
(5
), 277
(1956
). 9.
C.
Castellano
, S.
Fortunato
, and V.
Loreto
, “Statistical physics of social dynamics
,” Rev. Mod. Phys.
81
(2
), 591
(2009
). 10.
M. D.
Conover
, B.
Gonçalves
, A.
Flammini
, and F.
Menczer
, “Partisan asymmetries in online political activity
,” EPJ Data Sci.
1
(1
), 6
(2012
). 11.
P. E.
Converse
, “The nature of belief systems in mass public,” in Ideology and Discontent, edited by D. E. Apter (Free Press, New York, 1964).12.
G.
Deffuant
, F.
Amblard
, G.
Weisbuch
, and T.
Faure
, “How can extremism prevail? A study based on the relative agreement interaction model
,” J. Artif. Soc. Soc. Simul.
5
(4
) (2002
); available at https://ideas.repec.org/a/jas/jasssj/2002-25-2.html.13.
G.
Deffuant
, I.
Bertazzi
, and S.
Huet
, “The dark side of gossips: Hints from a simple opinion dynamics model
,” Adv. Complex Syst.
21
(06n07
), 1850021
(2018
). 14.
G.
Deffuant
, D.
Neau
, F.
Amblard
, and G.
Weisbuch
, “Mixing beliefs among interacting agents
,” Adv. Complex Syst.
3
(01n04
), 87
–98
(2000
). 15.
D.
DellaPosta
, Y.
Shi
, and M.
Macy
, “Why do liberals drink lattes?
,” Am. J. Sociol.
120
(5
), 1473
–1511
(2015
). 16.
P.
DiMaggio
, J.
Evans
, and B.
Bryson
, “Have American’s social attitudes become more polarized?
,” Am. J. Sociol.
102
(3
), 690
–755
(1996
). 17.
M.
Dimock
, C.
Doherty
, J.
Kiley
, and R.
Oates
, “Political polarization in the American public,” Pew Research Center, 2014.18.
I.
Dornic
, H.
Chaté
, J.
Chave
, and H.
Hinrichsen
, “Critical coarsening without surface tension: The universality class of the voter model
,” Phys. Rev. Lett.
87
(4
), 045701
(2001
). 19.
J. N.
Druckman
, E.
Peterson
, and R.
Slothuus
, “How elite partisan polarization affects public opinion formation
,” Am. Polit. Sci. Rev.
107
(01
), 57
–79
(2013
). 20.
B.
Edmonds
et al., “Assessing the safety of (numerical) representation in social simulation,” in Agent-Based Computational Modelling (Physica Verlag, 2005), pp. 195–214.21.
J. M.
Epstein
, Generative Social Science: Studies in Agent-Based Computational Modeling
(Princeton University Press
, 2006
).22.
J.
Fernández-Gracia
, K.
Suchecki
, J. J.
Ramasco
, M.
San Miguel
, and V. M.
Eguíluz
, “Is the voter model a model for voters?
,” Phys. Rev. Lett.
112
(15
), 158701
(2014
). 23.
A.
Flache
, M.
Mäs
, T.
Feliciani
, E.
Chattoe-Brown
, G.
Deffuant
, S.
Huet
, and J.
Lorenz
, “Models of social influence: Towards the next frontiers
,” J. Artif. Soc. Soc. Simul.
20
(4
) (2017
).24.
S.
Galam
, “Democratic voting in hierarchical structures or how to build a dictatorship
,” Adv. Complex Syst.
03
(01n04
), 171
–180
(2000
). 25.
D.
Garcia
, A.
Abisheva
, S.
Schweighofer
, U.
Serdült
, and F.
Schweitzer
, “Ideological and temporal components of network polarization in online political participatory media
,” Policy Internet
7
(1
), 46
–79
(2015
). 26.
D.
Garcia
, F.
Mendez
, U.
Serdult
, and F.
Schweitzer
, “Political polarization and popularity in online participatory media: An integrated approach,” in Proceedings of the 1st Workshop on Politics, Elections and Data—PLEAD ’12 (ACM, 2012), pp. 3–10.27.
D.
Grechyna
, “On the determinants of political polarization
,” Econ. Lett.
144
, 10
–14
(2016
). 28.
P.
Groeber
, J.
Lorenz
, and F.
Schweitzer
, “Dissonance minimization as a microfoundation of social influence in models of opinion formation
,” J. Math. Sociol.
38
(3
), 147
–174
(2014
). 29.
P.
Groeber
, F.
Schweitzer
, and K.
Press
, “How groups can foster consensus: The case of local cultures
,” J. Aritif. Soc. Soc. Simul.
12
(2
), 1
–22
(2009
); available at http://jasss.soc.surrey.ac.uk/12/2/4.html.30.
P.
Hedström
, Dissecting the Social: On the Principles of Analytical Sociology
(Cambridge University Press
, Cambridge
, 2005
).31.
R.
Hegselmann
and U.
Krause
, “Opinion dynamics and bounded confidence models, analysis, and simulation
,” J. Artif. Soc. Soc. Simul.
5
(3
) (2002
); available at http://jasss.soc.surrey.ac.uk/5/3/2.html.32.
R.
Hegselmann
and U.
Krause
, “Opinion dynamics under the influence of radical groups, charismatic leaders, and other constant signals: A simple unifying model
,” Networks Heterogeneous Media
10
(3
), 477
(2015
).33.
F.
Heider
, “Attitudes and cognitive organization
,” J. Psychol.
21
(1
), 107
–112
(1946
). 34.
M. J.
Hetherington
, “Review article: Putting polarization in perspective
,” Br. J. Polit. Sci.
39
(02
), 413
–448
(2009
). 35.
J. A.
Hołyst
, K.
Kacperski
, and F.
Schweitzer
, “Social impact models of opinion dynamics,” in Annual Reviews of Computational Physics (World Scientific, 2001), Vol. 9, pp. 253–273.36.
C. I.
Hovland
, O.
Harvey
, and M.
Sherif
, “Assimilation and contrast effects in reactions to communication and attitude change
,” J. Abnorm. Soc. Psychol.
55
(2
), 244
(1957
). 37.
I. H.
Indridason
, “Coalition formation and polarisation
,” Eur. J. Polit. Res.
50
, 689
–718
(2011
). 38.
S.
Iyengar
and S. J.
Westwood
, “Fear and loathing across party lines: New evidence on group polarization
,” Am. J. Pol. Sci.
59
(3
), 690
–707
(2015
). 39.
N.
Kaldor
, “Capital accumulation and economic growth,” in The Theory of Capital (Springer, 1961), pp. 177–222.40.
H.
Kim
, G. B.
Powell, Jr.
, and R. C.
Fording
, “Electoral systems, party systems, and ideological representation: An analysis of distortion in Western democracies
,” Comp. Polit.
42
(2
), 167
–185
(2010
). 41.
E.
Kurmyshev
, H. A.
Juarez
, and R. A.
Gonzalez-Silva
, “Dynamics of bounded confidence opinion in heterogeneous social networks: Concord against partial antagonism
,” Physica A
390
(16
), 2945
–2955
(2011
). 42.
D.
Lacy
and P.
Paolino
, “Testing proximity versus directional voting using experiments
,” Elect. Stud.
29
(3
), 460
–471
(2010
). 43.
P.
Leimgruber
, D.
Hangartner
, and L.
Leemann
, “Comparing candidates and citizens in the ideological space
,” Swiss Polit. Sci. Rev.
16
(3
), 499
–531
(2010
). 44.
J.
Lorenz
, “Continuous opinion dynamics under bounded confidence: A survey
,” Int. J. Mod. Phys. C
18
(12
), 1819
–1838
(2007
). 45.
A.
Malka
and Y.
Lelkes
, “More than ideology: Conservative–liberal identity and receptivity to political cues
,” Soc. Justice Res.
23
(2–3
), 156
–188
(2010
). 46.
L.
Mason
, “The rise of uncivil agreement: Issue versus behavioral polarization in the American electorate
,” Am. Behav. Sci.
57
(1
), 140
–159
(2013
). 47.
L.
Mason
, “Distinguishing the polarizing effects of ideology as identity, issue positions, and issue-based identity,” in paper presented at the Center for the Study of Democratic Politics Conference on Political Polarization: Media and Communication Influences, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, 2015.48.
X. F.
Meng
, R. A.
Van Gorder
, and M. A.
Porter
, “Opinion formation and distribution in a bounded-confidence model on various networks
,” Phys. Rev. E
97
(2
), 022312
(2018
). 49.
S.
Merrill
and B.
Grofman
, A Unified Theory of Voting: Directional and Proximity Spatial Models
(Cambridge University Press
, 1999
).50.
B.
Min
and M.
San Miguel
, “Fragmentation transitions in a coevolving nonlinear voter model
,” Sci. Rep.
7
(1
), 1
(2017
). 51.
E.
Pariser
, The Filter Bubble: What the Internet Is Hiding from You
(Penguin
, UK
, 2011
).52.
N.
Perony
, R.
Pfitzner
, I.
Scholtes
, C. J.
Tessone
, and F.
Schweitzer
, “Enhancing consensus under opinion bias by means of hierarchical decision making
,” Adv. Complex Syst.
16
(06
), 1350020
(2013
). 53.
M.
Pineda
, R.
Toral
, and E.
Hernández-García
, “Diffusing opinions in bounded confidence processes
,” Eur. Phys. J. D
62
(1
), 109
–117
(2011
). 54.
K. T.
Poole
, Spatial Models of Parliamentary Voting
(Cambridge University Press
, 2005
).55.
G.
Rabinowitz
and S. E.
Macdonald
, “A directional theory of issue voting
,” Am. Polit. Sci. Rev.
83
(1
), 93
–121
(1989
). 56.
R. C.
Schank
and E.
Langer
, Beliefs, Reasoning, and Decision Making: Psycho-logic in Honor of Bob Abelson
(Psychology Press
, 2013
).57.
S.
Schweighofer
, F.
Schweitzer
, and D.
Garcia
, “A weighted balance model of opinion hyperpolarization
,” J. Artif. Soc. Soc. Simul.
(2020
); SocArXiv. 58.
F.
Schweitzer
, Brownian Agents and Active Particles: Collective Dynamics in the Natural and Social Sciences
(Springer Science & Business Media
, 2007
).59.
F.
Schweitzer
, “Sociophysics
,” Phys. Today
71
(2
), 40
–46
(2018
). 60.
F.
Schweitzer
, “The law of proportionate growth and its siblings: Applications in agent-based modeling of socio-economic systems,” in Complexity, Heterogeneity, and the Methods of Statistical Physics in Economics, edited by H. Aoyama, Y. Aruka, and H. Yoshikawa (Springer, Tokyo, 2020), pp. 145–176.61.
F.
Schweitzer
and L.
Behera
, “Nonlinear voter models: The transition from invasion to coexistence
,” Eur. Phys. J. B
67
(3
), 301
–318
(2009
). 62.
F.
Schweitzer
, T.
Krivachy
, and D.
Garcia
, “An agent-based model of opinion polarization driven by emotions
,” Complexity
2020
, 5282035
. 63.
A.
Sirbu
, V.
Loreto
, V. D. P.
Servedio
, and F.
Tria
, “Opinion dynamics with disagreement and modulated information
,” J. Stat. Phys.
151
(1–2
), 218
–237
(2013
). 64.
H.-U.
Stark
, C. J.
Tessone
, and F.
Schweitzer
, “Decelerating microdynamics can accelerate macrodynamics in the voter model
,” Phys. Rev. Lett.
101
(1
), 018701
(2008
). 65.
E.
Suhay
, “Explaining group influence: The role of identity and emotion in political conformity and polarization
,” Polit. Behav.
37
(1
), 221
–251
(2015
). 66.
K.
Takács
, A.
Flache
, and M.
Mäs
, “Discrepancy and disliking do not induce negative opinion shifts
,” PLoS One
11
(6
), e0157948
(2016
); available at .67.
G.
Vaccario
, M. V.
Tomasello
, C. J.
Tessone
, and F.
Schweitzer
, “Quantifying knowledge exchange in R&D networks: A data-driven model
,” J. Evol. Econ.
28
(3
), 461
–493
(2018
). 68.
F.
Vazquez
, P. L.
Krapivsky
, and S.
Redner
, “Freezing and slow evolution in a constrained opinion dynamics model
,” J. Phys. A
36
, L61
–L68
(2003
), Ms vorh. 69.
G.
Weisbuch
, “Bounded confidence and social networks
,” Eur. Phys. J. B
38
(2
), 339
–343
(2004
). 70.
A. M.
Wilford
, “Polarization, number of parties, and voter turnout: Explaining turnout in 26 OECD countries
,” Soc. Sci. Q.
98
(5
), 1391
–1405
(2017
). © 2020 Author(s).
2020
Author(s)
You do not currently have access to this content.
