Dynamical effects on healthy brains and brains affected by tumor are investigated via numerical simulations. The brains are modeled as multilayer networks consisting of neuronal oscillators whose connectivities are extracted from Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) data. The numerical results demonstrate that the healthy brain presents chimera-like states where regions with high white matter concentrations in the direction connecting the two hemispheres act as the coherent domain, while the rest of the brain presents incoherent oscillations. To the contrary, in brains with destructed structures, traveling waves are produced initiated at the region where the tumor is located. These areas act as the pacemaker of the waves sweeping across the brain. The numerical simulations are performed using two neuronal models: (a) the FitzHugh–Nagumo model and (b) the leaky integrate-and-fire model. Both models give consistent results regarding the chimera-like oscillations in healthy brains and the pacemaker effect in the tumorous brains. These results are considered a starting point for further investigation in the detection of tumors with small sizes before becoming discernible on MRI recordings as well as in tumor development and evolution.
Skip Nav Destination
,
,
,
,
,
Article navigation
November 2020
Research Article|
November 19 2020
Structural anomalies in brain networks induce dynamical pacemaker effects Available to Purchase
I. Koulierakis;
I. Koulierakis
a)
1
Institute of Nanoscience and Nanotechnology, National Center for Scientific Research “Demokritos,”
15341 Athens, Greece
2
School of Electrical and Computer Engineering, National Technical University of Athens
, 15780 Athens, Greece
Search for other works by this author on:
D. A. Verganelakis;
D. A. Verganelakis
b)
3
Nuclear Medicine Unit, Oncology Clinic “Marianna V. Vardinoyiannis—ELPIDA,” Childrens’ Hospital “A. Sofia,”
11527 Athens, Greece
Search for other works by this author on:
I. Omelchenko
;
I. Omelchenko
c)
4
Institut für Theoretische Physik, Technische Universität Berlin
, Hardenbergstrasse 36, 10623 Berlin, Germany
Search for other works by this author on:
A. Zakharova
;
A. Zakharova
d)
4
Institut für Theoretische Physik, Technische Universität Berlin
, Hardenbergstrasse 36, 10623 Berlin, Germany
Search for other works by this author on:
E. Schöll
;
E. Schöll
e)
4
Institut für Theoretische Physik, Technische Universität Berlin
, Hardenbergstrasse 36, 10623 Berlin, Germany
5
Bernstein Center for Computational Neuroscience, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin
, Unter den Linden 6, 10099 Berlin, Germany
6
Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research
, Telegrafenberg A 31, 14473 Potsdam, Germany
Search for other works by this author on:
A. Provata
A. Provata
f)
1
Institute of Nanoscience and Nanotechnology, National Center for Scientific Research “Demokritos,”
15341 Athens, Greece
f)Author to whom correspondence should be addressed: [email protected]
Search for other works by this author on:
I. Koulierakis
1,2,a)
D. A. Verganelakis
3,b)
I. Omelchenko
4,c)
A. Zakharova
4,d)
E. Schöll
4,5,6,e)
A. Provata
1,f)
1
Institute of Nanoscience and Nanotechnology, National Center for Scientific Research “Demokritos,”
15341 Athens, Greece
2
School of Electrical and Computer Engineering, National Technical University of Athens
, 15780 Athens, Greece
3
Nuclear Medicine Unit, Oncology Clinic “Marianna V. Vardinoyiannis—ELPIDA,” Childrens’ Hospital “A. Sofia,”
11527 Athens, Greece
4
Institut für Theoretische Physik, Technische Universität Berlin
, Hardenbergstrasse 36, 10623 Berlin, Germany
5
Bernstein Center for Computational Neuroscience, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin
, Unter den Linden 6, 10099 Berlin, Germany
6
Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research
, Telegrafenberg A 31, 14473 Potsdam, Germany
a)
Electronic mail: [email protected]
b)
Electronic mail: [email protected]
c)
Electronic mail: [email protected]
d)
Electronic mail: [email protected]
e)
Electronic mail: [email protected]
f)Author to whom correspondence should be addressed: [email protected]
Chaos 30, 113137 (2020)
Article history
Received:
February 29 2020
Accepted:
October 22 2020
Citation
I. Koulierakis, D. A. Verganelakis, I. Omelchenko, A. Zakharova, E. Schöll, A. Provata; Structural anomalies in brain networks induce dynamical pacemaker effects. Chaos 1 November 2020; 30 (11): 113137. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0006207
Download citation file:
Pay-Per-View Access
$40.00
Sign In
You could not be signed in. Please check your credentials and make sure you have an active account and try again.
Citing articles via
Rogue waves: Theory, methods, and applications—30 years after the Draupner wave
Zhenya Yan, Boris A. Malomed, et al.
Enhancing reservoir predictions of chaotic time series by incorporating delayed values of input and reservoir variables
Luk Fleddermann, Sebastian Herzog, et al.
Selecting embedding delays: An overview of embedding techniques and a new method using persistent homology
Eugene Tan, Shannon Algar, et al.
Related Content
Pacemaker interactions induce reentrant wave dynamics in engineered cardiac culture
Chaos (August 2012)
Heterogeneous and Self‐Organized Pacemakers in Reaction‐Diffusion Systems
AIP Conf. Proc. (April 2003)
Stochastic resonance on a modular neuronal network of small-world subnetworks with a subthreshold pacemaker
Chaos (December 2011)
Collective dynamics of swarmalators driven by a mobile pacemaker
Chaos (November 2024)