As economic globalisation increases, inclination toward domestic protectionism is also increasing in many countries of the world. To improve the productivity and the resilience of national economies, it is important to understand the drivers and the barriers of the internatiolisation of economic activities. While internatiolisation of individual economic actors is difficult to explain using traditional theories, aggregate patterns may be explained to some extent. We take a network-centric perspective to describe the extent of corporate internatiolisation in different countries. Based on Newman’s assortativity coefficient, we design a range of assortativity metrics which are appropriate in the firm network context. Using these, we quantify companies’ appetite for internatiolisation in relation to the internatiolisation of their partners. We use the Factset Revere dataset, which is provided by FactSet Research Systems Inc., that captures global supply chain relationships between companies. We identify countries where the level of internationalisation is relatively high or relatively low, and we show that subtle differences in the assortativity metrics used change the ranking of countries significantly in terms of the assortativity correlation, highlighting that companies in different countries are prone to different types of internationalisation. Overall, we demonstrate that firms from most countries in the dataset studied have a slight preference to make supply chain relationships with other firms which have undergone a similar level of internationalisation, and other firms from their own country. The implications of our results are important for countries to understand the evolution of international relationships in their corporate environments, and how they compare to other nations in the world in this regard.

1.
T. Y.
Choi
,
K. J.
Dooley
, and
M.
Rungtusanatham
, “
Supply networks and complex adaptive systems: Control versus emergence
,”
J. Oper. Manage.
19
(
3
),
351
366
(
2001
).
2.
S. D.
Pathak
,
J. M.
Day
,
A.
Nair
,
W. J.
Sawaya
, and
M. M.
Kristal
, “
Complexity and adaptivity in supply networks: Building supply network theory using a complex adaptive systems perspective
,”
Decision Sci.
38
(
4
),
547
580
(
2007
).
3.
H.
Thadakamaila
,
U. N.
Raghavan
,
S.
Kumara
, and
R.
Albert
, “
Survivability of multiagent-based supply networks: A topological perspect
,”
IEEE Intell. Syst.
19
(
5
),
24
31
(
2004
).
4.
Y.
Kim
,
Y.-S.
Chen
, and
K.
Linderman
, “
Supply network disruption and resilience: A network structural perspective
,”
J. Oper. Manage.
33
,
43
59
(
2015
).
5.
Y.
Li
, “
Networked analysis approach of supply chain network
,”
J. Netw.
9
(
3
),
777
(
2014
).
6.
S. I.
Mari
,
Y. H.
Lee
,
M. S.
Memon
,
Y. S.
Park
, and
M.
Kim
, “
Adaptivity of complex network topologies for designing resilient supply chain networks
,”
Int. J. Ind. Eng.
22
(
1
),
102
116
(
2015
).
7.
M.
Xu
,
X.
Wang
, and
L.
Zhao
, “
Predicted supply chain resilience based on structural evolution against random supply disruptions
,”
Int. J. Syst. Sci. Oper. Logist.
1
(
2
),
105
117
(
2014
).
8.
M.
Bell
,
S.
Perera
,
M.
Piraveenan
,
M.
Bliemer
,
T.
Latty
, and
C.
Reid
, “
Network growth models: A behavioural basis for attachment proportional to fitness
,”
Sci. Rep.
7
,
42431
(
2017
).
9.
S.
Perera
,
M. G.
Bell
,
M.
Piraveenan
,
D.
Kasthurirathna
, and
M.
Parhi
, “
Topological structure of manufacturing industry supply chain networks
,”
Complexity
2018
,
1
23
(
2018
).
10.
M. E. J.
Newman
, “
Assortative mixing in networks
,”
Phys. Rev. Lett.
89
(
20
),
208701
(
2002
).
11.
M.
Piraveenan
,
M.
Prokopenko
, and
A.
Zomaya
, “
Assortative mixing in directed biological networks
,”
IEEE/ACM Trans. Comput. Biol. Bioinf.
9
(
1
),
66
78
(
2012
).
12.
M.
Piraveenan
,
M.
Prokopenko
, and
A. Y.
Zomaya
, “
On congruity of nodes and assortative information content in complex networks
,”
Netw. Heterogenous Media
7
(
3
),
441
461
(
2012
).
13.
J. H.
Dunning
, “
Toward an eclectic theory of international production: Some empirical tests
,”
J. Int. Bus. Stud.
11
(
1
),
9
31
(
1980
).
14.
J.
Johanson
and
J.-E.
Vahlne
, “
Commitment and opportunity development in the internationalization process: A note on the Uppsala internationalization process model
,”
Manage. Int. Rev.
46
(
2
),
165
178
(
2006
).
15.
G. A.
Knight
and
P. W.
Liesch
, “
Internationalization: From incremental to born global
,”
J. World Business
51
(
1
),
93
102
(
2016
).
16.
N. E.
Coviello
, “
The network dynamics of international new ventures
,”
J. Int. Bus. Stud.
37
(
5
),
713
731
(
2006
).
17.
J.
Johanson
and
J.-E.
Vahlne
, “
Markets as networks: Implications for strategy-making
,”
J. Acad. Market. Sci.
39
(
4
),
484
491
(
2011
).
18.
J.
Johanson
and
J.-E.
Vahlne
, “
The uppsala internationalization process model revisited: From liability of foreignness to liability of outsidership
,”
J. Int. Bus. Stud.
40
(
9
),
1411
1431
(
2009
).
19.
Y.
Chandra
and
I. F.
Wilkinson
, “
Firm internationalization from a network-centric complex-systems perspective
,”
J. World Bus.
52
(
5
),
691
701
(
2017
).
20.
A.-L.
Barabási
and
R.
Albert
, “
Emergence of scaling in random networks
,”
Science
286
(
5439
),
509
512
(
1999
).
21.
A.-L.
Barabási
,
Linked: The New Science of Networks
(Ingram, 2003).
22.
M.
Jalili
and
M.
Perc
, “
Information cascades in complex networks
,”
J. Complex Networks
5
(
5
),
665
693
(
2017
).
23.
D.
Helbing
,
D.
Brockmann
,
T.
Chadefaux
,
K.
Donnay
,
U.
Blanke
,
O.
Woolley-Meza
,
M.
Moussaid
,
A.
Johansson
,
J.
Krause
,
S.
Schutte
, and
M.
Perc
, “
Saving human lives: What complexity science and information systems can contribute
,”
J. Stat. Phys.
158
(
3
),
735
781
(
2015
).
24.
C.
Zachreson
,
K. M.
Fair
,
O. M.
Cliff
,
N.
Harding
,
M.
Piraveenan
, and
M.
Prokopenko
, “
Urbanization affects peak timing, prevalence, and bimodality of influenza pandemics in Australia: Results of a census-calibrated model
,”
Sci. Adv.
4
(
12
),
eaau5294
(
2018
).
25.
M.
Piraveenan
,
M.
Prokopenko
, and
L.
Hossain
, “
Percolation centrality: Quantifying graph-theoretic impact of nodes during percolation in networks
,”
PLoS One
8
(
1
),
e53095
(
2013
).
26.
M.
Gosak
,
R.
Markovič
,
J.
Dolenšek
,
M. S.
Rupnik
,
M.
Marhl
,
A.
Stožer
, and
M.
Perc
, “
Network science of biological systems at different scales: A review
,”
Phys. Life Rev.
24
,
118
135
(
2018
).
27.
FactSet Supply Chain Relationships: Data and Methodology Guide, see https://open.factset.com/catalog/products/factset-supply-chain-relationships/en-us; accessed 28 September 2017.
28.
Government of the United Kingdom (2008) Standard Industrial Classification of Economic Activities (SIC), see https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/standard-industrial-classification-of-economic-activities-sic}; accessed 19 October 2018.
29.
M.
Piraveenan
,
M.
Prokopenko
, and
A.
Zomaya
, “
Local assortativeness in scale-free networks
,”
Europhys. Lett.
84
(
2
),
28002
(
2008
).
30.
D.
Novy
, “
Gravity redux: Measuring international trade costs with panel data
,”
Econ. Inquiry
51
(
1
),
101
121
(
2013
).
31.
S.
Miroudot
,
J.
Sauvage
, and
B.
Shepherd
, “
Measuring the cost of international trade in services
,”
World Trade Rev.
12
(
4
),
719
735
(
2013
).
You do not currently have access to this content.