Individuals follow different rules for action: they react swiftly, grasping the short-term advantages in sight, or they waste cognitive resources to complete otherwise easy tasks, but they are able to plan ahead future complex decisions. Scholars from different disciplines studied the conditions under which either decision rule may enhance the fitness of its adopters, with a focus on the environmental features. However, we here propose that a crucial feature of the evolution of populations and their decision rules is rather inter-group interactions. Indeed, we study what happens when two groups support different decision rules, encapsulated in narratives, and their populations interact with each other. In particular, we assume that the payoff of each rule depends on the share of both social groups which adopt such rules. We then describe the most salient dynamics scenarios and identify the conditions which lead to chaotic dynamics and multistability regimes.

1.
O.
Barrera
,
S.
Guriev
,
E.
Henry
,
E.
Zhuravskaya
 et al, “
Facts, alternative facts, and fact checking in times of post-truth politics
,”
Technical Report No. 12220
, CEPR Discussion Papers (
2017
).
2.
G. I.
Bischi
,
U.
Merlone
, and
E.
Pruscini
, “
Evolutionary dynamics in club goods binary games
,”
J. Econ. Dyn. Control
(in press, corrected proof, 2018).
3.
G.-I.
Bischi
,
L.
Stefanini
, and
L.
Gardini
, “
Synchronization, intermittency and critical curves in a duopoly game
,”
Math. Comput. Simul.
44
,
559
585
(
1998
).
4.
W. A.
Brock
and
S. N.
Durlauf
, “
Discrete choice with social interactions
,”
Rev. Econ. Stud.
68
,
235
260
(
2001
).
5.
J.
Buescu
,
Exotic Attractors: From Liapunov Stability to Riddled Basins
(
Birkhäuser
,
2012
), Vol.
153
.
6.
F.
Cavalli
,
A.
Naimzada
, and
M.
Pireddu
, “
A family of models for Schelling binary choices
,”
Physica A
444
,
276
296
(
2016
).
7.
P.
Collier
, “
The cultural foundations of economic failure: A conceptual toolkit
,”
J. Econ Behav. Org.
126
,
5
24
(
2016
).
8.
D. D.
Porta
and
M.
Diani
, “
Social movements and organizational form
,” in
Social Movements: An Introduction
, 2nd ed. (
Blackwell Publishers
,
Oxford
,
2006
), pp.
74
87
.
9.
C.
Diks
and
R.
Van Der Weide
, “
Herding, a-synchronous updating and heterogeneity in memory in a CBS
,”
J. Econ. Dyn. Control
29
,
741
763
(
2005
).
10.
J. St. B. T.
Evans
, “
Dual-processing accounts of reasoning, judgment, and social cognition
,”
Annu. Rev. Psychol.
59
,
255
278
(
2008
).
11.
G.
Gigerenzer
and
W.
Gaissmaier
, “
Heuristic decision making
,”
Annu. Rev. Psychol.
62
,
451
482
(
2011
).
12.
G.
Gigerenzer
,
P. M.
Todd
,
ABC Research Group
 et al,
Simple Heuristics That Make Us Smart
(
Oxford University Press
,
1999
).
13.
D.
Kahneman
,
Thinking, Fast and Slow
(
Macmillan
,
2011
).
14.
T.-Y.
Li
and
J. A.
Yorke
, “
Period three implies chaos
,”
Am. Math. Mon.
82
,
985
992
(
1975
).
15.
B. J.
McKenna
and
P.
Graham
, “
Technocratic discourse: A primer
,”
J. Tech. Writing Commun.
30
,
223
251
(
2000
).
16.
A.
Mesoudi
,
Cultural Evolution: How Darwinian Theory Can Explain Human Culture and Synthesize the Social Sciences
(
University of Chicago Press
,
2011
).
17.
D. G.
Myers
, “
Discussion and research directions
,” in
Exploring Psychology
(
Macmillan
,
2004
), Chap. VII, pp.
435
443
.
18.
T. C.
Schelling
, “
Hockey helmets, concealed weapons, and daylight saving: A study of binary choices with externalities
,”
J. Conflict Resolut.
17
,
381
428
(
1973
).
19.
P.
Slovic
and
E.
Peters
, “
Risk perception and affect
,”
Curr. Dir. Psychol.
15
,
322
325
(
2006
).
20.
D. F. P.
Toupo
,
S. H.
Strogatz
,
J. D.
Cohen
, and
D. G.
Rand
, “
Evolutionary game dynamics of controlled and automatic decision-making
,”
Chaos
25
,
073120
(
2015
).
21.
R.
Wodak
, “
Populist discourses: The rhetoric of exclusion in written genres
,”
Document Design
4
,
132
148
(
2003
).
22.
P.
Zeppini
, “
A discrete choice model of transitions to sustainable technologies
,”
J. Econ. Behav. Org.
112
,
187
203
(
2015
).
You do not currently have access to this content.