It is of utter importance for the policy makers, bankers, and investors to thoroughly understand the probability of bank-run (PBR) which was often neglected in the classical models. Bank-run is not merely due to miscoordination (Diamond and Dybvig, 1983) or deterioration of bank assets (Allen and Gale, 1998) but various factors. This paper presents the simulation results of the nonlinear dynamic probabilities of bank runs based on the global games approach, with the distinct assumption that heterogenous agents hold highly correlated but unidentical beliefs about the true payoffs. The specific technique used in the simulation is to let agents have an integrated cognitive-affective network. It is observed that, even when the economy is good, agents are significantly affected by the cognitive-affective network to react to bad news which might lead to bank-run. Both the rise of the late payoffs, R, and the early payoffs, r, will decrease the effect of the affective process. The increased risk sharing might or might not increase PBR, and the increase in late payoff is beneficial for preventing the bank run. This paper is one of the pioneers that links agent-based computational economics and behavioral economics.

1.
Allen
,
F.
and
Gale
,
D.
, “
Optimal financial crises
,”
J. Finance
53
(
4
),
1245
1284
(
1998
).
2.
Alos-Ferrer
,
C.
and
Strack
,
F.
, “
From dual processes to multiple selves: Implications for economic behavior
,”
J. Econ. Psychol.
41
,
1
11
(
2014
).
3.
Barnard
,
C.
and
Simon
,
H. A.
,
Administrative Behavior. A Study of Decision-Making Processes in Administrative Organization
(
Free Press
,
New York
,
1947
).
4.
Benjamin
,
D. J.
and
Shapiro
,
J. M.
,
Does Cognitive Ability Reduce Psychological Bias?
(
Harvard University
,
2005
).
5.
Busemeyer
,
J. R.
 et al, “
Integrating emotional processes into decision-making models
,”
Integr. Models Cognit. Syst.
1
,
213
(
2007
).
6.
Busemeyer
,
J. R.
and
Townsend
,
J. T.
, “
Decision field theory: A dynamic-cognitive approach to decision making in an uncertain environment
,”
Psychol. Rev.
100
(
3
),
432
(
1993
).
7.
Busemeyer
,
J. R.
 et al, “
Motivational underpinnings of utility in decision making
,”
Adv. Conscious. Res.
44
,
197
220
(
2002
).
8.
Camerer
,
C.
 et al, “
Neuroeconomics: How neuroscience can inform economics
,”
J. Econ. Lit.
43
,
9
64
(
2005
).
9.
Carlsson
,
H.
and
Van Damme
,
E.
, “
Global games and equilibrium selection
,”
Econometrica
61
,
989
1018
(
1993
).
10.
Christelis
,
D.
 et al, “
Cognitive abilities and portfolio choice
,”
Eur. Econ. Rev.
54
(
1
),
18
38
(
2010
).
11.
Damasio
,
H.
 et al, “
The return of Phineas Gage: clues about the brain from the skull of a famous patient
,”
Science
264
(
5162
),
1102
1105
(
1994
).
12.
Diamond
,
D. W.
and
Dybvig
,
P. H.
, “
Bank runs, deposit insurance, and liquidity
,”
J. Political Econ.
91
(
3
),
401
419
(
1983
).
13.
Epstein
,
S.
, “
Integration of the cognitive and the psychodynamic unconscious
,”
Am. Psychol.
49
(
8
),
709
(
1994
).
14.
Frederick
,
S.
, “
Cognitive reflection and decision making
,”
J. Econ. Perspect.
19
(
4
),
25
42
(
2005
).
15.
Goldstein
,
I.
and
Pauzner
,
A.
, “
Demand–deposit contracts and the probability of bank runs
,”
J. Finance
60
(
3
),
1293
1327
(
2005
).
16.
Gray
,
J. R.
, “
Integration of emotion and cognitive control
,”
Curr. Dir. Psychol. Sci.
13
(
2
),
46
48
(
2004
).
17.
Kahneman
,
D.
and
Frederick
,
S.
, “
Representativeness revisited: Attribute substitution in intuitive judgment
,”
Heuristics Biases: Psychol. Intuitive Judgment
49
,
49
81
(
2002
).
18.
Kahneman
,
D.
and
Tversky
,
A.
, “
Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk
,”
Econometrica
47
,
263
291
(
1979
).
19.
Klos
,
A.
and
Sträter
,
N.
, How strongly do players react to changes in payoff parameters in an experimental bank run game?,
2012
.
20.
Loewenstein
,
G.
and
O'Donoghue
,
T.
, Animal spirits: Affective and deliberative processes in economic behavior,
2004
.
21.
Mellers
,
B. A.
 et al, “
Decision affect theory: Emotional reactions to the outcomes of risky options
,”
Psychol. Sci.
8
(
6
),
423
429
(
1997
).
22.
Morris
,
S.
and
Shin
,
H. S.
, “
Heterogeneity and uniqueness in interaction games
,” Cowles Foundation Discussion Paper No. 1402,
2003
.
23.
Peters
,
E.
and
Slovic
,
P.
, “
The springs of action: Affective and analytical information processing in choice
,”
Pers. Soc. Psychol. Bull.
26
(
12
),
1465
1475
(
2000
).
24.
Russell
and
Norvig
,
A modern approach
,” in
Artificial Intelligence
(
Prentice-Hall
,
Englewood Cliffs
,
1995
), Vol.
25
, p.
27
.
25.
Simon
,
H. A.
, “
A behavioral model of rational choice
,”
Q. J. Econ.
69
(
1
),
99
118
(
1955
).
26.
Simon
,
H. A.
, “
Theories of decision-making in economics and behavioral science
,”
Am. Econ. Rev.
49
(
3
),
253
283
(
1959
).
27.
Simon
,
H. A.
, “
Modeling human mental processes
,”
paper presented at the Western Joint IRE-AIEE-ACM Computer Conference
, 9-11 May 1961 (
ACM
,
1961
).
28.
Simon
,
H. A.
,
The Sciences of the Artificial
(
MIT Press
,
Cambridge, MA
1969
).
29.
Stanovich
,
K. E.
and
R. F.
West
Individual differences in reasoning: Implications for the rationality debate?
Behav. Brain Sci.
23
(
5
),
645
665
. (
2000
).
30.
Tversky
,
A.
and
Kahneman
,
D.
, “
Loss aversion in riskless choice: A reference-dependent model
,”
Q. J. Econ.
106
(
4
),
1039
1061
(
1991
).
31.
Weihong
,
H.
and
Qiao
,
H.
, “
Liquidity shock, animal spirits and bank runs
,”
Essays in Economic Dynamics
(
Springer
,
2016
), pp.
225
243
.
You do not currently have access to this content.