The runoff coefficient of a hillslope is a reliable measure for changes in the streamflow response at the river link outlet. A high runoff coefficient is a good indicator of the possibility of flash floods. Although the relationship between runoff coefficient and streamflow has been the subject of much study, the physical mechanisms affecting runoff coefficient including the dependence on precipitation pattern remain open topics for investigation. In this paper, we analyze a rainfall-runoff model at the hillslope scale as that hillslope is forced with different rain patterns: constant rain and fluctuating rain with different frequencies and amplitudes. When an oscillatory precipitation pattern is applied, although the same amount of water may enter the system, its response (measured by the runoff coefficient) will be maximum for a certain frequency of precipitation. The significant increase in runoff coefficient after a certain pattern of rainfall can be a potential explanation for the conditions preceding flash-floods.

1.
V. M.
Castillo
,
A.
Gomez-Plaza
, and
M.
Martinez-Mena
, “
The role of antecedent soil water content in the runoff response of semiarid catchments: A simulation approach
,”
J. Hydrol.
284
,
114
130
(
2003
).
2.
L. K.
Cunha
, “
Exploring the benefits of satellite remote sensing for flood prediction across scales
,” Ph.D. thesis (
Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, The University of Iowa
,
2012
), see http://ir.uiowa.edu/cqi/viewcontent.cgi?article=321&&context=etd.
3.
L. K.
Cunha
,
P. V.
Mandapaka
,
W. F.
Krajewski
,
R.
Mantilla
, and
A. A.
Bradley
, “
Impact of radar-rainfall error structure on estimated flood magnitude across scales: An investigation based on a parsimonious distributed hydrological model
,”
Water Resour. Res.
48
,
W10515
, doi: (
2012
).
4.
R.
Curtu
,
R.
Mantilla
,
M.
Fonley
,
L. K.
Cunha
,
S. J.
Small
,
L. O.
Jay
, and
W. F.
Krajewski
, “
An integral-balance nonlinear model to simulate changes in soil moisture, groundwater, and surface runoff dynamics at the hillslope scale
,”
Adv. Water Resour.
71
,
125
139
(
2014
).
5.
C.
Fitzjohn
,
J. L.
Ternan
, and
A. G.
Williams
, “
Soil moisture variability in a semi-arid gully catchment: Implications for runoff and erosion control
,”
Catena
32
,
55
70
(
1998
).
6.
See http://criticalzone.org/shale-hills/ for data and research from the Shale Hills Critical Zone Observatory in Pennsylvania
2012
.
7.
P.
Javelle
,
C.
Fouchier
,
P.
Armaud
, and
J.
Lavabre
, “
Flash flood warning at ungauged locations using radar rainfall and antecedent soil moisture estimations
,”
J. Hydrol.
394
,
267
274
(
2010
).
8.
J. A.
Lynch
and
E. S.
Corbett
, “
Source area variability during peakflow: A function of antecedent soil moisture content
,” in
Watershed Management in the Eighties Conference
, April 30–May 1, 1985, Denver, CO, edited by
E. B.
Jones
and
T. J.
Ward
(
American Society of Civil Engineers
,
New York
,
1985
), pp.
300
307
.
9.
R.
Mantilla
,
V. K.
Gupta
, and
O. J.
Mesa
, “
Role of coupled flow dynamics and real network structures on Hortonian scaling of peak flows
,”
J. Hydrol.
322
,
155
167
(
2006
).
10.
D.
Mackenzie
and
S.
Masten
,
Principles of Environmental Engineering and Science
(
McGraw-Hill Science/Engineering/Math
,
2003
).
11.
H. E.
Meadows
, “
Solution of systems of linear ordinary differential equations with periodic coefficients
,”
Bell Syst. Tech. J.
41
,
1275
1294
(
1962
).
12.
J. D.
Meiss
,
Differential Dynamical Systems
(
SIAM
,
Philadelphia
,
2007
).
13.
R.
Merz
and
G.
Bloeschl
, “
A regional analysis of event runoff coefficients with respect to climate and catchment characteristics in Austria
,”
Water Resour. Res.
45
,
W01405
, doi: (
2009
).
14.
S. H.
Strogatz
,
Nonlinear Dynamics and Chaos
(
Perseus Books Publishing
,
Cambridge, MA
,
1994
).
15.
E.
Zehe
and
G.
Bloeschl
, “
Predictability of hydrologic response at the plot and catchment scales: Role of initial conditions
,”
Water Resour. Res.
40
,
W10202
, doi: (
2004
).
16.
Y.
Zhang
,
H.
Wei
, and
M. A.
Nearing
, “
Effects of antecedent soil moisture on runoff modeling in small semiarid watersheds of southeastern Arizona
,”
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci.
8
,
6227
(
2011
).
You do not currently have access to this content.