A family of driving forces is discussed in the context of chaos suppression in the Laplace domain. This idea can be attained by increasing the order of the polynomial in the expressions of the driving force to account for the robustness and/or the performance of the closed loop. The motivation arises from the fact that chaotic systems can be controlled by increasing the order of the Laplace controllers even to track arbitrary orbits. However, a larger order in the driving forces can induce an undesirable frequency response, and the control efforts can result in either peaking or large energy accumulation. We overcame these problems by showing that considering the frequency response (interpreted by norms), the closed-loop execution can be improved by designing the feedback suppressor in the Laplace domain. In this manner, the stabilization of the chaotic behavior in jerk-like systems is achieved experimentally. Jerk systems are particularly sensitive to control performance (and robustness issues) because the acceleration time-derivative is involved in their models. Thus, jerky systems are especially helped by a robust control design.

1.
J.
Bricmont
,
Science of Chaos or Chaos of Science?
, in
The Flight from Science and Reason
, edited by
P. R.
Gross
,
N.
Levitt
, and
M. W.
Lewis
(
Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences
, New York,
1998
), Vol.
775
, pp.
131
175
.
2.
N. K.
Hayles
,
Chaos Bound. Orderly Disorder in Contemporary Literature and Science
(
Cornell University Press
, Ithaca, NY,
1990
).
3.
J.
Lu
,
X.
Yu
, and
G.
Chen
,
IEEE Trans. Circuits Syst., I: Fundam. Theory Appl.
50
,
198
207
(
2003
).
4.
D. J.
Christini
and
J. J.
Collins
,
Phys. Rev. E
53
,
R49
R52
(
1996
).
5.
P. P.
Vasil’ev
,
I. H.
White
, and
J.
Gowar
,
Rep. Prog. Phys.
63
,
1997
2042
(
2000
).
6.
B. R.
Adrievskii
and
A. L.
Fradkov
,
Autom. Remote Control (Engl. Transl.)
64
,
673
713
(
2003
).
7.
B. R.
Adrievskii
and
A. L.
Fradkov
,
Autom. Remote Control (Engl. Transl.)
65
,
505
533
(
2004
).
8.
S.
Boccaletti
,
J.
Kurths
,
G.
Osipov
,
D. L.
Valladares
, and
C. S.
Zhou
,
Phys. Rep.
329
,
103
197
(
2000
).
9.
S. M.
Booker
,
Nonlinearity
13
,
145
163
(
2000
).
10.
R.
Femat
,
D.
Capistrán-Tobias
, and
G.
Solís-Perales
,
Phys. Lett. A
252
,
27
36
(
1999
).
11.
C.
Sarasola
,
F. J.
Torrealdea
,
A.
d’Anjou
, and
M.
Graña
,
Math. Comput. Simul.
58
,
309
327
(
2002
).
12.
H.
Puebla
,
J.
Alvarez-Ramírez
, and
I.
Cervantes
,
IEEE Trans. Circuits Syst., I: Fundam. Theory Appl.
50
,
280
284
(
2003
).
13.
Y.
Huh
and
J. S.
Kim
,
Text. Res. J.
74
,
872
878
(
2004
).
14.
M. H.
Dehghani
,
Phys. Rev. D
70
,
064009
(
2004
).
15.
K-S.
Cheng
,
J. Math. Phys.
19
,
1656
1657
(
1978
).
16.
I.
Campos
and
J. L.
Jiménez
,
Am. J. Phys.
57
,
610
613
(
1989
).
17.
C.
Letellier
and
O.
Vallee
,
J. Phys. A
36
,
11229
11245
(
2003
).
18.
S. J.
Linz
,
Phys. Lett. A
275
,
204
210
(
2000
).
19.
R.
Femat
,
J.
Alvarez-Ramirez
,
B.
Castillo-Toledo
, and
J.
Gonzalez
,
IEEE Trans. Circuits Syst., I: Fundam. Theory Appl.
46
,
1150
1152
(
1999
).
20.
J. M.
Malasoma
,
Phys. Lett. A
305
,
52
58
(
2002
).
21.
J. C.
Sprott
,
Phys. Lett. A
266
,
19
23
(
2000
).
22.
L. A.
Aguirre
and
S. A.
Billings
,
J. Nonlinear Sci.
5
,
189
206
(
1995
).
23.
E.
Ott
,
C.
Grebogi
, and
J. A.
Yorke
,
Phys. Rev. Lett.
64
,
1196
1199
(
1990
).
24.
K.
Murali
and
S.
Sinha
,
Phys. Rev. E
68
,
016210
(
2003
).
25.
S.
Rajasekar
,
K.
Murali
, and
M.
Lakshmanan
,
Chaos, Solitons Fractals
8
,
1545
1558
(
1997
).
26.
K.
Pyragas
,
Phys. Lett. A
170
,
421
428
(
1992
).
27.
J.
Alvarez–Ramírez
,
R.
Garrido
, and
R.
Femat
,
Phys. Rev. E
51
,
6235
6238
(
1995
).
28.
R.
Lima
and
M.
Pettini
,
Phys. Rev. Lett.
64
,
1196
1199
(
1990
).
29.
S.
Rajasekar
and
M.
Lakshmanan
,
Phys. Rev. E
51
,
775
778
(
1995
).
30.
B.
Cazelles
,
G.
Boudjema
, and
N. P.
Chau
,
Phys. Lett. A
196
,
326
330
(
1995
).
31.
J.
Alvarez-Ramírez
,
R.
Femat
, and
J.
Gonzalez
,
Phys. Lett. A
211
,
41
45
(
1996
).
32.
C. C.
Chung
and
J.
Hauseer
,
Syst. Control Lett.
30
,
127
137
(
1997
).
33.
G-P.
Jiang
,
G.
Chen
, and
W. K-S.
Tang
,
IEEE Trans. Circuits Syst., I: Fundam. Theory Appl.
49
,
1820
1826
(
2002
).
34.
P. M.
Mäkilä
,
IEEE Trans. Autom. Control
43
,
1265
1267
(
1998
);
L. H.
Keel
and
S. P.
Bhattacharyya
,
IEEE Trans. Autom. Control
43
,
1268
(
1998
);
L. H.
Keel
and
S. P.
Bhattacharyya
,
IEEE Trans. Autom. Control
42
,
1098
1105
(
1997
).
35.
K.
Zhou
and
J. C.
Doyle
,
Essentials of Robust Control
(
Prentice Hall
, Englewood Cliffs, NJ,
1998
).
36.
G. N.
Plass
,
Rev. Mod. Phys.
33
,
37
62
(
1961
).
37.
M.
Luna-Rivera
and
R.
Femat
,
Rev. Mex. Fis.
46
,
429
439
(
2000
) (in Spanish).
38.
S.
Bowong
and
F. C.
Moukam-Kakmeni
,
Phys. Lett. A
316
,
206
217
(
2003
).
39.
F. J.
Martínez-López
, Ms. Sc. thesis,
UASLP
,
2003
, Mexico (in Spanish).
40.
H. K.
Khalil
,
Nonlinear Systems
, 3rd ed. (
Prentice Hall
, Englewood Cliffs, NJ,
2002
).
41.
R. S.
Sánchez-Peña
and
M.
Sznaier
,
Robust Systems Theory and Applications
(
Wiley
,
1998
).
42.
X.
Chen
,
K.
Zhou
, and
J. L.
Aravena
,
SIAM J. Control Optim.
42
,
1960
1971
(
2004
).
You do not currently have access to this content.