Two main challenges are currently present in the healthcare world, i.e., the limitations given by transplantation and the need to have available 3D in vitro models. In this context, bioreactors are devices that have been introduced in tissue engineering as a support for facing the mentioned challenges by mimicking the cellular native microenvironment through the application of physical stimuli. Bioreactors can be divided into two groups based on their final application: macro- and micro-bioreactors, which address the first and second challenge, respectively. The bioreactor design is a crucial step as it determines the way in which physical stimuli are provided to cells. It strongly depends on the manufacturing techniques chosen for the realization. In particular, in bioreactor prototyping, additive manufacturing techniques are widely used nowadays as they allow the fabrication of customized shapes, guaranteeing more degrees of freedom. To support the bioreactor design, a powerful tool is represented by computational simulations that allow to avoid useless approaches of trial-and-error. In the present review, we aim to discuss the general workflow that must be carried out to develop an optimal macro- and micro-bioreactor. Accordingly, we organize the discussion by addressing the following topics: general and stimulus-specific (i.e., perfusion, mechanical, and electrical) requirements that must be considered during the design phase based on the tissue target; computational models as support in designing bioreactors based on the provided stimulus; manufacturing techniques, with a special focus on additive manufacturing techniques; and finally, current applications and new trends in which bioreactors are involved.

1.
Aguilar‐Agon
,
K. W.
et al, “
Mechanical loading stimulates hypertrophy in tissue‐engineered skeletal muscle: Molecular and phenotypic responses
,”
J. Cell. Physiol.
234
(
12
),
23547
23558
(
2019
).
2.
Alessandri
,
K.
et al, “
A 3D printed microfluidic device for production of functionalized hydrogel microcapsules for culture and differentiation of human neuronal stem cells (hNSC)
,”
Lab Chip
16
(
9
),
1593
1604
(
2016
).
3.
Anderson
,
K. B
et al., “
A 3D printed fluidic device that enables integrated features
,”
Anal. Chem.
85
(
12
),
5622
5626
(
2013
).
4.
Au
,
A. K.
et al, “
3D-printed microfluidic automation
,”
Lab Chip
15
(
8
),
1934
1941
(
2015
).
5.
Baas
,
E.
and
Kuiper
,
J. H.
, “
A numerical model of heterogeneous surface strains in polymer scaffolds
,”
J. Biomech.
41
(
6
),
1374
1378
(
2008
).
6.
Baas
,
E.
et al, “
In vitro bone growth responds to local mechanical strain in three-dimensional polymer scaffolds
,”
J. Biomech.
43
(
4
),
733
739
(
2010
).
7.
Badylak
,
S.
,
Taylor
,
F. D.
, and
Uygun
,
K.
, “
Whole-organ tissue engineering: Decellularization and recellularization of three-dimensional matrix scaffolds
,”
Annu. Rev. Biomed. Eng.
13
(
1
),
27
53
(
2011
).
8.
Ball
,
O.
et al, “
3D printed vascular networks enhance viability in high-volume perfusion bioreactor
,”
Ann. Biomed. Eng.
44
,
3435
3445
(
2016
).
9.
Bancroft
,
G. N.
,
Sikavitsas
,
V. I.
, and
Mikos
,
A. G.
, “
Design of a flow perfusion bioreactor system for bone tissue-engineering applications
,”
Tissue Eng.
9
(
3
),
549
554
(
2003
).
10.
Banik
,
B. L.
and
Brown
,
J. L.
, “
3D-printed bioreactor enhances potential for tendon tissue engineering
,”
Regener. Eng. Transl. Med.
6
,
419
428
(
2020
).
11.
Bartis
,
D.
and
Pongracz
,
J.
,
Three Dimensional Tissue Cultures and Tissue Engineering
(
University of Pecz
,
2011
), p.
11
.
12.
Birmingham
,
E.
et al, “
An experimental and computational investigation of bone formation in mechanically loaded trabecular bone explants
,”
Ann. Biomed. Eng.
44
,
1191
1203
(
2016
).
13.
Boschetti
,
F.
et al, “
Prediction of the micro-fluid dynamic environment imposed to three-dimensional engineered cell systems in bioreactors
,”
J. Biomech.
39
(
3
),
418
425
(
2006
).
14.
Byrne
,
D. P.
et al, “
Simulation of tissue differentiation in a scaffold as a function of porosity, Young's modulus and dissolution rate: Application of mechanobiological models in tissue engineering
,”
Biomaterials
28
(
36
),
5544
5554
(
2007
).
15.
Buschmann
,
M. D.
et al, “
Mechanical compression modulates matrix biosynthesis in chondrocyte/agarose culture
,”
J. Cell Sci.
108
(
4
),
1497
1508
(
1995
).
16.
Cabello
,
M.
et al, “
Electrostimulation in an autonomous culture lab-on-chip provides neuroprotection of a retinal explant from a retinitis pigmentosa mouse-model
,”
Sens. Actuators, B
288
,
337
346
(
2019
).
17.
Ching
,
T.
et al, “
Fabrication of integrated microfluidic devices by direct ink writing (DIW) 3D printing
,”
Sens. Actuators, B
297
,
126609
(
2019
).
18.
Cioffi
,
M.
et al, “
Computational evaluation of oxygen and shear stress distributions in 3D perfusion culture systems: Macro-scale and micro-structured models
,”
J. Biomech.
41
(
14
),
2918
2925
(
2008
).
19.
Coplen
,
D. E.
et al, “
Cultured bladder cells and their response to mechanical strain
,” in
Muscle, Matrix, and Bladder Function
(
Springer
,
Boston
,
1995
), pp.
207
214
.
20.
Cortes
,
D.
et al, “
BEaTS-α an open access 3D printed device for in vitro electromechanical stimulation of human induced pluripotent stem cells
,”
Sci. Rep.
10
(
1
),
11274
(
2020
).
21.
Dufour
,
A.
,
Mallein-Gerin
,
F.
, and
Perrier-Groult
,
E.
, “
Direct perfusion improves redifferentiation of human chondrocytes in fibrin hydrogel with the deposition of cartilage pericellular matrix
,”
Appl. Sci.
11
(
19
),
8923
(
2021
).
22.
Fassina
,
L.
et al, “
Effects of electromagnetic stimulation on calcified matrix production by SAOS-2 cells over a polyurethane porous scaffold
,”
Tissue Eng.
12
(
7
),
1985
1999
(
2006
).
23.
Forrestal
,
D. P.
et al, “
Personalized volumetric tissue generation by enhancing multiscale mass transport through 3D printed scaffolds in perfused bioreactors
,”
Adv. Healthcare Mater.
11
,
2200454
(
2022
).
24.
Gaal
,
G.
et al, “
Simplified fabrication of integrated microfluidic devices using fused deposition modeling 3D printing
,”
Sens. Actuators, B
242
,
35
40
(
2016
).
25.
Gabetti
,
S.
et al, “
An automated 3D-printed perfusion bioreactor combinable with pulsed electromagnetic field stimulators for bone tissue investigations
,”
Sci. Rep.
12
(
1
),
13859
(
2022
).
26.
Goldstein
,
A. S.
et al, “
Effect of convection on osteoblastic cell growth and function in biodegradable polymer foam scaffolds
,”
Biomaterials
22
(
11
),
1279
1288
(
2001
).
27.
Gonzalez
,
G.
et al, “
Fabrication and functionalization of 3D printed polydimethylsiloxane‐based microfluidic devices obtained through digital light processing
,”
Adv. Mater. Technol.
5
(
9
),
2000374
(
2020
).
28.
Greenwood
,
H. L.
,
Singer
,
P. A.
,
Downey
,
G. P.
,
Martin
,
D. K.
,
Thorsteinsdóttir
,
H.
, and
Daar
,
A. S.
, “
Regenerative medicine and the developing world
,”
PLoS Med.
3
(
9
),
e381
(
2006
).
29.
He
,
Y.
et al, “
A simplified yet enhanced and versatile microfluidic platform for cyclic cell stretching on an elastic polymer
,”
Biofabrication
12
(
4
),
045032
(
2020
).
30.
Heinonen
,
A.
et al, “
Mineral mass, size, and estimated mechanical strength of triple jumpers' lower limb
,”
Bone
29
(
3
),
279
285
(
2001
).
31.
Hoyle
,
H. W.
,
Stenger
,
C. M. L.
, and
Przyborski
,
S. A.
, “
Design considerations of benchtop fluid flow bioreactors for bio-engineered tissue equivalents in vitro
,”
Biomater. Biosyst.
8
,
100063
(
2022
).
32.
Huang
,
Y.
et al, “
Conductive nanostructured Si biomaterials enhance osteogeneration through electrical stimulation
,”
Mater. Sci. Eng.
C 103
,
109748
(
2019
).
33.
Ingber
,
D.
et al, “
Mechanobiology and diseases of mechanotransduction
,”
Ann. Med.
35
(
8
),
564
577
(
2003
).
34.
Janvier
,
A. J.
,
Canty-Laird
,
E.
, and
Henstock
,
J. R.
, “
A universal multi-platform 3D printed bioreactor chamber for tendon tissue engineering
,”
J. Tissue Eng.
11
,
2041731420942462
(
2020
).
35.
Jing
,
B.
et al, “
Establishment and application of peristaltic human gut-vessel microsystem for studying host–microbial interaction
,”
Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol.
8
,
272
(
2020
).
36.
Kern
,
H.
et al, “
Recovery of long‐term denervated human muscles induced by electrical stimulation
,”
Muscle Nerve
31
(
1
),
98
101
(
2005
).
37.
Kim
,
A.-G.
et al, “
Microfluidic chip with low constant-current stimulation (LCCS) platform: Human nucleus pulposus degeneration in vitro model for symptomatic intervertebral disc
,”
Micromachines
12
(
11
),
1291
(
2021
).
38.
Kim
,
I. S.
et al, “
Novel effect of biphasic electric current on in vitro osteogenesis and cytokine production in human mesenchymal stromal cells
,”
Tissue Eng. Part A
15
(
9
),
2411
2422
(
2009
).
39.
Kim
,
Y.
,
Lee
,
J.
, and
Park
,
S.
, “
A 3D-printed millifluidic platform enabling bacterial preconcentration and DNA purification for molecular detection of pathogens in blood
,”
Micromachines
9
(
9
),
472
(
2018
).
40.
Khodabukus
,
A.
et al, “
Electrical stimulation increases hypertrophy and metabolic flux in tissue-engineered human skeletal muscle
,”
Biomaterials
198
,
259
269
(
2019
).
41.
Kutikhin
,
A. G.
,
Sinitsky
,
M. Y.
,
Yuzhalin
,
A. E.
, and
Velikanova
,
E. A.
, “
Shear stress: An essential driver of endothelial progenitor cells
,”
J. Mol. Cell Cardiol.
118
,
46
69
(
2018
).
42.
Lee
,
W.
et al, “
3D-printed microfluidic device for the detection of pathogenic bacteria using size-based separation in helical channel with trapezoid cross-section
,”
Sci. Rep.
5
(
1
),
7717
(
2015
).
43.
Leppik
,
L.
et al, “
Construction and use of an electrical stimulation chamber for enhancing osteogenic differentiation in mesenchymal stem/stromal cells in vitro
,”
J. Visualized Exp.
143
,
e59127
(
2019
).
44.
Lim
,
D.
et al, “
Bioreactor design and validation for manufacturing strategies in tissue engineering
,”
Bio-des. Manuf.
5
,
43
(
2022
).
45.
Lind
,
J. U.
et al, “
Instrumented cardiac microphysiological devices via multimaterial three-dimensional printing
,”
Nat. Mater.
16
(
3
),
303
308
(
2017
).
46.
Liu
,
B.
et al, “
Multiphysics simulation of a compression–perfusion combined bioreactor to predict the mechanical microenvironment during bone metastatic breast cancer loading experiments
,”
Biotechnol. Bioeng.
118
(
5
),
1779
1792
(
2021
).
47.
Lopez-Canosa
,
A.
et al, “
A microphysiological system combining electrospun fibers and electrical stimulation for the maturation of highly anisotropic cardiac tissue
,”
Biofabrication
13
(
3
),
035047
(
2021
).
48.
Martin
,
I.
,
Wendt
,
D.
, and
Heberer
,
M.
, “
The role of bioreactors in tissue engineering
,”
Trends Biotechnol.
22
(
2
),
80
86
(
2004
).
49.
Martin
,
Y.
and
Vermette
,
P.
, “
Bioreactors for tissue mass culture: Design, characterization, and recent advances
,”
Biomaterials
26
(
35
),
7481
7503
(
2005
).
50.
Mao
,
T.
et al, “
Critical frequency and critical stretching rate for reorientation of cells on a cyclically stretched polymer in a microfluidic chip
,”
ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces
13
(
12
),
13934
13948
(
2021
).
51.
Marconi
,
S.
et al,
3D Printing Technologies and Materials in the Medical Field
(
Bioprinting. Academic Press
,
2022
), pp.
1
17
.
52.
Meneses
,
J.
et al, “
A multimodal stimulation cell culture bioreactor for tissue engineering: A numerical modelling approach
,”
Polymers
12
(
4
),
940
(
2020
).
53.
Milan
,
J.-L.
,
Planell
,
J. A.
, and
Lacroix
,
D.
, “
Simulation of bone tissue formation within a porous scaffold under dynamic compression
,”
Biomech. Model. Mechanobiol.
9
(
5
),
583
596
(
2010
).
54.
Mobini
,
S.
,
Leppik
,
L.
, and
Barker
,
J. H.
, “
Direct current electrical stimulation chamber for treating cells in vitro
,”
Biotechniques
60
(
2
),
95
98
(
2016
).
55.
Modlin
,
M.
et al, “
Electrical stimulation of denervated muscles: First results of a clinical study
,”
Artif. Organs
29
(
3
),
203
206
(
2005
).
56.
Naughton
,
G. K.
, “
From lab bench to market: Critical issues in tissue engineering
,”
Ann. New York Acad. Sci.
961
(
1
),
372
385
(
2002
).
57.
Ott
,
H. C.
et al, “
Perfusion-decellularized matrix: Using nature's platform to engineer a bioartificial heart
,”
Nat. Med.
14
(
2
),
213
221
(
2008
).
58.
Parekh
,
M.
et al, “
Microbioreactor for lower cost and faster optimisation of protein production
,”
Analyst
145
(
18
),
6148
6161
(
2020
).
59.
Pavesi
,
A.
et al, “
Controlled electromechanical cell stimulation on-a-chip
,”
Sci. Rep.
5
(
1
),
11800
(
2015
).
60.
Porter
,
B.
et al, “
3-D computational modeling of media flow through scaffolds in a perfusion bioreactor
,”
J. Biomech.
38
(
3
),
543
549
(
2005
).
61.
Portner
,
R.
et al, “
Bioreactor design for tissue engineering
,”
J. Biosci. Bioeng.
100
(
3
),
235
245
(
2005
).
62.
Prendergast
,
P. J.
,
Huiskes
,
R.
, and
Søballe
,
K.
, “
Biophysical stimuli on cells during tissue differentiation at implant interfaces
,”
J. Biomech.
30
(
6
),
539
548
(
1997
).
63.
Putame
,
G.
et al, “
Compact and tunable stretch bioreactor advancing tissue engineering implementation. Application to engineered cardiac constructs
,”
Med. Eng. Phys.
84
,
1
9
(
2020
).
64.
Radisic
,
M.
et al, “
Functional assembly of engineered myocardium by electrical stimulation of cardiac myocytes cultured on scaffolds
,”
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
101
(
52
),
18129
18134
(
2004
).
65.
Radisic
,
M.
et al, “
Optical mapping of impulse propagation in engineered cardiac tissue
,”
Tissue Eng. Part A
15
(
4
),
851
860
(
2009
).
66.
Ratcliffe
,
A.
and
Niklason
,
L. E.
, “
Bioreactors and bioprocessing for tissue engineering
,”
Ann. New York Acad. Sci.
961
(
1
),
210
215
(
2002
).
67.
Richards
,
D. J.
et al, “
3D printing for tissue engineering
,”
Israel J. Chem.
53
(
9–10
),
805
814
(
2013
).
68.
Rogers
,
C. I.
et al, “
3D printed microfluidic devices with integrated valves
,”
Biomicrofluidics
9
(
1
),
016501
(
2015
).
69.
Rouwkema
,
J.
et al, “
Supply of nutrients to cells in engineered tissues
,”
Biotechnol. Genet. Eng. Rev.
26
(
1
),
163
178
(
2009
).
70.
Saha
,
B.
et al, “
OvCa-Chip microsystem recreates vascular endothelium–mediated platelet extravasation in ovarian cancer
,”
Blood Adv.
4
(
14
),
3329
3342
(
2020
).
71.
Sandino
,
C.
and
Lacroix
,
D.
A dynamical study of the mechanical stimuli and tissue differentiation within a CaP scaffold based on micro-CT finite element models
,”
Biomech. Model. Mechanobiol.
10
(
4
),
565
576
(
2011
).
72.
Sato
,
K.
,
Nitta
,
M.
, and
Ogawa
A.
, “
A microfluidic cell stretch device to investigate the effects of stretching stress on artery smooth muscle cell proliferation in pulmonary arterial hypertension
,”
Inventions
4
(
1
),
1
(
2018
).
73.
Schreivogel
,
S.
et al, “
Load‐induced osteogenic differentiation of mesenchymal stromal cells is caused by mechano‐regulated autocrine signaling
,”
J. Tissue Eng. Regener. Med.
13
(
11
),
1992
2008
(
2019
).
74.
Serena
,
E.
et al, “
Electrical stimulation of human embryonic stem cells: Cardiac differentiation and the generation of reactive oxygen species
,”
Exp. Cell Res.
315
(
20
),
3611
3619
(
2009
).
75.
Sharifi
,
F.
,
Firoozabadi
,
B.
, and
Firoozbakhsh
,
K.
, “
Numerical investigations of hepatic spheroids metabolic reactions in a perfusion bioreactor
,”
Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol.
7
,
221
(
2019
).
76.
Sladkova
,
M.
and
De Peppo
,
G.
, “
Bioreactor systems for human bone tissue engineering
,”
Processes
2
(
2
),
494
525
(
2014
).
77.
Soares
,
J. S.
and
Sacks
,
M. S.
, “
A triphasic constrained mixture model of engineered tissue formation under in vitro dynamic mechanical conditioning
,”
Biomech. Model. Mechanobiol.
15
(
2
),
293
316
(
2016
).
78.
Szklanny
,
A.
et al, “
3D bioprinting of engineered tissue flaps with hierarchical vessel networks (VesselNet) for direct host‐to‐implant perfusion
,”
Adv. Mater.
33
(
42
),
2102661
(
2021
).
79.
Talo
,
G.
et al, “
Industrialization of a perfusion bioreactor: Prime example of a non‐straightforward process
,”
J. Tissue Eng. Regener. Med.
12
(
2
),
405
415
(
2018
).
80.
Tanck
,
E.
et al, “
Increase in bone volume fraction precedes architectural adaptation in growing bone
,”
Bone
28
(
6
),
650
654
(
2001
).
81.
Thrivikraman
,
G.
,
Boda
,
S. K.
, and
Basu
,
B.
, “
Unraveling the mechanistic effects of electric field stimulation towards directing stem cell fate and function: A tissue engineering perspective
,”
Biomaterials
150
,
60
86
(
2018
).
82.
Titushkin
,
I. A.
and
Cho
,
M. R.
, “
Controlling cellular biomechanics of human mesenchymal stem cells
,” in
2009 Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society
(
IEEE
,
2009
).
83.
Tohidnezhad
,
M.
et al, “
Impact of uniaxial stretching on both gliding and traction areas of tendon explants in a novel bioreactor
,”
Int. J. Mol. Sci.
21
(
8
),
2925
(
2020
).
84.
Tunesi
,
M.
et al, “
A miniaturized hydrogel-based in vitro model for dynamic culturing of human cells overexpressing beta-amyloid precursor protein
,”
J. Tissue Eng.
11
,
2041731420945633
(
2020
).
85.
Varone
,
A.
et al, “
A novel organ-chip system emulates three-dimensional architecture of the human epithelia and the mechanical forces acting on it
,”
Biomaterials
275
,
120957
(
2021
).
86.
Visone
,
R.
et al, “
Enhancing all-in-one bioreactors by combining interstitial perfusion, electrical stimulation, on-line monitoring and testing within a single chamber for cardiac constructs
,”
Sci. Rep.
8
(
1
),
16944
(
2018a
).
87.
Visone
,
R.
et al, “
A microscale biomimetic platform for generation and electro-mechanical stimulation of 3D cardiac microtissues
,”
APL Bioeng.
2
(
4
),
046102
(
2018b
).
88.
Wang
,
Y.
et al, “
3D printed micro-mechanical device (MMD) for in situ tensile testing of micro/nanowires
,”
Extreme Mech. Lett.
33
,
100575
(
2019
).
89.
Wu
,
G.
et al, “
A bioartificial liver support system integrated with a DLM/GelMA-based bioengineered whole liver for prevention of hepatic encephalopathy via enhanced ammonia reduction
,”
Biomater. Sci.
8
(
10
),
2814
2824
(
2020
).
90.
Zhao
,
M.
et al, “
Electrical stimulation directly induces pre-angiogenic responses in vascular endothelial cells by signaling through VEGF receptors
,”
J. Cell Sci.
117
(
3
),
397
405
(
2004
).
You do not currently have access to this content.