Cell-secreted soluble factor signaling in a diffusion dominant microenvironment plays an important role on early stage differentiation of pluripotent stem cells invivo. In this study, we utilized a membrane-based two-chambered microbioreactor (MB) to differentiate mouse embryonic stem cells (mESCs) in a diffusion dominant microenvironment of the top chamber while providing enough nutrient through the bottom chamber. Speculating that accumulated FGF4 in the small top chamber will augment neuronal differentiation in the MB culture, we first differentiated mESCs for 8 days by using a chemically optimized culture medium for neuronal induction. However, comparison of cellular morphology and expression of neuronal markers in the MB with that in the 6-well plate (6WP) indicated relatively lower neuronal differentiation in the MB culture. Therefore, to investigate whether microenvironment in the MB facilitates non-neuronal differentiation, we differentiated mESCs for 8 days by using chemically defined basal medium. In this case, differentiated cell morphology differed markedly between the MB and 6WP cultures: epithelial sheet-like morphology in the MB, whereas rosette morphology in the 6WP. Expression of markers from the three germ layers indicated lower neuronal but higher meso- and endo-dermal differentiation of mESCs in the MB than the 6WP culture. Moreover, among various cell-secreted soluble factors, BMP4 expression was remarkably upregulated in the MB culture. Inhibition of BMP4 signaling demonstrated that enhanced effect of upregulated BMP4 was responsible for the prominent meso- and endo-dermal differentiation in the MB. However, in the 6WP, downregulated BMP4 had a minimal influence on the differentiation behavior. Our study demonstrated utilization of a microbioreactor to modulate the effect of cell-secreted soluble factors by autoregulation and thereby inducing alternative self-capability of mESCs. Understanding and implementation of autoregulation of soluble factors similar to this study will lead to the development of robust culture systems to control ESC behavior.

1.
C. M.
Metallo
,
J. C.
Mohr
,
C. J.
Detzel
,
J. J.
de Pablo
,
B. J. V.
Wie
, and
S. P.
Palecek
,
Biotechnol. Prog.
23
,
18
(
2007
).
2.
3.
R. E.
Davey
and
P. W.
Zandstra
,
Stem Cells
24
,
2538
(
2006
).
4.
B. C.
Heng
,
T.
Cao
,
H. K.
Haider
,
D. Z. M.
Wang
,
E. K.-W.K.-W.
Sim
, and
S. C.
Ng
,
Cell Tissue Res.
315
,
291
(
2004
).
5.
M. V.
Wiles
and
G.
Proetzel
, in
Embryonic Stem Cells: A Practical Approach
, edited by
E.
Notarianni
and
M. J.
Evans
(
Oxford University Press
,
New York
,
2006
), pp.
112
119
.
6.
H.
Yu
,
I.
Meyvantsson
,
I. A.
Shkel
, and
D. J.
Beebe
,
Lab Chip
5
,
1089
(
2005
).
7.
E.
Figallo
,
C.
Cannizzaro
,
S.
Gerecht
,
J. A.
Burdick
,
R.
Langer
,
N.
Elvassore
, and
G.
Vunjak-Novakovic
,
Lab Chip
7
,
710
(
2007
).
8.
W.-T.
Fung
,
A.
Beyzavi
,
P.
Abgrall
,
N.-T.
Nguyen
, and
H.-Y.
Li
,
Lab Chip
9
,
2591
(
2009
).
9.
J.
Park
,
C. H.
Cho
,
N.
Parashurama
,
Y.
Li
,
F.
Berthiaume
,
M.
Toner
,
A. W.
Tilles
, and
M. L.
Yarmush
,
Lab Chip
7
,
1018
(
2007
).
10.
Y.-S.
Hwang
,
B. G.
Chung
,
D.
Ortmann
,
N.
Hattori
,
H.-C.
Moeller
, and
A.
Khademhosseini
,
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.
106
,
16978
(
2009
).
11.
M. M.
Chowdhury
,
T.
Katsuda
,
K.
Montagne
,
H.
Kimura
,
N.
Kojima
,
H.
Akutsu
,
T.
Ochiya
,
T.
Fujii
, and
Y.
Sakai
,
Biomed. Microdevices
12
,
1097
(
2010
).
12.
W. C.
Smith
and
R. M.
Harland
,
Cell
70
,
829
(
1992
).
13.
14.
A.
Spandidos
,
X.
Wang
,
H.
Wang
, and
B.
Seed
, Nucleic Acids Res. 38 (Database issue), D792 (
2010
).
15.
J. M.
Ruijter
,
C.
Ramakers
,
W. M. H.
Hoogaars
,
Y.
Karlen
,
O.
Bakker
,
M. J. B.
van den Hoff
, and
A. F. M.
Moorman
,
Nucleic Acids Res.
37
,
e45
, doi: (
2009
).
16.
M. W.
Pfaffl
,
A.
Tichopad
,
C.
Prgomet
, and
T. P.
Neuvians
,
Biotechnol. Lett.
26
,
509
(
2004
).
17.
H.
Niwa
,
J.
Miyazaki
, and
A. G.
Smith
,
Nat. Genet.
24
,
372
(
2000
).
18.
Q. L.
Ying
,
J.
Wray
,
J.
Nichols
,
L.
Batlle
-Morera,
B.
Doble
,
J.
Woodgett
,
P.
Cohen
, and
A.
Smith
,
Nature
453
,
519
(
2008
).
19.
Q.-L.
Ying
,
M.
Stavridis
,
D.
Griffiths
,
M.
Li
, and
A.
Smith
,
Nat. Biotechnol.
21
,
183
(
2003
).
20.
I. A.
Bouhon
,
H.
Kato
,
S.
Chandran
, and
N. D.
Allen
,
Brain Res. Bull.
68
,
62
(
2005
).
21.
T.
Kunath
,
M. K. S.
El-Leil
,
M.
Almousailleakh
,
J.
Wray
,
S.
Meloche
, and
A.
Smith
,
Development
134
,
2895
(
2007
).
22.
N.
Lenka
and
S. K.
Ramasamy
,
PLoS One
2
,
e1349
(
2007
).
23.
E.
Abranches
,
M.
Silva
,
L.
Pradier
,
H.
Schulz
,
O.
Hummel
,
D.
Henrique
, and
E.
Bekman
,
PLoS One
4
,
e6286
(
2009
).
24.
P.
Gadue
,
T. L.
Huber
,
M. C.
Nostro
,
S.
Kattman
, and
G. M.
Keller
,
Exp. Hematol.
33
,
955
(
2005
).
25.
B. M.
Johansson
and
M. V.
Wiles
,
Mol. Cell. Biol.
15
,
141
(
1995
).
26.
K.
Zhang
,
L.
Li
,
C.
Huang
,
C.
Shen
,
F.
Tan
,
C.
Xia
,
P.
Liu
,
J.
Rossant
, and
N.
Jing
,
Development
137
,
2095
(
2010
).
27.
G.
Winnier
,
M.
Blessing
,
P. A.
Labosky
, and
B. L.
Hogan
,
Genes Dev.
9
,
2105
(
1995
).
28.
C. M.
Jones
,
K. M.
Lyons
, and
B. L.
Hogan
,
Development
111
,
531
(
1991
).
29.
M.
Yasunaga
,
S.
Tada
,
S.
Torikai
-Nishikawa,
Y.
Nakano
,
M.
Okada
,
L. M.
Jakt
,
S.
Nishikawa
,
T.
Chiba
,
T.
Era
, and
S.-I.
Nishikawa
,
Nat. Biotechnol.
23
,
1542
(
2005
).
30.
J.
Heo
,
J.-S.
Lee
,
I.-S.
Chu
,
Y.
Takahama
, and
S. S.
Thorgeirsson
,
Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.
332
,
1061
(
2005
).
You do not currently have access to this content.