This study presented a platform of multiplex fluorescence detection of single-cell droplet microfluidics with demonstrative applications in quantifying protein expression levels. The platform of multiplex fluorescence detection mainly included optical paths adopted from conventional microscopy enabling the generation of three optical spots from three laser sources for multiple fluorescence excitation and capture of multiple fluorescence signals by four photomultiplier tubes. As to platform characterization, microscopic images of three optical spots were obtained where clear Gaussian distributions of intensities without skewness confirmed the functionality of the scanning lens, while the controllable distances among three optical spots validated the functionality of fiber collimators and the reflector lens. As to demonstration, this platform was used to quantify single-cell protein expression within droplets where four-type protein expression of α-tubulin, Ras, c-Myc, and β-tubulin of CAL 27 (Ncell = 1921) vs WSU-HN6 (Ncell = 1881) were quantitatively estimated, which were (2.85 ± 0.72) × 105 vs (4.83 ± 1.58) × 105, (3.69 ± 1.41) × 104 vs (5.07 ± 2.13) × 104, (5.90 ± 1.45) × 104 vs (9.57 ± 2.85) × 104, and (3.84 ± 1.28) × 105 vs (3.30 ± 1.10) × 105, respectively. Neural pattern recognition was utilized for the classification of cell types, achieving successful rates of 69.0% (α-tubulin), 75.4% (Ras), 89.1% (c-Myc), 65.8% (β-tubulin), and 99.1% in combination, validating the capability of this platform of multiplex fluorescence detection to quantify various types of single-cell proteins, which could provide comprehensive evaluations on cell status.
REFERENCES
1.
D.
Liu
et al, “Single-cell droplet microfluidics for biomedical applications
,” Analyst
147
(11
), 2294
–2316
(2022
). 2.
B.
Li
et al, “Droplets microfluidics platform—A tool for single cell research
,” Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol.
11
, 1121870
(2023
). 3.
S.
Neun
et al, “Single-cell activity screening in microfluidic droplets
,” Methods Enzymol.
628
, 95
–112
(2019
). 4.
K.
Matuła
et al, “Single-cell analysis using droplet microfluidics
,” Adv. Biosyst.
4
(1
), 1900188
(2020
). 5.
X. J.
Li
et al, “A simple and fast microfluidic approach of same-single-cell analysis (SASCA) for the study of multidrug resistance modulation in cancer cells
,” Lab Chip
11
, 1378
–1384
(2011
). 6.
F.
Shen
et al, “Study of flow behaviors on single-cell manipulation and shear stress reduction in microfluidic chips using computational fluid dynamics simulations
,” Biomicrofluidics
8
, 014109
(2014
). 7.
R. C.
Jones
et al, “The Tabula Sapiens: A multiple-organ, single-cell transcriptomic atlas of humans
,” Science
376
, 711
(2022
).8.
E. X.
Ng
et al, “Single cell multiplexed assay for proteolytic activity using droplet microfluidics
,” Biosens. Bioelectron.
81
, 408
–414
(2016
). 9.
R.
Shen
et al, “Sensitive detection of single-cell secreted H2O2 by integrating a microfluidic droplet sensor and Au nanoclusters
,” Anal. Chem.
90
(7
), 4478
–4484
(2018
). 10.
Z.
Yu
et al, “Sensitive detection of MMP9 enzymatic activities in single cell-encapsulated microdroplets as an assay of cancer cell invasiveness
,” ACS Sens.
2
(5
), 626
–634
(2017
). 11.
J.
Panwar
et al, “Fluorescence crosstalk reduction by modulated excitation-synchronous acquisition for multispectral analysis in high-throughput droplet microfluidics
,” Lab Chip
23
(11
), 2514
–2520
(2023
). 12.
S.
Turkcan
et al, “Single-cell analysis of [18F]fluorodeoxyglucose uptake by droplet radiofluidics
,” Anal. Chem.
87
(13
), 6667
–6673
(2015
). 13.
D.
Sengupta
et al, “Multiplexed single-cell measurements of FDG uptake and lactate release using droplet microfluidics
,” Technol. Cancer Res. Treat.
18
, 1533
–1546
(2019
).14.
M. E.
Gallina
et al, “Toward a droplet-based single-cell radiometric assay
,” Anal. Chem.
89
(12
), 6472
–6481
(2017
). 15.
M. R.
Willner
et al, “Surface-enhanced Raman scattering based microfluidics for single-cell analysis
,” Anal. Chem.
90
(20
), 12004
–12010
(2018
).16.
D.
Sun
et al, “Label-free detection of multiplexed metabolites at single-cell level via a SERS-microfluidic droplet platform
,” Anal. Chem.
91
(24
), 15484
–15490
(2019
). 17.
S. C.
Wei
et al, “Plasmonic droplet screen for single-cell secretion analysis
,” Biosens. Bioelectron.
144
, 111639
(2019
). 18.
H.
Tavakoli
et al, “Recent advances in microfluidic platforms for single-cell analysis in cancer biology, diagnosis and therapy
,” TrAC, Trends Anal. Chem.
117
, 13
–26
(2019
). 19.
W.
Zhou
et al, “Recent innovations in cost-effective polymer and paper hybrid microfluidic devices
,” Lab Chip
21
, 2658
–2683
(2021
). 20.
I.
Kavitha
et al, “Surface plasmon resonance tunable gold nanostar synthesis in a symmetric flow-focusing droplet device
,” Surf. Interfaces
36
, 102478
(2022
). 21.
W. Y.
Chu
et al, “Partially miscible droplet microfluidics to enhance interfacial adsorption of hydrophilic nanoparticles for colloidosome synthesis
,” Chem. Eng. J.
471
, 144223
(2023
). 22.
H.
Wang
et al, “A facile droplet-chip-time-resolved inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry online system for determination of zinc in single cell
,” Anal. Chem.
89
(9
), 4931
–4938
(2017
). 23.
N. S.
Ha
et al, “Faster, better, and cheaper: Harnessing microfluidics and mass spectrometry for biotechnology
,” RSC Chem. Biol.
2
(5
), 1331
–1351
(2021
). 24.
L.
Cohen
et al, “Single molecule protein detection with attomolar sensitivity using droplet digital enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay
,” ACS Nano
14
, 9491
–9501
(2020
). 25.
P.
Juhwan
et al, “Beads- and oil-free single molecule assay with immuno-rolling circle amplification for detection of SARS-CoV-2 from saliva
,” Biosens. Bioelectron.
232
, 115316
(2023
). 26.
L.
Cong
et al, “Single-cell VEGF analysis by fluorescence imaging–microfluidic droplet platform: An immunosandwich strategy on the cell surface
,” Anal. Chem.
94
(17
), 6591
–6598
(2022
). 27.
N.
Shembekar
et al, “Single-cell droplet microfluidic screening for antibodies specifically binding to target cells
,” Cell Rep.
22
(8
), 2206
–2215
(2018
). 28.
G.
Yang
et al, “Quantitative flow cytometry leveraging droplet-based constriction microchannels with high reliability and high sensitivity
,” Cytometry Part A
103
(5
), 429
–438
(2023
). 29.
S.
Iyer
et al, “Quantitation of CD38 expression using QuantiBRITE (TM) beads
,” Cytometry
33
(2
), 206
–212
(1998
). 30.
L.
Wang
et al, “Quantitative flow cytometry measurements in antibodies bound per cell based on a CD4 reference
,” Curr. Protoc. Cytom.
75
(1
), 1291
–1294
(2016
). 31.
B.
Randlev
et al, “Validation of a quantitative flow cytometer assay for monitoring HER2/neu expression level in cell-based cancer immunotherapy products
,” Biologicals
38
(2
), 249
–259
(2010
). 32.
M.
Rhiannon
et al, “Quantitation of Lan antigen in Lan+, Lan+(w) and Lan− phenotypes
,” Blood Transfus.
13
(4
), 662
–665
(2015
).33.
P.
Andrew
et al, “An antibody-drug conjugate targeting a tumor selective EGFR epitope
,” Mol. Cancer
15
(4
), 661
–669
(2016
). 34.
T.
Benjamin
et al, “Cells and cell lysates: A direct approach for engineering antibodies against membrane proteins using yeast surface display
,” Methods
60
(1
), 27
–37
(2013
). 35.
T.
Prashant
et al, “Quantification of expression of antigens targeted by antibody-based therapy in chronic lymphocytic leukemia
,” Am. J. Clin. Pathol.
140
(6
), 813
–818
(2013
). 36.
C.
Pramoda
et al, “Utility of quantitative flow cytometry immunophenotypic analysis of CD5 expression in small B-cell neoplasms
,” Arch. Pathol. Lab. Med.
138
(7
), 903
–909
(2014
). 37.
S. L.
Morey
et al, “Development of a flow cytometric method for quantification of BCL-2 family members in chronic lymphocytic leukemia and correlation with sensitivity to BCL-2 family inhibitors
,” Cytometry, Part B
92
(5
), 331
–339
(2017
). 38.
X. F.
Li
et al, “A microfluidic flow cytometer enabling absolute quantification of single-cell intracellular proteins
,” Lab Chip
17
(18
), 3129
–3137
(2016
). 39.
L. X.
Liu
et al, “Development of microfluidic platform capable of high-throughput absolute quantification of single-cell multiple intracellular proteins from tumor cell lines and patient tumor samples
,” Biosens. Bioelectron.
155
, 112097
(2020
). 40.
W.
Na
et al, “Development of droplet microfluidics enabling high-throughput single-cell analysis
,” Molecules
21
(5
), 881
(2016
). 41.
Z.
Zhu
et al, “Hydrogel droplet microfluidics for high-throughput single molecule/cell analysis
,” Acc. Chem. Res.
50
(1
), 22
–31
(2017
). 42.
D. B.
Fabio
et al, “A method for detecting circulating tumor cells based on the measurement of single-cell metabolism in droplet-based microfluidics
,” Angew. Chem., Int. Ed.
55
(30
), 8581
–8584
(2016
). 43.
M. N.
Hsu
et al, “Smart hydrogel microfluidics for single-cell multiplexed secretomic analysis with high sensitivity
,” Small
14
(49
), 1802918
(2018
). 44.
C. W.
Kan
et al, “Digital enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays with sub-attomolar detection limits based on low numbers of capture beads combined with high efficiency bead analysis
,” Lab Chip
20
(12
), 2122
–2135
(2020
). 45.
X. Y.
Yue
et al, “Breaking through the Poisson distribution: A compact high-efficiency droplet microfluidic system for single-bead encapsulation and digital immunoassay detection
,” Biosens. Bioelectron.
211
, 114384
(2022
). 46.
See supplementary material at https://www.scitation.org/doi/suppl/10.1063/5.0179121 for the calibration curves and fluorescence images of CAL 27 cells.
© 2023 Author(s). Published under an exclusive license by AIP Publishing.
2023
Author(s)
You do not currently have access to this content.
