Microfluidic cell sorting has shown promising advantages over traditional bulky cell sorting equipment and has demonstrated wide-reaching applications in biological research and medical diagnostics. The most important characteristics of a microfluidic cell sorter are its throughput, ease of use, and integration of peripheral equipment onto the chip itself. In this review, we discuss the six most common methods for pumping fluid samples in microfluidic cell sorting devices, present their advantages and drawbacks, and discuss notable examples of their use. Syringe pumps are the most commonly used method for fluid actuation in microfluidic devices because they are easily accessible but they are typically too bulky for portable applications, and they may produce unfavorable flow characteristics. Peristaltic pumps, both on- and off-chip, can produce reversible flow but they suffer from pulsatile flow characteristics, which may not be preferable in many scenarios. Gravity-driven pumping, and similarly hydrostatic pumping, require no energy input but generally produce low throughputs. Centrifugal flow is used to sort cells on the basis of size or density but requires a large external rotor to produce centrifugal force. Electroosmotic pumping is appealing because of its compact size but the high voltages required for fluid flow may be incompatible with live cells. Emerging methods with potential for applications in cell sorting are also discussed. In the future, microfluidic cell sorting methods will trend toward highly integrated systems with high throughputs and low sample volume requirements.
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
September 2023
Review Article|
September 18 2023
Microfluidic pumps for cell sorting
Leyla Akh
;
Leyla Akh
(Conceptualization, Visualization, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing)
1
Biomedical Engineering Program, University of Colorado
, Boulder, Colorado 80309, USA
Search for other works by this author on:
Diane Jung
;
Diane Jung
(Writing – original draft)
1
Biomedical Engineering Program, University of Colorado
, Boulder, Colorado 80309, USA
Search for other works by this author on:
William Frantz
;
William Frantz
(Writing – original draft)
1
Biomedical Engineering Program, University of Colorado
, Boulder, Colorado 80309, USA
Search for other works by this author on:
Corrin Bowman
;
Corrin Bowman
(Writing – original draft)
1
Biomedical Engineering Program, University of Colorado
, Boulder, Colorado 80309, USA
Search for other works by this author on:
Anika C. Neu
;
Anika C. Neu
(Writing – original draft)
2
Paul M. Rady Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Colorado
, Boulder, Colorado 80309, USA
Search for other works by this author on:
Xiaoyun Ding
Xiaoyun Ding
a)
(Conceptualization, Supervision, Writing – review & editing)
1
Biomedical Engineering Program, University of Colorado
, Boulder, Colorado 80309, USA
2
Paul M. Rady Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Colorado
, Boulder, Colorado 80309, USA
3
BioFrontiers Institute, University of Colorado
, Boulder, Colorado 80309, USA
a)Author to whom correspondence should be addressed: xiaoyun.ding@colorado.edu
Search for other works by this author on:
a)Author to whom correspondence should be addressed: xiaoyun.ding@colorado.edu
Biomicrofluidics 17, 051502 (2023)
Article history
Received:
June 08 2023
Accepted:
September 05 2023
Citation
Leyla Akh, Diane Jung, William Frantz, Corrin Bowman, Anika C. Neu, Xiaoyun Ding; Microfluidic pumps for cell sorting. Biomicrofluidics 1 September 2023; 17 (5): 051502. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0161223
Download citation file:
Sign in
Don't already have an account? Register
Sign In
You could not be signed in. Please check your credentials and make sure you have an active account and try again.
Sign in via your Institution
Sign in via your InstitutionPay-Per-View Access
$40.00
280
Views