The T-shaped microchannel system is used to mix similar or different fluids, and the laminar flow nature makes the mixing at the entrance junction region a challenging task. Acoustic streaming is a steady vortical flow phenomenon that can be produced in the microchannel by oscillating acoustic transducer around the sharp edge tip structure. In this study, the acoustic streaming is produced using a triangular structure with tip angles of 22.62°, 33.4°, and 61.91°, which is placed at the entrance junction region and mixes the inlets flow from two directions. The acoustic streaming flow patterns were investigated using micro-particle image velocimetry (μPIV) in various tip edge angles, flow rate, oscillation frequency, and amplitude. The velocity and vorticity profiles show that a pair of counter-rotating streaming vortices were created around the sharp triangle structure and raised the Z vorticity up to 10 times more than the case without acoustic streaming. The mixing experiments were performed by using fluorescent green dye solution and de-ionized water and evaluated its performance with the degree of mixing (M) at different amplitudes, flow rates, frequencies, and tip edge angles using the grayscale value of pixel intensity. The degree of mixing characterized was found significantly improved to 0.769 with acoustic streaming from 0.4017 without acoustic streaming, in the case of 0.008 μl/min flow rate and 38 V oscillation amplitude at y = 2.15 mm. The results suggested that the creation of acoustic streaming around the entrance junction region promotes the mixing of two fluids inside the microchannel, which is restricted by the laminar flow conditions.

1.
Z.
Yang
 et al., “
Ultrasonic micromixer for microfluidic systems
,”
Sens. Actuators A
93
(
3
),
266
272
(
2001
).
2.
H. H.
Bau
 et al., “
A minute magneto hydro dynamic (MHD) mixer
,”
Sens. Actuators B
79
(
2–3
),
207
215
(
2001
).
3.
S. G.
Kandlikar
,
Heat Transfer and Fluid Flow in Minichannels and Microchannels
(
Elsevier B.V.
,
Amsterdam
,
2006
), p.
450
.
4.
D.
Caprini
 et al., “
A T-junction device allowing for two simultaneous orthogonal views: Application to bubble formation and break-up
,”
Microfluid. Nanofluid.
22
(
8
),
85
(
2018
).
5.
P.
Garstecki
 et al., “
Formation of droplets and bubbles in a microfluidic T-junction-scaling and mechanism of break-up
,”
Lab Chip
6
(
3
),
437
446
(
2006
).
6.
Y.
Hu
 et al., “
Millisecond mixing of liquids using a novel jet nozzle
,”
Chem. Eng. Sci.
64
(
5
),
812
820
(
2009
).
7.
B.
Srinivasan
 et al., “
Performance evaluation of a pneumatic-based micromixer for bioconjugation reaction
,” in
2010 IEEE 5th International Conference on Nano/Micro Engineered and Molecular Systems
, 20–23 January 2010 (IEEE, Xiamen, China,
2010
).
8.
S. H.
Wong
,
M. C. L.
Ward
, and
C. W.
Wharton
, “
Micro T-mixer as a rapid mixing micromixer
,”
Sens. Actuators B
100
(
3
),
359
379
(
2004
).
9.
M.
Engler
 et al., “
Numerical and experimental investigations on liquid mixing in static micromixers
,”
Chem. Eng. J.
101
,
315
322
(
2004
).
10.
M.
Hoffmann
,
M.
Schlüter
, and
N.
Räbiger
, “
Experimental investigation of liquid–liquid mixing in T-shaped micro-mixers using μ-LIF and μ-PIV
,”
Chem. Eng. Sci.
61
(
9
),
2968
2976
(
2006
).
11.
J. S.
Bach
and
H.
Bruus
, “
Suppression of acoustic streaming in shape-optimized channels
,”
Phys. Rev. Lett.
124
(
21
),
214501
(
2020
).
12.
B. R.
Lutz
,
J.
Chen
, and
D. T.
Schwartz
, “
Microscopic steady streaming eddies created around short cylinders in a channel: Flow visualization and Stokes layer scaling
,”
Phys. Fluids
17
(
2
),
023601
(
2005
).
13.
P.
Marmottant
 et al., “
Microfluidics with ultrasound-driven bubbles
,”
J. Fluid Mech.
568
,
109
118
(
2006
).
14.
D.
Ahmed
 et al., “
A millisecond micromixer via single-bubble-based acoustic streaming
,”
Lab Chip
9
(
18
),
2738
2741
(
2009
).
15.
B. R.
Lutz
,
J.
Chen
, and
D. T.
Schwartz
, “
Hydrodynamic tweezers:  1. Noncontact trapping of single cells using steady streaming microeddies
,”
Anal. Chem.
78
(
15
),
5429
5435
(
2006
).
16.
P. B.
Muller
 et al., “
Ultrasound-induced acoustophoretic motion of microparticles in three dimensions
,”
Phys. Rev. E
88
(
2
),
023006
(
2013
).
17.
H.
Bruus
,
Theoretical Microfluidics
(Oxford University Press, 2008), Vol. 18.
18.
M.
Ovchinnikov
,
J.
Zhou
, and
S.
Yalamanchili
, “
Acoustic streaming of a sharp edge
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
136
(
1
),
22
29
(
2014
).
19.
Y.-S.
Liou
,
X.-J.
Kang
, and
W.-H.
Tien
, “
Particle aggregation and flow patterns induced by ultrasonic standing wave and acoustic streaming: An experimental study by PIV and PTV
,”
Exp. Therm. Fluid Sci.
106
,
78
86
(
2019
).
20.
N.
Nama
 et al., “
Numerical study of acoustophoretic motion of particles in a PDMS microchannel driven by surface acoustic waves
,”
Lab Chip
15
(
12
),
2700
2709
(
2015
).
21.
N.
Nama
 et al., “
Investigation of micromixing by acoustically oscillated sharp-edges
,”
Biomicrofluidics
10
(
2
),
024124
(
2016
).
22.
C.
Suri
 et al., “
Experimental study of a new liquid mixing method using acoustic streaming
,”
J. Chem. Eng. Jpn.
35
(
6
),
497
502
(
2002
).
23.
P. H.
Huang
 et al., “
An acoustofluidic micromixer based on oscillating sidewall sharp-edges
,”
Lab Chip
13
(
19
),
3847
3852
(
2013
).
24.
C.
Zhang
 et al., “
Acoustic streaming near a sharp structure and its mixing performance characterization
,”
Microfluid. Nanofluid.
23
(
9
),
104
(
2019
).
25.
H.
Lim
 et al., “
Acoustic mixing in a dome-shaped chamber-based SAW (DC-SAW) device
,”
Lab Chip
20
(
1
),
120
125
(
2020
).
26.
F.
Guo
 et al., “
Probing cell–cell communication with microfluidic devices
,”
Lab Chip
13
(
16
),
3152
3162
(
2013
).
27.
S.
Wang
 et al., “
Piezoelectric microchip for cell lysis through cell–microparticle collision within a microdroplet driven by surface acoustic wave oscillation
,”
Small
15
(
9
),
1804593
(
2019
).
28.
M. R.
Rasouli
and
M.
Tabrizian
, “
An ultra-rapid acoustic micromixer for synthesis of organic nanoparticles
,”
Lab Chip
19
(
19
),
3316
3325
(
2019
).
29.
C.
Xu
 et al., “
Acoustomicrofluidic synthesis of hierarchically porous metal-organic frameworks
,”
Mater. Lett.
285
,
129052
(
2021
).
30.
T.
Zheng
 et al., “
Ultrafast crystallization hollow nanocrystals of the resorcinarene hexamer in microfluidic via standing surface acoustic waves (SSAWs)
,”
Mater. Lett.
263
,
127274
(
2020
).
31.
K.
Rodaree
 et al., “
DNA hybridization enhancement using piezoelectric microagitation through a liquid coupling medium
,”
Lab Chip
11
,
1059
1064
(
2011
).
32.
B.
Loh
 et al., “
Acoustic streaming induced by ultrasonic flexural vibrations and associated enhancement of convective heat transfer
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
111
,
875
883
(
2002
).
33.
V.
Mengeaud
,
J.
Josserand
, and
H. H.
Girault
, “
Mixing processes in a zigzag microchannel: Finite element simulations and optical study
,”
Anal. Chem.
74
(
16
),
4279
4286
(
2002
).
34.
H.
Wang
 et al., “
Optimizing layout of obstacles for enhanced mixing in microchannels
,”
Smart Mater. Struct.
11
(
5
),
662
667
(
2002
).
35.
S. W.
Huang
 et al., “
Fluid mixing in a swirl-inducing microchannel with square and T-shaped cross-sections
,”
Microsyst. Technol.
23
(
6
),
1971
1981
(
2017
).
36.
Y.
Xia
and
G. M.
Whitesides
, “
Soft lithography
,”
Annu. Rev. Mater. Sci.
28
(
1
),
153
184
(
1998
).
37.
J.
Westerweel
,
P. F.
Geelhoed
, and
R.
Lindken
, “
Single-pixel resolution ensemble correlation for micro-PIV applications
,”
Exp. Fluids
37
(
3
),
375
384
(
2004
).
38.
J.
Boss
, “
Evaluation of the homogeneity degree of a mixture
,”
Bulk Solids Handl.
6
(
6
),
1207
1215
(
1986
).
39.
T.
Jordan
 et al., “
Electrical properties and power considerations of a piezoelectric actuator
,”
MRS Proc.
604
, 203–208 (
2000
).
You do not currently have access to this content.