Polarization of the ion-selective systems results in the formation of ion-depleted and ion-concentrated zones in the electrolyte layers adjacent to the system. One can employ ion-concentration polarization for the removal of charged large molecules and small ions from the flowing liquid. Removal of large molecules from the flowing solution and their local accumulation is often referred to as preconcentration, removal of small ions as desalination. Here, we study the effect of the channel geometry on the removal of charged species from their water solutions experimentally. Straight, converging, and diverging channels equipped with a pair of heterogeneous cation-exchange membranes are compared in terms of their effect on preconcentration of an observable fluorescein dye and on desalination of water solution of potassium chloride. Our results show that preconcentration of the dye is not significantly affected by the channel geometry. The distance of the preconcentration band from one of the membranes was approximately the same in all tested channel geometries. The major difference was in the location of the band within the channel, when the conical channels localized the band at one of the channel walls. The straight channel showed a slightly broader range of applicable flow rates. The semibatch desalination of 0.01M KCl solution turned out to be more efficient in conical channels, which was associated with a larger volume of the channel available for the accumulation of the concentrated solution. Our results suggest that conical channels can be advantageously used in transforming the ion-concentration-polarization-based semibatch desalination into a fully continuous one.
REFERENCES
1.
A.
Holtzel
and U.
Tallarek
, “Ionic conductance of nanopores in microscale analysis systems: Where microfluldics meets nanofluidics
,” J. Sep. Sci.
30
(10
), 1398
–1419
(2007
). 2.
A. S.
Khair
and T. M.
Squires
, “Fundamental aspects of concentration polarization arising from nonuniform electrokinetic transport [Phys. Fluids 20, 087102 (2008)]
,” Phys. Fluids
20
(12
), 129901
(2008
). 3.
J. J.
Krol
, M.
Wessling
, and H.
Strathmann
, “Concentration polarization with monopolar ion exchange membranes: Current-voltage curves and water dissociation
,” J. Membr. Sci.
162
(1-2
), 145
–154
(1999
). 4.
Y. C.
Wang
, A. L.
Stevens
, and J. Y.
Han
, “Million-fold preconcentration of proteins and peptides by nanofluidic filter
,” Anal. Chem.
77
(14
), 4293
–4299
(2005
). 5.
J. H.
Lee
, Y. A.
Song
, and J. Y.
Han
, “Multiplexed proteomic sample preconcentration device using surface-patterned ion-selective membrane
,” Lab Chip
8
(4
), 596
–601
(2008
). 6.
R. J.
Meagher
and N.
Thaitrong
, “Microchip electrophoresis of DNA following preconcentration at photopatterned gel membranes
,” Electrophoresis
33
(8
), 1236
–1246
(2012
). 7.
Z.
Slouka
et al, “Integrated, DC voltage-driven nucleic acid diagnostic platform for real sample analysis: Detection of oral cancer
,” Talanta
145
, 35
–42
(2015
). 8.
S. J.
Kim
, Y. A.
Song
, and J.
Han
, “Nanofluidic concentration devices for biomolecules utilizing ion concentration polarization: Theory, fabrication, and applications
,” Chem. Soc. Rev.
39
(3
), 912
–922
(2010
). 9.
M.
Li
and R. K.
Anand
, “Recent advancements in ion concentration polarization
,” Analyst
141
(12
), 3496
–3510
(2016
). 10.
I.
Vlassiouk
, S.
Smirnov
, and Z.
Siwy
, “Ionic selectivity of single nanochannels
,” Nano Lett.
8
(7
), 1978
–1985
(2008
). 11.
K.
Sollner
, “Recent advances in the electrochemistry of membranes of high ionic selectivity
,” J. Electrochem. Soc.
97
(7
), C139
–C151
(1950
). 12.
Z.
Slouka
, S.
Senapati
, and H. C.
Chang
, “Microfluidic systems with ion-selective membranes
,” Annu. Rev. Anal. Chem.
7
(7
), 317
–335
(2014
). 13.
G.
Yossifon
et al, “Nonlinear current-voltage characteristics of nanochannels
,” Phys. Rev. E
79
(4
), 046305
(2009
). 14.
G.
Yossifon
, P.
Mushenheim
, and H. C.
Chang
, “Controlling nanoslot overlimiting current with the depth of a connecting microchamber
,” Europhys. Lett.
90
(6
), 64004
(2010
). 15.
L.
Vobecká
, T.
Belloň
, and Z.
Slouka
, “Behavior of embedded cation-exchange particles in a DC electric field
,” Int. J. Mol. Sci.
20
(14
), 3579
(2019
). 16.
T.
Belloň
, P. P.
Lucie Vobecká
, M.
Svoboda
, and Z.
Slouka
, “Experimental observation of phenomena developing on ion-exchange systems during current-voltage curve measurement
,” J. Membr. Sci.
572
, 607
–618
(2019
). 17.
M.
Svoboda
et al, “Cation exchange membrane integrated into a microfluidic device
,” Microelectron. Eng.
86
(4–6
), 1371
–1374
(2009
). 18.
T. W.
Xu
, “Ion exchange membranes: State of their development and perspective
,” J. Membr. Sci.
263
(1-2
), 1
–29
(2005
). 19.
A.
Dabrowski
et al, “Selective removal of the heavy metal ions from waters and industrial wastewaters by ion-exchange method
,” Chemosphere
56
(2
), 91
–106
(2004
). 20.
H. C.
Chang
, G.
Yossifon
, and E. A.
Demekhin
, “Nanoscale electrokinetics and microvortices: How microhydrodynamics affects nanofluidic ion flux
,” Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech.
44
(44
), 401
–426
(2012
). 21.
H. C.
Chang
and G.
Yossifon
, “Understanding electrokinetics at the nanoscale: A perspective
,” Biomicrofluidics
3
(1
), 012001
(2009
). 22.
S. J.
Kim
et al, “Concentration polarization and nonlinear electrokinetic flow near a nanofluidic channel
,” Phys. Rev. Lett.
99
(4
), 044501
(2007
). 23.
J. C.
de Valenca
et al, “Dynamics of microvortices induced by ion concentration polarization
,” Phys. Rev. E
92
(3
), 031003(R)
(2015
). 24.
H. C.
Chang
and L. Y.
Yeo
, Electrokinetically Driven Microfluidics and Nanofluidics
(Cambridge University Press
, Cambridge
, 2010
), 508 pp.25.
R.
Ibanez
, D. F.
Stamatialis
, and M.
Wessling
, “Role of membrane surface in concentration polarization at cation exchange membranes
,” J. Membr. Sci.
239
(1
), 119
–128
(2004
). 26.
I.
Rubinstein
, B.
Zaltzman
, and I.
Lerman
, “Electroconvective instability in concentration polarization and nonequilibrium electro-osmotic slip
,” Phys. Rev. E
72
(1)
, 011505
(2005
). 27.
F. C.
Leinweber
and U.
Tallarek
, “Concentration polarization-based nonlinear electrokinetics in porous media: Induced-charge electroosmosis
,” J. Phys. Chem. B
109
(46
), 21481
–21485
(2005
). 28.
V. V.
Nikonenko
et al, “Desalination at overlimiting currents: State-of-the-art and perspectives
,” Desalination
342
, 85
–106
(2014
). 29.
Z.
Slouka
et al, “Charge inversion, water splitting, and vortex suppression due to DNA sorption on ion-selective membranes and their ion-current signatures
,” Langmuir
29
(26
), 8275
–8283
(2013
). 30.
D. T.
Conroy
et al, “Nonequilibrium hysteresis and Wien effect water dissociation at a bipolar membrane
,” Phys. Rev. E
86
(5
), 056104
(2012
). 31.
R.
Simons
, “Water splitting in ion-exchange membranes
,” Electrochim. Acta
30
(3
), 275
–282
(1985
). 32.
E.
Belova
et al, “Role of water splitting in development in ion-exchange membrane of electroconvection systems
,” Desalination
199
(1–3
), 59
–61
(2006
). 33.
J.
Choi
et al, “Selective preconcentration and online collection of charged molecules using ion concentration polarization
,” RSC Adv.
5
(81
), 66178
–66184
(2015
). 34.
S. H.
Ko
et al, “Nanofluidic preconcentration device in a straight microchannel using ion concentration polarization
,” Lab Chip
12
(21
), 4472
–4482
(2012
). 35.
S.
Marczak
et al, “Induced nanoparticle aggregation for short nucleic acid quantification by depletion isotachophoresis
,” Biosens. Bioelectron.
86
, 840
–848
(2016
). 36.
S.
Marczak
et al, “Simultaneous isolation and preconcentration of exosomes by ion concentration polarization
,” Electrophoresis
39
(15
), 2029
–2038
(2018
). 37.
H.
Jeon
et al, “Ion concentration polarization-based continuous separation device using electrical repulsion in the depletion region
,” Sci. Rep.
3
, 3483
(2013
).38.
G.
Sun
, S.
Senapati
, and H. C.
Chang
, “High-flux ionic diodes, ionic transistors and ionic amplifiers based on external ion concentration polarization by an ion exchange membrane: A new scalable ionic circuit platform
,” Lab Chip
16
(7
), 1171
–1177
(2016
). 39.
G.
Sun
, Z.
Slouka
, and H. C.
Chang
, “Fluidic-based ion memristors and ionic latches
,” Small
11
(39
), 5206
–5213
(2015
). 40.
S.
Park
et al, “Capillarity ion concentration polarization as spontaneous desalting mechanism
,” Nat. Commun.
7
, 11223
(2016
). 41.
B.
Kim
et al, “Purification of high salinity brine by multi-stage ion concentration polarization desalination
,” Sci. Rep.
6
, 31850
(2016
).42.
B. D.
MacDonald
et al, “Out-of-plane ion concentration polarization for scalable water desalination
,” Lab Chip
14
(4
), 681
–685
(2014
). 43.
J.
Astorga-Wells
, T.
Bergman
, and H.
Jornvall
, “Multistep microreactions with proteins using electrocapture technology
,” Anal. Chem.
76
(9
), 2425
–2429
(2004
). 44.
M.
Yamada
et al, “Rapid quantification of disease-marker proteins using continuous-flow immunoseparation in a nanosieve fluidic device
,” Anal. Chem.
81
(16
), 7067
–7074
(2009
). 45.
S. J.
Kim
, L. D.
Li
, and J.
Han
, “Amplified electrokinetic response by concentration polarization near nanofluidic channel
,” Langmuir
25
(13
), 7759
–7765
(2009
). 46.
R.
Kwak
et al, “Microscale electrodialysis: Concentration profiling and vortex visualization
,” Desalination
308
, 138
–146
(2013
). 47.
R.
Kwak
et al, “Enhanced salt removal by unipolar ion conduction in ion concentration polarization desalination
,” Sci. Rep.
6
, 25349
(2016
).48.
B.
Kim
et al, “Partial desalination of hypersaline brine by lab-scale ion concentration polarization device
,” Desalination
412
, 20
–31
(2017
). 49.
M.
Svoboda
et al, “Fabrication of plastic microchips with gold microelectrodes using techniques of sacrificed substrate and thermally activated solvent bonding
,” Microelectron. Eng.
87
(5–8
), 1590
–1593
(2010
). 50.
J.
Astorga-Wells
and H.
Swerdlow
, “Fluidic preconcentrator device for capillary electrophoresis of proteins
,” Anal. Chem.
75
(19
), 5207
–5212
(2003
). © 2019 Author(s).
2019
Author(s)
You do not currently have access to this content.