The use of bioprinting as a powerful tool for tissue and organ fabrication has been a promising development in the field of biomedicine, offering unprecedented versatility in the fabrication of biologically and physiologically relevant constructs. Even though there are a plethora of commercial bioprinters available in the market, most of them are overly expensive. Thus, university facilities and independent research groups often find it difficult, if not impossible, to equip themselves with such machinery. In this Review, we analyze affordable alternatives to commercial bioprinters, which are presented by the Do-it-Yourself (DiY) community. First, we discuss the current state of these low-cost technologies, and the advances made to bridge the divergence between marketed bioprinters and DiY devices. Afterwards, the different bioprinting technologies that are most commonplace for these low-cost devices are examined. Additionally, an overview of the pioneering DiY bioprinters takes place, as well as the open-source software alternatives to control these bioprinters. Next, we analyze the different factors to take into consideration during the bioprinting workflow, such as bioinks, computer-aided models, and bioprinting parameters. Finally, we conclude with a brief assessment of current limitations and potential solutions, as well as future developments in the arena of bioprinting.
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
September 2021
Review Article|
September 01 2021
State-of-art affordable bioprinters: A guide for the DiY community
Carlos Ezio Garciamendez-Mijares
;
Carlos Ezio Garciamendez-Mijares
1
Division of Engineering in Medicine, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School
, Cambridge 02139, Massachusetts, USA
2
Departamento de Ingeniería Mecatrónica y Eléctrica, Escuela de Ingeniería y Ciencias, Tecnológico de Monterrey
, Monterrey 64849, Nuevo León, Mexico
3
Centro de Biotecnología-FEMSA, Tecnológico de Monterrey
, Monterrey 64849, Nuevo León, Mexico
Search for other works by this author on:
Prajwal Agrawal
;
Prajwal Agrawal
1
Division of Engineering in Medicine, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School
, Cambridge 02139, Massachusetts, USA
4
Department of Manufacturing, School of Mechanical Engineering, Vellore Institute of Technology
, Vellore, 632014, Tamil Nadu, India
Search for other works by this author on:
Germán García Martínez
;
Germán García Martínez
1
Division of Engineering in Medicine, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School
, Cambridge 02139, Massachusetts, USA
2
Departamento de Ingeniería Mecatrónica y Eléctrica, Escuela de Ingeniería y Ciencias, Tecnológico de Monterrey
, Monterrey 64849, Nuevo León, Mexico
3
Centro de Biotecnología-FEMSA, Tecnológico de Monterrey
, Monterrey 64849, Nuevo León, Mexico
Search for other works by this author on:
Ernesto Cervantes Juarez
;
Ernesto Cervantes Juarez
1
Division of Engineering in Medicine, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School
, Cambridge 02139, Massachusetts, USA
5
Departamento de Ingeniería en Sistemas Digitales y Robótica, Escuela de Ingeniería y Ciencias, Tecnológico de Monterrey
, Monterrey 64849, Nuevo León, Mexico
Search for other works by this author on:
Yu Shrike Zhang
Yu Shrike Zhang
a)
1
Division of Engineering in Medicine, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School
, Cambridge 02139, Massachusetts, USA
a)Author to whom correspondence should be addressed: [email protected]
Search for other works by this author on:
a)Author to whom correspondence should be addressed: [email protected]
Appl. Phys. Rev. 8, 031312 (2021)
Article history
Received:
February 16 2021
Accepted:
July 26 2021
Connected Content
A companion article has been published:
Bioprinters too expensive? Try making your own
Citation
Carlos Ezio Garciamendez-Mijares, Prajwal Agrawal, Germán García Martínez, Ernesto Cervantes Juarez, Yu Shrike Zhang; State-of-art affordable bioprinters: A guide for the DiY community. Appl. Phys. Rev. 1 September 2021; 8 (3): 031312. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0047818
Download citation file:
Pay-Per-View Access
$40.00
Sign In
You could not be signed in. Please check your credentials and make sure you have an active account and try again.
Citing articles via
(Ultra)wide bandgap semiconductor heterostructures for electronics cooling
Zhe Cheng, Zifeng Huang, et al.
Continuous-variable quantum key distribution system: Past, present, and future
Yichen Zhang, Yiming Bian, et al.
Roadmap for focused ion beam technologies
Katja Höflich, Gerhard Hobler, et al.
Related Content
Extrusion bioprinting of soft materials: An emerging technique for biological model fabrication
Appl. Phys. Rev. (March 2019)
Design considerations for digital light processing bioprinters
Appl. Phys. Rev. (July 2024)
Physics of bioprinting
Appl. Phys. Rev. (June 2019)
Complex 3D bioprinting methods
APL Bioeng. (March 2021)
Biomechanical factors in three-dimensional tissue bioprinting
Appl. Phys. Rev. (December 2020)