Dissipative Kerr soliton (DKS) microcombs based on multi-mode Si3N4 waveguides turn into an ideal tool that is compact and has precision for optical communication, precision spectroscopy, and frequency metrology. However, spatial waveguide mode interaction leads to local disturbances of dispersion, which may hinder DKS microcombs formation. In this letter, we generate the DKS microcomb in a dual-mode interaction Si3N4 microresonator without suppressing spatial waveguide mode interaction. The spatial waveguide mode interaction is investigated in the dual-mode interaction Si3N4 microresonator with a cross-sectional area of 800 × 1700 nm2. DKS microcomb is deterministically generated in the microresonator using an auxiliary light heating method. Furthermore, an integrated microcomb frequency measurement system is designed based on the DKS microcomb for frequency metrology.

Dissipative Kerr soliton (DKS) microcombs are generated using a continuous wave pump laser with a high-quality factor (Q-factor) resonator.1 The generation of DKS microcombs relies on nonlinear optical effects within a resonator platform, producing a broad spectrum of evenly spaced frequency lines. In recent years, DKS microcombs have been realized on various platforms with significant Kerr nonlinearity.1–5 Among these platforms, the amorphous Si3N4 platform, with high effective nonlinearity, low optical losses, a broad transparency window, a wide bandgap of 5 eV, and fabrication compatibility, makes Si3N4 waveguides an attractive material used in integrated DKS microcomb.6,7 Photonic chip-based DKS microcombs are widely used in ranging,8–10 spectroscopy,11,12 communication,13,14 and microwave photonic.4 

The larger cross-sectional area of multi-mode Si3N4 waveguides can result in reduced bending losses, which is beneficial for photonic integrated microresonators.15,16 Photonic integrated microresonators with low loss rate are widely used in DKS generation. DKS are manifested as bright solitons or dark pulses, depending on the group velocity dispersion (GVD) of the microresonator.17 Therefore, comb structures in the frequency domain can be optimized through careful geometric dispersion engineering. Multi-mode waveguides offer additional flexibility in managing and engineering dispersion.18 However, in multi-mode waveguides, different spatial modes and their interactions affect local dispersion and introduce additional parasitic losses.19,20 When two mode resonant frequencies approach each other, coupling between them leads to mode hybridization, shifting resonance frequencies. This phenomenon, known as “avoided modal crossing” (AMX), can disrupt group velocity dispersion by altering the dispersion properties of the involved modes.19,21 AMX plays a crucial role in the microcomb field, facilitating the stabilization of bright solitons or the generation of dark pulses.17,22 Auxiliary cavity geometries are also used to achieve precise control over the AMX positions for microcomb generation.23,24 However, spatial mode coupling in multi-mode waveguides is often uncontrollable. Accidental AMXs often prevent the soliton formation.25 Several methods have been proposed to suppress AMX in a multi-mode waveguides. A single-mode filtering section has been introduced to suppress higher-order mode families.19 Recently, racetrack-shaped microresonators with adiabatic bends connecting straight waveguides to suppress spatial mode interactions have been demonstrated.15,26,27 To the best of our knowledge, there exists great research space in the generation of DKS microcomb in multi-mode Si3N4 waveguide microresonators without suppressing AMX, which motivates us carry out this work.

In this letter, DKS microcomb is generated in a multi-mode Si3N4 waveguide microresonator without suppressing spatial waveguide mode interaction. The multi-mode Si3N4 waveguide microresonator features high quality factor Q > 2.246 × 106, free spectral range (FSR) about 47 GHz, and a large amount of AMXs. The spatial waveguide mode interaction is investigated in multi-mode Si3N4 waveguide microresonators. The result indicates that interaction between fundamental TE00(TM00) mode and higher-order TE10(TM10) mode will generates periodic AMXs, which can severely limit the device’s performance. The DKS microcomb generated in the dual-mode interaction microresonator is demonstrated using the auxiliary laser heating method.28,29 In addition, performance of the DKS microcomb is illustrated by designing an integrated microcomb frequency measurement (MIFM) system to measure the frequency of frequency-modulated lasers. Compared to the standard H13C14N gas cell absorption wavelengths, the measurement error by the MIFM system does not exceed 11 pm.

The Si3N4 microring resonator (microresonator) used in this letter is fabricated by using the LIGENTEC AN800 process. Figure 1(a) shows the conceptual design of the microresonator Si3N4 waveguide with a thickness of 800 and 1700 nm width fully coated with SiO2. If thickness of the straight waveguide is 800 nm and the width exceeds 800 nm, then higher-order modes occur.19 To verify higher-order modes existing in the used microresonator, a numerical simulation is developed in this letter. The numerically simulation results of mode profiles for four mode families are shown in Fig. 1(a). As shown in Fig. 1(a), the higher-order TE10 and TM10 modes are observed. With the same waveguide cross-sectional, a Si3N4 microresonator with a radius of 238.2 μm has been demonstrated to successfully generate soliton microcombs with a repetition frequency of 94.3 GHz.30 In this letter, we utilized a Si3N4 microresonator with a radius of 455.6 μm for 47 GHz free-spectral-range (FSR) at the wavelength of 1550 nm.

FIG. 1.

AMX characterization of dual-mode interaction Si3N4 microresonators. (a) Schematic of the Si3N4 microresonator and the mode profiles, including the magnetic field vectors, taken for a ring radius of 455.6 μm; the cross-sectional area of the waveguide is 1700 × 800 nm2 at a wavelength of 1550 nm. (b) Simulation of group index ng,00 and ng,10 for TE00 and TE10 modes of the dual-mode interaction microresonator. The insets show the vertical axis zoom in view. (c) Interference period ∂λ according to the group index difference between tow mode families TE00 and TE10. (d) Numerical simulation of TE00 and TE10 modes resonate frequency with different ring radius, the number of mode interactions between two modes’ families increased in the wavelength range 1500–1600 nm, where the radius of the ring resonator becomes larger.

FIG. 1.

AMX characterization of dual-mode interaction Si3N4 microresonators. (a) Schematic of the Si3N4 microresonator and the mode profiles, including the magnetic field vectors, taken for a ring radius of 455.6 μm; the cross-sectional area of the waveguide is 1700 × 800 nm2 at a wavelength of 1550 nm. (b) Simulation of group index ng,00 and ng,10 for TE00 and TE10 modes of the dual-mode interaction microresonator. The insets show the vertical axis zoom in view. (c) Interference period ∂λ according to the group index difference between tow mode families TE00 and TE10. (d) Numerical simulation of TE00 and TE10 modes resonate frequency with different ring radius, the number of mode interactions between two modes’ families increased in the wavelength range 1500–1600 nm, where the radius of the ring resonator becomes larger.

Close modal
In a dual-mode interaction Si3N4 microresonator, the transmission spectrum has a periodic wavelength-dependent intensity modulation (supplementary material Fig. S1). The periodic modulation is mainly caused by the interference between TE00 mode and higher-order TE10 mode. The wavelength-dependent periodic modulation is related to the propagation constant difference between TE00 mode and higher-order TE10 mode. The destructive interference condition between TE00 mode and TE10 mode can be expressed as
(1)
where k is an integer, ϕ00 and ϕ10 are the phase-shift of the TE00 mode and TE10 mode, respectively, within the microring of circumference L, which can be calculated from the propagation constants as ϕ00=0Lβ00dx and ϕ10=0Lβ10dx. The propagation constant is related to the effective group index ng via β(λ) = 2πng/λ. As a result, the wavelength-dependent destructive interference period is expressed as15 
(2)

Figure 1(b) shows the simulation results of the effective group index for the TE00 mode and the TE10 mode under the Si3N4 MMR with a radius of 455.6 μm. The wavelength-dependent destructive interference period δλ is shown in Fig. 1(c). From the simulation results, the destructive interference wavelength period for the TE00–TE10 modes is about 8.56 nm at 1550 nm. In addition, the period decreases as optical wavelength increase.

To further elucidate mode interaction between the TE00 mode and the TE10 mode, simulations are conducted on resonant frequencies of the two modes under Si3N4 MMR with different radius, respectively. Figure 1(d) shows the simulation results of the resonant frequencies over the wavelength range of 1500–1600 nm within different radius. The resonant frequency is conducted by m = cneff/ω. As shown in Fig. 1(d), the resonant frequencies of these two modes have a small difference in their FSRs; the resonant frequency of these two modes will periodically approach each other in the frequency domain. The coupling between these two mode families can additionally lead to AMX, when the resonant frequencies approach each other. It is observed that the number of AMX increases with larger resonator radius under a certain wavelength range. These AMXs can not only locally alter the dispersion but also potentially prohibit DKS microcomb generation, even in the presence of the overall anomalous dispersion.25 

The dual-mode interaction Si3N4 microresonator used in this letter has a waveguide cross section of 1700 × 800 nm2 (height × width) and a radius of 455.6 μm. From the simulation results, it can be concluded that within the 1500–1600 nm wavelength range, there are 12 AMXs.

In this section, we implemented DKS microcomb experiments based on the aforementioned Si3N4 microresonator. The Si3N4 microresonator is characterized. To future discuss the performance and advantages of the generated DKS microcomb, frequency measurement experiments are presented.

Figure 2 shows the characterization of microresonator parameters in the 1500–1600 nm range. The integrated dispersion is defined as Dint = ωμω0D1μ, where μ is the relative mode number of the center mode, ωμ/2π is the μth resonance frequency, and D1/2π is the FSR of the center mode. As shown in Fig. 2(a), the Si3N4 microresonator exhibits overall anomalous group velocity dispersion (GVD). Figure 2(b) shows local deviations in the integrated dispersion of TE00 mode, caused by the influence of AMXs. Two mode families are identified from the transmission spectrum near one AMX. As shown in Fig. 2(c), the higher-order TE10 mode (red dots) exhibits Fano resonance.31 When the TE00 mode (black dots), with a narrow resonance linewidth, approaches a TE10 mode, AMX occurs, resulting in a shift in the resonance frequency of the TE00 mode. The interaction between these two modes leads to a partial broadening of the resonance linewidth of the TE00 mode.

FIG. 2.

Characterization of the microresonator in the 1500–1600 nm range. (a) Integrate dispersion of the fundamental TE00 mode fitted with Dint=D22/2. Gray bar: mode crossing of the fundamental mode between other modes. (b) Dispersion frequency deviation of the fundamental TE00 mode, i.e., the difference between the measured dispersion values and the fitted values. (c) Microresonator transmission spectrum near one AMX. (d) Distribution of the measured resonance linewidths.

FIG. 2.

Characterization of the microresonator in the 1500–1600 nm range. (a) Integrate dispersion of the fundamental TE00 mode fitted with Dint=D22/2. Gray bar: mode crossing of the fundamental mode between other modes. (b) Dispersion frequency deviation of the fundamental TE00 mode, i.e., the difference between the measured dispersion values and the fitted values. (c) Microresonator transmission spectrum near one AMX. (d) Distribution of the measured resonance linewidths.

Close modal

Figure 3(a) shows the experimental setup for DKS microcomb generation. Auxiliary heating is used to balance thermal effects. When generating DKS microcombs, it is necessary to note that the dispersion local disturbances and the reduction in the Q factor of some resonant modes are caused by AMX (supplementary material Sec. II). The resonance at 1550.19 nm located near the midpoint between two AMXs is selected as the pump mode, which can obtain a larger range of anomalous dispersion. The resonance mode at 1560.08 nm with a relatively lower Q factor is selected as the auxiliary mode, which enables a wider tuning range of the auxiliary laser and helps prevent the generation of undesired spectral sidebands.32 From the transmission spectrum, it is observed that after tuning the auxiliary laser to the appropriate position, clear soliton steps appears when the pump laser is scanned from blue detuning to red detuning.

FIG. 3.

(a) Schematic of the experimental setup for DKS microcomb generation. Two continuous wave (CW) lasers are amplified by two erbium-doped fiber amplifiers (EDFAs), and their polarization state is controlled by two fiber polarization controllers (FPCs); after passing through two circulators (CIRs), they are coupled into the waveguide via a fiber array. One serves as the primary pump to generate the DKS microcomb, while the other serves as the auxiliary heating laser. Transmission power traces of the pump laser and auxiliary recorded by the oscilloscope (OSC). The inset shows the transmission power traces. (b) Measured spectrum of a single-soliton microcomb.

FIG. 3.

(a) Schematic of the experimental setup for DKS microcomb generation. Two continuous wave (CW) lasers are amplified by two erbium-doped fiber amplifiers (EDFAs), and their polarization state is controlled by two fiber polarization controllers (FPCs); after passing through two circulators (CIRs), they are coupled into the waveguide via a fiber array. One serves as the primary pump to generate the DKS microcomb, while the other serves as the auxiliary heating laser. Transmission power traces of the pump laser and auxiliary recorded by the oscilloscope (OSC). The inset shows the transmission power traces. (b) Measured spectrum of a single-soliton microcomb.

Close modal

Figure 3(b) shows that the measured optical spectrum of the DKS microcomb general features a characteristic sech2 shape. However, near the wavelength where AMX occurs, the spectral envelopes feature modulations such as the transmission spectrum. This effect is due to the increased parasitic coupling loss near the AMX points (supplementary material Sec. III).

Finally, the microcomb-based integrated frequency measurement (MIFM) system scheme is presented. This scheme utilizes the DKS microcomb as a frequency reference to measure the frequency of frequency-modulated (FM) lasers. Figure 4(a) shows microscopic images of the microresonator and MIFM devices. These two devices are fabricated using silicon photonic complementary metal-oxide-semiconductor (CMOS) technology, with the waveguide layer made of Si3N4. Both devices can be integrated onto the same photonic integrated circuit (PIC). The MIFM system device consists of a Mach–Zehnder interferometer (MZI) optical path and a multi-mode interference coupler (MMI). Figure 4(b) shows the experiment setup, where the FM laser and DKS microcomb are each coupled into the MIFM chip. After passing through an unbalanced Mach–Zehnder interferometer (MZI), the FM laser generates a beat signal. The phase of the beat signal is proportional to the frequency of the FM laser, which can be expressed as
(3)
where fFM(t) is the optical frequency of the FM laser. Due to the presence of FM nonlinearity, the corresponding frequency cannot be directly calculated from the phase of the beat signal. The DKS microcomb has equally spaced frequency teeth, each of which interferes with the nearby frequency-modulated laser to produce a chirped signal. Therefore, within the same time series, the positions of the chirped signals from the comb teeth are extracted and matched with their corresponding positions in the MZI beat phase signal. By fitting the tooth frequencies and the MZI beat phase with a linear function, the corresponding relationship between frequency and beat phase can be determined. In addition, signals from the FM laser, after passing through an H13C14N gas cell, were also collected to verify the accuracy of the frequency measurement. The H13C14N molecular absorption lines have been identified by national standards bodies as a primary wavelength reference in the C band (1530–1565 nm).
FIG. 4.

Frequency metrology experiment. (a) Microscope images of the microresonator and MIFM system devices. (b) Experiment setup of the FM frequency measurement. (c) Fitting line between comb tooth frequencies and beat phase. In addition, the gray circles represent the phases corresponding to the extracted positions of the gas cell absorption lines. (d) The residuals between the actual absorption wavelengths and the fitted calculated absorption wavelengths.

FIG. 4.

Frequency metrology experiment. (a) Microscope images of the microresonator and MIFM system devices. (b) Experiment setup of the FM frequency measurement. (c) Fitting line between comb tooth frequencies and beat phase. In addition, the gray circles represent the phases corresponding to the extracted positions of the gas cell absorption lines. (d) The residuals between the actual absorption wavelengths and the fitted calculated absorption wavelengths.

Close modal

In the experiment, the FM laser was scanned from 1539–1561 nm at the rate of 20 nm/s covering 27 H13C14N absorption lines. The center wavelength of the DKS microcomb is 1550.12 nm, and the repetition frequency is 47.12 GHz. The fitting results between the frequency and phase are compared to the frequencies of the H13C14N absorption lines. By extracting the phase of the MZI signal corresponding to each absorption line position, the frequency is calculated. Figure 4(c) shows the comparison between the calculated frequency after fitting and the standard frequency. The comparison results indicate that the wavelength residual does not exceed 11 pm. These results highlight the feasibility of the MIFM system for application in FM laser frequency measurement.

In summary, we have generated DKS microcomb in a dual-mode interaction Si3N4 microresonator without suppressing AMXs, and an MIFM system has been designed for FM laser frequency measurement. Through numerical simulation and theoretical analysis, we have demonstrated the periodic AMXs in a dual-mode interaction Si3N4 microresonator caused by the group index difference between TE00 mode and TE10 mode. The presence of AMXs can significantly distort local dispersion, posing a challenge to soliton formation. By using an auxiliary heating method, the DKS microcomb has been successfully generated in the dual-mode interaction Si3N4 microresonator. Our results demonstrate the effective application of the DKS microcomb as a frequency ruler in frequency-modulated (FM) laser frequency measurements, proving its compatibility with established frequency metrology standards. This approach not only mitigates the dispersion-related challenges caused by AMXs but also enhances the precision and reliability of on-chip frequency measurements.

The successful generation of the integrated on-chip DKS microcomb represents a significant advancement in the field, providing a robust and scalable solution for future frequency metrology systems. The ability to integrate such high-performance microcombs on a silicon photonic platform opens new avenues for compact, cost-effective, and versatile frequency measurement tools. As the technology continues to evolve, we anticipate its widespread adoption in various applications, including telecommunications, spectroscopy, and precision metrology, further driving innovation in integrated photonics.

See the supplementary material for additional information.

This work was supported by the National Key Research and Development Program of China (Grant No. 2022YFF0705701) and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 52375546).

The authors have no conflicts to disclose.

Yurun Zhai: Formal analysis (equal); Writing – original draft (equal). Junchen Liu: Writing – review & editing (equal). Linhua Jia: Writing – review & editing (equal). Fumin Zhang: Funding acquisition (equal); Writing – review & editing (equal).

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

1.
T.
Herr
,
V.
Brasch
,
J. D.
Jost
,
C. Y.
Wang
,
N. M.
Kondratiev
,
M. L.
Gorodetsky
, and
T. J.
Kippenberg
, “
Temporal solitons in optical microresonators
,”
Nat. Photonics
8
,
145
152
(
2014
).
2.
H.
Weng
,
A. A.
Afridi
,
J.
Li
,
M.
McDermott
,
H.
Tu
,
L. P.
Barry
,
Q.
Lu
,
W.
Guo
, and
J. F.
Donegan
, “
Dual-mode microresonators as straightforward access to octave-spanning dissipative K solitons
,”
APL Photonics
7
,
066103
(
2022
).
3.
W.
Weng
,
E.
Lucas
,
G.
Lihachev
,
V. E.
Lobanov
,
H.
Guo
,
M. L.
Gorodetsky
, and
T. J.
Kippenberg
, “
Spectral purification of microwave signals with disciplined dissipative Kerr solitons
,”
Phys. Rev. Lett.
122
,
013902
(
2019
).
4.
L.
Yao
,
P.
Liu
,
H.-J.
Chen
,
Q.
Gong
,
Q.-F.
Yang
, and
Y.-F.
Xiao
, “
Soliton microwave oscillators using oversized billion Q optical microresonators
,”
Optica
9
,
561
564
(
2022
).
5.
C.
Wang
,
J.
Li
,
A.
Yi
,
Z.
Fang
,
L.
Zhou
,
Z.
Wang
,
R.
Niu
,
Y.
Chen
,
J.
Zhang
,
Y.
Cheng
,
J.
Liu
,
C.-H.
Dong
, and
X.
Ou
, “
Soliton formation and spectral translation into visible on CMOS-compatible 4H-silicon-carbide-on-insulator platform
,”
Light: Sci. Appl.
11
,
341
(
2022
).
6.
J.
Liu
,
G.
Huang
,
R. N.
Wang
,
J.
He
,
A. S.
Raja
,
T.
Liu
,
N. J.
Engelsen
, and
T. J.
Kippenberg
, “
High-yield, wafer-scale fabrication of ultralow-loss, dispersion-engineered silicon nitride photonic circuits
,”
Nat. Commun.
12
,
2236
(
2021
).
7.
Y.
Yang
,
J.-W.
Henke
,
A. S.
Raja
,
F. J.
Kappert
,
G.
Huang
,
G.
Arend
,
Z.
Qiu
,
A.
Feist
,
R. N.
Wang
,
A.
Tusnin
,
A.
Tikan
,
C.
Ropers
,
T. J.
Kippenberg
,
C.
Ropers
, and
T. J.
Kippenberg
, “
Free-electron interaction with nonlinear optical states in microresonators
,”
Science
383
,
168
173
(
2024
).
8.
P.
Trocha
,
M.
Karpov
,
D.
Ganin
,
M. H. P.
Pfeiffer
,
A.
Kordts
,
S.
Wolf
,
J.
Krockenberger
,
P.
Marin-Palomo
,
C.
Weimann
,
S.
Randel
,
W.
Freude
,
T. J.
Kippenberg
, and
C.
Koos
, “
Ultrafast optical ranging using microresonator soliton frequency combs
,”
Science
359
,
887
891
(
2018
).
9.
L.
Jia
,
Y.
Wang
,
X.
Wang
,
F.
Zhang
,
W.
Wang
,
J.
Wang
,
J.
Zheng
,
J.
Chen
,
M.
Song
,
X.
Ma
,
M.
Yuan
,
B.
Little
,
S. T.
Chu
,
D.
Cheng
,
X.
Qu
,
W.
Zhao
, and
W.
Zhang
, “
Nonlinear calibration of frequency modulated continuous wave lidar based on a microresonator soliton comb
,”
Opt. Lett.
46
,
1025
1028
(
2021
).
10.
J.
Wang
,
Z.
Lu
,
W.
Wang
,
F.
Zhang
,
J.
Chen
,
Y.
Wang
,
J.
Zheng
,
S. T.
Chu
,
W.
Zhao
,
B. E.
Little
,
X.
Qu
, and
W.
Zhang
, “
Long-distance ranging with high precision using a soliton microcomb
,”
Photonics Res.
8
,
1964
1972
(
2020
).
11.
Y.
Wang
,
Z.
Wang
,
X.
Wang
,
W.
Shao
,
L.
Huang
,
B.
Liang
,
B. E.
Little
,
S. T.
Chu
,
W.
Zhao
,
W.
Wang
, and
W.
Zhang
, “
Scanning dual-microcomb spectroscopy
,”
Sci. China: Phys., Mech. Astron.
65
,
294211
(
2022
).
12.
Q.-F.
Yang
,
B.
Shen
,
H.
Wang
,
M.
Tran
,
Z.
Zhang
,
K. Y.
Yang
,
L.
Wu
,
C.
Bao
,
J.
Bowers
,
A.
Yariv
, and
K.
Vahala
, “
Vernier spectrometer using counterpropagating soliton microcombs
,”
Science
363
,
965
968
(
2019
).
13.
Y.
Liu
,
H.
Zhang
,
J.
Liu
,
L.
Lu
,
J.
Du
,
Y.
Li
et al, “
Parallel wavelength-division-multiplexed signal transmission and dispersion compensation enabled by soliton microcombs and microrings
,”
Nat. Commun.
15
,
3645
(
2024
).
14.
Y.
Geng
,
H.
Zhou
,
X.
Han
,
W.
Cui
,
Q.
Zhang
,
B.
Liu
,
G.
Deng
,
Q.
Zhou
, and
K.
Qiu
, “
Coherent optical communications using coherence-cloned Kerr soliton microcombs
,”
Nat. Commun.
13
,
1070
(
2022
).
15.
X.
Ji
,
J.
Liu
,
J.
He
,
R. N.
Wang
,
Z.
Qiu
,
J.
Riemensberger
, and
T. J.
Kippenberg
, “
Compact, spatial-mode-interaction-free, ultralow-loss, nonlinear photonic integrated circuits
,”
Commun. Phys.
5
,
84
(
2022
).
16.
Z.
Tao
,
B.
Shen
,
W.
Li
,
L.
Xing
,
H.
Wang
,
Y.
Wu
,
Y.
Tao
,
Y.
Zhou
,
Y.
He
,
C.
Peng
,
H.
Shu
, and
X.
Wang
, “
Versatile photonic molecule switch in multimode microresonators
,”
Light: Sci. Appl.
13
,
51
(
2024
).
17.
C.
Lao
,
X.
Jin
,
L.
Chang
,
H.
Wang
,
Z.
Lv
,
W.
Xie
,
H.
Shu
,
X.
Wang
,
J. E.
Bowers
, and
Q.-F.
Yang
, “
Quantum decoherence of dark pulses in optical microresonators
,”
Nat. Commun.
14
,
1802
(
2023
).
18.
A.
Frigg
,
A.
Boes
,
G.
Ren
,
T. G.
Nguyen
,
D.-Y.
Choi
,
S.
Gees
,
D.
Moss
, and
A.
Mitchell
, “
Optical frequency comb generation with low temperature reactive sputtered silicon nitride waveguides
,”
APL Photonics
5
,
011302
(
2020
).
19.
A.
Kordts
,
M. H. P.
Pfeiffer
,
H.
Guo
,
V.
Brasch
, and
T. J.
Kippenberg
, “
Higher order mode suppression in high-Q anomalous dispersion SiN microresonators for temporal dissipative Kerr soliton formation
,”
Opt. Lett.
41
,
452
455
(
2016
).
20.
M. H. P.
Pfeiffer
,
J.
Liu
,
M.
Geiselmann
, and
T. J.
Kippenberg
, “
Coupling ideality of integrated planar high-q microresonators
,”
Phys. Rev. Appl.
7
,
024026
(
2017
).
21.
T.
Carmon
,
H. G. L.
Schwefel
,
L.
Yang
,
M.
Oxborrow
,
A. D.
Stone
, and
K. J.
Vahala
, “
Static envelope patterns in composite resonances generated by level crossing in optical toroidal microcavities
,”
Phys. Rev. Lett.
100
,
103905
(
2008
).
22.
Y.
Liu
,
Y.
Xuan
,
X.
Xue
,
P.-H.
Wang
,
S.
Chen
,
A. J.
Metcalf
,
J.
Wang
,
D. E.
Leaird
,
M.
Qi
, and
A. M.
Weiner
, “
Investigation of mode coupling in normal-dispersion silicon nitride microresonators for Kerr frequency comb generation
,”
Optica
1
,
137
144
(
2014
).
23.
A. C.
Triscari
,
A.
Tusnin
,
A.
Tikan
, and
T. J.
Kippenberg
, “
Quiet point engineering for low-noise microwave generation with soliton microcombs
,”
Commun. Phys.
6
,
318
(
2023
).
24.
Q.-X.
Ji
,
P.
Liu
,
W.
Jin
,
J.
Guo
,
L.
Wu
,
Z.
Yuan
,
J.
Peters
,
A.
Feshali
,
M.
Paniccia
,
J. E.
Bowers
, and
K. J.
Vahala
, “
Multimodality integrated microresonators using the Moiré speedup effect
,”
Science
383
,
1080
1083
(
2024
).
25.
T.
Herr
,
V.
Brasch
,
J. D.
Jost
,
I.
Mirgorodskiy
,
G.
Lihachev
,
M. L.
Gorodetsky
, and
T. J.
Kippenberg
, “
Mode spectrum and temporal soliton formation in optical microresonators
,”
Phys. Rev. Lett.
113
,
123901
(
2014
).
26.
C.
Ye
,
C.
Kim
,
Y.
Zheng
,
Y.
Zhou
,
A. N.
Kamel
,
Y.
Zhao
,
K.
Yvind
, and
M.
Pu
, “
Robust multimode waveguide design for avoided mode crossing-suppressed microresonators
,”
J. Lightwave Technol.
41
,
4755
4761
(
2023
).
27.
Z.
Ye
,
F.
Lei
,
K.
Twayana
,
M.
Girardi
,
P. A.
Andrekson
, and
V.
Torres-Company
, “
Integrated, ultra-compact high-Q silicon nitride microresonators for low-repetition-rate soliton microcombs
,”
Laser Photonics Rev.
16
,
2100147
(
2022
).
28.
H.
Zhou
,
Y.
Geng
,
W.
Cui
,
S.-W.
Huang
,
Q.
Zhou
,
K.
Qiu
, and
C.
Wei Wong
, “
Soliton bursts and deterministic dissipative Kerr soliton generation in auxiliary-assisted microcavities
,”
Light: Sci. Appl.
8
,
50
(
2019
).
29.
X.
Wang
,
P.
Xie
,
W.
Wang
,
Y.
Wang
,
Z.
Lu
,
L.
Wang
,
S. T.
Chu
,
B. E.
Little
,
W.
Zhao
, and
W.
Zhang
, “
Program-controlled single soliton microcomb source
,”
Photonics Res.
9
,
66
72
(
2021
).
30.
J.
Zheng
,
L.
Ni
,
W.
Gu
,
L.
Jia
,
Y.
Zhai
,
Q.
Niu
,
F.
Zhang
, and
X.
Qu
, “
Reversible generation of dissipative Kerr solitons in a microresonator by the backward tuning method
,”
Chin. Opt. Lett.
22
,
071403
(
2024
).
31.
T.
Yuan
,
X.
Wang
,
J.
Wu
,
H.
Li
,
Y.
Chen
, and
X.
Chen
, “
Frequency-space selective Fano resonance based on a micro-ring resonator on lithium niobate on insulator
,”
Laser Photonics Rev.
2400457
(
published online, 2024
).
32.
Y.
Xiao
,
S.
Qian
,
Q.
Bai
,
H.
Wen
,
Y.
Geng
,
Y.
Wang
,
H.
Lai
,
B.
Yao
,
K.
Qiu
,
J.
Xu
, and
H.
Zhou
, “
Optimizing auxiliary laser heating for Kerr soliton microcomb generation
,”
Opt. Lett.
49
,
1129
1132
(
2024
).