Femtosecond (Fs) laser micro-/nano-fabrication technology allows direct definition of on-demand nanostructures with three-dimensional (3D) geometric features and tailored photonic functionalities in a facile manner. In addition, such a strategy is widely applicable to various material families, including dielectrics, semiconductors, and metals. Based on diverse dielectric crystals, fs-laser direct writing of optical waveguides with flexible geometries and functional waveguide-based photonic devices have been well-developed. Beyond waveguide architectures, the combination of 3D nanofabrication of fs lasers and the multi-functionalities of dielectric crystals has also lighted up the future development of novel photonic structures with features even beyond the optical diffraction limit. In this article, promising research topics on domain engineering for nonlinear optics, color centers and waveguides for integrated quantum photonics, and surface processing for integrated photonics enabled by fs laser micro-/nano-fabrication in dielectric crystals are briefly overviewed. We highlight recent progress on these research topics and stress the importance of optical aberration correction during laser fabrication, followed by a discussion of challenges and foreseeing the future development of fs laser defined nanostructures in dielectric crystals toward multi-functional photonics.

The last decade has witnessed the tremendous development of femtosecond (fs) laser precision engineering, which has revolutionized material processing/functionalization in a broad spectrum of areas associated with academic research and engineering.1–10 Nonthermal energy deposition (as a result of the ultrashort timescale of laser pulses and thus optical energy transfer) and three-dimensional (3D) nanofabrication (due to efficient confinement of nonlinear interactions within the focal volume) are the major keys to the great success of fs laser material processing, enabling high-precision, high-quality micro-/nano-fabrication applicable to a wide range of materials, including metals, semiconductors, and dielectrics.1 With a view to the multi-functionalization of photonic structures/devices/systems, dielectric crystals stand out because of their diverse crystalline structures and related optical properties, offering multi-functional material platforms promising for various classic and quantum photonic applications.

Fabrication of optical waveguides is usually the first thought when it comes to linking a micro-/nano-processing technology to designing functional photonic devices/systems. In the last decades, fs laser micro-/nano-fabrication has been well-developed for the direct writing of channelized waveguide architectures with flexible geometries.11–17 Pioneering research on fs-laser direct writing of waveguides in dielectric crystals is carried out first in lithium niobate (LiNbO3)18,19 and titanium-doped sapphire (Ti:Sapphire),20 which are important media for photonic applications in electro-optic modulation and lasers, respectively. Since then, fs laser micro-/nano-fabrication has immediately delivered stunning performance in defining 3D crystalline objects with a footprint compatible with lab-on-a-chip applications, opening up great opportunities and possibilities in integrated photonics based on dielectric crystals. Recent progress on fs-laser-defined crystalline waveguides and their photonic applications can be referenced elsewhere.11–14 

Beyond waveguides, diverse functional structures with 2D and 3D geometries based on dielectric crystals have been demonstrated by fs laser micro-/nano-fabrication.21–25 According to the used laser parameters on different lattice structures, the laser-induced localized features can either modify/enhance the original optical properties or introduce additional photonic functionalities within the target crystals at desired positions, largely enriching the potential application domains of crystalline nanostructures. This article aims to present a brief overview of the most recent research progress on fs laser micro-/nano-fabrication of functional photonic structures in terms of domain engineering for nonlinear optics (Sec. II), color centers and rare-earth-doped waveguides for integrated quantum photonics (Sec. III), and surface processing for integrated photonics (Sec. IV) in dielectric crystals. Before moving forward into the conclusion/outlook section, the impact of optical aberration during laser fabrication is discussed (Sec. V). In Sec. VI, we discuss the remaining challenges and potential opportunities on the above-mentioned topics and provide an outlook.

Precise engineering of ferroelectric domain structures in nonlinear optical crystals, such as LiNbO3, in a facile manner is highly desired for high-efficiency frequency conversion based on quasi-phase-matching (QPM).26–30 Conventional domain engineering techniques rely on electric-field poling (EFP), which applies a large external electric field (exceeding the coercive field Ec along the spontaneous polarization direction) via patterned electrodes. While EFP has been researched and well-developed for decades, its practicability in terms of defining advanced nanophotonic components/platforms with flexible geometries has, however, encountered bottlenecks since EFP domain structures are limited to 2D patterns with a resolution of only a micrometer.

In contrast to the electric field, the light field can be manipulated more accurately with a resolution up to the diffraction limit. This is the main reason why all-optical poling (AOP) using focused fs laser has become particularly interesting in recent years.23,24,31–34 Pioneering AOP studies use focused ultraviolet (UV) fs laser beam with a view to inducing a modulation of the Ec or a pyroelectric/thermoelectric field.31,35 However, due to the strong linear absorption of UV light by ferroelectrics, the inverted domain size is restricted to submicrons. In this regard, near-infrared (NIR) AOP is considered to be more promising since ferroelectrics are generally transparent in the NIR spectral region, and thus on-demand domain length can be flexibly defined.36–40 In this process, the focused NIR pulses cause local heating by multiple photon absorption, leading to local domain inversion by inducing an internal field that exceeds the reduced Ec at the laser focus [see Figs. 1(a) and 1(b)]. By further combining with proper thermal treatment, focused NIR fs laser pulses are able to define domain structures in LiNbO3 crystals with a high length/width aspect ratio of 800/1 µm.40 

FIG. 1.

(a) and (b) Mechanism of domain engineering with focused NIR fs laser pulses. The focused NIR fs laser pulses cause local heating by nonlinear optical absorption, leading to local domain inversion by inducing an internal field that exceeds the reduced Ec at the laser focus.33 (c) Čerenkov-type and (d) general SH confocal microscopic results of the periodic domain structures fabricated in LiNbO3.32 Reproduced with permission from Xu et al. Nat. Photonics 12, 591–595 (2018). Copyright 2018 Springer Nature Limited and Wei et al. Nat. Photonics 12, 596–600 (2018). Copyright 2018 Springer Nature Limited, respectively.

FIG. 1.

(a) and (b) Mechanism of domain engineering with focused NIR fs laser pulses. The focused NIR fs laser pulses cause local heating by nonlinear optical absorption, leading to local domain inversion by inducing an internal field that exceeds the reduced Ec at the laser focus.33 (c) Čerenkov-type and (d) general SH confocal microscopic results of the periodic domain structures fabricated in LiNbO3.32 Reproduced with permission from Xu et al. Nat. Photonics 12, 591–595 (2018). Copyright 2018 Springer Nature Limited and Wei et al. Nat. Photonics 12, 596–600 (2018). Copyright 2018 Springer Nature Limited, respectively.

Close modal

In terms of AOP-based 3D domain engineering, it has been a great challenge to directly pole the domains inside a dielectric crystal for decades. In 2018, two breakthrough studies first developed 3D domain/nonlinearity engineering in nonlinear optical crystals, namely LiNbO332 and barium calcium titanate (Ba0.77Ca0.23TiO3)33 (BCT, which has a much lower Ec than that of LiNbO3), using NIR fs laser pulses, opening up new possibilities and opportunities for fabrication of nonlinear photonic crystals (NPCs) with 3D configurations. In these two separate studies, the AOP parameters are optimized to either induce localized domain inversion via exceeding the Ec [i.e., χ(2)-inversion approach] of BCT or to selectively erase the nonlinearity [i.e., χ(2)-erasure approach] of LiNbO3, enabling NPCs with desired 3D χ(2) nonlinearity patterns for nonlinear frequency conversion; see the Čerenkov-type41,42 and general second harmonic (SH) confocal microscopic results in Figs. 1(c) and 1(d). It is worth noting that the laser-induced χ(2)-erasure and χ(2)-inversion approaches rely on different physical mechanisms, i.e., crystallinity reduction and light-induced electric field poling, respectively; their optimized experimental parameters and applicable material platforms are, therefore, quite different.23 Interestingly, by further systematically optimizing NIR laser parameters, both χ(2)-erasure and χ(2)-inversion effects can be realized in LiNbO3, depending on the laser-writing direction, as recently demonstrated [see Fig. 2(b)].24 Briefly, when the laser beam moves along the -z direction of LiNbO3, inverted domain structures can be defined. While the laser-writing direction is along +z, which is the original spontaneous polarization orientation of LiNbO3, no domain inversion can be identified. Without adjusting the laser writing parameters, furthermore, the already inverted domain structures can be effectively erased by the +z-direction laser writing. The origin of such a nonreciprocal feature is considered to be the different orientations of laser-induced localized thermoelectric-field components and thus different electric field-LiNbO3-domain interactions [see Fig. 2(a)], offering functional tools for the fabrication of arbitrary 3D domain structures with extremely fine features [see Fig. 2(c)]. For example, the linewidths of fabricated domain structures can be continuously varied by adjusting the laser-writing direction to a certain angle to the −z orientation, offering a reconfigurable way to fabricate 3D nanosized domain structures with a resolution [30 nm as experimentally demonstrated, see Fig. 2(c)] far beyond the optical diffraction limit.24 We believe this milestone study has inspired a new wave of research on high-quality 3D integrated nanophotonic devices for advanced nonlinear optical and optoelectronic applications.

FIG. 2.

(a) The simulated thermoelectric field, threshold field, and z component of the thermoelectric field for domain engineering in LiNbO3 enabled by using focused fs laser pulses.24 (b) The operation principle of non-reciprocal laser writing for LiNbO3 domain engineering.24 (c) Nanoscale control of domain engineering in the y-z plane of LiNbO3.24 Reproduced with permission from Xu et al. Nature 609, 496–501 (2022). Copyright (2022) Springer Nature Limited.

FIG. 2.

(a) The simulated thermoelectric field, threshold field, and z component of the thermoelectric field for domain engineering in LiNbO3 enabled by using focused fs laser pulses.24 (b) The operation principle of non-reciprocal laser writing for LiNbO3 domain engineering.24 (c) Nanoscale control of domain engineering in the y-z plane of LiNbO3.24 Reproduced with permission from Xu et al. Nature 609, 496–501 (2022). Copyright (2022) Springer Nature Limited.

Close modal

Integrated quantum photonics, through integrating different components with complementary functionalities on a single chip, offers a particularly desirable platform for generation, manipulation, and detection of quantum states of light, featuring functional scalability, stability, and integrability in contrast to traditional photonic quantum systems that involve “bulk optics” technology and, in the meantime, revolutionizing the field of quantum information in applications from communications to computing.43–47 In this new wave of quantum revolution, fs laser micro-/nano-fabrication plays an important role in terms of the definition of photonic structures with flexible geometries and diverse functionalities.46,48 A typical example of crystalline devices is non-degenerate photon pair generation using fs-laser-written waveguides in periodically poled LiNbO3 (PPLN), which, by the way, can be realized in the future by employing fs laser domain engineering as discussed in Sec. II, based on spontaneous parametric down conversion (SPDC).49 In waveguide structures, such a nonlinear optical effect can be well enhanced, and the generated photons can be flexibly routed in a facile manner, offering integrated solutions to single photon sources. Beyond this, here we focus our discussion on laser-induced color centers in diamonds and laser-written waveguides in rare-earth-doped crystals, which are promising integrated solutions for applications in single photon sources and quantum memories, respectively.

Single negatively charged nitrogen-vacancy (NV) centers, i.e., optically active point defects that form in diamonds by the binding of a lattice vacancy with a substitutional nitrogen impurity, have shown enormous potential in quantum applications, such as quantum information and sensing, due to their long spin coherence times (≈1 ms) even at room temperature.50–53 Fabrication of NV centers in diamonds is never an easy task because of the diamond’s extreme hardness and chemical resistance. Conventionally, this can be realized by pure physical micromachining techniques, such as energetic ion and electron beam irradiation methods, followed by post-thermal annealing treatment to stimulate diffusion of vacancies through the lattice, whereupon random vacancy-impurity binding and thus an NV center occur.54,55 However, ion/electron beam irradiation processes inevitably introduce residual subsurface lattice damage and degrade the color center quality.

The 3D precision micro/nano-machining nature of fs laser nanofabrication renders it an ideal solution to high-quality NV centers creation in a controlled way.22,46,56–62 In contrast to ion/electron beam irradiation, focused fs laser is able to fabricate localized lattice vacancies at any depth in the diamond without damaging the overlaying material. By further combining it with appropriate aberration correction, the placement of lattice vacancies, or NV centers, can be precisely controlled with a spatial resolution beyond the optical diffraction limit. Furthermore, desired NV center density, from single color centers to high-density ensembles, can also be well controlled by adjusting the laser parameters. Pioneering experimental demonstration of fs laser writing of NV centers is realized in diamond thin film with nitrogen concentration <5 ppb.58 In the laser fabrication process, a spatial light modulator is used for aberration correction, enabling a spatial resolution of 120/500 nm (in-plane/-depth resolution). In order to facilitate the random diffusion of vacancies and subsequent NV centers formation in the lattice, post-thermal annealing treatment is carried out, boosting the NV centers formation probability up to 45% ± 15%, which is consistent with the Poisson distribution optimum of 37%.58 A further step is taken in a subsequent study by using fs laser to introduce not only localized vacancy ensembles (using the “seed single pulse” with an energy of 27 nJ) but also localized thermal annealing (using the “annealing pulse train” with an energy of 19 nJ) for vacancy diffusion [see Fig. 3(a)], enabling near-deterministic (up to 96%) NV centers formation with a positioning accuracy of around 33/200 nm (in-plane/-depth accuracy).62 The near-unity yield therein is reached by using an in-line confocal microscope for online fluorescence measurement, which provides feedback to allow active control of the fabrication process [see Figs. 3(b) and 3(c)]. The strategy of fs-laser induced color centers can be straightforwardly extended to other material families, such as hexagonal boron nitride, silicon carbide, and gallium nitride, providing a promising tool for the optical fabrication of engineered materials and devices for quantum applications.

FIG. 3.

Laser-induced NV color centers in diamond. (a) A single “seed pulse” is used to generate vacancies, followed by a pulse train at lower energy to locally anneal the diamond for vacancy diffusion. (b) Fluorescence image of a single NV color centers array. (c) Measured NV color centers fluorescence spectrum and (d) photon statistics of the color center array.62 Reproduced with permission from Chen et al. Optica 6, 662–667 (2019). Copyright 2019 Optica Publishing Group.

FIG. 3.

Laser-induced NV color centers in diamond. (a) A single “seed pulse” is used to generate vacancies, followed by a pulse train at lower energy to locally anneal the diamond for vacancy diffusion. (b) Fluorescence image of a single NV color centers array. (c) Measured NV color centers fluorescence spectrum and (d) photon statistics of the color center array.62 Reproduced with permission from Chen et al. Optica 6, 662–667 (2019). Copyright 2019 Optica Publishing Group.

Close modal

Cryogenically cooled rare-earth-doped crystals feature exceptionally high coherence times offered by the dopant ions and a considerably large bandwidth due to the inhomogeneous broadening of the optical transitions of interest. They are, therefore, very promising as excellent solid-state platforms for the development of quantum storage devices compatible with integrated photonics.16,63–65 For example, rare-earth-doped yttrium silicate (RE:Y2SiO5) crystals have been demonstrated to offer coherence times exceeding six hours and are widely used for efficient quantum information storage.64,66

As one of the most promising platforms for integrated quantum memories, RE:Y2SiO5 waveguides fabricated by femtosecond laser direct writing (FsLDW) have been experimentally demonstrated to be an on-demand storage strategy since their pioneering work in 2016.46,67 Based on the enhanced light–matter interaction in FsLDW fabricated Pr3+:Y2SiO5 double-line waveguides therein and single-line waveguides in the subsequent studies,67–69 quantum memory performance [with a storage time of up to 15 µs67 and a storage efficiency as high as 21%,68 see Figs. 4(a) and 4(b)] surpassing all previously reported single-photon storage in waveguides has been demonstrated. Moreover, storage fidelity characterizations of FsLDW waveguides have been recently carried out in 151Eu3+:Y2SiO5 surface ridge waveguides and depressed cladding waveguides, demonstrating reliable coherent optical memories [featuring an ultrahigh qubit storage fidelity of >99%, see Fig. 4(c)] with an on-demand retrieval capability.70–74 Furthermore, at telecom wavelengths, a high storage fidelity of >98% has been achieved recently in an 167Er3+:Y2SiO5 depressed cladding waveguide with both ends directly connected with fiber arrays [see Fig. 4(d)].75 Therein, the fiber-like geometry of the FsLDW depressed cladding waveguide enables such a fiber-integrated design, which shows great potential for applications in fiber-based quantum networks.

FIG. 4.

Quantum memory performance of FsLDW RE:Y2SiO5 waveguides. (a) Normalized spin-wave echo intensities as a function of the storage time (up to a total time of 15 µs) in a Pr3+:Y2SiO5 double-line waveguide (see the inset).67 (b) Internal storage efficiency at different storage times for single photons (orange balls) and classical light (black circles) obtained from a Pr3+:Y2SiO5 single-line waveguide (see the inset).68 (c) The real part of the reconstructed process matrix as obtained by quantum process tomography from an 151Eu3+:Y2SiO5 depressed cladding waveguide (see the inset).74 (d) Total storage fidelity as a function of the average input photon number per qubit (red points: experimental results, blue solid line: the classical bound considering the finite storage efficiency and the Poissonian statistics of the input fields) obtained from an 167Er3+:Y2SiO5 depressed cladding waveguide (see the inset).75 Reproduced with permission from Corrielli et al. Phys. Rev. Appl. 5, 054013 (2016). Copyright 2016 American Physical Society; Seri et al. Optica 5, 934–941 (2018). Copyright 2018 Optica Publishing Group; Zhu et al. Phys. Rev. Lett. 128, 180501 (2022). Copyright 2022 American Physical Society; and Liu et al. Phys. Rev. Lett. 129, 210501 (2022). Copyright 2022 American Physical Society, respectively.

FIG. 4.

Quantum memory performance of FsLDW RE:Y2SiO5 waveguides. (a) Normalized spin-wave echo intensities as a function of the storage time (up to a total time of 15 µs) in a Pr3+:Y2SiO5 double-line waveguide (see the inset).67 (b) Internal storage efficiency at different storage times for single photons (orange balls) and classical light (black circles) obtained from a Pr3+:Y2SiO5 single-line waveguide (see the inset).68 (c) The real part of the reconstructed process matrix as obtained by quantum process tomography from an 151Eu3+:Y2SiO5 depressed cladding waveguide (see the inset).74 (d) Total storage fidelity as a function of the average input photon number per qubit (red points: experimental results, blue solid line: the classical bound considering the finite storage efficiency and the Poissonian statistics of the input fields) obtained from an 167Er3+:Y2SiO5 depressed cladding waveguide (see the inset).75 Reproduced with permission from Corrielli et al. Phys. Rev. Appl. 5, 054013 (2016). Copyright 2016 American Physical Society; Seri et al. Optica 5, 934–941 (2018). Copyright 2018 Optica Publishing Group; Zhu et al. Phys. Rev. Lett. 128, 180501 (2022). Copyright 2022 American Physical Society; and Liu et al. Phys. Rev. Lett. 129, 210501 (2022). Copyright 2022 American Physical Society, respectively.

Close modal

In addition to defining micro-/nano-photonic structures buried in the substrates, fs laser pulses are also capable of processing/structuring dielectric surfaces via similar nonlinear absorption processes to, e.g., waveguide fabrication. In this section, research on laser-induced periodic surface structures and selective etching is briefly reviewed.

With the tremendous development of material science and nanofabrication technology in the last decades, periodically nanostructured surfaces, e.g., plasmonic and dielectric metasurfaces, made of artificial subwavelength elements have been widely studied in advanced photonics technology and applications.76–83 Due to their powerful capability to efficiently manipulate light, tailored photonic functionalities, such as structure colors, data storage, enhanced absorption, and luminescence, based on conventional and emerging materials can be realized, holding great promise for enriching the designer’s toolbox with a view to addressing key performance features not available in existing planar photonics.77,81–83 For processing such periodic surface structures (PSSs), lithographic techniques, such as photolithography and electron beam lithography, followed by chemical or reactive ion beam etching and focused ion beam milling, are the commonly used methods. However, these nanofabrication techniques often call for complex and expensive apparatus, and the whole processing flow is generally quite complicated and time-consuming.

Alternatively, focused fs laser offers a powerful solution for direct preparation of PSSs within a single-step process, which is furthermore, widely applicable to a variety of materials, including metals, glasses, crystals, and polymers.4,13,25,84–92 In contrast to lithographic methods, laser-induced periodic surface structure (LIPSS) provides a mask-free, high-efficiency, and high-flexibility processing method for defining subwavelength features. Depending on the period/wavelength (Λ/λ) ratio, the LIPSSs can be divided into low- (Λ/λ > 0.5) and high-spatial-frequency LIPPSs (Λ/λ < 0.5).25,84 In addition, different Λ/λ values as well as periodic nanostructure features can be realized by adjusting fs laser parameters. Since it was first demonstrated on semiconductor surfaces, a great amount of effort has been put into elucidating the formation mechanism of LIPSSs.25,92 Several models concerning, e.g., scattering light field,93–97 propagating surface plasmon polariton,87,98,99 and nanoplasmonic near-field enhancement86 have been proposed, but a clear and precise physics picture of the LIPSS formation has not yet been finalized.25 Nevertheless, promising optoelectronics applications, such as vivid structural colors,100–104 optical birefringence based multi-dimensional data storage,105–107 enhanced optical absorption (e.g., “black” silicon),100,108 and improved electrical performance,109,110 have been enabled by LIPSSs based on different material systems.25 Up until now, demonstrations of LIPSS based on dielectrics have mostly been based on glasses, the formation of which is mainly attributed to the asymmetrically localized laser-field enhancement of the nanoplasma.25 In fact, a similar LIPSS model/mechanism can be applied straight to the dielectric crystal family, yet, related experimental demonstrations are rather rare. One of the major causes for this is the Coulomb explosion effect, which leads to an unstable state of the material surface, and thus only crater and groove structures, instead of fine LIPSSs, can be defined on the surface of wide-bandgap transparent crystals, such as LiNbO3.111–113 To this end, by heating up LiNbO3 and thus increasing its carrier density and conductivity, as well as inhibiting the Coulomb explosion effect, during fs laser processing, large-area LIPSSs with an average spacing of 174 ± 5 nm and enhanced optical absorption have been experimentally demonstrated in a recent study (see Fig. 5).114 Therein, it has been observed that the LIPSSs start to form when the temperature is increased above 300 °C and become uniform at around 500 °C [see Fig. 5(a)], where the optical absorption is largely enhanced [see Figs. 5(b) and 5(c)].114 Similar results have been subsequently demonstrated in Fe:LiNbO3 as well.115 The heating strategy used in these studies can be easily applied to dielectric crystals beyond LiNbO3, offering a promising approach to fabricating high-quality LIPSSs based on wide-bandgap transparent crystals.

FIG. 5.

(a) SEM images of LIPSSs on LiNbO3 surface with different sample temperatures (all the scale bars refer to 1 µm; the double arrows indicate the polarization direction of the used femtosecond laser). (b) Optical absorption spectra and (c) optical absorption at 800 nm of different LIPSSs.114 Reproduced with permission from Li et al. Photonics Res. 6, 789–793 (2018), Copyright 2018 Chinese Laser Press.

FIG. 5.

(a) SEM images of LIPSSs on LiNbO3 surface with different sample temperatures (all the scale bars refer to 1 µm; the double arrows indicate the polarization direction of the used femtosecond laser). (b) Optical absorption spectra and (c) optical absorption at 800 nm of different LIPSSs.114 Reproduced with permission from Li et al. Photonics Res. 6, 789–793 (2018), Copyright 2018 Chinese Laser Press.

Close modal

In addition to localized modification of the original physical properties, fs laser pulses are also capable of altering the chemical properties of the dielectric material within the focal volume. Although highly material-dependent, the localized modification process eventually leads to a remarkable enhancement in the chemical dissolution rate of the laser-irradiated regions compared to the unmodified bulk material, enabling selective chemical etching.116,117 Typically, the laser-induced modification regions act as the removing area or the etching mask in the subsequent etching process, which can be used for high precision and smooth 3D micro/nanostructure definition on the dielectric surfaces or deep into the substrate volume. Depending on the dimensions of the desired structures as well as the chemistry between the substrate material and chemical etchant, the etching time may vary from a few seconds up to several hours. This technique, also called FLICE (fs laser irradiation followed by chemical etching), has received a surge of interest since the first observation of this phenomenon in glasses,116–119 opening up new opportunities for defining 3D microstructures. In particular, the FLICE technique enables direct fabrication of embedded hollow microstructures integrated with optical waveguides within dielectrics with arbitrary 3D design freedom, which is quite promising for e.g., microfluidic channels and 3D optofluidic devices.6,116,117

The FLICE technique has been demonstrated to successfully define 3D microstructures with complex shapes in glasses.6,46,119–124 However, it is usually more challenging to implement laser-induced selective etching in dielectric crystals since they generally show much better chemical stability. Nevertheless, once the optimized laser irradiation parameters as well as a suitable etching recipe are met, a considerably high etching selectivity can be reached in certain dielectric crystals.116,117 For example, in a recent breakthrough study, an etching selectivity larger than 105 (the largest value ever achieved in laser-processed dielectric materials) has been experimentally demonstrated in laser-irradiated yttrium aluminum garnet (YAG) and sapphire crystals, enabling arbitrary 3D nanostructures with 100-nm feature sizes inside cm-scale laser crystals without brittle fractures.21 As a result, subwavelength air-pore photonic lattices [see Figs. 6(a) and 6(b)] have been fabricated by using which subwavelength diffraction gratings [see Fig. 6(c)] and microstructured optical waveguides [supporting diffraction-limited waveguide mode, see Fig. 6(d) and the inset] in YAG as well as mm-long nanopores in sapphire have been fabricated, introducing an exciting new dimension to standard fs laser micro-/nano-fabrication and offering a versatile tool to functionalizing conventional dielectric crystals toward future 3D nanophotonic integrated devices.21,116,117

FIG. 6.

(a) End-facet and (b) top view optical microscope images of YAG nanopore lattices enabled by laser-induced selective etching. (c) Subwavelength diffraction gratings and (d) microstructured optical waveguides defined by using the YAG nanopore lattices. The inset is the near-field image of the waveguide output mode measured at 1550 nm. Reproduced with permission from Ródenas et al. Nat. Photonics 13, 105–109 (2019). Copyright (2019) Springer Nature Limited.

FIG. 6.

(a) End-facet and (b) top view optical microscope images of YAG nanopore lattices enabled by laser-induced selective etching. (c) Subwavelength diffraction gratings and (d) microstructured optical waveguides defined by using the YAG nanopore lattices. The inset is the near-field image of the waveguide output mode measured at 1550 nm. Reproduced with permission from Ródenas et al. Nat. Photonics 13, 105–109 (2019). Copyright (2019) Springer Nature Limited.

Close modal

Furthermore, being a maskless, high-precision, and 3D micromachining technique, fs laser induced material modification can be used for surface lithography, which offers unique advantages in applied material universality and fabrication cost savings. In particular, most dielectric crystals suffer from significant difficulties in material integration/processing by complementary metal-oxide-semiconductor (CMOS) fabrication technology. In addition, fs laser micro-/nano-fabrication provides a promising path toward functionalization of dielectric crystals, especially in 3D devices, as well as integrated photonics. As a first step to this end, recently, the so-called fs laser assisted chemo-mechanical polish lithography (CMPL),125 as a physical variant of the FLICE, has been successfully applied in the fabrication of high-quality on-chip waveguides (with a propagation loss as low as 0.027 dB/cm)126 and micro-resonators (with an ultrahigh Q-factor up to 108)127 based on the thin-film LiNbO3 on insulator (LNOI) platform.30,65 Based on such a fs-laser-assisted CMPL fabrication process, subsequently, a reconfigurable multifunctional photonic integrated circuit (PIC),128 which integrates a high-extinction-ratio beam splitter, a 1 × 6 optical switch, a balanced 3 × 3 interferometer, and electro-optically switchable optical true delay lines (OTDLs) with meter-scale lengths,129 has been experimentally demonstrated, suggesting the great potential of such a fabrication recipe toward multifunctional LNOI integrated photonics. Accordingly, such a strategy can be applied to other dielectric crystal platforms, affording many “old” optical materials like LiNbO3 new opportunities in multifunctional PIC applications.

Before moving forward into the conclusion/outlook section, we believe it is necessary to briefly discuss here the impacts of optical aberration during laser fabrication. Fundamentally, the overall optical quality and device performance of photonic structures defined by fs laser micro-/nano-fabrication are critically dependent on a sequence of laser-induced effects, such as multiphoton absorption and heat diffusion, which are closely correlated with the focal conditions. As a result, a slight disturbance in the spatial distribution of a focused light beam leads to dramatic changes in the physical properties of fabricated structures and, therefore, the overall device performance.123,124,130,131 Therefore, flexibly adjusting the focal beam shape to cope with diverse fabrication scenarios is crucial with a view to achieving high-quality micro-/nano-photonic devices. The refractive index mismatch, usually around 0.5–1.5 in the case of crystals, between air and processed materials introduces optical aberrations, which leads to focus distortion during fabrication and thus severely reduces the processing accuracy/efficiency.123,130–134 In particular, the distortion becomes even more serious as the focal depth increases, strongly limiting the widespread applications of fs laser in nanophotonic structures/devices with high-quality 3D layout.123,130,131,135,136

Fs structured-light laser fabrication employing beam-shaping techniques, such as spatial light modulation (SLM), has experienced tremendous development in recent years, enabling high-accuracy aberration correction and, therefore, high-efficiency 3D processing in diverse materials.130 In such a scenario, the spatial distribution of laser intensity and induced modified area can be finely regulated over a wide range of depths (on a scale of >mm), which is essential for multi-layer processing and true 3D fabrication deep inside transparent dielectrics.131,136–139 By using the analytical expression for depth-dependent aberration correction proposed by Booth et al.,134,136,138,140,141 e.g., single-mode waveguides with uniform cross-sections and circular symmetric profiles at different depths in glasses can be experimentally achieved. Even more accurate aberration correction is also possible by applying closed loop optics with a real-time feedback system for optimizing the spatial phase distribution of a used fs laser.130,142–145 Therefore, fabrication of high-performance photonic structures/devices with on-demand geometric features can be readily implemented by using aberration-corrected fs laser with optimized beam shape and intensity distribution. As of yet, such a fabrication strategy is rarely seen in the definition of photonic structures based on dielectric crystals. A typical experimental demonstration so far has been 3D waveguides fabricated in diamond.146 

In this article, notable promising paths for the future development of fs-laser micro-/nano-fabrication of functional photonic structures in dielectric crystals are briefly highlighted. These nanophotonic features, together with other fs-laser-defined chip-integrated functionalities, are rapidly revolutionizing a broad range of photonic applications, from classic optics in optical communications and nonlinear optics to quantum regimes such as quantum photonics and optomechanics.15,46,63 To enable these, however, several important challenges need to be addressed. In this section, we discuss the key challenges ahead for the above-mentioned research topics and outline several exciting near- and long-term opportunities.

In terms of AOP-based 3D domain engineering, a sequence of research breakthroughs in recent years have enabled direct domain engineering with a resolution reduced to 30 nm inside a dielectric/ferroelectric crystal.24,32,33 Such a high resolution paves a new way for high-performance nonlinear optical frequency conversion based on QPM structures/devices, such as NPCs,23 and even ferroelectric-domain-wall-based nanoelectronic devices, e.g., photovoltaic devices and nonvolatile memories.147,148 One of the major technical challenges that impose limitations on the practical applications of AOP-based domain-engineered structures is their relatively small size. For example, the typical dimensions of 3D NPCs in recent demonstrations are limited to 100 μm.23 With a view to achieving high-efficiency nonlinear frequency conversion, an effective light–matter interaction length larger than the millimeter level is usually required. To this end, an effective approach is to employ a multifocal laser-writing strategy to facilitate fast domain engineering on a large scale. Alternatively, the combination of AOP-based domain engineering and whispering-gallery-mode (WGM) resonators, in which the guided light circulates in spheroidally shaped dielectrics, is a promising strategy for lengthening the effective light-mater interaction and thus enhancing nonlinear frequency conversion without enlarging the total footprint of the nonlinear devices.149–151 Such a strategy has been successfully demonstrated by using radial EFP and mm-sized/chip-integrated WGM resonators based on LiNbO3, providing a significant improvement in the nonlinear frequency conversion efficiency.152–155 By replacing the EFP with the state-of-the-art AOP, even finer domain engineering and, therefore, ultra-high efficiency nonlinear frequency conversion in a monolithic on-chip device can be expected. Moreover, the laser-writing-direction dependency of the recently demonstrated 3D nanodomain-engineering techniques can be further applied to ferroelectric crystals, such as lithium tantalate (LiTaO3) and potassium titanyl phosphate (KTP), beyond LiNbO3, holding great promise for boosting the development of high-quality 3D integrated nanodevices for advanced optoelectronics applications.

In the case of color center creation, fs laser writing has established itself as a promising alternative to ion/electron beam irradiation methods.22,56,57 However, the relevant mechanisms and theoretical models describing the fs-laser-induced color center generation have not been studied thoroughly yet. In addition, in this regard, all the laser processing parameters, including the laser wavelength, laser energy, repetition rate, laser polarization, exposure time, and pulse duration, need to be precisely adjusted and systematically researched. In addition, the relevant lattice structures and material properties have to be taken into consideration since, beyond diamond, fs-laser-induced color centers have been realized in a variety of crystals, such as silicon carbide (SiC),156 lithium fluoride (LiF),157,158 as well as some laser and nonlinear crystals.56 Overall, the research related to the fs laser writing of color centers in dielectric crystals is still in its infancy, and the applicable material scope will expand toward different applications together with the in-depth studies of experimental principles and relative material processing techniques. In terms of photonic integration of fabricated color centers and integrated photonic structures, such as waveguides and gratings, although there have been some promising attempts, alignment accuracy and coupling efficiency are very limited.57,61,159 For example, the combination of NV color centers and buried waveguide structures has been experimentally demonstrated in quantum grade diamonds by employing the same laser and positioning system, enabling alignment accuracy within micrometer resolution.61 Therein, the waveguide-NV coupling efficiency is estimated to be rather low. Improvement can be expected via optimization of the waveguide geometry and, therefore, the mode field. This work can be regarded as the beginning toward on-chip optical routing of single photons between NV color centers and optically integrated spin-based sensing applications, such as magnetometry, electrometry, and thermometry.61 Future attempts on this research topic will also continue to aim at accurate placement, yield enhancement, property improvement, and processing dimension expansion. Spatial light modulation technology and real-time monitoring/active control of the laser fabrication will be of great help in the process.22,56,57

On a different front, LIPSS has emerged as a promising fabrication strategy for enrichment, enhancement, and modification of existing photonic functionalities based on dielectrics. Although the experimental demonstration of LIPSS in dielectric crystals is rather rare, the successful experience in glasses and semiconductors can be fully borrowed. Meanwhile, the corresponding formation mechanism of LIPSSs for dielectrics needs to be well developed. To this end, a lot of efforts must be made in experimental and theoretical studies, especially ultrafast dynamics.25 Furthermore, 2D periodic nanoantenna arrays, or metasurfaces with subwavelength resolution and tailored functionalities in optical field manipulation, fabricated by 2D-LIPSS, are and will continue to be an exciting research topic that may evolve into an efficient alternative to lithographic techniques. Recently, the first demonstration of subwavelength 2D-LIPSSs based on dielectric crystals has been realized on diamond surfaces with a single step process, exploiting sequences of two temporally delayed and cross-polarized fs laser pulses generated by an interferometer-like configuration.160 This milestone study marks the starting point toward high-throughput laser fabrication of large-scale subwavelength dielectric metasurfaces for future planar optoelectronic applications.

Moreover, as the fs-laser micro-/nano-fabrication method is fully compatible with the existing optical fabrication techniques, including fs-laser direct writing of waveguides, gratings, microresonators, and photonic integrated circuits, the newly developed nanostructures, including but not limited to the above-mentioned ones, can be easily combined with well-developed designs/devices with a view to achieving multi-functional integrated 3D photonic systems for both classic and quantum photonics.11–15 

As a result of the constant quality improvement of fs-laser fabricated photonic structures, especially optical waveguides, in terms of waveguide loss and mode manipulation, their application scope has been smoothly extended to topological physics and quantum information processing. In particular, fs-laser direct written arrays of evanescently coupled waveguides have been established as a multi-functional platform for supporting light propagation/evolution that reveals nontrivial bulk/edge topological states or exhibits intrinsic similarities with the quantum evolution of particle wave-functions, enabling the achievement of various innovative topological states, quantum physical concepts, and quantum information applications that are not feasible with other fabrication techniques. A major challenge ever-present for practical applications of the fabricated optical waveguide devices in PIC is high-efficiency optical coupling between waveguides and other external optical components, such as standard optical fibers. To this end, specially designed coupling fibers (such as lensed optical fibers161 and tapered optical fibers162,163) can be used with a view to reducing the large mode mismatch between standard optical fibers and waveguide devices.30,164

In addition to what we have described earlier, there are many other areas in physics and applications of fs laser micro-/nano-fabrication technology, e.g., 3D nanolithography21,165–167 and additive manufacturing,168,169 and the fabricated functional 3D structures for, e.g., optofluidics,170 bionics,171 and microbots,172 that we believe will undergo rapid development in the coming years. In addition, as indicated above, the possible developments in this area will benefit extensive domains from science to industry. Overall, the immediate future of fs-laser micro-/nano-fabrication is clear and bright. By further combining with dielectric crystal families, its versatility and complexity are fascinating and intriguing. We expect such a promising combination to make a significant impact on every corner of future photonics.

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 12174222 and 12074223), the Shandong Provincial Natural Science Foundation (Grant Nos. ZR2021ZD02 and 2022HWYQ-047), the Taishan Scholars Program of Shandong Province (Grant Nos. tspd20210303 and tsqn201909041), and the “Qilu Young Scholar Program” of Shandong University, China.

The authors have no conflicts to disclose.

Yuechen Jia: Conceptualization (lead); Funding acquisition (equal); Writing – original draft (lead); Writing – review & editing (lead). Feng Chen: Funding acquisition (equal); Resources (equal); Writing – review & editing (equal).

Data sharing is not applicable to this article as no new data were created or analyzed in this study.

1.
K.
Sugioka
and
Y.
Cheng
, “
Femtosecond laser three-dimensional micro- and nanofabrication
,”
Appl. Phys. Rev.
1
(
4
),
041303
(
2014
).
2.
K.
Sugioka
and
Y.
Cheng
, “
Ultrafast lasers—Reliable tools for advanced materials processing
,”
Light: Sci. Appl.
3
(
4
),
e149
(
2014
).
3.
M.
Malinauskas
,
A.
Zukauskas
,
S.
Hasegawa
,
Y.
Hayasaki
,
V.
Mizeikis
,
R.
Buividas
, and
S.
Juodkazis
, “
Ultrafast laser processing of materials: From science to industry
,”
Light: Sci. Appl.
5
(
8
),
e16133
(
2016
).
4.
D.
Tan
,
K. N.
Sharafudeen
,
Y.
Yue
, and
J.
Qiu
, “
Femtosecond laser induced phenomena in transparent solid materials: Fundamentals and applications
,”
Prog. Mater. Sci.
76
,
154
228
(
2016
).
5.
K.
Sugioka
, “
Progress in ultrafast laser processing and future prospects
,”
Nanophotonics
6
(
2
),
393
413
(
2017
).
6.
F.
Sima
,
K.
Sugioka
,
R. M.
Vázquez
,
R.
Osellame
,
L.
Kelemen
, and
P.
Ormos
, “
Three-dimensional femtosecond laser processing for lab-on-a-chip applications
,”
Nanophotonics
7
(
3
),
613
634
(
2018
).
7.
L.
Jiang
,
A. D.
Wang
,
B.
Li
,
T. H.
Cui
, and
Y. F.
Lu
, “
Electrons dynamics control by shaping femtosecond laser pulses in micro/nanofabrication: Modeling, method, measurement and application
,”
Light: Sci. Appl.
7
,
17134
(
2017
).
8.
X.-Q.
Liu
,
B.-F.
Bai
,
Q.-D.
Chen
, and
H.-B.
Sun
, “
Etching-assisted femtosecond laser modification of hard materials
,”
Opto-Electron. Adv.
2
(
9
),
190021
(
2019
).
9.
Z.
Lin
and
M.
Hong
, “
Femtosecond laser precision engineering: From micron, submicron, to nanoscale
,”
Ultrafast Sci.
2021
,
9783514
.
10.
Y.
Zhang
,
X.
Wang
,
K.
Yan
,
H.
Zhu
,
B.
Wang
, and
B.
Zou
, “
Laser micro/nano‐structuring pushes forward smart sensing: Opportunities and challenges
,”
Adv. Funct. Mater.
33
(
8
),
2211272
(
2023
).
11.
F.
Chen
and
J. R. V.
de Aldana
, “
Optical waveguides in crystalline dielectric materials produced by femtosecond‐laser micromachining
,”
Laser Photonics Rev.
8
(
2
),
251
275
(
2014
).
12.
Y.
Jia
,
S.
Wang
, and
F.
Chen
, “
Femtosecond laser direct writing of flexibly configured waveguide geometries in optical crystals: Fabrication and application
,”
Opto-Electron. Adv.
3
(
10
),
190042
(
2020
).
13.
B.
Zhang
,
L.
Wang
, and
F.
Chen
, “
Recent advances in femtosecond laser processing of LiNbO3 crystals for photonic applications
,”
Laser Photonics Rev.
14
(
8
),
1900407
(
2020
).
14.
L.
Li
,
W.
Kong
, and
F.
Chen
, “
Femtosecond laser-inscribed optical waveguides in dielectric crystals: A concise review and recent advances
,”
Adv. Photonics
4
(
2
),
024002
(
2022
).
15.
D.
Tan
,
Z.
Wang
,
B.
Xu
, and
J.
Qiu
, “
Photonic circuits written by femtosecond laser in glass: Improved fabrication and recent progress in photonic devices
,”
Adv. Photonics
3
(
2
),
024002
(
2021
).
16.
T.
Meany
,
M.
Gräfe
,
R.
Heilmann
,
A.
Perez‐Leija
,
S.
Gross
,
M. J.
Steel
,
M. J.
Withford
, and
A.
Szameit
, “
Laser written circuits for quantum photonics
,”
Laser Photonics Rev.
9
(
4
),
363
384
(
2015
).
17.
M.
Ams
,
P.
Dekker
,
S.
Gross
, and
M. J.
Withford
, “
Fabricating waveguide Bragg gratings (WBGs) in bulk materials using ultrashort laser pulses
,”
Nanophotonics
6
(
5
),
743
763
(
2017
).
18.
J.
Burghoff
,
C.
Grebing
,
S.
Nolte
, and
A.
Tünnermann
, “
Efficient frequency doubling in femtosecond laser-written waveguides in lithium niobate
,”
Appl. Phys. Lett.
89
(
8
),
081108
(
2006
).
19.
L.
Gui
,
B.
Xu
, and
T. C.
Chong
, “
Microstructure in lithium niobate by use of focused femtosecond laser pulses
,”
IEEE Photonics Technol. Lett.
16
(
5
),
1337
1339
(
2004
).
20.
V.
Apostolopoulos
,
L.
Laversenne
,
T.
Colomb
,
C.
Depeursinge
,
R. P.
Salathé
,
M.
Pollnau
,
R.
Osellame
,
G.
Cerullo
, and
P.
Laporta
, “
Femtosecond-irradiation-induced refractive-index changes and channel waveguiding in bulk Ti3+:Sapphire
,”
Appl. Phys. Lett.
85
(
7
),
1122
1124
(
2004
).
21.
A.
Ródenas
,
M.
Gu
,
G.
Corrielli
,
P.
Paiè
,
S.
John
,
A. K.
Kar
, and
R.
Osellame
, “
Three-dimensional femtosecond laser nanolithography of crystals
,”
Nat. Photonics
13
(
2
),
105
109
(
2019
).
22.
X. J.
Wang
,
H. H.
Fang
,
F. W.
Sun
, and
H. B.
Sun
, “
Laser writing of color centers
,”
Laser Photonics Rev.
16
(
1
),
2100029
(
2021
).
23.
Y.
Zhang
,
Y.
Sheng
,
S.
Zhu
,
M.
Xiao
, and
W.
Krolikowski
, “
Nonlinear photonic crystals: From 2D to 3D
,”
Optica
8
(
3
),
372
381
(
2021
).
24.
X.
Xu
,
T.
Wang
,
P.
Chen
,
C.
Zhou
,
J.
Ma
,
D.
Wei
,
H.
Wang
,
B.
Niu
,
X.
Fang
,
D.
Wu
,
S.
Zhu
,
M.
Gu
,
M.
Xiao
, and
Y.
Zhang
, “
Femtosecond laser writing of lithium niobate ferroelectric nanodomains
,”
Nature
609
(
7927
),
496
501
(
2022
).
25.
Y.
Zhang
,
Q.
Jiang
,
M.
Long
,
R.
Han
,
K.
Cao
,
S.
Zhang
,
D.
Feng
,
T.
Jia
,
Z.
Sun
,
J.
Qiu
, and
H.
Xu
, “
Femtosecond laser-induced periodic structures: Mechanisms, techniques, and applications
,”
Opto-Electron. Sci.
1
(
6
),
220005
(
2022
).
26.
V. Y.
Shur
,
A.
Akhmatkhanov
, and
I.
Baturin
, “
Micro-and nano-domain engineering in lithium niobate
,”
Appl. Phys. Rev.
2
(
4
),
040604
(
2015
).
27.
J.-J.
Wang
,
B.
Wang
, and
L.-Q.
Chen
, “
Understanding, predicting, and designing ferroelectric domain structures and switching guided by the phase-field method
,”
Annu. Rev. Mater. Res.
49
(
1
),
127
152
(
2019
).
28.
D.
Sun
,
Y.
Zhang
,
D.
Wang
,
W.
Song
,
X.
Liu
,
J.
Pang
,
D.
Geng
,
Y.
Sang
, and
H.
Liu
, “
Microstructure and domain engineering of lithium niobate crystal films for integrated photonic applications
,”
Light:Sci. Appl.
9
(
1
),
197
(
2020
).
29.
X.
Hu
,
Y.
Zhang
, and
S.
Zhu
, “
Nonlinear beam shaping in domain engineered ferroelectric crystals
,”
Adv. Mater.
32
(
27
),
1903775
(
2019
).
30.
Y.
Jia
,
L.
Wang
, and
F.
Chen
, “
Ion-cut lithium niobate on insulator technology: Recent advances and perspectives
,”
Appl. Phys. Rev.
8
(
1
),
011307
(
2021
).
31.
C. Y. J.
Ying
,
A. C.
Muir
,
C. E.
Valdivia
,
H.
Steigerwald
,
C. L.
Sones
,
R. W.
Eason
,
E.
Soergel
, and
S.
Mailis
, “
Light-mediated ferroelectric domain engineering and micro-structuring of lithium niobate crystals
,”
Laser Photonics Rev.
6
(
4
),
526
548
(
2012
).
32.
D.
Wei
,
C.
Wang
,
H.
Wang
,
X.
Hu
,
D.
Wei
,
X.
Fang
,
Y.
Zhang
,
D.
Wu
,
Y.
Hu
,
J.
Li
,
S.
Zhu
, and
M.
Xiao
, “
Experimental demonstration of a three-dimensional lithium niobate nonlinear photonic crystal
,”
Nat. Photonics
12
(
10
),
596
600
(
2018
).
33.
T.
Xu
,
K.
Switkowski
,
X.
Chen
,
S.
Liu
,
K.
Koynov
,
H.
Yu
,
H.
Zhang
,
J.
Wang
,
Y.
Sheng
, and
W.
Krolikowski
, “
Three-dimensional nonlinear photonic crystal in ferroelectric barium calcium titanate
,”
Nat. Photonics
12
(
10
),
591
595
(
2018
).
34.
J.
Imbrock
,
L.
Wesemann
,
S.
Kroesen
,
M.
Ayoub
, and
C.
Denz
, “
Waveguide-integrated three-dimensional quasi-phase-matching structures
,”
Optica
7
(
1
),
28
34
(
2020
).
35.
C. E.
Valdivia
,
C. L.
Sones
,
S.
Mailis
,
J. D.
Mills
, and
R. W.
Eason
, “
Ultrashort-pulse optically-assisted domain engineering in lithium niobate
,”
Ferroelectrics
340
(
1
),
75
82
(
2006
).
36.
J.
Thomas
,
V.
Hilbert
,
R.
Geiss
,
T.
Pertsch
,
A.
Tünnermann
, and
S.
Nolte
, “
Quasi phase matching in femtosecond pulse volume structured x-cut lithium niobate
,”
Laser Photonics Rev.
7
(
3
),
L17
L20
(
2013
).
37.
X.
Chen
,
P.
Karpinski
,
V.
Shvedov
,
K.
Koynov
,
B.
Wang
,
J.
Trull
,
C.
Cojocaru
,
W.
Krolikowski
, and
Y.
Sheng
, “
Ferroelectric domain engineering by focused infrared femtosecond pulses
,”
Appl. Phys. Lett.
107
(
14
),
141102
(
2015
).
38.
S.
Kroesen
,
K.
Tekce
,
J.
Imbrock
, and
C.
Denz
, “
Monolithic fabrication of quasi phase-matched waveguides by femtosecond laser structuring the χ(2) nonlinearity
,”
Appl. Phys. Lett.
107
(
10
),
101109
(
2015
).
39.
X.
Chen
,
P.
Karpinski
,
V.
Shvedov
,
A.
Boes
,
A.
Mitchell
,
W.
Krolikowski
, and
Y.
Sheng
, “
Quasi-phase matching via femtosecond laser-induced domain inversion in lithium niobate waveguides
,”
Opt. Lett.
41
(
11
),
2410
2413
(
2016
).
40.
J.
Imbrock
,
H.
Hanafi
,
M.
Ayoub
, and
C.
Denz
, “
Local domain inversion in MgO-doped lithium niobate by pyroelectric field-assisted femtosecond laser lithography
,”
Appl. Phys. Lett.
113
(
25
),
252901
(
2018
).
41.
Y.
Zhang
,
Z.
Gao
,
Z.
Qi
,
S.
Zhu
, and
N.
Ming
, “
Nonlinear Čerenkov radiation in nonlinear photonic crystal waveguides
,”
Phys. Rev. Lett.
100
(
16
),
163904
(
2008
).
42.
Y.
Sheng
,
A.
Best
,
H.-J.
Butt
,
W.
Krolikowski
,
A.
Arie
, and
K.
Koynov
, “
Three-dimensional ferroelectric domain visualization by Čerenkov-type second harmonic generation
,”
Opt. Express
18
(
16
),
16539
16545
(
2010
).
43.
A. W.
Elshaari
,
W.
Pernice
,
K.
Srinivasan
,
O.
Benson
, and
V.
Zwiller
, “
Hybrid integrated quantum photonic circuits
,”
Nat. Photonics
14
(
5
),
285
298
(
2020
).
44.
S.
Saravi
,
T.
Pertsch
, and
F.
Setzpfandt
, “
Lithium niobate on insulator: An emerging platform for integrated quantum photonics
,”
Adv. Opt. Mater.
9
(
22
),
2100789
(
2021
).
45.
G.
Moody
,
V. J.
Sorger
,
D. J.
Blumenthal
,
P. W.
Juodawlkis
,
W.
Loh
,
C.
Sorace-Agaskar
,
A. E.
Jones
,
K. C.
Balram
,
J. C. F.
Matthews
,
A.
Laing
,
M.
Davanco
,
L.
Chang
,
J. E.
Bowers
,
N.
Quack
,
C.
Galland
,
I.
Aharonovich
,
M. A.
Wolff
,
C.
Schuck
,
N.
Sinclair
,
M.
Lončar
,
T.
Komljenovic
,
D.
Weld
,
S.
Mookherjea
,
S.
Buckley
,
M.
Radulaski
,
S.
Reitzenstein
,
B.
Pingault
,
B.
Machielse
,
D.
Mukhopadhyay
,
A.
Akimov
,
A.
Zheltikov
,
G. S.
Agarwal
,
K.
Srinivasan
,
J.
Lu
,
H. X.
Tang
,
W.
Jiang
,
T. P.
McKenna
,
A. H.
Safavi-Naeini
,
S.
Steinhauer
,
A. W.
Elshaari
,
V.
Zwiller
,
P. S.
Davids
,
N.
Martinez
,
M.
Gehl
,
J.
Chiaverini
,
K. K.
Mehta
,
J.
Romero
,
N. B.
Lingaraju
,
A. M.
Weiner
,
D.
Peace
,
R.
Cernansky
,
M.
Lobino
,
E.
Diamanti
,
L. T.
Vidarte
, and
R. M.
Camacho
, “
2022 Roadmap on integrated quantum photonics
,”
J. Phys.: Photonics
4
(
1
),
012501
(
2022
).
46.
G.
Corrielli
,
A.
Crespi
, and
R.
Osellame
, “
Femtosecond laser micromachining for integrated quantum photonics
,”
Nanophotonics
10
(
15
),
3789
3812
(
2021
).
47.
J.-H.
Kim
,
S.
Aghaeimeibodi
,
J.
Carolan
,
D.
Englund
, and
E.
Waks
, “
Hybrid integration methods for on-chip quantum photonics
,”
Optica
7
(
4
),
291
308
(
2020
).
48.
S. M.
Eaton
,
J. P.
Hadden
,
V.
Bharadwaj
,
J.
Forneris
,
F.
Picollo
,
F.
Bosia
,
B.
Sotillo
,
A. N.
Giakoumaki
,
O.
Jedrkiewicz
,
A.
Chiappini
,
M.
Ferrari
,
R.
Osellame
,
P. E.
Barclay
,
P.
Olivero
, and
R.
Ramponi
, “
Quantum micro–nano devices fabricated in diamond by femtosecond laser and ion irradiation
,”
Adv. Quantum Technol.
2
(
5-6
),
1900006
(
2019
).
49.
S.
Atzeni
,
A. S.
Rab
,
G.
Corrielli
,
E.
Polino
,
M.
Valeri
,
P.
Mataloni
,
N.
Spagnolo
,
A.
Crespi
,
F.
Sciarrino
, and
R.
Osellame
, “
Integrated sources of entangled photons at the telecom wavelength in femtosecond-laser-written circuits
,”
Optica
5
(
3
),
311
314
(
2018
).
50.
F.
Lenzini
,
N.
Gruhler
,
N.
Walter
, and
W. H.
Pernice
, “
Diamond as a platform for integrated quantum photonics
,”
Adv. Quantum Technol.
1
(
3
),
1800061
(
2018
).
51.
E.
Janitz
,
M. K.
Bhaskar
, and
L.
Childress
, “
Cavity quantum electrodynamics with color centers in diamond
,”
Optica
7
(
10
),
1232
1252
(
2020
).
52.
S.
Pezzagna
and
J.
Meijer
, “
Quantum computer based on color centers in diamond
,”
Appl. Phys. Rev.
8
(
1
),
011308
(
2021
).
53.
K.
Liu
,
S.
Zhang
,
V.
Ralchenko
,
P.
Qiao
,
J.
Zhao
,
G.
Shu
,
L.
Yang
,
J.
Han
,
B.
Dai
, and
J.
Zhu
, “
Tailoring of typical color centers in diamond for photonics
,”
Adv. Mater.
33
(
6
),
2000891
(
2021
).
54.
A.
Haque
and
S.
Sumaiya
, “
An overview on the formation and processing of nitrogen-vacancy photonic centers in diamond by ion implantation
,”
J. Manuf. Mater. Process.
1
(
1
),
6
(
2017
).
55.
K.
Groot-Berning
,
T.
Kornher
,
G.
Jacob
,
F.
Stopp
,
S. T.
Dawkins
,
R.
Kolesov
,
J.
Wrachtrup
,
K.
Singer
, and
F.
Schmidt-Kaler
, “
Deterministic single-ion implantation of rare-earth ions for nanometer-resolution color-center generation
,”
Phys. Rev. Lett.
123
(
10
),
106802
(
2019
).
56.
S.
Gao
,
Y.-Z.
Duan
,
Z.-N.
Tian
,
Y.-L.
Zhang
,
Q.-D.
Chen
,
B.-R.
Gao
, and
H.-B.
Sun
, “
Laser-induced color centers in crystals
,”
Opt Laser. Technol.
146
,
107527
(
2022
).
57.
A. N.
Giakoumaki
,
G.
Coccia
,
V.
Bharadwaj
,
J. P.
Hadden
,
A. J.
Bennett
,
B.
Sotillo
,
R.
Yoshizaki
,
P.
Olivero
,
O.
Jedrkiewicz
,
R.
Ramponi
,
S. M.
Pietralunga
,
M.
Bollani
,
A.
Bifone
,
P. E.
Barclay
,
A.
Kubanek
, and
S. M.
Eaton
, “
Quantum technologies in diamond enabled by laser processing
,”
Appl. Phys. Lett.
120
(
2
),
020502
(
2022
).
58.
Y.-C.
Chen
,
P. S.
Salter
,
S.
Knauer
,
L.
Weng
,
A. C.
Frangeskou
,
C. J.
Stephen
,
S. N.
Ishmael
,
P. R.
Dolan
,
S.
Johnson
,
B. L.
Green
,
G. W.
Morley
,
M. E.
Newton
,
J. G.
Rarity
,
M. J.
Booth
, and
J. M.
Smith
, “
Laser writing of coherent colour centres in diamond
,”
Nat. Photonics
11
(
2
),
77
80
(
2016
).
59.
Y.
Liu
,
G.
Chen
,
M.
Song
,
X.
Ci
,
B.
Wu
,
E.
Wu
, and
H.
Zeng
, “
Fabrication of nitrogen vacancy color centers by femtosecond pulse laser illumination
,”
Opt. Express
21
(
10
),
12843
12848
(
2013
).
60.
V. V.
Kononenko
,
I. I.
Vlasov
,
V. M.
Gololobov
,
T. V.
Kononenko
,
T. A.
Semenov
,
A. A.
Khomich
,
V. A.
Shershulin
,
V. S.
Krivobok
, and
V. I.
Konov
, “
Nitrogen-vacancy defects in diamond produced by femtosecond laser nanoablation technique
,”
Appl. Phys. Lett.
111
(
8
),
081101
(
2017
).
61.
J. P.
Hadden
,
V.
Bharadwaj
,
B.
Sotillo
,
S.
Rampini
,
R.
Osellame
,
J. D.
Witmer
,
H.
Jayakumar
,
T. T.
Fernandez
,
A.
Chiappini
,
C.
Armellini
,
M.
Ferrari
,
R.
Ramponi
,
P. E.
Barclay
, and
S. M.
Eaton
, “
Integrated waveguides and deterministically positioned nitrogen vacancy centers in diamond created by femtosecond laser writing
,”
Opt. Lett.
43
(
15
),
3586
3589
(
2018
).
62.
Y.-C.
Chen
,
B.
Griffiths
,
L.
Weng
,
S. S.
Nicley
,
S. N.
Ishmael
,
Y.
Lekhai
,
S.
Johnson
,
C. J.
Stephen
,
B. L.
Green
,
G. W.
Morley
,
M. E.
Newton
,
M. J.
Booth
,
P. S.
Salter
, and
J. M.
Smith
, “
Laser writing of individual nitrogen-vacancy defects in diamond with near-unity yield
,”
Optica
6
(
5
),
662
667
(
2019
).
63.
A. W.
Elshaari
,
W.
Pernice
,
K.
Srinivasan
,
O.
Benson
, and
V.
Zwiller
, “
Hybrid integrated quantum photonic circuits
,”
Nat. Photonics
14
(
5
),
285
298
(
2020
).
64.
T.
Zhong
and
P.
Goldner
, “
Emerging rare-earth doped material platforms for quantum nanophotonics
,”
Nanophotonics
8
(
11
),
2003
2015
(
2019
).
65.
Y.
Jia
,
J.
Wu
,
X.
Sun
,
X.
Yan
,
R.
Xie
,
L.
Wang
,
Y.
Chen
, and
F.
Chen
, “
Integrated photonics based on rare-earth ion-doped thin-film lithium niobate
,”
Laser Photonics Rev.
16
(
9
),
2200059
(
2022
).
66.
M.
Zhong
,
M. P.
Hedges
,
R. L.
Ahlefeldt
,
J. G.
Bartholomew
,
S. E.
Beavan
,
S. M.
Wittig
,
J. J.
Longdell
, and
M. J.
Sellars
, “
Optically addressable nuclear spins in a solid with a six-hour coherence time
,”
Nature
517
(
7533
),
177
180
(
2015
).
67.
G.
Corrielli
,
A.
Seri
,
M.
Mazzera
,
R.
Osellame
, and
H.
de Riedmatten
, “
Integrated optical memory based on laser-written waveguides
,”
Phys. Rev. Appl.
5
(
5
),
054013
(
2016
).
68.
A.
Seri
,
G.
Corrielli
,
D.
Lago-Rivera
,
A.
Lenhard
,
H.
de Riedmatten
,
R.
Osellame
, and
M.
Mazzera
, “
Laser-written integrated platform for quantum storage of heralded single photons
,”
Optica
5
(
8
),
934
941
(
2018
).
69.
A.
Seri
,
D.
Lago-Rivera
,
A.
Lenhard
,
G.
Corrielli
,
R.
Osellame
,
M.
Mazzera
, and
H.
de Riedmatten
, “
Quantum storage of frequency-multiplexed heralded single photons
,”
Phys. Rev. Lett.
123
(
8
),
080502
(
2019
).
70.
C.
Liu
,
Z.-Q.
Zhou
,
T.-X.
Zhu
,
L.
Zheng
,
M.
Jin
,
X.
Liu
,
P.-Y.
Li
,
J.-Y.
Huang
,
Y.
Ma
,
T.
Tu
,
T.-S.
Yang
,
C.-F.
Li
, and
G.-C.
Guo
, “
Reliable coherent optical memory based on a laser-written waveguide
,”
Optica
7
(
2
),
192
197
(
2020
).
71.
C.
Liu
,
T. X.
Zhu
,
M. X.
Su
,
Y. Z.
Ma
,
Z. Q.
Zhou
,
C. F.
Li
, and
G. C.
Guo
, “
On-demand quantum storage of photonic qubits in an on-chip waveguide
,”
Phys. Rev. Lett.
125
(
26
),
260504
(
2020
).
72.
T.-X.
Zhu
,
C.
Liu
,
L.
Zheng
,
Z.-Q.
Zhou
,
C.-F.
Li
, and
G.-C.
Guo
, “
Coherent optical memory based on a laser-written on-chip waveguide
,”
Phys. Rev. Appl.
14
(
5
),
054071
(
2020
).
73.
M.-X.
Su
,
T.-X.
Zhu
,
C.
Liu
,
Z.-Q.
Zhou
,
C.-F.
Li
, and
G.-C.
Guo
, “
On-demand multimode optical storage in a laser-written on-chip waveguide
,”
Phys. Rev. A
105
(
5
),
052432
(
2022
).
74.
T. X.
Zhu
,
C.
Liu
,
M.
Jin
,
M. X.
Su
,
Y. P.
Liu
,
W. J.
Li
,
Y.
Ye
,
Z. Q.
Zhou
,
C. F.
Li
, and
G. C.
Guo
, “
On-demand integrated quantum memory for polarization qubits
,”
Phys. Rev. Lett.
128
(
18
),
180501
(
2022
).
75.
D. C.
Liu
,
P. Y.
Li
,
T. X.
Zhu
,
L.
Zheng
,
J. Y.
Huang
,
Z. Q.
Zhou
,
C. F.
Li
, and
G. C.
Guo
, “
On-demand storage of photonic qubits at telecom wavelengths
,”
Phys. Rev. Lett.
129
(
21
),
210501
(
2022
).
76.
P.
Genevet
,
F.
Capasso
,
F.
Aieta
,
M.
Khorasaninejad
, and
R.
Devlin
, “
Recent advances in planar optics: From plasmonic to dielectric metasurfaces
,”
Optica
4
(
1
),
139
152
(
2017
).
77.
G.
Li
,
S.
Zhang
, and
T.
Zentgraf
, “
Nonlinear photonic metasurfaces
,”
Nat. Rev. Mater.
2
(
5
),
17010
(
2017
).
78.
A.
Krasnok
,
M.
Tymchenko
, and
A.
Alù
, “
Nonlinear metasurfaces: A paradigm shift in nonlinear optics
,”
Mater. Today
21
(
1
),
8
21
(
2018
).
79.
L.
Kang
,
R. P.
Jenkins
, and
D. H.
Werner
, “
Recent progress in active optical metasurfaces
,”
Adv. Opt. Mater.
7
(
14
),
1801813
(
2019
).
80.
B.
Sain
,
C.
Meier
, and
T.
Zentgraf
, “
Nonlinear optics in all-dielectric nanoantennas and metasurfaces: A review
,”
Adv. Photonics
1
(
2
),
024002
(
2019
).
81.
C. W.
Qiu
,
T.
Zhang
,
G.
Hu
, and
Y.
Kivshar
, “
Quo Vadis, metasurfaces?
,”
Nano Lett.
21
(
13
),
5461
5474
(
2021
).
82.
A. S.
Solntsev
,
G. S.
Agarwal
, and
Y. S.
Kivshar
, “
Metasurfaces for quantum photonics
,”
Nat. Photonics
15
(
5
),
327
336
(
2021
).
83.
T.
Gu
,
H. J.
Kim
,
C.
Rivero-Baleine
, and
J.
Hu
, “
Reconfigurable metasurfaces towards commercial success
,”
Nat. Photonics
17
(
1
),
48
58
(
2023
).
84.
R.
Buividas
,
M.
Mikutis
, and
S.
Juodkazis
, “
Surface and bulk structuring of materials by ripples with long and short laser pulses: Recent advances
,”
Prog. Quantum Electron.
38
(
3
),
119
156
(
2014
).
85.
Y.
Shimotsuma
,
P. G.
Kazansky
,
J.
Qiu
, and
K.
Hirao
, “
Self-organized nanogratings in glass irradiated by ultrashort light pulses
,”
Phys. Rev. Lett.
91
(
24
),
247405
(
2003
).
86.
V. R.
Bhardwaj
,
E.
Simova
,
P. P.
Rajeev
,
C.
Hnatovsky
,
R. S.
Taylor
,
D. M.
Rayner
, and
P. B.
Corkum
, “
Optically produced arrays of planar nanostructures inside fused silica
,”
Phys. Rev. Lett.
96
(
5
),
057404
(
2006
).
87.
M.
Huang
,
F.
Zhao
,
Y.
Cheng
,
N.
Xu
, and
Z.
Xu
, “
Origin of laser-induced near-subwavelength ripples: Interference between surface plasmons and incident laser
,”
ACS Nano
3
(
12
),
4062
4070
(
2009
).
88.
A.
Rudenko
,
C.
Mauclair
,
F.
Garrelie
,
R.
Stoian
, and
J.-P.
Colombier
, “
Self-organization of surfaces on the nanoscale by topography-mediated selection of quasi-cylindrical and plasmonic waves
,”
Nanophotonics
8
(
3
),
459
465
(
2019
).
89.
Z.
Lin
,
H.
Liu
,
L.
Ji
,
W.
Lin
, and
M.
Hong
, “
Realization of ∼10 nm features on semiconductor surfaces via femtosecond laser direct patterning in far field and in ambient air
,”
Nano Lett.
20
(
7
),
4947
4952
(
2020
).
90.
A. Y.
Vorobyev
and
C.
Guo
, “
Direct femtosecond laser surface nano/microstructuring and its applications
,”
Laser Photonics Rev.
7
(
3
),
385
407
(
2013
).
91.
F.
Fraggelakis
,
G.
Mincuzzi
,
J.
Lopez
,
I.
Manek-Hönninger
, and
R.
Kling
, “
Controlling 2D laser nano structuring over large area with double femtosecond pulses
,”
Appl. Surf. Sci.
470
,
677
686
(
2019
).
92.
M.
Birnbaum
, “
Semiconductor surface damage produced by Ruby lasers
,”
J. Appl. Phys.
36
(
11
),
3688
3689
(
2004
).
93.
S.
Höhm
,
A.
Rosenfeld
,
J.
Krüger
, and
J.
Bonse
, “
Femtosecond laser-induced periodic surface structures on silica
,”
J. Appl. Phys.
112
(
1
),
014901
(
2012
).
94.
J.
Bonse
,
J.
Krüger
,
S.
Höhm
, and
A.
Rosenfeld
, “
Femtosecond laser-induced periodic surface structures
,”
J. Laser Appl.
24
(
4
),
042006
(
2012
).
95.
J.
Bonse
,
A.
Rosenfeld
, and
J.
Krüger
, “
On the role of surface plasmon polaritons in the formation of laser-induced periodic surface structures upon irradiation of silicon by femtosecond-laser pulses
,”
J. Appl. Phys.
106
(
10
),
104910
(
2009
).
96.
J.
Bonse
,
S.
Höhm
,
S. V.
Kirner
,
A.
Rosenfeld
, and
J.
Krüger
, “
Laser-induced periodic surface structures—A scientific evergreen
,”
IEEE J. Sel. Top. Quantum Electron.
23
(
3
),
9000615
(
2016
).
97.
G. D.
Tsibidis
,
E.
Skoulas
,
A.
Papadopoulos
, and
E.
Stratakis
, “
Convection roll-driven generation of supra-wavelength periodic surface structures on dielectrics upon irradiation with femtosecond pulsed lasers
,”
Phys. Rev. B
94
(
8
),
081305
(
2016
).
98.
F.
Garrelie
,
J.-P.
Colombier
,
F.
Pigeon
,
S.
Tonchev
,
N.
Faure
,
M.
Bounhalli
,
S.
Reynaud
, and
O.
Parriaux
, “
Evidence of surface plasmon resonance in ultrafast laser-induced ripples
,”
Opt. Express
19
(
10
),
9035
9043
(
2011
).
99.
J.
Liu
,
X.
Jia
,
W.
Wu
,
K.
Cheng
,
D.
Feng
,
S.
Zhang
,
Z.
Sun
, and
T.
Jia
, “
Ultrafast imaging on the formation of periodic ripples on a Si surface with a prefabricated nanogroove induced by a single femtosecond laser pulse
,”
Opt. Express
26
(
5
),
6302
6315
(
2018
).
100.
L.
Chen
,
K.
Cao
,
Y.
Li
,
J.
Liu
,
S.
Zhang
,
D.
Feng
,
Z.
Sun
, and
T.
Jia
, “
Large-area straight, regular periodic surface structures produced on fused silica by the interference of two femtosecond laser beams through cylindrical lens
,”
Opto-Electron. Adv.
4
(
12
),
200036
(
2021
).
101.
S.
Gräf
,
C.
Kunz
,
A.
Undisz
,
R.
Wonneberger
,
M.
Rettenmayr
, and
F. A.
Müller
, “
Mechano-responsive colour change of laser-induced periodic surface structures
,”
Appl. Surf. Sci.
471
,
645
651
(
2019
).
102.
W.
Liu
,
L.
Jiang
,
W.
Han
,
J.
Hu
,
X.
Li
,
J.
Huang
,
S.
Zhan
, and
Y.
Lu
, “
Manipulation of LIPSS orientation on silicon surfaces using orthogonally polarized femtosecond laser double-pulse trains
,”
Opt. Express
27
(
7
),
9782
9793
(
2019
).
103.
J. S.
Hwang
,
J.-E.
Park
,
G. W.
Kim
,
H.
Lee
, and
M.
Yang
, “
Fabrication of printable nanograting using solution-based laser-induced periodic surface structure process
,”
Appl. Surf. Sci.
547
,
149178
(
2021
).
104.
J.
Huang
,
L.
Jiang
,
X.
Li
,
A.
Wang
,
Z.
Wang
,
Q.
Wang
,
J.
Hu
,
L.
Qu
,
T.
Cui
, and
Y.
Lu
, “
Fabrication of highly homogeneous and controllable nanogratings on silicon via chemical etching-assisted femtosecond laser modification
,”
Nanophotonics
8
(
5
),
869
878
(
2019
).
105.
J.
Zhang
,
M.
Gecevičius
,
M.
Beresna
, and
P. G.
Kazansky
, “
Seemingly unlimited lifetime data storage in nanostructured glass
,”
Phys. Rev. Lett.
112
(
3
),
033901
(
2014
).
106.
Y.
Lei
,
M.
Sakakura
,
L.
Wang
,
Y.
Yu
,
H.
Wang
,
G.
Shayeganrad
, and
P. G.
Kazansky
, “
High speed ultrafast laser anisotropic nanostructuring by energy deposition control via near-field enhancement
,”
Optica
8
(
11
),
1365
1371
(
2021
).
107.
H.
Wang
,
Y.
Lei
,
L.
Wang
,
M.
Sakakura
,
Y.
Yu
,
G.
Shayeganrad
, and
P. G.
Kazansky
, “
100‐layer error‐free 5D optical data storage by ultrafast laser nanostructuring in glass
,”
Laser Photonics Rev.
16
(
4
),
2100563
(
2022
).
108.
J.
Yang
,
F.
Luo
,
T. S.
Kao
,
X.
Li
,
G. W.
Ho
,
J.
Teng
,
X.
Luo
, and
M.
Hong
, “
Design and fabrication of broadband ultralow reflectivity black Si surfaces by laser micro/nanoprocessing
,”
Light: Sci. Appl.
3
(
7
),
e185
(
2014
).
109.
C.
Lopez-Santos
,
D.
Puerto
,
J.
Siegel
,
M.
Macias-Montero
,
C.
Florian
,
J.
Gil-Rostra
,
V.
López-Flores
,
A.
Borras
,
A. R.
González-Elipe
, and
J.
Solis
, “
Anisotropic resistivity surfaces produced in ITO films by laser-induced nanoscale self-organization
,”
Adv. Opt. Mater.
9
(
2
),
2001086
(
2021
).
110.
A.
Cubero
,
E.
Martínez
,
L. A.
Angurel
,
G. F.
de la Fuente
,
R.
Navarro
,
H.
Legall
,
J.
Krüger
, and
J.
Bonse
, “
Effects of laser-induced periodic surface structures on the superconducting properties of Niobium
,”
Appl. Surf. Sci.
508
,
145140
(
2020
).
111.
B.
Yu
,
P.
Lu
,
N.
Dai
,
Y.
Li
,
X.
Wang
,
Y.
Wang
, and
Q.
Zheng
, “
Femtosecond laser-induced sub-wavelength modification in lithium niobate single crystal
,”
J. Opt. A: Pure Appl. Opt.
10
(
3
),
035301
(
2008
).
112.
H.
Shimizu
,
G.
Obara
,
M.
Terakawa
,
E.
Mazur
, and
M.
Obara
, “
Evolution of femtosecond laser-induced surface ripples on lithium niobate crystal surfaces
,”
Appl. Phys. Express
6
(
11
),
112701
(
2013
).
113.
M.
Straub
,
B.
Weigand
,
M.
Afshar
,
D.
Feili
,
H.
Seidel
, and
K.
König
, “
Periodic subwavelength ripples on lithium niobate surfaces generated by tightly focused sub-15 femtosecond sub-nanojoule pulsed near-infrared laser light
,”
J. Opt.
15
(
5
),
055601
(
2013
).
114.
Q.
Li
,
Q.
Wu
,
Y.
Li
,
C.
Zhang
,
Z.
Jia
,
J.
Yao
,
J.
Sun
, and
J.
Xu
, “
Femtosecond laser-induced periodic surface structures on lithium niobate crystal benefiting from sample heating
,”
Photonics Res.
6
(
8
),
789
793
(
2018
).
115.
Y.
Li
,
Q.
Wu
,
M.
Yang
,
Q.
Li
,
Z.
Chen
,
C.
Zhang
,
J.
Sun
,
J.
Yao
, and
J.
Xu
, “
Uniform deep-subwavelength ripples produced on temperature controlled LiNbO3:Fe crystal surface via femtosecond laser ablation
,”
Appl. Surf. Sci.
478
,
779
783
(
2019
).
116.
D.
Choudhury
,
J. R.
Macdonald
, and
A. K.
Kar
, “
Ultrafast laser inscription: Perspectives on future integrated applications
,”
Laser Photonics Rev.
8
(
6
),
827
846
(
2014
).
117.
X.-Q.
Liu
,
B.-F.
Bai
,
Q.-D.
Chen
, and
H.-B.
Sun
, “
Etching-assisted femtosecond laser modification of hard materials
,”
Opto-Electron. Adv.
2
(
9
),
19002101
19002114
(
2019
).
118.
Y.
Kondo
,
T.
Suzuki
,
H.
Inouye
,
K.
Miura
,
T.
Mitsuyu
, and
K.
Hirao
, “
Three-dimensional microscopic crystallization in photosensitive glass by femtosecond laser pulses at nonresonant wavelength
,”
Jpn. J. Appl. Phys.
37
(
1A
),
L94
L96
(
1998
).
119.
A.
Marcinkevičius
,
S.
Juodkazis
,
M.
Watanabe
,
M.
Miwa
,
S.
Matsuo
,
H.
Misawa
, and
J.
Nishii
, “
Femtosecond laser-assisted three-dimensional microfabrication in silica
,”
Opt. Lett.
26
(
5
),
277
279
(
2001
).
120.
K.
Sugioka
,
Y.
Cheng
, and
K.
Midorikawa
, “
Three-dimensional micromachining of glass using femtosecond laser for lab-on-a-chip device manufacture
,”
Appl. Phys. A
81
(
1
),
1
10
(
2005
).
121.
C.
Hnatovsky
,
R. S.
Taylor
,
E.
Simova
,
P. P.
Rajeev
,
D. M.
Rayner
,
V. R.
Bhardwaj
, and
P. B.
Corkum
, “
Fabrication of microchannels in glass using focused femtosecond laser radiation and selective chemical etching
,”
Appl. Phys. A
84
(
1-2
),
47
61
(
2006
).
122.
R.
Osellame
,
V.
Maselli
,
R. M.
Vazquez
,
R.
Ramponi
, and
G.
Cerullo
, “
Integration of optical waveguides and microfluidic channels both fabricated by femtosecond laser irradiation
,”
Appl. Phys. Lett.
90
(
23
),
231118
(
2007
).
123.
D.
Tan
,
Z.
Wang
,
B.
Xu
, and
J.
Qiu
, “
Photonic circuits written by femtosecond laser in glass: Improved fabrication and recent progress in photonic devices
,”
Advanced Photonics
3
(
02
),
024002
(
2021
)..
124.
S.
Gross
and
M. J.
Withford
, “
Ultrafast-laser-inscribed 3D integrated photonics: Challenges and emerging applications
,”
Nanophotonics
4
(
3
),
332
352
(
2015
).
125.
M.
Wang
,
R.
Wu
,
J.
Lin
,
J.
Zhang
,
Z.
Fang
,
Z.
Chai
, and
Y.
Cheng
, “
Chemo-mechanical polish lithography: A pathway to low loss large-scale photonic integration on lithium niobate on insulator
,”
Quantum Eng.
1
(
1
),
e9
(
2019
).
126.
R.
Wu
,
M.
Wang
,
J.
Xu
,
J.
Qi
,
W.
Chu
,
Z.
Fang
,
J.
Zhang
,
J.
Zhou
,
L.
Qiao
,
Z.
Chai
,
J.
Lin
, and
Y.
Cheng
, “
Long low-loss-litium niobate on insulator waveguides with sub-nanometer surface roughness
,”
Nanomaterials
8
(
11
),
910
(
2018
).
127.
R.
Gao
,
H.
Zhang
,
F.
Bo
,
W.
Fang
,
Z.
Hao
,
N.
Yao
,
J.
Lin
,
J.
Guan
,
L.
Deng
,
M.
Wang
,
L.
Qiao
, and
Y.
Cheng
, “
Broadband highly efficient nonlinear optical processes in on-chip integrated lithium niobate microdisk resonators of Q-factor above 108
,”
New J. Phys.
23
(
12
),
123027
(
2021
).
128.
R.
Wu
,
J.
Lin
,
M.
Wang
,
Z.
Fang
,
W.
Chu
,
J.
Zhang
,
J.
Zhou
, and
Y.
Cheng
, “
Fabrication of a multifunctional photonic integrated chip on lithium niobate on insulator using femtosecond laser-assisted chemomechanical polish
,”
Opt. Lett.
44
(
19
),
4698
4701
(
2019
).
129.
J.-x.
Zhou
,
R.-h.
Gao
,
J.
Lin
,
M.
Wang
,
W.
Chu
,
W.-b.
Li
,
D.-f.
Yin
,
L.
Deng
,
Z.-w.
Fang
,
J.-h.
Zhang
,
R.-b.
Wu
, and
Y.
Cheng
, “
Electro-optically switchable optical true delay lines of meter-scale lengths fabricated on lithium niobate on insulator using photolithography assisted chemo-mechanical etching
,”
Chin. Phys. Lett.
37
(
8
),
084201
(
2020
).
130.
X.
Zang
,
Z.
Liu
,
Y.
Xu
,
Y.
Wang
,
Q.
Wang
,
Z.
Li
, and
L.
Wang
, “
Spatial light modulation for femtosecond laser manufacturing: Current developments and challenges
,”
Sci. China: Technol. Sci.
66
(
2023
).
131.
X.
Wang
,
H.
Yu
,
P.
Li
,
Y.
Zhang
,
Y.
Wen
,
Y.
Qiu
,
Z.
Liu
,
Y.
Li
, and
L.
Liu
, “
Femtosecond laser-based processing methods and their applications in optical device manufacturing: A review
,”
Opt Laser. Technol.
135
,
106687
(
2021
).
132.
A.
Marcinkevičius
,
V.
Mizeikis
,
S.
Juodkazis
,
S.
Matsuo
, and
H.
Misawa
, “
Effect of refractive index-mismatch on laser microfabrication in silica glass
,”
Appl. Phys. A: Mater. Sci. Process.
76
(
2
),
257
260
(
2003
).
133.
N.
Huot
,
R.
Stoian
,
A.
Mermillod-Blondin
,
C.
Mauclair
, and
E.
Audouard
, “
Analysis of the effects of spherical aberration on ultrafast laser-induced refractive index variation in glass
,”
Opt. Express
15
(
19
),
12395
12408
(
2007
).
134.
L.
Huang
,
P. S.
Salter
,
F.
Payne
, and
M. J.
Booth
, “
Aberration correction for direct laser written waveguides in a transverse geometry
,”
Opt. Express
24
(
10
),
10565
10574
(
2016
).
135.
V.
Diez-Blanco
,
J.
Siegel
,
A.
Ferrer
,
A.
Ruiz de la Cruz
, and
J.
Solis
, “
Deep subsurface waveguides with circular cross section produced by femtosecond laser writing
,”
Appl. Phys. Lett.
91
(
5
),
051104
(
2007
).
136.
P. S.
Salter
and
M. J.
Booth
, “
Adaptive optics in laser processing
,”
Light: Sci. Appl.
8
(
1
),
110
(
2019
).
137.
J.
Cui
,
J.
Antonello
,
A. R.
Kirkpatrick
,
P. S.
Salter
, and
M. J.
Booth
, “
Generalised adaptive optics method for high-NA aberration-free refocusing in refractive-index-mismatched media
,”
Opt. Express
30
(
7
),
11809
11824
(
2022
).
138.
N.
Bisch
,
J.
Guan
,
M. J.
Booth
, and
P. S.
Salter
, “
Adaptive optics aberration correction for deep direct laser written waveguides in the heating regime
,”
Appl. Phys. A
125
(
5
),
364
(
2019
).
139.
H.
Zhang
,
J.
Xu
,
H.
Li
,
Y.
Xiao
,
W.
Cheng
,
X.
Tang
, and
Y.
Qin
, “
Stealth dicing of 1-mm-thick glass with aberration-free axial multi-focus beams
,”
Opt. Lett.
47
(
12
),
3003
3006
(
2022
).
140.
M. J.
Booth
,
M. A. A.
Neil
, and
T.
Wilson
, “
Aberration correction for confocal imaging in refractive-index-mismatched media
,”
J. Microsc.
192
(
2
),
90
98
(
1998
).
141.
M. J.
Booth
,
M.
Schwertner
,
T.
Wilson
,
M.
Nakano
,
Y.
Kawata
,
M.
Nakabayashi
, and
S.
Miyata
, “
Predictive aberration correction for multilayer optical data storage
,”
Appl. Phys. Lett.
88
(
3
),
031109
(
2006
).
142.
J.
Hering
,
E. H.
Waller
, and
G.
Von Freymann
, “
Automated aberration correction of arbitrary laser modes in high numerical aperture systems
,”
Opt. Express
24
(
25
),
28500
28508
(
2016
).
143.
A.
Jesacher
,
G. D.
Marshall
,
T.
Wilson
, and
M. J.
Booth
, “
Adaptive optics for direct laser writing with plasma emission aberration sensing
,”
Opt. Express
18
(
2
),
656
661
(
2010
).
144.
C.
Mauclair
,
A.
Mermillod-Blondin
,
N.
Huot
,
E.
Audouard
, and
R.
Stoian
, “
Ultrafast laser writing of homogeneous longitudinal waveguides in glasses using dynamic wavefront correction
,”
Opt. Express
16
(
8
),
5481
5492
(
2008
).
145.
S.
Hasegawa
and
Y.
Hayasaki
, “
Femtosecond laser processing with adaptive optics based on convolutional neural network
,”
Opt. Lasers Eng.
141
,
106563
(
2021
).
146.
A.
Courvoisier
,
M. J.
Booth
, and
P. S.
Salter
, “
Inscription of 3D waveguides in diamond using an ultrafast laser
,”
Appl. Phys. Lett.
109
(
3
),
031109
(
2016
).
147.
D.
Meier
and
S. M.
Selbach
, “
Ferroelectric domain walls for nanotechnology
,”
Nat. Rev. Mater.
7
(
3
),
157
173
(
2021
).
148.
P.
Sharma
,
Q.
Zhang
,
D.
Sando
,
C. H.
Lei
,
Y.
Liu
,
J.
Li
,
V.
Nagarajan
, and
J.
Seidel
, “
Nonvolatile ferroelectric domain wall memory
,”
Sci. Adv.
3
(
6
),
e1700512
(
2017
).
149.
I.
Breunig
, “
Three-wave mixing in whispering gallery resonators
,”
Laser Photonics Rev.
10
(
4
),
569
587
(
2016
).
150.
D.
Yu
,
M.
Humar
,
K.
Meserve
,
R. C.
Bailey
,
S. N.
Chormaic
, and
F.
Vollmer
, “
Whispering-gallery-mode sensors for biological and physical sensing
,”
Nat. Rev. Methods Primers
1
(
1
),
83
(
2021
).
151.
N.
Toropov
,
G.
Cabello
,
M. P.
Serrano
,
R. R.
Gutha
,
M.
Rafti
, and
F.
Vollmer
, “
Review of biosensing with whispering-gallery mode lasers
,”
Light: Sci. Appl.
10
(
1
),
42
(
2021
).
152.
S.-K.
Meisenheimer
,
J. U.
Fürst
,
C.
Werner
,
T.
Beckmann
,
K.
Buse
, and
I.
Breunig
, “
Broadband infrared spectroscopy using optical parametric oscillation in a radially-poled whispering gallery resonator
,”
Opt. Express
23
(
18
),
24042
24047
(
2015
).
153.
S. J.
Herr
,
C. S.
Werner
,
K.
Buse
, and
I.
Breunig
, “
Quasi-phase-matched self-pumped optical parametric oscillation in a micro-resonator
,”
Opt. Express
26
(
8
),
10813
10819
(
2018
).
154.
J.
Lu
,
J. B.
Surya
,
X.
Liu
,
A. W.
Bruch
,
Z.
Gong
,
Y.
Xu
, and
H. X.
Tang
, “
Periodically poled thin-film lithium niobate microring resonators with a second-harmonic generation efficiency of 250,000%/W
,”
Optica
6
(
12
),
1455
1460
(
2019
).
155.
J.
Lu
,
A.
Al Sayem
,
Z.
Gong
,
J. B.
Surya
,
C.-L.
Zou
, and
H. X.
Tang
, “
Ultralow-threshold thin-film lithium niobate optical parametric oscillator
,”
Optica
8
(
4
),
539
544
(
2021
).
156.
S.
Castelletto
,
A. F. M.
Almutairi
,
K.
Kumagai
,
T.
Katkus
,
Y.
Hayasaki
,
B. C.
Johnson
, and
S.
Juodkazis
, “
Photoluminescence in hexagonal silicon carbide by direct femtosecond laser writing
,”
Opt. Lett.
43
(
24
),
6077
6080
(
2018
).
157.
T.
Kurobori
,
K. i.
Kawamura
,
M.
Hirano
, and
H.
Hosono
, “
Simultaneous fabrication of laser-active colour centres and permanent microgratings in lithium fluoride by a single femtosecond pulse
,”
J. Phys.: Condens. Matter
15
(
25
),
L399
(
2003
).
158.
E. F.
Martynovich
,
V. P.
Dresvyansky
,
A. L.
Rakevich
,
N. L.
Lazareva
,
M. A.
Arsentieva
,
A. A.
Tyutrin
,
O.
Bukhtsoozh
,
S.
Enkhbat
,
P. V.
Kostryukov
,
B. E.
Perminov
, and
A. V.
Konyashchenko
, “
Creating of luminescent defects in crystalline media by a scanning laser beam
,”
Appl. Phys. Lett.
114
(
12
),
121901
(
2019
).
159.
M.
Hoese
,
M. K.
Koch
,
V.
Bharadwaj
,
J.
Lang
,
J. P.
Hadden
,
R.
Yoshizaki
,
A. N.
Giakoumaki
,
R.
Ramponi
,
F.
Jelezko
,
S. M.
Eaton
, and
A.
Kubanek
, “
Integrated magnetometry platform with stackable waveguide-assisted detection channels for sensing arrays
,”
Phys. Rev. Appl.
15
(
5
),
054059
(
2021
).
160.
M.
Mastellone
,
A.
Bellucci
,
M.
Girolami
,
V.
Serpente
,
R.
Polini
,
S.
Orlando
,
A.
Santagata
,
E.
Sani
,
F.
Hitzel
, and
D. M.
Trucchi
, “
Deep-subwavelength 2D periodic surface nanostructures on diamond by double-pulse femtosecond laser irradiation
,”
Nano Lett.
21
(
10
),
4477
4483
(
2021
).
161.
C.
Wang
,
X.
Xiong
,
N.
Andrade
,
V.
Venkataraman
,
X.-F.
Ren
,
G.-C.
Guo
, and
M.
Lončar
, “
Second harmonic generation in nano-structured thin-film lithium niobate waveguides
,”
Opt. Express
25
(
6
),
6963
6973
(
2017
).
162.
C.
Wang
,
M. J.
Burek
,
Z.
Lin
,
H. A.
Atikian
,
V.
Venkataraman
,
I. C.
Huang
,
P.
Stark
, and
M.
Lončar
, “
Integrated high quality factor lithium niobate microdisk resonators
,”
Opt. Express
22
(
25
),
30924
30933
(
2014
).
163.
N.
Yao
,
J.
Zhou
,
R.
Gao
,
J.
Lin
,
M.
Wang
,
Y.
Cheng
,
W.
Fang
, and
L.
Tong
, “
Efficient light coupling between an ultra-low loss lithium niobate waveguide and an adiabatically tapered single mode optical fiber
,”
Opt. Express
28
(
8
),
12416
12423
(
2020
).
164.
D.
Zhu
,
L.
Shao
,
M.
Yu
,
R.
Cheng
,
B.
Desiatov
,
C. J.
Xin
,
Y.
Hu
,
J.
Holzgrafe
,
S.
Ghosh
,
A.
Shams-Ansari
,
E.
Puma
,
N.
Sinclair
,
C.
Reimer
,
M.
Zhang
, and
M.
Lončar
, “
Integrated photonics on thin-film lithium niobate
,”
Adv. Opt. Photonics
13
(
2
),
242
352
(
2021
).
165.
H.
Xie
,
B.
Zhao
,
J.
Cheng
,
S. K.
Chamoli
,
T.
Zou
,
W.
Xin
, and
J.
Yang
, “
Super-regular femtosecond laser nanolithography based on dual-interface plasmons coupling
,”
Nanophotonics
10
(
15
),
3831
3842
(
2021
).
166.
K.
Sun
,
D.
Tan
,
X.
Fang
,
X.
Xia
,
D.
Lin
,
J.
Song
,
Y.
Lin
,
Z.
Liu
,
M.
Gu
,
Y.
Yue
, and
J.
Qiu
, “
Three-dimensional direct lithography of stable perovskite nanocrystals in glass
,”
Science
375
(
6578
),
307
310
(
2022
).
167.
K.
Sun
,
X.
Li
,
D.
Tan
,
H.
Jiang
,
K.
Xiong
,
J.
Zhang
,
B.
Xu
,
Z.
Xiao
,
Z.
Li
, and
J.
Qiu
, “
Pure blue perovskites nanocrystals in glass: Ultrafast laser direct writing and bandgap tuning
,”
Laser Photonics Rev.
17
(
5
),
2200902
(
2023
).
168.
S. K.
Saha
,
D.
Wang
,
V. H.
Nguyen
,
Y.
Chang
,
J. S.
Oakdale
, and
S.-C.
Chen
, “
Scalable submicrometer additive manufacturing
,”
Science
366
(
6461
),
105
109
(
2019
).
169.
A.
Jaiswal
,
C. K.
Rastogi
,
S.
Rani
,
G. P.
Singh
,
S.
Saxena
, and
S.
Shukla
, “
Two decades of two-photon lithography: Materials science perspective for additive manufacturing of 2D/3D nano-microstructures
,”
Iscience
26
,
106374
(
2023
).
170.
C.
Li
,
Y.
Liu
,
C.
Lang
,
Y.
Zhang
, and
S.
Qu
, “
Femtosecond laser direct writing of a 3D microcantilever on the tip of an optical fiber sensor for on-chip optofluidic sensing
,”
Lab Chip
22
(
19
),
3734
3743
(
2022
).
171.
L.
Wang
,
B.
Shi
,
H.
Zhao
,
X.
Qi
,
J.
Chen
,
J.
Li
,
Y.
Shang
,
K. K.
Fu
,
X.
Zhang
,
M.
Tian
, and
L.
Qu
, “
3D-printed parahydrophobic functional textile with a hierarchical nanomicroscale structure
,”
ACS Nano
16
(
10
),
16645
16654
(
2022
).
172.
Z.-C.
Ma
,
Y.-L.
Zhang
,
B.
Han
,
X.-Y.
Hu
,
C.-H.
Li
,
Q.-D.
Chen
, and
H.-B.
Sun
, “
Femtosecond laser programmed artificial musculoskeletal systems
,”
Nat. Commun.
11
(
1
),
4536
(
2020
).