1.6 µm ultrafast lasers are important in biomedical applications because the wavelength is located within an attractive biological window called the near-infrared-II (NIR-II) region. However, for erbium- or thulium-doped fibers, 1.6 μm is not their typical gain wavelength; therefore, realizing a high power femtosecond (fs) 1.6 μm laser is a challenging task. In this work, we propose a pump scheme assisted by a C-band laser. The new pump scheme can improve the gain at 1.6 μm with a mechanism originating from the re-absorption effect of the ground state and the in-band relaxation between the splitting energy levels 4I13/2b and 4I13/2a. Applying the pump scheme to the all-fiber large-mode-area (LMA) chirped pulse amplification (CPA) system, we achieve a record-high output power of ∼9.42 W, corresponding to a 262 nJ single pulse energy. The pulse duration after compression is ∼361 fs. Our approach of combining a LMA CPA system with a C-band auxiliary laser co-pumping scheme opens a way to increase the output power of an erbium-doped fiber laser by one order of magnitude in the 1600 nm region, even though this is a low gain region.

The 1.6 μm laser wavelength is in the near-infrared-II (NIR-II) biological window, which is very useful for deep multiphoton microscopy due to its lower scattering loss compared with a typical NIR-I biological window from 0.76 to 0.9 μm.1,2 The frequency-doubled light of an ultrafast 1.6 μm all-fiber laser is at ∼800 nm, which can also serve as a substitute for bulky Ti–sapphire lasers. For both erbium-doped fibers (EDFs) and thulium-doped fibers (TDFs), the 1.6 μm waveband is located in a low gain region,3,4 so realizing a high power 1.6 μm laser is difficult. For continuous wave (CW) 1.6 μm laser amplification, increasing the EDF length is an effective method to provide a sufficient gain for the 1.6 μm waveband5–8 because EDFs have a high re-absorption at the C-band so that lengthening the gain fiber could consume the C-band component, which, in turn, pumps the remaining Er3+ to increase the 1.6 μm gain. Various pumping schemes, such as auxiliary C-band pumping,9–12 in-band pumping,13,14 and 1018 nm laser pumping,15–17 were applied in long EDF amplifiers to further scale up the power of CW 1.6 μm lasers. These approaches are not suitable for ultrafast laser amplification because a long fiber will accumulate a severe nonlinearity. Designing an amplifier for a 1.6 μm ultrafast laser encounters difficulties in managing nonlinearity in the amplifier. Obtaining a stable 1.6 μm ultrafast seed is also not easy. A solid-state optical parameter oscillator (OPO) is an alternative to obtain a high-power laser at the 1.6 μm waveband18 but is so bulky.

Many high power CW 1.6 μm lasers have already been reported.10–17 However, there are few reports on high power 1.6 μm ultrafast lasers. Franck Morin et al. achieved an ∼605 fs, ∼460 mW, 1.6 μm SSFS laser in a large-mode-area (LMA) amplifier.19 However, the laser power of the SSFS cannot increase continuously with the pump power. In 2018, Kang et al. built a chirped pulse amplification (CPA) system for a 1.6 μm ultrafast laser, which could produce an output power of ∼167 mW, corresponding to a pulse energy of ∼14 nJ. However, 22% of the total amplified power was occupied by the C-band amplified spontaneous emission (ASE).20 In our previous study,21 we increased the 1.6 μm dissipative soliton (DS) laser power from 1 to 2 W by managing the gain fiber length, but the laser pulses degraded into a noise-like state in the long gain fiber.

In this paper, we construct a high power 1.6 μm fs CPA system. The CPA system contains five parts, which are a chirped 1.6 μm soliton-self-frequency-shift (SSFS) seed, three-stage pre-amplifiers, a double-pass amplifier, a C-band assisted LMA main amplifier, and a pulse compressor. The double-pass amplifier provides a watt-level injection laser power for the final main amplifier. To alleviate the nonlinearity in the main amplifier, the seed is highly chirped and the gain fiber in the main amplifier has a large-mode area. The auxiliary laser wavelength needs to be adjusted to correspond to the length of the LMA gain fiber. A tunable C-band (1530–1560 nm) laser allows flexible wavelength adjustment of the auxiliary laser. For an ∼5 m LMA gain fiber, a maximum output power of ∼9.42 W is achieved when injecting an ∼500 mW, 1550 nm laser as the auxiliary laser. For an ∼3 m LMA gain fiber, the auxiliary laser wavelength needs to be re-optimized because the absorption of the gain fiber has changed after reducing the length. The maximum output power achieved in the main amplifier with this shorter LMA gain fiber is ∼9.30 W. Considering the relatively long laser chain we built, the 1.6 μm seed should be highly chirped to a picosecond (ps). The high power ps-scale 1.6 μm laser after passing the LMA main amplifier is compressed to the fs-scale using a free-space grating pair. Compared with previous research about CW 1.6 μm lasers, this CPA laser system with the C-band auxiliary laser pumping scheme allows a much shorter gain fiber length to achieve a high power 1.6 μm amplification, which is more suitable for amplifying ultrafast 1.6 μm lasers.

Figure 1 shows the experimental setup of the high power 1.6 μm fs CPA system. The ultrafast 1.6 μm seed is generated by the SSFS technique based on a 1.56 μm femtosecond laser. The ∼36 MHz, 1.56 μm femtosecond laser is amplified using a piece of EDF (LIEKKI Er110-4/125) pumped using a 976 nm laser diode (LD) and then propagates through an ∼10 m SM1950 (Nufern) fiber to trigger a laser wavelength shift. The spectrum after the SM1950 fiber is shown in Fig. 1(b). A fiber filter (filter 1) is placed behind the SM1950 fiber to block the C-band component to get a pure ultrafast 1.6 μm seed. The 1.6 μm fs seed is stretched using an ∼55 m dispersion compensation fiber (DCF, DM1011-A, YOFC). The highly chirped 1.6 μm seed is further amplified using three pre-amplifiers. Between each amplifier, a C-band fiber filter (filter 2, filter 3, filter 4, or filter 6) guarantees a pure 1.6 μm amplified laser before the next amplifier. The injection power of the 1.6 μm laser is very important for each amplifier. If the injection power is too weak, the 1.6 μm signal laser cannot compete with the C-band ASE, which makes the 1.6 μm laser power saturate quickly. This is why there are many cascade amplifiers used in our system. After the three pre-amplifiers, the amplified pure 1.6 μm laser is injected into the double-pass amplifier constructed using an ∼3.5 m Er:Yb co-doped double-cladding fiber (Coractive DCF-EY-10/128H), through a circulator from port 1 to port 2. The double-pass amplifier can amplify the 1.6 μm laser directly to the watt-level power with a high suppression of the C-band ASE. In the double-pass amplifier, port 1 and port 3 of the circulator are spliced together to form a loop. In the loop, a fiber filter (filter 5) is used to remove the C-band ASE of the amplified forwarding laser. Using a wave division multiplexer (WDM), the C-band auxiliary CW laser is injected into the LMA main amplifier with the watt-level 1.6 μm laser.

FIG. 1.

(a) Experimental setup of the 10-W level high power 1.6 μm fs CPA system. (b) Spectrum after the SM1950 fiber. (c)–(f) Different spectra of the C-band auxiliary lasers.

FIG. 1.

(a) Experimental setup of the 10-W level high power 1.6 μm fs CPA system. (b) Spectrum after the SM1950 fiber. (c)–(f) Different spectra of the C-band auxiliary lasers.

Close modal

The passive fiber used in the main amplifier is an LMA fiber (IXF-2CF-PAS-25-250-0.08) having an ∼25 μm core diameter. The spectra of the C-band auxiliary lasers are shown in Figs. 1(c)1(f). The gain fiber (IXF-2CF-EY-O-25-250-COM) has the same core diameter as the passive fiber. The LMA gain fiber has the highest absorption of 76 dB/m at ∼1530 nm. The high absorption loss at the C-band suppresses the C-band ASE and guarantees sufficient absorption of the auxiliary laser. The output laser is collimated using a plano–convex mirror (M1). The ps-scale high power 1.6 μm laser is compressed using a free-space grating pair. M2 is a long-pass filter (LPF, No. 84672, Edmund Optics) that blocks most of the residual C-band laser.

The power of the laser injected into the LMA main amplifier should be maximized to suppress the C-band ASE. For this goal, we investigated two structures. Figure 2(a) shows the output power of the single-pass structure. After the C-band fiber filter (filter 6), the pure 1.6 μm laser saturates when the pump power increases to ∼10 W. The laser power is clamped at ∼1.2 W. From the measured spectra depicted in Fig. 2(b), the C-band ASE appears at the pump power of ∼10 W. At the maximum pump power of ∼17 W, the intensity of the C-band ASE is comparable to the 1.6 μm laser, which indicates that most of the pump power contributes to the C-band ASE. In the double-pass structure, the C-band ASE in the amplified forwarding laser is blocked using the fiber filter (filter 5) embedded in the loop constructed using the circulator. The returned pure amplified 1.6 μm laser is amplified using the Er:Yb co-doped double-cladding fiber again. At the maximum pump power of ∼17 W, the C-band ASE is suppressed better than in the single pass structure. The intensity of the C-band ASE is ∼25.138 dB lower than that of the amplified 1.6 μm laser, as shown in Fig. 2(d). After the fiber filter (filter 6), the highest pure amplified 1.6 μm laser power is ∼2.2 W, with a slope efficiency of ∼13.8%. The power increase trend in the double-pass structure is linear, and no power saturation is observed. The pulse duration of the double-pass structure at the maximum pump power of ∼17 W is ∼106.540 ps.

FIG. 2.

(a) Output power of the single-pass amplifier; (b) spectra of the amplified laser after the single-pass amplifier when the pump power is 17 and 10 W; (c) output power of the double-pass amplifier; (d) spectra of the amplified laser after the double-pass amplifier when the pump power is 17 and 0 W; and (e) pulse duration at the maximum laser power.

FIG. 2.

(a) Output power of the single-pass amplifier; (b) spectra of the amplified laser after the single-pass amplifier when the pump power is 17 and 10 W; (c) output power of the double-pass amplifier; (d) spectra of the amplified laser after the double-pass amplifier when the pump power is 17 and 0 W; and (e) pulse duration at the maximum laser power.

Close modal

In general, the main emission of the Er3+-doped fiber is concentrated in the C-band wavelength range of 1530–1565 nm. The maximum emission cross section is at ∼1530 nm. Due to the high re-absorption of the C-band wavelength, the ∼1560 nm wavelength has a maximum net gain. This explains why an erbium laser works at ∼1560 nm although the maximum emission cross section is at ∼1530 nm. As shown in Fig. 3, the particles in the ground state absorb the pump energy to jump to the upper state and then decay to the 4I13/2 energy level. The population inversion between 4I13/2 and the ground state corresponds to a laser emission at a C-band wavelength. The C-band and 1.6 μm emissions share one 4I13/2 energy level splitting into two sub energy levels, which are 4I13/2b and 4I13/2a. The 1.6 μm emission occurs between 4I13/2b and the ground state. Taking advantage of the high re-absorption of the EDF at the C-band wavelength, a long active fiber will absorb the C-band laser, achieving rapid in-band relaxation between 4I13/2b and 4I13/2a. The 4I13/2b energy level acts as a reservoir, which provides particles for 4I13/2a to achieve population inversion between 4I13/2b and the ground state.

FIG. 3.

Energy level scheme of the main amplifier co-pumped with the C-band auxiliary laser and 915 nm LD.

FIG. 3.

Energy level scheme of the main amplifier co-pumped with the C-band auxiliary laser and 915 nm LD.

Close modal

In the LMA main amplifier, we first used an ∼5 m LMA gain fiber. Three wavelengths were chosen as the C-band auxiliary lasers: 1530, 1550, and 1560 nm. Since the amplified 1.6 μm laser has a lower gain coefficient than the auxiliary laser, the 1.6 μm injection laser should have a high power to provide a dominant position when competing with the auxiliary laser for gain. The laser power injected into the LMA main amplifier was ∼2.2 W. The spectra of the 1530, 1540, 1550, and 1560 nm auxiliary lasers are shown in the insets of Figs. 1(c)1(f), respectively. Figure 4(a) shows the output power from the LMA amplifier without the auxiliary C-band laser. The maximum output power is ∼7.52 W when the 915 nm pump power is ∼35 W. The slope efficiency is ∼18.12%, but the power increase is slightly non-linear.

FIG. 4.

(a) Output power after the main amplifier without the co-pumping of the auxiliary C-band laser and (b) spectra of the main amplifier when the 915 nm pump power is 0 and 35 W.

FIG. 4.

(a) Output power after the main amplifier without the co-pumping of the auxiliary C-band laser and (b) spectra of the main amplifier when the 915 nm pump power is 0 and 35 W.

Close modal

As shown in Fig. 4(b), no C-band ASE is observed, and the residual 915 nm pump can be ignored.

Figure 5(a) shows the output power of the main amplifier with the seeding of the 1530, 1550, and 1560 nm auxiliary lasers with the same power of ∼167 mW. After seeding these auxiliary lasers, the output power increases from the original 7.52 to ∼8.56, ∼8.75, and ∼8.47 W, respectively. The corresponding slope efficiencies are ∼20.7%, ∼21.5%, and ∼19.97%. Figures 5(b)5(d) show the amplified spectra for seeding with different auxiliary laser wavelengths. The EDF has the highest absorption at ∼1530 nm; therefore, the 1530 nm auxiliary laser would be rapidly consumed when it propagates through the gain fiber with the high power 1.6 μm laser. Thus, the 1530 nm auxiliary laser is almost entirely absorbed by the gain fiber, as shown in Fig. 5(b). The C-band ASE in Fig. 5(b) is mainly coming from the initial ∼169.7 mW 1530 nm auxiliary laser [Fig. 1(c)] and is then amplified using the LMA gain fiber. Since the C-band ASE is mainly concentrated in the 1560–1570 nm region, which cannot be absorbed fully by the gain fiber, the energy associated with this portion does not participate in amplifying the 1.6 μm laser. Fortunately, the amplified C-band ASE is still much lower than the 1.6 μm component, so it can be ignored. For seeding the 1550 nm auxiliary laser, the intensity ratio is over 25 dB between the 1550 nm auxiliary laser and the 1.6 μm laser, as shown in Fig. 5(d). The maximum output power of ∼9.42 W is achieved by using 1550 nm as the auxiliary laser wavelength. Since the EDF has a lower absorption (but the maximum net gain) at 1560 nm, the main process that the 1560 nm auxiliary laser undergoes is amplification rather than absorption. Thus, the final amplified spectrum of the 1.6 μm laser contains a significant residual amplified 1560 nm component, as shown in Fig. 5(c).

FIG. 5.

(a) Output power of the main amplifier with different co-pumping levels of the auxiliary C-band laser and (b)–(d) spectra of the main amplifier when the auxiliary C-band laser wavelength is 1530, 1560, and 1550 nm, respectively.

FIG. 5.

(a) Output power of the main amplifier with different co-pumping levels of the auxiliary C-band laser and (b)–(d) spectra of the main amplifier when the auxiliary C-band laser wavelength is 1530, 1560, and 1550 nm, respectively.

Close modal

As shown in Fig. 5, the 1530 nm and 1550 nm auxiliary laser wavelengths have better outcomes. In Figs. 6(a) and 6(b), we further investigate the 1530 and 1550 nm auxiliary laser powers seeded into the LMA amplifier. When seeding the ∼399 mW 1530 nm laser, the output power can reach 8.67 W with a slope efficiency of ∼21.25%, while seeding the ∼500 mw 1550 nm laser, the maximum output power can reach 9.42 W and the slope efficiency is up to ∼23.23%. As shown by the spectra in Fig. 6(c), the 1.6 μm laser component is still much higher (>20 dB) than the residual 1550 nm auxiliary laser. The highly chirped 9.42 W, 1.6 μm laser is compressed using a free-space grating pair. The achieved narrowest pulse duration is ∼361 fs. The whole compression efficiency is ∼77%; the laser power after the compressor is ∼7.25 W, corresponding to a 201 nJ pulse energy and a 557 kW peak power. The long-term power stability over 2 h is shown in Fig. 6(e). The root mean square (RMS) of the power fluctuation is ∼0.98%. The ASE in the 1530 nm auxiliary laser is the main factor resulting in a lower amplifier power compared with the 1550 nm auxiliary laser. The intrinsic mechanism of the C-band auxiliary laser pumping is that the auxiliary laser is amplified first to provide enough pump power for the 1.6 μm laser and is then absorbed by the long gain fiber to increase the 1.6 μm laser power. The 1530 nm is not the strongest emission of the EDF, so it cannot get sufficient power amplification. In the amplification process, most pump power contributes to the 1560–1570 nm ASE carried using the initial 1530 nm auxiliary laser. Due to the large ps-scale pulse duration and the use of the LMA gain fiber, the nonlinearity in the amplification is controlled well and no obvious broadening occurs on the amplified spectrum.

FIG. 6.

(a) Output power with different powers for the co-pumping of a 1530 nm auxiliary laser; (b) output power with different powers for the co-pumping of a 1550 nm auxiliary laser; (c) spectra of the output with a 500 mW, 1550 nm auxiliary laser when the 915 nm pump power is 35 and 0 W; (d) compressed pulse duration for (c) with the 35 W, 915 nm pump power; and (e) long-term power stability.

FIG. 6.

(a) Output power with different powers for the co-pumping of a 1530 nm auxiliary laser; (b) output power with different powers for the co-pumping of a 1550 nm auxiliary laser; (c) spectra of the output with a 500 mW, 1550 nm auxiliary laser when the 915 nm pump power is 35 and 0 W; (d) compressed pulse duration for (c) with the 35 W, 915 nm pump power; and (e) long-term power stability.

Close modal

For typical ultrafast laser amplification, a short gain fiber is required to avoid the severe nonlinearity. Thus, we decreased the LMA gain fiber length to ∼3 m. A shorter gain fiber means a lower absorption at 1550 and 1560 nm. Thus, for the 3 m LMA amplifier, we used 1530 and 1540 nm as the auxiliary laser wavelengths. After seeding the ∼274.5 mW 1540 nm auxiliary laser [Fig. 1(d)] and the ∼402 mW 1530 nm auxiliary laser, the output power increased to ∼9.3 and ∼9.2 W, respectively. The corresponding slope efficiencies are ∼22.606% and ∼21.939%, as shown in Fig. 7(a). Since the absorption decreases with decreasing gain fiber length, the residual auxiliary laser and the residual pump power are higher than those from the ∼5 m LMA gain fiber. For this situation, seeding the 1530 nm auxiliary laser is better than seeding the 1540 nm auxiliary laser. The 1.6 μm laser component is more than 20 dB higher than the residual 1530 nm auxiliary laser and the ASE, while it is only ∼17.554 dB higher when using the 1540 nm as the auxiliary laser wavelength. Both the output power and the slope efficiency achieved in the shorter main amplifier are lower than in the ∼5 m main amplifier, but a shorter main amplifier is more suitable for further enhancing the ultrafast power beyond 10 W because a shorter gain fiber means a lower nonlinearity.

FIG. 7.

Case for a shorter length (∼3 m) of the LMA gain fiber. (a) Output power of the main amplifier with the co-pumping of the ∼274.5 mW 1540 nm or 402 mW 1530 nm auxiliary laser; (b) spectra of the main amplifier when the 915 nm pump power is 0 and 35 W; and (c)–(d) spectra of the main amplifier co-pumped with 1540 and 1530 nm auxiliary lasers.

FIG. 7.

Case for a shorter length (∼3 m) of the LMA gain fiber. (a) Output power of the main amplifier with the co-pumping of the ∼274.5 mW 1540 nm or 402 mW 1530 nm auxiliary laser; (b) spectra of the main amplifier when the 915 nm pump power is 0 and 35 W; and (c)–(d) spectra of the main amplifier co-pumped with 1540 and 1530 nm auxiliary lasers.

Close modal

A comparison of the previously reported high power 1.6 μm lasers is shown in Table I. One can see that this work demonstrates the highest power 1.6 μm laser by using an all-fiber CPA system and an auxiliary C-band laser co-pumping scheme. In the actual experiment, the power saturation is not observed, indicating that the output power can be further increased by using a higher pump power. If a higher pump power is used, the laser power can be expected to be greater than 30 W. Adopting the gain fiber with a larger mode area, the C-band laser co-pumping scheme has potential to achieve tens or even hundreds of watts. With the development of an S-band laser, whether as an auxiliary laser or as a sole pump source, a high power 1530 nm laser will be the optimal choice for generating a higher power 1.6 μm ultrafast laser.

TABLE I.

Comparison of the high power 1.6 μm lasers.

Output power/WPulse duration (ps)Pulse energy (nJ)StructureReferences
∼0.46 ∼0.605 ∼1500 Free-space coupling 19  
∼0.13 ∼0.155 ∼14 All-fiber 20  
∼1 ∼50 ∼40 All-fiber 21  
∼9.42 ∼0.361 ∼262 All-fiber This work 
Output power/WPulse duration (ps)Pulse energy (nJ)StructureReferences
∼0.46 ∼0.605 ∼1500 Free-space coupling 19  
∼0.13 ∼0.155 ∼14 All-fiber 20  
∼1 ∼50 ∼40 All-fiber 21  
∼9.42 ∼0.361 ∼262 All-fiber This work 

In conclusion, we designed a hybrid amplifier consisting of a double-pass amplifier and a C-band laser assisted LMA main amplifier for amplifying a weak 1.6 μm ultrafast laser to several watts. In the ∼5 m LMA amplifier, the best auxiliary laser wavelength is 1550 nm, the maximum output power can reach ∼9.42 W, and the slope efficiency is ∼23.26%. The high power 1.6 μm ultrafast laser has a large ps-scale duration, which is further compressed to ∼361 fs after passing a free-space grating pair. For the 3 m short LMA amplifier, by optimizing the auxiliary laser wavelength (using the 1530 nm and 1540 nm lasers as the auxiliary lasers), the maximum output power is ∼9.30 W, corresponding to a slope efficiency of ∼22.606%. Our work provides a new perspective for obtaining an ultra-high power fs 1.6 μm all-fiber laser for, , for example, deep imaging of biological tissues.

We acknowledge the financial support provided by the “Pioneer” and “Leading Goose” R&D Program of Zhejiang Province (Grant No. 2023C03083), in part by the National Key Research and Development Program of China (Grant No. 2022YFC3601003), in part by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. W2412107, 91833303, and 11621101), in part by the Ningbo Science and Technology Project (Project Nos. 2023Z179, 2021Z030, and 2018B10093), and in part by the Ningbo Public Welfare Research Program (Project No. 2024Z234). The authors are also grateful to Dr. Julian Evans of Zhejiang University for a helpful discussion.

The authors have no conflicts to disclose.

Haolin Yang: Data curation (equal); Investigation (equal); Methodology (equal); Visualization (equal); Writing – original draft (equal); Writing – review & editing (equal). Ruili Zhang: Funding acquisition (supporting). Sailing He: Funding acquisition (equal); Investigation (equal); Methodology (equal); Supervision (lead); Writing – review & editing (equal).

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

1.
N. G.
Horton
,
K.
Wang
,
D.
Kobat
,
C. G.
Clark
,
F. W.
Wise
,
C. B.
Schaffer
, and
C.
Xu
, “
In vivo three-photon microscopy of subcortical structures within an intact mouse brain
,”
Nat. Photonics
7
,
205
209
(
2013
).
2.
L. A.
Sordillo
,
Y.
Pu
,
S.
Pratavieira
,
Y.
Budansky
, and
R. R.
Alfano
, “
Deep optical imaging of tissue using the second and third near-infrared spectral windows
,”
J. Biomed. Opt.
19
,
056004
(
2014
).
3.
S. D.
Agger
and
J. H.
Povlsen
, “
Emission and absorption cross section of thulium doped silica fibers
,”
Opt. Express
14
,
50
57
(
2006
).
4.
W. L.
Barnes
,
R. I.
Laming
,
E. J.
Tarbox
, and
P. R.
Morkel
, “
Absorption and emission cross section of Er3+ doped silica fibers
,”
IEEE J. Quantum Electron.
27
,
1004
1010
(
1991
).
5.
L.
He
,
Y.
Chen
,
X.
Yin
,
Z.
Gu
,
S.
Liu
,
W.
Li
,
Y.
Xing
,
Y.
Chu
,
N.
Dai
, and
J.
Li
, “
High-efficiency cladding-pumped Er/Yb co-doped alumino-phosphosilicate fiber for an extended L-band amplification
,”
Opt. Lett.
49
,
61
64
(
2024
).
6.
S.
Jalilpiran
,
J.
Lefebvre
,
N.
Grégoire
,
Y.
Messaddeq
, and
S.
LaRochelle
, “
Improving extended l-band fiber amplifiers using Er3+: Y3+ Co-doped silicate with optimized alumino-phospho-silicate glass matrix
,”
J. Lightwave Technol.
42
,
3835
3843
(
2024
).
7.
Z.
Zhai
and
J. K.
Sahu
, “
1480 nm diode-pumped Er3+: Yb3+ co-doped phospho-alumino-silicate fiber for extending the l-band gain up to 1625 nm
,”
J. Lightwave Technol.
41
,
3432
3437
(
2023
).
8.
C.
Lei
,
H.
Feng
,
Y.
Messaddeq
, and
S.
LaRochelle
, “
Investigation of Bi-directionally, dual-wavelength pumped extended L-band EDFAs
,”
IEEE Photonics Technol. Lett.
32
,
1227
1230
(
2020
).
9.
C.
Yang
,
X.
Guan
,
Q.
Zhao
,
W.
Lin
,
C.
Li
,
J.
Gan
,
Q.
Qian
,
Z.
Feng
,
Z.
Yang
, and
S.
Xu
, “
15 W high OSNR kHz-linewidth linearly-polarized all-fiber single-frequency MOPA at 16 μm
,”
Opt. Express
26
,
12863
12869
(
2018
).
10.
X.
Guan
,
Q.
Zhao
,
W.
Lin
,
T.
Tan
,
C.
Yang
,
P.
Ma
,
Z.
Yang
, and
S.
Xu
, “
High-efficiency and high-power single-frequency fiber laser at 1.6 μm based on cascaded energy-transfer pumping
,”
Photonics Res.
8
,
414
420
(
2020
).
11.
M. A.
Mahdi
,
F. R.
Mahamd Adikan
,
P.
Poopalan
,
S.
Selvakennedy
,
W. Y.
Chan
, and
H.
Ahmad
, “
Long-wavelength EDFA gain enhancement through 1550 nm band signal injection
,”
Opt. Commun.
176
,
125
129
(
2000
).
12.
Y.
Zhang
,
X.
Liu
,
J.
Peng
,
X.
Feng
, and
W.
Zhang
, “
Wavelength and power dependence of injected c-band laser on pump conversion efficiency of L-band EDFA
,”
IEEE Photonics Technol. Lett.
14
,
290
292
(
2002
).
13.
B. H.
Choi
,
H. H.
Park
,
M.
Chu
, and
S. K.
Kim
, “
High-gain coefficient long-wavelength-band erbium-doped fiber amplifier using 1530-nm band pump
,”
IEEE Photonics Technol. Lett.
13
,
109
111
(
2001
).
14.
C.
Lei
,
H.
Feng
,
Y.
Messaddeq
, and
S.
LaRochelle
, “
Investigation of C-band pumping for extended L-band EDFAs
,”
J. Opt. Soc. Am. B
37
,
2345
2352
(
2020
).
15.
W.
Yu
,
Q.
Xiao
,
L.
Wang
,
Y.
Zhao
,
T.
Qi
,
P.
Yan
, and
M.
Gong
, “
219.6 W large-mode-area Er:Yb codoped fiber amplifier operating at 1600  nm pumped by 1018  nm fiber lasers
,”
Opt. Lett.
46
,
2192
2195
(
2021
).
16.
L.
He
,
Q.
Qiu
,
X.
Yin
,
Z.
Gu
,
S.
Liu
,
W.
Li
,
Y.
Xing
,
Y.
Chu
,
N.
Dai
, and
J.
Li
, “
Extended L-band 4-Core Er/Yb co-doped fiber amplifier based on 1018 nm cladding pumping
,”
Opt. Express
31
,
25557
25569
(
2023
).
17.
W.
Yu
,
P.
Yan
,
Q.
Xiao
,
T.
Qi
,
D.
Li
, and
M.
Gong
, “
Power scalability of a continuous-wave high-power Er–Yb co-doped fiber amplifier pumped by Yb-doped fiber lasers
,”
Appl. Opt.
60
,
2046
2055
(
2021
).
18.
H.
Chen
,
H.
Huang
,
S.
Wang
, and
D.
Shen
, “
A high-peak-power orthogonally-polarized multi-wavelength laser at 16–17 µm based on the cascaded nonlinear optical frequency conversion
,”
Opt. Express
27
,
24857
24865
(
2019
).
19.
F.
Morin
,
F.
Druon
,
M.
Hanna
, and
P.
Georges
, “
Microjoule femtosecond fiber laser at 16 μm for corneal surgery applications
,”
Opt. Lett.
34
,
1991
1993
(
2009
).
20.
J.
Kang
,
C.
Kong
,
P.
Feng
,
X.
Wei
,
Z. C.
Luo
,
E. Y.
Lam
, and
K. K. Y.
Wong
, “
Broadband high-energy all-fiber laser at 1.6 μm
,”
IEEE Photonics Technol. Lett.
30
,
311
314
(
2018
).
21.
H.
Yang
and
S.
He
, “
Watt-level 1.6 μm dissipative soliton ultrafast laser and external generation of ∼70 fs noise-like pulses for supercontinuum generation
,”
Infrared Phys. Technol.
134
,
104872
(
2023
).