We report 100% duty cycle generation of sub-MHz single photon pairs at the rubidium D1 line using cavity-enhanced spontaneous parametric downconversion. The temporal intensity cross correlation function exhibits a bandwidth of 666 ± 16 kHz for the single photons, an order of magnitude below the natural linewidth of the target transition. A half-wave plate inside our cavity helps to achieve triple resonance between pump, signal, and idler photon, reducing the bandwidth and simplifying the locking scheme. Additionally, stabilisation of the cavity to the pump frequency enables the 100% duty cycle. The quantum nature of the source is confirmed by the idler-triggered second-order autocorrelation function at τ = 0 to be g s , s ( 2 ) ( 0 ) =  0.016 ± 0.002 for a heralding rate of 5 kHz. The generated photons are well-suited for storage in quantum memory schemes with sub-natural linewidths, such as gradient echo memories.

Quantum technologies are primed to revolutionise information processing, with large companies already investing in basic quantum computing devices. While these potentially offer local computational enhancement, distributing quantum information will also require dedicated quantum networks designed to faithfully transmit quantum bits (qubit).1 Photons are the natural choice for information carriers due to their high mobility and low interaction with the environment. Overcoming the inevitable transmission losses in such networks demands repeater nodes with entanglement swapping operations.2–5 The absence of high fidelity entangling gates in linear optical quantum computing (LOQC) and true on-demand sources means that the repeater node will also require noiseless amplification as well as a memory to hold the photonic qubit. As photons are notoriously difficult to store locally, the transfer of the qubit from the photonic state to a locally storable qubit, such as atoms,6,7 ions,8 nitrogen-vacancy centres in diamonds,9 or rare-earth doped solids,10,11 is essential. For this kind of hybridisation, the spectral properties of the photons and the chosen transition of the storage qubit need to be matched. As the spectral properties of the memories are limited in their tunability, the single photon source needs to be engineered to match the wavelength and the bandwidth of the atomic transition.

Suitable photons can be generated through four-wave mixing in a magneto-optical trap;12,13 however, this requires substantial experimental effort, and the duty cycles are low. Alternatively, spontaneous parametric downconversion (SPDC)14 produces high-purity heralded single photons at flexible wavelengths. SPDC-based sources have demonstrated near ideal heralded second-order autocorrelation function g s , s ( 2 ) ( 0 )  0.01 , far below the classical limit15–18 of 1. However, the spontaneous nature of the downconversion process combined with energy conservation and phase matching conditions results in a frequency spectrum typically on the order of 100s of GHz up to THz, several orders-of-magnitude larger than the bandwidths of atomic transitions. This can be compensated either by spectral filtering,19–21 which severely reduces the available brightness, or by using an optical cavity to enhance the probability of creating the photons in the spectral and spatial resonator mode.22–29 

One of the most promising candidates for quantum memories to date is the gradient echo memory (GEM),30–34 with recall fidelities7 of up to 98% and coherence times of up to 195 μ s in rubidium33 and even longer storage times in rare earth ion crystals.35 To achieve these high fidelities and storage times in GEM, the spectral bandwidth of the photons needs to be well below the natural linewidth, e.g., sub-MHz for a GEM using rubidium as the natural linewidth is 5.8 MHz. Previous cavity-based SPDC sources have achieved bandwidths comparable to atomic linewidths, but divide their operation time into stabilisation and photon production phases, resulting in typical duty cycles < 50 %. Fekete et al. reported the so far narrowest photons from SPDC—around 2 MHz,28 still unsuitable for efficient GEM in rubidium—and only one source has demonstrated 100% duty cycle,25 referring to the capability of the source to probabilistically produce single photon pairs at any given time.

Here we report on a triply resonant sub-megahertz source of orthogonally polarised single photon pairs with a 100% duty cycle. The photons are created via cavity-enhanced SPDC at the 795 nm Rb wavelength, with bandwidths for signal and idler of 666 ±  16 and 667 ±  15 kHz, both matching the D1 line in Rb used in GEM. The obtained g s , s ( 2 ) ( 0 ) =  0.016 ± 0.002 at 5 kHz heralding rate is 500 standard deviations below the classical limit, strongly indicating the quantum character of the source.

Generating photons resonant to atomic transitions requires the length of the SPDC cavity to be locked to an absolute frequency reference. Previous sources commonly achieved this during the feedback part of a cycle by stabilising the cavity to a laser beam on resonance with the atomic ensemble. As the reference beam is at the target frequency, no single photons can be observed during this phase. For the remainder of the cycle, the cavity is not actively stabilised and only the pump light is present, generating resonant single photon pairs. This procedure reduces the duty cycle to well below 100%. Our system overcomes this issue by stabilising the SPDC cavity to the pump light, which itself is referenced back to the targeted Rb transition, as explained in detail below.

The schematic experimental setup is shown in Fig. 1. The starting point is a continuous-wave amplified diode laser (Toptica TA Pro) emitting laser light at 795 nm (subscript r for red) through two output ports. The light from the master port is modulated by a 1.25 MHz RF signal with small modulation depth in an electro-optic modulator (EOM1) and enters a rubidium cell (TEM CoSy), where Doppler-free spectroscopy is performed. The optimal signal to noise ratio for modulation was empirically found at 1.25 MHz, limited by the detection bandwidth of the CoSy cell. The modulation is used to derive an error signal via the Pound-Drever-Hall (PDH) technique.36,37 This is a standard technique for stabilising laser systems and is utilised for all frequency locks in the experiment. The output of the amplified slave port is modulated at 12.5 MHz (EOM2), which is clearly higher than the cavity bandwidth, but not too high as the sideband modulation gets less efficient and the lock becomes less precise, and then coupled into the cavity for second-harmonic generation (SHG). The cavity enhances the efficiency of the frequency doubling inside a 20 mm long periodically poled potassium titanyl phosphate (ppKTP) crystal to 38%, and the created laser light at 397.5 nm (subscript b for blue) is subsequently pumping the downconversion. The free spectral range (FSR) of the cavity is F S R r , S H G 278 MHz with a finesse of F r , S H G 100 (for detailed numbers including uncertainties see the supplementary material). The laser system is stabilised to the error signal, derived from the SHG cavity reflection on PD1 (home-made fast photodiode), using the PDH technique. The feedback loop simultaneously adjusts the current driving the laser diode and the position of a grating reflecting some laser light back into the diode, cancelling out high frequency noise. To compensate for long-term drifts, the length of the SHG cavity is stabilised to the rubidium D1 transition at 795 nm via a mirror mounted on a piezo-electric transducer. After leaving the SHG cavity, the remaining red light is separated from the blue pump light by a dichroic mirror (DM), with the cavity resonance being monitored at PD2. The pump light is modulated at 12.175 MHz (EOM3) to prevent beating with the formerly applied 12.5 MHz and coupled into the downconversion cavity.

FIG. 1.

(a) Schematic experimental setup. Rb, rubidium spectroscopy cell; EOM1,2,3, electro-optic modulators; PD1,2,3, photodiodes; SHG, second-harmonic generation; ppKTP, non-linear crystal; z , piezo-electric transducer; DM, dichroic mirror; SPDC, spontaneous parametric downconversion; HWP, half-wave plate; PBS, polarising beamsplitter; SPD1,2,3, single photon detectors. The laser is stabilised to the SHG cavity which itself is stabilised to the Rb D1 transition for absolute frequency stability. The generated light at 397.5 nm is separated from 795 nm light at a DM and pumping the type-II SPDC cavity. Finally the single photons are split on a PBS and fibre-coupled for further processing. (b) Variation of the single photon detection for g s , s ( 2 ) ( 0 ) measurement. The transmitted output of the PBS is split in a 50/50 fibre beamsplitter and both output ports are detected separately on SPD2 and SPD3.

FIG. 1.

(a) Schematic experimental setup. Rb, rubidium spectroscopy cell; EOM1,2,3, electro-optic modulators; PD1,2,3, photodiodes; SHG, second-harmonic generation; ppKTP, non-linear crystal; z , piezo-electric transducer; DM, dichroic mirror; SPDC, spontaneous parametric downconversion; HWP, half-wave plate; PBS, polarising beamsplitter; SPD1,2,3, single photon detectors. The laser is stabilised to the SHG cavity which itself is stabilised to the Rb D1 transition for absolute frequency stability. The generated light at 397.5 nm is separated from 795 nm light at a DM and pumping the type-II SPDC cavity. Finally the single photons are split on a PBS and fibre-coupled for further processing. (b) Variation of the single photon detection for g s , s ( 2 ) ( 0 ) measurement. The transmitted output of the PBS is split in a 50/50 fibre beamsplitter and both output ports are detected separately on SPD2 and SPD3.

Close modal

The SPDC process takes place in a dual anti-reflective coated 25 mm long ppKTP crystal (coating Layertec, crystal Raicol) with a poling period of 8.8 μ m , cut for type-II quasi-phase-matching. The crystal is placed in a copper mount that is temperature controlled with a stability of Δ T < ± 1.5 mK. The bow-tie cavity surrounding the crystal is designed following Refs. 38 and 39 and mounted on a monolith of Invar to increase stability. The cavity consists of three high-reflecting mirrors plus one partially reflecting outcoupling/incoupling mirror at 795 nm/397.5 nm (all Layertec, see the supplementary material). The half-wave plate (HWP) inside the cavity rotates the polarisation of the single photons by 90° every physical round-trip but leaves the pump light unaffected. This “flip-trick” effectively doubles the cavity length for the single photons, reducing their free spectral range to F S R r 121 MHz compared with F S R b 241 MHz. It also cancels out any birefringence between the orthogonally polarised single photons, as on average the number of round-trips travelled in each polarization is the same. Thereby the flip-trick alleviates the need for a compensation crystal,23,25,29 reducing the overall loss and achieving finesses of F r 181 and F b 8.5 .

In order to achieve enhanced emission into the desired mode while simultaneously maintaining a 100% duty cycle of the source, the cavity needs to be kept triply resonant. To ensure this, a complex active stabilisation circuit for signal, idler, and pump photons has been implemented. The first step uses a signal derived from PD3 to stabilise the length of the cavity to the pump frequency via a mirror mounted on a piezo-electric transducer. Second, the flip-trick always ensures double resonance of signal and idler, as it eliminates birefringence of the single photons. Temperature tuning the ppKTP crystal allows to fulfil the phase-matching condition for SPDC while simultaneously achieving triple resonance at temperatures of around T 41.3 ° C with a F W H M 10 mK. Conventionally, the FSR of a cavity is independent of the frequency of the light field, resulting in twice the number of resonances for every second harmonic frequency (pump) compared with its fundamental (single photons). Locking to an unmatched resonance would yield no useful single photons. The flip-trick compensates for this as well by effectively doubling the cavity length only for the fundamental frequency, ensuring every resonance of the pump is matched with one for the single photons.

After leaving the cavity, a dichroic mirror and an ultra-narrow bandpass filter at 795 nm (FWHM 1.0 nm) separate the down-converted photons from the leaking pump light. A polarising beamsplitter (PBS) deterministically splits the paired photons, which are then separately coupled into single mode fibres, detected on single photon detectors (Perkin Elmer SPCM-AQR-14-FC)—SPD1 for idler, SPD2 for signal—and recorded with a time-tagging module (Roithner Lasertechnik, 100.1 ps time resolution). In the g s , s ( 2 ) ( 0 ) measurement (Fig. 1, case B), the signal fibre is sent through an additional 50/50 fibre beamsplitter before both outputs are detected on SPD2 and SPD3. The self-relocking optical stabilisation loops for the laser frequency, the SHG, and the PDC cavity lengths commonly allow continuous data acquisition for 90 min and regularly reach up to half a day.

The characterisation of the source’s linewidth is performed by measuring the temporal intensity cross correlation function G s , i ( 2 ) ( τ ) between signal and idler photon (Fig. 1, case A). The cross correlation function is given by25,40
(1)
where k { S , I } , E k ( ± ) are the electric field operators, γ k is the cavity damping rate, ω k is the single photon frequency, Γ k = γ k 2 + i m k F S R r , k , m k , and F S R r , k is the free spectral range. τ 0 corresponds to the temporal width of the peaks, accounting for the propagation delay between signal and idler in the crystal.

Fig. 2 shows measurements of G s , i ( 2 ) ( τ ) for four different angular configurations of the HWP without background correction. The comb-like structure arises from the increased probability of detecting signal and idler photons at integer multiples of their effective round-trip time, t r t = 1 / F S R r , k = 8.28 ns, equaling two physical round-trips. At perfect alignment (Fig. 2(a)), the HWP rotates horizontal to vertical polarisation and vice versa at each pass. Therefore, the photon mode inside the cavity does not overlap with itself one physical round-trip earlier. It has to traverse the cavity a second time to complete an effective round-trip and get detected with its partner as a coincidence on the SPDs. This halves the FSR and thus reduces the photon bandwidth. Additionally, it ensures double resonance of signal and idler photons by cancelling the birefringence of the ppKTP crystal. Slight misalignment of the HWP angle results in a non-zero probability for the photons to be detected as coincidences after an odd number of physical round-trip differences. This can be seen in the cross correlation functions (Fig. 2) as peaks with half the temporal spacing, which reach their maximum when the round-trip difference between the signal and idler photons is an integer multiple of 45 ° Δ α . Thus changing Δ α from 0° to 45° (optical axis of HWP) allows one to set F S R r , 0 121 MHz and F S R r , 45 242 MHz.

FIG. 2.

(a)–(d) Evolution of the normalised temporal intensity cross correlation function G s , i ( 2 ) ( τ ) as the HWP is detuned from the optimum by (a) Δ α = 0°, (b) 2 / 3°, (c) 4 / 3°, and (d) 2°. This detuning reveals an additional cavity with half the temporal spacing, with its maximum around (b) τ > ± 150 ns, (c) τ ± 140 ns, and (d) τ ± 90 ns. The average pump power is 20 μ W with fluctuations <5% and the total coincidence counts are 35 000 within a ± 150 ns window for all four measurements.

FIG. 2.

(a)–(d) Evolution of the normalised temporal intensity cross correlation function G s , i ( 2 ) ( τ ) as the HWP is detuned from the optimum by (a) Δ α = 0°, (b) 2 / 3°, (c) 4 / 3°, and (d) 2°. This detuning reveals an additional cavity with half the temporal spacing, with its maximum around (b) τ > ± 150 ns, (c) τ ± 140 ns, and (d) τ ± 90 ns. The average pump power is 20 μ W with fluctuations <5% and the total coincidence counts are 35 000 within a ± 150 ns window for all four measurements.

Close modal

In case of perfect alignment of the HWP, fitting a double exponential decay exp ( 2 π Δ ν τ ) can be used to extract the bandwidth Δ ν of the single photons, as shown in Fig. 3(a). The FWHM correlation time of 331 ns and the corresponding bandwidths of Δ ν S = 666 ± 16 kHz and Δ ν I = 667 ± 15 kHz are, to our knowledge, the narrowest values observed from SPDC to date. The source therefore meets the spectral requirements for efficient coupling with the D1 transition in rubidium in GEM, making the photons suitable carries for quantum information between memories. The slight difference between signal and idler bandwidth is within error of the fit. Fig. 3(b) shows a zoom into delay times of ± 200 μ s around zero delay with a finer resolution of 200.2 ps/time bin. The fit of Eq. (1) is in excellent agreement with the data. The finesse of F r 181 corresponds to internal losses of 3.4% per effective round-trip, leading to an escape efficiency41 of ∼0.29.

FIG. 3.

Temporal intensity cross correlation function G s , i ( 2 ) ( τ ) of the source for perfect HWP alignment. Data in red, theoretical model in black. (a) Time bin size of 8.2 ns chosen to be close to one effective round-trip time. Linewidths of signal and idler are derived from the double exponential decay to be 666 ± 16 and 667 ± 15 kHz. Overall counts are 312 000 within a ± 1 μ s window and an integration time of 11 min. (b) Zoom into the detailed structure with the peaks normalised to the main peak at zero delay. Time bin size is 200.2 ps. Average pump power over the measurement is 20 μ W with fluctuations <5%.

FIG. 3.

Temporal intensity cross correlation function G s , i ( 2 ) ( τ ) of the source for perfect HWP alignment. Data in red, theoretical model in black. (a) Time bin size of 8.2 ns chosen to be close to one effective round-trip time. Linewidths of signal and idler are derived from the double exponential decay to be 666 ± 16 and 667 ± 15 kHz. Overall counts are 312 000 within a ± 1 μ s window and an integration time of 11 min. (b) Zoom into the detailed structure with the peaks normalised to the main peak at zero delay. Time bin size is 200.2 ps. Average pump power over the measurement is 20 μ W with fluctuations <5%.

Close modal
The figure of merit to quantify the quality of the single photon source is the idler-triggered second-order autocorrelation function g s , s ( 2 ) ( τ ) at τ = 0 (Fig. 1, case B). g s , s ( 2 ) ( τ ) describes the situation where an idler and a signal photon are detected at time t = 0 with a second signal photon at t = τ and is defined as17,25,40
(2)
where ES is the operator for the signal field. Following Refs. 15, 17, and 18, g s , s ( 2 ) ( 0 ) can be rewritten as
(3)
for small windows [ τ c / 2 , τ c / 2 ] around τ = 0 . Here, N1 is the number of idler events at SPD1, N123 are triple coincidences between SPD1,2,3, and N12,13 are the coincidences between SPD1,2 or SPD1,3 inside the time window τ c , respectively.

Experimentally, this is realised by opening a coincidence window of width τ c = 250 ns (∼FWHM of the decay in Fig. 3(a)) symmetrically around the detection of an idler photon and measuring events on either signal detector to determine N12,13, while events on both signal detectors are added up to N123. The latter case are unwanted events indicating the creation of more than one photon pair and should be suppressed for an ideal source. As the arrival time differences of the photon pairs are very well known (Fig. 3(b)), we post-selected the measured data to 1 ns (∼FWHM of each peak) around the peak maxima for each trt, leading to an effective τ c = 33 ns. Fig. 4 shows the dependence of g s , s ( 2 ) ( 0 ) on the idler (heralding) rate R1 = N 1 / T , where T is the overall measurement time. Each data point contains 200 million idler events and is not corrected for dark counts which would reduce g s , s ( 2 ) ( 0 ) even further. Antibunching below 0.542 is achieved up to R1 = 250 kHz, with a minimum measured value of g s , s ( 2 ) ( 0 ) =  0.016 ± 0.002 for a idler rate of 5 kHz, giving clear proof of the quantum character of the single photon source.

FIG. 4.

Idler-triggered second-order autocorrelation function g s , s ( 2 ) ( 0 ) dependent on the heralding rate R1, red line as a guide for the eye. Each point consists of 200 million trigger events and is not dark count corrected. Antibunching below 0.5 is observed up to heralding rates of 250 kHz with a minimum measured g s , s ( 2 ) ( 0 ) =  0.016 at 5 kHz.

FIG. 4.

Idler-triggered second-order autocorrelation function g s , s ( 2 ) ( 0 ) dependent on the heralding rate R1, red line as a guide for the eye. Each point consists of 200 million trigger events and is not dark count corrected. Antibunching below 0.5 is observed up to heralding rates of 250 kHz with a minimum measured g s , s ( 2 ) ( 0 ) =  0.016 at 5 kHz.

Close modal

In conclusion, we report on the first sub-MHz cavity-enhanced single photon source, resonant with the D1 transition in rubidium. The linewidth of 666 kHz is the narrowest from SPDC to date, matching the spectral requirements of GEM—currently the most efficient quantum memory. The ultra-narrow bandwidth is achieved by introducing a new method, the flip-trick, which also cancels out birefringence between orthogonally polarised single photons. Antibunching as low as g s , s ( 2 ) ( 0 ) = 0.016 confirms the single photon nature of our source. Average locking times of several hours are achieved and stabilising the cavity to the pump light enables a 100% duty cycle. The next step will be to filter a single cavity mode by using either active spectral filtering by an external cavity or, internally, the clustering effect27,28 or an etalon. Additionally, the whole setup fits on two small breadboards, which are easy to transport, and we are planning on combining our source with the GEM developed at the Australian National University to gain further insight into the memory’s performance at a single photon level.

See the supplementary material for further details and specifications on both cavities and a full characterisation of the HWP.

This work was partially supported by the Centre for Quantum Computation and Communication Technology (Grant No. CE110001027) and by the Centre for Engineered Quantum Systems (Grant No. CE110001013). A.G.W. acknowledges support from a UQ Vice-Chancellor’s Research and Teaching Fellowship. The authors thank the team from the Austrian Institute of Technology and Roithner Lasertechnik for kindly providing time-tagging modules.

1.
H. J.
Kimble
, “
The quantum internet
,”
Nature
453
,
1023
1030
(
2008
).
2.
L. M.
Duan
,
M. D.
Lukin
,
J. I.
Cirac
, and
P.
Zoller
, “
Long-distance quantum communication with atomic ensembles and linear optics
,”
Nature
414
,
413
418
(
2001
).
3.
C.
Simon
,
H.
de Riedmatten
,
M.
Afzelius
,
N.
Sangouard
,
H.
Zbinden
, and
N.
Gisin
, “
Quantum repeaters with photon pair sources and multimode memories
,”
Phys. Rev. Lett.
98
,
190503
(
2007
).
4.
K. S.
Choi
,
H.
Deng
,
J.
Laurat
, and
H. J.
Kimble
, “
Mapping photonic entanglement into and out of a quantum memory
,”
Nature
452
,
67
71
(
2008
).
5.
W. J.
Munro
,
K. A.
Harrison
,
A. M.
Stephens
,
S. J.
Devitt
, and
K.
Nemoto
, “
From quantum multiplexing to high-performance quantum networking
,”
Nat. Photonics
4
,
792
796
(
2010
).
6.
D. F.
Phillips
,
A.
Fleischhauer
,
A.
Mair
,
R. L.
Walsworth
, and
M. D.
Lukin
, “
Storage of light in atomic vapor
,”
Phys. Rev. Lett.
86
,
783
786
(
2001
).
7.
M.
Hosseini
,
G.
Campbell
,
B. M.
Sparkes
,
P. K.
Lam
, and
B. C.
Buchler
, “
Unconditional room-temperature quantum memory
,”
Nat. Phys.
7
,
794
798
(
2011
).
8.
D.
Kielpinski
,
V.
Meyer
,
M. A.
Rowe
,
C. A.
Sackett
,
W. M.
Itano
,
C.
Monroe
, and
D. J.
Wineland
, “
A decoherence-free quantum memory using trapped ions
,”
Science
291
,
1013
1015
(
2001
).
9.
K.
Heshami
,
C.
Santori
,
B.
Khanaliloo
,
C.
Healey
,
V. M.
Acosta
,
P. E.
Barclay
, and
C.
Simon
, “
Raman quantum memory based on an ensemble of nitrogen-vacancy centers coupled to a microcavity
,”
Phys. Rev. A
89
,
040301
(
2014
).
10.
M.
Afzelius
,
C.
Simon
,
H.
de Riedmatten
, and
N.
Gisin
, “
Multimode quantum memory based on atomic frequency combs
,”
Phys. Rev. A
79
,
052329
(
2009
).
11.
M.
Gündoğan
,
P. M.
Ledingham
,
K.
Kutluer
,
M.
Mazzera
, and
H.
de Riedmatten
, “
Solid state spin-wave quantum memory for time-bin qubits
,”
Phys. Rev. Lett.
114
,
230501
(
2015
).
12.
L.
Zhao
,
X.
Guo
,
C.
Liu
,
Y.
Sun
,
M. M. T.
Loy
, and
S.
Du
, “
Photon pairs with coherence time exceeding 1μs
,”
Optica
1
,
84
88
(
2014
).
13.
K.
Liao
,
H.
Yan
,
J.
He
,
S.
Du
,
Z.-M.
Zhang
, and
S.-L.
Zhu
, “
Subnatural-linewidth polarization-entangled photon pairs with controllable temporal length
,”
Phys. Rev. Lett.
112
,
243602
(
2014
).
14.
P. G.
Kwiat
,
K.
Mattle
,
H.
Weinfurter
,
A.
Zeilinger
,
A. V.
Sergienko
, and
Y.
Shih
, “
New high-intensity source of polarization-entangled photon pairs
,”
Phys. Rev. Lett.
75
,
4337
4341
(
1995
).
15.
P.
Grangier
,
G.
Roger
, and
A.
Aspect
, “
Experimental evidence for a photon anticorrelation effect on a beam splitter: A new light on single-photon interferences
,”
EPL (Europhysics Letters)
1
,
173
(
1986
).
16.
S.
Fasel
,
O.
Alibart
,
S.
Tanzilli
,
P.
Baldi
,
A.
Beveratos
,
N.
Gisin
, and
H.
Zbinden
, “
High-quality asynchronous heralded single-photon source at telecom wavelength
,”
New J. Phys.
6
,
163
(
2004
).
17.
E.
Bocquillon
,
C.
Couteau
,
M.
Razavi
,
R.
Laflamme
, and
G.
Weihs
, “
Coherence measures for heralded single-photon sources
,”
Phys. Rev. A
79
,
035801
(
2009
).
18.
F.
Wolfgramm
,
Y. A.
de Icaza Astiz
,
F. A.
Beduini
,
A.
Cerè
, and
M. W.
Mitchell
, “
Atom-resonant heralded single photons by interaction-free measurement
,”
Phys. Rev. Lett.
106
,
053602
(
2011
).
19.
A.
Haase
,
N.
Piro
,
J.
Eschner
, and
M. W.
Mitchell
, “
Tunable narrowband entangled photon pair source for resonant single-photon single-atom interaction
,”
Opt. Lett.
34
,
55
57
(
2009
).
20.
C.
Clausen
,
I.
Usmani
,
F.
Bussieres
,
N.
Sangouard
,
M.
Afzelius
,
H.
de Riedmatten
, and
N.
Gisin
, “
Quantum storage of photonic entanglement in a crystal
,”
Nature
469
,
508
511
(
2011
).
21.
K.-H.
Luo
,
H.
Herrmann
,
S.
Krapick
,
B.
Brecht
,
R.
Ricken
,
V.
Quiring
,
H.
Suche
,
W.
Sohler
, and
C.
Silberhorn
, “
Direct generation of genuine single-longitudinal-mode narrowband photon pairs
,”
New J. Phys.
17
,
073039
(
2015
).
22.
Z. Y.
Ou
and
Y. J.
Lu
, “
Cavity enhanced spontaneous parametric down-conversion for the prolongation of correlation time between conjugate photons
,”
Phys. Rev. Lett.
83
,
2556
2559
(
1999
).
23.
F.
Wolfgramm
,
X.
Xing
,
A.
Cerè
,
A.
Predojević
,
A. M.
Steinberg
, and
M. W.
Mitchell
, “
Bright filter-free source of indistinguishable photon pairs
,”
Opt. Express
16
,
18145
18151
(
2008
).
24.
X.-H.
Bao
,
Y.
Qian
,
J.
Yang
,
H.
Zhang
,
Z.-B.
Chen
,
T.
Yang
, and
J.-W.
Pan
, “
Generation of narrow-band polarization-entangled photon pairs for atomic quantum memories
,”
Phys. Rev. Lett.
101
,
190501
(
2008
).
25.
M.
Scholz
,
L.
Koch
, and
O.
Benson
, “
Statistics of narrow-band single photons for quantum memories generated by ultrabright cavity-enhanced parametric down-conversion
,”
Phys. Rev. Lett.
102
,
063603
(
2009
).
26.
H.
Zhang
,
X.-M.
Jin
,
J.
Yang
,
H.-N.
Dai
,
S.-J.
Yang
,
T.-M.
Zhao
,
J.
Rui
,
Y.
He
,
X.
Jiang
,
F.
Yang
,
G.-S.
Pan
,
Z.-S.
Yuan
,
Y.
Deng
,
Z.-B.
Chen
,
X.-H.
Bao
,
S.
Chen
,
B.
Zhao
, and
J.-W.
Pan
, “
Preparation and storage of frequency-uncorrelated entangled photons from cavity-enhanced spontaneous parametric downconversion
,”
Nat. Photon.
5
,
628
632
(
2011
).
27.
E.
Pomarico
,
B.
Sanguinetti
,
C. I.
Osorio
,
H.
Herrmann
, and
R. T.
Thew
, “
Engineering integrated pure narrow-band photon sources
,”
New J. Phys.
14
,
033008
(
2012
).
28.
J.
Fekete
,
D.
Rieländer
,
M.
Cristiani
, and
H.
de Riedmatten
, “
Ultranarrow-band photon-pair source compatible with solid state quantum memories and telecommunication networks
,”
Phys. Rev. Lett.
110
,
220502
(
2013
).
29.
Z.-Y.
Zhou
,
D.-S.
Ding
,
Y.
Li
,
F.-Y.
Wang
, and
B.-S.
Shi
, “
Cavity-enhanced bright photon pairs at telecom wavelengths with a triple-resonance configuration
,”
J. Opt. Soc. Am. B
31
,
128
134
(
2014
).
30.
M.
Hosseini
,
B. M.
Sparkes
,
G.
Campbell
,
P. K.
Lam
, and
B. C.
Buchler
, “
High efficiency coherent optical memory with warm rubidium vapour
,”
Nat. Commun.
2
,
174
(
2011
).
31.
M.
Hosseini
,
B. M.
Sparkes
,
G. T.
Campbell
,
P. K.
Lam
, and
B. C.
Buchler
, “
Storage and manipulation of light using a raman gradient-echo process
,”
J. Phys. B: At., Mol. Opt. Phys.
45
,
124004
(
2012
).
32.
B. M.
Sparkes
,
M.
Hosseini
,
G.
Hétet
,
P. K.
Lam
, and
B. C.
Buchler
, “
An ac stark gradient echo memory in cold atoms
,”
Phys. Rev. A
82
,
043847
(
2010
).
33.
B. M.
Sparkes
,
J.
Bernu
,
M.
Hosseini
,
J.
Geng
,
Q.
Glorieux
,
P.
Altin
,
P. K.
Lam
,
N. P.
Robins
, and
B. C.
Buchler
, “
Gradient echo memory in an ultra-high optical depth cold atomic ensemble
,”
New J. Phys.
15
,
085027
(
2013
).
34.
Y.-W.
Cho
,
G. T.
Campbell
,
J. L.
Everett
,
J.
Bernu
,
D. B.
Higginbottom
,
M. T.
Cao
,
J.
Geng
,
N. P.
Robins
,
P. K.
Lam
, and
B. C.
Buchler
, “
Highly efficient optical quantum memory with long coherence time in cold atoms
,”
Optica
3
,
100
107
(
2016
).
35.
M.
Zhong
,
M. P.
Hedges
,
R. L.
Ahlefeldt
,
J. G.
Bartholomew
,
S. E.
Beavan
,
S. M.
Wittig
,
J. J.
Longdell
, and
M. J.
Sellars
, “
Optically addressable nuclear spins in a solid with a six-hour coherence time
,”
Nature
517
,
177
180
(
2015
).
36.
R.
Drever
,
J. L.
Hall
,
F.
Kowalski
,
J.
Hough
,
G.
Ford
,
A.
Munley
, and
H.
Ward
, “
Laser phase and frequency stabilization using an optical resonator
,”
Appl. Phys. B
31
,
97
105
(
1983
).
37.
E.
Black
, “
An introduction to pound-drever-hall laser frequency stabilization
,”
Am. J. Phys.
69
,
79
(
2001
).
38.
G. D.
Boyd
and
D. A.
Kleinman
, “
Parametric interaction of focused gaussian light beams
,”
J. Appl. Phys.
39
,
3597
3639
(
1968
).
39.
H.
Abitan
and
T.
Skettrup
, “
Laser resonators with several mirrors and lenses with the bow-tie laser resonator with compensation for astigmatism and thermal lens effects as an example
,”
J. Opt. A: Pure Appl. Opt.
7
,
7
(
2005
).
40.
U.
Herzog
,
M.
Scholz
, and
O.
Benson
, “
Theory of biphoton generation in a single-resonant optical parametric oscillator far below threshold
,”
Phys. Rev. A
77
,
023826
(
2008
).
41.
F.
Wolfgramm
, “
Atomic quantum metrology with narrowband entangled and squeezed states of light
,” Ph.D. thesis,
The Institute of Photonic Sciences
,
Barcelona, Spain
,
2011
.
42.
R.
Loudon
,
The Quantum Theory of Light
(
Clarendon Press
,
Oxford
,
1973
).

Supplementary Material