Noncollinear antiferromagnet Mn3Sn has attracted wide interest as it is a candidate for Weyl semimetal. Here, we report the observation of topological Hall like signals in Mn3Sn/Pt bilayers grown on Al2O3(0001). X-ray diffraction and scanning transmission electron microscopy results confirm the high epitaxial quality of the c-axis-oriented Mn3Sn films. The detected topological Hall resistivity shows a broad temperature range from 210 to 365 K by tuning the thickness of Mn3Sn from 3 to 15 nm. Compared with previously reported topological Hall effects in Mn3Sn at temperatures below 50 K, the observed high-temperature topological Hall signal is likely due to the stabilization of topological spin textures enabled by the strong spin–orbit coupling of the Pt overlayer and the Dzyaloshinskii–Moriya interaction at the Mn3Sn/Pt interface.

Noncollinear antiferromagnet (AFM) Mn3Sn has drawn significant interest in spintronics research. As a possible Weyl semimetal, its topological band structure with non-zero Berry curvature has led to a series of novel magneto-transport properties, such as large anomalous Hall effect (AHE) and anomalous Nernst effect (ANE).1–3 In addition, topological spin textures can be generated at temperatures (T) below 50 K where a phase transition turns Mn3Sn from a triangular AFM configuration into spin-glass.4–6 At T > 275 K, the energy favors the triangular AFM state in Mn3Sn with a very small out-of-plane canting based on first-principle calculations, resulting in a small spin chirality at high temperatures.7 Recently, it was also reported that the topological Hall effect (THE) has been observed in Mn3Sn crystals near room temperature, while the mechanism is not well understood.8,9

It has been demonstrated that heavy metals (HMs), such as Pt, with large spin–orbit coupling can induce a sizable interfacial Dzyaloshinskii–Moriya interaction (DMI) in Pt/ferromagnet (FM) or Pt/AFM bilayers with an in-plane DMI vector, leading to the formation of topological spin textures.10–12 For Mn3Sn, the triangular AFM spins in the (0001) planes should only lead to the non-zero in-plane AHE.1,7,13 However, in Mn3Sn/Pt bilayers, the large spin–orbit coupling of Pt can break the out-of-plane mirror symmetry in Mn3Sn when hybridizing with the neighboring Mn atoms across the interface.13 In this article, we report the detection of possible topological spin textures in Mn3Sn/Pt bilayers using the topological Hall effect (THE) as well as the presence of the out-of-plane anomalous Hall effect. We observe a broad temperature range of THE from 210 to 365 K through tuning the thickness of the Mn3Sn films.

For the epitaxial growth of c-axis-oriented Mn3Sn films, we first grow a thin Pt at a substrate temperature of 260 °C as a buffer layer on the Al2O3 (0001) substrate, followed by the in situ growth of Mn3Sn at 210 °C on Pt by off-axis sputtering.14 Pt is chosen as a buffer layer because its face-centered cubic (fcc) structure with a lattice constant of 3.912 Å can be grown epitaxially on Al2O3 (0001)15 with high crystalline quality. The resulting Pt (111) buffer layer has a hexagonal in-plane lattice constant of 5.532 Å, which is very close (∼1% lattice mismatch) to the in-plane lattice constant of 5.593 Å for Mn3Sn (0001). Finally, a 3 nm Ta layer is deposited on Mn3Sn at room temperature using off-axis sputtering to protect it from oxidation.

Figure 1(a) shows the 2θ/ω x-ray diffraction (XRD) scans of two Pt buffer layers with thicknesses of 3 and 20 nm grown on Al2O3 (0001) together with a Mn3Sn(45 nm)/Pt(3 nm)/Al2O3 (0001) sample. The clear Laue oscillations in the XRD scan of Pt(20 nm)/Al2O3 indicate the high crystalline quality of the Pt buffer layer. The broad feature from 35° to 41° in both Pt(3 nm)/Al2O3 and Mn3Sn(45 nm)/Pt(3 nm)/Al2O3 is due to the (111) peak of 3 nm Pt. From the Mn3Sn (0002) XRD peak at 39.310°, we obtain the Mn3Sn c-axis lattice constant of 4.580 Å, which is ∼1% larger than the bulk value due to the compressive strain of Mn3Sn on Pt (111). Figure 1(b) shows the rocking curves of the Mn3Sn (0002) and Pt (111) peaks of the Mn3Sn(45 nm)/Pt(3 nm)/Al2O3 sample, which exhibit a full-width-at-half-maximum (FWHM) of 0.005° and 0.004°, respectively, indicating high crystalline quality. Figure 1(c) gives the x-ray reflectivity (XRR) scan of a Pt(3 nm)/Mn3Sn(10 nm)/Pt(3 nm) trilayer on Al2O3 (0001). The fitting to the XRR curve reveals sharp interfaces with an interfacial roughness of 0.2 nm, which is corroborated by atomic force microscopy (AFM) imaging as shown in Fig. S1 in the supplementary material. The crystal ordering of a Mn3Sn(45 nm) film is examined by cross-sectional scanning transmission electron microscopy (STEM) imaging using an aberration corrected FEI Titan 60/300 STEM at 300 kV. The STEM images in Fig. 1(d) confirm the epitaxial continuity of Mn3Sn (0001) planes on Pt (111) grown on the Al2O3 (0001) substrate.

FIG. 1.

(a) 2θ/ω XRD scans of Pt(20 nm), Pt(3 nm), and Mn3Sn(45 nm)/Pt(3 nm) films on Al2O3(0001). (b) XRD rocking curves of the Pt(111) peak for Pt(3 nm)/Al2O3(0001) and the Mn3Sn(0002) peak for Mn3Sn(45 nm)/Pt(3 nm)/Al2O3(0001). (c) XRR scan of Pt(3 nm)/Mn3Sn(10 nm)/Pt(3 nm)/Al2O3(0001) with a fitting curve. (d) STEM image of a Mn3Sn(45 nm)/Pt(3 nm) bilayer on Al2O3(0001).

FIG. 1.

(a) 2θ/ω XRD scans of Pt(20 nm), Pt(3 nm), and Mn3Sn(45 nm)/Pt(3 nm) films on Al2O3(0001). (b) XRD rocking curves of the Pt(111) peak for Pt(3 nm)/Al2O3(0001) and the Mn3Sn(0002) peak for Mn3Sn(45 nm)/Pt(3 nm)/Al2O3(0001). (c) XRR scan of Pt(3 nm)/Mn3Sn(10 nm)/Pt(3 nm)/Al2O3(0001) with a fitting curve. (d) STEM image of a Mn3Sn(45 nm)/Pt(3 nm) bilayer on Al2O3(0001).

Close modal

We measure the magnetization hysteresis loops of the Mn3Sn(45 nm)/Pt(3 nm)/Al2O3(0001) sample at 300 K using a superconducting quantum interference device (SQUID) magnetometer (see Fig. S1 in the supplementary material for more details). The Mn3Sn film exhibits a small magnetic moment of ∼5 emu/cm3 when the field is in-plane along the [112̄0] and [11̄00] directions, which increases to ∼13 emu/cm3 when the field is out-of-plane along [0001]. The measured magnetization is larger than the theoretical predication of 2–3 emu/cm3, possibly due to off-stoichiometry, such as excess Mn or defects in the epitaxial Mn3Sn film.1,3

For magnetotransport measurements, we first grow a Mn3Sn(5 nm)/Pt(1.5 nm) bilayer on Al2O3 (0001), which is patterned into a Hall bar with a current channel width of 100 μm. Figure 2(a) shows a schematic of the Hall measurement on the bilayer with an out-of-plane magnetic field. Figures 2(b) and 2(c) show the longitudinal magnetoresistance MR = ρxx/ρ0 (ρ0 is the zero-field resistivity) and the Hall resistivity (ρxy), respectively, as a function of the out-of-plane magnetic field, H//Mn3Sn[0001]. The ordinary Hall effect (OHE) contribution, ρOHE, with a linear field dependence has been subtracted in Fig. 2(c). The calculation of the Hall resistivity has already considered the shunting effect from Pt and the capping layer. At T = 300 K, a large anomalous Hall resistivity ρAHE = 43 nΩ cm is observed. The non-ferromagnetic origin of the AHE is confirmed by the longitudinal MR as shown in Fig. 2(b), which is non-hysteretic with a magnitude of only <0.05% up to 14 T.4 

FIG. 2.

Electric transport measurements of a Mn3Sn(5 nm)/Pt(1.5 nm) bilayer on Al2O3(0001) with a Hall bar width, w = 100 µm. (a) Schematic of Hall measurement with an out-of-plane magnetic field. (b) Longitudinal magnetoresistivity Δρxx/ρ0 with an out-of-plane field at temperatures from 300 to 355 K. (c) Hall resistivity ρxyρOHE measured from 300 to 355 K with an out-of-plane field, where the black curve is the fitting for ρAHE with Langevin function. (d) ρTHE after subtraction of the fitting curve for ρAHE in (c) at each temperature. (e) Schematic of the in-plane Hall measurement. (f) Longitudinal magnetoresistivity Δρxx/ρ0 with an in-plane field. (g) Hall resistivity ρxyρOHE measured from 300 to 355 K with an in-plane field, where the black curve is the fitting for ρAHE with Langevin function. (h) Hall resistivity after subtraction of the fitting curve for ρAHE in (g); there is no ρTHE signal.

FIG. 2.

Electric transport measurements of a Mn3Sn(5 nm)/Pt(1.5 nm) bilayer on Al2O3(0001) with a Hall bar width, w = 100 µm. (a) Schematic of Hall measurement with an out-of-plane magnetic field. (b) Longitudinal magnetoresistivity Δρxx/ρ0 with an out-of-plane field at temperatures from 300 to 355 K. (c) Hall resistivity ρxyρOHE measured from 300 to 355 K with an out-of-plane field, where the black curve is the fitting for ρAHE with Langevin function. (d) ρTHE after subtraction of the fitting curve for ρAHE in (c) at each temperature. (e) Schematic of the in-plane Hall measurement. (f) Longitudinal magnetoresistivity Δρxx/ρ0 with an in-plane field. (g) Hall resistivity ρxyρOHE measured from 300 to 355 K with an in-plane field, where the black curve is the fitting for ρAHE with Langevin function. (h) Hall resistivity after subtraction of the fitting curve for ρAHE in (g); there is no ρTHE signal.

Close modal

Surprisingly, as temperature increases, the magnitude of ρAHE decreases and changes sign at around 330 K [see Fig. 2(c)], while the longitudinal MR has essentially no change [Fig. 2(b)]. Because the observed AHE in Mn3Sn is not ferromagnetic in origin, we fit the ρAHE loops using the Langevin equation as shown in Fig. 2(c). After subtracting the fitted ρAHE contribution from ρxy, we obtain an additional Hall signal (other than OHE and AHE) in Fig. 2(d). It is generally believed that the detected Hall resistivity includes three contributions: ρxy = ρOHE + ρAHE + ρTHE where the last term arises from the topological Hall effect. The topological Hall signal has a pair of antisymmetric peaks at corresponding positive and negative magnetic fields, which is typically attributed to the formation of topological spin textures. This is consistent with our experimental results in Fig. 2(d). The maximum magnitude of ρTHE occurs near the temperature where ρAHE reserves its sign, which is similar to the previous reports of SrRuO3/SrIrO3 bilayers and SrRuO3 single layers.16,17

To further exclude the possibility of spurious signals, we measure the longitudinal and Hall resistivities of the Mn3Sn(5 nm)/Pt(1.5 nm) bilayer on Al2O3 (0001) with an in-plane magnetic field H//[112̄0], as shown in Figs. 2(e)2(g). Non-zero in-plane ρAHE is detected with similar temperature dependence as the out-of-plane Hall resistivity. However, the magnitude of in-plane ρAHE is approximately an order of magnitude smaller than that of out-of-plane ρAHE. Meanwhile, the in-plane longitudinal MR [Fig. 2(f)] also shows a weak temperature dependence, but its magnitude is about half of the out-of-plane MR. Such an AHE-like signal under the in-plane field was reported before in Mn3Sn,3 which was attributed to its noncollinear spin structure. Compared with previous reports on Mn3Sn bulk single crystals and thin films, our Pt/Mn3Sn bilayer has a larger ρAHE when the field is out-of-plane.1,3Figure 2(h) shows the Hall resistivity after subtracting the fitted ρAHE contribution in Fig. 2(d), which shows no detectable THE signal.

After observing the anomalous Hall and topological Hall effect in the Mn3Sn(5 nm)/Pt(1.5 nm) bilayer, we perform similar measurements on different Mn3Sn thicknesses ranging from 3 to 15 nm. Figure 3(a) shows the ρTHE hysteresis loops in an out-of-plane field for the 3, 5, and 15 nm Mn3Sn samples at the temperature where the magnitude of ρTHE reaches the maximum. The 3 nm Mn3Sn sample shows zero coercivity and two antisymmetric THE peaks in each branch (e.g., from +14 to −14 T) of the hysteresis loop. For the 5 nm Mn3Sn sample, there is a small coercivity and two antisymmetric THE peaks in each branch. However, for the 15 nm sample, there is only one THE peak in each branch with a sizable coercivity. Thus, both the coercivity and hysteresis behavior of the topological Hall effect exhibit clear dependence on the thickness of the Mn3Sn film.

FIG. 3.

(a) Field dependence of ρTHE for the 3, 5, and 15 nm Mn3Sn samples at the temperature where ρTHE reaches the maximum. (b) ρTHE−max and the temperature (TTHE−max) where ρTHE reaches the maximum as a function of Mn3Sn thicknesses for Mn3Sn/Pt bilayers.

FIG. 3.

(a) Field dependence of ρTHE for the 3, 5, and 15 nm Mn3Sn samples at the temperature where ρTHE reaches the maximum. (b) ρTHE−max and the temperature (TTHE−max) where ρTHE reaches the maximum as a function of Mn3Sn thicknesses for Mn3Sn/Pt bilayers.

Close modal

We define ρTHE−max as the maximum THE resistivity [labeled in Fig. 3(a) for the 5 nm sample] observed at T = TTHE−max, which is 330 K as shown in Fig. 2(d). Figure 3(b) plots the Mn3Sn thickness dependencies of ρTHE−max and TTHE−max. The magnitude of ρTHE−max decreases from 5 to 15 nm and vanishes at 45 nm (see the supplementary material for more results). This agrees with the behavior expected from the interfacial DMI due to the broken inversion symmetry at the Mn3Sn/Pt interface as the origin of the THE. However, values of ρTHE−max for the 3 and 4 nm samples are smaller than that of the 5 nm sample, which deviates from the mechanism of interfacial DMI induced topological spin textures. This may be due to the lower quality of the Mn3Sn film at thicknesses below 5 nm, although we have no direct evidence. Meanwhile, TTHE−max initially increases quickly from 3 to 5 nm Mn3Sn and then reaches a plateau at 10–15 nm. Bulk Mn3Sn has a Néel temperature (TN) of ∼420 K, which generally decreases in thin films.18 Thus, the tunability of the topological Hall effect is correlated with the change in TN of Mn3Sn thin films through thickness control. This is consistent with a previously reported phase diagram in ferromagnetic systems as the topological Hall effect emerges near the Curie temperature (TC).19 

To summarize our results, Fig. 4 shows the field-temperature phase diagrams of ρTHE for the 3, 5, 10, and 15 nm Mn3Sn films for both the decreasing and increasing field branches of the hysteresis loops, indicating the phase space of topological spin texture. As the thickness of Mn3Sn increases, the temperature range of ρTHE increases from 210 to 225 K for 3 nm Mn3Sn to 345–365 K for 15 nm Mn3Sn. Previously, the THE in Mn3Sn was observed only at temperatures below 50 K, where the triangular spin state transitions into a glassy ferromagnetic state. For the triangular spin state of Mn3Sn, the small intrinsic DMI vector is perpendicular to the in-plane (0001), which makes it serve as an in-plane anisotropy.20 Thus, it is predicted that the spin chirality of Mn3Sn is small. However, heavy metal Pt provides a strong interfacial DMI in Mn3Sn/Pt bilayers, which potentially generates topological spin textures in Mn3Sn. The emergence of the skyrmion phase in frustrated triangular AFM with DMI has been theoretically predicted by Monte-Carlo simulations.21 The observation of the topological Hall effect offers evidence for the existence of chiral spin textures in the Mn3Sn/Pt bilayers.

FIG. 4.

(a)–(h) HT phase diagrams of topological Hall resistivity phase diagrams for Mn3Sn(t)/Pt(1.5 nm)/Al2O3(0001) with t = 3, 5, 10, and 15 nm. The plots on the left have the field sweeping from positive to negative field, and the plots on the right have the field sweeping in the opposite direction.

FIG. 4.

(a)–(h) HT phase diagrams of topological Hall resistivity phase diagrams for Mn3Sn(t)/Pt(1.5 nm)/Al2O3(0001) with t = 3, 5, 10, and 15 nm. The plots on the left have the field sweeping from positive to negative field, and the plots on the right have the field sweeping in the opposite direction.

Close modal

Previously,22 positive AHE was reported in Pt/Mn3Sn (0001) bilayers with 60 nm Mn3Sn at temperatures from 2 to 300 K, where the observed AHE was explained as the topological Hall resistivity induced by real space spin chirality under an out-of-plane magnetic field. Similar positive AHE is also observed in our 45 nm Mn3Sn sample with a comparable magnitude and temperature range. However, for thinner Mn3Sn, we observe a sign reversal of the AHE. This is similar to the AHE and THE shown in a well studied SrIrO3/SrRuO3 bilayer system.17 

Recently, it was proposed that the THE-like signal observed in some systems, such as single layer SrRuO3, could be due to the superposition of different AHE contributions with opposite signs.23 However, it is not likely to be the case here. AHE sign change occurs in our 5 nm Mn3Sn sample with both out-of-plane and in-plane fields. If the THE-like signal originates from the superposition of two opposite AHE signals, it should appear in both field orientations. However, we only detect THE when the field is out-of-plane, which is consistent with the prediction that the interfacial DMI tilts the noncollinear spins toward out-of-plane, resulting in non-zero topological charges. To fully confirm the existence of topological spin textures in Mn3Sn/Pt bilayers, direct imaging is required; however, imaging of noncollinear AFM spin structures remains a challenging task.

In summary, we observe the topological Hall effect in Mn3Sn/Pt bilayers within a broad Mn3Sn thickness and temperature range. The high tunability of spin textures in Mn3Sn/Pt bilayers through thickness control of the Mn3Sn layer offers potential for spintronic applications and provides insights into the underlying physics of the topological band structure in the Weyl semimetal Mn3Sn.

See the supplementary material for epitaxy and magnetic properties of Mn3Sn/Pt films, Hall measurements with different Hall bar channel widths, and Hall measurements of different Mn3Sn film thicknesses.

This work was primarily supported by the Department of Energy (DOE), Office of Science, Basic Energy Sciences, under Grant No. DE-SC0001304. M.Z. and J.H. acknowledge partial support for the STEM work by the Center for Emergent Materials, an NSF-funded MRSEC, under Grant No. DMR-2011876.

The data that support the findings of this study are available within the article and its supplementary material.

1.
S.
Nakatsuji
,
N.
Kiyohara
, and
T.
Higo
, “
Large anomalous Hall effect in a non-collinear antiferromagnet at room temperature
,”
Nature
527
,
212
(
2015
).
2.
M.
Ikhlas
,
T.
Tomita
,
T.
Koretsune
,
M.-T.
Suzuki
,
D.
Nishio-Hamane
,
R.
Arita
,
Y.
Otani
, and
S.
Nakatsuji
, “
Large anomalous Nernst effect at room temperature in a chiral antiferromagnet
,”
Nat. Phys.
13
,
1085
1090
(
2017
).
3.
Y.
You
,
X.
Chen
,
X.
Zhou
,
Y.
Gu
,
R.
Zhang
,
F.
Pan
, and
C.
Song
, “
Anomalous Hall effect–like behavior with in-plane magnetic field in noncollinear antiferromagnetic Mn3Sn films
,”
Adv. Electron. Mater.
5
,
1800818
(
2019
).
4.
J. M.
Taylor
,
A.
Markou
,
E.
Lesne
,
P. K.
Sivakumar
,
C.
Luo
,
F.
Radu
,
P.
Werner
,
C.
Felser
, and
S. S. P.
Parkin
, “
Anomalous and topological Hall effects in epitaxial thin films of the noncollinear antiferromagnet Mn3Sn
,”
Phys. Rev. B
101
,
094404
(
2020
).
5.
W. J.
Feng
,
D.
Li
,
W. J.
Ren
,
Y. B.
Li
,
W. F.
Li
,
J.
Li
,
Y. Q.
Zhang
, and
Z. D.
Zhang
, “
Glassy ferromagnetism in Ni3Sn-type Mn3.1Sn0.9
,”
Phys. Rev. B
73
,
205105
(
2006
).
6.
P. K.
Rout
,
P. V. P.
Madduri
,
S. K.
Manna
, and
A. K.
Nayak
, “
Field-induced topological Hall effect in the noncoplanar triangular antiferromagnetic geometry of Mn3Sn
,”
Phys. Rev. B
99
,
094430
(
2019
).
7.
J.
Kübler
and
C.
Felser
, “
Non-collinear antiferromagnets and the anomalous Hall effect
,”
Europhys. Lett.
108
,
67001
(
2014
).
8.
J.
Yan
,
X.
Luo
,
H. Y.
Lv
,
Y.
Sun
,
P.
Tong
,
W. J.
Lu
,
X. B.
Zhu
,
W. H.
Song
, and
Y. P.
Sun
, “
Room-temperature angular-dependent topological Hall effect in chiral antiferromagnetic Weyl semimetal Mn3Sn
,”
Appl. Phys. Lett.
115
,
102404
(
2019
).
9.
J. J.
Deng
,
J.
Li
,
Y.
Wang
,
X.
Wu
,
X. T.
Niu
,
L.
Ma
,
D. W.
Zhao
,
C. M.
Zhen
,
D. L.
Hou
,
E. K.
Liu
,
W. H.
Wang
, and
G. H.
Wu
, “
Effect of residual strain on non-collinear antiferromagnetic structure in Weyl semimetal Mn3Sn
,” arXiv:2101.05055 (
2021
).
10.
A. S.
Ahmed
,
A. J.
Lee
,
N.
Bagués
,
B. A.
McCullian
,
A. M. A.
Thabt
,
A.
Perrine
,
P.-K.
Wu
,
J. R.
Rowland
,
M.
Randeria
,
P. C.
Hammel
,
D. W.
McComb
, and
F.
Yang
, “
Spin-Hall topological Hall effect in highly tunable Pt/ferrimagnetic-insulator bilayers
,”
Nano Lett.
19
,
5683
(
2019
).
11.
Y.
Cheng
,
S. S.
Yu
,
M. L.
Zhu
,
J.
Hwang
, and
F. Y.
Yang
, “
Evidence of the topological Hall effect in Pt/antiferromagnetic insulator bilayers
,”
Phys. Rev. Lett.
123
,
237206
(
2019
).
12.
Q.
Shao
,
Y.
Liu
,
G.
Yu
,
S. K.
Kim
,
X.
Che
,
C.
Tang
,
Q. L.
He
,
Y.
Tserkovnyak
,
J.
Shi
, and
K. L.
Wang
, “
Topological Hall effect at above room temperature in heterostructures composed of a magnetic insulator and a heavy metal
,”
Nat. Electron.
2
,
182
(
2019
).
13.
H.
Chen
,
Q.
Niu
, and
A. H.
MacDonald
, “
Anomalous Hall effect arising from noncollinear antiferromagnetism
,”
Phys. Rev. Lett.
112
,
017205
(
2014
).
14.
F.
Yang
and
P.
Chris Hammel
, “
Topical review: FMR-driven spin pumping in Y3Fe5O12-based structures
,”
J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys.
51
,
253001
(
2018
).
15.
H.
Tanaka
and
M.
Taniguchi
, “
Single crystalline epitaxial platinum film on Al2O3(0001) prepared by oxygen-doped sputtering deposition
,”
Jpn. J. Appl. Phys., Part 1
56
,
058001
(
2017
).
16.
Q.
Qin
,
L.
Liu
,
W.
Lin
,
X.
Shu
,
Q.
Xie
,
Z.
Lim
,
C.
Li
,
S.
He
,
G. M.
Chow
, and
J.
Chen
, “
Emergence of topological Hall effect in a SrRuO3 single layer
,”
Adv. Mater.
31
,
1807008
(
2019
).
17.
J.
Matsuno
,
N.
Ogawa
,
K.
Yasuda
,
F.
Kagawa
,
W.
Koshibae
,
N.
Nagaosa
,
Y.
Tokura
, and
M.
Kawasaki
, “
Interface-driven topological Hall effect in SrRuO3-SrIrO3 bilayer
,”
Sci. Adv.
2
,
e1600304
(
2016
).
18.
A. L.
Balk
,
N. H.
Sung
,
S. M.
Thomas
,
P. F. S.
Rosa
,
R. D.
McDonald
,
J. D.
Thompson
,
E. D.
Bauer
,
F.
Ronning
, and
S. A.
Crooker
, “
Comparing the anomalous Hall effect and the magneto-optical Kerr effect through antiferromagnetic phase transitions in Mn3Sn
,”
Appl. Phys. Lett.
114
,
032401
(
2019
).
19.
A.
Neubauer
,
C.
Pfleiderer
,
B.
Binz
,
A.
Rosch
,
R.
Ritz
,
P. G.
Niklowitz
, and
P.
Boni
, “
Topological Hall effect in the A phase of MnSi
,”
Phys. Rev. Lett.
102
,
186602
(
2009
).
20.
P.
Park
,
J.
Oh
,
K.
Uhlířová
,
J.
Jackson
,
A.
Deák
,
L.
Szunyogh
,
K. H.
Lee
,
H.
Cho
,
H.-L.
Kim
,
H. C.
Walker
,
D.
Adroja
,
V.
Sechovský
, and
J.-G.
Park
, “
Magnetic excitations in non-collinear antiferromagnetic Weyl semimetal Mn3Sn
,”
npj Quantum Mater.
3
,
63
(
2018
).
21.
M.
Mohylna
and
M.
Žukovič
, “
Emergence of a skyrmion phase in a frustrated Heisenberg antiferromagnet with Dzyaloshinskii-Moriya interaction
,”
Acta Phys. Pol., A
137
,
616
(
2020
).
22.
D.
Khadka
,
T. R.
Thapaliya
,
S.
Hurtado Parra
,
X.
Han
,
J.
Wen
,
R. F.
Need
,
P.
Khanal
,
W.
Wang
,
J.
Zang
,
J. M.
Kikkawa
,
L.
Wu
, and
S. X.
Huang
, “
Kondo physics in antiferromagnetic Weyl semimetal Mn3+xSn1−x films
,”
Sci. Adv.
6
,
eabc1977
(
2020
).
23.
G.
Kimbell
,
P. M.
Sass
,
B.
Woltjes
,
E. K.
Ko
,
T. W.
Noh
,
W. D.
Wu
, and
J. W. A.
Robinson
, “
Two-channel anomalous Hall effect in SrRuO3
,”
Phys. Rev. Mater.
4
,
054414
(
2020
).

Supplementary Material