Ions and biomolecules are the languages that biological systems use to transfer signals in intracellular communication and organism function. As such, bioelectronic devices that conduct ions and biomolecules rather than electrons and holes are particularly suited for biological integration. Among these ions, protons (H+) are important in many biochemical reactions including neuronal excitability and oxidative phosphorylation of adenosine triphosphate (ATP). In this Research Update, we describe our efforts in measuring and controlling the concentration of H+ ions in biological systems using bioelectronic devices with contacts that are made of palladium and palladium hydride (Pd/PdHx). Pd/PdHx contacts act as an electron to proton transducer and can be used in artificial membranes containing ion channels, biohybrid photodetectors, the delivery of biochemical stimuli, pH sensitive glucose sensing, and precise control of pH using machine learning.

Ions and biomolecules dominate intra- and inter-cell communication in biological processes.1,2 Bioelectronics bridges biology and electronics with sensors and actuators with many potential applications ranging from therapeutics to synthetic biology.3,4 Hybrid materials that conduct both ions and electrons can create a seamless interface between bioelectronic devices and biological systems.5,6 This interface involves more efficient ion-to-electron conversion with low impedance3,7,8 in applications such as drug delivery,5,9 tissue regeneration,10 and neural recording and stimulation.11,12 Iontronic devices deliver and sense chemical signals to directly control physiological processes.13,14 Examples include organic electronic ion pumps (OEIPs) that deliver ions and biomolecules via electrophoresis to treat neuropathic pain in animal models15 and organic electrochemical transistors (OECTs) that sense biophysical signals.16 Among all the ionic species in physiological environment, protons (H+) play a critical role. Proton concentration (pH) affects oxidative phosphorylation of adenosine triphosphate (ATP),17 enzyme activity,18 gene expression,19 muscle contraction,20 and neuronal excitability.21,22 The regulation of pH has been used as therapy in cancer treatment23 and epileptic seizure control.24 Many biomaterials are proton conductors including chitosan,25,26 proteins,27,28 and glycosaminoglycans.29 In these materials, protons hop along the hydrogen bonded network formed by the hydrated polymer chains following the Grotthuss mechanism.30 To measure proton currents in these conducting materials, palladium/palladium hydride (Pd/PdHx) used as contact converts a H+ current into an electrical current, and vice versa.31–35 Here, we discuss recent results from using Pd/PdHx as a proton conducting bioelectronic interface with solution for artificial membranes with ion channels, pH triggered delivery of biochemicals, pH enabled glucose sensing, and closed-loop control of pH actuation and sensing using a self-adaptive machine learning (ML) based feedback controller (Fig. 1).36 

FIG. 1.

Pd/PdHx contacts change pH in an aqueous solution by electronic means. Examples include artificial membranes with ion channels, pH enabled sensing, pH triggered biochemical delivery, and bioelectronic control of pH using a proton pump (actuator). Adapted with permission from Soto-Rodríguez et al., Adv. Mater. 28(31), 6581–6585 (2016). Copyright 2016 Wiley; Hemmatian et al. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 10(26), 21782–21787 (2018). Copyright 2018 American Chemical Society; Strakosas et al. Sci. Rep. 9(1), 10844 (2019). Copyright 2019 Author(s), licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 international license. Jafari et al., IEEE Control Syst. Lett. 5, 1133 (2020). Copyright 2020 IEEE.

FIG. 1.

Pd/PdHx contacts change pH in an aqueous solution by electronic means. Examples include artificial membranes with ion channels, pH enabled sensing, pH triggered biochemical delivery, and bioelectronic control of pH using a proton pump (actuator). Adapted with permission from Soto-Rodríguez et al., Adv. Mater. 28(31), 6581–6585 (2016). Copyright 2016 Wiley; Hemmatian et al. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 10(26), 21782–21787 (2018). Copyright 2018 American Chemical Society; Strakosas et al. Sci. Rep. 9(1), 10844 (2019). Copyright 2019 Author(s), licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 international license. Jafari et al., IEEE Control Syst. Lett. 5, 1133 (2020). Copyright 2020 IEEE.

Close modal

Most metals are excellent contacts for e but poor for H+, so most investigations on proton conduction use alternating current to avoid ion accumulation at the interface. The couple Pd/PdHx can act as a H+ to electron transducer, resulting in a proton-transparent contact for DC measurements of proton conducting materials.25,26 Pd has a strong affinity to hydrogen and forms palladium hydride (PdHx) either by absorbing hydrogen from H2 gas or from H+ in solution as a reversible hydrogen electrode in electrochemistry. The incorporation of H+ from the solution into Pd is potential dependent and follows the reversible reduction, H+ + e ↔ H, at the Pd/PdHx–solution interface and the subsequent physisorption of H onto Pd to form PdHx.37 An electrical potential applied (V) on the Pd/PdHx contact shifts the reaction equilibrium and induces the transfer of H+ to or from the solution, which effectively controls [H+] in the solution (Fig. 2). In brief, when V < 0 and the contact is at a lower potential than the solution, an H+ in solution is adsorbed to the Pd/solution interface where it is reduced to PdHads by an incoming e. PdHads subsequently absorbs onto the Pd subsurface to form PdHsubs and finally diffuses into the bulk Pd to form PdHbulk following the concentration gradient.38 The net result is the removal of an H+ from the solution for every e provided by the leads. This, in turn, lowers [H+] and increases pH. When V > 0, some of the H that is part of PdHads oxidizes at the Pd surface to form H+ and dissolves into solution with the e going into the electronic leads. The additional H+ in solution increases [H+] and consequently decreases pH.

FIG. 2.

(a) Given a negative potential, H+ is first adsorbed onto the surface of Pd (Pdads), then absorbed onto the subsurface layer, Pdsubs, and further diffuses into bulk Pd to form PdHbulk. (b) Given a positive potential, H+ is first released from the surface, PdHads, then from the subsurface layer (Pdsubs) to the surface (Pdads), and further diffuses from PdHbulk.

FIG. 2.

(a) Given a negative potential, H+ is first adsorbed onto the surface of Pd (Pdads), then absorbed onto the subsurface layer, Pdsubs, and further diffuses into bulk Pd to form PdHbulk. (b) Given a positive potential, H+ is first released from the surface, PdHads, then from the subsurface layer (Pdsubs) to the surface (Pdads), and further diffuses from PdHbulk.

Close modal

A more quantitative way to describe the H+ transfer across the interface uses the protochemical potential (μ) because H+ transfer does not only follow V but is also affected by pH of the solution.32 We can define the difference in the protochemical potential between PdHxPdHx) and the solution (μpH) using the following equation:

μPdHμpH=eV+kBT lnaH+(pH2)1/2,
(1)

where aH+ is the activity of H+ in solution with pH = −log aH+, pH2 being the hydrogen partial pressure in Pd, and V being the potential difference between Pd and solution.

When Eq. (1) leads to a positive value, H+ will transfer from the contact to the solution until equilibrium is reached. When Eq. (1) leads to a negative value, H+ will transfer from the solution to the contact until equilibrium is reached. In general, for solutions with low pH (high [H+]), the transfer of H+ into Pd will be favored vs transferring H+ from the contact into the solution. The opposite is true for solutions with high pH (low [H+]).

In a biological system, most intercellular communication is mediated by membrane proteins and ion channels that passively allow or actively control the flow of ions and small molecules across the cell membrane.39 Thus, a bioelectronic device with ion channels that control ionic flow across a supported lipid bilayer (SLB) is ideal for interfacing with biological systems. Our group has demonstrated a bio-protonic device with Pd/PdHx contacts that control H+ currents and modulate pH gradients across phospholipid membranes, as shown in Fig. 3(a).40 Here, the SLB mimics the function of a cell membrane, acting as a barrier to divide the solution into bulk and isolation layers, and a self-healing support for the insertion of ion channels, gramicidin A (gA) and alamethicin (ALM). gA is an ion channel that allows the passage of small cations, while remaining impermeable to anions [Fig. 3(a), left].41 A voltage between the Pd/PdHx contacts and AgCl electrode in the bulk solution controls the H+ flow (iH+) across the SLB. When gA is present, iH+ is much larger compared to that of only SLB. ALM is a voltage-gated ion channel that selectively transports cations in the direction of V applied and closes for V = 0 V [Fig. 3(a), right], which functions as a bidirectional voltage-gated channel analogous to an ON–OFF switch.41 When ALM is open, iH+ has a similar response to iH+ for gA. When ALM is closed for lower voltages, iH+ is much smaller as expected because ALM is in the closed state.

FIG. 3.

(a) Schematic of the bioprotonic device integrated with ion channels, gA and ALM, which supports the flow of H+ across the SLB upon application of a voltage to the PdHx contact.40 Hemmatian et al. Nat. Commun. 7(1), 12981 (2016). Copyright 2016 Author(s), licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 international license. (b) Integration of deltarhodopsin with SLB and Pd/PdHx contacts enables light-activated control of H+ flow by conventional electronics with on/off response complete in seconds.42 Reproduced with permission from Soto-Rodríguez et al., Adv. Mater. 28 (31), 6581–6585 (2016). Copyright 2016 Wiley. (c) Carbon nanotube porins act as an artificial ion channel that can conduct protons with higher conductivity than gramicidin.43 Hemmatian et al., PLoS One 14(2) (2019). Copyright 2019 Author(s), licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 international license. (d) Pd/PdHx is used to measure H+ conductivity of a synthetic membrane protein, RHPs.33 Reproduced with permission from Jiang et al. Nature 577(7789), 216–220 (2020). Copyright 2020 Nature.

FIG. 3.

(a) Schematic of the bioprotonic device integrated with ion channels, gA and ALM, which supports the flow of H+ across the SLB upon application of a voltage to the PdHx contact.40 Hemmatian et al. Nat. Commun. 7(1), 12981 (2016). Copyright 2016 Author(s), licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 international license. (b) Integration of deltarhodopsin with SLB and Pd/PdHx contacts enables light-activated control of H+ flow by conventional electronics with on/off response complete in seconds.42 Reproduced with permission from Soto-Rodríguez et al., Adv. Mater. 28 (31), 6581–6585 (2016). Copyright 2016 Wiley. (c) Carbon nanotube porins act as an artificial ion channel that can conduct protons with higher conductivity than gramicidin.43 Hemmatian et al., PLoS One 14(2) (2019). Copyright 2019 Author(s), licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 international license. (d) Pd/PdHx is used to measure H+ conductivity of a synthetic membrane protein, RHPs.33 Reproduced with permission from Jiang et al. Nature 577(7789), 216–220 (2020). Copyright 2020 Nature.

Close modal

In addition to gramicidin and alamethacin, we demonstrated optical control of H+ flow with a similar design by incorporating detarhodhopsin (HtdR), a light-activated proton pump, into the SLB.42 In Fig. 3(b), H+ flow is recorded by using the Pd/PdHx contact when HtdR is illuminated with the correct wavelength of light, while no flow is recorded in the dark. The responsive behavior is highly reproducible in shape and magnitude over repeated cycles and much faster than that made from a transistor.44 Recently, our collaborators have engineered different peptides into this platform and developed a photodetector that responds to different wavelengths of light.45 In detail, we integrated Pd/PdHx contacts with blue absorbing proteorhodopsin (BPR) and green absorbing proteorhodopsin (GPR); thus, the devices exhibit wavelength dependent photocurrent production when illuminated between 450 nm and 600 nm. This can be considered as a primary step toward the construction of biological cameras with potential applications in artificial vision and retinal prostheses. In Fig. 3(c), we used carbon nanotube porins (CNTPs)46,47 as synthesized ion channels inserted in the SLB and integrated them with Pd/PdHx contacts to control H+ flow across the SLB through CNTPs by electrical means, which is a fully synthetic platform.43 Moreover, since functionalized CNTs have the capability to penetrate plasma membranes, we suggest that CNTPs may be able to connect the bioprotonic devices directly with cells to modulate intracellular pH.

More recently, in collaboration with the Xu group, we used this Pd/PdHx platform to integrate four-monomer-based random heteropolymers (RHPs) that mimic membrane proteins.33 The bioprotonic device described above was used here to verify the selective proton transport across the SLB through the RHP [Fig. 3(d)]. Incorporating RHP1 into the SLB increased the membrane permeability from 8.1 × 10−5 s−1 to 1.6 × 10−2 s−1.

The pH of a solution does not only affect the physiological environment but also electrochemical reactions at metal oxide surfaces. For example, cobalt oxide is a non-enzymatic glucose sensor that is only efficient at high pH.35 The electrochemical redox reaction that involves glucose oxidation has much higher efficiency with CoO2 (pH > 10) than with Co3O4 that is found in neutral conditions. As such, the use of cobalt oxide as a glucose sensor is limited in physiological conditions and fluids such as sweat and tears whose pH is close to 7. To overcome this limitation, our group built a cobalt oxide glucose sensor that exploits localized and transient alkaline conditions (high pH) from a Pd/PdHx contact (Fig. 4).35 In Fig. 4(a), for VpH = −1 V, Pd absorbs H+ from the electrolyte and increases the local pH that coverts Co3O4 into CoO2 for sensing. In Fig. 4(b), for VpH = 0 V, the device is off restoring neutral local conditions and thus allowing for the integration into wearables without creating long-term localized alkalosis, which would damage the skin.48,49Figures 4(c) and 4(d) show glucose sensing current and device calibration at pH 7 and pH 11 cycled by applying VpH, respectively. At pH 7, the sensing current, Ig, cannot be distinguished below 1 mM glucose, and Ig is overall smaller than Ig at pH 11 for all glucose concentrations. This restriction of working only at high pH does not only exist in cobalt oxide sensors but also occurs in many metal oxide and inorganic material-based sensors that oxidize target molecules.50 Thus, the localized and transient pH control can be broadly applied to the detection of various biological relevant analytes, such as dopamine and ascorbic acid,51 and enables continuous sensing in neutral biological fluid.

FIG. 4.

(a) When the device is on, VpH = −1 V, a Pd contact absorbs H+ from the solution and increases localized pH and enables the conversion from Co3O4 to the more reactive CoO2 oxidized state. (b) When the device is off, VpH = 0 V, pH is at physiological values, typically pH 7, no obvious sensing occurs from Au/Co3O4. (c) Current response of a device at a constant voltage of Vg = 0.5 V over increasing concentrations of glucose in 0.1M NaCl solution. Pd contacts cycle the pH between pH 7 (VpH ≥ 0 V) and pH 11 (VpH = −1 V). (d) Calibration curve of a sensing platform vs glucose concentration with a fit for pH 11 and pH 7.35 Strakosas et al. Sci. Rep. 9(1), 10844 (2019). Copyright 2019 Author(s), licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 international license.

FIG. 4.

(a) When the device is on, VpH = −1 V, a Pd contact absorbs H+ from the solution and increases localized pH and enables the conversion from Co3O4 to the more reactive CoO2 oxidized state. (b) When the device is off, VpH = 0 V, pH is at physiological values, typically pH 7, no obvious sensing occurs from Au/Co3O4. (c) Current response of a device at a constant voltage of Vg = 0.5 V over increasing concentrations of glucose in 0.1M NaCl solution. Pd contacts cycle the pH between pH 7 (VpH ≥ 0 V) and pH 11 (VpH = −1 V). (d) Calibration curve of a sensing platform vs glucose concentration with a fit for pH 11 and pH 7.35 Strakosas et al. Sci. Rep. 9(1), 10844 (2019). Copyright 2019 Author(s), licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 international license.

Close modal

The intracellular pH levels of the cytosol and different organelles are critical for many cell functions. The regulation of pH has significance in the modulation of cell function, metabolism, as well as bioelectronic therapies.52,53 We have demonstrated that the pH control using Pd/PdHx contacts can affect the rate of enzyme reactions and bioluminescence.54 The local pH is also a parameter that can trigger delivery of drugs from vesicles for precise localized delivery.55 We demonstrated Pd/PdHx contacts to control pH in physiological relevant media and trigger the delivery of a fluorescent label in cardiac fibroblast cells [Fig. 5(a)].56 A positive potential applied on Pd/PdHx increases [H+] in solution and decreased the pH, triggering the disruption of acid sensitive microparticles containing fluorescein diacetate (FDA). The FDA released into solution is uptaken by the cardiac fibroblast where it turned into fluorescein. The capability of pH control with Pd/PdHx contacts depends on the capacity of the electrodes to absorb and release H+, and it is usually limited to pH values close to the original pH of the solution. To expand the pH modulation range in the physiological environment, we integrated Pd/PdHx contacts with an organic electronic ion pump (OEIP), which is able to modulate pH in a larger range [Fig. 5(b)].34 Here, Pd/PdHx is used as the electrode contacts in both the reservoir (right) and the target (left) electrolyte. A mixture of Poly(vinyl alcohol):Polystyrene Sulfonate (PVA:PSS) works as the H+ conducting material in which H+ is driven by Vd. The innovative design of a Donnan, Polyethylenimine (PEI), later alleviates the passive diffusion from the reservoir to the target. By applying positive Vd, H+ are transferred from the reservoir to the target solution, as illustrated by the arrow in Fig. 5(b), and pH in the buffer decreases. When Vd is reversed, H+ are transferred from the buffer solution back to the reservoir and increase pH. Here, we put the pH sensitive microparticles encapsulated with FDA in the buffer solution and switch the environment to the acidic condition by applying Vd = 1 V for 180 s. After incubation for 24 h, we induce a basic condition to hydrolyze FDA into fluorescein and take fluorescence images of the sample kept at pH 7.4 [Fig. 5(c)] and at pH 6 and 8 [Fig. 5(d)]. This platform uses a H+ reservoir to provide a large supply of H+ to the Pd/PdHx contact in the target solution and shows the capability to modulate pH in buffer conditions, which has the potential to control a variety of biochemical reactions that require a larger dynamic range.

FIG. 5.

(a) Schematic of the bioelectronic pH stimulation for chemical messenger delivery. Reproduced with permission from ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 10(26), 21782–21787 (2018). Copyright 2018 American Chemical Society. (b) Schematic of a proton modulator with Pd/PdH as the electrodes. (c) Calculated pH change when Vd = 1 V and Vd = −1 V. Overlay images showing both Ac-Dextran microparticles (red dots) and FDA-fluorescein (green) released from the particles on top of a PdNP contact at pH 7.4 (c) and at pH 6 and 8 (d), respectively. Scale bar: 50 µm.34 Strakosas et al. Adv. Sci. 6(7), 1800935 (2019). Copyright 2019 Author(s), licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 international license.

FIG. 5.

(a) Schematic of the bioelectronic pH stimulation for chemical messenger delivery. Reproduced with permission from ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 10(26), 21782–21787 (2018). Copyright 2018 American Chemical Society. (b) Schematic of a proton modulator with Pd/PdH as the electrodes. (c) Calculated pH change when Vd = 1 V and Vd = −1 V. Overlay images showing both Ac-Dextran microparticles (red dots) and FDA-fluorescein (green) released from the particles on top of a PdNP contact at pH 7.4 (c) and at pH 6 and 8 (d), respectively. Scale bar: 50 µm.34 Strakosas et al. Adv. Sci. 6(7), 1800935 (2019). Copyright 2019 Author(s), licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 international license.

Close modal

Life revolves around closed-loop feedback control in regulatory systems and organisms.57 Closing the loop of actuation and sensing using bioelectronic devices can provide new opportunities for bioelectronic interfacing. This closed-loop control is also challenging due to the complexity of biological systems and the risk of affecting their innate self-regulation. We have recently introduced closed-loop control of cell membrane voltage (Vmem) using bioelectronic devices controlled by using a self-adaptive machine learning (ML) based feedback controller to close the loop between sensing and actuation [Fig. 6(a)].36,58 In detail, the H+ pump is able to change pH with an applied voltage, and the pH change is monitored with a fluorescence dye in real time. The fluorescence intensity is read by using the ML controller, which compares it with the desired value and decides whether further actuation (the applied voltage on H+ pump) is required. Figure 6(b) shows that a specific [H+] value can be regulated precisely in the buffered fluids in this automated fashion, such as triangle, sine, and square waveforms. By regulating extracellular pH of human-induced pluripotent stem cells (hiPSCs), we showed a proof-of-concept prolonged control of membrane voltage (Vmem) toward a desired set-point over 10 h [Fig. 6(c)]. This is important because biological systems are adaptive and will typical react with their own feedback to localized changes in pH and the ML controller can adapt to the cellular self-regulation mechanisms.

FIG. 6.

(a) A schematic of the experimental setup: H+ pump induces a pH change in solution upon an applied voltage; pH is monitored by fluorescence dye in real time; ML controller reads the fluorescence intensity, compares it with the desired [H+], and decides the applied voltage on a H+ pump to achieve the target [H+] value. (b) Temporal pH control monitored by fluorescence dye (red traces), the target (black dotted traces), and the applied voltage by using the ML controller (blue dotted traces). (c) (Left) Pulsed-control algorithm used for prolonged control of hiPSCs, in which the ML controller switches between stimulation (H+ pump on) and float (H+ pump off). (Right) The mean fluorescence intensity over the floating period was calculated (black dotted lines), and the target fluorescence intensity during stimulation is set to be two fluorescence units above that value (black solid lines). The red traces represent the fluorescence intensity of ArcLight-hiPSCs, which increases with higher Vmem induced by higher extracellular pH.58 Selberg et al., Adv. Intell. Syst 28, 2000140 (2020). Copyright 2020 Author(s), licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 international license.

FIG. 6.

(a) A schematic of the experimental setup: H+ pump induces a pH change in solution upon an applied voltage; pH is monitored by fluorescence dye in real time; ML controller reads the fluorescence intensity, compares it with the desired [H+], and decides the applied voltage on a H+ pump to achieve the target [H+] value. (b) Temporal pH control monitored by fluorescence dye (red traces), the target (black dotted traces), and the applied voltage by using the ML controller (blue dotted traces). (c) (Left) Pulsed-control algorithm used for prolonged control of hiPSCs, in which the ML controller switches between stimulation (H+ pump on) and float (H+ pump off). (Right) The mean fluorescence intensity over the floating period was calculated (black dotted lines), and the target fluorescence intensity during stimulation is set to be two fluorescence units above that value (black solid lines). The red traces represent the fluorescence intensity of ArcLight-hiPSCs, which increases with higher Vmem induced by higher extracellular pH.58 Selberg et al., Adv. Intell. Syst 28, 2000140 (2020). Copyright 2020 Author(s), licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 international license.

Close modal

Besides bioelectronic devices with Pd/PdHx, organic polymers have also been used to control pH. Berggren et al. used PEDOT:PSS as the active material in an organic electronic ion pump to electronically control protons’ transport between two electrolytes and change pH from 7 to 3 in a few minutes.59 More recently, Miyake and co-workers used a high H+-coupling conductive polymer, sulfonated polyaniline (SPA), to modulate pH in the solution.60 In neutral pH, negatively charged sulfonate groups are covalently attached to the backbone of SPA acting as dopant anions, compensating positive charges at protonated nitrogen atoms. By applying a negative voltage to the contact, protons are absorbed in SPA and coupled with sulfonate groups and equivalent amount of e flows into SPA microelectrodes to neutralize the charge at nitrogen atoms on the SPA backbone. In Fig. 7(a), this strategy is used to control ATP synthesis by pH modulation in mitochondria. Figure 7(b) shows that ATP synthesis is more efficient at pH 7.4 compared to pH 8.3 because the proton translocation across the inner membrane at pH 7.4 is faster. The authors measured the rate of ATP synthesis in mitochondria by switching the transducer between the ON and OFF states [Fig. 7(c)], indicating an electronically controlled biological reaction. Katz’s group also reported pH control using biochemical logic gates with enzymes, such as alcohol dehydrogenase, glucose dehydrogenase, and glucose oxidase, which can change pH in solution by adjusting the chemical inputs, such as NADH, acetaldehyde, glucose, and oxygen.61,62 Different from electronically controlled pH, chemical signals used here allow bioelectronic devices to respond to physiological changes and provide the possibility for autonomous actuation.

FIG. 7.

(a) Control of ATP synthesis in mitochondria with pH modulation. (b) ATP synthesis in mitochondria in pH 7.4 and pH 8.3 buffer solutions. (c) ATP synthesis rate in mitochondria is controlled by using the pH modulator in a pH 8.3 buffer solution.60 Zhang et al. Sci. Rep. 8(1), 10423 (2018). Copyright 2018 Author(s), licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 international license.

FIG. 7.

(a) Control of ATP synthesis in mitochondria with pH modulation. (b) ATP synthesis in mitochondria in pH 7.4 and pH 8.3 buffer solutions. (c) ATP synthesis rate in mitochondria is controlled by using the pH modulator in a pH 8.3 buffer solution.60 Zhang et al. Sci. Rep. 8(1), 10423 (2018). Copyright 2018 Author(s), licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 international license.

Close modal

In this Research Update, we have summarized bioelectronic devices that are able to control [H+] and pH in solution by transferring H+ using Pd/PdHx contacts. The ability to control pH with an electronic stimulus opens up many opportunities for interfacing bioelectronics with artificial membranes with ion channels, biochemical delivery, transient biosensors, and closed-loop control of the biological environment. By adding machine learning to our devices, we are able to precisely tune pH in biological systems that, in turn, allows for unprecedented control of pH dependent biological processes such as cellular response. The expansion of these types of devices to other ions such as Ca++, Cl,63 K+, and Na+ will further expand the reach of bioelectronics into biology.

Data sharing is not applicable to this article as no new data were created or analyzed in this study.

This research was sponsored by the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA), Army Research Office, under Cooperative Agreement No. W911NF-18-2-0104, and the Department of the Interior, Award No. D20AC00003.

1.
D. J.
Blackiston
,
K. A.
McLaughlin
, and
M.
Levin
,
Cell Cycle
8
(
21
),
3527
3536
(
2009
).
2.
E.
Gouaux
and
R.
MacKinnon
,
Science
310
(
5753
),
1461
1465
(
2005
).
3.
H.
Yuk
,
B.
Lu
, and
X.
Zhao
,
Chem. Soc. Rev.
48
(
6
),
1642
1667
(
2019
).
4.
J.
Selberg
,
M.
Gomez
, and
M.
Rolandi
,
Cell Syst.
7
(
3
),
231
244
(
2018
).
5.
S.
Inal
,
J.
Rivnay
,
A.-O.
Suiu
,
G. G.
Malliaras
, and
I.
McCulloch
,
Acc. Chem. Res.
51
(
6
),
1368
1376
(
2018
).
6.
T. F.
Akbar
,
C.
Tondera
, and
I.
Minev
,
Neural Interface Engineering
(
Springer
,
2020
), pp.
237
265
.
7.
T.
Someya
,
Z.
Bao
, and
G. G.
Malliaras
,
Nature
540
(
7633
),
379
385
(
2016
).
8.
M.
Jia
and
M.
Rolandi
,
Adv. Healthcare Mater.
9
(
5
),
1901372
(
2020
).
9.
J.
Yi
,
G.
Choe
,
J.
Park
, and
J. Y.
Lee
,
Polym. J.
52
,
823
(
2020
).
10.
R.
Aversa
,
R. V.
Petrescu
,
A.
Apicella
, and
F. I.
Petrescu
,
Am. J. Biochem. Biotechnol.
13
(
1
),
34
41
(
2016
).
11.
D.
Khodagholy
,
J. N.
Gelinas
,
T.
Thesen
,
W.
Doyle
,
O.
Devinsky
,
G. G.
Malliaras
, and
G.
Buzsáki
,
Nat. Neurosci.
18
(
2
),
310
(
2015
).
12.
R.
Chen
,
A.
Canales
, and
P.
Anikeeva
,
Nat. Rev. Mater.
2
(
2
),
16093
(
2017
).
13.
J.
Leger
,
M.
Berggren
, and
S.
Carter
,
Iontronics: Ionic Carriers in Organic Electronic Materials and Devices
(
CRC Press
,
2016
).
14.
T.
Arbring Sjöström
,
M.
Berggren
,
E. O.
Gabrielsson
,
P.
Janson
,
D. J.
Poxson
,
M.
Seitanidou
, and
D. T.
Simon
,
Adv. Mater. Technol.
3
(
5
),
1700360
(
2018
).
15.
A.
Jonsson
,
Z.
Song
,
D.
Nilsson
,
B. A.
Meyerson
,
D. T.
Simon
,
B.
Linderoth
, and
M.
Berggren
,
Sci. Adv.
1
(
4
),
e1500039
(
2015
).
16.
X.
Strakosas
,
M.
Bongo
, and
R. M.
Owens
,
J. Appl. Polym. Sci.
132
(
15
),
41735
(
2015
).
17.
A. E.
Senior
,
Physiol. Rev.
68
(
1
),
177
231
(
1988
).
18.
M.
Capasso
,
T. E.
DeCoursey
, and
M. J. S.
Dyer
,
Trends Cell Biol.
21
(
1
),
20
28
(
2011
).
19.
M. A.
Bumke
,
D.
Neri
, and
G.
Elia
,
Proteomics
3
(
5
),
675
688
(
2003
).
20.
P. B.
Chase
and
M. J.
Kushmerick
,
Biophys. J.
53
(
6
),
935
946
(
1988
).
21.
G. G.
Somjen
and
G. C.
Tombaugh
,
pH and Brain Function
(
Wiley-Liss
,
1998
), pp.
373
393
.
22.
M.
Chesler
and
K.
Kaila
,
Trends Neurosci.
15
(
10
),
396
402
(
1992
).
23.
M.
Damaghi
,
J. W.
Wojtkowiak
, and
R. J.
Gillies
,
Front. Physiol.
4
,
370
(
2013
).
24.
J. A.
Wemmie
,
R. J.
Taugher
, and
C. J.
Kreple
,
Nat. Rev. Neurosci.
14
(
7
),
461
471
(
2013
).
25.
J.
Ma
and
Y.
Sahai
,
Carbohydr. Polym.
92
(
2
),
955
975
(
2013
).
26.
G.
Wu
,
J.
Zhang
,
X.
Wan
,
Y.
Yang
, and
S.
Jiang
,
J. Mater. Chem. C
2
(
31
),
6249
6255
(
2014
).
27.
D. D.
Ordinario
,
L.
Phan
,
W. G.
WalkupIV
,
J.-M.
Jocson
,
E.
Karshalev
,
N.
Hüsken
, and
A. A.
Gorodetsky
,
Nat. Chem.
6
(
7
),
596
602
(
2014
).
28.
M.
Rolandi
,
Nat. Chem.
6
(
7
),
563
564
(
2014
).
29.
J.
Selberg
,
M.
Jia
, and
M.
Rolandi
,
PLoS One
14
(
3
),
e0202713
(
2019
).
30.
N.
Agmon
,
Chem. Phys. Lett.
244
(
5-6
),
456
462
(
1995
).
31.
J. T.
Robinson
,
J. J.
Pietron
,
B.
Blue
,
F. K.
Perkins
,
E.
Josberger
,
Y.
Deng
, and
M.
Rolandi
,
J. Mater. Chem. C
5
(
42
),
11083
11091
(
2017
).
32.
T.
Miyake
,
E. E.
Josberger
,
S.
Keene
,
Y.
Deng
, and
M.
Rolandi
,
APL Mater.
3
(
1
),
014906
(
2015
).
33.
T.
Jiang
,
A.
Hall
,
M.
Eres
,
Z.
Hemmatian
,
B.
Qiao
,
Y.
Zhou
,
Z.
Ruan
,
A. D.
Couse
,
W. T.
Heller
, and
H.
Huang
,
Nature
577
(
7789
),
216
220
(
2020
).
34.
X.
Strakosas
,
J.
Selberg
,
X.
Zhang
,
N.
Christie
,
P. H.
Hsu
,
A.
Almutairi
, and
M.
Rolandi
,
Adv. Sci.
6
(
7
),
1800935
(
2019
).
35.
X.
Strakosas
,
J.
Selberg
,
P.
Pansodtee
,
N.
Yonas
,
P.
Manapongpun
,
M.
Teodorescu
, and
M.
Rolandi
,
Sci. Rep.
9
(
1
),
10844
(
2019
).
36.
M.
Jafari
,
G.
Marquez
,
J.
Selberg
,
M.
Jia
,
H.
Dechiraju
,
P.
Pansodtee
,
M.
Teodorescu
,
M.
Rolandi
, and
M.
Gomez
,
IEEE Control Syst. Lett.
5
,
1133
(
2020
).
37.
M.
Amit
,
S.
Roy
,
Y.
Deng
,
E.
Josberger
,
M.
Rolandi
, and
N.
Ashkenasy
,
ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces
10
(
2
),
1933
1938
(
2018
).
38.
C.
Gabrielli
,
P.
Grand
,
A.
Lasia
, and
H.
Perrot
,
J. Electrochem. Soc.
151
(
11
),
A1925
(
2004
).
39.
Y.-x.
Shen
,
P. O.
Saboe
,
I. T.
Sines
,
M.
Erbakan
, and
M.
Kumar
,
J. Membr. Sci.
454
,
359
381
(
2014
).
40.
Z.
Hemmatian
,
S.
Keene
,
E.
Josberger
,
T.
Miyake
,
C.
Arboleda
,
J.
Soto-Rodríguez
,
F.
Baneyx
, and
M.
Rolandi
,
Nat. Commun.
7
(
1
),
12981
(
2016
).
41.
G. A.
Woolley
and
B.
Wallace
,
J. Membr. Biol.
129
(
2
),
109
136
(
1992
).
42.
J.
Soto-Rodríguez
,
Z.
Hemmatian
,
E. E.
Josberger
,
M.
Rolandi
, and
F.
Baneyx
,
Adv. Mater.
28
(
31
),
6581
6585
(
2016
).
43.
Z.
Hemmatian
,
R. H.
Tunuguntla
,
A.
Noy
, and
M.
Rolandi
,
PLoS One
14
(
2
),
e0212197
(
2019
).
44.
R. H.
Tunuguntla
,
M. A.
Bangar
,
K.
Kim
,
P.
Stroeve
,
C.
Grigoropoulos
,
C. M.
Ajo-Franklin
, and
A.
Noy
,
Adv. Mater.
27
(
5
),
831
836
(
2015
).
45.
J.
Soto-Rodríguez
,
Z.
Hemmatian
,
J.
Black
,
M.
Rolandi
, and
F.
Baneyx
,
ACS Appl. Bio Mater.
2
(
2
),
930
935
(
2019
).
46.
R. H.
Tunuguntla
,
F. I.
Allen
,
K.
Kim
,
A.
Belliveau
, and
A.
Noy
,
Nat. Nanotechnol.
11
(
7
),
639
(
2016
).
47.
J.
Geng
,
K.
Kim
,
J.
Zhang
,
A.
Escalada
,
R.
Tunuguntla
,
L. R.
Comolli
,
F. I.
Allen
,
A. V.
Shnyrova
,
K. R.
Cho
, and
D.
Munoz
,
Nature
514
(
7524
),
612
615
(
2014
).
48.
J.
Kim
,
A. S.
Campbell
, and
J.
Wang
,
Talanta
177
,
163
170
(
2018
).
49.
W.
Gao
,
S.
Emaminejad
,
H. Y. Y.
Nyein
,
S.
Challa
,
K.
Chen
,
A.
Peck
,
H. M.
Fahad
,
H.
Ota
,
H.
Shiraki
, and
D.
Kiriya
,
Nature
529
(
7587
),
509
514
(
2016
).
50.
H.
Zhu
,
L.
Li
,
W.
Zhou
,
Z.
Shao
, and
X.
Chen
,
J. Mater. Chem. B
4
(
46
),
7333
7349
(
2016
).
51.
P.
Bollella
,
G.
Fusco
,
C.
Tortolini
,
G.
Sanzò
,
G.
Favero
,
L.
Gorton
, and
R.
Antiochia
,
Biosens. Bioelectron.
89
,
152
166
(
2017
).
52.
B. A.
Webb
,
M.
Chimenti
,
M. P.
Jacobson
, and
D. L.
Barber
,
Nat. Rev. Cancer
11
(
9
),
671
677
(
2011
).
53.
Y.
Kato
,
S.
Ozawa
,
C.
Miyamoto
,
Y.
Maehata
,
A.
Suzuki
,
T.
Maeda
, and
Y.
Baba
,
Cancer Cell Int.
13
(
1
),
89
(
2013
).
54.
Y.
Deng
,
T.
Miyake
,
S.
Keene
,
E. E.
Josberger
, and
M.
Rolandi
,
Sci. Rep.
6
,
24080
(
2016
).
55.
P.
DeMuth
,
M.
Hurley
,
C.
Wu
,
S.
Galanie
,
M. R.
Zachariah
, and
P.
DeShong
,
Microporous Mesoporous Mater.
141
(
1-3
),
128
134
(
2011
).
56.
Z.
Hemmatian
,
E.
Jalilian
,
S.
Lee
,
X.
Strakosas
,
A.
Khademhosseini
,
A.
Almutairi
,
S. R.
Shin
, and
M.
Rolandi
,
ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces
10
(
26
),
21782
21787
(
2018
).
57.
C.
Cosentino
and
D.
Bates
,
Feedback Control in Systems Biology
(
CRC Press
,
2011
).
58.
J.
Selberg
,
M.
Jafari
,
J.
Mathews
,
M.
Jia
,
P.
Pansodtee
,
H.
Dechiraju
,
C.
Wu
,
S.
Cordero
,
A.
Flora
, and
N.
Yonas
,
Adv. Intell. Syst.
28
,
2000140
(
2020
).
59.
J.
Isaksson
,
D.
Nilsson
,
P.
Kjäll
,
N. D.
Robinson
,
A.
Richter-Dahlfors
, and
M.
Berggren
,
Org. Electron.
9
(
3
),
303
309
(
2008
).
60.
Z.
Zhang
,
H.
Kashiwagi
,
S.
Kimura
,
S.
Kong
,
Y.
Ohta
, and
T.
Miyake
,
Sci. Rep.
8
(
1
),
10423
(
2018
).
61.
E.
Katz
,
Isr. J. Chem.
51
(
1
),
132
140
(
2011
).
62.
M.
Privman
,
T. K.
Tam
,
M.
Pita
, and
E.
Katz
,
J. Am. Chem. Soc.
131
(
3
),
1314
1321
(
2009
).
63.
M.
Jia
,
H.
Dechiruji
,
J.
Selberg
,
P.
Pansodtee
,
J.
Mathews
,
C.
Wu
,
M.
Levin
,
M.
Teodorescu
, and
M.
Rolandi
,
APL Mater.
8
(
9
),
091106
(
2020
).