We report a fully transparent thin-film transistor utilizing a La-doped BaSnO3 channel layer that provides a drain current of 0.468 mA/μm and an on-off ratio of 1.5 × 108. The La-doped BaSnO3 channel is grown on a 100–150 nm thick unintentionally doped BaSnO3 buffer layer on a (001) MgO substrate by molecular-beam epitaxy. Unpatterned channel layers show mobilities of 127–184 cm2 V−1 s−1 at carrier concentrations in the low to mid 1019 cm−3 range. The BaSnO3 is patterned by reactive ion etching under conditions preserving the high mobility and conductivity. Using this patterning method, a sub-micron-scale thin film transistor exhibiting complete depletion at room temperature is achieved.

Transparent oxide thin-film transistors (TFTs) have been studied extensively for over a decade for applications that include displays, wearable electronics, and smart windows.1–3 Due to the relatively high mobilities of the transparent oxide semiconductors used, when scaled to small dimensions, transparent oxide TFTs are expected to have high drain current (ID, drain-to-source current per channel width) and low power consumption, which are important for energy-sensitive applications. Tin-based oxide systems are promising materials for transparent oxide TFTs due to the superior oxygen stability and high mobility of these materials at room temperature.4,5 Among stannates, the transparent perovskite BaSnO3 is attracting worldwide attention following the recent discovery that La-doped BaSnO3 has both high mobility at room temperature and excellent oxygen stability. Mobilities as high as 320 cm2 V−1 s−1 and 183 cm2 V−1 s−1 have been achieved in La-doped BaSnO3 single crystals4 and epitaxial thin films,6 respectively, at room temperature. The high mobility of BaSnO3 is attributed to the small effective mass originating from the large dispersion of the conduction band from the Sn 5s orbital,7 high dielectric constant (K ≈ 20)8 which reduces dopant scattering,4 and small phonon scattering.9 

The performance of TFTs based on BaSnO3 has been steadily improving in recent years, with the highest ID achieved being 0.021 mA/μm.10 This performance is limited by the large size of the BaSnO3-based TFTs, which have channel dimensions of 100–200 μm. These large devices have been patterned using metal shadow masks during growth, i.e., without photolithography. Attempts to use photolithography to define smaller devices have been plagued by the creation of oxygen vacancies in the BaSnO3 film, including the undoped BaSnO3 buffer layer, during the ion-milling process. These vacancies make the undoped BaSnO3 buffer layer conductive, shunt the device, and degrade performance.11 This problem is well known in other oxides as well.12 

Here, we report growth of high mobility La-doped BaSnO3 thin films on MgO substrates using molecular-beam epitaxy and use reactive ion etching (RIE) to pattern BaSnO3–based TFTs. With appropriate conditions, this etching technique enables BaSnO3 to be etched with a controllable etch rate while preserving surface roughness and electrical properties including conductivity and mobility. The resulting micrometer-scale photolithography defined BaSnO3–based transparent TFT has a peak field-effect mobility of 17.2 cm2/V−1 s−1, an on-off ratio over 1.5 × 108, ID over 0.468 mA/μm, and a peak transconductance (gm) of 30.5 mS/mm. As we describe below, this is one of the highest performance fully transparent oxide TFTs ever reported.

Epitaxial La-doped BaSnO3 films were grown on (001) MgO substrates by adsorption-controlled growth using molecular-beam epitaxy with barium, lanthanum, and SnO2 sources. The details of the growth process are given elsewhere.6 Epitaxial growth of single-phase La-doped BaSnO3 on MgO substrates was confirmed by x-ray diffraction (XRD) measurements; the full width at half maximum of the BaSnO3 002 peak is 0.31° (see Fig. S1 of the supplementary material). MgO substrates, with a bandgap of about 7.8 eV,13 are used to avoid the potential complications of persistent photoconductivity from the substrate arising from light exposure during the photolithography process.14 On the MgO substrate, an undoped BaSnO3 layer followed by a La-doped BaSnO3 layer is grown to form the channel of the TFT as is typical for BaSnO3-based TFTs.10,15–19 The purpose of the undoped BaSnO3 layer is to reduce the density of threading dislocations that propagate into the overlying doped (and conducting) BaSnO3. Even with such a buffer layer, the threading dislocation density of BaSnO3 films grown on MgO as well as other commonly used substrates is of order 1011 cm−2;6,15,20 an ideal substrate for BaSnO3 has yet to be demonstrated, but several lattice matched candidates are being developed.21–23 

The heterostructures for TFTs fabrication consist of a 100–150 nm thick unintentionally doped BaSnO3 buffer layer followed by about 10 nm of La-doped BaSnO3. In test structures, the Hall mobility of a 10-nm-thick La-doped BaSnO3 layer (grown on an MgO substrate with an undoped BaSnO3 buffer layer) reaches 184 cm2 V−1 s−1 at a carrier concentration of 6.5 × 1019 cm−3. Despite the thin La-doped BaSnO3 film and the use of a nonperovskite MgO substrate, this value is the highest mobility reported for BaSnO3 thin films; it is slightly higher than the previous record achieved on a DyScO3 substrate.6 The Hall mobility of a 10-nm thick La-doped BaSnO3 layer (on a 150 nm thick undoped BaSnO3 buffer layer) with a carrier concentration of 1.3 × 1019 cm−3 is over 90 cm2 V−1 s−1. This decrease in mobility as the carrier concentration in La-doped BaSnO3 is reduced below about 7 × 1019 cm−3 is typical of BaSnO3 films6,15,20 and is a result of scattering from the huge density of threading dislocations, which become less effectively screened from the mobile charge carriers as the carrier concentration is reduced.4,20 The mobility, limited by the threading dislocations, is given by24,25
where
and e, c, Z, Ntd, n, ε, and m* are the electron charge, c-axis lattice parameter, charge state of a unit cell in a threading dislocation, density of threading dislocations, carrier concentration, dielectric permittivity, and effective mass, respectively. The fitting parameters are given in the supplementary material. The fitting achieved using this formula is overall in good agreement with the experimental data (see Fig. S6 of the supplementary material). The mobilities of our La-doped BaSnO3 films on MgO are the highest yet reported at the relatively low carrier concentrations and low thickness of La-doped BaSnO3 layers,4,15,26,27 which are needed to be able to fully deplete the TFT channel when a voltage is applied to the gate.

In order to make micrometer scale TFTs, it is critical to be able to lithographically pattern the high mobility La-doped BaSnO3 channel layer without degrading its electrical performance. A few methods have been used in the past to pattern a La-doped BaSnO3 channel layer. Early BaSnO3 TFTs used shadow masks to define the channel structure during deposition.10,15–19 This method can pattern the La-doped BaSnO3 layer without degrading its surface roughness and electrical properties, but the channel length is limited to about 100 μm. More recently ion-milling has been employed to pattern the La-doped BaSnO3 layer. Although ion-milling can etch La-doped BaSnO3 to micrometer scale dimensions with controllable etch rate, the size of the channel length reported was about 100 μm.11 Importantly, the resulting BaSnO3 TFT with an undoped BaSnO3 layer could not be depleted at room temperature and its on-off ratio was only 2. The reason for the inability to deplete the TFT at room temperature was attributed to significant charge trapping,11 but our own experiments reveal that undoped BaSnO3 becomes conductive when subjected to ion-milling. The conductivity of an undoped BaSnO3 layer increased more than 108 times following ion-milling even when we use the smallest available acceleration voltage of our equipment, 400 V. Such an enhancement in conductivity of the undoped BaSnO3 layer is consistent with it is being caused by the creation of oxygen vacancies from the high energy bombardment of Ar ions during the ion-milling process, as has been reported for SrTiO3.12 

The undesired conductance enhancement in unintentionally doped BaSnO3 resulting from ion-milling can be reduced by annealing the sample in flowing oxygen at temperatures of about 800 °C, but even after such aggressive annealing, the conductance does not fully return to its original state. The effect of annealing on ion-milled undoped BaSnO3 in flowing O2 at temperatures from 300 °C to 800 °C is given in the supplementary material (see Fig. S7 of the supplementary material). Therefore, we believe that the conductance of the underlying undoped BaSnO3 buffer layer caused by the ion-milling process is partially responsible for the poor room-temperature performance of the prior BaSnO3-based TFT device subjected to ion-milling.11 Ion-milling can also alter film stoichiometry and lead to charge trapping from defects along the side walls. For this reason, we have developed an alternate etching process to pattern the BaSnO3 layers into a TFT.

In order to overcome the limitations of previous techniques used to define BaSnO3-based TFTs, we employ reactive-ion etching (RIE) using chlorine and argon gases to etch the BaSnO3 epitaxial stack. By using a reactive gas such as chlorine, the RIE technique can etch a BaSnO3 film with a chemical process rather than a purely physical process, in contrast to ion-milling. Under appropriate conditions, the undoped BaSnO3 film conductivity issue that we ascribe to the creation of oxygen vacancies can be resolved. Furthermore, with RIE, we are able to achieve a controllable etch rate that is not dependent on sample quality. In short, our RIE etching process for BaSnO3 provides a controllable etch rate while preserving surface roughness and electrical properties including conductivity and mobility—qualities critical to the fabrication of high-performance TFTs. BCl3 gas can also be used for RIE etching of BaSnO3 while preserving surface roughness and electrical properties including conductivity and mobility, but the etch rate is lower than when chlorine gas is used. Therefore, using chlorine gas without adding BCl3 gas is preferable. A higher etch rate is desirable to reduce etch time, but there is a trade-off between the etch rate and damage to the BaSnO3 film. In making the TFTs, the etch rate has been maximized without damaging the properties of the BaSnO3 film by adjusting RIE etching parameters. The RF power of the RIE is around 80–120 W with a DC voltage in the 200–250 V range. The total gas pressure is around 1–2 mTorr, and a gas ratio between 1:5 and 5:1 is used for the Cl2 and Ar gases.28 

The device patterning and fabrication process was completed in the cleanroom environment of Cornell’s NanoScale Science and Technology Facility (CNF), except for the atomic layer deposition (ALD) process. For light exposure during photolithography, an Autostep 200 stepper was used. The channel layer was etched using a PT720/740 RIE etching tool. For device isolation, the channel layer was etched down about 18 nm, considerably beyond the 10 nm thickness of the La-doped BaSnO3 top layer and well into the undoped BaSnO3 buffer layer. After the etching process, indium tin oxide (ITO) was deposited as source and drain contacts using a PVD75 sputtering tool. The source and drain contacts were patterned by lift-off. A blanket HfO2 gate dielectric layer was then deposited over the full structure by atomic-layer deposition (ALD), at 300 °C with ozone as an oxidant, which leads to have a deposition rate of 0.8 Å/cycle. The thickness of the HfO2 layer was 20 nm. To complete the TFT, ITO was deposited again on the gate dielectric to form the gate electrode using the same sputtering tool as used earlier in the process. The gate contact was also patterned by lift-off. Electrical measurements were performed using a Cascade probe station with a Keithley 4200 SCS system. All device measurements presented were measured at room temperature in ambient air.

Figure 1 shows a schematic of the BaSnO3–based TFT measured in Figs. 2 and 3, together with a scanning electron microscope image of the fully patterned device. The mobility and carrier concentration of the as-grown La-doped BaSnO3 channel layer in this sample are μ = 65.2 cm2 V−1 s−1 and n = 1.81 × 1019 cm−3, respectively, from Hall measurements at room temperature. The channel length and width of the TFT are L = 0.3 μm and W = 0.93 μm, respectively. This is the smallest BaSnO3–based TFT yet reported.10,11,15–19 Further scaling is limited by the resolution of the light exposing tool.

FIG. 1.

Schematic and scanning electron microscope image of the BaSnO3 TFT device. The channel is 0.3 μm long and 0.93 μm wide.

FIG. 1.

Schematic and scanning electron microscope image of the BaSnO3 TFT device. The channel is 0.3 μm long and 0.93 μm wide.

Close modal
FIG. 2.

(a) The transfer characteristic of the TFT based on La-doped BaSnO3 at VDS = 1 V and the field-effect mobility. The peak field-effect mobility is 17.2 cm2 V−1 s−1, and the on-off ratio is over 1.5 × 108. The subthreshold swing is 0.15 V dec−1. (b) Transconductance of the device at VDS = 1 V. The maximum transconductance is 30.5 mS/mm. (c) The output characteristic of the device at VGS = 2, 1, 0, −1, −2, −3, −4, −5, −6, −7 V. The maximum drain current exceeds 0.467 mA/μm.

FIG. 2.

(a) The transfer characteristic of the TFT based on La-doped BaSnO3 at VDS = 1 V and the field-effect mobility. The peak field-effect mobility is 17.2 cm2 V−1 s−1, and the on-off ratio is over 1.5 × 108. The subthreshold swing is 0.15 V dec−1. (b) Transconductance of the device at VDS = 1 V. The maximum transconductance is 30.5 mS/mm. (c) The output characteristic of the device at VGS = 2, 1, 0, −1, −2, −3, −4, −5, −6, −7 V. The maximum drain current exceeds 0.467 mA/μm.

Close modal
FIG. 3.

Drain current dependence on channel length (Lch) when VGS = 2 V and VDS = 5 V. The drain current (ID) is inversely proportional to the overall channel length except at the shortest channel length, showing little degradation with respect to device scaling. The deviation from linear behavior in the inset at the shortest channel length is likely due to the contact resistance and not short channel effects such as velocity saturation.

FIG. 3.

Drain current dependence on channel length (Lch) when VGS = 2 V and VDS = 5 V. The drain current (ID) is inversely proportional to the overall channel length except at the shortest channel length, showing little degradation with respect to device scaling. The deviation from linear behavior in the inset at the shortest channel length is likely due to the contact resistance and not short channel effects such as velocity saturation.

Close modal

The characteristic curves of the BaSnO3 TFT are shown in Fig. 2. Figure 2(a) shows the transfer characteristic of the device: ID vs VGS (gate-to-source voltage) and μFE (field-effect mobility) vs VGS. As shown in Fig. 2(a), the TFT can be depleted completely at room temperature—a first for a photolithographically defined BaSnO3-based TFT.11 The field-effect mobility of the device is calculated from the relation μFE=LCoxWVDSIDSVGS.30, IDS, L, Cox, and W are the drain-to-source current, the channel length, the capacitance of the gate dielectric per unit area, and the channel width, respectively. The capacitance of the HfO2 gate dielectric was measured as shown in Fig. S9 of the supplementary material with a metal-oxide semiconductor (MOS) structure with dimensions 50 μm × 50 μm. This MOS capacitor has the same La-doped BaSnO3 channel layer and the same ITO gate electrode as the TFT, i.e., the layers measured in the MOS capacitor were deposited on the MgO wafer and patterned into the MOS capacitor test structure and into the TFT. For calculating μFE, the maximum Cox at the given voltage range has been used so as to not overestimate μFE. The calculated μFE is 17.2 cm2 V−1 s−1. The large difference between the field-effect mobility and the Hall mobility can be attributed to the contact resistance. The contact resistance includes the sheet resistance of the ITO contact layer and interface resistance between the ITO contact layer and the La-doped BaSnO3 channel layer. In the supplementary material (see Fig. S10), we utilize the measured value of the contact resistance to calculate the field-effect mobility; the result is 72 cm2 V−1 s−1, which is comparable to the Hall mobility of the as-grown channel layer. From the details of this calculation, it is clear that the high contact resistance is significantly limiting the TFT performance; a lower resistance contact will increase the field-effect mobility and thus the drain current. There is dispersion in the capacitance at measurement frequencies higher than 100 kHz, and it is believed to be related to the trapping of charge by defects or impurities within the HfO2 film and at the interface between the HfO2 and La-doped BaSnO3 channel layer since the cutoff frequency is 51.6 MHz. The cutoff frequency is calculated from the relation f=12πRC and is much higher than 100 kHz. The on-off ratio is over 1.5 × 108. This is the highest on-off ratio among BaSnO3 TFTs when an undoped BaSnO3 buffer layer is used.10,11,15–18 The subthreshold swing has been calculated from the equation S= log IDSVGS1, and S is 0.15 V dec−1. Figure 2(b) shows the transconductance of the device at VDS = 1 V as a function of VGS. The transconductance is calculated from the relation gm=IDSVGS. The maximum transconductance is 30.5 mS/mm at VDS = 1 V. This is much higher than the previous record transconductance in a BaSnO3 based TFT, which is only 2 mS/mm.11  Figure 2(c) shows the output characteristic of the device, which is ID vs VDS (drain-to-source voltage) by varying VGS from 2 to −7 V. As shown in Fig. 2(c), the drain current reaches over 0.468 mA/μm. The slow increase in the drain current with respect to VDS is attributed to the high contact resistance. The resistance of the ITO/La-doped BaSnO3/ITO channel structure vs channel length is plotted in Fig. S10 of the supplementary material. The source/drain contact resistance between the ITO contact layer and the La-doped BaSnO3 channel layer, which is 5.1 kΩ μm, is calculated by extrapolating a linear fit to the plot. The high contact resistance affects the slow response of ID vs VDS in the measured output characteristics as shown in Fig. S11 of the supplementary material; thus, the drain current can be improved by lowering the contact resistance.

The drain current vs channel length at VGS = 2 V and VDS = 5 V is plotted in Fig. 3. The drain current is inversely proportional to the overall length of the channel except at the shortest channel length of 0.3 μm, showing little degradation with respect to device scaling. The close agreement between the calculated field-effect mobility (with the effect of contact resistance included) and Hall mobility indicates that the deviation from linear behavior at the short channel length of 0.3 μm in the inset of Fig. 3 is likely due to the contact resistance and not short channel effects such as velocity saturation. At a channel length of 0.3 μm, the channel resistance is comparable to the contact resistance and the effective voltage applied to the channel is greatly diminished, lowering drain current. A lower resistance contact is expected to reduce the deviation evident in Fig. S11 (a) between the ideal square-law transistor model and actual TFT performance.

The interface trap charge density Dit can be calculated using31 
where k, T, and e are the Boltzmann constant, temperature, and electron charge, respectively. The calculated Dit is 5.03×1012 eV−1 cm−2.

A comparison of the drain current vs on-off ratio among transparent oxide channel TFTs is shown in Fig. 4.3,5,10,15–19,32–57 The high ID of the highest performance TFT with a transparent oxide channel was achieved on cleaved and transferred flakes of β-Ga2O3 onto an opaque substrate;48 this is not a scalable technology. These data are indicated as gray marks. Our BaSnO3-based TFT exhibits one of the best performances of all transparent oxide TFTs and is comparable to the best TFTs made with transparent oxide channel materials (in device structures in which other elements are not transparent). Its drain current is second best among all fully transparent scalable oxide channel TFTs.57 

FIG. 4.

Comparison of drain current in TFTs with transparent oxide channels with respect to the on/off current ratio. The drain current of the BaSnO3 TFT described in this article is the highest value among all transparent oxide channel field-effect transistors. The solid symbols represent enhancement-mode TFT devices, and the hollow symbols represent depletion-mode TFT devices. The top right corner is the desired corner of the plot for the best TFT performance.

FIG. 4.

Comparison of drain current in TFTs with transparent oxide channels with respect to the on/off current ratio. The drain current of the BaSnO3 TFT described in this article is the highest value among all transparent oxide channel field-effect transistors. The solid symbols represent enhancement-mode TFT devices, and the hollow symbols represent depletion-mode TFT devices. The top right corner is the desired corner of the plot for the best TFT performance.

Close modal

In summary, a fully transparent submicron TFT based on BaSnO3 has been fabricated with a high drain current and on/off current ratio. This breakthrough is made possible by (1) high mobility bare films in combination with (2) the development of a micrometer-scale etching method that preserves the surface roughness, conductivity, and mobility of BaSnO3 films. These results demonstrate the tremendous potential of BaSnO3 for the future of transparent electronics.

See the supplementary material for further data and discussion of the structural and electrical properties. This includes X-ray diffraction θ-2θ and ϕ-scans, a reflection high-energy electron diffraction (RHEED) intensity oscillation during the growth of a BaSnO3 thin film, a reciprocal space map (RSM) of a BaSnO3 thin film, atomic force microscope (AFM) images of the surface of a La-BaSnO3 film before and after etching in dilute nitric acid, a plot of mobility vs carrier concentration for the La-BaSnO3/undoped BaSnO3/MgO heterostructures, a comparison of the 2-probe resistance of RIE-etched BaSnO3 and ion-milled BaSnO3 films following post annealing in flowing O2, the band diagram of the BaSnO3-based TFT device fabricated with a HfO2 gate dielectric and an ITO gate contact, the capacitance vs VGS characteristics of an MOS ITO/ALD-grown HfO2/La-BaSnO3 capacitor, extraction of the contact resistance from the ITO/La-doped BaSnO3/ITO channel structure, analysis of the field-effect mobility that includes the high contact resistance, and a simulation of the ideal output characteristics of the BaSnO3-based FET.

This material is based on work supported by the Air Force Office of Scientific Research under Award No. FA9550-16-1-0192 and from ASCENT, one of six centers in JUMP, a Semiconductor Research Corporation (SRC) program sponsored by DARPA. H.P. acknowledges support from the National Science Foundation [Platform for the Accelerated Realization, Analysis, and Discovery of Interface Materials (PARADIM)] under Cooperative Agreement No. DMR-1539918. Substrate preparation was performed in part at the Cornell NanoScale Facility, a member of the National Nanotechnology Coordinated Infrastructure (NNCI), which is supported by the National Science Foundation (NSF, Grant No. ECCS-1542081). Material characterization made use of the shared facilities supported by NSF Grant No. MRI-1338010.

1.
G.
Thomas
,
Nature
389
,
907
908
(
1997
).
2.
R. L.
Hoffman
,
B. J.
Norris
, and
J. F.
Wager
,
Appl. Phys. Lett.
82
,
733
735
(
2003
).
3.
K.
Nomura
,
H.
Ohta
,
K.
Ueda
,
T.
Kamiya
,
M.
Hirano
, and
H.
Hosono
,
Science
300
,
1269
1272
(
2003
).
4.
H. J.
Kim
,
U.
Kim
,
H. M.
Kim
,
T. H.
Kim
,
H. S.
Mun
,
B.-G.
Jeon
,
K. T.
Hong
,
W.-J.
Lee
,
C.
Ju
,
K. H.
Kim
, and
K.
Char
,
Appl. Phys. Express
5
,
061102
(
2012
).
5.
C.
Ju
,
C.
Park
,
H.
Yang
,
U.
Kim
,
Y. M.
Kim
, and
K.
Char
,
Curr. Appl. Phys.
16
,
300
304
(
2016
).
6.
H.
Paik
,
Z.
Chen
,
E.
Lochocki
,
A. H.
Seidner
,
A.
Verma
,
N.
Tanen
,
J.
Park
,
M.
Uchida
,
S.
Shang
,
B.-C.
Zhou
,
M.
Brützam
,
R.
Uecker
,
Z.-K.
Liu
,
D.
Jena
,
K. M.
Shen
,
D. A.
Muller
, and
D. G.
Schlom
,
APL Mater.
5
,
116107
(
2017
).
7.
H.
Mizoguchi
,
H. W.
Eng
, and
P. M.
Woodward
,
Inorg. Chem.
43
,
1667
1680
(
2004
).
8.
P.
Singh
,
B. J.
Brandenburg
,
C. P.
Sebastian
,
P.
Singh
,
S.
Singh
,
D.
Kumar
, and
O.
Parkash
,
Jpn. J. Appl. Phys., Part 1
47
,
3540
3545
(
2008
).
9.
K.
Krishnaswamy
,
B.
Himmetoglu
,
Y.
Kang
,
A.
Janotti
, and
C. G.
Van de Walle
,
Phys. Rev. B
95
,
205202
(
2017
).
10.
U.
Kim
,
C.
Park
,
T.
Ha
,
Y. M.
Kim
,
N.
Kim
,
C.
Ju
,
J.
Park
,
J.
You
,
J. H.
Kim
, and
K.
Char
,
APL Mater.
3
,
036101
(
2015
).
11.
J.
Yue
,
A.
Prakash
,
M. C.
Robbins
,
S. J.
Koester
, and
B.
Jalan
,
ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces
10
,
21061
21065
(
2018
).
12.
C. W.
Schneider
,
S.
Thiel
,
G.
Hammerl
,
C.
Richter
, and
J.
Mannhart
,
Appl. Phys. Lett.
89
,
122101
(
2006
).
13.
D. M.
Roessler
and
W. C.
Walker
,
Phys. Rev.
159
,
733
738
(
1967
).
14.
J.
Park
,
U.
Kim
, and
K.
Char
,
Appl. Phys. Lett.
108
,
092106
(
2016
).
15.
J.
Shin
,
Y. M.
Kim
,
Y.
Kim
,
C.
Park
, and
K.
Char
,
Appl. Phys. Lett.
109
,
262102
(
2016
).
16.
C.
Park
,
U.
Kim
,
C. J.
Ju
,
J. S.
Park
,
Y. M.
Kim
, and
K.
Char
,
Appl. Phys. Lett.
105
,
203503
(
2014
).
17.
Y. M.
Kim
,
C.
Park
,
T.
Ha
,
U.
Kim
,
N.
Kim
,
J.
Shin
,
Y.
Kim
,
J.
Yu
,
J. H.
Kim
, and
K.
Char
,
APL Mater.
5
,
016104
(
2017
).
18.
Y. M.
Kim
,
C.
Park
,
U.
Kim
,
C.
Ju
, and
K.
Char
,
Appl. Phys. Express
9
,
011201
(
2016
).
19.
Y.
Kim
,
Y. M.
Kim
,
J.
Shin
, and
K.
Char
,
APL Mater.
6
,
096104
(
2018
).
20.
H.
Mun
,
U.
Kim
,
H. M.
Kim
,
C.
Park
,
T. H.
Kim
,
H. J.
Kim
,
K. H.
Kim
, and
K.
Char
,
Appl. Phys. Lett.
102
,
252105
(
2013
).
21.
R.
Uecker
,
R.
Bertram
,
M.
Brützam
,
Z.
Galazka
,
T. M.
Gesing
,
C.
Guguschev
,
D.
Klimm
,
M.
Klupsch
,
A.
Kwasniewski
, and
D. G.
Schlom
,
J. Cryst. Growth
457
,
137
142
(
2017
).
22.
C.
Guguschev
,
D.
Klimm
,
M.
Brützam
,
T. M.
Gesing
,
M.
Gogolin
,
H.
Paik
,
A.
Dittmar
,
V. J.
Fratello
, and
D. G.
Schlom
,
J. Cryst. Growth
528
,
125263
(
2019
).
23.
C.
Guguschev
,
D.
Klimm
,
M.
Brützam
,
T. M.
Gesing
,
M.
Gogolin
,
H.
Paik
,
T.
Markurt
,
D. J.
Kok
,
A.
Kwasniewski
,
U.
Jendritzki
, and
D. G.
Schlom
, “
Czochralski growth and characterization of perovskite-type (La, Nd)(Lu, Sc)O3 single crystals with a pseudocubic lattice parameter of 4.086 Å
,”
J. Cryst. Growth
(submitted).
24.
D. C.
Look
,
C. E.
Stutz
,
R. J.
Molnar
,
K.
Saarinen
, and
Z.
Liliental-Weber
,
Solid State Commun.
117
,
571
575
(
2001
).
25.
U.
Kim
, Ph.D. thesis,
Seoul National University
,
2015
.
26.
S.
Raghavan
,
T.
Schumann
,
H.
Kim
,
J. Y.
Zhang
,
T. A.
Cain
, and
S.
Stemmer
,
APL Mater.
4
,
016106
(
2016
).
27.
A.
Prakash
,
P.
Xu
,
A.
Faghaninia
,
S.
Shukla
,
J. W.
Ager
III
,
C. S.
Lo
, and
B.
Jalan
,
Nat. Commun.
8
,
15167
(
2017
).
28.
J.
Park
, U.S. patent application 1126-051 (filed,
December 6 2019
).
29.
J.
Park
, U.S. patent application 1126-052 (filed,
December 6 2019
).
30.
E.
Fortunato
,
P.
Barquinha
, and
R.
Martins
,
Adv. Mater.
24
,
2945
2986
(
2012
).
31.
W. L.
Kalb
and
B.
Batlogg
,
Phys. Rev. B
81
,
035327
(
2010
).
32.
P. F.
Carcia
,
R. S.
McLean
,
M. H.
Reilly
, and
G.
Nunes
, Jr.
,
Appl. Phys. Lett.
82
,
1117
1119
(
2003
).
33.
H.-H.
Hsieh
and
C.-C.
Wu
,
Appl. Phys. Lett.
89
,
041109
(
2006
).
34.
B.
Bayraktaroglu
,
K.
Leedy
, and
R.
Neidhard
,
IEEE Electron Device Lett.
30
,
946
948
(
2009
).
35.
B.-Y.
Oh
,
Y.-H.
Kim
,
H.-J.
Lee
,
B.-Y.
Kim
,
H.-G.
Park
,
J.-W.
Han
,
G.-S.
Heo
,
T.-W.
Kim
,
K.-Y.
Kim
, and
D.-S.
Seo
,
Semicond. Sci. Technol.
26
,
085007
(
2011
).
36.
K.
Nomura
,
H.
Ohta
,
A.
Takagi
,
T.
Kamiya
,
M.
Hirano
, and
H.
Hosono
,
Nature
432
,
488
492
(
2004
).
37.
R.
Yao
,
Z.
Zheng
,
M.
Xiong
,
X.
Zhang
,
X.
Li
,
H.
Ning
,
Z.
Fang
,
W.
Xie
,
X.
Lu
, and
J.
Peng
,
Appl. Phys. Lett.
112
,
103503
(
2018
).
38.
N. C.
Su
,
S. J.
Wang
, and
A.
Chin
,
IEEE Electron Device Lett.
30
,
1317
1319
(
2009
).
39.
I.
Noviyana
,
A. D.
Lestari
,
M.
Putri
,
M.-S.
Won
,
J.-S.
Bae
,
Y.-W.
Heo
, and
H. Y.
Lee
,
Materials
10
,
702
(
2017
).
40.
S.
Tomai
,
M.
Nishimura
,
M.
Itose
,
M.
Matuura
,
M.
Kasami
,
S.
Matsuzaki
,
H.
Kawashima
,
F.
Utsuno
, and
K.
Yano
,
Jpn. J. Appl. Phys.
51
,
03CB01
(
2012
).
41.
R.
Jany
,
C.
Richter
,
C.
Woltmann
,
G.
Pfanzelt
,
B.
Förg
,
M.
Rommel
,
T.
Reindl
,
U.
Waizmann
,
J.
Weis
,
J. A.
Mundy
,
D. A.
Muller
,
H.
Boschker
, and
J.
Mannhart
,
Adv. Mater. Interfaces
1
,
1300031
(
2014
).
42.
L.
Dong
,
Y. Q.
Liu
,
M.
Xu
,
Y. Q.
Wu
,
R.
Colby
,
E. A.
Stach
,
R.
Droopad
,
R. G.
Gordon
, and
P. D.
Ye
, in
Proceedings of IEEE International Electron Devices Meeting
(
IEEE
,
2010
), pp.
26.4.1
26.4.4
.
43.
H.
Zhou
,
K.
Maize
,
G.
Qiu
,
A.
Shakouri
, and
P. D.
Ye
,
Appl. Phys. Lett.
111
,
092102
(
2017
).
44.
A. J.
Green
,
K. D.
Chabak
,
M.
Baldini
,
N.
Moser
,
R.
Gilbert
,
R. C.
Fitch
,
G.
Wagner
,
Z.
Galazka
,
J.
McCandless
,
A.
Crespo
,
K.
Leedy
, and
G. H.
Jessen
,
IEEE Electron Device Lett.
38
,
790
793
(
2017
).
45.
Z.
Xia
,
C.
Joishi
,
S.
Krishnamoorthy
,
S.
Bajaj
,
Y.
Zhang
,
M.
Brenner
,
S.
Lodha
, and
S.
Rajan
,
IEEE Electron Device Lett.
39
,
568
571
(
2018
).
46.
N.
Moser
,
J.
McCandless
,
A.
Crespo
,
K.
Leedy
,
A.
Green
,
A.
Neal
,
S.
Mou
,
E.
Ahmadi
,
J.
Speck
,
K.
Chabak
,
N.
Peixoto
, and
G.
Jessen
,
IEEE Electron Device Lett.
38
,
775
778
(
2017
).
47.
K. D.
Chabak
,
J. P.
McCandless
,
N. A.
Moser
,
A. J.
Green
,
K.
Mahalingam
,
A.
Crespo
,
N.
Hendricks
,
B. M.
Howe
,
S. E.
Tetlak
,
K.
Leedy
,
R. C.
Fitch
,
D.
Wakimoto
,
K.
Sasaki
,
A.
Kuramata
, and
G. H.
Jessen
,
IEEE Electron Device Lett.
39
,
67
70
(
2018
).
48.
H.
Zhou
,
K.
Maize
,
J.
Noh
,
A.
Shakouri
, and
P. D.
Ye
,
ACS Omega
2
,
7723
7729
(
2017
).
49.
R. E.
Presley
,
C. L.
Munsee
,
C.-H.
Park
,
D.
Hong
,
J. F.
Wager
, and
D. A.
Keszler
,
J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys.
37
,
2810
2813
(
2004
).
50.
Z.
Yuan
,
X.
Zhu
,
X.
Wang
,
X.
Cai
,
B.
Zhang
,
D.
Qiu
, and
H.
Wu
,
Thin Solid Films
519
,
3254
3258
(
2011
).
51.
P. K.
Nayak
,
M. N.
Hedhili
,
D.
Cha
, and
H. N.
Alshareef
,
Appl. Phys. Lett.
103
,
033518
(
2013
).
52.
N.
Mitoma
,
S.
Aikawa
,
X.
Gao
,
T.
Kizu
,
M.
Shimizu
,
M.-F.
Lin
,
T.
Nabatame
, and
K.
Tsukagoshi
,
Appl. Phys. Lett.
104
,
102103
(
2014
).
53.
L.
Wang
,
M.-H.
Yoon
,
G.
Lu
,
Y.
Yang
,
A.
Facchetti
, and
T. J.
Marks
,
Nat. Mater.
5
,
893
900
(
2006
).
54.
B.
Bayraktaroglu
,
K.
Leedy
, and
R.
Neidhard
,
IEEE Electron Device Lett.
29
,
1024
1026
(
2008
).
55.
N. A.
Moser
,
J. P.
McCandless
,
A.
Crespo
,
K. D.
Leedy
,
A. J.
Green
,
E. R.
Heller
,
K. D.
Chabak
,
N.
Peixoto
, and
G. H.
Jessen
,
Appl. Phys. Lett.
110
,
143505
(
2017
).
56.
W. S.
Hwang
,
A.
Verma
,
H.
Peelaers
,
V.
Protasenko
,
S.
Rouvimov
,
H.
Xing
,
A.
Seabaugh
,
W.
Haensch
,
C.
Van de Walle
,
Z.
Galazka
,
M.
Albrecht
,
R.
Fornari
, and
D.
Jena
,
Appl. Phys. Lett.
104
,
203111
(
2014
).
57.
S.
Li
,
M.
Tian
,
Q.
Gao
,
M.
Wang
,
T.
Li
,
Q.
Hu
,
X.
Li
, and
Y.
Wu
,
Nat. Mater.
18
,
1091
1097
(
2019
).

Supplementary Material