The chemical fixation of CO2 with epoxides to cyclic carbonate is an attractive 100% atom economic reaction. It is a safe and green alternative to the route from diols and toxic phosgene. In this manuscript, we present a new zwitterionic π–conjugated catalyst (Covalent Organic Polymer, COP-213) based on guanidinium and β-ketoenol functionality, which is synthesized from triaminoguanidinium halide and β-ketoenols via the ampoule method at 120 °C. The catalyst is characterized by FTIR-attenuated total reflection (ATR), Powder X-Ray diffraction, thermogravimetric analysis, XPS, and for surface area Brunauer–Emmett–Teller and CO2 uptake. It shows quantitative conversion and selectivity in chemical fixation of CO2 to epoxides under ambient conditions and without the need for cocatalysts, metals, solvent, or pressure. The catalyst can be recycled at least three times without the loss of reactivity.

Carbon dioxide (CO2) is one of the dominant anthropogenic greenhouse gases, which is believed to be contributing to global warming and climate change; hence, CO2 chemistry (capture and conversion) has appealed worldwide as the most important and top priority for the scientific community.1–7 Recently, the CO2 concentration increased to 415 ppm in the atmosphere and continues increasing.

On the other hand, CO2, an abundant, nontoxic, cheap, and nonflammable carbon source, which is formed from living organisms and in industrial processes, is a significant resource and can be easily handled at an industrial level. Chemical fixation of CO2 is a growing interest in the development of the ecofriendly processes, as CO2 can be used as a cheap and safe building block in organic synthesis.8 Among them, one of the most promising methodologies is the synthesis of five-membered cyclic carbonates via the cycloaddition reaction of CO2 to epoxides.9–14 These cyclic carbonates are important as precursors of raw materials in the production of plastics, pharmaceutical chemical intermediates, aprotic polar solvents, and biomedical applications.15–17 Recently, numerous catalyst systems, such as ammonium and phosphonium salts, ionic liquids, cyclic amidines and guanidines, porous organic polymers (POPs), and metal-organic frameworks (MOFs), have been developed for this conversion.18–33 Generally, homogeneous catalysts show effective catalytic activity with well-defined mechanisms, but main drawbacks are the need for separations and the purification of products. Heterogeneous catalysts are more beneficial in terms of scalability, rapid catalyst recovery, and reusability.34–37 But the leading heterogeneous catalysts are found to be restricted due to poor stability and low activity in the harsh reaction conditions. Some of the promising recent reports include the work by Byun38 which shows an imidazolium ionic liquid catalyst that facilitated the selective formation of cyclic carbonates under ambient reaction conditions. Recently, we have investigated a new type of pyridyl salicylimine polymeric catalyst that exhibits good conversion without any cocatalysts.39 Zhang and He40 showed the importance of guanidine based organocatalyst in the field of CO2 fixation. Therefore, it is still a challenging field to explore heterogeneous catalysts with excellent stability and activity under mild conditions for the nonredox chemical fixation of CO2.

Guanidine-based functional motifs in the form of neutral (guanidine), cationic (guanidinium), and anionic (guanidinate) units have shown wide use in chemistry, such as in crystal engineering and asymmetric catalysis. These guanidine groups exist not only in enzymes and proteins but also in many natural drugs products. The guanidinium salts promote the reactions by using ion-pair interactions and hydrogen bonding to accelerate reaction rates. The strong basicity owing to resonance stabilization of the corresponding conjugate and ease for structural modification offer guanidine derivatives significant value in organic synthesis, especially in the field of CO2 conversion.

In terms of framework building, dynamic covalent chemistry assists self-assembly of reactive building blocks into structurally complex yet robust materials, such as covalent organic frameworks (COFs), covalent organic polymers (COPs), and porous organic polymers (POPs).41–48 In literature, boronic acid self-condensation, aldehyde/amine condensation (Schiff base reaction), polycondensation with aromatic diols, and nitroso dimerization mainly show this dynamic mechanism. Among them, the π–conjugated COPs can be designed by Schiff base reaction formation of imine bonds that exhibit similar dynamic covalent chemistry.

Herein, a unique zwitterionic active site on guanidinium–β-keto-enol based π–conjugated network polymers (COP-213) has been designed and synthesized which show good activity and selectivity in cyclic carbonate formation without the participation of cocatalysts or solvents and under mild condition. The structure of the materials has been analyzed in detail and proved by FTIR-attenuated total reflection (ATR), PXRD, thermogravimetric analysis (TGA), XPS, surface area Brunauer–Emmett–Teller (BET), and CO2 uptake. To the best of our knowledge, guanidine and β-keto-enol-based network organic polymer-catalyzed transformation of CO2 is not yet reported.

The design for a cycloaddition catalyst necessitates a quaternary ammonium center and a polar/heterocyclic backbone that is stable enough for the reactive conditions. One way to achieve this goal is to include multiple modes of connectivity and nucleophilic units. Hydrazone formation through a β-keto-enol and hydrazine reaction would yield a promising architecture. Our catalyst (COP-213), therefore, consists of these multifunctional moieties, the β-keto-enol and zwitterionic guanidium units shown in Fig. 1. To prepare β-keto-enol, we revised a synthetic strategy that was reported earlier49,50 but applying to the triphenyl benzene core. This also marks the first time the tris β-keto-enol derivative of the triphenyl benzene was synthesized.

FIG. 1.

Synthesis of monomers: (a) C3 symmetric β-ketoenol unit and (b) triaminoguanidinium halide (TGCl).

FIG. 1.

Synthesis of monomers: (a) C3 symmetric β-ketoenol unit and (b) triaminoguanidinium halide (TGCl).

Close modal

In order to incorporate guanidinium units within the polymers, we have prepared triaminoguanidinium halide (TGCl) from well-known procedures51 and reacted with C3 symmetric β-ketoenol at 120 °C in the presence of dioxane:H2O mixture (2:0.6 ml) (Fig. 2). The resulting yellow powder was filtered and washed with dioxane and water several times. After that, materials were purified by Soxhlet extraction [tetrahydrofuran and dichloromethane solvent over 24 h] and dried under vacuum at 100 °C for 12 h. Computational calculations based on Density Functional Theory (DFT) conferred with a 2 × 2 unit network with a pore diameter of 8 Å (Fig. S9).

FIG. 2.

Schematic representation of organocatalyst COP-213 for chemical fixation of CO2 and epoxides to cyclic carbonates.

FIG. 2.

Schematic representation of organocatalyst COP-213 for chemical fixation of CO2 and epoxides to cyclic carbonates.

Close modal

The polymer catalyst (COP-213) was examined first by FTIR-ATR spectra. In the FT-IR spectrum of COP-213, the peaks of —C—N (bending), C=O (stretch), C=C (stretch), =C—H (stretch), and N—H (stretch) were shown at 1280, 1669, 1,555, 3031, and 3404 cm−1, respectively, which are the common features of beta-keto enol and guanidium polymers, while characteristic primary amine stretching frequency (1679 cm−1) of the precursors was absent [Fig. 3(a)]. The morphology analysis was then studied by scanning electron microscopy image to show the nature of the polymers. The powder X-ray diffraction pattern showed largely amorphous feature of COP-213 [Fig. 3(b)]. Permanent porosity of COP-213 was verified using N2 adsorption/desorption isotherms of the activated samples at 77 K. The Brunauer–Emmett–Teller (BET) surface area of COP-213 was found to be 1.8 m2/g. The low BET value indicates a strong hydrogen bonding of polymer networks. However, it shows good CO2 uptake performance with the values of 1.12 mmol/g (25.27 cm3/g) at 298 K [Fig. 3(c)]. A moderate BET surface area of 126 m2/g is calculated based on CO2 as a probe molecule. The pore size distribution from CO2 adsorption data revealed that pores predominantly remain under 9 Å (Fig. S9). The thermal stability of COP-213 was studied under nitrogen atmosphere and showed that it is stable up to 350 °C [Fig. 3(d)]. To analyze the active guanidium sites in catalyst, XPS was carried out. According to the data, N1s spectra can be convoluted into three different peaks of 399.09, 400.41, 401.33 eV, which could be assigned to —C=N, —NH—, and —C=NH+, respectively [Fig. 3(f)]. Cl 2p spectra revealed a major peak at 200.09 eV, which confirms free chloride ions in the frameworks [Fig. 3(e)].

FIG. 3.

Characterization of COP-213: (a) FTIR-ATR spectra, (b) PXRD data (inserted box shows SEM image of the polymer), (c) CO2 uptake at 273 K, and (d) thermal analysis, XPS survey (e) overall spectra of elements, (f) N1S spectra.

FIG. 3.

Characterization of COP-213: (a) FTIR-ATR spectra, (b) PXRD data (inserted box shows SEM image of the polymer), (c) CO2 uptake at 273 K, and (d) thermal analysis, XPS survey (e) overall spectra of elements, (f) N1S spectra.

Close modal

To optimize the catalytic activity for chemical fixation of CO2, epichlorohydrin was selected as a model reaction according to literature reports. A typical experiment for catalytic cycloaddition of CO2 to the epoxide was as follows: epichlorohydrin (5 mmol) and catalysts (30 mg) under solvent-free conditions were charged into a reactor that connects with a CO2 cylinder under atmospheric pressure [Fig. 4(a)]. The reactor vessel was placed into an oil bath at 100 °C and kept under stirring. After the given time, the reaction mixture was cooled to room temperature. Conversion and selectivity were measured by a 300 MHz 1H NMR analysis. The catalyst COP-213 shows excellent catalytic activity (>99% conversion) after 48 h.

FIG. 4.

Optimization of catalyst activity: (a) cycloaddition of CO2 to epichlorohydrin was used as a model reaction to optimize catalytic activity, (b) screening of the catalyst loading, and (c) reusability of COP-213.

FIG. 4.

Optimization of catalyst activity: (a) cycloaddition of CO2 to epichlorohydrin was used as a model reaction to optimize catalytic activity, (b) screening of the catalyst loading, and (c) reusability of COP-213.

Close modal

The remarkable catalytic activity of polymer COP-213 for the cycloaddition of CO2 to epoxides allowed us to obtain structural facts on the grafting of guanidinium moieties. Both cation and anion parts of the guanidinium unit are expected to have a significant effect on catalytic activities. Selection of the halide ion is also crucial because counter-anion needs to show a nucleophilicity to activate the epoxide ring and then have a good leaving ability. Among them, chloride ions show the highest activity through a SN2 mechanism. It is proposed that the epoxide is activated along with the electron deficient guanidinium unit of the polymer. On the other hand, the bulkiness of the guanidinium ion influences the electrostatic interaction between the cations and anions, which limits the counter-anion to be more nucleophilic.

Various factors including time, loading of the catalyst, and substrate variations were investigated to find the optimal reaction condition and evaluate the catalytic performance. The dependence of product yield and selectivity on reaction time was studied under identical conditions shown in Table I. The yield of cyclic carbonate increased rapidly in the initial time and stayed steady after 48 h. The effect of varying catalyst loading was investigated for different catalyst amount at 100 °C and atmospheric CO2 pressure for 24 h. Minimum catalyst loading shows negligible yield. However, increased loading realized a significant enhancement in activity, and a steady increment was observed at 30 mg catalyst loading [Fig. 4(b)]. We also investigated whether synthetic components themselves were as active as the network polymer itself. The catalytic performance of guanidium, TGCl, beta-keto-enol, and the physical mixture of TGCl & enol showed negligible activities in comparison with COP-213 (Fig. S7).

TABLE I.

Screening of substrates for the cycloaddition reaction.

SubstratesCatalystCO2TemperatureTimeConversionSelectivityTOF
(5 mmol)(mmol%)(bar)(°C)(h)(%)(%)TON(h−1)
graphic
 
4.83 100 10 >99 0.5 
   32 >99 0.75 
   12 64 >99 13 1.08 
   24 91 >99 18 0.75 
   48 99 >99 20 0.41 
graphic
 
4.83 100 48 92 >99 19 0.39 
graphic
 
4.83 100 48 99 >99 20 0.41 
graphic
 
4.83 100 48 53 >99 11 0.22 
graphic
 
4.83 100 48 20 >99 0.10 
SubstratesCatalystCO2TemperatureTimeConversionSelectivityTOF
(5 mmol)(mmol%)(bar)(°C)(h)(%)(%)TON(h−1)
graphic
 
4.83 100 10 >99 0.5 
   32 >99 0.75 
   12 64 >99 13 1.08 
   24 91 >99 18 0.75 
   48 99 >99 20 0.41 
graphic
 
4.83 100 48 92 >99 19 0.39 
graphic
 
4.83 100 48 99 >99 20 0.41 
graphic
 
4.83 100 48 53 >99 11 0.22 
graphic
 
4.83 100 48 20 >99 0.10 

To monitor industrial viability, the substrate scope was also examined. Propylene oxide, an industrially very important substrate, shows good conversion and selectivity. The epibromohydrin also yielded excellent results. The hard substrates styrene oxide and 2-(4-Fluorophenyl)oxirane led to a low conversion but high selectivity in cyclic carbonates. Less reactive and hard substrates as 1,2-Epoxybutane, 1,3-Butadiene Monoepoxide, and 1,2-Epoxyhexane conversion of cyclic carbonate showed low conversions. We are still studying these substrates to see how we can improve further. The turnover numbers and frequencies were found to be moderate for cycloaddition reaction (TON: 2–20) (Table I).

We studied the reusability of COP-213 using model substrate under optimized reaction conditions and found that the catalyst can be reused at least 3 times with minimum loss in its activity [Fig. 4(c)]. In addition, we carried out hot filtration test, where the catalyst is filtered during the catalytic reaction while the reaction kept going. In a standard cycloaddition conditions, we filtered the catalyst after 6 h (29% conversion) and let the reaction continue for another 6 h. The analysis of the samples from 6 h to 12 h revealed that there were no catalysts left in the solution that provided further conversion (Fig. S8).

Based on the literature examples,52–58 the reported catalytic performances, and the review of the catalyst structures, a plausible synergistic catalytic mechanism for this cycloaddition of CO2 to epoxides in the presence of designed catalysts was carefully proposed, as shown in Fig. 5. Interestingly, the guanidinium cation carries the positive charges on the central N atom (Fig. 2) and forms an anion-binding site. The Cl anion in the catalyst is stabilized by the positive charges distributed over the guanidinium cation and is poised to attack epoxide. Nucleophilic attack by the Cl- anion gives intermediate A via five membered transition state which causes ring opening and generates the intermediate B. Once CO2 is weakly bound to give complex C, the C–O bond forms via transition state, in which a negatively charged O atom of CO2 is stabilized by the guanidinium cation. The cation interacts with the two negatively charged O atoms, through electrostatic stabilization of the guanidinium cation. This CO2 insertion reaction is very exothermic (ΔH° ≈ −20 kcal/mol). Finally, the cyclic carbonate D is produced by an SN2 type intramolecular elimination, the guanidinium cation interacts tightly with the two negatively charged O atoms of the carbonate rather than with the leaving Cl atom, at the same time regenerating the catalyst for another cycle.

FIG. 5.

Schematic representation of a plausible mechanism for the catalytic cycloaddition of CO2 to epoxides.

FIG. 5.

Schematic representation of a plausible mechanism for the catalytic cycloaddition of CO2 to epoxides.

Close modal

In conclusion, a novel π–conjugated zwitterionic network polymer, based on β-keto-enol and guanidinium units, has been synthesized and characterized successfully. The synthesized organocatalyst exhibits high activity and selectivity for cycloaddition reaction of CO2 to epoxide without a cocatalyst under a solvent-free condition in atmospheric pressure. The conversion of CO2 to various cyclic carbonates takes place effectively using this catalyst because of the “electrophile–nucleophile” synergistic effect for epoxide ring opening. It is expected that guanidine-based polymers could significantly impact the development of heterogeneous catalysis through rational design and play an important role in CO2 capture and utilization to value-added chemicals in industries.

See supplementary material for more details on materials and methods, characterization of organocatalysts, and products.

This work was supported by the Saudi Aramco-KAIST CO2 Management Center and the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) grant funded by the Korea Government (MSIP) (Grant Nos. NRF-2017M3A7B4042140 and NRF-2017M3A7B4042235).

1.
T.
Sakakura
,
J.-C.
Choi
, and
H.
Yasuda
,
Chem. Rev.
107
,
2365
(
2007
).
2.
J. C.
Abanades
,
E. S.
Rubin
,
M.
Mazzotti
, and
H. J.
Herzog
,
Energy Environ. Sci.
10
,
2491
(
2017
).
3.
Z.
Sun
,
T.
Ma
,
H.
Tao
,
Q.
Fan
, and
B.
Han
,
Chem
3
,
560
(
2017
).
4.
S.
Solomon
,
G.-K.
Plattner
,
R.
Knutti
, and
P.
Friedlingstein
,
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
106
,
1704
(
2009
).
5.
D.
Thirion
,
J. S.
Lee
,
E.
Özdemir
, and
C. T.
Yavuz
,
Beilstein J. Org. Chem.
12
,
2274
(
2016
).
6.
S.
Feng
,
M.
Wang
,
Y.
Zhou
,
P.
Li
,
W.
Tu
, and
Z.
Zou
,
APL Mater.
3
,
104416
(
2015
).
7.
A.
Otto
,
T.
Grube
,
S.
Schiebahn
, and
D.
Stolten
,
Energy Environ. Sci.
8
,
3283
(
2015
).
8.
Y.
Zhao
,
B.
Yu
,
Z.
Yang
,
H.
Zhang
,
L.
Hao
,
X.
Gao
, and
Z.
Liu
,
Angew. Chem., Int. Ed.
53
,
5922
(
2014
).
9.
J.
Roeser
,
K.
Kailasam
, and
A.
Thomas
,
ChemSusChem
5
,
1793
(
2012
).
10.
M.
Aresta
,
A.
Dibenedetto
, and
I.
Tommasi
,
Energy Fuels
15
,
269
(
2001
).
11.
S.
Kaneco
,
K.
Liba
,
K.
Ohta
, and
T.
Mizuno
,
Energy Sources
22
,
127
(
2000
).
12.
A. C.
Kathalikkattil
,
R.
Roshan
,
J.
Tharun
,
R.
Babu
,
G.-S.
Jeong
,
D.-W.
Kim
,
S. J.
Cho
, and
D.-W.
Park
,
Chem. Commun.
52
,
280
(
2016
).
13.
Y.
Wang
,
H.
Arandiyan
,
J.
Scott
,
A.
Bagheri
,
H.
Dai
, and
R.
Amal
,
J. Mater. Chem. A
5
,
8825
(
2017
).
14.
K.
Thiel
,
R.
Zehbe
,
J.
Roeser
,
P.
Strauch
,
S.
Enthaler
, and
A.
Thomas
,
Polym. Chem.
4
,
1848
(
2013
).
15.
D. J.
Darensbourg
,
Chem. Rev.
107
,
2388
(
2007
).
16.
J. H.
Clements
,
Ind. Eng. Chem. Res.
42
(
4
),
663
(
2003
).
17.
D.-H.
Lan
,
N.
Fan
,
Y.
Wang
,
X.
Gao
,
P.
Zhang
,
L.
Chen
,
C.-T.
Au
, and
S.-F.
Yin
,
Chin. J. Catal.
37
,
826
(
2016
).
18.
K.
Kim
,
S.
Kim
,
S. N.
Talapaneni
,
O.
Buyukcakir
,
A. M. I.
Almutawa
,
K.
Polychronopoulou
, and
A.
Coskun
,
Polymer
126
,
296
(
2017
).
19.
F.
Liu
,
Y.
Gu
,
P.
Zhao
,
J.
Gao
, and
M.
Liu
,
ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng.
7
,
5940
(
2019
).
20.
W.
Cheng
,
Q.
Su
,
J.
Wang
,
J.
Sun
, and
F. T. T.
Ng
,
Catalysts
3
,
878
(
2013
).
21.
W.
Wang
,
C.
Li
,
L.
Yan
,
Y.
Wang
,
M.
Jaing
, and
Y.
Ding
,
ACS Catal.
6
,
6091
(
2016
).
22.
Y.
Yoshida
,
N.
Aoyagi
, and
T.
Endo
,
Beilstein J. Org. Chem.
14
,
2204
(
2018
).
23.
B.
Liu
,
M.
Liu
,
L.
Liang
, and
J.
Sun
,
Catalysts
5
,
119
(
2015
).
24.
F. S.
Pereira
,
E. R.
de Azevedo
,
E. F.
da Silva
,
T. J.
Bonagamba
,
D. L.
da Silva Agostíni
,
A.
Magalhães
,
A. E.
Job
, and
E. R. P.
González
,
Tetrahedron
64
,
10097
(
2008
).
25.
D.
Ma
,
K.
Liu
,
J.
Li
, and
Z.
Shi
,
ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng.
6
,
15050
(
2018
).
26.
H.
Zhong
,
Y.
Su
,
X.
Chen
,
X.
Li
, and
R.
Wang
,
ChemSusChem
10
,
4855
(
2017
).
27.
L.
Wang
,
G.
Zhang
,
K.
Kodama
, and
T.
Hirose
,
Green Chem.
18
,
1229
(
2016
).
28.
P. T. K.
Nguyen
,
H. T. D.
Nguyen
,
H. N.
Nguyen
,
C. A.
Trickett
,
Q. T.
Ton
,
E.
Gutiérrez-Puebla
,
M. A.
Monge
,
K. E.
Cordova
, and
F.
Gándara
,
ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces
10
,
733
(
2018
).
29.
P.
Patel
,
B.
Parmar
,
R. I.
Kureshy
,
N.
Khan
, and
E.
Suresh
,
ChemCatChem
10
,
2401
(
2018
).
30.
J.
Liang
,
Y.-Q.
Xie
,
Q.
Wu
,
X.-Y.
Wang
,
T.-T.
Liu
,
H.-F.
Li
,
Y.-B.
Huang
, and
R.
Cao
,
Inorg. Chem.
57
,
2584
(
2018
).
31.
C.-Y.
Gao
,
Y.
Yang
,
J.
Liu
, and
Z.-M.
Sun
,
Dalton Trans.
48
,
1246
(
2019
).
32.
O.
Buyukcakir
,
S. H.
Je
,
S. N.
Talapaneni
,
D.
Kim
, and
A.
Coskun
,
ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces
9
,
7209
(
2017
).
33.
W. Y.
Gao
,
Y.
Chen
,
Y.
Niu
,
K.
Williams
,
L.
Cash
,
P. J.
Perez
,
L.
Wojtas
,
J.
Cai
,
Y. S.
Chen
, and
S.
Ma
,
Angew. Chem., Int. Ed.
53
,
2615
(
2014
).
34.
F.
Chen
,
X.
Li
,
B.
Wang
,
T.
Xu
,
S.-L.
Chen
,
P.
Liu
, and
C.
Hu
,
Chem. - Eur. J.
18
,
9870
(
2012
).
35.
X.
Jiang
,
F.
Gou
,
F.
Chen
, and
H.
Jing
,
Green Chem.
18
,
3567
(
2016
).
36.
F. D.
Monica
,
A.
Buonerba
,
V.
Paradiso
,
S.
Milione
,
A.
Grassi
, and
C.
Capacchione
,
Adv. Synth. Catal.
361
,
243
(
2017
).
37.
J.
Peng
,
S.
Wang
,
H.-J.
Yang
,
B.
Ban
,
Z.
Wei
,
L.
Wang
, and
B.
Lei
,
Catal. Today
330
,
76
(
2019
).
38.
J.
Byun
and
K. A. I.
Zhang
,
ChemCatChem
10
,
4610
(
2018
).
39.
S.
Subramanian
,
J.
Park
,
J.
Byun
,
Y.
Jung
, and
C. T.
Yavuz
,
ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces
10
,
9478
(
2018
).
40.
S.
Zhang
and
L.-N.
He
,
Aust. J. Chem.
67
,
980
(
2014
).
41.
Y.
Cui
,
J.
Du
,
Y.
Liu
,
Y.
Yu
,
S.
Wang
,
H.
Pang
,
Z.
Liang
, and
J.
Yu
,
Polym. Chem.
9
,
2643
(
2018
).
42.
43.
D.
Zhao
,
P. K.
Thallapally
,
C.
Petit
, and
J.
Gascon
,
ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng.
7
,
7997
(
2019
).
44.
A. D.
Burrows
,
L. C.
Fisher
,
D.
Hodgson
,
M. F.
Mahon
,
N. F.
Cessford
,
T.
Düren
,
C.
Richardson
, and
S. P.
Rigby
,
CrystEngComm
14
,
188
(
2012
).
45.
Q.
Sun
,
N.
Wang
,
Q.
Bing
,
P.
Zhang
,
M.
Jia
, and
J.
Yu
,
Chem
3
,
477
(
2017
).
46.
R.
Dawson
,
A. I.
Cooper
, and
D. J.
Adams
,
Prog. Polym. Sci.
37
,
530
(
2012
).
47.
B.
Hu
,
Q.
Sun
,
C.
Zuo
,
Y.
Pei
,
S.
Yang
,
H.
Zheng
, and
F.
Liu
,
Beilstein J. Nanotechnol.
10
,
1157
(
2019
).
48.
Y.
Byun
,
S. H.
Je
,
S. N.
Talapaneni
, and
A.
Coskun
,
Chem. - Eur. J.
25
,
10262
(
2019
).
49.
B.
Vilhanová
,
M.
Ranocchiari
, and
J. A.
van Bokhoven
,
ChemCatChem
8
,
308
(
2016
).
50.
51.
S.
Mitra
,
S.
Kandambeth
,
B. P.
Biswal
,
M.
Abdul Khayum
,
C. K.
Choudhury
,
M.
Mehta
,
G.
Kaur
,
S.
Banerjee
,
A.
Prabhune
,
S.
Verma
,
S.
Roy
,
U. K.
Kharul
, and
R.
Banerjee
,
J. Am. Chem. Soc.
138
,
2823
(
2016
).
52.
J.
Song
,
Z.
Zhang
,
S.
Hu
,
T.
Wu
,
T.
Jiang
, and
B.
Han
,
Green Chem.
11
,
1031
(
2009
).
53.
J.
Li
,
D.
Jia
,
Z.
Guo
,
Y.
Liu
,
Y.
Lyu
,
Y.
Zhou
, and
J.
Wang
,
Green Chem.
19
,
2675
(
2017
).
54.
C.
Calabrese
,
L. F.
Liotta
,
E.
Carbonell
,
F.
Giacalone
,
M.
Gruttadauria
, and
C.
Aprile
,
ChemSusChem
10
,
1202
(
2017
).
55.
O.
Buyukcakir
,
S.-H.
Je
,
D. S.
Choi
,
S. N.
Talapaneni
,
Y.
Seo
,
Y.
Jung
,
K.
Polychronopoulou
, and
A.
Coskun
,
Chem. Commun.
52
,
934
(
2016
).
56.
Y.
Zhi
,
P.
Shao
,
X.
Feng
,
H.
Xia
,
Y.
Zhang
,
Z.
Shi
,
Y.
Mu
, and
X.
Liu
,
J. Mater. Chem. A
6
,
374
(
2018
).
57.
C.
Calabrese
,
F.
Giacalone
, and
C.
Aprile
,
Catalysts
9
,
325
(
2019
).
58.
M. H.
Beyzavi
,
C. J.
Stephenson
,
Y.
Liu
,
O.
Karagiaridi
,
J. T.
Hupp
, and
O. K.
Farha
,
Front. Energy Res.
2
,
63
(
2015
).

Supplementary Material