We report on the growth of epitaxial Sr2RuO4 films using a hybrid molecular beam epitaxy approach in which a volatile precursor containing RuO4 is used to supply ruthenium and oxygen. The use of the precursor overcomes a number of issues encountered in traditional molecular beam epitaxy that uses elemental metal sources. Phase-pure, epitaxial thin films of Sr2RuO4 are obtained. At high substrate temperatures, growth proceeds in a layer-by-layer mode with intensity oscillations observed in reflection high-energy electron diffraction. Films are of high structural quality, as documented by x-ray diffraction, atomic force microscopy, and transmission electron microscopy. The method should be suitable for the growth of other complex oxides containing ruthenium, opening up opportunities to investigate thin films that host rich exotic ground states.

The discovery of unusual ground states in the layered ruthenates, such as p-wave superconductivity1,2 and nematic order,3 has led to significant interest in the growth of high-quality thin films of these materials. For example, Sr2RuO4 is an unconventional, spin triplet superconductor,4 whose superconducting transition temperature is highly sensitive to strain.5 Thin films of Sr2RuO4 would allow for advancing the understanding of unconventional forms of superconductivity through the application of epitaxial strain6 and are needed for applications in topological and hybrid superconducting devices. A remarkable success of pulsed laser deposition (PLD) is the growth of superconducting Sr2RuO4 films7,8 because even minute defect concentrations destroy the superconductivity completely.9 

Molecular beam epitaxy (MBE) has been key in the development of high quality semiconductor thin film heterostructures10 and has produced high performance complex oxide thin films.11 MBE of the ruthenates is, however, challenging because of the extremely low volatility of Ru,12 requiring the use of electron beam assisted evaporation.13,14 Electron beam sources suffer from inherent flux variations and require in situ monitoring and real time feedback to continuously adjust the flux,14 which makes stoichiometry control difficult. Other challenges include practical limits on the oxygen pressure/fluxes that can be used and flux instabilities in the presence of oxygen.15 

An alternative approach is hybrid MBE, which uses a combination of solid and gas sources to supply the metals.16,17 In particular, metalorganic and other gaseous sources that have much higher vapor pressures and already contain metals bonded to oxygen, and whose fluxes can be precisely controlled, have been shown to successfully address all of the challenges in MBE of perovskite titanates,17–19 zirconates,20 and vanadates,21 resulting in high quality thin films having record properties.22,23

Here, we demonstrate the growth of epitaxial Sr2RuO4 films using hybrid MBE. Strontium is evaporated from an elemental metal source while a volatile ruthenium tetroxide (RuO4)-containing precursor is used to supply pre-oxidized Ru.24 The RuO4 precursor has been used to synthesize Ru, RuO2, and SrRuO3 films24–26 but not yet in MBE. The resulting films are shown to be of excellent structural quality. The approach should be suitable for other ruthenate systems as well, thus opening up a viable MBE approach for thin films of a very exciting class of materials.

Sr2RuO4 films were grown on (001) (LaAlO3)0.3(Sr2AlTaO6)0.7 (LSAT) substrates in an oxide MBE system (GEN 930, Veeco Instruments). The in-plane lattice parameters of Sr2RuO4 and LSAT are (nearly) perfectly matched (3.87 Å27,28), making LSAT an excellent substrate for the epitaxial growth of strain-free Sr2RuO4. Substrates were etched in a 3:1 solution of HCl:HNO3 and backed with 350 nm Ta to facilitate the radiative heating from the substrate heater during growth. Films were grown by co-deposition. Strontium was supplied from a high-purity elemental source contained in a low-temperature effusion cell. Ruthenium was supplied in the form of the RuO4-containing precursor.24 This precursor was packed with fluorinated ethers to stabilize the highly reactive RuO4 molecules, which comprised about 10% by weight of the mixture. The precursor cylinder was at room temperature and no carrier gas was used, as the vapor pressure of RuO4 is sufficiently high for delivery to the growth chamber. The precursor mixture was delivered to the growth chamber via a gas inlet system using a capacitive manometer and a linear leak valve to monitor and control the flow rate. It was introduced to the growth chamber through a gas injector heated to 50 °C. Additional oxygen was supplied using a plasma source operated at a power of 300 W with a background pressure of ∼3 × 10−6 Torr during growth. Film growth and structure were monitored in situ using reflection high-energy electron diffraction (RHEED) and ex situ via x-ray diffraction (XRD), atomic-force microscopy (AFM), and transmission electron microscopy (TEM). Room temperature electrical measurement was performed in four point probe (van der Pauw) geometry using Au/Ti ohmic contacts.

The film stoichiometry was varied by changing the Sr flux via the effusion cell temperature and keeping all the other fluxes constant. Similar to hybrid MBE of SrTiO3,29 post-growth RHEED patterns (Fig. 1) were found to be sensitive to the film stoichiometry. For Sr-deficient films, the RHEED pattern was noticeable spotty, especially along the [110] direction, while chevron patterns became visible in Sr-rich films. The streaky post-growth RHEED patterns along the [100] and [110] directions for the stoichiometric films indicated a smooth film surface.

FIG. 1.

Evolution of RHEED patterns with varying stoichiometry of the Sr2RuO4 films. From left to right, the strontium effusion cell temperature was set at 480 °C (Sr-deficient), 488 °C (stoichiometric), and 498 °C (Sr-rich), with the RuO4-containing flux held constant. The substrate temperature was maintained at 950 °C for all three films.

FIG. 1.

Evolution of RHEED patterns with varying stoichiometry of the Sr2RuO4 films. From left to right, the strontium effusion cell temperature was set at 480 °C (Sr-deficient), 488 °C (stoichiometric), and 498 °C (Sr-rich), with the RuO4-containing flux held constant. The substrate temperature was maintained at 950 °C for all three films.

Close modal

The stoichiometry was also evident in the electrical properties, as the room temperature resistivities of the Sr-deficient, stoichiometric, and Sr-rich films were 509 μΩ cm, 230 μΩ cm, and 643 μΩ cm, respectively. In contrast, the out-of-plane lattice parameter (12.74 Å) was found to be independent of stoichiometry. Thus, the best indicators of stoichiometric Sr2RuO4 films were high intensity and streakiness of the RHEED pattern, prominent thickness fringes in XRD, and low resistivity.

In addition to the flux ratios during growth, high substrate temperatures were essential. Films grown at substrate temperatures of less than 920 °C (thermocouple reading) showed no oscillations in RHEED during growth and were highly resistive. The use of higher substrate temperatures during growth also resulted in a substantial decrease in the room temperature resistivity, from 1100 μΩ cm for films grown at 920 °C to 230 μΩ cm for films grown at 950 °C. Furthermore, the highest substrate temperatures (950 °C) used in this study were found to promote layer-by-layer growth (see below). All results shown here are from films grown at 950 °C.

RHEED intensity oscillations, shown in Fig. 2(a), indicated the layer-by-layer growth mode. This growth mode allows for excellent control over layer thickness and is a signature of sufficiently high adatom mobility on the growing film surface. The initial behavior of the RHEED intensity may be a result of the change in symmetry from the cubic substrate to the tetragonal film, as described previously for PLD-grown films.7 The period of the intensity oscillations corresponded to a growth rate of 16 nm/h, with two intensity oscillations per Sr2RuO4 unit cell, as has also been found by others.30 AFM [Fig. 2(b)] confirmed the smooth film surface with features that are on the order of the unit cell height (12.74 Å).

FIG. 2.

(a) RHEED intensity oscillations at the beginning of growth, indicating that growth proceeds in a layer-by-layer mode. (b) 2 μm × 2 μm AFM image of the Sr2RuO4 film surface. The surface is atomically flat with no distinct features.

FIG. 2.

(a) RHEED intensity oscillations at the beginning of growth, indicating that growth proceeds in a layer-by-layer mode. (b) 2 μm × 2 μm AFM image of the Sr2RuO4 film surface. The surface is atomically flat with no distinct features.

Close modal

A wide angle XRD scan is shown in Fig. 3(a). The 002, 004, 006, 008, and 0010 Bragg reflections of Sr2RuO4 are all present. The lattice spacing is consistent with an out-of-plane lattice constant of 12.74 Å, matching the known value for the tetragonal unit cell of Sr2RuO4 (space group I4/mmm31). Thus, the films are phase-pure Sr2RuO4. This is significant, as mixed-phase films, containing perovskite SrRuO3 and the n = 2 Ruddlesden-Popper phase Sr3Ru2O7, are also possible.32 Figure 3(b) shows a high-resolution scan around the 006 reflection of Sr2RuO4 and the 002 reflection of the LSAT substrate. The presence of prominent thickness fringes indicates very smooth interfaces and surfaces. The spacing of the fringes corresponds to a film thickness of 29 nm, in good agreement with the thickness derived from the period of the RHEED oscillations. The rocking curve full width at half maximum of the 006 Sr2RuO4 peak was 0.075°, confirming a high crystalline quality of the film [see Fig. 3(c)]. Epitaxial growth of phase-pure Sr2RuO4 was also confirmed by cross section high-angle annular dark-field (HAADF) imaging in scanning TEM (STEM), as shown in Fig. 4. The films consist of only the n = 1 Ruddlesden-Popper layered crystal structure of Sr2RuO4. The images show abrupt interfaces and no extended defects.

FIG. 3.

(a) Wide-angle XRD scan of Sr2RuO4 grown on LSAT. From left to right, the 002, 004, 006, 008, and 0010 Bragg reflections of Sr2RuO4 are present (red circles), corresponding to an out-of-plane (growth direction) lattice constant of 12.74 Å. The peaks from the LSAT substrate (orange squares) correspond to the 001, 002, and 003 reflections. (b) High resolution XRD scan showing the 006 reflection of Sr2RuO4 and the 002 reflection of the LSAT substrate. The prominent thickness fringes indicate a high quality film with smooth interfaces, with the fringe spacing corresponding to a Sr2RuO4 film thickness of 29 nm. (c) Rocking curve of the 006 peak of a stoichiometric Sr2RuO4 film. The full width at half maximum is 0.075°.

FIG. 3.

(a) Wide-angle XRD scan of Sr2RuO4 grown on LSAT. From left to right, the 002, 004, 006, 008, and 0010 Bragg reflections of Sr2RuO4 are present (red circles), corresponding to an out-of-plane (growth direction) lattice constant of 12.74 Å. The peaks from the LSAT substrate (orange squares) correspond to the 001, 002, and 003 reflections. (b) High resolution XRD scan showing the 006 reflection of Sr2RuO4 and the 002 reflection of the LSAT substrate. The prominent thickness fringes indicate a high quality film with smooth interfaces, with the fringe spacing corresponding to a Sr2RuO4 film thickness of 29 nm. (c) Rocking curve of the 006 peak of a stoichiometric Sr2RuO4 film. The full width at half maximum is 0.075°.

Close modal
FIG. 4.

Cross section HAADF-STEM images of a Sr2RuO4 film grown on LSAT. (a) Large field of view showing epitaxial growth with smooth interfaces and no extended defects. (b) Higher magnification view confirms the tetragonal Sr2RuO4 crystal structure with the c-axis parallel to the growth direction.

FIG. 4.

Cross section HAADF-STEM images of a Sr2RuO4 film grown on LSAT. (a) Large field of view showing epitaxial growth with smooth interfaces and no extended defects. (b) Higher magnification view confirms the tetragonal Sr2RuO4 crystal structure with the c-axis parallel to the growth direction.

Close modal

To summarize, we have demonstrated the growth of phase pure thin films of Sr2RuO4 with high structural quality using a hybrid molecular beam epitaxy approach that utilizes a highly volatile precursor containing reactive RuO4 molecules. The method allows for control over the stoichiometry and layer-by-layer growth. Future studies will focus on the characterization of the electrical properties as a function of temperature. The excellent structural quality of the Sr2RuO4 film points towards this precursor as a promising route to the development of other materials in the strontium ruthenate family.

The work was supported by a MURI funded by the U.S. Army Research Office (Grant No. W911NF-16-1-0361) and by FAME, one of six centers of STARnet, a Semiconductor Research Corporation program sponsored by MARCO and DARPA. The microscopy work was supported by the U.S. Department of Energy (Grant No. DEFG02-02ER45994).

1.
Y.
Maeno
,
H.
Hashimoto
,
K.
Yoshida
,
S.
Nishizaki
,
T.
Fujita
,
J. G.
Bednorz
, and
F.
Lichtenberg
, “
Superconductivity in a layered perovskite without copper
,”
Nature
372
,
532
534
(
1994
).
2.
K. D.
Nelson
,
Z. Q.
Mao
,
Y.
Maeno
, and
Y.
Liu
, “
Odd-parity superconductivity in Sr2RuO4
,”
Science
306
,
1151
1154
(
2004
).
3.
R. A.
Borzi
,
S. A.
Grigera
,
J.
Farrell
,
R. S.
Perry
,
S. J. S.
Lister
,
S. L.
Lee
,
D. A.
Tennant
,
Y.
Maeno
, and
A. P.
Mackenzie
, “
Formation of a nematic fluid at high fields in Sr3Ru2O7
,”
Science
315
,
214
217
(
2007
).
4.
A. P.
Mackenzie
and
Y.
Maeno
, “
The superconductivity of Sr2RuO4 and the physics of spin-triplet pairing
,”
Rev. Mod. Phys.
75
,
657
712
(
2003
).
5.
C. W.
Hicks
,
D. O.
Brodsky
,
E. A.
Yelland
,
A. S.
Gibbs
,
J. A. N.
Bruin
,
M. E.
Barber
,
S. D.
Edkins
,
K.
Nishimura
,
S.
Yonezawa
,
Y.
Maeno
, and
A. P.
Mackenzie
, “
Strong increase of Tc of Sr2RuO4 under both tensile and compressive strain
,”
Science
344
,
283
285
(
2014
).
6.
B.
Burganov
,
C.
Adamo
,
A.
Mulder
,
M.
Uchida
,
P. D. C.
King
,
J. W.
Harter
,
D. E.
Shai
,
A. S.
Gibbs
,
A. P.
Mackenzie
,
R.
Uecker
,
M.
Bruetzam
,
M. R.
Beasley
,
C. J.
Fennie
,
D. G.
Schlom
, and
K. M.
Shen
, “
Strain control of fermiology and many-body interactions in two-dimensional ruthenates
,”
Phys. Rev. Lett.
116
,
197003
(
2016
).
7.
Y.
Krockenberger
,
M.
Uchida
,
K. S.
Takahashi
,
M.
Nakamura
,
M.
Kawasaki
, and
Y.
Tokura
, “
Growth of superconducting Sr2RuO4 thin films
,”
Appl. Phys. Lett.
97
,
082502
(
2010
).
8.
J.
Cao
,
D.
Massarotti
,
M. E.
Vickers
,
A.
Kursumovic
,
A.
Di Bernardo
,
J. W. A.
Robinson
,
F.
Tafuri
,
J. L.
MacManus-Driscoll
, and
M. G.
Blamire
, “
Enhanced localized superconductivity in Sr2RuO4 thin film by pulsed laser deposition
,”
Supercond. Sci. Technol.
29
,
095005
(
2016
).
9.
A. P.
Mackenzie
,
R. K. W.
Haselwimmer
,
A. W.
Tyler
,
G. G.
Lonzarich
,
Y.
Mori
,
S.
Nishizaki
, and
Y.
Maeno
, “
Extremely strong dependence of superconductivity on disorder in Sr2RuO4
,”
Phys. Rev. Lett.
80
,
161
164
(
1998
).
10.
L.
Pfeiffer
and
K. W.
West
, “
The role of MBE in recent quantum Hall effect physics discoveries
,”
Phys. E
20
,
57
64
(
2003
).
11.
D. G.
Schlom
, “
Perspective: Oxide molecular-beam epitaxy rocks!
,”
APL Mater.
3
,
062403
(
2015
).
12.
N. J.
Carrera
,
R. F.
Walker
, and
E. R.
Plante
, “
Vapor pressures of ruthenium and osmium
,”
J. Res. Natl. Bur. Stand., Sect. A
68A
,
325
(
1964
).
13.
W.
Tian
,
J. H.
Haeni
,
D. G.
Schlom
,
E.
Hutchinson
,
B. L.
Sheu
,
M. M.
Rosario
,
P.
Schiffer
,
Y.
Liu
,
M. A.
Zurbuchen
, and
X. Q.
Pan
, “
Epitaxial growth and magnetic properties of the first five members of the layered Srn+1RunO3n+1 oxide series
,”
Appl. Phys. Lett.
90
,
022507
(
2007
).
14.
J. H.
Haeni
, Ph.D. thesis,
Penn State University
,
2002
.
15.
E. S.
Hellman
and
E. H.
Hartford
, “
Effects of oxygen on the sublimation of alkaline-earths from effusion cells
,”
J. Vac. Sci. Technol., B: Microelectron. Nanometer Struct.
12
,
1178
1180
(
1994
).
16.
L. L. H.
King
,
K. Y.
Hsieh
,
D. J.
Lichtenwalner
, and
A. I.
Kingon
, “
Insitu deposition of superconducting YBa2Cu3O7-x and DyBa2Cu3O7-x thin-films by organometallic molecular-beam epitaxy
,”
Appl. Phys. Lett.
59
,
3045
3047
(
1991
).
17.
B.
Jalan
,
R.
Engel-Herbert
,
N. J.
Wright
, and
S.
Stemmer
, “
Growth of high-quality SrTiO3 films using a hybrid molecular beam epitaxy approach
,”
J. Vac. Sci. Technol., A
27
,
461
464
(
2009
).
18.
P.
Moetakef
,
J. Y.
Zhang
,
S.
Raghavan
,
A. P.
Kajdos
, and
S.
Stemmer
, “
Growth window and effect of substrate symmetry in hybrid molecular beam epitaxy of a Mott insulating rare earth titanate
,”
J. Vac. Sci. Technol., A
31
,
041503
(
2013
).
19.
P.
Xu
,
D.
Phelan
,
J. S.
Jeong
,
K. A.
Mkhoyan
, and
B.
Jalan
, “
Stoichiometry-driven metal-to-insulator transition in NdTiO3/SrTiO3 heterostructures
,”
Appl. Phys. Lett.
104
,
082109
(
2014
).
20.
A. P.
Kajdos
,
D. G.
Ouellette
,
T. A.
Cain
, and
S.
Stemmer
, “
Two-dimensional electron gas in a modulation-doped SrTiO3/Sr(Ti, Zr)O3 heterostructure
,”
Appl. Phys. Lett.
103
,
082120
(
2013
).
21.
J. A.
Moyer
,
C.
Eaton
, and
R.
Engel-Herbert
, “
Highly conductive SrVO3 as a bottom electrode for functional perovskite oxides
,”
Adv. Mater.
25
,
3578
3582
(
2013
).
22.
J.
Son
,
P.
Moetakef
,
B.
Jalan
,
O.
Bierwagen
,
N. J.
Wright
,
R.
Engel-Herbert
, and
S.
Stemmer
, “
Epitaxial SrTiO3 films with electron mobilities exceeding 30,000 cm2V-1s-1
,”
Nat. Mater.
9
,
482
484
(
2010
).
23.
E.
Mikheev
,
A. P.
Kajdos
,
A. J.
Hauser
, and
S.
Stemmer
, “
Electric field-tunable BaxSr1-xTiO3 films with high figures of merit grown by molecular beam epitaxy
,”
Appl. Phys. Lett.
101
,
252906
(
2012
).
24.
J.
Gatineau
,
K.
Yanagita
, and
C.
Dussarrat
, “
A new RuO4 solvent solution for pure ruthenium film depositions
,”
Microelectron. Eng.
83
,
2248
2252
(
2006
).
25.
J. H.
Han
,
S. W.
Lee
,
S. K.
Kim
,
S.
Han
,
C. S.
Hwang
,
C.
Dussarrat
, and
J.
Gatineau
, “
Growth of RuO2 thin films by pulsed-chemical vapor deposition using RuO4 precursor and 5% H2 reduction gas
,”
Chem. Mater.
22
,
5700
5706
(
2010
).
26.
J. H.
Han
,
W.
Lee
,
W.
Jeon
,
S. W.
Lee
, and
C. S.
Hwang
, “
Growth of conductive SrRuO3 films by combining atomic layer deposited SrO and chemical vapor deposited RuO2 layers
,”
Chem. Mater.
24
,
4686
4692
(
2012
).
27.
H.
Muller-Buschbaum
and
J.
Wilkens
, “
Ein Beitrag über Sr2RuO4 und Sr3Ru2O7 Zur Oktaederstreckung von M4+ in K2NiF4- und Sr3Ti2O7-Typ-Verbindungen
,”
Z. Anorg. Allg. Chem.
591
,
161
166
(
1990
).
28.
D. A.
Pawlak
,
M.
Ito
,
L.
Dobrzycki
,
K.
Wozniak
,
M.
Oku
,
K.
Shimamura
, and
T.
Fukuda
, “
Structure and spectroscopic properties of (AA′)(BB′)O3 mixed-perovskite crystals
,”
J. Mater. Res.
20
,
3329
3337
(
2005
).
29.
A. P.
Kajdos
and
S.
Stemmer
, “
Surface reconstructions in molecular beam epitaxy of SrTiO3
,”
Appl. Phys. Lett.
105
,
191901
(
2014
).
30.
D.
Reisinger
,
B.
Blass
,
J.
Klein
,
J. B.
Philipp
,
M.
Schonecke
,
A.
Erb
,
L.
Alff
, and
R.
Gross
, “
Sub-unit cell layer-by-layer growth of Fe3O4, MgO, and Sr2RuO4 thin films
,”
Appl. Phys. A
77
,
619
621
(
2003
).
31.
L.
Walz
and
F.
Lichtenberg
, “
Refinement of the structure of Sr2RuO4 with 100 and 295 K X-ray data
,”
Acta Crystallogr., Sect. C: Cryst. Struct. Commun.
49
,
1268
1270
(
1993
).
32.
T.
Ohnishi
and
K.
Takada
, “
Epitaxial thin-film growth of SrRuO3, Sr3Ru2O7, and Sr2RuO4 from a SrRuO3 target by pulsed laser deposition
,”
Appl. Phys. Express
4
,
025501
(
2011
).