The composition of 75V2O5–(25-x) MgO–xLi2O (x = 0, 1.5, 3.0, 4.5, and 6.0) is synthesized by the melt quenching method. The effects of Li2O on devitrification, physical, thermal, structural, and conducting properties of the as-quenched samples are analyzed utilizing various experimental techniques. X-ray diffraction and differential thermal analysis confirmed the formation of phase-separated glasses up to 3.0 mol. % of Li2O. Above this concentration of Li2O, the samples are glass ceramic. With an increase in the concentration of Li2O, the density increases in all the samples. The Raman spectra demonstrate that as the concentration of Li2O increases, there is a transition of VO5 units into different structural units of vanadium oxide. The highest conductivity is observed for the composition with x = 4.5, i.e., 10−4 S/cm at 250 °C. The activation energy indicated that the present samples could be mixed conductors in nature. These samples can be used as cathode materials in energy storage devices due to their mixed conduction with an appropriate conductivity at 250 °C.

V2O5 is a good electrical conductor that exhibits conductivity in the range of 10−3–10−5 S/cm at room temperature due to the variable transition states of vanadium, such as V5+/V4+/V3+, with its layered type crystal structure.1,2 This structural characteristic could be modified and applied in various alkali ion batteries and rechargeable vanadium redox flow batteries (VRFBs).3,4 A battery must have good conductivity and excellent storage capacity. The crystalline V2O5 is a predominant electronic conductor.5 It can be converted into mixed (electric–ionic) conductors to create disordering such as oxygen vacancies and other structural disorders such as glassy states. Hägg et al. made the first unsuccessful attempt to create glass from V2O5 in their research.6 V2O5–P2O5 glass with a high percentage of vanadium oxide is also reported.7 During the addition of alkali earth metal oxide to V2O5, VO5 crystalline polyhedral structural units are transformed into VO4 tetrahedral structural units.8 In a glass matrix, vanadyl ions often acquire threefold and fourfold symmetry.9,10 The twin-roller approach was used to create V2O5–MO (M = Mg, Ca, and Ba) glass, and a link between structural alterations and electrical characteristics was established.11 The thermal origin in the switching and formation of conducting channels in vanadium phosphate glasses is also reported.12 The addition of alkaline earth metal oxides in the vanadate network has a significant impact on electrical characteristics.13 

Furthermore, the addition of alkali metal oxides strongly influences the glass network structure of V2O5. They act as a good modifier because of their small size with high mobility and easy diffusion. Alkali metal oxide doped vanadate glasses have widely been studied due to their numerous applications in optical and electronic devices.14–16 Vanadium in V2O5 can transition into lower oxidation states depending on the dopant’s chemical composition and concentration. In order to preserve the overall electrical neutrality, this results in the formation of oxygen vacancies.17 Punia et al.15 investigated the relationship between density and molar volume due to a structural shift from VO4 to VO5 when Bi2O3 was added to zinc vanadate. Prasad and Basu studied that the addition of Na2O increases the conductivity of V2O5.18 Most of the researchers13,19,20 have reported that the alkali or alkaline earth metal oxides lead to depolymerization of the V2O5 network structure.21 The occurrence of vanadium in different oxidation states influences the overall conductivity of V2O5 containing samples due to unpaired electrons. The unpaired electrons or slow-moving electrons polarize the surrounding vanadium ions and produces polarons. Conduction is basically due to unpaired 3d1 electrons (hopping) between V5+ and V4+ valence states, as shown in the following equation:
V4+ O V5+ O V4+.
(1)

These unpaired electrons induced polarization around the vanadium ion, which led to the formation of polarons.22 Basically, polaron hopping between different vanadium ions is responsible for conduction. It could be assumed that the presence of other components in glasses, such as alkali metal cation Li+, also contributes significantly to the overall electrical conductivity of glasses due to their lower charges and smaller sizes. Assuming that the motion of alkali ions and polarons hopping is independent of each other, one may expect electrical conduction to increase with the content of alkali ions in the system. Strong anomalies in conductivity at a certain amount of alkali are also reported.23 Alkali ion doped materials usually show a mixed conductivity, such as polaronic, electronic, and ionic conductivity, with respect to temperature.24,25 The ionic conductivity in alkali and alkaline earth containing borosilicate glasses is driven by the alkali content. It is expected that single-charged alkali ions will have higher diffusivities and simpler ion intercalation in comparison with alkaline earth ions. Different ionic radii and charges cause the site to rearrange and produce inherent flaws, which could be caused by the mixed cation effect.

In the present study, an attempt has been made to synthesize magnesium containing V2O5 glasses to promote the conduction of cathode materials in VRFBs. Moreover, these glasses can be used as a cathode material in lithium-ion batteries and rechargeable magnesium ion batteries.26,27 In this study, the addition of Li2O in place of MgO and its effects on physical, thermal, structural, and electrical properties of V2O5–MgO glasses and glass ceramics are reported.

The composition of 75V2O5–(25-x) MgO–xLi2O (x = 0, 1.5, 3.0, 4.5, 6.0) was synthesized by the melt quenching process. A stoichiometric amount of V2O5, MgO, and Li2O (mol. %) was taken and mixed using an agate mortar and pestle. The purity of all chemicals was 98%–99%. They were melted in re-crystallized alumina crucibles at 900 °C in an electric furnace. The melt was held at 900 °C for 0.5 h to increase the diffusivity among various ingredients present in the composition. Furthermore, the melts were quenched in air using two heavy copper plates. The as-quenched samples were labeled as MVL-0 (x = 0), MVL-1.5 (x = 1.5), MVL-3.0 (x = 3.0), MVL-4.5 (x = 4.5), and MVL-6.0 (x = 6.0). The standard Archimedes technique was used to determine the density (ρ) of the as-quenched sample at room temperature with xylene as the immersing liquid at 25 °C. The molar volume (Vm) was determined via Vm = M/ρ (where M is the molecular weight of the composition). The x-ray diffraction (XRD) of powdered samples was taken in the angular range of 10°–80° with a scanning speed of 10° min−1, and the step size is 0.01 on a SmartLab SE with Cu-Kα radiation (λ = 1.54 Å). The as-quenched powdered samples were subjected to differential thermal analysis (DTA) measurements using a Pyris Diamond system (PerkinElmer) in a N2 atmosphere at a heating rate of 10 °C min−1 from room temperature to 800 °C. The Raman spectra of the powder sample were measured using a LabRAM HR Evolution Raman spectrometer with an excitation wavelength of 532 nm. For conductivity measurements, the samples were dried at 150 °C for 1 h in an oven; after that, both sides of the as-quenched samples were coated with Au using a 3000FC auto-fine coater from JEOL. A Solartron impedance analyzer (Model TSVHI2/50/305) was used to measure the impedance of the quenched samples at RT–250 °C. The voltage was set to ±1 V, while the frequency was maintained between 102 and 106 Hz. The temperature was raised from the ambient temperature to 250 °C in steps of 10 °C. The temperature controller’s lowest count was 1 °C. Before performing any impedance measurements, the furnace was kept at a set temperature to provide adequate temperature stability.

The density of the as-prepared samples was determined at room temperature by the Archimedes method using xylene (ρxl = 0.863 g/cm3) as an immersion fluid. The glass samples were weighed in air and then weighed in xylene. The following equation was used to compute the density experimentally:28 
dexp=Wair×ρxlWairWxl.
(2)
To determine the relative density of the as-prepared samples, the theoretical density was also calculated using the following equation:29,30
dth=xiMixiMiρi,
(3)
where xi denotes the molar fraction of the oxides present in the sample, Mi denotes the molar mass, and ρi denotes their theoretical densities (ρv2O5 = 3.36 g/cm3, ρMgO = 3.58 g/cm3, and ρLi2O = 2.01 g/cm3). From the above-mentioned equations, theoretical and experimental densities are calculated and given in Table I. Interestingly, the experimental density increases with the substitution of MgO by Li2O in the present samples. However, the molar weight of Li2O is lower than that of MgO. It could be possible that depolarization enhanced by Li2O in the glass network may increase the packing of local structural units. The increment in the packing of structural units decreases the overall volume of the sample, which, in turn, could cause an enhancement in density with the increasing amount of Li2O in the present sample. In addition, the formation of crystalline phases in glass matrix is responsible for increasing the density. The following equation describes the molar volume, which is filled with 1 mol. % of the material:13,
Vm=Mρ,
(4)
where M denotes the molecular weight of the glasses and ρ denotes their density. In case of modifiers, Li+ ions will fill the network gaps and may increase the packing of structural units.31 As a result, less open space within the glass building will be vacant. These findings are in line with earlier findings for glasses and glass ceramics.32–34 The lower molar weight of Li2O compared to MgO is responsible for decreasing the molar volume of the samples. Based on this, it can be concluded that the enhanced concentration of Li2O decreases the molar volume but increases the density as shown in Fig. 1.
TABLE I.

Various physical parameters, i.e., experimental density (ρexp.), theoretical density (ρthr), molar volume (Vm), inter-ionic concentration (N), and interatomic radii (R) of the samples.

Sample idρexp. (g/cm3)ρthr (g/cm3)Vm(103 × cm3)NLi(×10−4) Å−1NMg(×104) Å−1RLi (Å)RMg (Å)
MVL-0 2.57 3.37 5.69 ⋯ 20.5 ⋯ 7.89 
MVL-1.5 2.63 3.37 5.56 1.62 19.3 18.23 8.04 
MVL-3.0 2.75 3.36 5.32 3.40 18.1 14.27 8.20 
MVL-4.5 2.89 3.34 5.05 5.36 16.9 12.27 8.41 
MVL-6.0 2.91 3.34 5.01 7.21 15.7 11.14 8.61 
Sample idρexp. (g/cm3)ρthr (g/cm3)Vm(103 × cm3)NLi(×10−4) Å−1NMg(×104) Å−1RLi (Å)RMg (Å)
MVL-0 2.57 3.37 5.69 ⋯ 20.5 ⋯ 7.89 
MVL-1.5 2.63 3.37 5.56 1.62 19.3 18.23 8.04 
MVL-3.0 2.75 3.36 5.32 3.40 18.1 14.27 8.20 
MVL-4.5 2.89 3.34 5.05 5.36 16.9 12.27 8.41 
MVL-6.0 2.91 3.34 5.01 7.21 15.7 11.14 8.61 
FIG. 1.

Variation in density and molar volume of MVL-0, MVL-1.5, MVL-3.0, MVL-4.5, and MVL-6.0.

FIG. 1.

Variation in density and molar volume of MVL-0, MVL-1.5, MVL-3.0, MVL-4.5, and MVL-6.0.

Close modal
As shown in Fig. 1, the density and molar volume both deviate from linearity at higher concentrations of Li2O. It could be associated with the higher crystalline nature of MVL-6 sample since it is a glass ceramic as discussed in Sec. III B. The following relationship has also been used to compute the ionic concentration (N) and the inter-ionic distance (R), and the results are shown in Table I:35 
N=6.022×1023×mol.%ofcation×valencyVm,
(5)
R =1N1/3.
(6)

The ionic concentration is seen to increase with the Li2O content, while the interatomic distance between cation and anion decreases. The glass network is altered by Li2O, which also boosts iconicity. As the covalency leads to an increase in density and the structure becomes more compact due to the evolution of crystalline phases, the molar volume of the samples decreases.34  Table I shows the change in ionic concentration (Ni) and the inter-ionic distance (Ri) with Li2O concentration.

The XRD patterns of the as-prepared samples are presented in Fig. 2. The MVL-0, MVL-1.5, and MVL-3.0 samples exhibit a completely amorphous nature. In the case of MVL-4.5, some broad and pronounced humps are observed. Meanwhile, in the case of MVL-6.0, some fully resolved XRD peaks embedded in the glassy matrix are observed. These XRD peaks were indexed with orthogonal Mg0.01V2O5 (ICCD card no. 01-089-0610) having Pmn21 space group and monoclinic Li1.2V3O8 (ICCD card no. 01-080-0071) having P21/m space group. Moreover, the stoichiometry of the formed crystalline phases in MVL-6.0 indicated that the vanadium is in mixed oxidation states. The stoichiometric chemical formula of these crystalline phases is satisfied only when the vanadium is in mixed states. According to the XRD analysis, replacing MgO with Li2O in the current system increases the devitrification in glasses. Similar outcomes were seen in our earlier research paper on samples that contained Li2O and V2O5.35 

FIG. 2.

X-ray diffraction pattern of (a) MVL-0, (b) MVL-1.5, (c) MVL-3.0, (d) MVL-4.5, and (e) MVL-6.0.

FIG. 2.

X-ray diffraction pattern of (a) MVL-0, (b) MVL-1.5, (c) MVL-3.0, (d) MVL-4.5, and (e) MVL-6.0.

Close modal

Li2O breaks down the bridging oxygen in the network former by a chemical reaction, creating NBOs. This chemical reaction shortens the average length of the macromolecular chains. When the amount of modifier is increased, the glass becomes less stable and the glass transition temperature decreases in silicate or borosilicate glasses.36 

Sharp crystallization and melting occur in the case of the MVL-0 sample as shown in Fig. 3. A dip around 266 °C confirms the glass transition temperature of MVL-0 glass. In the case of MVL-1.5, MVL-3.0, and MVL-4.5, the two exothermic peaks (Tc1 and Tc2) confirm that Li2O addition may induce phase separation in the samples. This phase separation alters the properties and induces non-linearity in the glass.37 Among these two peaks, Tc1 is more intense in all the samples; this peak is used to deduce other thermal parameters. Furthermore, two or more melting peaks are also observed in these glasses, which correspond to the melting of different crystalline phases or different glass matrices at different temperatures. This tendency is more pronounced in the MVL-6.0 sample since it has two crystalline phases with an amorphous matrix. From the above-mentioned results, it can be concluded that the substitution of MgO by Li2O leads to devitrification in the glasses and forms crystalline phases along the glass matrix.

FIG. 3.

DTA thermograph of the samples recorded with 10 °C heating rate.

FIG. 3.

DTA thermograph of the samples recorded with 10 °C heating rate.

Close modal

In addition, Tc − Tg, a measure of the capacity to create glass, decreases with the increase in Li2O, whereas Tm − Tc increases. The values of both the factors indicate a poor capacity to create glass with Li2O content, as shown in Table II. Furthermore, the glass forming efficiency parameter, i.e., Hruby’s parameter (Tc − Tg/Tm − Tc), was computed. MVL-0 has the highest value of Hruby’s parameter, which suggests the highest glass forming ability as compared to other samples in the present system. This observation is also confirmed in the XRD pattern of these samples.

TABLE II.

Thermal parameters of MVL-samples obtained from DTA thermographs, where Tg represents the glass transition temperature, Tc represents the crystallization temperature, Tm represents the melting temperature, F represents the thermodynamic fragility index, and Hr represents the Hruby parameter.

Sample idTgTcTm∆TgFTc − TgTm − TcTcTgTmTc
MVL-0 266.62 341.31 656.36 16.28 0.41 74.69 315.05 0.23 
MVL-1.5 262.33 306.04 649.49 22.10 0.28 43.71 343.45 0.13 
337.53 
MVL-3.0 251.48 295.19 582.48 23.14 0.24 43.70 350.31 0.12 
324.98 645.50 
MVL-4.5 247.62 280.18 586.52 23.20 0.25 32.56 294.62 0.11 
314.11 613.88 
MVL-6.0 ⋯ 266.62 588.85 ⋯ ⋯ ⋯ 319.03 ⋯ 
306.66 640.63 
Sample idTgTcTm∆TgFTc − TgTm − TcTcTgTmTc
MVL-0 266.62 341.31 656.36 16.28 0.41 74.69 315.05 0.23 
MVL-1.5 262.33 306.04 649.49 22.10 0.28 43.71 343.45 0.13 
337.53 
MVL-3.0 251.48 295.19 582.48 23.14 0.24 43.70 350.31 0.12 
324.98 645.50 
MVL-4.5 247.62 280.18 586.52 23.20 0.25 32.56 294.62 0.11 
314.11 613.88 
MVL-6.0 ⋯ 266.62 588.85 ⋯ ⋯ ⋯ 319.03 ⋯ 
306.66 640.63 
The dynamics of a material slow down when it cools to the glass transition temperature, which is connected to thermodynamic fragility. Glasses with a lower Tg range have higher fragility, and vice versa. The following relationship is also used to compute thermodynamic fragility (F), which is shown in Table II:
F=0.151Tg/Tg0.151+Tg/Tg.
(7)

Using Eq. (7), it was determined that the thermodynamic fragility decreased with the increase in Li2O concentration, as shown in Table II.

Furthermore, the results of XRD and DTA are confirmed using a field emission scanning electron microscope (FESEM). Figure 4 shows some particles embedded in the glass matrix. It confirms the formation of crystalline phases along with the glass matrix in the MVL-6.0 sample.

FIG. 4.

FESEM image representing MVL-6.0 as a glass ceramic.

FIG. 4.

FESEM image representing MVL-6.0 as a glass ceramic.

Close modal

Figure 6 exhibits some broad bands, and shoulder bands are observed in the case of MVL-0, MVL-1.5, MVL-3.0, and MVL-4.5, which could be attributed to the glassy structure. These shoulder bands were not observed in the case of the MVL-6 sample. Rather, some sharp peaks were observed in this particular sample, which correspond to the crystalline nature. The Raman spectra show bands around 144 (B1g), 283 (B2g), 412 (Ag), 492 (Ag), 529 (Ag), 639 (Ag), 699 (Ag), 839(A3g), 998(A3g), and 1016 cm−1(A3g). Among the Raman modes mentioned, 529 and 699 cm−1 belong to V–O3 and V–O2, respectively. Due to the difference in composition, some shifting was also observed in the position of the bands and their intensity. A broad diffused peak was observed around 999 and 1016 cm−1 in the case of MVL-1.5, MVL-3.0, and MVL-4.5 samples. In contrast, MVL-6.0 sample has a significant and sharp peak at 998 cm−1. The sharp Raman band was related to a stable V–O1 bond.38,39 The major Raman band was related to the terminal oxygen stretching mode.40,41 The V–O1, V–O2, and V–O3 Raman band intensities increase with the increase in the concentration of Li2O. At lower concentrations of Li2O, there is a doubled Raman band in this region, and with increasing Li2O concentrations, this band is converted into a single Raman band. These observations are found to be in agreement with the earlier results in terms of stoichiometry and structural quality.40,41 In the vanadate system, the V5+ = O stretching mode of terminal oxygen was often assigned to a band between 960 and 1000 cm−1.42 The intensity of this band increases with Li2O content because this leads to the multilayer formation of V2O5.43 In addition, an alternative proof is offered to support the formation of flawed crystal structures to transform into stable crystal structures. Lower valence state vanadium is developed in the unit cell i.e. V–O1. The Raman band positions with the increasing concentration of Li2O are presented in Fig. 5. The lower wavenumber shifts may associate with the oxidation of the valance states of cation (V4+ to V5+) and convert NBOs to BOs. In addition, it is the induction of the creation of various polyhedra rather than the actual crystal structure polyhedra.44 An increase in intensity with respect to increasing concentration of Li2O demonstrated the ordering in the samples.

FIG. 5.

Raman shift with respect to change in the concentration of V2O5.

FIG. 5.

Raman shift with respect to change in the concentration of V2O5.

Close modal

A broad shoulder band was observed at around 839 cm−1, which was relevant to isolated VO4 tetrahedral structural units on the surface of the sample, which was related to the symmetric stretching mode (VO2).45 Bands in this area were used to analyze the amorphous V2O5. However, no such band is observed in the case of MVL-6.0 as crystallization occurs in this case, which may be associated with different oxidation states of vanadium. So, instead of vanadium in V5+, it exists in a number of different oxidation states in MVL-6.0. A small shoulder band around 639 cm−1 was also observed in MVL-0, MVL-1.5, MVL-3.0, and MVL-4.5. However, it is absent in the case of MVL-6.0. This band was mostly caused by oxygen ions stretching and vibrating while bridging between the three vandal centers.38,39

The stretching of Li–O may possibly be the cause of the band at 412 cm−1. The surface vanadyl group’s deformation mode is represented by a band at 283 cm−1. Around 492 cm−1, there is a shoulder band that is connected to the stretching vibration of the V–O–V band in V2O5.38,39 With the increase in the concentration of Li2O, this band split up into two peaks: one at 492 cm−1 and another at 529 cm−1, which is explained by the presence of the crystalline V2O5 distinctive layer structure as shown in Fig. 6 for the MVL-6.0 sample. The band at 144 cm−1 was associated with the [VO5] vibration and strongly accompanied by a layered structure, which was observed at a lower wavenumber due to the heavy [VO5] unit.46 So, the presence of different bands corresponding to different structural units in the MVL-6.0 sample as compared to other samples confirms that with the increase in the concentration of Li2O, crystalline nature increases and different crystalline phases are formed. These results are also confirmed by XRD analysis and DTA of these samples.

FIG. 6.

Raman spectra of (a) MVL-0, (b) MVL-1.5, (c) MVL-3.0, (d) MVL-4.5, and (e) MVL-6.0.

FIG. 6.

Raman spectra of (a) MVL-0, (b) MVL-1.5, (c) MVL-3.0, (d) MVL-4.5, and (e) MVL-6.0.

Close modal

Based on the XRD, DTA, and Raman spectra, the mechanisms shown in Fig. 7 are proposed for the present samples. Different polyhedra are responsible for nucleating the different crystalline phases with increasing concentrations of Li2O.

FIG. 7.

Change in network structure of V2O5 with the addition of alkaline earth metal oxide and alkali metal oxide.

FIG. 7.

Change in network structure of V2O5 with the addition of alkaline earth metal oxide and alkali metal oxide.

Close modal
The complex impedance plots may be divided into two categories. The semicircle arc and spike or short straight lines are the outcomes obtained from the two separate methods, i.e., conduction and polarization, respectively. The nature of these two peaks aids in identifying the bulk conductivity response caused by electron hopping and the effect near the electrode, which are the samples’ electrical responses. The complex impedance (Z* = Z′ − jZ″) has real (Z′) and imaginary (Z″) components, which are computed as follows:25,
formula
(8)
formula
(9)
where Co and are the free space capacitance and angular frequency, respectively The Nyquist plots of MVL-0 and MVL-6.0 samples are shown in Fig. 8 as representatives. This image reveals that there is a semicircular part that corresponds to these samples that have varied Li2O concentrations at higher frequencies. This is a sign of the structure’s homogeneity through the bulk effect, which points out to the ionic conductivity occurring in the samples.25 However, the semicircle is a little depressed with increasing concentrations of Li2O. This behavior of suppression may be due to inhomogeneity in the samples and this outcome is consistent with DTA (phase separation) and FESEM results. The characteristics of the sample’s polarization mechanism and conductivity both affect the curve’s form simultaneously. In addition, it has been shown that the curvature of the Nyquist plots is suppressed as the concentration of the glass modifier increases.25,47
FIG. 8.

Nyquist plots at various temperatures of (a) MVL-0 and (b) MVL-6.

FIG. 8.

Nyquist plots at various temperatures of (a) MVL-0 and (b) MVL-6.

Close modal

In the case of MVL-0, an extra-depressed semicircle was also observed, which may correspond to the electrode polarization effect, but with the increase in the concentration of Li2O, this semicircle decreases and becomes more depressed. This is associated with the interfacial impedance that may be caused by the accumulation of Li+ at the electrodes. The equivalent impedance circuit corresponds to the semicircular portion of the plots containing a parallel combination of resistor and capacitor as given in the inset of Fig. 8. The impedance behavior is comparable to a circuit with a parallel-connected resistor and capacitor for polarization.48 The depressed semicircles are toward the Z′ axis. Consequently, a constant phase element (CPE) may be used to replace the capacitor in the equivalent circuit. The resistance is represented as Re in the equivalent circuits as shown in the inset of Fig. 8.

With an increase in temperature, the region beneath the semicircle part of the figure shrinks, indicating that the overall impedance of the samples has decreased. Furthermore, the Nyquist plot suggests that the point of intersection on the Z′ axis shifts toward the origin with the increase in temperature. Moreover, the diameter of the semicircle decreases, resulting in a decrease in resistance and an increase in conductivity. The diameter of the semicircle decreases as temperature increases. It is attributed to an increase in Li+ concentration and mobility of the Li+ ions.

This may be due to an increase in Warburg resistance (Wd), which is related to the diffusion of charge carriers at the interference of the electrode. However, this behavior is not observed in the case of MVL-1.5 glass. The sudden decrease in conductivity observed in this particular glass may be due to the strong interaction between ions and polarons. The generation of polarons and mobile electrons occur when V4+ grab moving electrons are attracted to the Li+ ions with the opposite charge. This newly generated cation–polaron pair moves as a neutral particle. Therefore, the movement of these pairs has no impact on electrical conductivity as a whole. A similar behavior is also observed for sodium molybdenum phosphate glasses.49 

From the Nyquist plots, it is observed that for the MVL-6.0 sample, the area under semicircular plot increases, which suggests that the impedance increases. It could be related to inhomogeneity in this sample created by the power of two crystalline phases along with an amorphous matrix in Fig. 2.

Semicircle depicts interfacial effects at lower frequencies, while at higher frequencies, it reflects the involvement of bulk conductivity.50 The radius of semicircles shrinks as temperature increases, indicating that the current samples’ ac conductivity was a thermally stimulated process. Higher temperatures cause the thermal migration of ions to speed up, which lowers conductivity. The mobility of modifying ions (especially monovalent alkali ions such as Li+) was the main factor for determining the electrical conductivity of the glasses and glass ceramics.51 The conductivity of glasses and glass ceramics is additionally influenced by network stiffness, size, charge, mobility, cation concentration, porosity, and other parameters.52 

Furthermore, the Arrhenius plots were used to determine the activation energies as well as the types of conductors in the present samples. The temperature dependent conductivity follows the Arrhenius equation as given in Refs. 52 and 53.

The slope of ln σT vs 1000/T of the Arrhenius plot is attributed to the change in the charge carriers with an increase in the temperature. The Arrhenius plot is used to calculate the activation energy (Fig. 9) by linear fitting. The graph indicated that activation energies varied between high- and low-temperature zones, as shown in Table III.

FIG. 9.

Arrhenius plots of the samples MVL-0 and MVL-6.0.

FIG. 9.

Arrhenius plots of the samples MVL-0 and MVL-6.0.

Close modal
TABLE III.

Conductivity and activation energy of all the prepared samples at low and high temperatures, respectively.

Sample idConductivity (S cm−1) RTEa2 (eV) (50–150 °C)Conductivity (S cm−1) 250 °CEa1 (eV) (150–250 °C)
MVL-0 2.48 × 10−6 0.23 1.23 × 10−4 0.38 
MVL-1.5 5.68 × 10−7 0.28 5.75 × 10−5 0.40 
MVL-3.0 1.64 × 10−6 0.30 2.53 × 10−4 0.52 
MVL-4.5 3.26 × 10−6 0.31 4.32 × 10−4 0.64 
MVL-6.0 3.72 × 10−8 0.31 7.95 × 10−6 0.65 
Sample idConductivity (S cm−1) RTEa2 (eV) (50–150 °C)Conductivity (S cm−1) 250 °CEa1 (eV) (150–250 °C)
MVL-0 2.48 × 10−6 0.23 1.23 × 10−4 0.38 
MVL-1.5 5.68 × 10−7 0.28 5.75 × 10−5 0.40 
MVL-3.0 1.64 × 10−6 0.30 2.53 × 10−4 0.52 
MVL-4.5 3.26 × 10−6 0.31 4.32 × 10−4 0.64 
MVL-6.0 3.72 × 10−8 0.31 7.95 × 10−6 0.65 

For ionic conductors, the activation energy typically ranges from 0.9 to 1.5 eV.54,55 Below this range, glasses and glass ceramics may have mixed conduction (electronic + ionic) followed by predominantly electronic conductivity at lower temperature regions. The calculated activation by the Arrhenius plot lies in the range of 0.38–0.60 eV for the present samples. These activation energy values suggest that the present samples exhibit mixed conductivity. Vanadium ions exist in different oxidation states and act as localized hoping centers in the present samples. Electrical conduction changes at higher temperatures as a result of structural modifications, such as crystalline phase transitions or the reduction/oxidation of the transition ions. As a result, non-linearity was observed in the Arrhenius plots of the present samples.

The replacement of MgO by Li2O increases the tendency of devitrification and phase separation in the present glasses. The evolution of crystalline phases in glass network with Li2O content increases the density of samples with decreasing molar volume. The chemical formula of crystalline phases indicated that vanadium is in a mixed oxidation state in the present samples. The Raman spectra confirmed the presence of different structural units of V2O5 in the samples. The current samples exhibit two types of conduction mechanisms at high temperatures (150–250 °C) where ionic conduction predominates; however, at lower temperatures, electronic conduction dominates. The highest conductivity (4.32 × 10−4 S cm−1) is observed for MVL-4.5 at 250 °C. All samples exhibit mixed conduction with good conductivity in the required range of cathode materials for possible battery application and act as electrolytes in rechargeable vanadium redox flow batteries.

This work received financial support from Thapar Institute of Engineering and Technology (TIET), Patiala. The authors acknowledge the DST-TIET for providing mutual characterization facilities under the FIST-II scheme. The authors thank Mr. Santosh Kumar for his valuable suggestions and discussion. This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

The authors have no conflicts to disclose.

Vimi Dua: Data curation (equal); Formal analysis (equal); Investigation (equal); Methodology (equal); Visualization (equal); Writing – original draft (equal); Writing – review & editing (equal). K. Singh: Conceptualization (equal); Investigation (equal); Supervision (equal).

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

1.
I. H.
Ismailzade
,
A. I.
Alecberov
,
R. M.
Ismailov
,
D. A.
Rzayev
, and
I. M.
Aliyez
, “
A new ferroelectric-semiconductor V2O5
,”
Ferroelectrics
23
(
1
),
47
49
(
1980
).
2.
A.
Ghosh
, “
Memory switching in bismuth-vanadate glasses
,”
J. Appl. Phys.
64
(
5
),
2652
2655
(
1988
).
3.
Y.
Wang
,
S.
Wang
,
M.
Xiao
,
D.
Han
, and
Y.
Meng
, “
Preparation and characterization of a novel layer-by-layer porous composite membrane for vanadium redox flow battery (VRB) applications
,”
Int. J. Hydrogen Energy
39
(
28
),
16088
16095
(
2014
).
4.
J.
Cao
,
D.
Zhang
,
Y.
Yue
,
T.
Pakornchote
,
T.
Bovornratanaraks
,
M.
Sawangphruk
,
X.
Zhang
, and
J.
Qin
, “
Revealing the impacts of oxygen defects on Zn2+ storage performance in V2O5
,”
Mater. Today Energy
21
,
100824
(
2021
).
5.
K.
Schneider
, “
Optical properties and electronic structure of V2O5, V2O3, and VO2
,”
J. Mater. Sci.: Mater. Electron.
31
(
13
),
10478
10488
(
2020
).
6.
G.
Hägg
, “
The vitreous state
,”
J. Chem. Phys.
3
(
1
),
42
49
(
1935
).
7.
H. E.
Roscoe
, “
I. The Bakerian lecture—Researches on vanadium
,”
Philos. Trans. R. Soc. London
158
,
1
27
(
1868
).
8.
S.
Khan
and
K.
Singh
, “
Effect of MgO on structural, thermal and conducting properties of V2−xMgxO5−δ (x = 0.05–0.30) systems
,”
Ceram. Int.
45
(
1
),
695
701
(
2019
).
9.
A.
Aronne
,
L.
Depero
,
V.
Sigaev
,
P.
Pernice
,
E.
Bontempi
,
O.
Akimova
, and
E.
Fanelli
, “
Structure and crystallization of potassium titanium phosphate glasses containing B2O3 and SiO2
,”
J. Non-Cryst. Solids
324
,
208
219
(
2003
).
10.
P. F.
Moulton
, “
Spectroscopic and laser characteristics of Ti:Al2O3
,”
Appl. Opt.
3
(
1
),
125
133
(
1986
).
11.
A.
Tsuzuki
,
K.
Kani
,
K.
Watari
, and
Y.
Torii
, “
Properties of the glasses prepared by rapid quenching in the V2O5-MO(M = Mg, Ca and Ba) system
,”
J. Mater. Sci.
28
(
15
),
4063
4067
(
1993
).
12.
J. K.
Higgins
,
B. K.
Temple
, and
J. E.
Lewis
, “
Electrical properties of vanadate-glass threshold switches
,”
J. Non-Cryst. Solids
23
(
2
),
187
215
(
1977
).
13.
S.
Sen
and
A.
Ghosh
, “
Polaronic transport properties of some vanadate glasses: Effect of alkali-earth oxide modifiers
,”
Phys. Rev. B
60
(
22
),
15143
15149
(
1999
).
14.
S.
Stalin
,
D. K.
Gaikwad
,
M. A.
Samee
,
A.
Edukondalu
,
S. K.
Ahmmad
,
A. A.
Joshi
, and
R.
Syed
, “
Structural, optical features and Gamma ray shielding properties of Bi2O3–TeO2–B2O3–GeO2 glass system
,”
Ceram. Int.
46
(
11
),
17325
17334
(
2020
).
15.
R.
Punia
,
R. S.
Kundu
,
J.
Hooda
,
S.
Dhankhar
,
S.
Dahiya
, and
N.
Kishore
, “
Effect of Bi2O3 on structural, optical, and other physical properties of semiconducting zinc vanadate glasses
,”
J. Appl. Phys.
110
(
3
),
033527
(
2011
).
16.
V.
Raut
,
A.
Deshpande
, and
N.
Satpute
, “
Effect of V2O5 on the properties of lithium bismuth borate glasses
,”
Solid State Ionics
1495
,
012033
012041
(
2020
).
17.
R. N.
Vannier
,
E.
Pernot
,
M.
Anne
,
O.
Isnard
,
G.
Nowogrocki
, and
G.
Mairesse
,
Solid State Ionics
(
Elsevier
,
2003
), pp.
147
153
.
18.
A.
Prasad
and
A.
Basu
, “
Dielectric and impedance properties of sintered magnesium aluminum silicate glass-ceramic
,”
J. Adv. Ceram.
2
(
1
),
71
78
(
2013
).
19.
S.
Sen
and
A.
Ghosh
, “
Structure and other physical properties of magnesium vanadate glasses
,”
J. Non-Cryst. Solids
258
(
1–3
),
29
33
(
1999
).
20.
S.
Sen
and
A.
Ghosh
, “
Structural properties of strontium vanadate glasses
,”
J. Mater. Res.
15
(
4
),
995
999
(
2000
).
21.
T.
Yoshida
and
Y.
Matsuno
, “
The electronic conduction of glass and glass ceramics containing various transition metal oxides
,”
J. Non-Cryst. Solids
38–39
(
PART 1
),
341
346
(
1980
).
22.
A.
Al-Hajry
,
A.
Al-Shahrani
, and
M. M.
El-Desoky
, “
Structural and other physical properties of barium vanadate glasses
,”
Mater. Chem. Phys.
95
(
2–3
),
300
306
(
2006
).
23.
S.
Gupta
and
K.
Singh
, “
γ-Phase stabilized Bi4BaxV2−xO11−δ (0.0 ≤ x ≤ 0.20): Structural, thermal and conducting properties
,”
Solid State Ionics
278
,
233
238
(
2015
).
24.
I.
Jlassi
,
N.
Sdiri
, and
H.
Elhouichet
, “
Electrical conductivity and dielectric properties of MgO doped lithium phosphate glasses
,”
J. Non-Cryst. Solids
466–467
(
2016
),
45
51
(
2017
).
25.
I.
Kashif
,
S. A.
Rahman
,
A. A.
Soliman
,
E. M.
Ibrahim
,
E. K.
Abdel-Khalek
,
A. G.
Mostafa
, and
A. M.
Sanad
, “
Effect of alkali content on AC conductivity of borate glasses containing two transition metals
,”
Physica B
404
(
21
),
3842
3849
(
2009
).
26.
T.
Feng
,
Y.
Hu
,
L.
Xu
,
J.
Huang
,
S.
Hu
,
L.
Zhang
, and
L.
Luo
, “
Improving the cyclability of solid polymer electrolyte with porous V2O5 nanotube filler
,”
Mater. Today Energy
28
,
101062
(
2022
).
27.
D.
Wu
,
J.
Zeng
,
H.
Hua
,
J.
Wu
,
Y.
Yang
, and
J.
Zhao
, “
NaV6O15: A promising cathode material for insertion/extraction of Mg2+ with excellent cycling performance
,”
Nano Res.
13
(
2
),
335
343
(
2020
).
28.
A.
Maaroufi
,
O.
Oabi
,
G.
Pinto
,
M.
Ouchetto
,
R.
Benavente
, and
J. M.
Pereña
, “
Electrical conductivity of new zinc phosphate glass/metal composites
,”
J. Non-Cryst. Solids
358
(
20
),
2764
2770
(
2012
).
29.
Y. D.
Yiannopoulos
,
C. P. E.
Varsamis
, and
E. I.
Kamitsos
,
J. Non-Cryst. Solids
293–295
,
244
249
(
2001
).
30.
D. S.
Brauer
,
A.
Al-Noaman
,
R. G.
Hill
, and
H.
Doweidar
, “
Density-structure correlations in fluoride-containing bioactive glasses
,”
Mater. Chem. Phys.
130
(
1–2
),
121
125
(
2011
).
31.
V.
Kundu
,
R. L.
Dhiman
,
A. S.
Maan
, and
D. R.
Goyal
, “
Structural and physical properties of Fe2O3–B2O3–V2O5 glasses
,”
Adv. Condens. Matter Phys.
2008
,
937054
.
32.
S. K.
Arya
and
K.
Singh
, “
Structural and optical properties of 30Li2O–55B2O3–5ZnO–xTiO2–(10 − X)V2O5, (0 ≤ x ≤ 10) glasses
,”
J. Non-Cryst. Solids
414
,
51
58
(
2015
).
33.
A.
Bhogi
,
P. K.
Pothuganti
, and
P.
Kistaiah
, in
AIP Conference Proceedings
(
American Institute of Physics Inc.
,
2020
).
34.
N.
Pujari
,
K.
Birampally
,
A.
Edukondalu
, and
C. P.
Vardhani
, “
Effect of Li2O content on structural and optical properties of Li2O–TeO2–As2O3–B2O3 glasses
,”
J. Phys. Chem. Solids
148
,
109627
(
2021
).
35.
S.
Khan
and
K.
Singh
, “
Structural, optical, thermal and conducting properties of V2−xLixO5−δ (0.15 ≤ x ≤ 0.30) systems
,”
Sci. Rep.
10
,
1089
1100
(
2020
).
36.
J.-L.
Souquet
and
M.
Duclot
, “
Batteries: Glassy electrolytes
,”
Encycl. Mater.: Sci. Technol.
2001
,
457
462
(
2001
).
37.
A.
Veber
,
Z.
Lu
,
M.
Vermillac
,
F.
Pigeonneau
,
W.
Blanc
, and
L.
Petit
, “
Nano-structured optical fibers made of glass-ceramics, and phase separated and metallic particle-containing glasses
,”
Fibers
7
(
12
),
105
134
(
2019
).
38.
A.
Lazauskas
,
L.
Marcinauskas
, and
M.
Andrulevicius
, “
Modification of graphene oxide/V2O5·nH2O nanocomposite films via direct laser irradiation
,”
ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces
12
(
16
),
18877
18884
(
2020
).
39.
S. H.
Lee
,
H. M.
Cheong
,
M. J.
Seong
,
P.
Liu
,
C. E.
Tracy
,
A.
Mascarenhas
,
J. R.
Pitts
, and
S. K.
Deb
,
Solid State Ionics
165
(
1–4
),
111
116
(
2003
).
40.
A.
Grzechnik
, “
Local structures in high pressure phases of V2O5
,”
Chem. Mater.
10
(
9
),
2505
2509
(
1998
).
41.
Q.
Wang
,
M.
Brier
,
S.
Joshi
,
A.
Puntambekar
, and
V.
Chakrapani
, “
Defect-induced Burstein–Moss shift in reduced V2O5 nanostructures
,”
Phys. Rev. B
94
(
24
),
245305
(
2016
).
42.
P.
Shvets
,
O.
Dikaya
,
K.
Maksimova
, and
A.
Goikhman
, “
A review of Raman spectroscopy of vanadium oxides
,”
J. Raman Spectrosc.
50
(
8
),
1226
1244
(
2019
).
43.
R.
Iordanova
,
V.
Dimitrov
,
Y.
Dimitriev
, and
D.
Klissurski
, “
Glass formation and structure of glasses in the V2O5MoO3Bi2O3 system
,”
J. Non-Cryst. Solids
180
(
1
),
58
65
(
1994
).
44.
V.
Swamy
,
A.
Kuznetsov
,
L. S.
Dubrovinsky
,
P. F.
McMillan
,
V. B.
Prakapenka
,
G.
Shen
, and
B. C.
Muddle
, “
Size-dependent pressure-induced amorphization in nanoscale TiO2
,”
Phys. Rev. Lett.
96
(
13
),
135702
(
2006
).
45.
N.
Kerkouri
,
M.
Et-Tabirou
,
A.
Chahine
,
A.
Mazzah
,
M. C.
Dhamelincourt
, and
M.
Taibi
, “
DSC and spectroscopic studies of the structure of V2O5–CdO–P2O5 glasses
,”
J. Optoelectron. Adv. Mater.
12
(
5
),
1030
1034
(
2010
).
46.
S.
Zhan
,
Y.
Wei
,
X.
Bie
,
C.
Wang
,
F.
Du
,
G.
Chen
, and
F.
Hu
, “
Structural and electrochemical properties of Al3+ doped V2O5 nanoparticles prepared by an oxalic acid assisted soft-chemical method
,”
J. Alloys Compd.
502
(
1
),
92
96
(
2010
).
47.
E. M.
Masoud
,
M.
Khairy
, and
M. A.
Mousa
, “
Electrical properties of fast ion conducting silver based borate glasses: Application in solid battery
,”
J. Alloys Compd.
569
,
150
155
(
2013
).
48.
A.
Yadav
,
S.
Khasa
,
A.
Hooda
,
M. S.
Dahiya
,
A.
Agarwal
, and
P.
Chand
, “
EPR and impedance spectroscopic investigations on lithium bismuth borate glasses containing nickel and vanadium ions
,”
Spectrochim. Acta, Part A
157
,
129
137
(
2016
).
49.
J. C.
Bazan
,
J. A.
Duffy
,
M. D.
Ingram
, and
M. R.
Mallace
, “
Conductivity anomalies in tungstate-phosphate glasses: Evidence for an ion-polaron interaction?
,”
Solid State Ionics
86–88
(
PART 1
),
497
501
(
1996
).
50.
A.
Langar
,
N.
Sdiri
,
H.
Elhouichet
, and
M.
Ferid
, “
Structure and electrical characterization of ZnO-Ag phosphate glasses
,”
Results Phys.
7
,
1022
1029
(
2017
).
51.
R. J.
Barczyński
and
L.
Murawski
,
Materials Science
(
Material science
,
Poland
,
2006
), Vol. 24, pp.
221
227
.
52.
M. M.
Gomaa
,
H.
Darwish
, and
S. M.
Salman
, “
Electrical properties of some Y2O3 and/or Fe2O3-containing lithium silicate glasses and glass-ceramics
,”
J. Mater. Sci.: Mater. Electron.
19
(
1
),
5
15
(
2008
).
53.
N.
Kaur
,
G.
Kaur
,
S.
Khan
, and
K.
Singh
, “
Conductivity, dielectric, and structural studies of (30 − x) SrO–xBaO–10Al2O3–45SiO2–5B2O3–10Y2O3 (5 ≤ x ≤ 25) glasses
,”
Ionics
24
(
8
),
2343
2353
(
2018
).
54.
S. S.
Danewalia
,
S.
Khan
,
S.
Dhillon
,
N.
Bansal
,
G.
Sharma
, and
K.
Singh
, “
Effect of transition metals (MO-TiO2, MnO2, Fe2O3, and ZnO) on crystallization and electrical conductivity of SiO2–CaO–Na2O–P2O5-based glass-ceramics
,”
Ionics
26
(
6
),
2959
2967
(
2020
).
55.
M.
Rohde
,
I. U. I.
Mohsin
,
C.
Ziebert
, and
H. J.
Seifert
, “
Ionic and thermal transport in Na-ion-conducting ceramic electrolytes
,”
Int. J. Thermophys.
42
(
10
),
136
215
(
2021
).