A synthesis of single crystals of chiral dichalcogenides TM3X6 (T: 3d transition metal, M: Nb or Ta, X: S or Se) remains an intriguing issue for the investigation of emergent quantum properties such as chiral helimagnetism. In this study, we investigated a correlation between the quantity of Cr intercalation x and the magnetic property in single crystals of a chromium (Cr) intercalated chiral disulfide CrxNb3S6 in order to optimize the synthesis condition for the intercalation-controlled single crystals. The magnetic properties, including a magnetic transition temperature Tc, take different values depending on the samples. We systematically grew single crystals of CrxNb3S6 with x ranged from 0.89 to 1.03 and found that the amount of the Cr intercalation x is an essential factor in controlling the magnetic properties of the grown crystals. The magnetization anomaly, which appears in the temperature dependence as evidence of the formation of chiral magnetic soliton lattice (CSL), was observed only in a narrow region of x from 0.98 to 1.03. The single crystals with x being 0.98 and 0.99 showed the CSL behavior with the highest Tc of 133 K. These results indicate that the small number of defects on the sites for T ions dramatically affects the quality of the single crystals in the synthesis of TM3S6. We also discuss the importance of synthesizing enantiopure single crystals of chiral dichalcogenides in order to observe chiral physical properties unique to chiral compounds such as magneto-chiral effect and chiral-induced spin selectivity.

A chiral helimagnetic (CHM) material exhibits a helical magnetic structure with a single handedness. Its formation stems from a competition between symmetric Heisenberg and antisymmetric Dzyaloshinskii–Moriya (DM) exchange interactions. The antisymmetric nature of the DM interaction is strongly coupled to a chiral crystalline structure of chiral helimagnets.1,2 Chiral helimagnets have attracted much attention because of the emergence of nontrivial chiral magnetic textures such as chiral magnetic soliton lattice (CSL)3–7 and chiral magnetic vortices called magnetic Skyrmions.8,9 The presence of such chiral magnetic order unique to chiral helimagnets has been observed via neutron scattering or electron microscopy in the recent decade.10–12 

As envisioned by Dzyaloshinskii, the CSL is a superlattice of chiral spin twists with uniform periodicity, as shown in Fig. 1(a). Under an external magnetic field applied in the direction perpendicular to the helical axis (principal c-axis of the crystal), the harmonic chiral helimagnetic (CHM) order at zero magnetic field transforms into the nonlinear CSL. Importantly, the CSL period can be controlled continuously by the strength of the magnetic field. Another feature is that the CSL exhibits robust phase coherence at macroscopic length scale.12 Because of these intriguing characteristics, the CSL shows a variety of interesting physical responses, as exemplified by giant magnetoresistance (MR), due to the proliferation of magnetic solitons,13 discretization effect of MR,14 presence of a surface barrier for soliton penetration,15 and collective resonant dynamics up to a frequency of sub-terahertz.16 Such coherent, topological, collective nature of the CSL could be utilized for spintronic device applications.17,18

FIG. 1.

Schematic pictures of the chiral magnetic order formed in a chiral helimagnet. (a) Chiral helimagnetic (CHM) order at zero magnetic field and chiral magnetic soliton lattice (CSL) under a magnetic field applied in a direction perpendicular to the helical axis, followed by a forced ferromagnetic (FM) state above a critical field Hc. (b) The chiral soliton chains coupled via an in-plane exchange interaction J, leading to the formation of robust CSL.

FIG. 1.

Schematic pictures of the chiral magnetic order formed in a chiral helimagnet. (a) Chiral helimagnetic (CHM) order at zero magnetic field and chiral magnetic soliton lattice (CSL) under a magnetic field applied in a direction perpendicular to the helical axis, followed by a forced ferromagnetic (FM) state above a critical field Hc. (b) The chiral soliton chains coupled via an in-plane exchange interaction J, leading to the formation of robust CSL.

Close modal

The number of chiral helimagnets hosting the CSL is still limited. One reason comes from the difficulty in synthesizing helimagnetic materials with a suitable chiral crystalline structure. Another reason could be found in how to detect the CSL. The CHM period at zero magnetic field L(0) is determined by the ratio of the Heisenberg exchange interaction J and DM interaction D along the helical axis. L(0) is typically about tens of nanometers or longer, which corresponds to some tenth nanometers inverse or less in a wave-vector k space. Unfortunately, the Q resolution of neutron scattering experiments using a thermal neutron source is not high enough to separate fundamental Bragg and magnetic satellite peaks. Apparently, the CSL has a longer period than the CHM and thus the CSL detection using neutron scattering technique becomes much harder. In this connection, there has been a possibility that some compounds of CHM order might be misinterpreted as those of ferromagnetic order in previous studies.

Transition-metal dichalcogenides are one of the appropriate materials that could host the CSL. More precisely, an intercalation of 3d transition metal ion T into the mother compound MX2 (M: Nb or Ta, X: S or Se), provides a rich variety of magnetic properties. In the case of disulfide, it is known that, depending on the quantity of intercalated T ions, two different compounds, TM4S8 and TM3S6, are synthesized. For clarifying the connection of mother materials, these compounds are sometimes described as T1/4MS2 and T1/3MS2, respectively. The former has an achiral crystalline structure, while the latter has a chiral crystalline structure with a space group P6322. In the literature before the 1980s, it was reported that TM3S6 showed a variety of magnetic behaviors; paramagnetism for TiNb3S6, VNb3S6, TiTa3S6,and VTa3S6, antiferromagnetism for FeNb3S6, CoNb3S6, NiNb3S6, CoTa3S6,and NiTa3S6, and ferromagnetism for CrNb3S6, MnNb3S6, CrTa3S6, MnTa3S6,and FeTa3S6.19–24 In the present study, we mainly focus on CrNb3S6, which is now known as one of the representative chiral helimagnets for hosting the CSL. Interestingly, other chiral physical properties unique to chiral materials such as electrical magneto-chiral effect25 and chiral-induced spin selectivity (CISS)26 are discussed in CrNb3S6.

In earlier studies around the 1970s, CrNb3S6 was reported to show ferromagnetic order.21–24 In the 1980s, Miyadai and Moriya investigated a magnetization process in terms of the formation of the magnetic helix27 They pointed out that it could be interpreted as a formation of the CHM order in CrNb3S6 and directly observed a diffractive satellite peak that corresponds to the CHM structure with 48 nm by means of small angle neutron scattering.28 However, at that time, the field dependence of magnetization was regarded as a discontinuous phase transition between the CHM phase and the forced ferromagnetic one, without taking any intermediate state. Precisely speaking, the magnetization curve changes continuously toward a critical magnetic field Hc, as shown in Fig. 2(a). Such a continuous change of the magnetization should be interpreted as a scenario of CSL formation, which has been properly discussed in the 2000s.7,29,30 Eventually, the CSL was directly observed using Lorentz microscopy.12 

FIG. 2.

Magnetization curves as functions of magnetic field (a) and temperature (b). The data were taken in the presence of magnetic fields applied perpendicular to the helical axis of the CrNb3S6 single crystal that shows the maximum Tc (133 K)in the present study. Arrows in (a) and (b) represent Hc and Tc, respectively.

FIG. 2.

Magnetization curves as functions of magnetic field (a) and temperature (b). The data were taken in the presence of magnetic fields applied perpendicular to the helical axis of the CrNb3S6 single crystal that shows the maximum Tc (133 K)in the present study. Arrows in (a) and (b) represent Hc and Tc, respectively.

Close modal

Direct observation of the CSL revealed unexpected characteristics: the CSL is robust and stable with macroscopic phase coherence. To realize this property, one-dimensional chains of the chiral twists are strongly correlated with each other, as shown in Fig. 1(b). The pitch of the chiral twists is governed by the ratio of J and D along the c-axis, while the coherency arises from an in-plane (ab-plane) ferromagnetic exchange interaction J. In CrNb3S6, the strength of J is as large as the magnetic transition temperature Tc and much larger than J.31 Therefore, the value of Tc could be a good indicator of the phase coherency of the CSL.

Although TM3S6 has been investigated for decades, it is still difficult to control the quantity of intercalated T. In the case of CrNb3S6, the physical properties, including Tc, take different values depending on the samples, as shown in Table I. For example, Parkin reported the ferromagnetic order within the basal plane based on the magnetization of CrNb3S6 with Tc = 120 K.23 Miyadai found the chiral helimagnetism of CrNb3S6 with Tc = 127 K.28 

TABLE I.

A list of physical properties of the CrxNb3S6 single crystals in the literature. The magnetic transition temperature Tc and type of magnetism are summarized together with the amount of Cr intercalation x, which was determined by electron probe microanalysis (EPMA) or single crystal x-ray diffraction. The ferromagnetic or CSL behaviors are categorized by the appearance of the magnetization anomaly in the temperature dependence of magnetization, as shown in Fig. 2(b).

Tc (K)MagnetismAnalysis methodxReference
120 Ferro ⋯ ⋯ Parkin et al.23  
127 CSL ⋯ ⋯ Miyadai et al.28  
128 CSL ⋯ ⋯ Kousaka et al.30  
127 CSL ⋯ ⋯ Togawa et al.12  
122 CSL ⋯ ⋯ Ghimire et al.36  
132 CSL ⋯ ⋯ Togawa et al.13  
92 Ferro X-ray diffraction 0.942 Dyadkin et al.32  
132 CSL ⋯ ⋯ Clements et al.37  
125 Ferro EPMA 0.875 Han et al.33  
123 CSL ⋯ ⋯ Togawa et al.25  
118 Ferro X-ray diffraction 1.000 (3) Hall et al.34  
56 Ferro EPMA 0.99 (12) Mao et al.35  
133 CSL EPMA 0.982 (1) This work 
133 CSL EPMA 0.992 (2) This work 
Tc (K)MagnetismAnalysis methodxReference
120 Ferro ⋯ ⋯ Parkin et al.23  
127 CSL ⋯ ⋯ Miyadai et al.28  
128 CSL ⋯ ⋯ Kousaka et al.30  
127 CSL ⋯ ⋯ Togawa et al.12  
122 CSL ⋯ ⋯ Ghimire et al.36  
132 CSL ⋯ ⋯ Togawa et al.13  
92 Ferro X-ray diffraction 0.942 Dyadkin et al.32  
132 CSL ⋯ ⋯ Clements et al.37  
125 Ferro EPMA 0.875 Han et al.33  
123 CSL ⋯ ⋯ Togawa et al.25  
118 Ferro X-ray diffraction 1.000 (3) Hall et al.34  
56 Ferro EPMA 0.99 (12) Mao et al.35  
133 CSL EPMA 0.982 (1) This work 
133 CSL EPMA 0.992 (2) This work 

When the CrNb3S6 sample shows chiral helimagnetism, the magnetization curve shows a sharp peak as a function of temperature, as shown in Fig. 2(b). However, a monotonous change of the magnetization appears alternatively in the samples of ferromagnetism as reported in the literature.23,32–35 It would be important to examine the sample quality in terms of the quantity of the Cr ions. Some studies evaluated the quantity of defects in the Cr sites by means of quantitative analysis using single crystal x-ray diffraction32,34 and electron probe microanalysis (EPMA).33,35 However, there has been no systematic investigation about a correlation between the defects and the magnetic behavior.

The importance of controlling the quantity of intercalated T can be seen in another example of FeTa3S6 and MnNb3S6. It is known that they show ferromagnetic order at around 40 K.23 However, in some papers,34,38 a coexistence of additional magnetic order was reported to occur at 100 and 160 K in Fe and Mn disulfide compounds, respectively. These values are likely to correspond to the transition temperatures of MnNb4S839 and FeTa4S8.40 Studies using crystals with a smaller Tc and/or those with an impurity phase of TM4S8 may bring confusing results.

In this Research Update, we examine how the quantity of the Cr intercalation influences the magnetic property of single crystals of CrNb3S6 in order to establish a method for growing the intercalation-controlled single crystals. Indeed, we found that the amount of Cr intercalation was an essential factor in controlling the quality of the crystals. In the experiments, we grew single crystals of CrxNb3S6 with x = 0.89 ∼ 1.03 and investigated a correlation between the amount of Cr intercalation and the magnetic property. The magnetization anomaly, which appears in the temperature dependence as evidence of the CSL formation, was observed only in the narrow region of x = 0.98 ∼ 1.03. These results mean that even a small number of defects in T sites in TM3S6 will affect the quality of single crystals significantly.

The crystal structures of the intercalated system of 2H-MS2 depend on the intercalation amount of a 3d transition metal,19,20,22 as shown in Fig. 3. CrNb4S8 forms a centrosymmetric crystal structure with a space group of P63/mmc. It has one Cr atom per four units of NbS2 and the unit cell along the a-axis is twice that of 2H-NbS2, as seen in Fig. 3(c). The location of the Cr atoms differs in CrNb3S6, which forms a chiral crystal structure with a space group of P6322. It has one Cr atom per three units of NbS2, while the unit cell along the a-axis is 3 times longer than that of 2H–NbS2, as shown in Fig. 3(d).

FIG. 3.

Crystal structures of 3d transition metal intercalated niobium disulfides. The structures of (a) CrNb4S8 and (b) CrNb3S6 are respectively illustrated in the side view in (a) and (b), while the ones along the c-axis are given in (c) and (d). Blue, green, and yellow balls represent Cr, Nb, and S atoms, respectively. The unit cell of CrNb3S6 is given by the solid line, while that of CrNb4S8 is drawn by the dashed line.

FIG. 3.

Crystal structures of 3d transition metal intercalated niobium disulfides. The structures of (a) CrNb4S8 and (b) CrNb3S6 are respectively illustrated in the side view in (a) and (b), while the ones along the c-axis are given in (c) and (d). Blue, green, and yellow balls represent Cr, Nb, and S atoms, respectively. The unit cell of CrNb3S6 is given by the solid line, while that of CrNb4S8 is drawn by the dashed line.

Close modal

In CrNb3S6, the Cr ion is normally intercalated at 2c (1/3, 2/3, 1/4) Wyckoff position. However, there are reports19,22 that the Cr ions take the positions of not only 2c, but also 2b (0, 0, 0) and 2d (2/3, 1/3, 1/4). In the case of CrNb3Se6, which has the same structure as that of CrNb3S6, only 5% of Cr occupy Wyckoff 2c position, but 90% occupy Wyckoff 2b (0, 0, 0) position.41 Resultantly, the magnetic structure is not a CHM, but a ferromagnetic one. Similar discussion may hold for CrNb3S6 and MnNb3S6 with smaller Tc. In particular, when CrNb3S6 and MnNb3S6 samples exhibit ferromagnetic behavior in the magnetization without any imprint of the CSL formation, 3d transition metal ions do not fully occupy the 2c position.32,34

The polycrystalline samples of CrxNb3S6, used for single crystal growth afterward, were synthesized by the gas phase method. Powders of Cr, Nb, and S, mixed in a molar ratio of xnominal:3:6, were sealed in an evacuated silica tube. The powder in the silica tube was placed in an electric tube furnace at 1000 °C for a week. Several polycrystalline specimens with xnominal from 1.00 to 1.32 were prepared. The polycrystals were evaluated by powder x-ray diffraction experiments with Cu radiation (Rigaku MultiFlex) and magnetization measurements using a superconducting quantum interference device (SQUID) magnetometer (Quantum Design MPMS-5).

The single crystals were obtained by chemical vapor transport (CVT) technique in a temperature gradient using iodine I2 as the transporting agent. The polycrystalline sample, synthesized with a mixture of Cr, Nb, and S in the molar ratio of xnominal:3:6, was placed at one end of an evacuated silica tube and then heated in the electric tube furnace with a temperature gradient for two weeks. The single crystals were grown at another end of the silica tube located at the lower temperature. As described in the following, the growth condition affects the amount of Cr intercalation and thus the magnetic behavior. The molar ratio of Cr, Nb, and S in a single crystalline sample was determined by quantitative analysis using electron probe microanalyzer (JEOL JXA-8200S). The ZAF correction method (Z: atomic number factor, A: absorption factor, F: characteristic fluorescence correction) using standard specimens of each element was carefully applied to the raw data. To examine the locational variation of the molar ratio in the specimen, EPMA data were obtained in ten different positions in each specimen. Then, the averaged values of the molar ratio were derived for all the specimens together with the error bar including information of the standard deviation between the positions. The amount of Cr intercalation xEPMA in a crystal was determined by the molar ratio between Cr and Nb. As for the amount of S, it took almost the ideal molar ratio of Nb and S. Thus, we discuss the defects on the Cr sites in this study. The magnetic property was evaluated by the magnetization in the presence of small magnetic field orienting in a direction perpendicular to the c-axis using SQUID magnetometers (Quantum Design MPMS-5 and MPMS3).

The powder x-ray diffraction experiments revealed that the polycrystals with xnominal from 1.00 to 1.32 had no impurity phases since all the diffraction peaks in each sample were indexed to the CrNb3S6 structure. The magnetic property was evaluated by the temperature dependence of magnetization. As shown in Fig. 4, all the specimens exhibit ferromagnetic response. The value of Tc of the polycrystal with xnominal = 1.00 is 130 K. Tc decreases with increasing xnominal, and eventually drops down to 30 K when xnominal becomes 1.32. However, super-high-resolution powder neutron diffraction studies with the xnominal = 1.00 specimen exhibit magnetic satellite peaks as evidence of the CHM order.42 Thus, the magnetization measurements with polycrystalline specimens are not useful for identifying the CSL formation in polycrystals and finding the optimum xnominal for single crystal growth.

FIG. 4.

Temperature dependence of magnetization obtained by polycrystals of CrxnominalNb3S6, synthesized with a mixture of Cr, Nb, and S in the molar ratio xnominal:3:6.

FIG. 4.

Temperature dependence of magnetization obtained by polycrystals of CrxnominalNb3S6, synthesized with a mixture of Cr, Nb, and S in the molar ratio xnominal:3:6.

Close modal

As for single crystal growth, single crystals with a hexagonal plate shape were obtained in the growth conditions used in the experiments. The actual amount of Cr intercalation in each specimen was evaluated by EPMA. It was found that the Cr intercalation xEPMA of the single crystal strongly depends on xnominal of the polycrystals as well as on the growth conditions, such as the temperature gradient in the furnaces. Here, to find an appropriate growth condition for obtaining the single crystals of CrNb3S6, we show a growth strategy by optimizing xnominal under a fixed experimental condition of crystal growth. Figure 5 shows the amount of Cr intercalation xEPMA of single crystalline CrxNb3S6 grown from polycrystals with xnominal under the fixed temperature gradient 1100 to 1000 °C. Note that the distance between the highest and lowest temperature locations and the density of I2 inside the silica tube were fixed to be 16 cm long and 5 mg/cm3, respectively.

FIG. 5.

Evaluation of the amount of Cr intercalation x in single crystals of CrxNb3S6. The single crystals were obtained by the CVT technique from polycrystalline samples, synthesized with a mixture of Cr, Nb, and S in the molar ratio xnominal:3:6. Using electron probe microanalysis (EPMA), the Cr intercalation of the single crystal xEPMA was directly determined.

FIG. 5.

Evaluation of the amount of Cr intercalation x in single crystals of CrxNb3S6. The single crystals were obtained by the CVT technique from polycrystalline samples, synthesized with a mixture of Cr, Nb, and S in the molar ratio xnominal:3:6. Using electron probe microanalysis (EPMA), the Cr intercalation of the single crystal xEPMA was directly determined.

Close modal

When the single crystals were grown from polycrystalline samples with xnominal = 1, the xEPMA of the single crystals was 0.933(2), indicating the presence of defects in the Cr sites. xEPMA of the crystals increases in proportion to the xnominal of polycrystals up to xnominal = 1.14 and is nearly saturated at 1.019(3) above it. Judging from the actual composition determined by EPMA analysis, single crystal growth should be performed using polycrystals with xnominal ∼ 1.1 so as to reduce the generation of defects on the Cr sites. Let us note that the linear correlation between xnominal and xEPMA makes it easy to optimize the crystal growth condition. On the other hand, in the case of optimizing the temperature setting in the furnace by using the polycrystals with a fixed value of xnominal, it is difficult to find a good combination of many experimental parameters such as temperature values and gradients at high and low temperature locations and the distance between them. In the present synthesis condition, the obtained crystals exhibit a uniform distribution of Cr over the specimen because the error bars of the Cr amount in the EPMA analyses were quite low as shown below. Typical values were 100 times smaller than those reported by Mao et al.35 shown in Table I. In this respect, the values of error bars are likely to reflect the quality of crystals.

Figure 6(a) shows the temperature dependence of magnetization in single crystals with different xEPMA. Here, a small magnetic field is applied in a direction perpendicular to the c-axis, and the amplitude of the magnetization in each specimen was normalized by the magnetization at 80 K. The single crystals show CSL or ferromagnetic behavior depending on the values of xEPMA. The presence of chiral helimagnetism could be demonstrated by identifying a sharp peak anomaly of the magnetization as a function of temperature,7,30 as shown in Fig. 2. Tc of the chiral helimagnet crystal is defined at a peak top of the magnetization, while Tc of the ferromagnetic order is determined by an extrapolation of the steepest portion of the magnetization toward zero magnetization. The CSL behavior is observed in the crystals with xEPMA from 0.98 to 1.03. The single crystals with xEPMA = 0.982(2) show the CSL response with the highest Tc of 133 K. On the other hand, when the value of xEPMA is a few percent larger or smaller than 1, the ferromagnetic behavior appears with low values of Tc. For example, the single crystal with xEPMA = 0.933(2), obtained from the polycrystal with xnominal = 1, exhibits the ferromagnetic behavior with TC = 102 K. This value is much lower than the values of Tc for chiral helimagnets. Note that, as shown in Fig. 6(b), the amplitude of the magnetization at 80 K in xEPMA = 0.933(2) is 24 times larger than that in xEPMA = 0.982(2). Such a large difference in the magnetization intensity can be regarded as another criterion in distinguishing the ferromagnetic response from the CSL one. For the absolute distinguishing of the CSL and ferromagnetic phases, further diffractive studies using x ray, electron, and neutrons are required, as described below.

FIG. 6.

(a) Temperature dependence of magnetization obtained by single crystals of CrxEPMANb3S6 in small magnetic field applied perpendicular to the c-axis. Cr intercalation xEPMA in each crystal was determined by electron probe microanalysis (EPMA). The data, normalized by the magnetization at 80 K in each MT curve, are given in an arbitrary unit. (b) The magnetization intensity at 80 K obtained by the MT curves in the CrxEPMANb3S6 crystals. The vertical axis is set in a logarithmic scale.

FIG. 6.

(a) Temperature dependence of magnetization obtained by single crystals of CrxEPMANb3S6 in small magnetic field applied perpendicular to the c-axis. Cr intercalation xEPMA in each crystal was determined by electron probe microanalysis (EPMA). The data, normalized by the magnetization at 80 K in each MT curve, are given in an arbitrary unit. (b) The magnetization intensity at 80 K obtained by the MT curves in the CrxEPMANb3S6 crystals. The vertical axis is set in a logarithmic scale.

Close modal

To summarize the experimental results, Fig. 7 shows a correlation between the Cr intercalation xEPMA and magnetic transition temperature Tc in single crystalline CrxEPMANb3S6. Note that most of the present data, denoted by circles and squares, were taken from crystals grown in the same experimental condition with the fixed temperature gradient. The data at x = 0.887(2), 0.915(2), 0.993(2), and 0.995(6) were obtained from crystals in different experimental condition. CSL behavior is observed in a narrow region of xEPMA from 0.98 to 1.03. Tc takes the highest value at 0.98 and 0.99. When xEPMA is larger or smaller than 0.98 ∼ 0.99, Tc is likely to decrease monotonously.

FIG. 7.

Tc vs amount of Cr intercalation xEPMA in single crystals of CrxEPMANb3S6. Red circles and blue squares represent the transition temperatures, determined with the presumption of ferromagnetic (FM) and CSL formation, respectively,, in the present study. The open circles correspond to the data by Dyadkin and Hall, in which the ferromagnetic behavior and composition were reported using single crystal x-ray diffraction and magnetization measurements.32,34

FIG. 7.

Tc vs amount of Cr intercalation xEPMA in single crystals of CrxEPMANb3S6. Red circles and blue squares represent the transition temperatures, determined with the presumption of ferromagnetic (FM) and CSL formation, respectively,, in the present study. The open circles correspond to the data by Dyadkin and Hall, in which the ferromagnetic behavior and composition were reported using single crystal x-ray diffraction and magnetization measurements.32,34

Close modal

In growing single crystals of CrNb3S6, the nominal amount of Cr, xnominal, is one of the most important and controllable parameters. As demonstrated in the present study, the Cr intercalation x of single crystals is smaller than the xnominal in polycrystals used for crystal growth. Resultantly, Cr-defected crystals with x < 1 are synthesized without an optimization of the growth condition. In the present study, we found that the Cr intercalation x of single crystals is proportional to xnominal up to some amount of xnominal (up to x ∼ 1.02 in our experimental condition). Thus, the optimization of xnominal enables us to obtain CrNb3S6 single crystals without defects on the Cr sites.

Note that the magnetic properties are influenced by the Cr intercalation x of single crystals as well. As shown in Fig. 7, the highest Tc of 133 K for chiral helimagnetism is obtained for x = 0.98 and 0.99. A deviation of the x values from the optimum gradually decreases the value of Tc. When x is three or four percent smaller than the optimized x, the single crystals do not show chiral helimagnetism but exhibit ferromagnetism. When increasing the x value, Tc for chiral helimagnetism decreases and ferromagnetism appears in some crystals. This behavior reminds us of a dome-shaped distribution of the Tc of high-Tc oxide superconductors against a carrier doping. The value of Tc is proportional to the strength of J, which stabilizes the coherency of the chiral magnetic order in CrNb3S6.31 In this sense, the amplitude of J and the CSL robustness can be controlled by the Cr intercalation x.

CSL behavior was observed in crystals with excessive intercalation of Cr, by 3%. The magnetic properties in an over-intercalated regime would be worth investigating in terms of the robustness of the CSL formation. In the present experimental condition, the Cr intercalation x was nearly saturated at around 1.02, as shown in Fig. 5. However, the polycrystalline powders in Fig. 4 show a gradual decrease of Tc for the xnominal values from 1.00 to 1.32. Thus, there is a possibility of obtaining single crystals with such over-intercalated Cr ions. We stress that small angle neutron scattering experiments will directly probe the ferromagnetic or chiral helimagnetic structure of such single crystals with a variety of intercalation amounts.

Now we know that the single crystals of CrNb3S6 with smaller values of Tc have a deficient or excessive intercalation of Cr ions. Namely, we can estimate the amount of Cr intercalation x simply by measuring the magnetization. In this respect, magnetization gives us important information for evaluating the quality of the obtained single crystals. To find the growth condition for obtaining high-quality single crystals, the nominal amount of Cr should be optimally parameterized with the fixed experimental condition related to the furnace setting. Similar ideas can be applied for growing single crystals of other kinds of TM3S6 compounds.

As listed in Table I, some studies have discussed the deficiency of ions in CrNb3S6. Mao et al. pointed out the influence of defects of sulfur (S) elements against a drastic reduction of Tc.35 However, as shown in Table I, in their analysis using one particular single crystal that showed ferromagnetic response at 56 K, they obtained x = 0.99(12) within one sigma error (thus x ranges from 0.87 to 1.11). Based on the results in Fig. 7, Tc can be less than 60 K for the crystal with x = 0.87. Thus, such a low Tc can be ascribed to the defects of the Cr ions even within the experimental error bars. To avoid misleading conclusions, systematic examination is required using several crystals with different number of defects of the target elements.

Han et al. reported that their single crystal of CrNb3S6 had the defects of Cr of 12.5%.33 The temperature dependence of magnetization showed ferromagnetic response at 125 K, which is inconsistent with the present results in Fig. 7. Since there was no description on the experimental error of the defect evaluation, the data might be taken at only one location in the crystal. Interestingly, their crystal exhibited an indication of CSL formation with much lower Hc in the magnetic field dependence of the magnetization.

The correlation between the Cr intercalation x and Tc, shown in Fig. 7, is in good agreement with the results obtained by single crystal x-ray diffraction.32,34 Dyadkin et al. reported that a ferromagnetic single crystal of CrxNb3S6 with Tc = 92 K had defects in the Cr sites. For this crystal, the crystal structure analysis gave 0.942 for the x value.32 As shown in Fig. 7, our analysis reveals that crystals with Tc = 92 K have about 0.92 for x, which roughly reproduces the results by Dyadkin et al.

Hall et al. reported x = 1.00(3) for the CrxNb3S6 single crystal with Tc of ∼118 K.34 The crystal structure analysis told that 95.2(2)% of Cr occupied the Wyckoff 2c position, while the remaining Cr occupied the Wyckoff 2b position. Although the total amount of the Cr intercalation took an ideal value, the temperature dependence of magnetization showed ferromagnetism rather than CSL formation. Interestingly, the field dependence of magnetization was not simply regarded to be of ferromagnetic origin, although Hc was eight times smaller than the typical value shown in Fig. 2(a).

Similar examples of single crystals can be found in Fig. 7. The crystals with x = 1.019(3) and 1.033(1) exhibit CSL behavior, while the one with x = 1.020(3) shows a ferromagnetic response. The latter is quite similar to the crystal examined by Hall et al. Even though the crystals mentioned above have almost the same amount of the Cr intercalation x, the ferromagnetic behavior appears in a particular piece of the single crystal, which may be caused by a delicate balance of the locations of the Cr ions in the single crystals. Namely, the deficiency of the Cr ions on the 2c site leads to the additional intercalation on the 2b site. Such disorders on the Cr sites may decrease the amplitude of the DM interaction significantly, which could be monitored by the value of Hc since it is proportional to D2/J. In this connection, it would be interesting to investigate the relationship between the intercalation ratio between 2b and 2c sites and Hc in addition to the evaluation of Tc.

In order to discuss the dome-shaped behavior of Tc in detail, additional experiments will be necessary. Similar behavior is exhibited by other transition metal sulfides, such as ferromagnetic Fe-intercalated tantalum sulfide, and is discussed from the viewpoint of oscillatory characteristics of the Ruderman–Kittel–Kasuya–Yosida (RKKY) interaction.45 The Cr–Cr distance determined by single crystal x-ray diffraction measurements and the carrier concentration by Hall measurements will be helpful in understanding the mechanism behind the dome-shaped behavior. In this Research Update, the ferromagnetic or chiral helimagnetic order is estimated by the existence of the sharp anomaly around Tc. Such magnetic structures can be distinguished by the existence of magnetic satellite peaks in neutron diffraction experiments. Regarding Tc, a precise value can be determined by Arrott plot analysis of the field dependence of magnetization36 as well as by neutron diffraction and heat capacity measurements. In the present study, most crystals grown with x > 1 reveal CSL behavior, while a particular crystal with x = 1.020(3) shows a ferromagnetic response. This exception may be caused by disorders on the Cr sites, the presence of which can be probed by single crystal x-ray diffraction measurements, as observed in ferromagnetic CrNb3Se6.41 

We show how to find the appropriate growth condition of a chiral helimagnet CrxNb3S6 by optimizing the nominal amount of Cr in crystal growth. As shown in Fig. 5, the actual Cr intercalation x in single crystals is smaller than the nominal amount of Cr xnominal of polycrystals used in crystal growth. x dramatically affects the magnetic properties and has a correlation with Tc. Therefore, the amount of Cr intercalation is able to be estimated only by the magnetization measurements. As shown in Fig. 7, the single crystals with x being 0.98 and 0.99 show CSL behavior with the highest Tc of 133 K. Thus, the intercalation-controlled single crystals were successfully obtained using the present approach. Only several percent of defects of the Cr ions prevent the CSL formation and alternatively stabilize the ferromagnetic order probably because of the reduction of the strength of the DM interaction. In this sense, it is very important to check the amount of Cr intercalation x in crystals.

TM3S6 compounds will attract more attention because of studies on the CSL formation made recently in CrTa3S6.42–44 The strategy for the crystal growth demonstrated for CrNb3S6 in the present study can be applied to synthesizing other TM3S6 compounds. The synthesis strategy can be categorized into two cases. The first case is that the compound has a correlation between the amount of T intercalation and Tc, which is the same situation as that for CrNb3S6. Even when the intercalation amount is smaller or larger than the ideal value, the crystal keeps the TM3S6 phase. However, deficient or excessive intercalation affects the physical properties. For example, such a tendency can be found in the Tc distribution as a function of the intercalation amount for CrNb3S6, as shown in Fig. 7. Fortunately, in this case, the growth condition can be optimized by choosing the nominal composition so as to give the highest Tc.

The second case is that the mixture of TM3S6 and TM4S8 is synthesized in the crystal. When the intercalation amount is smaller than the ideal, the deficient amount of T does not decrease Tc, but stabilizes some amount of TM4S8 phase. For example, MnNb3S6 and MnNb4S8 have different Tc at 40 and 100 K,23,30,39 respectively. The magnetization of the MnNb3S6 crystal frequently shows two-step transitions at both temperatures.34 In such cases, the volume fraction between MnNb3S6 and MnNb4S8 can be determined by the temperature dependence of magnetization. Then, the actual amount of Mn ions can be estimated by the volume fraction as well. The remaining task is the optimization of the growth condition so as to eliminate the TM4S8 phase in the crystal.

The next challenge in synthesizing TM3S6 compounds will be the development of the method of enantiopure crystal growth. Non-reciprocal magneto-chiral response and CISS effect are recently observed in CrNb3S6.25,26 These findings shed light on the importance of synthesizing mono-chiral crystals because these phenomena are coupled with the crystallographic chirality of the compounds. However, it is still difficult to stabilize only left- or right-handed chiral crystal structure in synthesizing inorganic chiral materials because it is inevitable to prevent the formation of racemic-twinned crystals, having left- and right-handed crystalline domains within a specimen. Indeed, the CrNb3S6 crystals obtained by the CVT method form the racemic-twinned grains.26 In some inorganic compounds such as NaClO3, TSi, CsCuCl3,and YbNi3Al9, recent progress in growth techniques makes it possible to obtain enantiopure crystals with the desired handedness.46–51 However, such methods are not applicable in the synthesis of TM3S6,and thus a new method will be required to obtain enantiopure crystals. These challenges will be a key factor for observing new physical properties coupled with the handedness of the crystals.

This work was supported by JSPS KAKENHI Grant Nos. 15H05885, 19KK0070, JP19H05822, JP19H05826, and 20H02642.

The authors have no conflicts to disclose.

Y. Kousaka: Data curation (lead); Formal analysis (lead); Funding acquisition (lead); Investigation (lead); Methodology (lead); Visualization (lead); Writing – original draft (lead); Writing – review & editing (lead). T. Ogura: Data curation (equal); Investigation (equal); Methodology (supporting). J. Jiang: Data curation (supporting); Investigation (supporting). K. Mizutani: Data curation (supporting); Investigation (supporting). S. Iwasaki: Data curation (supporting); Investigation (supporting). J. Akimitsu: Data curation (supporting). Y. Togawa: Data curation (supporting); Funding acquisition (supporting); Writing – original draft (supporting); Writing – review & editing (equal).

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

1.
I.
Dzyaloshinsky
,
J. Phys. Chem. Solids
4
,
241
(
1958
).
3.
I. E.
Dzyaloshinskii
,
Sov. Phys. JETP
19
,
960
(
1964
).
4.
I. E.
Dzyaloshinskii
,
Sov. Phys. JETP
19
,
223
(
1965
).
5.
I. E.
Dzyaloshinskii
,
Sov. Phys. JETP
19
,
665
(
1965
).
7.
J.
Kishine
,
K.
Inoue
, and
Y.
Yoshida
,
Prog. Theor. Phys. Suppl.
159
,
82
(
2005
).
8.
A. N.
Bogdanov
and
D. A.
Yablonskii
,
Sov. Phys. JETP
68
,
101
(
1989
).
9.
A.
Bogdanov
and
A.
Hubert
,
J. Magn. Magn. Mater.
138
,
255
(
1994
).
10.
S.
Muhlbauer
,
B.
Binz
,
F.
Jonietz
,
C.
Pfleiderer
,
A.
Rosch
,
A.
Neubauer
,
R.
Georgii
, and
P.
Böni
,
Science
323
,
915
(
2009
).
11.
X. Z.
Yu
,
Y.
Onose
,
N.
Kanazawa
,
J. H.
Park
,
J. H.
Han
,
Y.
Matsui
,
N.
Nagaosa
, and
Y.
Tokura
,
Nature
465
,
901
(
2010
).
12.
Y.
Togawa
,
T.
Koyama
,
K.
Takayanagi
,
S.
Mori
,
Y.
Kousaka
,
J.
Akimitsu
,
S.
Nishihara
,
K.
Inoue
,
A. S.
Ovchinnikov
, and
J.
Kishine
,
Phys. Rev. Lett.
108
,
107202
(
2012
).
13.
Y.
Togawa
,
Y.
Kousaka
,
S.
Nishihara
,
K.
Inoue
,
J.
Akimitsu
,
A. S.
Ovchinnikov
, and
J.
Kishine
,
Phys. Rev. Lett.
111
,
197204
(
2013
).
14.
Y.
Togawa
,
T.
Koyama
,
Y.
Nishimori
,
Y.
Matsumoto
,
S.
McVitie
,
D.
McGrouther
,
R. L.
Stamps
,
Y.
Kousaka
,
J.
Akimitsu
,
S.
Nishihara
,
K.
Inoue
,
I. G.
Bostrem
,
V. E.
Sinitsyn
,
A. S.
Ovchinnikov
, and
J.
Kishine
,
Phys. Rev. B
92
,
220412
(
2015
).
15.
J.
Yonemura
,
Y.
Shimamoto
,
T.
Kida
,
D.
Yoshizawa
,
Y.
Kousaka
,
S.
Nishihara
,
F. J. T.
Goncalves
,
J.
Akimitsu
,
K.
Inoue
,
M.
Hagiwara
, and
Y.
Togawa
,
Phys. Rev. B
96
,
184423
(
2017
).
16.
Y.
Shimamoto
,
Y.
Matsushima
,
T.
Hasegawa
,
Y.
Kousaka
,
I.
Proskurin
,
J.
Kishine
,
A. S.
Ovchinnikov
,
F. J. T.
Goncalves
, and
Y.
Togawa
,
Phys. Rev. Lett.
128
,
247203
(
2022
).
17.
J.
Kishine
and
A. S.
Ovchinnikov
,
Solid State Phys.
66
,
1
(
2015
).
18.
Y.
Togawa
,
Y.
Kousaka
,
K.
Inoue
, and
J.
Kishine
,
J. Phys. Soc. Jpn.
85
,
112001
(
2016
).
19.
J. M.
Van Den Berg
and
P.
Cossee
,
Inorg. Chim. Acta
2
,
143
(
1968
).
20.
K.
Anzenhofer
,
J. M.
Van Den Berg
,
P.
Cossee
, and
J. N.
Helle
,
J. Phys. Chem. Solids
31
,
1057
(
1970
).
21.
F.
Hulliger
and
E.
Pobitschka
,
J. Solid State Chem.
1
,
117
(
1970
).
22.
B.
Van Laar
,
H. M.
Rietveld
, and
D. J. W.
Ijdo
,
J. Solid State Chem.
3
,
154
(
1971
).
23.
S. S. P.
Parkin
and
R. H.
Friend
,
Philos. Mag. B
41
,
65
(
1980
).
24.
S. S. P.
Parkin
and
R. H.
Friend
,
Philos. Mag. B
41
,
95
(
1980
).
25.
R.
Aoki
,
Y.
Kousaka
, and
Y.
Togawa
,
Phys. Rev. Lett.
122
,
057206
(
2019
).
26.
A.
Inui
,
R.
Aoki
,
Y.
Nishiue
,
K.
Shiota
,
Y.
Kousaka
,
H.
Shishido
,
D.
Hirobe
,
M.
Suda
,
J.
Ohe
,
J.
Kishine
,
H. M.
Yamamoto
, and
Y.
Togawa
,
Phys. Rev. Lett.
124
,
166602
(
2020
).
27.
T.
Moriya
and
T.
Miyadai
,
Solid State Commun.
42
,
209
(
1982
).
28.
T.
Miyadai
,
K.
Kikuchi
,
H.
Kondo
,
S.
Sakka
,
M.
Arai
, and
Y.
Ishikawa
,
J. Phys. Soc. Jpn.
52
,
1394
(
1983
).
29.
Y.
Kousaka
,
S.
Yano
,
J.
Kishine
,
Y.
Yoshida
,
K.
Inoue
,
K.
Kikuchi
, and
J.
Akimitsu
,
J. Phys. Soc. Jpn.
76
,
123709
(
2007
).
30.
Y.
Kousaka
,
Y.
Nakao
,
J.
Kishine
,
M.
Akita
,
K.
Inoue
, and
J.
Akimitsu
,
Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. A
600
,
250
(
2009
).
31.
M.
Shinozaki
,
S.
Hoshino
,
Y.
Masaki
,
J.
Kishine
, and
Y.
Kato
,
J. Phys. Soc. Jpn.
85
,
074710
(
2016
).
32.
V.
Dyadkin
,
F.
Mushenok
,
A.
Bosak
,
D.
Menzel
,
S.
Grigoriev
,
P.
Pattison
, and
D.
Chernyshov
,
Phys. Rev. B
91
,
184205
(
2015
).
33.
H.
Han
,
L.
Zhang
,
D.
Sapkota
,
N.
Hao
,
L.
Ling
,
H.
Du
,
L.
Pi
,
C.
Zhang
,
D. G.
Mandrus
, and
Y.
Zhang
,
Phys. Rev. B
96
,
094439
(
2017
).
34.
A. E.
Hall
,
J. C.
Loudon
,
P. A.
Midgley
,
A. C.
Twitchett-Harrison
,
S. J. R.
Holt
,
D. A.
Mayoh
,
J. P.
Tidey
,
Y.
Han
,
M. R.
Lees
, and
G.
Balakrishnan
,
Phys. Rev. Mater.
6
,
024407
(
2022
).
35.
Q.
Mao
,
Y.
Wang
,
R.
Li
,
J.
Qian
,
H.
Wang
,
B.
Chen
,
J.
Ding
,
R.
Khan
,
H.
Hao
, and
J.
Yang
,
Phys. Status Solidi RRL
16
,
2100410
(
2022
).
36.
N. J.
Ghimire
,
M. A.
McGuire
,
D. S.
Parker
,
B.
Sipos
,
S.
Tang
,
J.-Q.
Yan
,
B. C.
Sales
, and
D.
Mandrus
, “
Magnetic phase transitions in single crystals of the chiral helimagnet Cr1/3NbS2
,”
Phys. Rev.
87
,
104403
(
2013
).
37.
E. M.
Clements
,
R.
Das
,
L.
Li
,
P. J.
Lampen-Kelley
,
M.-H.
Phan
,
V.
Keppens
,
D.
Mandrus
, and
H.
Srikanth
,
Sci. Rep.
7
,
6545
(
2017
).
38.
A.
Rahman
,
M. U.
Rehman
,
M.
Kiani
,
H.
Zhao
,
J.
Wang
,
Y.
Lu
,
K.
Ruan
,
R.
Dai
,
Z.
Wang
,
L.
Zhang
,
J.
Wang
, and
Z.
Zhang
,
Phys. Rev. B
105
,
144413
(
2022
).
39.
Y.
Onuki
,
K.
Ina
,
T.
Hirai
, and
T.
Komatsubara
,
J. Phys. Soc. Jpn.
55
,
347
(
1986
).
40.
M.
Eibschütz
,
S.
Mahajan
,
F. J.
DiSalvo
,
G. W.
Hull
, and
J. V.
Waszczak
,
J. Appl. Phys.
52
,
2098
(
1998
).
41.
A. F.
Gubkin
,
E. P.
Proskurina
,
Y.
Kousaka
,
E. M.
Sherokalova
,
N. V.
Selezneva
,
P.
Miao
,
S.
Lee
,
J.
Zhang
,
Y.
Ishikawa
,
S.
Torii
,
T.
Kamiyama
,
J.
Campo
,
J.
Akimitsu
, and
N. V.
Baranov
,
J. Appl. Phys.
119
,
013903
(
2016
).
42.
Y.
Kousaka
,
T.
Ogura
,
J.
Zhang
,
P.
Miao
,
S.
Lee
,
S.
Torii
,
T.
Kamiyama
,
J.
Campo
,
K.
Inoue
, and
J.
Akimitsu
,
J. Phys.: Conf. Ser.
746
,
012061
(
2016
).
43.
C.
Zhang
,
J.
Zhang
,
C.
Liu
,
S.
Zhang
,
Y.
Yuan
,
P.
Li
,
Y.
Wen
,
Z.
Jiang
,
B.
Zhou
,
Y.
Lei
,
D.
Zheng
,
C.
Song
,
Z.
Hou
,
W.
Mi
,
U.
Schwingenschlögl
,
A.
Manchon
,
Z. Q.
Qiu
,
H. N.
Alshareef
,
Y.
Peng
, and
X.-X.
Zhang
,
Adv. Mater.
33
,
2101131
(
2021
).
44.
D.
Obeysekera
,
K.
Gamage
,
Y.
Gao
,
S.-W.
Cheong
, and
J.
Yang
,
Adv. Electron. Mater.
7
,
2100424
(
2021
).
45.
L. S.
Xie
,
S.
Husremović
,
O.
Gonzalez
,
I. M.
Craig
, and
D. K.
Bediako
,
J. Am. Chem. Soc.
144
,
9525
(
2022
).
46.
D. K.
Kondepudi
,
R. J.
Kaufman
, and
N.
Singh
,
Science
250
,
975
(
1990
).
47.
V. A.
Dyadkin
,
S. V.
Grigoriev
,
D.
Menzel
,
E. V.
Moskvin
,
S. V.
Maleyev
, and
H.
Eckerlebe
,
Physica B
406
,
2385
(
2011
).
48.
Y.
Kousaka
,
T.
Koyama
,
M.
Miyagawa
,
K.
Tanaka
,
J.
Akimitsu
, and
K.
Inoue
,
J. Phys.: Conf. Ser.
502
,
012019
(
2014
).
49.
Y.
Kousaka
,
T.
Koyama
,
K.
Ohishi
,
K.
Kakurai
,
V.
Hutanu
,
H.
Ohsumi
,
T.
Arima
,
A.
Tokuda
,
M.
Suzuki
,
N.
Kawamura
,
A.
Nakao
,
T.
Hanashima
,
J.
Suzuki
,
J.
Campo
,
Y.
Miyamoto
,
A.
Sera
,
K.
Inoue
, and
J.
Akimitsu
,
Phys. Rev. Mater.
1
,
071402
(
2017
).
50.
S.
Nakamura
,
J.
Inukai
,
T.
Asaka
,
J.-i.
Yamaura
, and
S.
Ohara
,
J. Phys. Soc. Jpn.
89
,
104005
(
2020
).
51.
Y.
Kousaka
,
S.
Iwasaki
,
T.
Sayo
,
H.
Tanida
,
T.
Matsumura
,
S.
Araki
,
J.
Akimitsu
, and
Y.
Togawa
,
Jpn. J. Appl. Phys.
61
,
045501
(
2022
).