We report on an all-dielectric compound anapole metasurface featuring metaatoms based on concentric disks and rings arranged in a square lattice. In this free-standing metasurface, the radiating multipole components cancel each other out in the far field, regardless of the angle of incidence and the polarization of incoming radiation. To demonstrate experimentally a broadband transparency in the terahertz range, we fabricated a silicon metasurface with a total thickness of 60 μm using electron beam lithography and plasma deep etching techniques. Terahertz time-domain spectroscopy experiments revealed that the transmittance spectra measured at various incident angles and polarization states agree well with the respective modeling data. The proposed compound anapole approach has strong application potential for broadband terahertz photonics and sensing devices.

The electromagnetic response of subwavelength entities can be significantly enhanced by the Mie-type morphology-dependent resonances. Two- or three-dimensional arrays of such entities with a subwavelength period embedded in an appropriate matrix are commonly referred to as metasurfaces and metamaterials. The entities can be viewed as “artificial” atoms (metaatoms), whose electromagnetic properties can be customized by tailoring the subwavelength structural geometrical features.1,2 Exploring a subtle balance of these morphological features and the electromagnetic response of conventional metals, dielectrics, and semiconductors allows one to design metamaterials exhibiting exotic electromagnetic properties not found in nature. These include negative refraction, cloaking, and absolute transparency that open up a plethora of new opportunities for applications ranging from telecommunications to microscopy.1–5 

Design of a metamaterial fully transparent in a wide frequency range is a challenging task, because it implies vanishing radiation scattered by individual metaatoms in the far-field zone even though it may be nonzero in the near-field zone. In terms of multipole expansion of the scattered field,6–9 the reflection will be suppressed if the dipole moment generated in metaatoms by the incident electromagnetic wave is zero. However, in practice, full suppression of the metasurface reflectivity is hardly achievable due to the presence of a substrate that embeds metaatoms. In addition, a finite conductivity of materials used in the fabrication of metasurfaces leads to dissipative losses that also complicate achieving full transparency.10–15 It is worth noting that these losses can be significantly reduced in all-dielectric metaatoms, which are capable of achieving a strong enhancement of the electromagnetic field in a vicinity of the metaatom.16 

In the multipole expansion framework, the electric field of the electromagnetic wave scattered by a metaatom in the far zone can be presented by the following equation:17 
(1)
where r is the distance between the observation point and metaatom, n is the unit vector in the scattering direction, k is the wavenumber, ω is the angular frequency, μ0 is the vacuum permeability, and c is the speed of light in the medium surrounding the metasurface. p, T, m, Q̂e, and Q̂m are the electric dipole, toroidal, magnetic dipole, electric quadrupole, and magnetic quadrupole moments of the metaatom, respectively. These multipole moments are determined by the current density j, which is generated in the metaatom by the incident electromagnetic wave, as follows:
(2)
where integration is taken over the metaatom volume.

One can observe from Eq. (1) that the electric dipole contribution to En can be nullified by the toroidal moment if p=iωc2T. At such a condition, which is referred to as the anapole resonance, electric dipole radiation in the far zone is suppressed, i.e., in the dipole approximation, the metasurface does not reflect the incident electromagnetic wave. By taking into account that |T|jl2 and |p|j/ω, where l is the characteristic size of the metaatom, one can conclude that anapole resonance can be achieved if the size of the metaatom is comparable with the wavelength of the incident wave. This implies that spatial dispersion plays an important role in the electromagnetic response. One may notice that the anapole resonance condition only indirectly (via the current density j) depends on the angle of incidence, i.e., one may expect that it should hold in the wide range of the incidence angles.

It is worth noting, however, that at the anapole resonance, contributions of m, Q̂e, and Q̂m to the En in Eq. (1) may be significant, which prevents the nullifying of the scattered field in the far zone. This issue has been resolved to some extent in the framework of the compound anapole concept.18 Specifically, if the metaatoms are constructed out of several elements with proper size, shape, and mutual arrangement it is possible to simultaneously nullify several multipole moments in Eq. (1) (e.g., p or Q̂e) at a specific frequency. Such a condition is referred to as the compound anapole resonance,18 which can be seen as destructive interference of multipole moments of metaatom's elements. For example, if the metaatom consists of a disk and a ring with an electric dipole moment pdisk and pring, respectively, at the compound anapole resonance pdisk=pring, i.e., the metaatom's dipole moment vanishes, p=pdisk+pring=0, and the dipole contribution to En in Eq. (1) is zero. If the frequencies of the anapole and compound anapole resonances are close enough the broadband transparency can be developed due to suppression of the scattering in the far zone.

In this Letter, we demonstrate that the coexistence of the compound anapole and anapole resonances enables broadband transparency of the metasurface composed of free-standing metaatoms comprising concentric disks and rings (see Fig. 1). To demonstrate this experimentally, we fabricated a metasurface with a unit cell comprising a disk with a radius of 95 μm and a ring with an inner and outer radii of 170 and 250 μm, respectively, (see Fig. 1 metaatom top view). These metaatoms possessing a thickness of about 60 μm were connected by 30 μm wide bridges to arrange them into a square lattice with a period of 630 μm. In the experiment, we measured the transmittance and reflectance spectra of the fabricated metasurface by the terahertz TDS system in the frequency range of 0.2–1.0 THz. The experimental results correspond well with the numerical simulations, which predicted almost 70% transmittance between 500 and 700 GHz frequencies. In this transparency region, the coexisting anapole and compound anapole resonances considerably suppress multipole moments of the metaatoms for a wide range of incident angles and orthogonal polarizations of incident wave.

FIG. 1.

SEM images of the free-standing metasurface (a) and metaatom (b), which comprises co-axial disk and ring with thickness of about 60 μm (c). Inter-metaatom bridges along x and y axes ensure integrity of the metasurface, while intra-metaatom bridges along y axis bound disk and ring. The width of the bridges is 30 μm. Metaatoms are arranged in the square lattice with period of 630 μm. The reflection and transmission spectra of the metasurface were measured for the incident terahertz waves polarized perpendicular (Ex) and parallel (Ey) to the intra-metaatom bridges.

FIG. 1.

SEM images of the free-standing metasurface (a) and metaatom (b), which comprises co-axial disk and ring with thickness of about 60 μm (c). Inter-metaatom bridges along x and y axes ensure integrity of the metasurface, while intra-metaatom bridges along y axis bound disk and ring. The width of the bridges is 30 μm. Metaatoms are arranged in the square lattice with period of 630 μm. The reflection and transmission spectra of the metasurface were measured for the incident terahertz waves polarized perpendicular (Ex) and parallel (Ey) to the intra-metaatom bridges.

Close modal

The metasurface was fabricated out of 100 μm thick double-side polished silicon wafer possessing an electrical p-type resistivity of about 10 Ohm/cm. First, a 100 nm thick Cr layer was sputtered onto the wafer, followed by spin coating with a positive AR-P 6200 resist (Allresist GmbH). The coated wafer was exposed using the Raith EBPG 5000+ ESHR electron beam lithographer and developed. The Cr layer was etched through the obtained resist mask using the Oxford Instruments Plasmalab 100 reactive ion etcher (RIE) with inductively coupled plasma (ICP). After that the silicon was etched to 70 μm depth with Oxford Instruments Plasmalab 80 ICP-RIE, and the sidewalls of created pattern in silicon were protected by sputtering a 100 nm thick Cr layer. Then the wafer was flipped over and the remaining non-patterned layer with a thickness of about 40 μm was etched uniformly in ICP-RIE to develop a pattern of the free-standing metasurface. Finally, by removing the fluorocarbon residues and chromium protective layer with oxygen plasma and wet etching techniques, we reached a 60 μm total thickness of the metaatoms (see Fig. 1).

Transmittance and reflectance spectra of the metasurface were measured with a commercial terahertz TDS system (TeraVil T-SPEC 800) in the frequency range of 0.2–1.0 THz. In transmission geometry, we measured the terahertz pulses transmitted through the air (reference) and the metasurface (sample) using an aperture of 4.0 mm diameter, the size of which is sufficient to irradiate a sufficient number of metaatoms (5 × 5 array) to neglect the boundary effects.19 In reflection geometry, the terahertz pulses reflected from a gold mirror (reference) and the metasurface (sample) were recorded at normal incidence. The amplitudes of the Fourier harmonics were obtained by fast Fourier transform (FFT) of the sample and reference terahertz pulse traces. The squared ratio of these Fourier harmonic amplitudes determined the transmittance and reflectance spectra of the metasurface. More details about measurement setup and data analysis can be found elsewhere.20,21

Figures 2(a) and 2(b) show transmittance and reflectance spectra, respectively, of the fabricated metasurface in the frequency range of 0.4–0.8 THz at normal incidence for the electric field polarized along the x and y axes. The solid lines present the spectra simulated in the COMSOL Multiphysics environment, while the circles show the experimental data. The THz permittivity of the silicon wafers used in our experiment was measured in the spectral range 0.1–3.5 THz in Ref. 22. These data were used for COMSOL Multiphysics modeling.

FIG. 2.

Simulated (solid lines) and measured (circles) transmittance (a) and reflectance (b) spectra of the metasurface in the spectral range of 0.4–0.8 THz for incident wave polarized along the x and y axes (blue red and lines, respectively) at normal incidence. Insets illustrate the orientation of the electric field vector of the incident wave with respect to the intra- and inter-metaatom bridges. One can observe that in the range of 0.5–0.7 THz, the transmission values are close to 70% and show a week dependence on the polarization because in this transparency window coexist two anapole resonances and compound anapole resonance. It is worth noting that outside the gray shaded area the transmission is more sensitive to the polarization of the incident wave.

FIG. 2.

Simulated (solid lines) and measured (circles) transmittance (a) and reflectance (b) spectra of the metasurface in the spectral range of 0.4–0.8 THz for incident wave polarized along the x and y axes (blue red and lines, respectively) at normal incidence. Insets illustrate the orientation of the electric field vector of the incident wave with respect to the intra- and inter-metaatom bridges. One can observe that in the range of 0.5–0.7 THz, the transmission values are close to 70% and show a week dependence on the polarization because in this transparency window coexist two anapole resonances and compound anapole resonance. It is worth noting that outside the gray shaded area the transmission is more sensitive to the polarization of the incident wave.

Close modal

The simulated and measured transmittances [see Fig. 2(a)] are as high as 70% and are almost frequency-independent between 0.5 and 0.7 THz. Since the observed variation of the transmittance in the transparency window does not exceed 30%, the anisotropy induced by intra-metaatom bridges is relatively low. Figure 2(b) shows that in the transparency window, calculated and measured reflectance values do not exceed 20%. The numerical simulation predicts a pronounced dip in the reflectance spectrum for both polarizations at the frequency of 0.55 THz, which, however, was not well reproduced in the experiment.

To gain qualitative understanding of the origin of the transparency window, we evaluate the contributions of individual multipoles to the scattered radiation and consider the frequency dependence of the radiation power scattered by the metaatom. Figure 3 shows power spectra of the radiation scattered by the electric and magnetic dipoles, electric and magnetic quadrupoles, and toroidal moment, which are introduced in Eq. (1). Since toroidal and electric dipole moments produce identical radiation patterns in the far zone, we also calculated power generated by the combined source TED=p+iωc2T. It is worth noting that interference between p and T may either be constructive or destructive. The latter corresponds to the anapole resonance, which manifests itself as a dip in the TED emission spectrum. One can observe from Figs. 3(a) and 3(b) that there exist two anapole resonances situated at the frequencies of 0.52 and 0.625 THz, where a suppression of the scattering and, correspondingly, an increase in the transmittance is expected. In addition, in the frequency range of 0.54–0.56 THz, the powers produced by all multipole moments but magnetic dipole are minima, i.e., this frequency range corresponds to the compound anapole resonance. The coexistence of two anapole resonances and a compound anapole resonance in a relatively narrow spectrum region essentially suppresses the scattering of the metaatoms that results in the transparency window spanning from 0.5 to 0.7 THz. Figures 3(a) and 3(b) show that the magnetic dipole dominates in scattering in this frequency range. Our numerical simulation showed that silicon conductivity is responsible for about 30% reduction of the transmittance within the transparency window.

FIG. 3.

Radiation power spectra of electric dipole moment p (blue), toroidal dipole moment T (orange), magnetic dipole moment m (violet), electric quadrupole Qê (cyan), magnetic quadrupole moment Qm̂ (yellow), and combined electric/toroidal moment TED=p+ikcT (green). Dips in the TED spectra at 0.52 and 0.625 THz represent the electric anapole resonances, while the compound anapole resonance is situated in the frequency range 0.54–0.56 THz where all multipole moments but magnetic dipole are strongly suppressed.

FIG. 3.

Radiation power spectra of electric dipole moment p (blue), toroidal dipole moment T (orange), magnetic dipole moment m (violet), electric quadrupole Qê (cyan), magnetic quadrupole moment Qm̂ (yellow), and combined electric/toroidal moment TED=p+ikcT (green). Dips in the TED spectra at 0.52 and 0.625 THz represent the electric anapole resonances, while the compound anapole resonance is situated in the frequency range 0.54–0.56 THz where all multipole moments but magnetic dipole are strongly suppressed.

Close modal

Although the intra-metaatom bridges do not influence the primary multipoles or the overall response of the metamaterial, they introduce asymmetry affecting higher-order multipoles in the metamaterial response. Specifically, the contribution of the magnetic quadrupole moment to the emission in Fig. 3(a) becomes comparable with that of magnetic dipole moment. We believe that this is manifestation of so-called trapped23,24 magnetic quadrupole mode, which emerges at the incident wave polarized perpendicular to the interatom bridge [Ex in Fig. 3(a)]. When the polarization of the incident wave rotates by 90°, this mode experiences leakage because the magnetic field penetrates the intra-metaatom bridges. However, when the structure is irradiated with the y-polarized wave, the magnetic field penetrates intra-metaatom bridges and this trapped mode experiences leakage leading to an increase in the magnetic quadrupole emission.

To study the effect of the anapole and compound resonances on the reflectance further, we compared the reflectance spectra of a gold mirror with and without our metasurface. Results are shown in Fig. 4(a). One can see that placing the metasurface on top of the gold mirror leaves reflectance in the transparency window virtually unchanged for x- and y-polarized incident light, i.e., the presence of the metasurface is hardly noticeable. On the contrary, outside the transparency window, the metasurface strongly suppresses the terahertz wave reflected from the mirror. Figure 4(b) demonstrates that the reflectance spectrum of empty aperture remained order of magnitude below than that of metasurface in all experiments.

FIG. 4.

(a) Terahertz reflectance spectra at normal incidence of the metasurface combined with the gold mirror for the EY- (red line) and EX-(blue line) polarized light and the bare gold mirror after aperture (gold line). The results are presented in a linear scale. (b) THz reflectance spectra of a bare metasurface at normal incidence for the EY- (red line) and EX-(blue line) polarized THz radiation. The black line shows the reflectance of the empty aperture used in experiments. Insets illustrate experimental arrangements.

FIG. 4.

(a) Terahertz reflectance spectra at normal incidence of the metasurface combined with the gold mirror for the EY- (red line) and EX-(blue line) polarized light and the bare gold mirror after aperture (gold line). The results are presented in a linear scale. (b) THz reflectance spectra of a bare metasurface at normal incidence for the EY- (red line) and EX-(blue line) polarized THz radiation. The black line shows the reflectance of the empty aperture used in experiments. Insets illustrate experimental arrangements.

Close modal

Finally, we investigated the dependence of the terahertz transmittance on the angle of incidence for different polarizations of the incident wave. The results are shown in Fig. 5. One can observe that within the transparency window of 0.5–0.7 THz the transmittance shows a pronounced frequency dependence at oblique incidence and may become as low as 10% when the metasurface is rotated by 45° for both polarizations of the incident wave. The obtained weak dependence of the transmittance on the angle of incidence in the red part of the transparency window may indicate that anapole resonance at 0.52 THz dominates the metasurface response. However, in the vicinity of the compound anapole resonance at 0.55 THz and anapole resonance at 0.625 THz we observe pronounced transmission dependences on the incident angle. This may be caused by the mutual coupling effects between inter-metaatom bridge, disk, and ring at these frequencies that require further investigation.19 It is worth noting that altering the angle of incidence and/or polarization of the incoming light may drastically change the electromagnetic field in the near zone; however, this hardly affects the suppression of the field in the far zone at the anapole resonance.

FIG. 5.

The transmittance spectra measured when the metasurface was rotated around the x axis (a) and (c) and y axis (b) and (d) for the incident wave polarized along (a) and (d) and perpendicular (b) and (c) to intra-metaatom bridges.

FIG. 5.

The transmittance spectra measured when the metasurface was rotated around the x axis (a) and (c) and y axis (b) and (d) for the incident wave polarized along (a) and (d) and perpendicular (b) and (c) to intra-metaatom bridges.

Close modal

In conclusion, we developed the compound anapole metasurface consisting of concentric disks and rings arranged in a square lattice. The proposed design allowed us to achieve the compound anapole regime, in which the scattered radiation in the far field is drastically suppressed and provides enhanced transparency in the range of 0.5–0.7 THz independently of the angle of incidence and of the polarization of incident light. The results of the terahertz time-domain spectroscopy measurements correspond well to the predictions of the first-principle numerical simulations in the COMSOL environment. The compound anapole metasurface has significant potential for suppressing background noise and improving the resolution in the terahertz imaging systems or designing low-loss filters and antennas.

This work was supported by the Research Council of Finland via Flagship Programme Photonics Research and Innovation decision #320166 (PREIN), grant decision #343393 (TETRAMETER), and the Horizon 2020 RISE projects #101007896 (CHARTIST) and #823878 (TERASSE). The Vilnius group was supported by the EU H2020 programme ITN-MCS project TERAOPTICS under the grant agreement No. 956857 and EU Next Generation Grant under Measure No. #10-038-T-0010.

The authors have no conflicts to disclose.

Surya Revanth Ayyagari and Daniil Pashnev contributed equally to this work.

Isaac Appiah Otoo: Data curation (equal); Formal analysis (equal); Investigation (equal); Methodology (equal); Writing – original draft (equal). Alexey Basharin: Conceptualization (equal); Methodology (equal); Validation (equal); Writing – original draft (equal). Grigorii Matveev: Data curation (equal); Formal analysis (equal). Georgy Fedorov: Investigation (equal); Methodology (equal); Validation (equal); Writing – original draft (equal); Writing – review & editing (equal). Petri Karvinen: Investigation (equal); Methodology (equal); Validation (equal). Surya Revanth Ayyagari: Data curation (equal); Formal analysis (equal); Investigation (equal); Visualization (equal); Writing – original draft (equal). Daniil Pashnev: Data curation (equal); Formal analysis (equal); Investigation (equal); Methodology (equal); Validation (equal); Visualization (equal); Writing – review & editing (equal). Andrzej Urbanowicz: Data curation (equal); Formal analysis (equal); Investigation (equal); Methodology (equal). Justinas Jorudas: Data curation (equal); Formal analysis (equal); Investigation (equal); Methodology (equal); Validation (equal); Writing – review & editing (equal). Irmantas Kasalynas: Investigation (equal); Methodology (equal); Supervision (equal); Validation (equal); Visualization (equal); Writing – original draft (equal); Writing – review & editing (equal). Yuri Svirko: Conceptualization (equal); Formal analysis (equal); Investigation (equal); Supervision (equal); Writing – original draft (equal); Writing – review & editing (equal). Polina Kuzhir: Conceptualization (equal); Funding acquisition (equal); Investigation (equal); Supervision (equal); Writing – original draft (equal); Writing – review & editing (equal).

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding authors upon reasonable request.

1.
N. I.
Zheludev
, “
The road ahead for metamaterials
,”
Science
328
,
582
583
(
2010
).
2.
C. M.
Soukoulis
and
M.
Wegener
, “
Optical metamaterials—more bulky and less lossy
,”
Science
330
,
1633
1634
(
2010
).
3.
C. M.
Soukoulis
and
M.
Wegener
, “
Past achievements and future challenges in the development of three-dimensional photonic metamaterials
,”
Nat. Photonics
5
,
523
530
(
2011
).
4.
A.
Boltasseva
and
H. A.
Atwater
, “
Low-loss plasmonic metamaterials
,”
Science
331
,
290
291
(
2011
).
5.
Y.
Liu
and
X.
Zhang
, “
Metamaterials: A new frontier of science and technology
,”
Chem. Soc. Rev.
40
,
2494
2507
(
2011
).
6.
N. A.
Nemkov
,
A. A.
Basharin
, and
V. A.
Fedotov
, “
Electromagnetic sources beyond common multipoles
,”
Phys. Rev. A
98
,
023858
(
2018
).
7.
P.
Grahn
,
A.
Shevchenko
, and
M.
Kaivola
, “
Electromagnetic multipole theory for optical nanomaterials
,”
New J. Phys.
14
,
093033
(
2012
).
8.
A.
Ospanova
,
M.
Cojocari
, and
A.
Basharin
, “
Modified multipoles in photonics
,”
Phys. Rev. B
107
,
035156
(
2023
).
9.
R. E.
Raab
and
O. L.
De Lange
,
Multipole Theory in Electromagnetism: Classical, Quantum, and Symmetry Aspects, with Applications
(
OUP Oxford
,
2004
), Vol.
128
.
10.
S. I.
Lepeshov
,
A. E.
Krasnok
,
P. A.
Belov
, and
A. E.
Miroshnichenko
, “
Hybrid nanophotonics
,”
Phys. Usp.
61
,
1035
(
2019
).
11.
A. B.
Evlyukhin
,
S. M.
Novikov
,
U.
Zywietz
,
R. L.
Eriksen
,
C.
Reinhardt
,
S. I.
Bozhevolnyi
, and
B. N.
Chichkov
, “
Demonstration of magnetic dipole resonances of dielectric nanospheres in the visible region
,”
Nano Lett.
12
,
3749
3755
(
2012
).
12.
J.-M.
Geffrin
,
B.
García-Cámara
,
R.
Gómez-Medina
,
P.
Albella
,
L.
Froufe-Pérez
,
C.
Eyraud
,
A.
Litman
,
R.
Vaillon
,
F.
González
,
M.
Nieto-Vesperinas
et al, “
Magnetic and electric coherence in forward-and back-scattered electromagnetic waves by a single dielectric subwavelength sphere
,”
Nat. Commun.
3
,
1171
(
2012
).
13.
Y. H.
Fu
,
A. I.
Kuznetsov
,
A. E.
Miroshnichenko
,
Y. F.
Yu
, and
B.
Luk'yanchuk
, “
Directional visible light scattering by silicon nanoparticles
,”
Nat. Commun.
4
,
1527
(
2013
).
14.
S.
Person
,
M.
Jain
,
Z.
Lapin
,
J. J.
Sáenz
,
G.
Wicks
, and
L.
Novotny
, “
Demonstration of zero optical backscattering from single nanoparticles
,”
Nano Lett.
13
,
1806
1809
(
2013
).
15.
I.
Staude
,
A. E.
Miroshnichenko
,
M.
Decker
,
N. T.
Fofang
,
S.
Liu
,
E.
Gonzales
,
J.
Dominguez
,
T. S.
Luk
,
D. N.
Neshev
,
I.
Brener
et al, “
Tailoring directional scattering through magnetic and electric resonances in subwavelength silicon nanodisks
,”
ACS Nano
7
,
7824
7832
(
2013
).
16.
A. I.
Kuznetsov
,
A. E.
Miroshnichenko
,
M. L.
Brongersma
,
Y. S.
Kivshar
, and
B.
Luk'yanchuk
, “
Optically resonant dielectric nanostructures
,”
Science
354
,
aag2472
(
2016
).
17.
N.
Papasimakis
,
V.
Fedotov
,
V.
Savinov
,
T.
Raybould
, and
N.
Zheludev
, “
Electromagnetic toroidal excitations in matter and free space
,”
Nat. Mater.
15
,
263
271
(
2016
).
18.
A. A.
Basharin
,
E.
Zanganeh
,
A. K.
Ospanova
,
P.
Kapitanova
, and
A. B.
Evlyukhin
, “
Selective superinvisibility effect via compound anapole
,”
Phys. Rev. B
107
,
155104
(
2023
).
19.
A.
Surya Revanth
,
S.
Indrišiūnas
,
A.
Basharin
et al, “
Experimental observation of mutual coupling in resonator array on thin-metal-film
,”
J. Appl. Phys.
(to be published).
20.
P. U.
Jepsen
,
D. G.
Cooke
, and
M.
Koch
, “
Terahertz spectroscopy and imaging–Modern techniques and applications
,”
Laser Photonics Rev.
5
,
124
166
(
2011
).
21.
D.
Pashnev
,
V. V.
Korotyeyev
,
J.
Jorudas
,
A.
Urbanowicz
,
P.
Prystawko
,
V.
Janonis
, and
I.
Kašalynas
, “
Investigation of electron effective mass in AlGaN/GaN heterostructures by THz spectroscopy of drude conductivity
,”
IEEE Trans. Electron Devices
69
,
3636
3640
(
2022
).
22.
M.
Cojocari
,
A.
Ospanova
,
V.
Chichkov
,
M.
Navarro-Cía
,
A.
Gorodetsky
, and
A.
Basharin
, “
Pseudo-anapole regime in terahertz metasurfaces
,”
Phys. Rev. B
104
,
075408
(
2021
).
23.
V. A.
Fedotov
,
M.
Rose
,
S. L.
Prosvirnin
,
N.
Papasimakis
, and
N. I.
Zheludev
, “
Sharp trapped-mode resonances in planar metamaterials with a broken structural symmetry
,”
Phys. Rev. Lett.
99
,
147401
(
2007
).
24.
K.
Koshelev
,
S.
Lepeshov
,
M.
Liu
,
A.
Bogdanov
, and
Y.
Kivshar
, “
Asymmetric metasurfaces with high-Q resonances governed by bound states in the continuum
,”
Phys. Rev. Lett.
121
,
193903
(
2018
).