Due to the outstanding mechanical properties of gyroid structures, the design of cellular structures based on gyroid lattices and topology optimization is currently a prominent research area in the field of additive manufacturing structural design. Stiffness topology optimization is commonly used in these designs, which improves the stability during specific loadings and the continuity of structures. However, there seems to be little discussion on manufacturing deformable cellular structures based on topology optimization for deformation. This topic has significant value in functionally graded material and programmable soft robotics design. In this work, a hyperelastic material is utilized to construct deformable gyroid lattices. The homogenization method is used to establish a database of variable-stiffness gyroid lattices with varying relative densities. The feasibility of guiding structural deformation through stiffness distribution is proved, and a pixel design method for deformable structures is proposed. In this work, the average normalized stiffness coefficient (ANSC) distribution is calculated by pixelating stiffness distribution. The soft gyroid lattices are used to fill up the design domain according to the ANSC distribution. Finally, two deformable structures, a cloaking metamaterial, and a compliant plier are analyzed to demonstrate the practicality of the proposed method.

Triply periodic minimal surface (TPMS) is a class of periodic surface structure in three principal directions, which is infinite and non-self-intersecting. In the mathematical description, the mean curvature of TPMS is always zero, which means that the sum of the principal curvatures of each point on TPMS is zero. In addition, any sufficiently small patch taken from the TPMS has the smallest area among all patches manufactured within the same boundaries.1–3 The first examples of TPMSs were presented by Schwarz in 1865,4 followed by his student Neovius in 1883.5 They described five types of TPMS. These structures were named as Schwarz primitive (P), Schwarz diamond (D), Schwarz hexagonal (H), Schwarz crossed layers of parallels, and Neovius (N). Then, gyroid (G) surface and more kinds of TPMSs were presented by Schoen in 1970.6 A series of research focused on the special performances and properties of some disciplines, such as mechanics,7–9 optics,10,11 thermology,12,13 and chemistry.14,15 Compared to other structures, the surfaces of TPMS are very smooth, which has no sharp edges or junctions as the conventional lattice structures.16,17 Among TPMSs, gyroid is the most famous one, and several experimental and numerical studies investigated the mechanical properties of gyroid structures.18–23 A better performance on energy absorption and compressive strength is demonstrated, indicating that gyroid structures hold promise as a multi-functional structure for a wide range of applications.24–27 In addition, the development of additive manufacturing (AM) technology improves the application value and reduces the difficulties of fabricating TPMSs. Most of the current TPMS structures are fabricated by AM methods.28–31 

These studies mainly focus on the impact of periodic arrangement. The method for structure optimization is rarely mentioned in them. Other researchers focused on the optimizing methods based on the cellular structures of TPMSs. Topology optimization is one of the hotspots in current research works.32–44 These proposed methods focus on the stiffness adjustment and optimization of structures composed of TPMSs, which enhance the stability of structures under specific loadings. The deformation of the structure in these cases is not the emphasis of this research. However, studying the relationship between stiffness distribution and deformation, and further, using special stiffness distribution to guide deformation and achieve expected deformation effect has significant value in research and application, such as functionally graded material41 and programmable soft robotics.42 In general, large deformations may lead to structural failure of plastic materials. It is necessary to use hyperelastic materials43,44 to prevent structural damage during loading. These aspects of research are rarely mentioned in studies about TPMSs.

In this work, we focus on the relationship between stiffness distribution and deformation in structures. Design method on controllable deformation of deformable structures is also discussed. The gyroid lattices with different relative densities are carried out, and a database containing lattices with variable stiffness is established. The hyperelastic UV-cured material is used to manufacture the soft gyroid lattices. Variable permutations of the gyroid lattices are generated, and their deformation characteristics under compression are analyzed to prove that different lattice combinations can lead to different deformation modes of the structures. According to the previous discussions, a pixel design method for deformable structures based on soft gyroid lattices and topology optimization is proposed. This method can be used to design functionally graded or programmable deformable structures.

When a surface has a mean curvature of zero at any point, it is referred to as a minimal surface. The minimal surface can be described by the level-set approximation approach. Level-set equations are a set of trigonometric functions that satisfies the equality φ(x, y, z) = c. Here, the function φ(x, y, z) is an iso-surface evaluated at an iso-value c. Among the minimal surfaces, the level-set equation for gyroid surfaces, which we mainly discussed in this work, is shown as follows:
sin X cos Y + sin Y cos Z + sin Z cos X = c .
(1)

In this equation, X = 2απx, Y = 2βπy, Z = 2πγz, α, β, and γ are constants related to the unit cell size in the x, y, and z directions, respectively. When this surface is infinite and periodic in 3D, it is referred to as a TPMS. As shown in Fig. 1(a), examples of TPMS lattices built-in solid-networks are provided. These lattices, which we used in this article, are all generated in MSLattice.45 The solid-network TPMS lattices can be created based on the zero-thickness minimal surfaces. The volumes are divided by the minimal surface as the solid domain and the other as the void domain. This is done by considering the volume bounded by the minimal surface such that φ(x, y, z) > c or φ (x, y, z) < c to create a solid-network lattice.

FIG. 1.

Gyroid lattice and analysis for it using homogenization method: (a) the gyroid lattices with other TPMS, (b) gyroid lattices with different relative density φ, (c) the loading and boundary conditions used in compress test, and (d) the correlation between E and φ.

FIG. 1.

Gyroid lattice and analysis for it using homogenization method: (a) the gyroid lattices with other TPMS, (b) gyroid lattices with different relative density φ, (c) the loading and boundary conditions used in compress test, and (d) the correlation between E and φ.

Close modal
Relative density refers to the density of the resulting lattice divided by the density of the base material it is made of. Relative density is also equivalent to the solid volume fraction, which represents the solid volume of the lattice in relation to the volume of the space it occupies. The relative density of solid-network lattices derived from TPMS can be graded by varying the value of the level-set constant c in the Cartesian space, depending on a certain function or tabulated data,
φ > c x , y , z o r φ < c x , y , z .
(2)

Then, the lattices with the relative density φ of 20%, 40%, 60%, and 80% can be obtained as shown in Fig. 1(b). To analyze the mechanical properties of these gyroid lattices, the homogenization method is used through experimental compression test.

The loading and boundary conditions of the test are set as shown in Fig. 1(c). According to the homogenization method, the normalized unit elastic modulus E can be obtained by the following equation:
E = F V × E m ,
(3)
where F represents the total load force. V represents the vertical displacement of the top boundary of the lattice. E m is the elastic modulus of a completely solid lattice. The correlation between E and φ is achieved as shown in Fig. 1(d). As φ increases, E increases gradually and an obvious gradient is formed between two lattices generated with different φ.

According to the stiffness gradient controlled by the relative density of the gyroid lattice, the specific stiffness distribution of a structure can be obtained by adjusting the composition of the gyroid lattices, which are filled in the structure. Then, the stiffness distribution is able to affect the conduction of stress in the structure during compression process. Macroscopically, a specific deformation mode is generated on the whole structure. To validate the predictions, we use four gyroid lattices with a size of 10 × 10 × 10 mm3 to construct a square structure measuring 20 × 20 × 10 mm3. The compositions of the lattices are shown in Fig. 2(a). The different composition modes, uniform composition (UC) and random composition (RC), are manufactured in STL. file format. In order to predict the deformation behavior, the finite element analysis (FEA) was carried out using Abaqus dynamic explicit code (Dassault Systemes, France), as shown in Fig. 2(b). The models are meshed using improved ten-node tetrahedron elements (C3D10M), and two rigid faces are set above and below the model, which is simulated to be compressed. The two faces are meshed with rigid elements (R3D4). The mesh details of the composition models are shown in Table I. One of the faces is set to fixed constraints, and the other face is set to displace in the y direction. The material is set using the five-constant Mooney–Rivlin model for hyperelasticity. The values of the constants for the model are shown in Table II. In addition, the standard quasi-static uniaxial compression test is carried out to verify the accuracy of simulation. The setup of the test is shown in Fig. 2(c).

FIG. 2.

The uniaxial compression simulation test for the composition models. (a) The two kinds of composition models formed by the gyroid lattice, uniform composition (UC), and random composition (RC). (b) The boundary conditions and load for simulation in Abaqus. (c) Experimental setup for the standard quasi-static uniaxial compression test. (d) The compression FEA simulation and the compression test for the UC model and (e) the RC model.

FIG. 2.

The uniaxial compression simulation test for the composition models. (a) The two kinds of composition models formed by the gyroid lattice, uniform composition (UC), and random composition (RC). (b) The boundary conditions and load for simulation in Abaqus. (c) Experimental setup for the standard quasi-static uniaxial compression test. (d) The compression FEA simulation and the compression test for the UC model and (e) the RC model.

Close modal
TABLE I.

The mesh details of the composition models.

UC RC
Element type  C3D10M  C3D10M 
Element number  1 054 276  510 759 
Minimum size element  0.009  0.011 
Maximum size element  0.624  0.946 
UC RC
Element type  C3D10M  C3D10M 
Element number  1 054 276  510 759 
Minimum size element  0.009  0.011 
Maximum size element  0.624  0.946 
TABLE II.

The values of the five constants for constitutive model.

C 10 C 01 C 11 C 20 C 02
−0.98 MPa  2.08 MPa  −0.13 MPa  0.04 MPa  0.54 MPa 
C 10 C 01 C 11 C 20 C 02
−0.98 MPa  2.08 MPa  −0.13 MPa  0.04 MPa  0.54 MPa 

The results of the FEA (finite element analysis) simulation and the compression tests are shown in Figs. 2(d) and 2(e). It can be observed that similar deformations of the models occurred in simulation and experiments. Due to the uniform distribution of the material in the UC model, the deformation of the model is symmetrical during compression. While the stiffness distribution is inhomogeneous like the RC model, the deformation is asymmetric. As V0 increases from 2 to 6 mm, the model is compressed in the vertical direction. Meanwhile, a tilt to the right has occurred on the model. According to these results, the impact on the stiffness distribution of the whole structure is relatively obvious by adjusting the composition of the gyroid lattices, which can macroscopically alter the deformation of the structure.

According to the results of our previous study,46 the average normalized stiffness coefficient (ANSC) distribution in the design domain Ω can be obtained by pixelating the result of the material volume factor θ distribution obtained by topology optimization. This process is achieved by calculating the mean value of θ within each pixel block. The variable-stiffness gyroid lattices with a hyperelastic material are used to fill the structure based on the ANSC distribution.

The flow chart of the proposed method is shown in Fig. 3. The gyroid lattice and its mechanical properties have been discussed. The lattice database is established based on the gyroid lattice with varying relative density. In addition, the experimental results prove that using lattice arrangement to guide the deformation of the deformable structure manufactured by a soft material is feasible. Then, we focus on the topology optimization related to deformable structures and their performance on local and global deformations. According to the ANSC distribution, the gyroid lattices can be filled into the design domain and the remapped deformable structure can be obtained. To validate this prediction, topology optimization is performed on various continuous structures for specific objectives and applications.

FIG. 3.

The method for manufacturing a continuous deformable structure filled with the gyroid lattices based on topology optimization.

FIG. 3.

The method for manufacturing a continuous deformable structure filled with the gyroid lattices based on topology optimization.

Close modal
Cloaking is one of the important applications of mechanical metamaterials. Objects within a homogeneous surrounding could be concealed by using cloaking materials, which prevent the detection of the objects by external mechanical fields. The cloaking structure can be designed using the proposed method as shown in Fig. 4(a). A rigid domain is set on the top side of the design domain, and a vertical force is applied to the rigid domain. The objective of optimization is to minimize the average displacement in the objective domain Ω s under vertical loading. Then, the loading will almost not be transmitted to the object under Ω s. This optimization task could be described as the general formulation,
min : Φ = Ω s δ d Ω , s . t . F = K U ,
(4)
where Φ is the objective function to achieve minimum value of displacement δ in Ω s. F is the nodal load vector, and K is the global stiffness matrix, given by
K = V Ω B T D B d V ,
(5)
where B is the strain (geometric) matrix consisting of the derivative of a shape function, and D is the elasticity matrix.
FIG. 4.

The design and test process of a cloaking structure based on topology optimization and gyroid lattices: (a) the process of designing the cloaking structure, (b) the setups of the compression experiments, (c) the structure of the sensor for deformation detection, (d) the relationship between loading force and the deformation of the strain gauge during loading, and (e) and (f) the value of the voltage output by the strain sensor module when the loading force is about 100, 120, 140 N without and with cloaking design.

FIG. 4.

The design and test process of a cloaking structure based on topology optimization and gyroid lattices: (a) the process of designing the cloaking structure, (b) the setups of the compression experiments, (c) the structure of the sensor for deformation detection, (d) the relationship between loading force and the deformation of the strain gauge during loading, and (e) and (f) the value of the voltage output by the strain sensor module when the loading force is about 100, 120, 140 N without and with cloaking design.

Close modal

The uniaxial compression tests are performed on the specimens of the cloaking structure filled with the gyroid lattices base on topology optimization (with cloaking) and the structure filled with the same relative density (φ = 60%) lattices (no cloaking), respectively. The setup of the tests is designed as shown in Fig. 4(b). The loading force is applied on the specimens gradually. A home-made deformation detection sensor is used to measure the deformation degree of the specimens. The sensor is composed of a bending beam, a strain gauge, and a signal convertor, as shown in Fig. 4(c). The strain gauge is pasted on the lower surface of the bending beam. Under compression, the lower surface of the bending beam and the strain gauge will bend downward, which makes the resistance of strain gauge change. Furthermore, the signal convertor transforms the value of the resistor to voltage signal directly. The voltmeter is used to detect the variation of the voltage signal. The voltage measured increases with deformation of the specimens. The experimental results are shown in Figs. 4(d)–4(f). It can be seen that while the loading force reaches 62.8 N, the deformation of the structure without cloaking design measured by the sensor begins to increase rapidly. While the cloaking structure is under the same loading, the strain is almost unchanged, and after the loading force reaches 93.7 N, the measured deformation begins to increase. Compared with the no cloaking structure, the deformation of the objective domain in the structure with cloaking design increases more slowly when the loading force becomes larger. This phenomenon proves the performance of the cloaking design with the proposed method.

In order to test the feasibility of designing a programmable deformation in a deformable structure, a compliant plier design is also carried out using the proposed method. The design domain and boundary condition setups are shown in Fig. 5(a). Because of the symmetry of the plier structure, only half of the complete model needs to be used for topology optimization. This optimization task aims to maximize the vertical displacement of the jaw v b, which could be described as follows:
max : v b s . t . F = K U .
(6)
After solving and iterating the optimization task using FEM, the results of the topology optimization are obtained as shown in Fig. 5(b). Then, ANSC distribution in Ω can be obtained as shown in Fig. 5(c). The lattice structure of a half plier is shown in Fig. 5(d). To ensure lateral stability of the structure, there are three rows of lattices in the lateral direction.
FIG. 5.

The process of designing a compliant plier with symmetrical structure based on topology optimization and gyroid lattices: (a) the setup for topology optimization, (b) the result of material volume factor distribution obtained by optimization, (c) the ANSC distribution, and (d) the continuous lattice structure for the compliant plier.

FIG. 5.

The process of designing a compliant plier with symmetrical structure based on topology optimization and gyroid lattices: (a) the setup for topology optimization, (b) the result of material volume factor distribution obtained by optimization, (c) the ANSC distribution, and (d) the continuous lattice structure for the compliant plier.

Close modal

The complete compliant plier is manufactured by 3D printing as shown in Fig. 6(a). A compression test is conducted on the obtained plier to assess its deformation performance. The setup of the test is shown in Fig. 6(b). The force F is gradually applied to the handle of the plier, and the distance of jaw X is measured by the calipers. The test results are shown in Fig. 6(c). The value of X decreases by 20% under a loading of 34.7 N. This plier can be used to grip objects with diameters smaller than the jaw. The pen, glue bottle, and paint tube are gripped up as shown in Fig. 6(d).

FIG. 6.

The compression experiment and gripping tests for the compliant plier: (a) the compliant plier manufactured by SLA, (b) setup and measurement in the compression experiment, (c) the results of X and F during compression, and (d) in the gripping tests, pen, glue bottle, and paint tube were used as the objects for gripping.

FIG. 6.

The compression experiment and gripping tests for the compliant plier: (a) the compliant plier manufactured by SLA, (b) setup and measurement in the compression experiment, (c) the results of X and F during compression, and (d) in the gripping tests, pen, glue bottle, and paint tube were used as the objects for gripping.

Close modal

In conclusion, a design method for controllable deformation and functional grading of deformable structures is focused on. The homogenization method is used by a compressing test, and an obvious gradient of the stiffness is formed between two lattices generated with different relative densities. A database that contains soft gyroid lattices with variable stiffness is established. Variable permutations of the gyroid lattices are fabricated with the hyperelastic material. Their elastic characteristics under compression are investigated and validated through FEA simulation and experiments. The experimental and simulation results are anastomotic and prove that different lattice combinations can lead to different deformation modes of the structures. Based on the discussions herein, a pixel design method for deformable structures based on soft gyroid lattices and topology optimization related to deformation is proposed. Two applications, a cloaking metamaterial, and a compliant plier are designed by the proposed method and tested. According to the results, deformation of the measured point on the cloaking structure decrease by 93.1%, 84.6%, and 81.2% under loading forces of 100, 120 and 140 N compared to the structure without a cloaking design. In addition, the weight of the structure is reduced by 13.2% due to the design. For the designed compliant plier, the distance of the jaw decreases by 20% under a loading of 34.7 N, which is useful to grip objects smaller than the jaw. These results demonstrate the practicality and feasibility of the proposed method.

This work was supported in part by the National Natural Science Foundation of China under Grant Nos. 52275009 and 52207038, in part by Postgraduate Research & Practice Innovation Program of Jiangsu Province under Grant No. SJCX23_0062.

The authors have no conflicts to disclose.

Wenhai Zhang: Data curation (lead); Formal analysis (equal); Investigation (lead); Methodology (equal); Writing – original draft (lead). Youkang Hu: Conceptualization (equal); Formal analysis (lead); Investigation (equal); Writing – original draft (supporting). Ling Qin: Formal analysis (equal); Investigation (supporting); Writing – review & editing (lead). Jiyao Wang: Conceptualization (supporting); Project administration (supporting); Validation (lead); Writing – review & editing (equal). Wei Xu: Conceptualization (lead); Funding acquisition (lead); Investigation (equal); Methodology (lead); Writing – review & editing (equal).

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

1.
S.
Hyde
,
Z.
Blum
,
T.
Landh
et al,
The Language of Shape: The Role of Curvature in Condensed Matter: Physics, Chemistry and Biology
(
Elsevier Science B.V
.,
Amsterdam, The Netherlands
,
1996
).
2.
I.
Maskery
,
N. T.
Aboulkhair
,
A. O.
Aremu
et al, “
Compressive failure modes and energy absorption in additively manufactured double gyroid lattices
,”
Addit. Manuf.
16
,
24
29
(
2017
).
3.
D. W.
Abueidda
,
M.
Elhebeary
,
C.-S. A.
Shiang
et al, “
Mechanical properties of 3D printed polymeric gyroid cellular structures: Experimental and finite element study
,”
Mater. Des.
165
,
107597
(
2019
).
4.
H. A.
Schwarz
,
Gesammelte Mathematische Abhandlungen
(
American Mathematical Society
,
1972
), Vol.
260
.
5.
E. R.
Neovius
,
Bestimmung Zweier Spezieller Periodischer Minimalflächen, Akad. Abhandlungen
(
Frenckell
,
Helsinki, Finland
,
1883
).
6.
A. H.
Schoen
, “
Infinite periodic minimal surfaces without self-intersections
,”
NASA Technical Report D-5541
(
NASA
,
USA
,
1970
).
7.
J.
Feng
,
J.
Fu
,
X.
Yao
et al, “
Triply periodic minimal surface (TPMS) porous structures: From multi-scale design, precise additive manufacturing to multidisciplinary applications
,”
Int. J. Extreme Manuf.
4
,
022001
(
2022
).
8.
Y.
Cao
,
S.
Lai
,
W.
Wu
et al, “
Design and mechanical evaluation of additively-manufactured graded TPMS lattices with biodegradable polymer composites
,”
J. Mater. Res. Technol.
23
,
2868
2880
(
2023
).
9.
K.
Song
,
Z.
Wang
,
J.
Lan
et al, “
Porous structure design and mechanical behavior analysis based on TPMS for customized root analogue implant
,”
J. Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials
115
,
104222
(
2021
).
10.
J. A.
Dolan
,
B. D.
Wilts
,
S.
Vignolini
et al, “
Optical properties of gyroid structured materials: From photonic crystals to metamaterials
,”
Adv. Opt. Mater.
3
,
12
32
(
2015
).
11.
C.
Pouya
,
J. T. B.
Overvelde
,
M.
Kolle
et al, “
Characterization of a mechanically tunable gyroid photonic crystal inspired by the butterfly Parides sesostris
,”
Adv. Opt. Mater.
4
,
99
105
(
2016
).
12.
W.
Li
,
G.
Yu
, and
Z.
Yu
, “
Bioinspired heat exchangers based on triply periodic minimal surfaces for supercritical CO2 cycles
,”
Appl. Therm. Eng.
179
,
115686
(
2020
).
13.
R.
Attarzadeh
,
M.
Rovira
, and
C.
Duwig
, “
Design analysis of the ‘Schwartz D’ based heat exchanger: A numerical study
,”
Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer
177
,
121415
(
2021
).
14.
J. G.
Werner
,
G. G.
Rodríguez-Calero
,
H. D.
Abruña
et al, “
Block copolymer derived 3D interpenetrating multifunctional gyroidal nanohybrids for electrical energy storage
,”
Energy Environ. Sci.
11
,
1261
1270
(
2018
).
15.
H.
Lei
,
J.
Li
,
Q.
Wang
et al, “
Feasibility of preparing additive manufactured porous stainless steel felts with mathematical micro pore structure as novel catalyst support for hydrogen production via methanol steam reforming
,”
Int. J. Hydrogen Energy
44
,
24782
24791
(
2019
).
16.
D.
Sharma
and
S. S
Hiremath
, “
Additively manufactured mechanical metamaterials based on triply periodic minimal surfaces: Performance, challenges, and application
,”
Mechanics of Advanced Materials and Structures
29
,
5077
5107
(
2022
).
17.
D.
Singh
,
S.
Sharma
,
R.
Kumar
et al, “
Representative volume element model of triply periodic minimal surfaces (TPMS)-based electrostrictive composites for numerical evaluation of effective properties
,”
Acta Mech.
234
,
355
375
(
2023
).
18.
H.
Ramos
,
R.
Santiago
,
S.
Soe
et al, “
Response of gyroid lattice structures to impact loads
,”
Int. J. Impact Eng.
164
,
104202
(
2022
).
19.
X.
Cao
,
H.
Yang
,
X.
Ren
et al, “
Mechanical performance and defect analysis of the imperfect micro smooth gyroid cylinder shell structure
,”
Compos. Struct.
273
,
114320
(
2021
).
20.
D. W.
Holmes
,
D.
Singh
,
R.
Lamont
et al, “
Mechanical behaviour of flexible 3D printed gyroid structures as a tuneable replacement for soft padding foam
,”
Addit. Manuf.
50
,
102555
(
2022
).
21.
D.
Downing
,
A.
Jones
,
M.
Brandt
et al, “
Increased efficiency gyroid structures by tailored material distribution
,”
Mater. Des.
197
,
109096
(
2021
).
22.
M.
Alizadeh-Osgouei
,
Y.
Li
,
A.
Vahid
et al, “
High strength porous PLA gyroid scaffolds manufactured via fused deposition modeling for tissue-engineering applications
,”
Smart Mater. Med.
2
,
15
25
(
2021
).
23.
X.
Li
,
L.
Xiao
, and
W.
Song
, “
Compressive behavior of selective laser melting printed gyroid structures under dynamic loading
,”
Addit. Manuf.
46
,
102054
(
2021
).
24.
M. M.
Sychov
,
L. A.
Lebedev
,
S. V.
Dyachenko
et al, “
Mechanical properties of energy-absorbing structures with triply periodic minimal surface topology
,”
Acta Astronautica
150
,
81
84
(
2018
).
25.
D. W.
Abueidda
,
M.
Bakir
,
R. K. A.
Al-Rub
et al, “
Mechanical properties of 3D printed polymeric cellular materials with triply periodic minimal surface architectures
,”
Mater. Des.
122
,
255
267
(
2017
).
26.
F.
Sadeghi
,
M.
Baniassadi
,
A.
Shahidi
, et al, “
TPMS metamaterial structures based on shape memory polymers: Mechanical,thermal and thermomechanical assessment
,”
J. Materials Research and Technology
23
,
3726
3743
(
2023
).
27.
N.
Novak
,
O.
Al-Ketan
,
L.
Krstulovíc-Opara
et al, “
Quasi-static and dynamic compressive behaviour of sheet TPMS cellular structures
,”
Compos. Struct.
266
,
113801
(
2021
).
28.
S.
Amin Yavari
,
M.
Croes
,
B.
Akhavan
et al, “
Layer by layer coating for bio-functionalization of additively manufactured meta-biomaterials
,”
Addit. Manuf.
32
,
100991
(
2020
).
29.
S.
Ma
,
Q.
Tang
,
X.
Han
et al, “
Manufacturability, mechanical properties, mass-transport properties and biocompatibility of triply periodic minimal surface (TPMS) porous scaffolds fabricated by selective laser melting
,”
Mater. Des.
195
,
109034
(
2020
).
30.
S.
Yu
,
J.
Sun
, and
J.
Bai
, “
Investigation of functionally graded TPMS structures fabricated by additive manufacturing
,”
Mater. Des.
182
,
108021
(
2019
).
31.
A.
Forés-Garriga
,
G.
Gómez-Gras
, and
M. A.
Pérez
, “
Additively manufactured three-dimensional lightweight cellular solids: Experimental and numerical analysis
,”
Mater. Des.
226
,
111641
(
2023
).
32.
S.
Zhang
,
D.
Da
, and
Y.
Wang
, “
TPMS-infill MMC-based topology optimization considering overlapped component property
,”
Int. J. Mech. Sci.
235
,
107713
(
2022
).
33.
Y.
Feng
,
T.
Huang
,
Y.
Gong
et al, “
Stiffness optimization design for TPMS architected cellular materials
,”
Mater. Des.
222
,
111078
(
2022
).
34.
F.
Ren
,
C.
Zhang
,
W.
Liao
et al, “
Transition boundaries and stiffness optimal design for multi-TPMS lattices
,”
Mater. Des.
210
,
110062
(
2021
).
35.
N.
Strömberg
, “
Optimal grading of TPMS-based lattice structures with transversely isotropic elastic bulk properties
,”
Eng. Optim.
53
,
1871
1883
(
2021
).
36.
D.
Li
,
W.
Liao
,
N.
Dai
et al, “
Optimal design and modeling of gyroid-based functionally graded cellular structures for additive manufacturing
,”
Comput.-Aided Des.
104
,
87
99
(
2018
).
37.
S.
Wang
,
Y.
Jiang
,
J.
Hu
et al, “
Efficient representation and optimization of TPMS-based porous structures for 3D heat dissipation
,”
Comput.-Aided Des.
142
,
103123
(
2022
).
38.
X.
Shi
,
W.
Liao
,
T.
Liu
et al, “
Design optimization of multimorphology surface-based lattice structures with density gradients
,”
Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol.
117
,
2013
2028
(
2021
).
39.
D.
Li
,
N.
Dai
,
Y.
Tang
et al, “
Design and optimization of graded cellular structures with triply periodic level surface-based topological shapes
,”
J. Mech. Des.
141
,
071402
(
2019
).
40.
W.
Jiang
,
W.
Liao
,
T.
Liu
et al, “
A voxel-based method of multiscale mechanical property optimization for the design of graded TPMS structures
,”
Mater. Des.
204
,
109655
(
2021
).
41.
L.
Wang
,
Y.
Chan
,
F.
Ahmed
et al, “
Deep generative modeling for mechanistic-based learning and design of metamaterial systems
,”
Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng.
372
,
113377
(
2020
).
42.
A.
Rafsanjani
,
K.
Bertoldi
, and
A. R.
Studart
, “
Programming soft robots with flexible mechanical metamaterials
,”
Sci. Robot.
4
,
eaav7874
(
2019
).
43.
F.
Tian
,
J.
Zeng
,
M.
Zhang
et al, “
Mixed displacement–pressure-phase field framework for finite strain fracture of nearly incompressible hyperelastic materials
,”
Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng.
394
,
114933
(
2022
).
44.
A.
Anssari-Benam
and
C. O.
Horgan
, “
New results in the theory of plane strain flexure of incompressible isotropic hyperelastic materials
,”
Proc. R. Soc. A.
478
,
20210773
(
2022
).
45.
O.
Al‐Ketan
and
R. K.
Abu Al‐Rub
, “
MSLattice: A free software for generating uniform and graded lattices based on triply periodic minimal surfaces
,”
Mat. Des. Process. Commun.
3
,
e205
(
2021
).
46.
W.
Zhang
,
L.
Qin
,
J.
Wang
et al, “
A pixel design method for mechanical metamaterials based on topology optimization
,”
Mech. Adv. Mater. Struct.
20
,
1
9
(
2022
).