We demonstrate that a spintronic terahertz (THz) emitter can be driven by a chirped-pulse beating scheme to generate narrowband THz pulses, with continuous tuning of the frequency and linewidth by simply adjusting the laser chirp and/or the time delay between chirped pulses. As supported by model calculations, temporal shaping of the drive laser pulses can be exploited to manipulate the ultrafast demagnetization dynamics in the thin-film emitter, modulating the spin-polarized current in the ferromagnetic layer to access multi-cycle THz emission. Using a regenerative amplifier laser system with 50 fs transform-limited pulses chirped to 6 ps, we demonstrate narrowband THz generation over a frequency range from 0.4 to 2.3 THz, in addition to linewidths down to 40 GHz using 12 ps chirped pulses. Our proof-of-concept results pave the way to future narrowband THz sources with subgigahertz linewidth and center frequencies continuously tunable from 0.1 to 30 THz. By combining with the advantageous properties of spintronic THz emitters, from straightforward implementation to flexible polarization control, these sources open up opportunities for narrowband applications over the entire THz spectral range.
Underpinned by early experiments on ultrafast laser-induced ferromagnetic (FM) demagnetization,1 the development of spintronic terahertz (THz) emitters by Kampfrath et al.2 has initiated rapid progress that has established these nm-scale metallic heterostructures as unique sources in the field of THz science.3 They offer high-field (>1 MV/cm),4 ultra-broadband (up to 30 THz),5 gap-free emission with photo-excitation over a wide spectral range, no phase-matching or complex alignment requirements, and low-cost fabrication that is scalable to large sizes.6 Additionally, they can provide flexible polarization control using external magnetic fields7–9 and even field-free operation exploiting magnetic anisotropy.9 These desirable properties have been exclusively demonstrated with broadband single-cycle THz pulses, but there is significant interest in the generation and exploitation of laser-driven narrowband THz sources, with applications across a broad range of research areas including selective excitation of resonant modes (in layered superconductors,10 quantum wells,11 and ferroelectric thin films12), non-linear microscopy,13 and compact particle accelerators.14
Numerous materials combined with various optical techniques have been used to achieve narrowband THz generation. These include chirped-pulse beating schemes in photoconductive antennas,15–17 organic materials (HMQ-TMS,18 OH1,19 DSTMS20), inorganic non-linear crystals (ZnTe,21 LiNbO322), and air-plasma,23 as well as difference frequency generation in GaSe24 and DSTMS,25 quasi-phase-matching schemes in periodically poled GaAs,26 GaP,27 LiNbO3,28–30 and Rb:KTP31 crystals, and parametric generation schemes.32–34 Recent alternatives include phase-matched optical rectification in a range of bulk crystals35 and the use of an echelon in a bulk LiNbO3 crystal.36
Given the advantageous properties of spintronic THz emitters (STEs), the additional capability for narrowband emission has already begun to attract interest. Excitation of ferrimagnetic nanofilms with fs laser pulses has been shown to emit narrowband pulses with center frequencies ranging from 0.20 to 0.35 THz dependent on film composition,37 while theoretical models have explored acoustically mediated spintronic emitters based on magneto-elastic heterostructures for converting fs laser pulses into ns-scale multi-cycle THz pulses.38 A scheme combining an echelon, digital micro-mirror device, and a spintronic emitter has demonstrated the generation of THz pulse trains,39 and photo-mixing has been used to produce a narrow-linewidth continuous-wave THz source.40 These works highlight potential future opportunities in areas of on-chip THz emitters, THz magnonic devices, and fast THz communication, yet key limitations in power, tunability, and complexity of these narrowband THz generation schemes remain.
In this Letter, we demonstrate that spintronic THz emitters can be driven with a simple chirped-pulse beating scheme to produce frequency- and bandwidth-tunable multi-cycle THz pulses. The simple optical setup, capability to scale to high fields through high-power laser amplifier systems and access to the unique properties of spintronic emitters make this an ideal source for narrowband applications over the entire THz spectral range.
Spintronic THz emitters exploit the interplay between ferromagnetic (FM) and non-magnetic (NM) thin films, using an ultrashort laser pulse to drive a spin-polarized current in the FM layer that is converted into a transverse charge current in the NM layer by the inverse spin-Hall effect. This ultrafast current generates single-cycle THz pulses polarized perpendicular to the magnetization of the FM layer, with a broadband spectrum only limited by the optical bandwidth of the drive laser.2,3 The same ultrafast laser-induced dynamics can, however, be manipulated by temporal and spectral shaping of the drive laser to control the THz emission, which we demonstrate through the optical technique of chirped-pulse beating to generate narrowband THz pulses.
As first reported by Weling et al.,15 chirped-pulse beating involves the interferometric combination of two (or more) chirped laser pulses with a time delay (τ), resulting in an intensity modulation of the laser pulse profile at a frequency given by ,19 where and correspond to the FWHM duration of the transform-limited and chirped pulse intensities, respectively. This modulated laser pulse can be used to drive multi-cycle THz generation with a center frequency of over a range corresponding to the optical bandwidth of the laser pulse, with an intensity linewidth ,19 providing narrowband THz pulses with simple frequency and bandwidth tuning controlled by the chirp and/or time delay.
To experimentally demonstrate chirped-pulse beating in a spintronic emitter, laser pulses from a commercial (Coherent, Legend) Ti:sapphire regenerative amplifier (1 mJ pulse energy, 1 kHz repetition rate, 800 nm central wavelength, 50 fs transform-limited pulse duration) were positively chirped (6 ps or 12 ps FWHM) by detuning the compressor and routed to a home-made Gires–Tournois etalon consisting of a 38% partial reflector (PR) and 100% high-reflector (HR), as shown in Fig. 1. The adjustable etalon gap, d, provided a tunable time delay of between laser pulses. The etalon produced a train of chirped pulses (with 38% of the laser energy in each of the first two pulses) as indicated in the inset of Fig. 1, providing negligible power loss (all reflections contribute to THz generation) and improved interferometric stability compared to a standard Michelson interferometer. Due to the multiple reflections, the etalon-based scheme does result in the generation of THz harmonics,22 which may not be desirable for certain applications. It should also be noted that while harmonic suppression due to phase-mismatch has been observed in organic crystal THz sources,18 this cannot be achieved in spintronic emitters as the generation process does not involve phase-matching.
Schematic diagram of the experimental setup for chirped-pulse beating in a spintronic THz emitter (STE). Inset: Concept of etalon-based chirped-pulse beating, using tunable separation d of the partial (PR) and high (HR) reflectors to control the time delay τ and corresponding beat frequency of the modulated laser pulse.
Schematic diagram of the experimental setup for chirped-pulse beating in a spintronic THz emitter (STE). Inset: Concept of etalon-based chirped-pulse beating, using tunable separation d of the partial (PR) and high (HR) reflectors to control the time delay τ and corresponding beat frequency of the modulated laser pulse.
The temporal intensity modulated laser pulse was used to generate multi-cycle THz pulses in a trilayer spintronic THz emitter, which were routed and focused by a 90° off-axis parabolic mirror with a 50.8 mm focal length onto a 500 μm-thick (110)-cut ZnTe crystal. Residual laser pump light transmitted through the spintronic emitter was blocked using a combination of an ITO-coated fused silica plate followed by a high resistivity float zone (HRFZ)-Si wafer. A probe laser pulse, separated off by transmission through a 90(R)/10(T) beam splitter, was compressed back to its transform-limited 50 fs pulse duration with a grating-pair compressor and then used in a backreflection geometry for THz pulse measurements in a standard electro-optic sampling scheme. The backreflection geometry is a convenient approach, which allows greater control over the probe beam alignment independent of the THz focusing optics. For single-cycle THz measurements, the output of the regenerative amplifier laser was fully compressed and the etalon partial reflector was removed to excite the source with a single 50 fs pulse, while using the undiffracted zeroth-order from the probe grating compressor for detection.
The trilayer spintronic emitter had a nominal structure W (2 nm)/Co20Fe60B20 (2 nm)/Pt (2 nm) and was deposited onto a double-side polished 0.5 mm-thick fused silica substrate using DC-magnetron sputtering. The base pressure of the system was below 5 × Torr, and the Ar working gas was maintained at a pressure of 3 mTorr. No magnetic fields were applied during the deposition. Actual deposited layer thicknesses were determined using x-ray reflectivity (XRR) measurements, which are shown in the supplementary material. A saturating external magnetic field of 23 mT was applied in the plane of the film (vertically) to generate horizontally polarized THz pulses. Laser excitation with 0.7 mJ pulse energy and 20 mm ( ) spot size provided a fluence of approximately 0.2 mJ/cm2. All experiments were performed at room temperature in a dry-air purged environment with a relative humidity of approximately 10%.
The spintronic emitter was first characterized in the standard single-cycle configuration to aid optimization and analysis of the multi-cycle emission. This included extracting THz reflection features in the time domain, which were removed using a simple subtraction algorithm (see the supplementary material on THz waveform reflection removal) to minimize distortions to the longer overlapping multi-cycle pulses. The reflection-corrected single-cycle waveform and corresponding broadband THz spectral intensity profile of the spintronic source are shown in Figs. 2(a) and 2(b), with a bandwidth of approximately 3 THz. The electric field amplitude of the single-cycle emission was calculated, as described by Cliffe et al.,41 to be 9 kV/cm. The chirped-pulse beating scheme was then implemented with laser pulses chirped to 6 ps FWHM (as measured by an intensity autocorrelator assuming a sech2 pulse shape) with the generated multi-cycle THz waveforms and corresponding spectra shown in Figs. 2(c) and 2(d). By tuning the etalon spacing ( 42–232 μm), the equivalent time delays (τ = 0.28–1.55 ps) resulted in center frequencies ranging from 0.4 to 2.3 THz, the approximate range over which our experimental configuration detected the single-cycle emission. In comparison with the single-cycle emission, the electric field amplitude of the multi-cycle emission was calculated to be 0.6 kV/cm at 0.7 THz, a value consistent with the factor of approximately 100 increase in the pump pulse duration, and the concurrent decrease in the pump intensity. The multi-peak structure appearing on the intensity spectra in Fig. 2(d) as the frequency increases is a Fourier-transform artifact resulting from a non-complete removal of the substrate/air reflection in the THz waveform at 6.7 ps (see the supplementary material on reflection removal).
(a) Single-cycle THz waveform emitted by the spintronic emitter when driven by a single transform-limited (50 fs) laser pulse and (b) corresponding intensity spectrum. (c) Multi-cycle THz waveforms generated by the chirped-pulse beating scheme using = 6 ps for variable τ from 0.28 to 1.55 ps, with (d) the corresponding narrowband intensity spectra ranging from 0.4 to 2.3 THz. The THz waveforms and intensity spectra are normalized and vertically offset for clarity (see the supplementary material on THz spectra for un-normalized intensity spectra). The arrows indicate the position of the second harmonic peaks.
(a) Single-cycle THz waveform emitted by the spintronic emitter when driven by a single transform-limited (50 fs) laser pulse and (b) corresponding intensity spectrum. (c) Multi-cycle THz waveforms generated by the chirped-pulse beating scheme using = 6 ps for variable τ from 0.28 to 1.55 ps, with (d) the corresponding narrowband intensity spectra ranging from 0.4 to 2.3 THz. The THz waveforms and intensity spectra are normalized and vertically offset for clarity (see the supplementary material on THz spectra for un-normalized intensity spectra). The arrows indicate the position of the second harmonic peaks.
As expected, and observed previously by Chen et al.22 using a LiNbO3 THz source, an etalon-based chirped-pulse beating scheme generates THz harmonics, see Fig. 2(d). These features are evident for the lower fundamental frequencies (for example at 0.7 and 1.0 THz) where the second harmonics (1.4 and 2.0 THz) reside within the THz frequency range afforded by the response function of the ZnTe detection crystal and the optical bandwidth of the laser pulse. In addition, is observed to increase with , from 128 GHz at 0.4 THz to 287 GHz at 2.3 THz, as shown in Fig. 3. This spectral broadening was attributed to higher-order phase modulation15 inherent to chirped-pulse amplification (CPA)-based laser systems, where third-order dispersion adds curvature to the chirp that results in varying along the duration of the chirped pulse beating output.
Linewidth of the THz intensity spectra in Fig. 2(d) as a function of the THz center frequency. The blue line is the result of a model calculation described in the main text (and supplementary material), where the cubic phase coefficient α has a value of 0.045 rad/ps3. Inset: The intensity spectra from the model calculations.
Linewidth of the THz intensity spectra in Fig. 2(d) as a function of the THz center frequency. The blue line is the result of a model calculation described in the main text (and supplementary material), where the cubic phase coefficient α has a value of 0.045 rad/ps3. Inset: The intensity spectra from the model calculations.
To verify our experimental results and develop a greater understanding of the multi-cycle THz generation process in a spintronic emitter, we considered the dynamics of the generated spin-polarized current. The microscopic 3-temperature model (M3TM)42,43 is commonly used to determine the temporal dynamics of laser demagnetization, which in turn has been shown to share identical physical processes with laser-induced spin current generation,44–47 since the generated spin current is proportional to the rate of change in the magnetization. The M3TM describes the temperature dependence of the electrons and phonons, and through a series of differential equations that couple with each other, the temporal evolution of the magnetization.
As detailed in the supplementary material, our M3TM calculations used a CoFeB/Pt bilayer source instead of a W/CoFeB/Pt trilayer to simplify the calculation, with parameter values summarized in Table S2. The model provided the temperature variation of electrons and phonons in the CoFeB and Pt layers after laser excitation, and the resulting laser-induced demagnetization in the CoFeB layer. Consequently, the temporal profile and spectrum of the spin current js were obtained from the temporal derivative of the magnetization of the CoFeB layer. For our chirped-pulse-beating scheme, the temporally modulated laser pulse drove corresponding modulation of the and dynamics, and ultimately the demagnetization, forming a multi-cycle spin current that led to generation of multi-cycle THz pulses.
The inset of Fig. 3 shows the output from our model calculations, verifying that the narrowband THz emission is accompanied by an increase in with . It should be noted that, using the approach of Weling et al.,15 the expression for the chirped-pulse beating intensity modulation was modified to include an additional chirp modulation term, , where the cubic phase coefficient, α, was fixed at a value of α = 0.045 rad/ps3 in order to account for the quadratic chirp of our laser pulses (inherent to CPA-based laser systems, as highlighted in the discussion of the experimental data and by Jolly et al.48) and reproduce the experimental data in Fig. 2(d). The cubic phase coefficient, α, can be used to calculate the frequency sweep rate of the resulting linearly chirped THz pulses (given by ), giving values ranging from to Hz/s which are consistent with values reported in the literature when using a grating-based pulse stretcher.49 A comparison of from both experiment and model is shown in Fig. 3 and demonstrates good correlation, although some experimental linewidth values are clearly distorted by the Fourier-transform oscillation artifact (discussed earlier). Without the inclusion of the chirp modulation term was constant at 107 GHz.
While spectral broadening due to cubic phase modulation can be suppressed by modifying the relative spectral phase of the chirped pulses,48 or eliminated by using a second grating pair,50 we simply demonstrate the capability for narrower linewidth emission from a spintronic THz emitter by chirping the laser pulse to approximately 12 ps and tuning the emission to 0.4 THz (where the contribution from the cubic phase modulation is reduced). The resulting THz intensity spectrum is shown in Fig. 4 and the corresponding waveform in the inset. At a center frequency of = 0.4 THz (with the second harmonic observed at 0.8 THz), a linewidth of = 41 GHz was achieved. The linewidth is consistent with the values reported by Adamonis et al.17 using a photoconductive antenna, where linewidths of 50–65 GHz over the frequency range 0.19–1 THz were achieved with a laser pulse that was chirped to 15 ps.
The measured narrowband THz intensity spectrum for chirped-pulse beating in the spintronic THz emitter using a chirped laser pulse duration of approximately 12 ps. Inset: Corresponding THz waveform.
The measured narrowband THz intensity spectrum for chirped-pulse beating in the spintronic THz emitter using a chirped laser pulse duration of approximately 12 ps. Inset: Corresponding THz waveform.
In conclusion, we demonstrate that spintronic THz emitters can be driven with a simple chirped-pulse beating scheme to produce frequency- and bandwidth-tunable multi-cycle THz pulses. Model calculations reveal that this is possible as the intensity modulation generated from the interferometric combination of two chirped pulses can be converted into a modulation of the spin-polarized current due to the rapid demagnetization of the ferromagnetic film.42 Given the gap-free ultra-broadband nature of spintronic THz emission shown previously with ultrashort 10 fs drive pulses and that 10 fs pulses can be chirped to nearly 1 ns,51 our proof-of-concept results pave the way toward a narrowband THz source with subgigahertz linewidth and center frequency continuously tunable over the entire THz spectral range from 0.1 to 30 THz.
SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL
See the supplementary material for details of the x-ray reflectivity measurements, reflection removal from the THz waveforms, and the model calculations describing the multi-cycle THz generation mechanism in the spintronic emitter.
This work was supported by the United Kingdom Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (Grant No. EP/S033688/1). We also wish to acknowledge the Ph.D. scholarship support for R. Ji by the China Scholarship Council (NSCIS Grant No. 201906120039).
AUTHOR DECLARATIONS
Conflict of Interest
The authors have no conflicts to disclose.
Author Contributions
Ruidong Ji: Data curation (equal); Formal analysis (lead); Writing – original draft (equal); Writing – review & editing (equal). Morgan T. Hibberd: Conceptualization (equal); Data curation (equal); Writing – original draft (equal); Writing – review & editing (equal). Cheng-Han Lin: Data curation (supporting); Writing – review & editing (supporting). David Alan Walsh: Data curation (supporting); Writing – review & editing (supporting). Thomas Thomson: Funding acquisition (equal); Project administration (equal); Supervision (equal); Writing – review & editing (supporting). Paul W. Nutter: Funding acquisition (equal); Project administration (equal); Supervision (equal); Writing – review & editing (supporting). Darren M. Graham: Conceptualization (equal); Funding acquisition (equal); Project administration (equal); Supervision (lead); Writing – original draft (equal); Writing – review & editing (equal).
DATA AVAILABILITY
The data that support the findings of this study are openly available in Zenodo at https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10035574, Ref. 52.