Photomultiplication type quasi-planar all-polymer photodetectors (PM-QAPDs) are fabricated with P3HT/PY-IT as active layers by employing a sequential spin-coating method. The part of PY-IT can penetrate into a P3HT layer to emerge isolated electron-traps formed with PY-IT surrounded by P3HT. The trapped electron distribution near an Al electrode will determine the spectral response range of PM-QAPDs. Broadband PM-QAPDs can be achieved with a 0.25 μm thick P3HT layer and a ultra-thin PY-IT layer prepared from 1 mg/ml solution, exhibiting a broad response from 320 to 870 nm. An external quantum efficiency (EQE) value of optimal PM-QAPDs approaches 16 000% at 360 nm under −12 V bias. When the thickness of the P3HT layer is increased to 2.4 μm, the PM-QAPDs exhibit a narrowband response from 630 to 870 nm, which can be well explained according to the Beer–Lambert law. The work may provide a smart strategy to adjust response range of PM-QAPDs by alerting the thickness of the donor layer.

Photodetectors are indispensable due to their great potential applications in electronic components, such as image-sensing, optical-communication, environmental, biological monitoring, and night vision imaging, especially for the photodetectors with near-infrared light response ability.1–4 Polymer photodetectors (PPDs) attract great attention during the recent years due to the rapid development of organic semiconducting materials with tunable optical bandgap.5,6 An External quantum efficiency (EQE) value of photodiode type PPDs is lower than 100%, which is commonly determined by the efficiencies of charge-collection, exciton-dissociation, and photon-harvesting.7–9 The relatively low EQE of photodiode type PPDs will limit its application in the field of weak light detection. In 2015, Li et al. reported a trap-assisted photomultiplication type polymer photodetector (PM-PPDs) by employing poly(3-hexylthiophene-2,5-diyl) (P3HT):6,6]-phenyl-C71-butyric acid methyl ester (PC71BM) with 100:1 weight ratio as active layers.10 The special active layers contain a continuous hole transport channels formed by P3HT and plenty of isolated electron-trap formed by P3HT/PC71BM/P3HT. The EQE values of PM-PPDs are much larger than 100% under −10 V bias, also keeping rather low dark current density (JD).11 The PM-PPDs exhibit great potential in weak light detection due to the large photo-induced current density (JPI), the JPI of PM-PPDs originates from the charge tunneling-injection rather than the photoelectric conversion process. Chung et al. reported a photomultiplication type quasi-planar polymer photodetectors by employing a relatively thick P3HT layer and A super-thin PC71BM layer, part of PC71BM can permeate into P3HT layer to emerge some isolated electron-traps on the top surface of donor layers.12 The quasi-planar structure can offer an efficient hole transport channel in the donor layer without electron traps, leading to the well suppressed charge recombination in the donor layer for better performance of quasi-planar P3HT/PC71BM based photodetectors.13 The previously reported quasi-planar PM-PPDs exhibit a spectral response range in the visible light range. It can be envisioned that electron traps formed with polymer acceptor surrounded by the polymer donor will improve its stability due to the tangled polymer side chains, which should be beneficial to further optimize the performance of PM-QAPDs. In fact, there is great challenge to adjust the spectral response range of PM-PPDs. Yang et al. proposed a dual-band PM-PPDs with one photon harvesting layer and one PM layer. The optimal dual-band PM-PPDs exhibit EQE of 2800% at 350 nm with FWHM of 80 nm under +10 V bias, achieving the EQE values of 7500% at 430 nm and 5200% at 600 nm under −10 V bias.14 Liu et al. reported a ternary strategy by incorporating an ultranarrow bandgap material as the third component, achieving broad spectral response from 350 to 950 nm.15 It should be highlighted that a quasi-planar structure can provide a simple and efficient method to adjust spectral response range of PM-QAPDs by altering the thickness of the donor layer.

In this study, PM-QAPDs were fabricated by employing the structure of indium tin oxide (ITO)/poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene):poly (styrene sulfonate) (PEDOT:PSS)/P3HT/Poly[2,2′-((2Z,2′Z)–((12,13-bis(2-octyldodecyl)-3,9-diundecyl-12,13dihydro[1,2,5]thiadiazolo[3,4e]thieno[2′′,3′′:4′,5′]thieno[2′,3′:4,5]pyrrolo[3,2-g]thieno[2′,3′:4,5]thieno[3,2-b]-indole-2,10-diyl)bis(methanylylidene))bis(5-methyl-3-oxo-2,3-dihydro-1H-indene-2,1-diylidene)) dimalononitrile-co-2,5-thiophene] (PY-IT)/Al, P3HT layer thickness was adjusted from 0.25 to 2.4 μm by spin-coating chlorobenzene solutions with the concentrations of 50, 60, or 80 mg/ml, and the ultra-thin PY-IT layer was prepared from chloroform solution with the concentrations from 0.5 to 2 mg/ml. The device schematic diagram of PM-QAPDs, energy level, and chemical structures are shown in Figs. 1(a)–1(c). PY-IT is deliberately selected as the acceptor due to its suitable energy levels matched with P3HT to form 0.8 eV deep electron traps. The depth of electron traps is determined by the lowest unoccupied molecular orbital (LUMO) level of P3HT and PY-IT. Meanwhile, polymer PY-IT with a narrow optical bandgap of 1.8 eV has strong photon harvesting ability in long wavelength range, leading to the near infrared light response of PM-QAPDs. The relatively deep highest occupied molecular orbital (HOMO) level (−5.6 eV) of PY-IT can also hamper hole injection under dark conditions. The absorption spectra of films were obtained by a Shimadzu UV-2600 PC spectrophotometer. The absorption spectra of PY-IT, P3HT, and P3HT/PY-IT films are shown in Fig. 1(d), and the quasi-planar structure should be formed due to the co-existence of two absorption peaks (one for P3HT and the other one for PY-IT) in the absorption spectrum of P3HT/PY-IT film. In fact, one donor layer/one acceptor layer structure has been commonly reported by a sequential spin-coating method in the field of polymer solar cells (PSCs), the quasi-planar PSCs also exhibit excellent performance in comparisons with the corresponding bulk heterojunction PSCs with the same donor and acceptor materials.16,17 The EQE values of PM-QAPDs with 0.25 μm thick P3HT layer arrives to 9900% under a reverse bias of −10 V, benefiting from efficient hole tunneling-injection from an external-circuit induced by interfacial trapped electron near an Al electrode.18 The response of PM-QAPDs covers from 320 to 870 nm, which can be well explained by absorption spectra of PY-IT and P3HT films. When P3HT layer thickness is increased from 0.8 to 2.4 μm, the response of PM-QAPDs could be markedly narrowed by suppressing short-wavelength response. The narrowed response spectra of PM-QAPDs can be sufficiently explained from the principle of interfacial trap-assisted charge tunneling-injection.19 The quasi-planar strategy can offer a smart strategy to realize narrowband PM-QAPDs by adjusting the thickness of the donor layer according to the Beer–Lambert law.20 

FIG. 1.

(a) Device schematic diagram of PM-QAPDs. (b) Chemical structures of PY-IT and P3HT. (c) Energy levels of PY-IT and P3HT. (d) Normalized absorption spectra of neat P3HT, PY-IT, and P3HT/PY-IT films.

FIG. 1.

(a) Device schematic diagram of PM-QAPDs. (b) Chemical structures of PY-IT and P3HT. (c) Energy levels of PY-IT and P3HT. (d) Normalized absorption spectra of neat P3HT, PY-IT, and P3HT/PY-IT films.

Close modal

Series of ultra-thin PY-IT layers were prepared onto 0.25 μm thick P3HT layers by spin-coating chloroform solution with the concentrations of 0.5 to 2 mg/ml to investigate the effect of acceptor layer thickness on performance of PM-QAPDs. The J–V curves of PM-QAPDs were investigated by using a Keithley 2400 source meter under −10 to 1 V bias in the dark or at 1.5 mW/cm2 white-light illumination, as exhibited in Fig. 2(a). Obviously, the JD of PM-QAPDs is slightly increased with the increasing of PY-IT solution concentration, which should be ascribed to partial electron percolation pathway in the P3HT layer due to the sufficient permeation of PY-IT. The light-current density (JL) of PM-QAPDs is increased and then decreased dependence on PY-IT solution concentration increasing. The JL of PM-QAPDs originates from hole tunneling-injection assisted by trapped-electron near the Al electrode.16 The thickness of PY-IT layer is increased along with PY-IT solution concentration increasing, which will result in the P3HT/PY-IT interface far-away from the Al electrode. If trapped electrons are far-away from the Al electrode, which can hardly induce sufficient interfacial band-bending for hole tunneling-injection.21,22 The increased and then decreased JL of PM-QAPD dependence on PY-IT layer thickness can be well explained on the basis of the interfacial trap-assisted hole injection theory.23 The JPI is stipulated as the distinction of JL and JD for evaluating photodetection ability. The JPI vs applied bias (JPIV) curves of PM-QAPDs are exhibited in Fig. 2(b). The JPI of PM-QAPDs are increased and then decreased along with the increased thickness of PY-IT layer preparing from different concentration PY-IT solutions. The optimal JPI can be obtained in the PM-QAPDs with PY-IT (1 mg/ml) as an acceptor layer, also preserving JD as low as possible.

FIG. 2.

(a) JV curves of the PM-QAPDs at distinct conditions and (b) JPIV curves and the signal-to-noise ratio curves of the PM-QAPDs.

FIG. 2.

(a) JV curves of the PM-QAPDs at distinct conditions and (b) JPIV curves and the signal-to-noise ratio curves of the PM-QAPDs.

Close modal

Signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) of PM-QAPDs is achieved from the ratios of JPI to JD for evaluating its photodetection ability from intrinsic noise signal.24–26 The SNR of PM-QAPDs with distinct PY-IT layer thickness dependence on bias are shown in Fig. 2(b). The PM-QAPDs based on PY-IT (1 mg/ml) as acceptor layers exhibit larger SNR than that of PM-QAPDs with PY-IT (0.5, 1.5, and 2 mg/ml) as acceptor layers, resulting from relatively low JD. The PM-QAPDs with PY-IT (1 mg/ml) as acceptor layers show the maximal SNR values when the bias is larger than −4 V, benefiting from the well suppressed JD. The suppressed JD is one of efficient strategies to increase SNR of PM-QAPDs. After well-contrasting the JPI and SNR of PM-QAPDs, optimal concentration of PY-IT solution should be 1 mg/ml for achieving highly sensitive PM-QAPDs.

EQE spectra of optimal PM-QAPDs were investigated under distinct bias by using a Keithley 2400 source meter and a 150 W Xenon lamp coupled with a monochromator, as displayed in Fig. 3(a). The spectral range of Xenon lamp covers from 300 to 1000 nm. The incident light intensity of monochromatic light can be adjusted by inserting neutral attenuating tablets, which was measured by utilizing a Thorlabs S120VC power meter. The EQE of PM-QAPDs is defined as the ratio of the number of charge carriers received by the electrode to the number of incident photons, which can be estimated according to the following equation:
EQE = J p i h v P i n q ,
where h is the Planck constant of 6.6 × 10−34 J⋅s, ν is the frequency of incident light, and q is the elementary charge of 1.6 × 10−19 C. The EQE values of optimal PM-QAPDs are markedly increased from 3000% to 16 000% along with bias from −6 to −12 V because hole injection and transport can be enhanced under larger bias.27 EQE spectral shape of PM-QAPDs can be kept constant at distinct bias, which is well explained from the fixed photogenerated electron distribution near the P3HT/PY-IT interface. It is reported that EQE spectral shape of PM-QAPDs with the bulk heterojunction structure will be changed under different bias due to trapped-electron density variation near the Al electrode, because photogenerated electrons would like to migrate toward the Al electrode at larger bias.28 Specific detectivity (D*) is used to estimate photon detection ability of PM-QAPDs, which is calculated by the following equation:
D * = λ EQE λ 1240 2 e J D ,
where e is the elementary-charge, λ is the incident-light wavelength. D* values of optimal PM-QAPDs are 3.9 × 1013 Jones/360 nm and 4.4 × 1013 Jones/630 nm at −12 V bias, indicating excellent photodetection-ability of the PM-QAPDs. Transient photocurrent (TPC) of PM-QAPDs was measured on the Zahner Electrochemical Workstation under 1.5 mW/cm2 803 nm light illumination, as shown in Fig. 3(c). The response and recovery times are evaluated from the time-interval of TPC increasing from 10% to 90% of maximal-current-density (Jmax) and TPC decreasing from 90% to 10% of Jmax, respectively.29–31 The response and recovery times of PM-QAPDs are approximately 249 and 216 ms when the light is turned on/off. The linear dynamic range (LDR) is one of the important performance parameters to stand for the linear responsivity range, as calculated by the following equation:32–35 
LDR = 20 log P max P min d B ,
where Pmin and Pmax denote the minimum and maximum detectable light-intensity within a linear range, respectively. The LDR of the optimized broadband PM-QAPDs arrives at 103 dB at −10 V bias under light intensity altering from 42.9 to 0.57 W/cm2, as exhibited in Fig. 3(d).
FIG. 3.

(a) EQE spectra and (b) D* of optimal PM-QAPDs at distinct bias. (c) Normalized TPC curves measured at 803 nm light condition. (d) LDR of PM-QAPDs at −10 V bias.

FIG. 3.

(a) EQE spectra and (b) D* of optimal PM-QAPDs at distinct bias. (c) Normalized TPC curves measured at 803 nm light condition. (d) LDR of PM-QAPDs at −10 V bias.

Close modal

The thickness of P3HT layer is adjusted from 0.8 to 2.4 μm to investigate the P3HT/PY-IT interfacial trapped-electron distribution on the EQE spectral shape of PM-QAPDs. The JV curves of PM-QAPDs with distinct P3HT layer thickness are displayed in Fig. 4(a). It is obvious that JD of PM-QAPDs is markedly suppressed by increasing P3HT layer thickness. Meanwhile, the JL values of PM-QAPDs are also decreased by increasing P3HT layer thickness, originating from weakened hole tunneling-injection due to the decreased trapped-electron density near the Al electrode.36 It is envisaged that photogenerated charge distribution in P3HT layer is easily adjusted by changing active layer thickness, which will influence trapped-electron density near the Al electrode.37,38 The EQE spectra of PM-QAPDs with the distinct P3HT layer thickness were investigated at −10 V bias, as shown in Fig. 4(b). It is obvious that the EQE values of PM-QAPDs are decreased as the P3HT layer thickness increasing, especially in the 400–600 nm wavelength range related to photon-harvesting of P3HT films. Thick P3HT layer can harvest most of incident photon in the short wavelength range, and more photogenerated excitons in P3HT layers hardly diffuse to P3HT/PY-IT interface and dissociate into the free carrier.39 The less trapped-electron density near the Al electrode is difficult to induce sufficient interfacial band-bending for hole tunneling-injection, resulting in the decreased EQE in the short wavelength range of PM-QAPDs with the thick P3HT layer. When P3HT layer thickness is increased to 2.4 μm, PM-QAPDs exhibit relatively narrow response covering 630–870 nm. The EQE spectra of PM-QAPDs with 2.4 μm thick P3HT layer were investigated at distinct reverse bias, as shown in Fig. 4(c). The EQE values of PM-QAPDs are markedly increased along with reverse bias increasing, which should be on account of the more titled interfacial band-bending and the enhanced hole transport in active layers at larger bias.15,40 The EQE values of PM-QAPDs are increased to 970% at 780 nm at −40 V bias. The EQE spectral shape of PM-QAPDs with 2.4 μm thick P3HT layer can be well explained from absorption spectra of corresponding P3HT/PY-IT layers, as displayed in Fig. 4(d). The P3HT/PY-IT layers have sufficient photon-harvesting-ability in short wavelength range and weak photon-harvesting-ability in the range from 630 to 870 nm. Most of the photons with short wavelength are effectively harvested by P3HT and these photogenerated excitons are hardly dissociated into free carrier, leading to the rather weak photo-response of PM-QAPDs in short wavelength range. The photons with wavelength from 630 to 870 nm are sufficiently harvested by PY-IT and these photogenerated excitons are dissociated into free carrier at P3HT/PY-IT interface. These photogenerated-electrons will be trapped in PY-IT surrounded by P3HT, and trapped-electron will induce the interfacial band-bending for hole tunneling-injection, leading to relatively remarkable photon-response of PM-QAPDs in the long wavelength range.

FIG. 4.

PM-QAPDs with different P3HT layer thicknesses. (a) J−V curves, (b) EQE spectra, and (c) EQE spectra of the optimized PM-QAPDs at distinct bias. (d) Absorption spectrum of 2.4 μm P3HT/PY-IT layer, and the inserted image is the zoomed-in absorption spectrum.

FIG. 4.

PM-QAPDs with different P3HT layer thicknesses. (a) J−V curves, (b) EQE spectra, and (c) EQE spectra of the optimized PM-QAPDs at distinct bias. (d) Absorption spectrum of 2.4 μm P3HT/PY-IT layer, and the inserted image is the zoomed-in absorption spectrum.

Close modal

In summary, quasi-planar PM-QAPDs were fabricated by sequential spin-coating P3HT and PY-IT layers. The part of PY-IT can penetrate into P3HT layer to emerge isolated electron-traps with PY-IT surrounded by P3HT. The optimal PY-IT solution concentration is about 1.0 mg/ml by evaluating the JPI and SNR of PM-QAPDs. The spectral response of PM-QAPDs covers from 320 to 870 nm, well corresponding with photon-harvesting range of P3HT/PY-IT layers. The EQE of PM-QAPDs with 0.25 μm thick P3HT layer arrives to 9900% at −10 V bias, which is due to efficient hole tunneling-injection from external-circuit induced by interfacial trapped electrons near the Al electrode. When P3HT layer thickness is increased to 2.4 μm, the optimal PM-QAPDs exhibit relatively narrow response from 630 to 870 nm, resulting from the adjusted trapped-electron distribution near P3HT/PY-IT interface. The quasi-planar strategy should provide an efficient method for achieving PM-QAPDs with tunable spectral response range by alerting the thickness of the donor layer.

The work was financially supported by the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (No. 2022JBZY012), the Natural Science Foundation of Beijing (No. 4232073), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Nos. 61975006 and U22A6002), and the National Natural-Science-Foundation of China-Swedish Foundation for International Cooperation in Research and Higher education (No. 62211530056).

The authors have no conflicts to disclose.

H. Zhang and F. Zhang conceived idea and designed experiments. H. Zhang, M. Liu and X. Zhao fabricated PM-QAPDs. H. Zhang, J. Li and G. Yuan carried out the characterization and analysis on PM-QAPDs. H. Zhang and F. Zhang wrote this manuscript. This manuscript has been fully discussed and revised by authors.

Haolan Zhang: Conceptualization (supporting); Data curation (supporting); Formal analysis (equal); Methodology (equal); Validation (equal); Writing – original draft (supporting); Writing – review & editing (equal). Ming Liu: Formal analysis (equal); Methodology (equal); Supervision (equal). Xingchao Zhao: Formal analysis (equal); Methodology (equal); Supervision (equal). Xiaoling Ma: Methodology (equal); Project administration (equal); Supervision (equal). Guangcai Yuan: Formal analysis (equal); Validation (equal). Junming Li: Formal analysis (equal); Validation (equal). Fujun Zhang: Funding acquisition (supporting); Project administration (equal); Resources (supporting); Software (supporting); Supervision (equal); Writing – original draft (equal); Writing – review & editing (equal).

Data sharing is not applicable to this article as no new data were created or analyzed in this study.

1.
H.
Ren
,
J.-D.
Chen
,
Y.-Q.
Li
, and
J.-X.
Tang
, “
Recent process in organic photodetectors and their applications
,”
Adv. Sci.
8
,
2002418
(
2020
).
2.
D.
Guo
,
L.
Yang
,
J.
Li
et al, “
Panchromatic photomultiplication-type organic photodetectors with planar/bulk heterojunction structure
,”
Sci. China Mater.
66
,
1172
1179
(
2023
).
3.
Z.
Zhao
,
J.
Wang
,
C.
Xu
et al, “
Photomultiplication type broad response organic photodetectors with one absorber layer and one multiplication layer
,”
J. Phys. Chem. Lett.
11
,
366
373
(
2020
).
4.
Q.
Li
,
Y.
Guo
, and
Y.
Liu
, “
Exploration of near-infrared organic photodetectors
,”
Chem. Mater.
31
,
6359
6379
(
2019
).
5.
X.
Liu
,
Y.
Lin
,
Y.
Liao
et al, “
Recent advances in organic near-infrared photodiodes
,”
J. Mater. Chem. C
6
,
3499
3513
(
2018
).
6.
D.
Yang
and
D.
Ma
, “
Development of organic semiconductor photodetectors: From mechanism to applications
,”
Adv. Opt. Mater.
7
,
1800522
(
2019
).
7.
K.
Yang
,
Z.
Zhao
,
M.
Liu
et al, “
Highly sensitive broadband photomultiplication type all-polymer photodetectors and their applications in optical pulse counting
,”
J. Mater. Chem. C
10
,
10888
10894
(
2022
).
8.
J.
Kang
,
J.
Kim
,
H.
Ham
et al, “
High-detectivity green-selective all-polymer p-n junction photodetectors
,”
Adv. Opt. Mater.
8
,
2001038
(
2020
).
9.
K.
Xia
,
Y.
Li
,
Y.
Wang
et al, “
Narrowband-absorption-type organic photodetectors for the far-red range based on fullerene-free bulk heterojunctions
,”
Adv. Opt. Mater.
8
,
1902056
(
2020
).
10.
L.
Li
,
F.
Zhang
,
J.
Wang
et al, “
Achieving EQE of 16,700% in P3HT:PC71BM based photodetectors by trap-assisted photomultiplication
,”
Sci. Rep.
5
,
9181
(
2015
).
11.
W.
Wang
,
M.
Du
,
M.
Zhang
et al, “
Organic photodetectors with gain and broadband/narrowband response under top/bottom illumination conditions
,”
Adv. Opt. Mater.
6
,
1800249
(
2018
).
12.
M. S.
Jang
,
S.
Yoon
,
K. M.
Sim
et al, “
Spatial confinement of the optical sensitizer to realize a thin film organic photodetector with high detectivity and thermal stability
,”
J. Phys. Chem. Lett.
9
,
8
12
(
2018
).
13.
Z.
Zhao
,
C.
Xu
,
Y.
Ma
et al, “
Filter-free narrowband photomultiplication-type planar heterojunction organic photodetectors
,”
Adv. Funct. Mater.
33
,
2212149
(
2023
).
14.
K.
Yang
,
G.
Wang
,
Z.
Zhao
et al, “
Highly sensitive dual-band switchable between ultraviolet and visible region photomultiplication type polymer photodetectors
,”
Adv. Phys. Res.
2
,
2200075
(
2022
).
15.
M.
Liu
,
Q.
Fan
,
K.
Yang
et al, “
Broadband photomultiplication-type polymer photodetetors and its application in light-controlled circuit
,”
Sci. China Chem.
65
,
1642
1649
(
2022
).
16.
W.
Xu
,
M.
Zhang
,
X.
Ma
et al, “
Over 17.4% efficiency of layer-by-layer all-polymer solar cells by improving exciton utilization in acceptor layer
,”
Adv. Funct. Mater.
33
,
2215204
(
2023
).
17.
H.
Zhou
,
L.
Zhang
,
X.
Ma
et al, “
Approaching 18% efficiency of ternary layer-by-layer polymer solar cells with alloyed acceptors
,”
Chem. Eng. J.
462
,
142327
(
2023
).
18.
T.
Park
,
S.
Lee
,
M.
Kang
et al, “
Nanowire-embedded polymer photomultiplication photodiode with EQE over 250,000%
,”
Chem. Eng. J.
418
,
129354
(
2021
).
19.
W.
Jang
,
T.-Q.
Nguyen
, and
D. H.
Wang
, “
Theoretical and experimental investigation of barrier-energy-dependent charge injection mechanisms in organic photodetectors
,”
Adv. Funct. Mater.
33
,
2209615
(
2022
).
20.
K.
Yang
,
Z.
Zhao
,
M.
Liu
et al, “
Employing liquid crystal material as regulator to enhance performance of photomultiplication type polymer photodetectors
,”
Chem. Eng. J.
427
,
131802
(
2022
).
21.
K.
Yang
,
J.
Wang
,
Z.
Zhao
et al, “
Smart strategy: Transparent hole-transporting polymer as a regulator to optimize photomultiplication-type polymer photodetectors
,”
ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces
13
,
21565
21572
(
2021
).
22.
J.
Wang
and
Q.
Zheng
, “
Enhancing the performance of photomultiplication-type organic photodetectors using solution-processed ZnO as an interfacial layer
,”
J. Mater. Chem. C
7
,
1544
1550
(
2019
).
23.
X.
Zhao
,
M.
Liu
,
K.
Yang
et al, “
Photomultiplication type organic photodetectors with different response characteristics under forward or reverse bias
,”
Org. Electron.
108
,
106587
(
2022
).
24.
Y.
Lu
,
J.
Chen
,
T.
Chen
et al, “
Controlling defects in continuous 2D GaS films for high-performance wavelength-tunable UV-discriminating photodetectors
,”
Adv. Mater.
32
,
1906958
(
2020
).
25.
Y.
Wei
,
Z.
Ren
,
A.
Zhang
et al, “
Hybrid organic/PbS quantum dot bilayer photodetector with low dark current and high detectivity
,”
Adv. Funct. Mater.
28
,
1706690
(
2018
).
26.
Z.
Ren
,
J.
Sun
,
H.
Li
et al, “
Bilayer PbS quantum dots for high-performance photodetectors
,”
Adv. Mater.
29
,
1702055
(
2017
).
27.
J.
Kim
,
M.
Kang
,
S.
Lee
et al, “
Interfacial electrostatic-interaction-enhanced photomultiplication for ultrahigh external quantum efficiency of organic photodiodes
,”
Adv. Mater.
33
,
2104689
(
2021
).
28.
W.
Wang
,
F.
Zhang
,
M.
Du
et al, “
Highly narrowband photomultiplication type organic photodetectors
,”
Nano Lett.
17
,
1995
2002
(
2017
).
29.
C.
Li
,
H.
Wang
,
F.
Wang
et al, “
Ultrafast and broadband photodetectors based on a perovskite/organic bulk heterojunction for large-dynamic-range imaging
,”
Light: Sci. Appl.
9
,
31
(
2020
).
30.
S.
Cui
,
Z.
Mei
,
Y.
Zhang
et al, “
Room-temperature fabricated amorphous Ga2O3 high-response-speed solar-blind photodetector on rigid and flexible substrates
,”
Adv. Opt. Mater.
5
,
1700454
(
2017
).
31.
Z.
Zhao
,
B.
Liu
,
C.
Xu
et al, “
Highly stable photomultiplication-type organic photodetectors with single polymers containing intramolecular traps as the active layer
,”
J. Mater. Chem. C
10
,
7822
7830
(
2022
).
32.
H.
Bristow
,
P.
Jacoutot
,
A. D.
Scaccabarozzi
et al, “
Nonfullerene-based organic photodetectors for ultrahigh sensitivity visible light detection
,”
ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces
12
,
48836
48844
(
2020
).
33.
M.
Yao
,
J.
Jiang
,
D.
Xin
et al, “
High-temperature stable FAPbBr3 single crystals for sensitive x-ray and visible light detection toward space
,”
Nano Lett.
21
,
3947
3955
(
2021
).
34.
M.
Kielar
,
T.
Hamid
,
M.
Wiemer
et al, “
Light detection in open-circuit voltage mode of organic photodetectors
,”
Adv. Funct. Mater.
30
,
1907964
(
2020
).
35.
R.
Li
,
J.
Peng
,
Y.
Xu
et al, “
Pseudohalide additives enhanced perovskite photodetectors
,”
Adv. Opt. Mater.
9
,
2001587
(
2021
).
36.
Z.
Zhao
,
C.
Xu
,
Y.
Ma
et al, “
Ultraviolet narrowband photomultiplication type organic photodetectors with Fabry-Pérot resonator architecture
,”
Adv. Funct. Mater.
32
,
2203606
(
2022
).
37.
J.
Wang
,
S.
Ullbrich
,
J.-L.
Hou
et al, “
Organic cavity photodetectors based on nanometer-thick active layers for tunable monochromatic spectral response
,”
ACS Photonics
6
,
1393
1399
(
2019
).
38.
B.
Xie
,
R.
Xie
,
K.
Zhang
et al, “
Self-filtering narrowband high performance organic photodetectors enabled by manipulating localized Frenkel exciton dissociation
,”
Nat. Commun.
11
,
2871
(
2020
).
39.
Z.
Zhao
,
M.
Liu
,
K.
Yang
et al, “
Highly sensitive narrowband photomultiplication-type organic photodetectors prepared by transfer-printed technology
,”
Adv. Funct. Mater.
31
,
2106009
(
2021
).
40.
J.
Kim
,
C.
So
,
M.
Kang
et al, “
A regioregular donor-acceptor copolymer allowing a high gain-bandwidth product to be obtained in photomultiplication-type organic photodiodes
,”
Mater. Horiz.
8
,
276
283
(
2021
).