Based on a space–time-coding (STC) transmissive metasurface (TMS), we present the utilization of electromagnetic harmonic spectra in phaseless near-field microwave computational imaging (CI). Each element of the TMS integrates one PIN diode as a switch to independently regulate the transmission amplitude, giving rise to a 14-dB modulation depth at 21 GHz. Using the TMS and two standard horn antennas, a phaseless near-field microwave CI system is established in a single-pixel manner. A simple and effective space–time-coding scheme is detailed to covert a monochromatic signal into multiple harmonics that can be applied to sample the objects. To obtain the sensing matrix built by the harmonics, we propose a method that is developed from the Fresnel diffraction theory. Moreover, we experimentally validate our CI system by reconstructing two metallic objects. The reported STC scheme and the corresponding CI system using TMS could inspire future studies on low-cost imaging hardware development and harmonic wave utilization for high-resolution CI systems.

Imaging objects through microwaves possesses nonionization and penetrability capabilities compared with infrared, visible light, and x-ray. Therefore, microwave imaging technology was comprehensively investigated for security inspection, e.g., concealed weapon detection and whole-body screening. For such a near-field scenario, microwave holographic imaging was proposed based on the range migration technique.1–5 Furthermore, a general holographic inversion method accelerated by range stacking for linear frequency modulation radar was presented in Refs. 6 and 7. Other methods inspired by the optical domain, such as cubic phase element,8 tomography,9 and incoherent imaging,10 were also implemented in the microwave domain. When we separate the imaging procedure as data acquisition and data post-process, the computational imaging (CI) framework is established, bridging signal processing and microwave imaging.11 Under this viewpoint, existing imaging methods can be described in a compact mathematical form. Then, the compressive sensing (CS) technique is employed to solve the underdetermined problem and to improve the imaging speed and quality.12,13 Note that the above-mentioned studies usually require the raster scanning technique or complex distribution apertures.11,14,15

To reduce the synthetic aperture of raster scanning and multiple detectors, single-pixel imaging via CS was first proposed and realized in light and terahertz bands.16,17 In 2014, by leveraging the frequency-diverse metamaterial aperture, a single-pixel microwave imager was developed and experimentally validated.18 Moreover, various metasurfaces, which are two-dimensional metamaterials, were utilized to realize the CI systems.19–21 Among these metasurfaces, dynamic and programmable metasurfaces gain much attention due to the reconfigurability of sensing modes.22–24 By introducing tunable components, e.g., PIN diode, varactor, and microelectromechanical system (MEMS), one could achieve substantial sampling patterns on the inspected plane for coherent or incoherent imaging.25,26 We mention that the published research works on metasurface-based CI systems mainly operate in the frequency domain without exploiting the time-periodic signals. Recently, space–time-coding (STC) metasurfaces27 that periodically manipulate the digital states of each meta-atom were applied in new architecture wireless communication,28–30 frequency-modulated continuous waves radar,31 electromagnetic nonreciprocity,32,33 and spectral camouflage.34,35 In Ref. 36, the time-modulated technique was adopted to characterize materials assisted by metasurface. Hitherto, the near-field sensing modes using harmonics enabled by the STC metasurface are not investigated in a microwave CI system.

Here, based on a transmissive metasurface (TMS) with a proposed STC scheme, we utilize the harmonics in a phaseless microwave CI system. The meta-atom of the TMS realizes a 1-bit amplitude-reconfigurable operation using the digital idea.37 By applying the proposed STC scheme, which periodically flips the 12 coding blocks of a space coding, the TMS produces randomly distributed near-field harmonics that satisfy the CS theory. Combined with two standard horn antennas and the TMS, we build a CI system with single-frequency excitation and a single-pixel detector. The plane wave angular spectrum (PWAS) method that had been validated in our previous work24,38 is extended to calculate the near-field sensing harmonics. A TMS prototype and the corresponding CI system were experimentally demonstrated. The reconstruction of metallic objects proves that the harmonics generated by the STC scheme are sufficient to achieve a phaseless CI system with low-cost hardware.

As illustrated in Fig. 1, the proposed phaseless near-field CI system consists of a transmitter (Tx), a receiver (Rx), and a TMS. Both the Tx and Rx are standard rectangular horn antennas in K-band. The radiation apertures of Tx, Rx, and TMS are parallel to the xy-plane and located at z = −D′, z = 0, and z = 2D, while the inspected plane locates at z = D. The operation principle of the proposed CI system is described as follows. First, the Tx connected to a signal generator excites the TMS using a monochromatic signal at 21 GHz. Then, after passing across the TMS modulated with a period T, the generated near-field harmonics sample the objects on the inspected plane. The sensing matrix is denoted by H whose row vectors are the sampling harmonics. Next, behind the inspected plane, the Rx connected to a spectrum analyzer measures power levels of harmonics, which is denoted by a column vector of g. We mention that the measured signals are real numbers without phase information. Finally, assuming the object to be imaged is f, in the CI framework, the above procedure can be expressed as

(1)
FIG. 1.

Configuration of the CI system based on TMS with an STC scheme. Tx excites the TMS with a monochromatic signal f0. Using the proposed STC scheme, the TMS converts the signal into a group of harmonics f0 + q/T0 (q = ±1, ±2, ±3, …). The harmonics that sample the object are captured by the Rx.

FIG. 1.

Configuration of the CI system based on TMS with an STC scheme. Tx excites the TMS with a monochromatic signal f0. Using the proposed STC scheme, the TMS converts the signal into a group of harmonics f0 + q/T0 (q = ±1, ±2, ±3, …). The harmonics that sample the object are captured by the Rx.

Close modal

Since g can be readily measured in a single-pixel manner, we should model the sensing matrix for imaging restoration.

Prior to commencing the modeling of the CI system, we present the programmable meta-atom. As shown in Fig. 2(a), the proposed programmable meta-atom has one PIN diode and four layers. The receiving layer and ground (GND) layer are etched on a substrate with a relative permittivity of 3.5 and a thickness of 0.762 mm. The biasing layer and transmitting layer are etched on a substrate with the same parameters. Between the GND layer and the biasing layer, there exists a prepreg substrate with a relative permittivity of 4.2 and a thickness of 0.08 mm. When the PIN diode is turned off, the receiving layer reflects the incident waves, indicating a coding “0” transmission amplitude τ0. When the PIN diode is turned on, the incident waves can be conveyed to the transmitting layer for radiation, indicating a coding “1” transmission amplitude τ1. We note that the presented meta-atom is modified from a phase coding meta-atom, which was used for beam-scanning.39–42 Structural parameters are annotated in Fig. 2(a). The adopted PIN diode and the simulation method had been detailed in our previous study.24 We report the simulated transmissive magnitude of the τ0 and τ1 coding states in Fig. 2(b). The simulation model is also illustrated as an inset in Fig. 2(b). As can be seen, at 21 GHz, the proposed programmable meta-atom has a 14-dB amplitude modulation depth, meeting the STC need for harmonics operations.

FIG. 2.

(a) Geometrical structure of the proposed programmable meta-atom. By turning the on-state or off-state of the PIN diode in the receiving layer, the incident waves can be transmitted or reflected. (b) The simulated transmissive magnitude of the two coding states. The simulation model is illustrated as an inset.

FIG. 2.

(a) Geometrical structure of the proposed programmable meta-atom. By turning the on-state or off-state of the PIN diode in the receiving layer, the incident waves can be transmitted or reflected. (b) The simulated transmissive magnitude of the two coding states. The simulation model is illustrated as an inset.

Close modal

Based on the proposed programmable meta-atom, we elaborate on the modeling of the near-field harmonic distribution of the TMS with the proposed STC scheme. Supposing that the TMS contains M × N programmable meta-atoms with sizes of px × py along the x-direction and y-direction, respectively; thus, on the inspected plane z = D, the time-domain near-field distribution can be expressed as

(2)

where k0 is the free space wavenumber at 21 GHz, EyTx(xm, yn, D) stands for the incident tangential electric field from Tx at each element, τmn(t) is the STC transmission function, and C(u) and S(u) are standard Fresnel integrals with upper limits, defined as

(3)

Equation (2) is extended from the time-independent PWAS method43 that had been applied to analyze an adaptively smart programmable metasurface.38 

We further discuss the proposed STC scheme. As the STC theory implies,28 we can divide the τmn(t) function in Eq. (2) into two dimensions, i.e., space-coding dimension and time-coding dimension. The space-coding dimension is the distribution of τ0 and τ1, while the time-coding dimension is the time-modulated scheme in a period T. Consider a TMS consisting of 12 × 12 programmable meta-atoms presented above, we group and index 12 coding blocks as shown in Fig. 3(a). In the space-coding dimension, each coding block contains one randomly distributed τ1 and another 11 τ0. We illustrate one possible space-coding distribution in Fig. 3(b). In the time-coding dimension, the period T is divided into 12 equal-time slices that correspond to the 12 coding blocks, and each indexed coding block sequentially flips the block's space-coding states (τ0 to τ1 or τ1 to τ0) at each time slice. Under such an STC scheme, the near-field qth (q = 0, ±1, ±2, …) order harmonics on the inspected plane based on Eq. (2) can be determined by

(4)

where τmnq is the Fourier series coefficients of τmn(t), i.e.,

(5)

where I represents the total time slice and τmni constructs the STC matrix whose dimension is M × N × I. We mention that the above STC scheme is described by the STC matrix in Eq. (5), and the Fourier series coefficients for each harmonic are calculated by the STC matrix.28 In Fig. 3(c), we show the STC matrix for the space coding shown in Fig. 3(b). The calculated harmonics including fundamental and qth (q = ±1, ±2, ±3, ±4) harmonics on the D = 150 mm inspected plane are plotted in Fig. 3(d).

FIG. 3.

The proposed STC scheme and the correspondingly calculated harmonics. (a) Indexes of the 12 coding blocks in a TMS containing 12 × 12 meta-atoms. (b) Distribution of a space coding with one randomly distributed τ1 and another 11 τ0 in each coding block. (c) Illustration of the STC matrix in the proposed STC scheme. The period T is divided into 12 equal-time slices. In each time slice, we sequentially flip the space coding (τ0 to τ1 or τ1 to τ0) in each indexed coding block. (d) The calculated fundamental harmonic and the qth order harmonics (q = ±1, ±2, ±3, and ±4) based on the proposed STC scheme.

FIG. 3.

The proposed STC scheme and the correspondingly calculated harmonics. (a) Indexes of the 12 coding blocks in a TMS containing 12 × 12 meta-atoms. (b) Distribution of a space coding with one randomly distributed τ1 and another 11 τ0 in each coding block. (c) Illustration of the STC matrix in the proposed STC scheme. The period T is divided into 12 equal-time slices. In each time slice, we sequentially flip the space coding (τ0 to τ1 or τ1 to τ0) in each indexed coding block. (d) The calculated fundamental harmonic and the qth order harmonics (q = ±1, ±2, ±3, and ±4) based on the proposed STC scheme.

Close modal

From the figures, the significance enabled by the STC technique is twofold. On the one hand, the qth order harmonics present distinct patterns compared with the fundamental harmonic, which can be utilized for CI. On the other hand, the generated harmonics remarkably increase the sensing modes using one randomly distributed space coding compared with the dynamic metasurfaces, which use one randomly distributed space coding as one sensing mode.22 We mention that the peak intensities of the qth (|q| > 0) order harmonics are about −10 dB lower than that of the fundamental harmonic. As the harmonic index increases, the power level will decrease accordingly. In addition, due to the symmetry of the STC scheme, it is recognized that there also exists symmetry of positive order harmonic and the corresponding negative order harmonic, i.e., q = 1 and q = −1. Nevertheless, the presented simple STC scheme suffices to demonstrate the CI system based on harmonics utilization.

A 12 × 12 TMS prototype was fabricated and experimentally examined. As shown in Fig. 4(a), we present the front view (receiving layer) and back view (transmitting layer). The aperture size of TMS is 150 by 100 mm, containing 12 × 12 programmable meta-atoms and 12 sockets for biasing. The 12 biasing sockets representing the 12 coding blocks are connected to an field-programmable gate array (FPGA) control board for independent time modulation of each block. We mention that all the biasing lines are tuned to an identical length for time synchronization. The transmission magnitudes of the fabricated 12 × 12 TMS in all τ0 and all τ1 states were measured and simulated, as shown in Fig. 4(b). The model for both measurement and simulation is also depicted as an inset in Fig. 4(b). The results are obtained from the |S21| of the two horn antennas. Note that before measuring all τ0 and all τ1 states of the fabricated TMS, we measured the |S21| without the TMS for calibration. As can be observed from the results, the fabricated TMS shows good performance in modulating the transmission amplitude, which agrees well with the simulated ones from 20 to 23 GHz. However, there exists disagreement between 19 and 20 GHz, which may be explained by the fabrication errors. Nevertheless, because our CI system only works at 21 GHz, the disagreement between 19 and 20 GHz would not affect the results of imaging reconstruction.

FIG. 4.

(a) Front view (receiving layer) and back view (transmitting layer) of the fabricated 12 × 12 TMS. (b) Comparison of simulated and measured transmission magnitudes for all τ1 and all τ0 states of the fabricated TMS. Measurement configuration is illustrated as an inset.

FIG. 4.

(a) Front view (receiving layer) and back view (transmitting layer) of the fabricated 12 × 12 TMS. (b) Comparison of simulated and measured transmission magnitudes for all τ1 and all τ0 states of the fabricated TMS. Measurement configuration is illustrated as an inset.

Close modal

In Fig. 5, we compare the calculated, simulated, and measured near-field distributions on the inspected plane at 21 GHz for four different space coding according to the proposed STC scheme. The distance parameters are D′ = 38 mm and D = 150 mm. The inspected plane is 300 × 300 mm2. From the results, it is observed that the calculated normalized patterns are in accordance with the simulated and measured ones, demonstrating the effectiveness of the adopted method. Note that the simulated |Ey| patterns were analyzed by the Ansys Electronics Desktop. The measured |Ey| results were obtained in an anechoic chamber with the same configuration for simulations and calculations. We also mention that existing full-wave simulation tools cannot analyze an STC metasurface, which requires a time-varying boundary condition; therefore, only the space coding results are compared. Nonetheless, the reported comparisons provide the prerequisite for the TMS-based CI system utilizing harmonics.

FIG. 5.

Normalized near-field distributions on the inspected plane at 21 GHz for four different space coding (first column) by calculation (second column), simulation (third column), and measurement (fourth column).

FIG. 5.

Normalized near-field distributions on the inspected plane at 21 GHz for four different space coding (first column) by calculation (second column), simulation (third column), and measurement (fourth column).

Close modal

Having the above description, we show how to build the sensing matrix H using randomly distributed harmonics. We suppose that there exist G × K equal spacing pixels, total L randomly distributed space coding, and total Q harmonics for each space coding. Therefore, each equation in Eq. (1) can be expressed as

(6)

where fgk is the transmissive coefficient of the object to be imaged and hgk is proportional to Egkq·EgkRx, where EgkRx is the Rx field at each pixel. Putting the available harmonics together, the complete expression of Eq. (1) is

(7)

Since the sensing matrix has been obtained, we further conduct the imaging reconstruction experiments.

In Fig. 6, we show the experimental configuration of the CI system utilizing harmonics generated by the STC TMS. The distances of the parallel planes are D′ = 38 mm and D = 150 mm. The Tx is connected to a signal generator, and the Rx is connected to a spectrum analyzer. The power level of the single-tone signal at 21 GHz was amplified and calibrated to 30 dBm. A thin foam with relative permittivity near unity was applied to support the metallic objects on the inspected plane. The inspected plane is 300 × 300 mm2, which is pixelated by 26 × 26, i.e., G = K = 26. Note that a single-pixel spans about 0.8λ0 × 0.8λ0, where λ0 is the wavelength at 21 GHz. Two separated metallic objects spanning 2 × 2 pixels were made by copper foil sheet and glued to the supporting foam. The TMS is modulated by an in-house designed FPGA control board whose modulation time could achieve 1 μs for each output channel independently. In this work, we set the period T = 12 μs; therefore, each coding block flips its coding state in 1 μs duration time while keeping its coding state in the other 11 μs duration time. The CI system is surrounded by microwave-absorbing materials to reduce the multipath reflections.

FIG. 6.

Configuration of the CI system utilizing harmonics. The Tx is connected to a signal generator, which generates a monochromatic signal at 21 GHz. The fabricated TMS is regulated by an in-house designed FPGA control board. The Rx is connected to a spectrum analyzer to acquire the harmonics.

FIG. 6.

Configuration of the CI system utilizing harmonics. The Tx is connected to a signal generator, which generates a monochromatic signal at 21 GHz. The fabricated TMS is regulated by an in-house designed FPGA control board. The Rx is connected to a spectrum analyzer to acquire the harmonics.

Close modal

Considering the total 676 pixels to be imaged, we use L = 50 groups of randomly distributed space coding combined with Q = 9 near-field harmonics, whose harmonic indexes range from 0 to 8. The sparse sampling ratio is about LQ/GK = 0.66. The reflectivity of the target objects to be imaged is plotted in Fig. 7(a). The adopted 50 groups of space coding were generated and programmed to the FPGA, which sequentially flips the coding state of each coding block as the proposed STC scheme. We observed and recorded the power levels of the received spectrum from the spectrum analyzer. The power levels of the 450 groups for image reconstruction are plotted in Fig. 7(b). Power levels of higher harmonics greater (q ⩾ 9) are quite low and, therefore, are dropped. Because we could only measure the phaseless or intensity-only data, we apply the sparse Wirtinger Flow reconstruction algorithm, which has been used to realize phaseless CI in the microwave domain44 and optical domain.45 Because the unknowns in Eq. (7) are transmissive coefficients, the power levels without the objects were also measured to convert the transmissive results into reflective results, which had been applied in Ref. 46. The reconstructed results are reported in Fig. 7(c). As can be seen, we reconstruct the desired objects with good amplitudes compared with the background at the correct positions.

FIG. 7.

Experimental results of the CI system. (a) The objects to be imaged. (b) Measured power of the adopted 450 harmonics. (c) Reconstructed results by 450 groups of phaseless (intensity-only) data. (d) Reconstructed results by 50 groups of complex data using the same space coding.

FIG. 7.

Experimental results of the CI system. (a) The objects to be imaged. (b) Measured power of the adopted 450 harmonics. (c) Reconstructed results by 450 groups of phaseless (intensity-only) data. (d) Reconstructed results by 50 groups of complex data using the same space coding.

Close modal

The proposed TMS can also operate without space–time modulation; thus, frequency domain measurements through a vector network analyzer were conducted using the same 50 groups' space coding. We emphasize that such measurements could obtain complex data, including amplitude and phase information. The reconstructed imaging using the complex data is shown in Fig. 7(d). From the results, the objects can be recognized; however, the quality is poor due to the limited sampling modes. The mean square errors of the results of phaseless signals and complex signals compared with the ideal results are 0.0145 and 0.0453. The comparison proves that by utilizing the near-field harmonics, we can increase the imaging quality with fewer space-coding patterns.

In summary, we have presented the utilization of harmonics in the phaseless near-field CI system based on an STC TMS. The amplitude modulation programmable metasurface is designed in detail. An STC scheme that is simple and effective to launch randomly distributed sensing harmonics is proposed and validated. This study has identified the effectiveness of employing harmonic spectra in a CI system. The insights gained from this study may be of assistance to developing novel imagers in the microwave domain. A further study should focus on a more efficient STC scheme that generates equivalent intensity harmonics for higher mode utilization.

This work was supported by the National Key Research and Development Program of China under Grant No. 2021YFA1401001, the National Natural Science Foundation of China under Grant Nos. 62288101 and 62001342, Key Research and Development Program of Shaanxi under Grant No. 2021TD-07, the Joint Foundation of Key Laboratory of Shanghai Jiao Tong University-Xidian University, Ministry of Education under Grant No. LHJJ/2020-02, and the China Postdoctoral Science Foundation under Grant No. 2021M692496.

The authors have no conflicts to disclose.

Jiaqi Han: Data curation (equal); Investigation (equal); Methodology (equal); Writing – original draft (equal). Tong Wang: Investigation (equal); Methodology (equal). Silong Chen: Formal analysis (equal); Validation (equal). Xiangjin Ma: Methodology (equal); Validation (equal). Guanxuan Li: Data curation (equal); Software (equal). Haixia Liu: Funding acquisition (equal); Project administration (equal); Writing – review & editing (equal). Long Li: Conceptualization (equal); Methodology (equal); Supervision (equal); Writing – review & editing (equal).

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

1.
D.
Sheen
,
D.
McMakin
, and
T.
Hall
,
IEEE Trans. Microwave Theory Tech.
49
,
1581
(
2001
).
2.
J.
Lopez-Sanchez
and
J.
Fortuny-Guasch
,
IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag.
48
,
728
(
2000
).
3.
X.
Zhuge
and
A. G.
Yarovoy
,
IEEE Trans. Image Process.
21
,
3026
(
2012
).
4.
L.
Ding
,
S.
Wu
,
P.
Li
, and
Y.
Zhu
,
IEEE Sens. J.
19
,
6721
(
2019
).
5.
K.
Tan
,
X.
Chen
,
S.
Wu
, and
G.
Fang
,
IEEE Trans. Microwave Theory Tech.
68
,
3885
(
2020
).
6.
Y.
Meng
,
C.
Lin
,
J.
Zang
,
A.
Qing
, and
N. K.
Nikolova
,
IEEE Trans. Microwave Theory Tech.
68
,
4694
(
2020
).
7.
Y.
Meng
,
C.
Lin
,
A.
Qing
, and
N. K.
Nikolova
,
IEEE Trans. Microwave Theory Tech.
70
,
1630
(
2022
).
8.
J. N.
Mait
,
D. A.
Wikner
,
M. S.
Mirotznik
,
J.
van der Gracht
,
G. P.
Behrmann
,
B. L.
Good
, and
S. A.
Mathews
,
IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag.
57
,
1713
(
2009
).
9.
S.
Mukerjee
,
J.
Doroshewitz
,
J. M.
Merlo
,
C.
Oakley
,
L.
Udpa
,
D.
MacFarlane
,
E.
Huff
, and
J. A.
Nanzer
,
IEEE J. Microwaves
2
,
614
(
2022
).
10.
S.
Vakalis
,
L.
Gong
,
Y.
He
,
J.
Papapolymerou
, and
J. A.
Nanzer
,
IEEE Trans. Microwave Theory Tech.
68
,
3804
(
2020
).
11.
V. M.
Patel
,
J. N.
Mait
,
D. W.
Prather
, and
A. S.
Hedden
,
IEEE Signal Process. Mag.
33
,
109
(
2016
).
12.
J.
Helander
,
A.
Ericsson
,
M.
Gustafsson
,
T.
Martin
,
D.
Sjöberg
, and
C.
Larsson
,
IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag.
65
,
5523
(
2017
).
13.
S.
Li
,
G.
Zhao
,
H.
Sun
, and
M.
Amin
,
IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag.
66
,
7295
(
2018
).
14.
S. S.
Ahmed
,
A.
Schiessl
,
F.
Gumbmann
,
M.
Tiebout
,
S.
Methfessel
, and
L.-P.
Schmidt
,
IEEE Microwave Mag.
13
,
26
(
2012
).
15.
W.
Shao
and
Q.
Chen
, “Single-pixel scanning near-field imaging with subwavelength resolution using sharp focusing Mikaelian lens,”
IEEE Trans. Microwave Theory Tech.
(published online,
2022
).
16.
M. F.
Duarte
,
M. A.
Davenport
,
D.
Takhar
,
J. N.
Laska
,
T.
Sun
,
K. F.
Kelly
, and
R. G.
Baraniuk
,
IEEE Signal Process. Mag.
25
,
83
(
2008
).
17.
W. L.
Chan
,
K.
Charan
,
D.
Takhar
,
K. F.
Kelly
,
R. G.
Baraniuk
, and
D. M.
Mittleman
,
Appl. Phys. Lett.
93
,
121105
(
2008
).
18.
J.
Hunt
,
T.
Driscoll
,
A.
Mrozack
,
G.
Lipworth
,
M.
Reynolds
,
D.
Brady
, and
D. R.
Smith
,
Science
339
,
310
(
2013
).
19.
M. F.
Imani
,
J. N.
Gollub
,
O.
Yurduseven
,
A. V.
Diebold
,
M.
Boyarsky
,
T.
Fromenteze
,
L.
PulidoMancera
,
T.
Sleasman
, and
D. R.
Smith
,
IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag.
68
,
1860
(
2020
).
20.
J.
Han
,
L.
Li
,
S.
Tian
,
X.
Ma
,
Q.
Feng
,
H.
Liu
,
Y.
Zhao
, and
G.
Liao
,
Front. Mater.
8
,
766889
(
2021
).
21.
M.
Zhao
,
S.
Zhu
,
H.
Huang
,
D.
Hu
,
X.
Chen
,
J.
Chen
, and
A.
Zhang
,
IEEE Antennas Wireless Propag. Lett.
20
,
1274
(
2021
).
22.
T.
Sleasman
,
M. F.
Imani
,
A. V.
Diebold
,
M.
Boyarsky
,
K. P.
Trofatter
, and
D. R.
Smith
,
IEEE Antennas Propag. Mag.
64
,
123
(
2022
).
23.
T.
Sleasman
,
M. F.
Imani
,
J. N.
Gollub
, and
D. R.
Smith
,
Appl. Phys. Lett.
107
,
204104
(
2015
).
24.
J.
Han
,
L.
Li
,
S.
Tian
,
G.
Liu
,
H.
Liu
, and
Y.
Shi
,
IEEE J. Emerging Sel. Top. Circuits Syst.
10
,
52
(
2020
).
25.
A. V.
Diebold
,
M. F.
Imani
,
T.
Sleasman
, and
D. R.
Smith
,
Optica
5
,
1529
(
2018
).
26.
A. V.
Diebold
,
M. F.
Imani
,
T.
Sleasman
, and
D. R.
Smith
,
Appl. Opt.
57
,
2142
(
2018
).
27.
S.
Taravati
and
G. V.
Eleftheriades
,
ACS Photonics
9
,
305
(
2022
).
28.
L.
Zhang
,
X. Q.
Chen
,
S.
Liu
,
Q.
Zhang
,
J.
Zhao
,
J. Y.
Dai
,
G. D.
Bai
,
X.
Wan
,
Q.
Cheng
,
G.
Castaldi
,
V.
Galdi
, and
T. J.
Cui
,
Nat. Commun.
9
,
4334
(
2018
).
29.
Q.
Cheng
,
L.
Zhang
,
J. Y.
Dai
,
W.
Tang
,
J. C.
Ke
,
S.
Liu
,
J. C.
Liang
,
S.
Jin
, and
T. J.
Cui
,
Proc. IEEE
110
,
1266
(
2022
).
30.
L.
Zhang
,
M. Z.
Chen
,
W.
Tang
,
J. Y.
Dai
,
L.
Miao
,
X. Y.
Zhou
,
S.
Jin
,
Q.
Cheng
, and
T. J.
Cui
,
Nat. Electron.
4
,
218
(
2021
).
31.
J. C.
Ke
,
J. Y.
Dai
,
J. W.
Zhang
,
Z.
Chen
,
M. Z.
Chen
,
Y.
Lu
,
L.
Zhang
,
L.
Wang
,
Q. Y.
Zhou
,
L.
Li
,
J. S.
Ding
,
Q.
Cheng
, and
T. J.
Cui
,
Light: Sci. Appl.
11
,
273
(
2022
).
32.
A.
Shaltout
,
A.
Kildishev
, and
V.
Shalaev
,
Opt. Mater. Express
5
,
2459
(
2015
).
33.
X.
Wang
,
J.
Han
,
S.
Tian
,
D.
Xia
,
L.
Li
, and
T. J.
Cui
,
Adv. Sci.
9
,
2105960
(
2022
).
34.
X.
Wang
and
C.
Caloz
,
IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag.
69
,
286
(
2021
).
35.
M.
Liu
,
A. B.
Kozyrev
, and
I. V.
Shadrivov
,
Phys. Rev. Appl.
12
,
054052
(
2019
).
36.
S.
Ghasemi
,
H.
Rajabalipanah
,
M.
Tayarani
,
A.
Abdolali
, and
M.
Baharian
,
Adv. Opt. Mater.
9
,
2001594
(
2021
).
37.
T. J.
Cui
,
M. Q.
Qi
,
X.
Wan
,
J.
Zhao
, and
Q.
Cheng
,
Light: Sci. Appl.
3
,
e218
(
2014
).
38.
J.
Han
,
L.
Li
,
X.
Ma
,
X.
Gao
,
Y.
Mu
,
G.
Liao
,
Z. J.
Luo
, and
T. J.
Cui
,
IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron.
69
,
8524
(
2022
).
39.
W. H.
Gao
,
M.
Chen
,
Q.
Cheng
,
R. W.
Shao
,
J. C.
Liang
,
Y.
Gao
, and
T. J.
Cui
,
New J. Phys.
23
,
065006
(
2021
).
40.
X.
Bai
,
F.
Zhang
,
L.
Sun
,
A.
Cao
,
J.
Zhang
,
C.
He
,
L.
Liu
,
J.
Yao
, and
W.
Zhu
,
Research
2022
, 9825903.
41.
A.
Clemente
,
L.
Dussopt
,
R.
Sauleau
,
P.
Potier
, and
P.
Pouliguen
,
IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag.
61
,
5017
(
2013
).
42.
A.
Clemente
,
L.
Dussopt
,
R.
Sauleau
,
P.
Potier
, and
P.
Pouliguen
,
IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag.
60
,
2260
(
2012
).
43.
J.
Goodman
,
Introduction to Fourier Optics
(
W.H. Freeman
,
2017
).
44.
O.
Yurduseven
,
T.
Fromenteze
,
D. L.
Marks
,
J. N.
Gollub
, and
D. R.
Smith
,
IEEE Antennas Wireless Propag. Lett.
16
,
2738
(
2017
).
45.
L.
Bian
,
J.
Suo
,
G.
Zheng
,
K.
Guo
,
F.
Chen
, and
Q.
Dai
,
Opt. Express
23
,
4856
(
2015
).
46.
R. K.
Amineh
,
M.
Ravan
,
A.
Khalatpour
, and
N. K.
Nikolova
,
IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag.
59
,
4777
(
2011
).