Learning and pattern recognition inevitably requires memory of previous events, a feature that conventional CMOS hardware needs to artificially simulate. Dynamical systems naturally provide the memory, complexity, and nonlinearity needed for a plethora of different unconventional computing approaches. In this perspective article, we focus on the unconventional computing concept of reservoir computing and provide an overview of key physical reservoir works reported. We focus on the promising platform of magnetic structures and, in particular, skyrmions, which potentially allow for low-power applications. Moreover, we discuss skyrmion-based implementations of Brownian computing, which has recently been combined with reservoir computing. This computing paradigm leverages the thermal fluctuations present in many skyrmion systems. Finally, we provide an outlook on the most important challenges in this field.

Modern-day applications of artificial intelligence (AI) have become pervasive in many aspects of our daily lives, and their importance is only predicted to increase. Artificial neural networks (ANNs), computational models inspired by the biological neural network architecture of the human brain, are primarily responsible for the rapid advancement of AI research.1,2 A class of ANN known as the recurrent neural network (RNN)3 excels at processing sequential or time series data. RNNs are distinguished by their “memory,” which incorporates data from previous inputs to process a specific element of an input sequence.

Reservoir computing (RC) is a general and universal computational framework4 derived from RNNs. Its foundations can be traced back to two independently developed RNN-based models, echo-state networks by Jaeger5 and liquid-state machines by Maass et al.6 RC consists of two main components: a fixed, randomly initialized nonlinear RNN system called the “reservoir” and a trainable readout layer. The reservoir, characterized by its recurrency and fading memory properties, acts as a high-dimensional, nonlinear projection of the input data, efficiently capturing the temporal information and inherent dynamics of the system. Recurrency in the reservoir enables it to maintain a continuous internal state, while the fading memory property ensures that more recent inputs have a higher impact on the reservoir states than older ones, allowing for efficient short-term memory. The higher dimensional mapping of inputs enables spatiotemporal feature selection to be performed at the readout nodes using relatively simple methods such as regression algorithms (e.g., linear, ridge, and logistic regression). In contrast to conventional ANNs, which call for fine-tuning a plethora of interconnected node weights across multiple layers, the internal weights of the reservoir and the input nodes remain fixed, and only the weights of the readout nodes need to be trained. This significantly reduces the computational cost of learning, especially when compared to other RNNs.7  Figure 1 schematically depicts a summary of the concept of reservoir computing. Here, the nonlinear reservoir is exemplified by a skyrmion fabric system.8–11 

FIG. 1.

Illustration of the reservoir computing framework taking the classification of a sequence of multicolored assorted shapes as an example. (a) An arbitrary temporal input signal (colorful shape sequence) excites the (b) reservoir, embodied in this illustration by a physical system made up of (c) magnetic skyrmions, which then (d) projects the input data into a linearly separable higher dimensional space in which hyperplanes can be used to (e) classify different desired features (shape or color) by only training the output readout. Moreover, the input-excited reservoir projection also enables other inference tasks, such as (f) time series prediction.

FIG. 1.

Illustration of the reservoir computing framework taking the classification of a sequence of multicolored assorted shapes as an example. (a) An arbitrary temporal input signal (colorful shape sequence) excites the (b) reservoir, embodied in this illustration by a physical system made up of (c) magnetic skyrmions, which then (d) projects the input data into a linearly separable higher dimensional space in which hyperplanes can be used to (e) classify different desired features (shape or color) by only training the output readout. Moreover, the input-excited reservoir projection also enables other inference tasks, such as (f) time series prediction.

Close modal

For RC systems to work effectively, some crucial requirements need to be met: The reservoir needs to have high complexity. This complexity entails an intricate interplay of connectivity, dynamics, dimensionality, adaptivity, and nonlinearity. The reservoir's interconnected recurrent units exhibit rich and diverse interactions, while the system's dynamics capture complex input patterns. The number of its effective degrees of freedom must be larger than the dimensionality of the input. High dimensionality enhances learning and generalization, while adaptivity allows the system to evolve during the learning process. Intrinsic nonlinearities enable the representation and processing of complex, nonlinear relationships in input data, making reservoir computing systems capable of handling sophisticated temporal and spatial data. Another necessary characteristic is that the reservoir's internal state needs to be influenced by recent inputs while remaining unaffected by inputs from the distant past. This quality is referred to as fading/short-term memory.12,13 The extent of this fading memory has a profound effect on the information processing capacity of the reservoir.13,14 Fading memory is what makes RC well-suited for processing temporal data with transient dependencies,6 such as stochastic or chaotic time series prediction.15,16 Additionally, a reservoir needs to possess the ability to respond to a given input uniquely. More concretely, the reservoir should distinctly map the temporal history of a given input to a specific internal state. This is termed the echo state property.5,17,18 Formally, a reservoir is said to possess the echo state property if, for any input sequence u(n) with time step n, the reservoir states x(n) it generates satisfy the condition: For all n > n0, where n0 is the initial step, and for any pair of initial reservoir states x(0) and x′(0), the difference between the corresponding reservoir states x(n) and x′(n) vanishes as n approaches infinity, i.e., limn→∞|x(n) − x′(n)| → 0.

Although RC does not train the internal weights of the reservoir, it is still often possible to optimize reservoir performance by tuning hyperparameters. For systems with many possible parameter choices, task-agnostic metrics help in identifying excellent hyperparameters.19,20 Some reservoir systems exhibit dynamics that transition between non-chaotic and chaotic regimes upon adjustment of their intrinsic parameters. Occasionally, such reservoirs can be optimized by adjusting them to operate at the so-called “edge of chaos”—a critical phase transition point beyond which the reservoir system's dynamics become chaotic.21,22 While this approach can be effective in designing reservoirs with chaotic tendencies, it is not universally applicable, and there have been exceptions to this hypothesis.23–25 For this reason, it is imperative to understand the dynamical trends of a chosen reservoir system.

A branch of RC called physical RC (PRC) has emerged, in which physical systems are used as reservoirs.26–29 Physical systems often naturally fulfill the RC criteria of being complex, nonlinear, and possessing a short-term memory. It is crucial to note that for physical reservoirs, consistent reproducibility is an additional essential prerequisite, ensuring outcomes can be replicated under similar conditions. Reproducibility also entails that the reservoir is robust against noisy fluctuations and other internal transient dynamics that do not promote the nonlinear transformation of inputs but persist even after input signals are removed. A PRC measure of fading memory needs to include these fleeting dynamics as they have been shown to support short-term memory.13,30,31

In this Perspective, we describe reservoirs epitomized by skyrmions, such as the skyrmion fabric system shown in Fig. 1. Magnetic skyrmions are localized magnetic whirls possessing particle-like properties. Skyrmions were proposed by Tony Skyrme in 1961 in a model describing elementary particles.32 The magnetic versions studied nowadays were theoretically predicted in 198933 and experimentally observed in 2009.34 Since then, they have been shown to occur in many magnetic systems ranging from insulators to metals at various temperatures, even above room temperature.35–41 Furthermore, skyrmions have been observed as singular objects,42–45 clusters,46,47 skyrmion lattices34,48,49 and in the form of intermediate skyrmion phases known as skyrmion fabrics [Fig. 1(b)].50 An example of a single skyrmion is illustrated in Fig. 1(c).

Skyrmions have a non-trivial topology, which implies that a topological invariant can be associated with them, quantified by the topological index as follows:
(1)
where M is the magnetization unit vector, and the integral is taken over a two-dimensional space. Q = ±1 for skyrmions in particular. Topology has a profound effect on the physics of skyrmions and influences phenomena, such as transport51 and thermal52–55 motion. Topology massively increases the skyrmion's robustness against structural defects and impurities.56 Topological properties can be exploited to build stable reservoir systems.8,9

Magnetic spin textures, such as skyrmions, originate from the interplay of different competing energy contributions within a given system.37 Typically, there is at least one energy term that favors a uniform ferromagnetic configuration of magnetic moments, e.g., exchange or anisotropy, and there are other terms that promote twisted configurations, e.g., Dzyaloshinskii–Moriya interaction (DMI) and demagnetization.36 In magnetic materials with broken inversion symmetry, such as uniaxial non-centrosymmetric ferromagnets,57 cubic helimagnets,58 and thin film heterostructure systems with structural inversion asymmetry,36 DMI effects59 become pronounced. The aforementioned thermally activated dynamics also enable skyrmion-based Brownian computing (BC) approaches,53,60–64 as discussed in Sec. III.

Skyrmion dynamics can be manipulated by spin torques,51,65–67 magnetic fields,68–70 electric fields,71–73 magnons,74–76 temperature gradients,77,78 and thermal fluctuations.79–81 Through such mechanisms, it is possible to reliably control the creation (writing),82 detection (reading),82 rotation83,84 and even annihilation (deleting)82 of magnetic skyrmions. These qualities, along with topological stability, small size,85,86 maneuverability around material defects,87 and ultralow power operation51,65 pave the way for magnetic skyrmions to be used in applications, such as skyrmion-based racetrack memories,88,89 logic devices,90,91 magnetic tunnel junctions (MTJs),92,93 nano-oscillators,94,95 and unconventional computing schemes64,96–98 like neuromorphic,99 probabilistic,53,100 and reservoir computing.8,60,101

Systems from diverse disciplines have demonstrated their capabilities of constructing a physical reservoir,26–29 including bioelectronics,102–105 electronics,29,106–109 magnonics,101,110–112 memristors,113–116 nanomagnets,117–122 photonics,123–129 and spintronics,60,96–98,109,130–133 summarized in Table I. This yields an advantage from an application standpoint as different reservoirs could be designed pertinent to a specific application considering their available inputs and readout mechanisms.134 

TABLE I.

Examples of experimental and general skyrmion reservoir systems. Note that the “Timescale” column indicates the system's intrinsic timescales, while the operation speeds may be limited by their measurement and control schemes. See the main text for abbreviations.

Reference Discipline Reservoir Input Output Readout Timescales Demonstration
Experimental physical reservoir systems 
103   Bioelectronics  mBNN  Photostimulations  Evoked activity  Fluorescent calcium imaging  ∼s  Spoken digit recognition 
102   Bioelectronics  OECT  Voltage waveforms  Voltage  Analog DAQ system  ∼s  Heartbeat classification 
106   Electronics  FeFET  Voltage waveforms  Current  Terminal currents  ns ∼ μ Temporal-XOR and parity-check 
114   Memristors  DM  Voltage pulses  Current  RRAM  μ Arrhythmia detection and gesture recognition 
113   Memristors  NW networks  Voltage pulses  Voltage  RRAM  μ Handwritten digit classification 
122   Nanomagnets  Nanorings  Rotating magnetic fields  AMR response  Electrical contacts  ns ∼ μ Signal transformation and Spoken digit recognition 
120 and 121   Nanomagnets  ASVI  Magnetic field waveforms  Spinwave spectra  FMR  ∼ns  Signal transformation and forecasting 
130   Spintronics  STNO  Voltage waveforms  Voltage  Diode rectification  μ Spoken-digit recognition 
Skyrmion-based physical reservoir systems (*experimental works) 
101   Magnonics*  Chiral magnet  Magnetic field waveforms  Spinwave spectra  FMR  ∼ns  Signal transformation and forecasting 
60   Spintronics*  Confined skyrmions  Voltage pulses  Skyrmion displacement  Kerr microscopy/electrical contacts  ns ∼ ms  Boolean logic operations 
133   Spintronics*  Hall bars  Magnetic fields  Anomalous Hall voltage  Electrical contacts  ns ∼ μ Waveform and handwritten digit recognition 
8–11   Spintronics  Skyrmion fabrics  Voltage waveforms  AMR response, local magnetization  Spatially resolved magnetization  ∼ns  Temporal pattern recognition, spoken digit recognition 
135   Spintronics  Thin plate  Microwave pulses  Magnetization oscillations  Oscillation detectors  ns ∼ μ Short-term memory and parity-check 
136   Spintronics  MSM  Current pulses  Skyrmion position  Mathematical function  ∼ns  Handwritten digit classification 
137   Straintronics  Thin film  Voltage-induced strains  Time-resolved magnetization  MTJ  ∼ns  Short-term memory and parity-check 
Reference Discipline Reservoir Input Output Readout Timescales Demonstration
Experimental physical reservoir systems 
103   Bioelectronics  mBNN  Photostimulations  Evoked activity  Fluorescent calcium imaging  ∼s  Spoken digit recognition 
102   Bioelectronics  OECT  Voltage waveforms  Voltage  Analog DAQ system  ∼s  Heartbeat classification 
106   Electronics  FeFET  Voltage waveforms  Current  Terminal currents  ns ∼ μ Temporal-XOR and parity-check 
114   Memristors  DM  Voltage pulses  Current  RRAM  μ Arrhythmia detection and gesture recognition 
113   Memristors  NW networks  Voltage pulses  Voltage  RRAM  μ Handwritten digit classification 
122   Nanomagnets  Nanorings  Rotating magnetic fields  AMR response  Electrical contacts  ns ∼ μ Signal transformation and Spoken digit recognition 
120 and 121   Nanomagnets  ASVI  Magnetic field waveforms  Spinwave spectra  FMR  ∼ns  Signal transformation and forecasting 
130   Spintronics  STNO  Voltage waveforms  Voltage  Diode rectification  μ Spoken-digit recognition 
Skyrmion-based physical reservoir systems (*experimental works) 
101   Magnonics*  Chiral magnet  Magnetic field waveforms  Spinwave spectra  FMR  ∼ns  Signal transformation and forecasting 
60   Spintronics*  Confined skyrmions  Voltage pulses  Skyrmion displacement  Kerr microscopy/electrical contacts  ns ∼ ms  Boolean logic operations 
133   Spintronics*  Hall bars  Magnetic fields  Anomalous Hall voltage  Electrical contacts  ns ∼ μ Waveform and handwritten digit recognition 
8–11   Spintronics  Skyrmion fabrics  Voltage waveforms  AMR response, local magnetization  Spatially resolved magnetization  ∼ns  Temporal pattern recognition, spoken digit recognition 
135   Spintronics  Thin plate  Microwave pulses  Magnetization oscillations  Oscillation detectors  ns ∼ μ Short-term memory and parity-check 
136   Spintronics  MSM  Current pulses  Skyrmion position  Mathematical function  ∼ns  Handwritten digit classification 
137   Straintronics  Thin film  Voltage-induced strains  Time-resolved magnetization  MTJ  ∼ns  Short-term memory and parity-check 

In bioelectronic systems, information is processed using biocompatible materials or organic biological architectures in conjunction with electronic sensors. While many approaches primarily focus on clinical applications, their use for neuromorphic computation has begun gaining interest.138–140 A study by Sumi et al.103 has demonstrated RC on a micropatterned biological neuronal network (mBNN). Here, the input data were transformed to frequency-dependent photostimulation to create the reservoir using optogenetic techniques supplied to rat cortical neurons grown on micropatterned substrates. The readout mechanism incorporated measurements by fluorescent imaging via calcium probes (20 frames/second), where the spontaneous and evoked activities of mBNN were trained to demonstrate spatial pattern and spoken digit recognition tasks. The performance of mBNN reservoirs are typically bound to its timescales of short-term memory capacity, which ranges from tens of milliseconds to a few seconds.103,141,142 While it may not be suitable for high-speed electronic applications, it may be applicable in specific cases where biological timescales share similar orders.103,143 On the other hand, organic electrochemical transistors (OECTs) have also sparked promises for RC.104,134 Using data-encoded voltage waveforms as inputs and analogue readings of output time-variant voltages, examples of nonlinear signal and heartbeat classification have been shown.102,105

Diverse electronic systems, including analogue circuits, FPGAs, memristors, and ferroelectrics, highlight their potential for RC.29,108,109 Such systems have flexible scalability and pose a benefit of circuit-level implementation, compatible with silicon-based CMOS technologies at low power. In particular, memristive technologies have continued to proliferate for their role in neuromorphic computation and RC.115,116 Diverse architectural designs have been proposed, and detailed studies have investigated fundamental properties in building or improving the system efficiency/performance of the reservoirs. Numerous experiments have explored various design paradigms that take a step closer to device-level implementations of RC. For example, a recent work by Milano et al.113 uses self-organized nanowire (NW) networks with a memristive architecture as a reservoir. After inputting a sequence of voltage pulses that encodes the data, it utilizes resistive random access memory (RRAM) as a readout mechanism to convert the output voltages from the NW networks to a matrix of currents that could be trained. In this study, handwritten digit recognition and signal forecasting have been demonstrated. Similarly, a fully analogue RC114 involving nonvolatile memristor arrays used as RRAM in the readout layer with data-translated input voltage pulses to dynamical memristors (DMs) was shown to allow the detection of arrhythmia and dynamic hand gesture recognition. The study reports that the power consumption of such a system comprising 24 DMs is 22.2 μW.

Among silicon-compatible systems, ferroelectric field-effect transistors (FeFETs) have been realized as an alternative approach in designing future electronic components for in-memory144 and neuromorphic computation.145–147 As a multi-terminal device, while FeFETs share similar nature with standard field-effect transistors, it uses ferroelectric materials for the gate insulator. Its nonlinearity stems from the time-dependent polarization reversal process on the input gate voltage. Harnessing this property allows the output currents to exhibit history-dependent and nonlinear dynamics adequate for RC.106 On this note, by measuring the drain, source, and substrate currents from a data-mapped voltage waveform input, Toprasertpong et al.106 have performed RC on a HfO2-based FeFET to compute logic-based tasks, including temporal-XOR and parity-checks. While FeFETs are one example, semiconductor electronics provide additional room for increasing the fabrication complexity with innovative engineering solutions and may lead to large-scale integration.148 

Spintronic and magnonic systems have also highlighted advantages as a physical platform for RC.96,98,149,150 Works by Torrejon et al.130 demonstrated PRC using a network of spin-torque nano oscillators (STNOs) made from magnetic tunnel junctions (MTJs) for spoken digit (pattern) recognition, with an accuracy of up to 99.6% and nonlinear waveform classification tasks. The data-mapped voltages were input as currents into the STNOs, and the output response of rectified time-dependent voltages was recorded to construct a reservoir. Subsequently, the work has sparked interest in further developments of PRC with STNOs and MTJs.131,136,151–155 Diverse nanomagnetic systems, including the use of their magnetic dipole-coupling interactions, surface acoustic waves, artificial spin-vortex ice (ASVI), and nanoring arrays, have also proposed and shown promising PRC performances by exploiting their high-dimensionalities and rich nonlinear dynamics.117–122,156 For example, Gartside et al.120 utilized nanomagnetic arrays by applying magnetic field inputs and measuring the nonlinear nucleation dynamics of spinwave spectra using ferromagnetic resonance (FMR). Dawidek et al.118 proposed PRC by manipulating the domain wall (DW) population in the nanoring arrays by rotating the applied magnetic fields. It was later experimentally demonstrated by Vidamour et al.122 through transport measurements collecting anisotropic magnetoresistance (AMR) signals associated with the annihilation and repopulation of the DWs in the nanorings. Furthermore, complex magnetic structures inherently provide all the important components of a reservoir without creating a system of interconnected neurons: complexity, nonlinearity, and short-term memory.

On the other hand, various skyrmion-based PRC systems have been proposed8–11,135–137 and experimentally demonstrated.60,101,133 These systems may offer particular advantages, including speed, energy efficiency, task adaptability, and scalability, as high-speed (∼nanosecond timescales) and low-power (∼microwatt or less) alternatives to existing PRC schemes.8–10,60 In particular, rich controllability of material parameters can lead to performance improvements by adjusting the system's reservoir properties and reconfiguring its nonlinearity and memory capacity.9,10,20,101 For example, an experimental demonstration by Lee et al.101 has shown that adding skyrmions to conical/ferromagnetic magnetic phase-reservoirs can enhance memory in the system and improve forecasting tasks by an order of magnitude. Raab et al.60 highlighted the potential for device down-scaling by exploiting current-induced spin–orbit torques to manipulate skyrmions and using tunnel magnetoresistance (TMR) to detect the presence of skyrmions in skyrmion-based RCs. Yokouchi et al.133 utilized magnetic field-induced skyrmion dynamics in Hall bar arrangements and showed promising handwritten digit recognition tasks with anomalous Hall voltage measurements.

Further theoretically proposed RC schemes predict promising results. Spintronic RCs include the voltage-dependent skyrmion positions in a magnetic skyrmion memristor (MSM),136 exploiting the resistance or magnetization changes in skyrmion fabrics8–11 and measuring the spinwave propagations in a thin plate magnet hosting skyrmions.135 A straintronic skyrmion-based PRC system proposes utilizing nonlinear breathing dynamics of skyrmions via voltage-induced strain in an MTJ block.137 Therefore, given appropriate material choices and advancements in device engineering, such properties of magnetic skyrmions could be maneuvered for competitive performance in unconventional computing schemes. Nevertheless, addressing fabrication complexities, controlling the interplay between pinning effects, thermal fluctuations, and skyrmion dynamics, and improvements for faster readout mechanisms (currently, most demonstrations are confined to the limits of measuring instruments) are crucial for realizing its full potential.9,10,60,101 More in-depth examples of some of the above skyrmion-based unconventional systems are discussed in Sec. III.

Skyrmion-based RC, working at the nanosecond timescale with power consumption in the microwatt regime, has been theoretically proposed by Prychynenko et al.8 Due to its independence of concrete details of the reservoir, the input and readout method, various approaches and models have been predicted and analyzed.9–11,135–137 For example, Prychynenko et al.,8 Bourianoff et al.,9 Pinna et al.,10 Raab et al.,60 and Msiska et al.11 have studied the response of a skyrmion fabrics system [as exemplified in Fig. 1(b)] to voltage inputs. In these studies, reservoir computing is based on exploiting the nonlinear current-voltage characteristics of skyrmion systems due to the complex interplay of current-induced dynamics and pinning effects. A readout is possible, for example, as a time traced resistance signal, a spatially resolved magnetization measurement, or a combination of both. By adjusting material parameters that appear as hyperparameters in the reservoir computing model, the skyrmion reservoir can be customized for tasks that rely more on memory or nonlinearity.20 For example, the recently simulated multidimensional input skyrmion-based reservoir demonstrated best-in-class in-materio RC performance in a standard spoken digit classification benchmark task.11 Raab et al. combined the RC principle with the Brownian computing (BC) concept and demonstrated a skyrmion-based RC experimentally.60 BC refers to the broad idea of exploiting intrinsic random dynamics of a physical system to the benefit of a computing architecture.60–64 It is inspired by noise-exploiting mechanisms in biological processes where, e.g., Brownian motion drives molecular machines,157,158 hence the name. There are two main conditions for the underlying system to transfer the advantages of these biophysical mechanisms to computing devices: First, the system must exhibit significant thermal dynamics at operating temperature, which is typically room temperature. Second, for good integrability in existing computing hardware, the system must be addressable electrically, i.e., inputs and outputs may be set and readout by electrical means. Skyrmions are a particularly promising system for BC as they have been shown to undergo thermally activated diffusion53,55,159 and can be measured and manipulated by a variety of different mechanisms.51,65–78,82 In addition, the thermal effects compete with different skyrmion interactions and drives at room temperature.60,160,161 There exists a multitude of ways how exactly thermal random effects can be exploited for different computing architectures.53,60,63,64,162 In particular, RC can be realized by combining the RC concept with thermally activated skyrmion dynamics,60 which is discussed in Subsection III A, along with other skyrmion-based RC approaches. The two subsequent Subsections III B and III C then introduce other non-conventional computing approaches based on thermally activated skyrmion dynamics. These approaches, apart from being promising future applications on their own, aid in understanding the versatility of the BC concept in combination with different computing architectures such as RC.

While several of the theoretical skyrmion RC concepts8–10 heavily rely on the presence of local pinning sites,160 Raab et al. realized Brownian RC by overcoming pinning effects in confined geometries by using thermal skyrmion diffusion.60 Their proof-of-concept reservoir consists of a single skyrmion in a triangular confinement,163 which provides an automatic reset mechanism after the operation due to the repulsive skyrmion-boundary interaction.161 Inputs are encoded by the patterns of voltages at the corners of the triangle [Figs. 2(a) and 2(b)]. The resulting current distribution acts as a biasing mechanism for the thermal skyrmion motion and thereby alters the average spatial distribution of the skyrmion. In a nano-scale device, the probability for a certain region of the sample to be occupied by a skyrmion determines the average local tunnel magnetoresistance (TMR).164 For the proof-of-concept device, the local occupation probability was determined in four regions [white circles in Fig. 2(b)] using Kerr-microscopy to mimic TMR readout via magnetic tunnel junctions.164 The study demonstrates that training a linear readout based on the local occupation probabilities already suffices this minimalistic Brownian RC device to perform 2- and 3-input logic operations including the nonlinearly separable XOR. Moreover, exploiting thermal effects allows for ultra-low-current operation and overcomes pinning effects that would hinder proper operation in a diffusion-free system. Distinguishability of the systems' responses to different input stimuli is key for reliable operation. Pinning effects can drastically reduce the output configuration space as the skyrmion can become pinned at the same position for various excitations hindering proper operation, even if the pinning strength is only slightly stronger than the strength of the drive. This effect can be mitigated by employing thermally active skyrmions, as the resulting skyrmion distribution still reflects both pinning and drive, given that both energy scales are comparable to the scale of thermal fluctuation.

FIG. 2.

(a) and (b) Kerr-microscopy images of the skyrmion-based Brownian RC device by Raab et al.60 for different input voltage combinations. The white circles in (b) depict the regions within which the local skyrmion occupation probability is measured. Adapted from Raab et al., Nat. Commun. 13, 6982 (2022). Copyright 2022 Authors, licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License. (c) Schematic illustration of the skyrmion-based RC by Yokouchi et al.,133 including Kerr-microscopy images of the Hall bars containing skyrmions at different constant OOP fields Hconst. Adapted from Yokouchi et al., Sci. Adv. 8, eabq5652 (2022). Copyright 2022 Authors, licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License. (d) and (e) Performance comparison of RC for a (d) nonlinear transformation and (e) future forecasting tasks using skyrmion (orange) and conical (blue) magnetic phase spaces, respectively. Different magnetic modes are accessed by changing the applied temperature to the magnet. (f) Kerr-microscopy image of the skyrmion reshuffler device by Zázvorka et al.53 The input signal is constructed as a series of time frames, when the skyrmions cross the blue threshold line. The output is produced on crossing the orange line. The corresponding input signal is depicted in blue (top), and the resulting output signal in orange (bottom). Adapted with permission from Zázvorka et al., Nat. Nanotechnol. 14, 658–661 (2019). Copyright 2019 The Springer Nature Limited. (g) Circuit layout for a Brownian token-based half-adder by Brems et al.64 Cjoins (colored/numbered squares) can only be passed by both signal carriers (red and violet bold dots) together. The current input placement of the tokens indicates an input a + b = 0 + 0. The red token on the left side may take computational paths which lead either to Cjoin 3 or 4, whereas the violet token on the right side may reach Cjoins 1 and 4. Since Cjoins can only be traversed in pairs of two tokens, only Cjoin 4 can be passed. By similar tracing of the accessible and computational forward paths, it becomes clear that a value of 0 in both output digits is the only possible result, even if the token movement is completely random. The colored arrows show the relevant directions of driven motion to tune the balance of computation speed and energy consumption of the device. Adapted with permission from Brems et al., Appl. Phys. Lett. 119, 132405 (2021). Copyright 2021 AIP Publishing LLC.

FIG. 2.

(a) and (b) Kerr-microscopy images of the skyrmion-based Brownian RC device by Raab et al.60 for different input voltage combinations. The white circles in (b) depict the regions within which the local skyrmion occupation probability is measured. Adapted from Raab et al., Nat. Commun. 13, 6982 (2022). Copyright 2022 Authors, licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License. (c) Schematic illustration of the skyrmion-based RC by Yokouchi et al.,133 including Kerr-microscopy images of the Hall bars containing skyrmions at different constant OOP fields Hconst. Adapted from Yokouchi et al., Sci. Adv. 8, eabq5652 (2022). Copyright 2022 Authors, licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License. (d) and (e) Performance comparison of RC for a (d) nonlinear transformation and (e) future forecasting tasks using skyrmion (orange) and conical (blue) magnetic phase spaces, respectively. Different magnetic modes are accessed by changing the applied temperature to the magnet. (f) Kerr-microscopy image of the skyrmion reshuffler device by Zázvorka et al.53 The input signal is constructed as a series of time frames, when the skyrmions cross the blue threshold line. The output is produced on crossing the orange line. The corresponding input signal is depicted in blue (top), and the resulting output signal in orange (bottom). Adapted with permission from Zázvorka et al., Nat. Nanotechnol. 14, 658–661 (2019). Copyright 2019 The Springer Nature Limited. (g) Circuit layout for a Brownian token-based half-adder by Brems et al.64 Cjoins (colored/numbered squares) can only be passed by both signal carriers (red and violet bold dots) together. The current input placement of the tokens indicates an input a + b = 0 + 0. The red token on the left side may take computational paths which lead either to Cjoin 3 or 4, whereas the violet token on the right side may reach Cjoins 1 and 4. Since Cjoins can only be traversed in pairs of two tokens, only Cjoin 4 can be passed. By similar tracing of the accessible and computational forward paths, it becomes clear that a value of 0 in both output digits is the only possible result, even if the token movement is completely random. The colored arrows show the relevant directions of driven motion to tune the balance of computation speed and energy consumption of the device. Adapted with permission from Brems et al., Appl. Phys. Lett. 119, 132405 (2021). Copyright 2021 AIP Publishing LLC.

Close modal

Another skyrmion-based RC concept was realized by Yokouchi et al., who have experimentally studied a skyrmion-based RC device capable of complex pattern recognition.133 Their reservoir consists of a collection of Hall bars containing skyrmions, each at a different constant out-of-plane (OOP) field [Fig. 2(c)]. The input signal is encoded as a time-dependent OOP field in addition to the constant OOP field. Due to the different constant OOP fields, the skyrmions in each Hall bar potentially react differently to the input signal. Training is then performed to tune the weights combining the anomalous Hall voltages of all Hall bars. The reservoir succeeds in high-accuracy handwritten digit recognition as well as waveform recognition.

The spectral properties of skyrmions can be exploited for constructing a physical reservoir. Lee et al. recently demonstrated that the GHz dynamics of skyrmions generated in the class of chiral magnets can provide a scheme of phase-tunable, task-adaptive PRC.101 By utilizing rich thermodynamical phases available in multiferroic Cu2OSeO3 at low temperatures, they show that the single reservoir unit can offer multiple reservoir properties, hence, adaptive to different computational tasks that require different reservoir metrics (i.e., nonlinearity, memory capacity, and complexity). The studied scheme is shown to be transferable to other similar systems, including Co8.5Zn8.5Mn3 and FeGe, to operate at above and near room temperatures. In their work, external magnetic field values and temperature are controlled to navigate between available phase spaces to modify the key reservoir properties on demand. Subsequently, translating the input data (e.g., a sinewave signal) into a sequence of magnetic field values can encode its information to the spectral states of various spinwave modes to construct a reservoir. During this process, a particular input protocol, named “mapped field-cycling,” is incorporated to nucleate metastable magnetic phase spaces such as low-temperature skyrmions.165–167 The study demonstrates that the computational power for different tasks highly depends on the choice of the magnetic phase space. For example, as shown in Figs. 2(d) and 2(e), while the skyrmion textures excel in future forecasting, their performance deteriorates substantially for linear-to-nonlinear transformation tasks. However, the conical modes observe the opposite behavior, suggesting a correlation between the intrinsic magnetic phase properties and the task capability, which is related to the properties of the reservoir. These results highlight that a single material system can be reconfigured (by adjusting the magnetic field or temperature) based on the task's nature without creating alternative reservoir systems each time and takes a step closer to flexible on-demand PRC. The task-adaptive nature is important since a typical physical reservoir is often fixed and inflexible in terms of reservoir properties due to the constraint of specific response phenomena of a given physical system: consequently, many physical reservoirs result in severely constrained computational performance as it lacks the versatility to meet demands requiring different reservoir properties. For example, a reservoir system constructed with a high nonlinearity would not be adequate in performing tasks requiring a high memory capacity, and vice versa.

Thermal excitations can not only be used in reservoir computing60 but also for stochastic computing. In skyrmions-based stochastic computing,53,100,168 numerical values are encoded as the probability of a “1” occurring in random bit-streams, and computation results are obtained by averaging over the results of bit-wise operations. For instance, multiplication can be realized by bit-wise application of the AND operation on two input-streams since the “1” probability in the resulting bit-stream is equal to the product of the “1”-probabilities of the two input-streams. Skyrmion-based stochastic computing can offer interesting advantages, such as high error tolerance and increasing accuracy with computation time (length of processed bit-stream). However, one key challenge in this approach is that strong correlations between bit streams severely impair computations as the individual bit-wise computation results will no longer inherit the correct statistical distribution from the input-streams. In 2019, Zázvorka et al. experimentally constructed a skyrmion-based Brownian reshuffler device to decorrelate bit-streams.53 As shown in Fig. 2(f), the device consists of an upper and a lower channel, and a skyrmion passing a certain section of a channel at a given time sets the bit-stream's value to “1” or “0,” respectively. Each channel contains a chamber where the effects of the overall current-induced drift to the right are combined with thermal random diffusion to decorrelate the pre-chamber (blue) and post-chamber (orange) bit-streams. It was demonstrated that this reshuffler device leads to very good decorrelation of the bit-streams while keeping the value encoded in the bit-stream constant.

In Brownian token-based computing,55,61–64 discrete and indivisible signal carriers, called tokens, perform random motion to explore a network of computational paths. A computation is completed when the tokens have traversed the circuit by finding a path connecting the correct input- and output-states. Therein, all logic is contained within the circuit layout such that random motion suffices for the tokens to find the computational forward paths to the elements, which advance the computation. Magnetic skyrmions are particularly promising token candidates due to their quasi-particle nature and thermally induced diffusive dynamics, which can be easily manipulated. The key advantage of this computing method is that energy must not be invested to move the information carriers but only to synchronize their movement at certain points in the circuit, potentially allowing for low-energy operation. Note, matching colored/labelled squares in Fig. 2(g) represent Cjoin modules, which can only be passed across by two tokens at the same time. Brems et al. have proposed a skyrmion-suitable crossing-free circuit for a Brownian half-adder [Fig. 2(g)] along with a framework to tune the balance of speed and energy consumption of token-based computers using artificial diffusion.64 Skyrmion systems, in particular, allow for superimposing thermal diffusion with artificial diffusion (e.g., current-based64 or field-based169); thus, the tokens' dynamics can be adapted to the circuit geometry such that the tokens find the computational forward paths faster. Moreover, the possibility of significant speed-up at the expense of additional energy can mitigate the disadvantage non-deterministic computation times may pose for time-critical applications.64 Experimental advances have been made by Jibiki et al. in implementing skyrmion-based circuit modules for Brownian token-based computing.55,63

Skyrmion-based non-conventional computing is an emerging field that aims to harness the distinct properties of magnetic skyrmions. While this field has already shown several promising results and is expected to play a significant role in the future of unconventional computing, there is still a multitude of challenges left to overcome. These include both short-term goals to make skyrmion-based reservoir computing more competitive, practical, and efficient, as well as long-term challenges that need to be addressed to realize the full potential of future skyrmion-based computing.

The field of RC currently features a wide range of designs and architectures with virtually endless potential for further customization and experimentation since it encompasses any dynamical phenomenon that can be harnessed to build reservoirs. While this diversity is a strength of RC, it also presents one of its biggest challenges as it makes it difficult to achieve cohesion and standardization among the different systems. This is also evident in skyrmion RC where a wide range of diverse system designs have already been put forward, as elaborated in Sec. III, despite the field being in its nascent stages. For example, there are practically no universally applied measures or standards for evaluating and comparing PRC models. Such methods would not only facilitate the selection of the most suitable models for a specific task but also grant researchers valuable insight into the underlying principles and dynamics of reservoir systems. This understanding can be further leveraged to create unconventional systems that incorporate the most advantageous features of existing models. Additionally, by comparing models with varying parameters such as reservoir size and connectivity, researchers can determine the effect of these parameters on system performance and optimize the design of the reservoir accordingly. Although we are yet to realize a unified formalism for RC, progress is being made in certain sub-fields of PRC to introduce reliable measures. In the particular case of skyrmion RC, task-agnostic local metrics have been proposed.20 In addition to performance classifications, it is also important to establish what constitutes fair comparison among models. There have been instances in PRC where researchers have selected or modified datasets to achieve favorable benchmark results. Implementing standardized comparison schemes would help to eliminate such practices and ensure fair and unbiased evaluations.

Reservoirs possess memory capabilities that enable them to retain information about past inputs for a certain period of time due to recurrent connections within the reservoir.170 However, nonlinearity in the reservoir's dynamics decreases memory capacity.171 Therefore, the role of nonlinearity, which is necessary for input mapping, needs to be balanced with the memory capacity for optimal performance. One way to achieve this in RC design is to create a gradient mixture reservoir, where one section of the reservoir has high nonlinearity/low memory, while another section has high memory/low nonlinearity.121 Additionally, it is possible to achieve output states that emphasize either memory or nonlinearity by strategically placing readout contacts.20 

In task-specific RC, it will be important to identify tasks that are particularly suited to skyrmion-based reservoirs. These tasks will fundamentally depend on the intrinsic properties of skyrmion systems, such as the time scales of driven dynamics and decorrelation dynamics (fading memory) as well as the nonlinearity of skyrmion interactions. One of the reasons skyrmions have emerged as promising physical reservoir candidates is their internal and collective dynamics on different time scales and competing interactions on different length scales. Timescale harmonization plays a crucial role in effectively harnessing these distinctive properties, ensuring that diverse temporal behaviors are synchronized and optimally integrated. Time scales are particularly important to consider since a computationally expensive conversion algorithm from the relevant timescale of a specific task to that of the reservoir may prove to be a bottleneck and potentially impede the high computational speed and energy efficiency advantages of RC.

Another important factor to take into consideration is the plethora of excitation methods for skyrmion dynamics like spin-torques43,65,172–174 and field gradients69,70 and readout methods like magneto-resistance.164 These methods must be gauged with regard to their applicability in skyrmion-based RC. Apart from stimulation and response measurement methods, the skyrmion pinning effect has played a significant role in recent RC concepts. Skyrmion pinning is an essential ingredient for some RC approaches and an obstacle for others. So methods to engineer the strength and distribution of pinning areas and thus tune it as necessary for a given reservoir may be major benefits for future RC approaches. This includes both material engineering as well as methods to manipulate the effective pinning effect on state-of-the-art samples.169 Finally, the tradeoffs introduced by thermal effects in skyrmion reservoirs must be further investigated. It has been demonstrated that thermal dynamics can benefit a device's energy efficiency and error tolerance. On the downside, the stochasticity accompanying thermal dynamics is expected to act to the detriment of the systems' short- and long-term memory.

The future of skyrmion RC holds significant promise, with numerous untapped research avenues to be explored, including skyrmion oscillators, cyclic reservoirs, and beyond. Figure 3 depicts the predicted importance of materials, algorithms, and applications, visualized by blue-colored beams that vary in size over time. As research progresses, the field will likely move from a broad range of reservoir materials to only a narrow selection of the most effective, while algorithms and applications are anticipated to grow with advancements in research. In particular, architectures will presumably evolve beyond standard RC. For example, the incorporation of the Brownian computing paradigm was an initiative to blend different ideas into existing RC concepts. Additionally, the figure suggests some key areas for reservoir optimization, such as the use of cascaded architectures, in which multiple physical reservoirs are connected sequentially, allowing for the enhancement of computational capacity and the representation of more complex tasks.121 This approach optimizes the spatial and temporal characteristics of the input data by leveraging the advantages of each individual reservoir. One can also combine the unique strengths of RC with other computational approaches, offering a powerful and versatile hybrid framework for solving complex tasks. For instance, RC can be combined with ANNs to enhance the capacity to learn intricate patterns and generalize effectively.175 By fusing RC's memory-enhanced capabilities and rapid adaptation with the robust learning and optimization mechanisms of ANNs, an ANN/RC hybrid system can be optimized to tackle a wide range of applications, from time series prediction and signal processing to natural language processing and image recognition.

FIG. 3.

Skyrmion reservoir computing perspectives.

FIG. 3.

Skyrmion reservoir computing perspectives.

Close modal

Scalability is a key property where skyrmion RCs likely excel, surpassing alternatives of individually connected components like MTJs,98 nano-oscillators,131 artificial nanomagnets,121 and so on. The intrinsic advantage of skyrmion RC over these systems lies in their natural connectivity and a vast number of degrees of freedom, which would otherwise require artificial enhancement. This naturally leads to more efficient spatial packing and fewer energy losses that would result from the overhead caused by the wiring of the individual components. Additionally, skyrmions provide a localized and topologically stabilized alternative to general spin-wave or domain wall-based devices. Although skyrmions exhibit favorable scalability properties, managing and controlling them effectively becomes increasingly challenging as systems grow larger. To tackle this issue, it is crucial to develop efficient, scalable algorithms tailored for large-scale reservoirs, in addition to other stabilization mechanisms. These algorithms should be able to adapt to variations in the system's size, complexity, or environment, including readout techniques. Incorporating self-organization principles may be beneficial, as they allow the system to dynamically reconfigure and maintain its computational capabilities while scaling.

Despite having numerous advantages that strengthen their position in the emerging field of neuromorphic computing, skyrmions face further challenges that are yet to be addressed. For instance, the development of efficient skyrmion-based devices requires overcoming difficulties in material engineering and optimization, as well as the need for more advanced fabrication techniques. While significant progress has been made in recent years, further research is necessary to identify more affordable and durable material systems that host stable skyrmions over a broad temperature range. Moreover, it will be crucial to develop both efficient, low energy and cost-effective readout methods that can merge seamlessly with I/O components of electronic systems. Currently, reliable optical readout techniques for skyrmions face considerable obstacles, such as limited spatial resolution, signal-to-noise ratios affected by thermal factors, and constraints on high-speed detection. To circumvent these limitations, one can utilize electrical readout techniques that take advantage of magnetoresistive effects. Such methods are presently employed in skyrmion neuromorphic computing prototypes. However, this approach necessitates a relatively large voltage within the device, calling for overall device size expansion. Moving forward, the development of ultrasensitive low-power detection methods will be crucial.

To conclude, skyrmion-based unconventional computing shows great potential as a research area. It is exciting to anticipate the progress of this field over the next few years and to see how skyrmions will be incorporated into mainstream computing applications.

O.L. and H.K. thank the Leverhulme Trust for financial support via RPG-2016-391 and EPSRC for their support through the project EP/X015661/1. M.K., K.E.-S., R.M., and M.A.B. are grateful to the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG, German Research Foundation) for funding this research: Project Nos. 403502522, 403233384-SPP 2137 Skyrmionics, and 320163632 (Emmy Noether) and acknowledge funding from the Emergent AI Centre funded by the Carl-Zeiss-Stiftung. M.K., K.E.-S, and M.A.B. also acknowledge funding from TopDyn and SFB TRR 173 Spin+X (Project A01 No. 268565370 and Project B12 No. 268565370). M.K. and M.A.B. further acknowledge funding from the Horizon 2020 Framework Programme of the European Commission under FET-Open Grant No. 863155 (s-Nebula), Grant No. 856538 (ERC-SyG 3D MAGIC), Grant No. 101070290 (HORIZON-CL4-2021-DIGITAL-EMERGING-01-14 NIMFEIA), and under the Marie Skłodowska-Curie Grant Agreement No. 860060 “Magnetism and the effect of Electric Field” (MagnEFi). M.A.B. is supported by a doctoral scholarship of the Studienstiftung des deutschen Volkes and acknowledges funding from TRR 146 (Project No. 233630050).

The authors have no conflicts to disclose.

Oscar Lee: Visualization (equal); Writing – original draft (equal); Writing – review & editing (equal). Robin Msiska: Visualization (equal); Writing – original draft (equal); Writing – review & editing (equal). Maarten Alexander Brems: Visualization (equal); Writing – original draft (equal); Writing – review & editing (equal). Mathias Kläui: Conceptualization (equal); Project administration (equal); Supervision (equal); Validation (equal); Visualization (equal); Writing – original draft (equal); Writing – review & editing (equal). Hidekazu Kurebayashi: Conceptualization (equal); Project administration (equal); Supervision (equal); Validation (equal); Visualization (equal); Writing – original draft (equal); Writing – review & editing (equal). Karin Everschor-Sitte: Conceptualization (equal); Project administration (equal); Supervision (equal); Validation (equal); Visualization (equal); Writing – original draft (equal); Writing – review & editing (equal).

Data sharing is not applicable to this article as no new data were created or analyzed in this study.

1.
I.
Goodfellow
,
Y.
Bengio
, and
A.
Courville
,
Deep Learning
, Adaptive Computation and Machine Learning (
The MIT Press
,
Cambridge, Massachusetts
,
2016
).
2.
J.
Schmidhuber
, “
Deep learning in neural networks: An overview
,”
Neural Networks
61
,
85
117
(
2015
).
3.
A.
Sherstinsky
, “
Fundamentals of recurrent neural network (RNN) and long short-term memory (LSTM) network
,”
Physica D
404
,
132306
(
2020
).
4.
L.
Gonon
and
J.-P.
Ortega
, “
Reservoir computing universality with stochastic inputs
,”
IEEE Trans. Neural Networks Learn. Syst.
31
,
100
112
(
2020
).
5.
H.
Jaeger
, “
The ‘echo state’ approach to analysing and training recurrent neural networks
,”
Ger. Natl. Res. Cent. Inf. Technol. GMD Technical Report 148
(
2001
).
6.
W.
Maass
,
T.
Natschläger
, and
H.
Markram
, “
Real-time computing without stable states: A new framework for neural computation based on perturbations
,”
Neural Comput.
14
,
2531
2560
(
2002
).
7.
H.
Jaeger
, “
Tutorial on training recurrent neural networks, covering BPPT, RTRL, EKF and the echo state network approach
,”
Ger. Natl. Res. Cent. Inf. Technol. GMD Technical Report 5
(
2002
).
8.
D.
Prychynenko
,
M.
Sitte
,
K.
Litzius
et al, “
Magnetic skyrmion as a nonlinear resistive element: A potential building block for reservoir computing
,”
Phys. Rev. Appl.
9
,
014034
(
2018
).
9.
G.
Bourianoff
,
D.
Pinna
,
M.
Sitte
, and
K.
Everschor-Sitte
, “
Potential implementation of reservoir computing models based on magnetic skyrmions
,”
AIP Adv.
8
,
055602
(
2018
).
10.
D.
Pinna
,
G.
Bourianoff
, and
K.
Everschor-Sitte
, “
Reservoir computing with random skyrmion textures
,”
Phys. Rev. Appl.
14
,
054020
(
2020
).
11.
R.
Msiska
,
J.
Love
,
J.
Mulkers
et al, “
Audio classification with skyrmion reservoirs
,”
Adv. Intell. Syst.
(published online, 2023).
12.
H.
Jaeger
, “
Short term memory in echo state networks
,”
Ger. Natl. Res. Cent. Inf. Technol. GMD Technical Report 152
(
2002
).
13.
J.
Dambre
,
D.
Verstraeten
,
B.
Schrauwen
, and
S.
Massar
, “
Information processing capacity of dynamical systems
,”
Sci. Rep.
2
,
514
(
2012
).
14.
T. L.
Carroll
, “
Optimizing memory in reservoir computers
,”
Chaos
32
,
023123
(
2022
).
15.
H.
Jaeger
and
H.
Haas
, “
Harnessing nonlinearity: Predicting chaotic systems and saving energy in wireless communication
,”
Science
304
,
78
80
(
2004
).
16.
I. A.
Khovanov
, “
Stochastic approach for assessing the predictability of chaotic time series using reservoir computing
,”
Chaos
31
,
083105
(
2021
).
17.
M.
Lukoševičius
and
H.
Jaeger
, “
Reservoir computing approaches to recurrent neural network training
,”
Comput. Sci. Rev.
3
,
127
149
(
2009
).
18.
I. B.
Yildiz
,
H.
Jaeger
, and
S. J.
Kiebel
, “
Re-visiting the echo state property
,”
Neural Networks
35
,
1
9
(
2012
).
19.
A. A.
Ferreira
and
T. B.
Ludermir
, “
Genetic algorithm for reservoir computing optimization
,” in
Proceedings of the 2009 International Joint Conference on Neural Networks
(
IEEE
,
2009
), pp.
811
815
.
20.
J.
Love
,
J.
Mulkers
,
R.
Msiska
et al, “
Spatial analysis of physical reservoir computers
,” arXiv:2108.01512 (
2021
).
21.
C. G.
Langton
, “
Computation at the edge of chaos: Phase transitions and emergent computation
,”
Physica D
42
,
12
37
(
1990
).
22.
N.
Bertschinger
and
T.
Natschläger
, “
Real-time computation at the edge of chaos in recurrent neural networks
,”
Neural Comput.
16
,
1413
1436
(
2004
).
23.
R.
Legenstein
and
W.
Maass
, “
Edge of chaos and prediction of computational performance for neural circuit models
,”
Neural Networks
20
,
323
334
(
2007
).
24.
T. L.
Carroll
, “
Do reservoir computers work best at the edge of chaos?
,”
Chaos
30
,
121109
(
2020
).
25.
H.
Jaeger
and
F.
Catthoor
, “
Timescales: The choreography of classical and unconventional computing
,” arXiv:2301.00893 (
2023
).
26.
G.
Tanaka
,
T.
Yamane
,
J. B.
Héroux
et al, “
Recent advances in physical reservoir computing: A review
,”
Neural Networks
115
,
100
123
(
2019
).
27.
K.
Nakajima
, “
Physical reservoir computing—An introductory perspective
,”
Jpn. J. Appl. Phys., Part 1
59
,
060501
(
2020
).
28.
Reservoir Computing: Theory, Physical Implementations, and Applications
, edited by
K.
Nakajima
and
I.
Fischer
(
Springer
,
Singapore
,
2021
).
29.
D. V.
Christensen
,
R.
Dittmann
,
B.
Linares-Barranco
et al, “
2022 roadmap on neuromorphic computing and engineering
,”
Neuromorphic Comput. Eng.
2
,
022501
(
2022
).
30.
D. V.
Buonomano
and
W.
Maass
, “
State-dependent computations: Spatiotemporal processing in cortical networks
,”
Nat. Rev. Neurosci.
10
,
113
125
(
2009
).
31.
J.
Nokkala
,
R.
Martínez-Peña
,
R.
Zambrini
, and
M. C.
Soriano
, “
High-performance reservoir computing with fluctuations in linear networks
,”
IEEE Trans. Neural Networks Learn. Syst.
33
,
2664
2675
(
2022
).
32.
T. H. R.
Skyrme
and
B. F. J.
Schonland
, “
A non-linear field theory
,”
Proc. R. Soc. London, Ser. A
260
,
127
138
(
1961
).
33.
A. N.
Bogdanov
and
D.
Yablonskii
, “
Thermodynamically stable ‘vortices’ in magnetically ordered crystals. The mixed state of magnets
,”
Zh. Éksp. Teor. Fiz.
95
,
178
(
1989
).
34.
S.
Mühlbauer
,
B.
Binz
,
F.
Jonietz
et al, “
Skyrmion lattice in a chiral magnet
,”
Science
323
,
915
919
(
2009
).
35.
A.
Fert
,
N.
Reyren
, and
V.
Cros
, “
Magnetic skyrmions: Advances in physics and potential applications
,”
Nat. Rev. Mater.
2
,
1
15
(
2017
).
36.
K.
Everschor-Sitte
,
J.
Masell
,
R. M.
Reeve
, and
M.
Kläui
, “
Perspective: Magnetic skyrmions—Overview of recent progress in an active research field
,”
J. Appl. Phys.
124
,
240901
(
2018
).
37.
A. N.
Bogdanov
and
C.
Panagopoulos
, “
Physical foundations and basic properties of magnetic skyrmions
,”
Nat. Rev. Phys.
2
,
492
498
(
2020
).
38.
B.
Göbel
,
I.
Mertig
, and
O. A.
Tretiakov
, “
Beyond skyrmions: Review and perspectives of alternative magnetic quasiparticles
,”
Phys. Rep.
895
,
1
28
(
2021
).
39.
W.
Jiang
,
G.
Chen
,
K.
Liu
et al, “
Skyrmions in magnetic multilayers
,”
Phys. Rep.
704
,
1
49
(
2017
).
40.
G.
Finocchio
,
F.
Büttner
,
R.
Tomasello
et al, “
Magnetic skyrmions: From fundamental to applications
,”
J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys.
49
,
423001
(
2016
).
41.
Y.
Tokura
and
N.
Kanazawa
, “
Magnetic skyrmion materials
,”
Chem. Rev.
121
,
2857
2897
(
2021
).
42.
X. Z.
Yu
,
Y.
Onose
,
N.
Kanazawa
et al, “
Real-space observation of a two-dimensional skyrmion crystal
,”
Nature
465
,
901
904
(
2010
).
43.
S.
Woo
,
K.
Litzius
,
B.
Krüger
et al, “
Observation of room-temperature magnetic skyrmions and their current-driven dynamics in ultrathin metallic ferromagnets
,”
Nat. Mater.
15
,
501
506
(
2016
).
44.
C.
Moreau-Luchaire
,
C.
Moutafis
,
N.
Reyren
et al, “
Additive interfacial chiral interaction in multilayers for stabilization of small individual skyrmions at room temperature
,”
Nat. Nanotechnol.
11
,
444
448
(
2016
).
45.
O.
Boulle
,
J.
Vogel
,
H.
Yang
et al, “
Room-temperature chiral magnetic skyrmions in ultrathin magnetic nanostructures
,”
Nat. Nanotechnol.
11
,
449
454
(
2016
).
46.
A. O.
Leonov
,
U. K.
Rößler
, and
M.
Mostovoy
, “
Target-skyrmions and skyrmion clusters in nanowires of chiral magnets
,”
EPJ Web Conf.
75
,
05002
(
2014
).
47.
H.
Du
,
D.
Liang
,
C.
Jin
et al, “
Electrical probing of field-driven cascading quantized transitions of skyrmion cluster states in MnSi nanowires
,”
Nat. Commun.
6
,
7637
(
2015
).
48.
T.
Adams
,
S.
Mühlbauer
,
C.
Pfleiderer
et al, “
Long-range crystalline nature of the skyrmion lattice in MnSi
,”
Phys. Rev. Lett.
107
,
217206
(
2011
).
49.
S.
Heinze
,
K.
von Bergmann
,
M.
Menzel
et al, “
Spontaneous atomic-scale magnetic skyrmion lattice in two dimensions
,”
Nat. Phys.
7
,
713
718
(
2011
).
50.
C.-Y.
You
and
N.-H.
Kim
, “
Critical Dzyaloshinskii–Moriya interaction energy density for the skyrmion states formation in ultrathin ferromagnetic layer
,”
Curr. Appl. Phys.
15
,
298
301
(
2015
).
51.
T.
Schulz
,
R.
Ritz
,
A.
Bauer
et al, “
Emergent electrodynamics of skyrmions in a chiral magnet
,”
Nat. Phys.
8
,
301
304
(
2012
).
52.
C.
Schütte
,
J.
Iwasaki
,
A.
Rosch
, and
N.
Nagaosa
, “
Inertia, diffusion, and dynamics of a driven skyrmion
,”
Phys. Rev. B
90
,
174434
(
2014
).
53.
J.
Zázvorka
,
F.
Jakobs
,
D.
Heinze
et al, “
Thermal skyrmion diffusion used in a reshuffler device
,”
Nat. Nanotechnol.
14
,
658
661
(
2019
).
54.
L.
Zhao
,
Z.
Wang
,
X.
Zhang
et al, “
Topology-dependent Brownian gyromotion of a single skyrmion
,”
Phys. Rev. Lett.
125
,
027206
(
2020
).
55.
T.
Nozaki
,
Y.
Jibiki
,
M.
Goto
et al, “
Brownian motion of skyrmion bubbles and its control by voltage applications
,”
Appl. Phys. Lett.
114
,
012402
(
2019
).
56.
J.
Müller
and
A.
Rosch
, “
Capturing of a magnetic skyrmion with a hole
,”
Phys. Rev. B
91
,
054410
(
2015
).
57.
U. K.
Rößler
,
A. N.
Bogdanov
, and
C.
Pfleiderer
, “
Spontaneous skyrmion ground states in magnetic metals
,”
Nature
442
,
797
801
(
2006
).
58.
M. N.
Wilson
,
A. B.
Butenko
,
A. N.
Bogdanov
, and
T. L.
Monchesky
, “
Chiral skyrmions in cubic helimagnet films: The role of uniaxial anisotropy
,”
Phys. Rev. B
89
,
094411
(
2014
).
59.
A.
Magni
,
G.
Carlotti
,
A.
Casiraghi
et al, “
Key points in the determination of the interfacial Dzyaloshinskii–Moriya interaction from asymmetric bubble domain expansion
,”
IEEE Trans. Magn.
58
,
1
16
(
2022
).
60.
K.
Raab
,
M. A.
Brems
,
G.
Beneke
et al, “
Brownian reservoir computing realized using geometrically confined skyrmion dynamics
,”
Nat. Commun.
13
,
6982
(
2022
).
61.
F.
Peper
,
J.
Lee
,
J.
Carmona
et al, “
Brownian circuits: Fundamentals
,”
J. Emerg. Technol. Comput. Syst.
9
,
1
24
(
2013
).
62.
J.
Lee
,
F.
Peper
,
S. D.
Cotofana
et al, “
Brownian circuits: Designs
,”
Int. J. Unconv. Comput.
12
,
341
362
(
2016
).
63.
Y.
Jibiki
,
M.
Goto
,
E.
Tamura
et al, “
Skyrmion Brownian circuit implemented in continuous ferromagnetic thin film
,”
Appl. Phys. Lett.
117
,
082402
(
2020
).
64.
M. A.
Brems
,
M.
Kläui
, and
P.
Virnau
, “
Circuits and excitations to enable Brownian token-based computing with skyrmions
,”
Appl. Phys. Lett.
119
,
132405
(
2021
).
65.
F.
Jonietz
,
S.
Mühlbauer
,
C.
Pfleiderer
et al, “
Spin transfer torques in MnSi at ultralow current densities
,”
Science
330
,
1648
1651
(
2010
).
66.
J.
Zang
,
M.
Mostovoy
,
J. H.
Han
, and
N.
Nagaosa
, “
Dynamics of skyrmion crystals in metallic thin films
,”
Phys. Rev. Lett.
107
,
136804
(
2011
).
67.
J.
Iwasaki
,
M.
Mochizuki
, and
N.
Nagaosa
, “
Universal current-velocity relation of skyrmion motion in chiral magnets
,”
Nat. Commun.
4
,
1463
(
2013
).
68.
S. L.
Zhang
,
W. W.
Wang
,
D. M.
Burn
et al, “
Manipulation of skyrmion motion by magnetic field gradients
,”
Nat. Commun.
9
,
2115
(
2018
).
69.
C.
Moutafis
,
S.
Komineas
, and
J. A. C.
Bland
, “
Dynamics and switching processes for magnetic bubbles in nanoelements
,”
Phys. Rev. B
79
,
224429
(
2009
).
70.
F.
Büttner
,
C.
Moutafis
,
M.
Schneider
et al, “
Dynamics and inertia of skyrmionic spin structures
,”
Nat. Phys.
11
,
225
228
(
2015
).
71.
Y.
Nakatani
,
M.
Hayashi
,
S.
Kanai
et al, “
Electric field control of skyrmions in magnetic nanodisks
,”
Appl. Phys. Lett.
108
,
152403
(
2016
).
72.
Y.
Liu
,
N.
Lei
,
C.
Wang
et al, “
Voltage-driven high-speed skyrmion motion in a skyrmion-shift device
,”
Phys. Rev. Appl.
11
,
014004
(
2019
).
73.
Y.
Ba
,
S.
Zhuang
,
Y.
Zhang
et al, “
Electric-field control of skyrmions in multiferroic heterostructure via magnetoelectric coupling
,”
Nat. Commun.
12
,
322
(
2021
).
74.
X.
Zhang
,
M.
Ezawa
,
D.
Xiao
et al, “
All-magnetic control of skyrmions in nanowires by a spin wave
,”
Nanotechnology
26
,
225701
(
2015
).
75.
X.
Zhang
,
J.
Müller
,
J.
Xia
et al, “
Motion of skyrmions in nanowires driven by magnonic momentum-transfer forces
,”
New J. Phys.
19
,
065001
(
2017
).
76.
C.
Psaroudaki
and
D.
Loss
, “
Skyrmions driven by intrinsic magnons
,”
Phys. Rev. Lett.
120
,
237203
(
2018
).
77.
L.
Kong
and
J.
Zang
, “
Dynamics of an insulating skyrmion under a temperature gradient
,”
Phys. Rev. Lett.
111
,
067203
(
2013
).
78.
E.
Raimondo
,
E.
Saugar
,
J.
Barker
et al, “
Temperature-gradient-driven magnetic skyrmion motion
,”
Phys. Rev. Appl.
18
,
024062
(
2022
).
79.
M.
Mochizuki
,
X. Z.
Yu
,
S.
Seki
et al, “
Thermally driven ratchet motion of a skyrmion microcrystal and topological magnon Hall effect
,”
Nat. Mater.
13
,
241
246
(
2014
).
80.
R. E.
Troncoso
and
A. S.
Núñez
, “
Thermally assisted current-driven skyrmion motion
,”
Phys. Rev. B
89
,
224403
(
2014
).
81.
Z.
Wang
,
M.
Guo
,
H.-A.
Zhou
et al, “
Thermal generation, manipulation and thermoelectric detection of skyrmions
,”
Nat. Electron.
3
,
672
679
(
2020
).
82.
N.
Romming
,
C.
Hanneken
,
M.
Menzel
et al, “
Writing and deleting single magnetic skyrmions
,”
Science
341
,
636
639
(
2013
).
83.
K.
Everschor
,
M.
Garst
,
R. A.
Duine
, and
A.
Rosch
, “
Current-induced rotational torques in the skyrmion lattice phase of chiral magnets
,”
Phys. Rev. B
84
,
064401
(
2011
).
84.
K.
Everschor
,
M.
Garst
,
B.
Binz
et al, “
Rotating skyrmion lattices by spin torques and field or temperature gradients
,”
Phys. Rev. B
86
,
054432
(
2012
).
85.
X. S.
Wang
,
H. Y.
Yuan
, and
X. R.
Wang
, “
A theory on skyrmion size
,”
Commun. Phys.
1
,
1
7
(
2018
).
86.
H.
Wu
,
X.
Hu
,
K.
Jing
, and
X. R.
Wang
, “
Size and profile of skyrmions in skyrmion crystals
,”
Commun. Phys.
4
,
1
7
(
2021
).
87.
S.-Z.
Lin
,
C.
Reichhardt
,
C. D.
Batista
, and
A.
Saxena
, “
Dynamics of skyrmions in chiral magnets: Dynamic phase transitions and equation of motion
,”
J. Appl. Phys
115
,
17D109
(
2014
).
88.
A.
Fert
,
V.
Cros
, and
J.
Sampaio
, “
Skyrmions on the track
,”
Nat. Nanotechnol.
8
,
152
156
(
2013
).
89.
R.
Tomasello
,
E.
Martinez
,
R.
Zivieri
et al, “
A strategy for the design of skyrmion racetrack memories
,”
Sci. Rep.
4
,
6784
(
2014
).
90.
X.
Zhang
,
M.
Ezawa
, and
Y.
Zhou
, “
Magnetic skyrmion logic gates: Conversion, duplication and merging of skyrmions
,”
Sci. Rep.
5
,
9400
(
2015
).
91.
S.
Luo
,
M.
Song
,
X.
Li
et al, “
Reconfigurable skyrmion logic gates
,”
Nano Lett.
18
,
1180
1184
(
2018
).
92.
X.
Zhang
,
W.
Cai
,
X.
Zhang
et al, “
Skyrmions in magnetic tunnel junctions
,”
ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces
10
,
16887
16892
(
2018
).
93.
N. E.
Penthorn
,
X.
Hao
,
Z.
Wang
et al, “
Experimental observation of single skyrmion signatures in a magnetic tunnel junction
,”
Phys. Rev. Lett.
122
,
257201
(
2019
).
94.
S.
Zhang
,
J.
Wang
,
Q.
Zheng
et al, “
Current-induced magnetic skyrmions oscillator
,”
New J. Phys.
17
,
023061
(
2015
).
95.
F.
Garcia-Sanchez
,
J.
Sampaio
,
N.
Reyren
et al, “
A skyrmion-based spin-torque nano-oscillator
,”
New J. Phys.
18
,
075011
(
2016
).
96.
J.
Grollier
,
D.
Querlioz
,
K. Y.
Camsari
et al, “
Neuromorphic spintronics
,”
Nat. Electron.
3
,
360
370
(
2020
).
97.
J.
Zhou
and
J.
Chen
, “
Prospect of spintronics in neuromorphic computing
,”
Adv. Electron. Mater.
7
,
2100465
(
2021
).
98.
G.
Finocchio
,
M.
Di Ventra
,
K. Y.
Camsari
et al, “
The promise of spintronics for unconventional computing
,”
J. Magn. Magn. Mater.
521
,
167506
(
2021
).
99.
K. M.
Song
,
J.-S.
Jeong
,
B.
Pan
et al, “
Skyrmion-based artificial synapses for neuromorphic computing
,”
Nat. Electron.
3
,
148
155
(
2020
).
100.
D.
Pinna
,
F.
Abreu Araujo
,
J.-V.
Kim
et al, “
Skyrmion gas manipulation for probabilistic computing
,”
Phys. Rev. Appl.
9
,
064018
(
2018
).
101.
O.
Lee
,
T.
Wei
,
K. D.
Stenning
et al, “
Task-adaptive physical reservoir computing
,” arXiv:2209.06962 (
2022
).
102.
M.
Cucchi
,
C.
Gruener
,
L.
Petrauskas
et al, “
Reservoir computing with biocompatible organic electrochemical networks for brain-inspired biosignal classification
,”
Sci. Adv.
7
,
eabh0693
(
2021
).
103.
T.
Sumi
,
H.
Yamamoto
,
Y.
Katori
et al, “
Biological neurons act as generalization filters in reservoir computing
,”
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci.
120
,
e2217008120
(
2023
).
104.
R. B.
Rashid
,
X.
Ji
, and
J.
Rivnay
, “
Organic electrochemical transistors in bioelectronic circuits
,”
Biosens. Bioelectron.
190
,
113461
(
2021
).
105.
S.
Pecqueur
,
M.
Mastropasqua Talamo
,
D.
Guérin
et al, “
Neuromorphic time-dependent pattern classification with organic electrochemical transistor arrays
,”
Adv. Electron. Mater.
4
,
1800166
(
2018
).
106.
K.
Toprasertpong
,
E.
Nako
,
Z.
Wang
et al, “
Reservoir computing on a silicon platform with a ferroelectric field-effect transistor
,”
Commun. Eng.
1
,
1
9
(
2022
).
107.
A. N.
Elbedwehy
,
A. M.
El-Mohandes
,
A.
Elnakib
, and
M. E.
Abou-Elsoud
, “
FPGA-based reservoir computing system for ECG denoising
,”
Microprocess. Microsyst.
91
,
104549
(
2022
).
108.
F.
Nowshin
,
Y.
Zhang
,
L.
Liu
, and
Y.
Yi
, “
Recent advances in reservoir computing with a focus on electronic reservoirs
,” in
Proceedings of the 2020 11th International Green and Sustainable Computing Workshops (IGSC)
(
IEEE
,
2020
), pp.
1
8
.
109.
D.
Joksas
,
A.
AlMutairi
,
O.
Lee
et al, “
Memristive, spintronic, and 2D-materials-based devices to improve and complement computing hardware
,”
Adv. Intell. Syst.
4
,
2200068
(
2022
).
110.
S.
Watt
and
M.
Kostylev
, “
Reservoir computing using a spin-wave delay-line active-ring resonator based on yttrium-iron-garnet film
,”
Phys. Rev. Appl.
13
,
034057
(
2020
).
111.
L.
Millet
,
H.
Jeon
,
B.
Kim
et al, “
Reservoir computing using photon-magnon coupling
,”
Appl. Phys. Lett.
119
,
182405
(
2021
).
112.
L.
Körber
,
C.
Heins
,
T.
Hula
et al, “
Pattern recognition with a magnon-scattering reservoir
,” arXiv:2211.02328 (
2022
).
113.
G.
Milano
,
G.
Pedretti
,
K.
Montano
et al, “
In materia reservoir computing with a fully memristive architecture based on self-organizing nanowire networks
,”
Nat. Mater.
21
,
195
202
(
2022
).
114.
Y.
Zhong
,
J.
Tang
,
X.
Li
et al, “
A memristor-based analogue reservoir computing system for real-time and power-efficient signal processing
,”
Nat. Electron.
5
,
672
681
(
2022
).
115.
A.
Mehonic
,
A.
Sebastian
,
B.
Rajendran
et al, “
Memristors—From in-memory computing, deep learning acceleration, and spiking neural networks to the future of neuromorphic and bio-inspired computing
,”
Adv. Intell. Syst.
2
,
2000085
(
2020
).
116.
S.
Kumar
,
X.
Wang
,
J. P.
Strachan
et al, “
Dynamical memristors for higher-complexity neuromorphic computing
,”
Nat. Rev. Mater.
7
,
575
591
(
2022
).
117.
H.
Nomura
,
T.
Furuta
,
K.
Tsujimoto
et al, “
Reservoir computing with dipole-coupled nanomagnets
,”
Jpn. J. Appl. Phys., Part 1
58
,
070901
(
2019
).
118.
R. W.
Dawidek
,
T. J.
Hayward
,
I. T.
Vidamour
et al, “
Dynamically driven emergence in a nanomagnetic system
,”
Adv. Funct. Mater.
31
,
2008389
(
2021
).
119.
A.
Welbourne
,
A. L. R.
Levy
,
M. O. A.
Ellis
et al, “
Voltage-controlled superparamagnetic ensembles for low-power reservoir computing
,”
Appl. Phys. Lett.
118
,
202402
(
2021
).
120.
J. C.
Gartside
,
K. D.
Stenning
,
A.
Vanstone
et al, “
Reconfigurable training and reservoir computing in an artificial spin-vortex ice via spin-wave fingerprinting
,”
Nat. Nanotechnol.
17
,
460
469
(
2022
).
121.
K. D.
Stenning
,
J. C.
Gartside
,
L.
Manneschi
et al, “
Adaptive programmable networks for in materia neuromorphic computing
,” arXiv:2211.06373 (
2022
).
122.
I.
Vidamour
,
C.
Swindells
,
G.
Venkat
et al, “
Reservoir computing with emergent dynamics in a magnetic metamaterial
,” arXiv:2206.04446 (
2022
).
123.
G. V.
der Sande
,
D.
Brunner
, and
M. C.
Soriano
, “
Advances in photonic reservoir computing
,”
Nanophotonics
6
,
561
576
(
2017
).
124.
P.
Antonik
,
M.
Haelterman
, and
S.
Massar
, “
Brain-inspired photonic signal processor for generating periodic patterns and emulating chaotic systems
,”
Phys. Rev. Appl.
7
,
054014
(
2017
).
125.
K.
Takano
,
C.
Sugano
,
M.
Inubushi
et al, “
Compact reservoir computing with a photonic integrated circuit
,”
Opt. Express
26
,
29424
29439
(
2018
).
126.
Photonic Reservoir Computing: Optical Recurrent Neural Networks
, edited by
D.
Brunner
,
M. C.
Soriano
, and
G. V.
der Sande
(
De Gruyter
,
Berlin, Boston
,
2019
).
127.
M.
Rafayelyan
,
J.
Dong
,
Y.
Tan
et al, “
Large-scale optical reservoir computing for spatiotemporal chaotic systems prediction
,”
Phys. Rev. X
10
,
041037
(
2020
).
128.
S.
Xiang
,
Y.
Han
,
Z.
Song
et al, “
A review: Photonics devices, architectures, and algorithms for optical neural computing
,”
J. Semicond.
42
,
023105
(
2021
).
129.
M.
Nakajima
,
K.
Tanaka
, and
T.
Hashimoto
, “
Scalable reservoir computing on coherent linear photonic processor
,”
Commun. Phys.
4
,
1
12
(
2021
).
130.
J.
Torrejon
,
M.
Riou
,
F. A.
Araujo
et al, “
Neuromorphic computing with nanoscale spintronic oscillators
,”
Nature
547
,
428
431
(
2017
).
131.
M.
Romera
,
P.
Talatchian
,
S.
Tsunegi
et al, “
Vowel recognition with four coupled spin-torque nano-oscillators
,”
Nature
563
,
230
234
(
2018
).
132.
W.
Namiki
,
D.
Nishioka
,
Y.
Yamaguchi
et al, “
Experimental demonstration of high-performance physical reservoir computing with nonlinear interfered spin wave multi-detection
,” arXiv:2207.03216 (
2022
).
133.
T.
Yokouchi
,
S.
Sugimoto
,
B.
Rana
et al, “
Pattern recognition with neuromorphic computing using magnetic field–induced dynamics of skyrmions
,”
Sci. Adv.
8
,
eabq5652
(
2022
).
134.
M.
Cucchi
,
S.
Abreu
,
G.
Ciccone
et al, “
Hands-on reservoir computing: A tutorial for practical implementation
,”
Neuromorphic Comput. Eng.
2
,
032002
(
2022
).
135.
M.-K.
Lee
and
M.
Mochizuki
, “
Reservoir computing with spin waves in a skyrmion crystal
,”
Phys. Rev. Appl.
18
,
014074
(
2022
).
136.
W.
Jiang
,
L.
Chen
,
K.
Zhou
et al, “
Physical reservoir computing using magnetic skyrmion memristor and spin torque nano-oscillator
,”
Appl. Phys. Lett.
115
,
192403
(
2019
).
137.
M. M.
Rajib
,
W. A.
Misba
,
M. F. F.
Chowdhury
et al, “
Skyrmion based energy-efficient straintronic physical reservoir computing
,”
Neuromorphic Comput. Eng.
2
,
044011
(
2022
).
138.
H.
Lee
,
Y.
Won
, and
J. H.
Oh
, “
Neuromorphic bioelectronics based on semiconducting polymers
,”
J. Polym. Sci.
60
,
348
376
(
2022
).
139.
J.
Song
and
F.
Yan
, “
Applications of organic electrochemical transistors in flexible bioelectronics
,”
IEEE Flexible Electron.
1
,
88
97
(
2022
).
140.
K.-N.
Kim
,
M.-J.
Sung
,
H.-L.
Park
, and
T.-W.
Lee
, “
Organic synaptic transistors for bio-hybrid neuromorphic electronics
,”
Adv. Electron. Mater.
8
,
2100935
(
2022
).
141.
M. R.
Dranias
,
H.
Ju
,
E.
Rajaram
, and
A. M.
VanDongen
, “
Short-term memory in networks of dissociated cortical neurons
,”
J. Neurosci.
33
,
1940
1953
(
2013
).
142.
T.
Kubota
,
K.
Nakajima
, and
H.
Takahashi
, “
Echo state property of neuronal cell cultures
,” in
Artificial Neural Networks and Machine Learning–ICANN 2019: Workshop and Special Sessions
, edited by
I. V.
Tetko
,
V.
Kůrková
,
P.
Karpov
, and
F.
Theis
(
Springer International Publishing
,
Cham
,
2019
), pp.
137
148
.
143.
J. H.
Venezia
,
S. M.
Thurman
,
W.
Matchin
et al, “
Timing in audiovisual speech perception: A mini review and new psychophysical data
,”
Atten. Percept. Psychophys.
78
,
583
601
(
2016
).
144.
A. I.
Khan
,
A.
Keshavarzi
, and
S.
Datta
, “
The future of ferroelectric field-effect transistor technology
,”
Nat. Electron.
3
,
588
597
(
2020
).
145.
D.
Marković
,
A.
Mizrahi
,
D.
Querlioz
, and
J.
Grollier
, “
Physics for neuromorphic computing
,”
Nat. Rev. Phys.
2
,
499
510
(
2020
).
146.
J. Y.
Kim
,
M.-J.
Choi
, and
H. W.
Jang
, “
Ferroelectric field effect transistors: Progress and perspective
,”
APL Mater.
9
,
021102
(
2021
).
147.
H.
Mulaosmanovic
,
E. T.
Breyer
,
S.
Dünkel
et al, “
Ferroelectric field-effect transistors based on HfO2: A review
,”
Nanotechnology
32
,
502002
(
2021
).
148.
S.
Salahuddin
,
K.
Ni
, and
S.
Datta
, “
The era of hyper-scaling in electronics
,”
Nat. Electron.
1
,
442
450
(
2018
).
149.
J.
Grollier
,
D.
Querlioz
, and
M. D.
Stiles
, “
Spintronic nanodevices for bioinspired computing
,”
Proc. IEEE
104
,
2024
2039
(
2016
).
150.
D. A.
Allwood
,
M. O. A.
Ellis
,
D.
Griffin
et al, “
A perspective on physical reservoir computing with nanomagnetic devices
,”
Appl. Phys. Lett.
122
,
040501
(
2023
).
151.
T.
Furuta
,
K.
Fujii
,
K.
Nakajima
et al, “
Macromagnetic simulation for reservoir computing utilizing spin dynamics in magnetic tunnel junctions
,”
Phys. Rev. Appl.
10
,
034063
(
2018
).
152.
T.
Kanao
,
H.
Suto
,
K.
Mizushima
et al, “
Reservoir computing on spin-torque oscillator array
,”
Phys. Rev. Appl.
12
,
024052
(
2019
).
153.
D.
Markovic
,
N.
Leroux
,
M.
Riou
et al, “
Reservoir computing with the frequency, phase, and amplitude of spin-torque nano-oscillators
,”
Appl. Phys. Lett.
114
,
012409
(
2019
).
154.
S.
Tsunegi
,
T.
Taniguchi
,
K.
Nakajima
et al, “
Physical reservoir computing based on spin torque oscillator with forced synchronization
,”
Appl. Phys. Lett.
114
,
164101
(
2019
).
155.
T.
Yamaguchi
,
S.
Tsunegi
,
K.
Nakajima
, and
T.
Taniguchi
, “
Computational capability for physical reservoir computing using a spin-torque oscillator with two free layers
,”
Phys. Rev. B
107
,
054406
(
2023
).
156.
M. F. F.
Chowdhury
,
W. A.
Misba
,
M. M.
Rajib
et al, “
Focused surface acoustic wave induced nano-oscillator based reservoir computing
,”
Appl. Phys. Lett.
121
,
102402
(
2022
).
157.
T.
Yanagida
, “
Fluctuation as a tool of biological molecular machines
,”
Biosystems
93
,
3
7
(
2008
).
158.
P.
Reimann
, “
Brownian motors: Noisy transport far from equilibrium
,”
Phys. Rep.
361
,
57
265
(
2002
).
159.
N.
Kerber
,
M.
Weißenhofer
,
K.
Raab
et al, “
Anisotropic skyrmion diffusion controlled by field-induced symmetry breaking
,”
Phys. Rev. Appl.
15
,
044029
(
2021
).
160.
R.
Gruber
,
J.
Zázvorka
,
M. A.
Brems
et al, “
Skyrmion pinning energetics in thin film systems
,”
Nat. Commun.
13
,
3144
(
2022
).
161.
Y.
Ge
,
J.
Rothörl
,
M. A.
Brems
et al, “
Constructing coarse-grained skyrmion potentials from experimental data with iterative Boltzmann inversion
,”
Commun. Phys.
6
,
30
(
2023
).
162.
R.
Ishikawa
,
M.
Goto
,
H.
Nomura
, and
Y.
Suzuki
, “
Implementation of skyrmion cellular automaton using Brownian motion and magnetic dipole interaction
,”
Appl. Phys. Lett.
119
,
072402
(
2021
).
163.
C.
Song
,
N.
Kerber
,
J.
Rothörl
et al, “
Commensurability between element symmetry and the number of skyrmions governing skyrmion diffusion in confined geometries
,”
Adv. Funct. Mater.
31
,
2010739
(
2021
).
164.
R.
Tomasello
,
M.
Ricci
,
P.
Burrascano
et al, “
Electrical detection of single magnetic skyrmion at room temperature
,”
AIP Adv.
7
,
056022
(
2017
).
165.
M.
Halder
,
A.
Chacon
,
A.
Bauer
et al, “
Thermodynamic evidence of a second skyrmion lattice phase and tilted conical phase in Cu2OSeO3
,”
Phys. Rev. B
98
,
144429
(
2018
).
166.
A.
Aqeel
,
J.
Sahliger
,
T.
Taniguchi
et al, “
Microwave spectroscopy of the low-temperature skyrmion state in Cu2OSeO3
,”
Phys. Rev. Lett.
126
,
017202
(
2021
).
167.
O.
Lee
,
J.
Sahliger
,
A.
Aqeel
et al, “
Tunable gigahertz dynamics of low-temperature skyrmion lattice in a chiral magnet
,”
J. Phys.: Condens. Matter
34
,
095801
(
2022
).
168.
H.
Zhang
,
D.
Zhu
,
W.
Kang
et al, “
Stochastic computing implemented by skyrmionic logic devices
,”
Phys. Rev. Appl.
13
,
054049
(
2020
).
169.
R.
Gruber
,
M. A.
Brems
,
J.
Rothörl
et al, “
300 times increased diffusive skyrmion dynamics and effective pinning reduction by periodic field excitation
,”
Adv. Mater
35
,
2208922
(
2023
).
170.
D.
Verstraeten
,
B.
Schrauwen
,
M.
D'Haene
, and
D.
Stroobandt
, “
An experimental unification of reservoir computing methods
,”
Neural Networks
20
,
391
403
(
2007
).
171.
M.
Inubushi
and
K.
Yoshimura
, “
Reservoir computing beyond memory-nonlinearity trade-off
,”
Sci. Rep.
7
,
10199
(
2017
).
172.
X. Z.
Yu
,
N.
Kanazawa
,
W. Z.
Zhang
et al, “
Skyrmion flow near room temperature in an ultralow current density
,”
Nat. Commun.
3
,
988
(
2012
).
173.
K.
Litzius
,
J.
Leliaert
,
P.
Bassirian
et al, “
The role of temperature and drive current in skyrmion dynamics
,”
Nat. Electron.
3
,
30
36
(
2020
).
174.
K.
Litzius
,
I.
Lemesh
,
B.
Krüger
et al, “
Skyrmion Hall effect revealed by direct time-resolved X-ray microscopy
,”
Nat. Phys.
13
,
170
175
(
2017
).
175.
Z.
Tong
and
G.
Tanaka
, “
Reservoir computing with untrained convolutional neural networks for image recognition
,” in
Proceedings of the 2018 24th International Conference on Pattern Recognition (ICPR)
(
IEEE
,
2018
), pp.
1289
1294
.
Published open access through an agreement withTechnische Informationsbibliothek