Active mode-locking (ML) is an important technique in laser science, which greatly shortens the laser pulse. Here, we construct an anti-parity-time (anti-PT) symmetric Su–Schrieffer–Heeger frequency lattice by two ring resonators with antisymmetric amplitude (AM) modulations. We find that the temporal width of the generated pulse can be greatly shortened by the phase-mismatching of the AM modulations. In addition, the pulse shortening shows extremely high sensitivity to the phase transition point, at which the anti-PT symmetry of the system is completely broken. This work exploits the concept of anti-PT symmetry in a laser field to realize ML, and will have broad application prospects in ultrafast spectroscopy and ultra-high sensitive sensors.

In real life, physical systems always exchange energy with surrounding environments, which can be described by a non-Hermitian Hamiltonian.1–7 Recently, the exotic phenomena in the non-Hermitian physics with parity-time (PT) symmetry,4,8–10 anti-parity-time (anti-PT) symmetry,11–15 and non-Hermitian skin effect (NHSE)5,16,17 have attracted intense interest. The most special feature for the PT and anti-PT symmetric systems is that they can possess real eigenvalues, in the cases of the PT symmetry maintained and the anti-PT symmetry broken, despite they are non-Hermitian systems. The eigenvalues and the eigenmodes of the systems will be coalesce at their exceptional points (EPs).10,11,18 After the phase transition with an EP, the band structures of the PT and anti-PT symmetric systems will show time-windows with gain, which indicates their abilities to generate a short pulse.19–22 In addition, thanks for the sensitivity of the EPs, the systems with PT and anti-PT symmetry have application prospects for sensors with ultrahigh sensitivity.23–25 

In the last few decades, the concept of the synthetic dimensions has been a versatile platform for the studies of the physical system with a complex structure such as non-Hermitian topological photonics.26–28 The ring resonator with dynamic modulation will make the resonant frequency modes coupled and form a virtual frequency dimension.26,29,30 The previous works have applied the dynamic modulated ring resonator to the actively mode-locked system, which have shown that the PT phase transition can be used to shorten the pulse width of a laser,31 and a turbulent behavior of the laser pulse emission will take place when the PT symmetry is broken.32 For an anti-PT symmetric system, the existence of a time-window with gain also suggests its potential applications in mode-locking (ML), which will generate ultrashort pulses and will have major applications in ultrafast science such as ultrafast spectroscopy and high-speed optical communications.

Here, we construct an anti-PT symmetric Su–Schrieffer–Heeger (SSH) lattice in the frequency dimension based on two ring resonators with antisymmetric amplitude (AM) dynamic modulations. The energy band of the anti-PT symmetric system can be flexibly controlled by the forms of the applied AM modulations. That is to say, the time-window with gain of the anti-PT symmetric double-ring system can be adjusted conveniently to generate ultra-short pulses and realize active ML. Moreover, the shortening of the pulse shows extremely high sensitivity in the vicinity of the phase transition point at which the anti-PT symmetry of the system is completely broken.

In order to construct an anti-PT symmetric system, two ring resonators with antisymmetric AM modulations are mutually coupled, as shown in Fig. 1(a). The two rings are designed to have the same length; thus, they support a series of discrete frequency modes (ωn=ω0+nΩ) with the same free spectral range (FSR) Ω=2πvg/L, where vg and L are the group velocity of light and the length of the ring, respectively. In an experiment, the AM modulation can be achieved by an AM modulator with period-modulated loss along with an amplifier with constant gain over time.29 Here, the dynamic modulations applied to each ring have opposite phase-mismatching and are in the following forms:
JA(t)=JB(t)=i2J1cos[(2κ+2δ)t]i2J2cos[(Ω2κ2δ)t],
(1)
where J1 and J2 are the modulated amplitudes. κ and δ are the coupling strength between the two rings and the phase-mismatching of the modulations, respectively. As the two rings are mutually coupled, the resonant frequency ωn of the two rings hybridizes into symmetric (ωn+=ωn+κωam) and antisymmetric (ωn=ωnκωbm) supermodes, respectively. Then the applied antisymmetric AM dynamic modulations will make the frequency sites to be coupled, and a frequency lattice will be formed. Here, we ignore the group velocity dispersion and apply the representation transformation and rotation wave approximation to the coupled mode equations of the double-ring system. The corresponding dynamics of the system in the frequency domain is described as30,33
iTRddTam(T)=δam(T)+iJ1bm(T)+iJ2bm+1(T),
(2)
iTRddTbm(T)=δbm(T)+iJ1am(T)+iJ2am1(T),
(3)
where am and bm correspond to the amplitudes of the m-th symmetric and antisymmetric supermodes, respectively. TR=2π/Ω is the round trip time. T is the slow time variable, which labels the number of round trips that the pulse goes through. Equations (2) and (3) indicate that the symmetric (am) and antisymmetric (bm) supermodes in the frequency dimension form a strip with nonuniform alternating spacing 2κ and Ω2κ. In addition, the phase-mismatching of the AM modulations makes the two sites in a unit cell to have the opposite on-site potentials δ, as described in Fig. 1(b). The detailed derivations for the anti-PT symmetric SSH frequency lattice and the validity of the tight-binding model with the rotating wave approximation (RWA) are shown in the supplementary material. Therefore, a non-Hermitian SSH lattice with alternating imaginary coupling strengths is obtained in the frequency dimension, and the couplings and the on-site potentials can be controlled by the modulated amplitudes flexibly.
FIG. 1.

(a) Two ring resonators with antisymmetric AM dynamic modulations are mutually coupled with a strength of κ. (b) When the two ring are coupled, the resonant frequency modes of the system form an anti-PT symmetric SSH lattice with nonuniform alternating spacing 2κ and Ω2κ and opposite on-site potentials δ.

FIG. 1.

(a) Two ring resonators with antisymmetric AM dynamic modulations are mutually coupled with a strength of κ. (b) When the two ring are coupled, the resonant frequency modes of the system form an anti-PT symmetric SSH lattice with nonuniform alternating spacing 2κ and Ω2κ and opposite on-site potentials δ.

Close modal
To explore the active ML of the anti-PT symmetric system, we transform the frequency domain to the time domain by expanding the electric field amplitude ΨA(T,t) and ΨB(T,t) by ΨA(T,t)=mam(T)eimΩt and ΨB(T,t)=mbm(T)eimΩt, where t is the fast time variable that varies over the cavity round trip interval (TR/2t<TR/2). Then, the dynamics of the double-ring system in the time domain can be transformed from Eqs. (2) and (3) as
iTRddT(ΨA(T,t)ΨB(T,t))=H(t)(ΨA(T,t)ΨB(T,t)),
(4)
H(t)=(δiJ1+iJ2eiΩtiJ1+iJ2eiΩtδ).
(5)
The Hamiltonian H(t) is anti-PT symmetric, i.e., (PT)H=H(PT), where the parity operator P is defined as PH(t)P1=σxH(t)σx (σx is the Pauli matrix), and the time-reversal operator T is defined as TH(t)T1=H*(t).14,34 The Bloch momentum of the anti-PT symmetric system is represented by t.
Moreover, from Eq. (5), we can know that the anti-PT symmetric system has frequency mode translation symmetry and time translation symmetry along the frequency axis [ H(t)=H(t+TR)].35 Thus, we are able to define the energy band of the double-ring system by the eigenvalues λ±. By analogy with the crystal lattice of a solid, the band energy of the above anti-PT symmetric double-ring system is expressed as
λ±=±δ2J12J222J1J2cos(Ωt).
(6)
Here, Ωt is equal to the wavevector along the frequency axis. Equation (6) suggests that the band structure of the system has relationship with the phase-mismatching δ, and the point of δ=J2+J1 is the phase transition point for the completely broken of the anti-PT symmetric system. In addition, the δ=J2+J1 is also a transition point for vanishing of the time-window of gain. Therefore, we pay close attention to the evolution of the band structure for various values of δ around J2+J1. For intuition, the real and imaginary parts of λ± for various δ values are plotted in Figs. 2(a) and 2(b), respectively. We can see that when δJ2J1 (marked by red dot), the eigenvalues of the system are pure imaginary, meaning that the anti-PT symmetry is kept for all t. In this case, the anti-PT symmetric double-ring system exhibits a time-window of gain for the whole of the band structure. As δ increases and is above J2J1, the anti-PT symmetry will be partly broken at Ωt=±π. As shown in Fig. 2(c), when δ=0.9(J2+J1)>J2J1, the band structure of the anti-PT symmetric system is complex and displays a time-window with gain with the center of Ωt=0. When δ is in close proximity to J2+J1 [Fig. 2(d)], the time-window with gain gets very narrow, indicating the arising of pulse shortening. The narrowing of the time-window with gain will continue until δ=J2+J1 [marked by red dot in Figs. 2(a) and 2(b)]. Once the value of δ is above J2+J1, the anti-PT-symmetry is completely broken for all t, and the eigenvalues become real. In this situation, the time-windows for gain and loss are disappeared, and the further increasing of δ will widen the bandgap of the anti-PT symmetric system, as shown in Figs. 2(e) and 2(f). In conclusion, by adjusting the phase-mismatching δ, the band structure of the anti-PT symmetric system can be controlled flexibly, which indicates the regulation of the ML in the double-ring system.
FIG. 2.

Real (a) and imaginary (b) parts of eigenvalues λ± for various values of δ. The red dot and black dot mark the parameters for δ=J2J1 and δ=J2+J1, respectively. Real (blue) and imaginary (red) parts of eigenvalues λ± for δ=0.9(J2+J1) (c), δ=0.999(J2+J1) (d), δ=1.005(J2+J1) (e), and δ=1.1(J2+J1) (f). The parameter values used are J1=0.1 and J2=0.05.

FIG. 2.

Real (a) and imaginary (b) parts of eigenvalues λ± for various values of δ. The red dot and black dot mark the parameters for δ=J2J1 and δ=J2+J1, respectively. Real (blue) and imaginary (red) parts of eigenvalues λ± for δ=0.9(J2+J1) (c), δ=0.999(J2+J1) (d), δ=1.005(J2+J1) (e), and δ=1.1(J2+J1) (f). The parameter values used are J1=0.1 and J2=0.05.

Close modal
As mentioned above, the existence of a time-window with gain suggests the ability of the anti-PT symmetric system to realize ML. To confirm that, we provide a direct calculation for the pulse width and saturated gain of the anti-PT symmetric double-ring system. The dynamics of the pulse envelope circulating in the double-ring system at successive round trips is given by the master equation19,32,36
TRTΦ(T,t)=(gl+gΩg22t2)Φ(T,t)iH(t)Φ(T,t),
(7)
where Φ(T,t)=(ΨA(T,t)ΨB(T,t)) and g and l are the saturated gain and loss per transit in the rings, respectively. H(t) is the anti-PT symmetric Hamiltonian defined in Eq. (5). Ωg is the gain bandwidth of the rings. For a slow-gain medium, saturated gain g obeys the rate equation dgdT=γ(gg0+gP), where g0 is the small-signal gain from pumping, γ=TR/τ is the ratio between cavity transit time TR and upper laser level lifetime τ (τTR), and P=1TRTRTRdt|Φ(T,t)2| is the average laser power normalized to the saturation power.
In the case of δ<J2+J1, the time window with gain for the anti-PT symmetric double-ring system is centered at Ωt=0, as shown in Figs. 2(c) and 2(d). Therefore, we focus on the analysis in the vicinity of Ωt=0. In addition, the eigenvalues λ± near Ωt=0 have two components, which are corresponding to the time-windows for gain and loss, respectively. As a result, the steady state of the anti-PT symmetric system will be dominated by the component, which experiences gain, as the component with loss will decay as the evolution over time. Thus, we perform a Taylor expansion near Ωt=0 and obtain the pulse evolution equation as
TRTΨ(T,t)=[gl+gΩg22t2+δ2+(J1+J1)2]Ψ(T,t)[J1J12δ2+(J1+J1)2Ω2t2]Ψ(T,t).
(8)
The steady solution of Eq. (8) is a Gaussian of the form of Ψ(T,t)=et2/2ΔtAPT2, and the calculated saturated gain is
gs=lδ2+(J1+J2)2+gsΩg2[J1J2Ωg2Ω22gsδ2+(J1+J2)2]1/2,
(9)
which indicates that the saturated gain is directly proportional to the value of phase-mismatching δ for the regime of δ<J2+J1. The corresponding pulse width is
ΔtAPT=[2gsδ2+(J1+J2)2J1J2Ωg2Ω2]1/4.
(10)
Equation (10) suggests that the width of the pulse will be greatly shortened as the value of δ is close to J1+J2, which agrees with the narrowed time-window for gain with the center of Ωt=0 in Fig. 2. To demonstrate that, we checked the theoretical analysis by numerical simulations with the initial condition of small random amplitude of the intracavity field Ψ(0,t) at the initial round trip. As shown in Fig. 3(a), for δ=0.9(J2+J1), the numerically computed evolution of the normalized pulse intensity in Eq. (7) is centered at Ωt=0, just meeting with our expectation. As the value of δ increases and is close to (J1+J2), the pulse width ΔtAPT becomes quite narrow [Fig. 3(b)], corresponding to the narrowed time-window for gain in Fig. 2(d). Therefore, the output pulses generated by the double-ring system are greatly shortened with increasing phase-mismatching δ in the case of δ<J1+J2. To make sure that the numerically computed results under the RWA are valid, we show the corresponding numerically computed evolutions for the full time-dependent dynamical equations in the supplementary material, which are consistent with the evolutions in Fig. 3.
FIG. 3.

Numerically computed evolution of the normalized pulse intensity for the tight-binding model with the RWA. (a) δ=0.9(J2+J1), (b) δ=0.999(J2+J1), (c) δ=1.005(J2+J1), and (d) δ=1.1(J2+J1). The parameter values used for the simulations are γ=103, l = 0.5, g0=0.5,J1=0.1,J2/J1=0.5,J1/κ=0.05,andΩg/Ω=200.

FIG. 3.

Numerically computed evolution of the normalized pulse intensity for the tight-binding model with the RWA. (a) δ=0.9(J2+J1), (b) δ=0.999(J2+J1), (c) δ=1.005(J2+J1), and (d) δ=1.1(J2+J1). The parameter values used for the simulations are γ=103, l = 0.5, g0=0.5,J1=0.1,J2/J1=0.5,J1/κ=0.05,andΩg/Ω=200.

Close modal
When δJ1+J2, the anti-PT symmetry is completely broken for all t in the anti-PT symmetric system. In this regime, active ML also occurs due to the effective phase modulation introduced by the modulators.37 In this case, the ML will take place at Ωt=0 and ±π. Here, we focus on the analysis in the vicinity of Ωt=0 and π, as the solution near Ωt=π is similar to that for Ωt=π. Thus, the steady-state solutions are still a Gaussian and in the forms of Ψ(T,t)=e(1+i)t2/2ΔtAPT2 and Ψ(T,t)=e(1+i)(tTR/2)2/2ΔtAPT2 for Ωt=0 and π, respectively. By performing a Taylor expansion near Ωt=0 and π, we obtain the saturated gains for the two cases as
gs0=l+gsΩg2[J1J2Ωg2Ω24gsδ2(J2+J1)2]1/2,
(11)
gsπ=l+gsΩg2[J1J2Ωg2Ω24gsδ2(J2J1)2]1/2,
(12)
respectively. Since ΩgΩ, the second terms are negligible. Thus, the saturated gains gs0 and gsπ are approximately equal to the loss l. The corresponding pulse widths for Ωt=0 and π are
ΔtAPT0=[4gsδ2(J2+J1)2J1J2Ωg2Ω2]1/4,
(13)
ΔtAPTπ=[4gsδ2(J2J1)2J1J2Ωg2Ω2]1/4,
(14)
respectively. Equations (13) and (14) indicate that the further increasing of δ will increase the pulse widths for both two cases, and the pulse width for Ωt=0 is narrower than that for Ωt=π. In addition, Eq. (14) suggests that the pulse can be greatly shortened at the phase transition point of δ=(J2J1) for Ωt=π. However, from the band energy in Fig. 2, we can know that the broad time-window with gain will make the energy of the light for Ωt=π to be obscured by the larger gain near Ωt=0. Figure 3(c) shows the numerically computed evolution of the normalized pulse intensity for δ=1.005(J1+J2), and the pulse centered at Ωt=0 is much narrower than that for Ωt=π. When δ=1.1(J1+J2), the corresponding pulse width near Ωt=0 gets wider, as shown in Fig. 3(d), in agreement with our predictions. The corresponding numerically computed evolutions for the full time-dependent dynamical equations are also shown in the supplementary material.

Moreover, we plot the pulse width parameter ΔtAPT and the saturated gain gs for the anti-PT symmetric coupled-ring system, as the value of δ changes from 0 to 2(J1+J2). In Fig. 4, gs and ΔtAPT are normalized to the corresponding values for δ = 0. In the regime of δJ1+J2, the analytical solution for Eq. (10) [blue solid curve in Fig. 4(a)] exhibits a narrowing of the temporal width of the pulse with the increasing of δ, which agrees well with the numerical simulation results for ΔtAPT (marked by red circle). We can notice that the analytical solutions of the ΔtAPT for Ωt=π are disappeared as δJ1+J2, which is because that the time-window with gain makes the energy of the light for Ωt=π to be obscured by the larger gain. Meanwhile, the numerical simulation results show that the saturated gain increases gradually with δ and are consistent with the calculated gs in Eq. (9), as shown for the regime of δJ1+J2 in Fig. 4(b). The narrowing of the pulse and the increasing of the saturated gain simultaneously end when the value of δ is larger than J1+J2. The calculated pulse width parameters ΔtAPT for δJ1+J2 in Eqs. (13) and (14) are plotted in Fig. 4(a) and show that the further increasing of δ broadens the width of the pulse. In addition, the pulse width in the vicinity of Ωt=0 [green solid curve in Fig. 4(a)] displays a great shortening as δ is approaching to J1+J2, and is much narrower than that for Ωt=π [black solid curve in Fig. 4(a)]. Therefore, the temporal width of the pulse generated by the double-ring system is sensitive to the phase transition point of δ=J1+J2, at which the anti-PT symmetry of the system is completely broken, while the saturated gain for the regime of δJ1+J2 is almost constant, in accordance with the analytic theories for Eqs. (11) and (12). Moreover, the numerical simulation results for δ>J1+J2 (red circle) are still in agreement with our theoretical analysis. Thus, we can conclude that our analytic theory can well describe the active ML of the anti-PT symmetric double-ring system. In addition, the output pulses experience a great shortening in the vicinity of the phase transition point for the completely anti-PT symmetry broken, which shows high sensitivity and suggests the application in the sensitive sensor.

FIG. 4.

Compare analytical solutions for (a) ΔtAPT and (b) gs to the numerical simulation results, as δ changes from 0 to 2(J1+J2). Blue solid curve labels the solutions for Eqs. (9) and (10), green solid curve labels the solutions for Eqs. (11) and (13), black solid curve labels the solutions for Eqs. (12) and (14), and the numerical simulation results are marked by red circle.

FIG. 4.

Compare analytical solutions for (a) ΔtAPT and (b) gs to the numerical simulation results, as δ changes from 0 to 2(J1+J2). Blue solid curve labels the solutions for Eqs. (9) and (10), green solid curve labels the solutions for Eqs. (11) and (13), black solid curve labels the solutions for Eqs. (12) and (14), and the numerical simulation results are marked by red circle.

Close modal

In summary, we constructed an anti-PT symmetric SSH lattice in the frequency dimension based on a double-ring system with the antisymmetric AM dynamic modulations. In the time domain, the time-window with gain of the anti-PT symmetric system can be controlled by the phase-mismatching of the AM modulations, which is flexibly and conveniently able to be used to shorten the temporal width of the pulse. In addition, the shortening of the pulse is highly sensitive to the phase transition point, at which the anti-PT symmetry is completely broken. This work exploits the concept of anti-PT symmetry in lasing systems to realize the active ML and shows broad application prospects in ultrafast spectroscopy and ultra-high sensitive sensors. Additionally, this work provides a convenient way to construct various non-Hermitian topological insolators in the synthetic frequency dimension, which is difficult to be realized in realistic systems. Then, we can expect to explore the interesting physical phenomenon of the synthetic non-Hermitian topological lattices in further studies.

See the supplementary material for the detailed derivations of the anti-PT symmetric SSH frequency lattice, the validity of the tight-binding model with RWA, and the numerically computed evolutions for the full time-dependent dynamical equations.

This work was supported by the Natural Science Foundation of Zhejiang Province, China (Grant No. LQ23A040001), the general project of Zhejiang Provincial Education Department (No. Y202146469), and the Open Foundation Project of Hubei Provincial Key Laboratory of Optical Information and Pattern Recognition, Wuhan Institute of Technology (No. 202203).

The authors have no conflicts to disclose.

Yiling Song: Conceptualization (lead); Formal analysis (lead); Funding acquisition (lead); Investigation (lead); Software (equal); Writing – original draft (lead); Writing – review & editing (lead). Shaolin Ke: Funding acquisition (supporting); Investigation (supporting). Yuelan Chen: Investigation (supporting). Mingfeng Wang: Investigation (supporting); Project administration (supporting).

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

1.
Q.
Lin
,
T.
Li
,
L.
Xiao
,
K.
Wang
,
W.
Yi
, and
P.
Xue
, “
Observation of non-Hermitian topological Anderson insulator in quantum dynamics
,”
Nat. Commun.
13
,
3229
(
2022
).
2.
B.
Hockendorf
,
A.
Alvermann
, and
H.
Fehske
, “
Non-Hermitian boundary state engineering in anomalous floquet topological insulators
,”
Phys. Rev. Lett.
123
,
190403
(
2019
).
3.
R.
Su
,
S.
Ghosh
,
T. C. H.
Liew
, and
Q.
Xiong
, “
Optical switching of topological phase in a perovskite polariton lattice
,”
Sci. Adv.
7
,
eabf8049
(
2021
).
4.
S.
Xia
,
D.
Kaltsas
,
D.
Song
,
I.
Komis
,
J.
Xu
,
A.
Szameit
,
H.
Buljan
,
K. G.
Makris
, and
Z.
Chen
, “
Nonlinear tuning of PT symmetry and non-Hermitian topological states
,”
Science
372
,
72
76
(
2021
).
5.
W.
Cheng
and
G.
Hu
, “
Acoustic skin effect with non-reciprocal Willis materials
,”
Appl. Phys. Lett.
121
,
041701
(
2022
).
6.
K.
Stojanoska
and
C.
Shen
, “
Non-Hermitian planar elastic metasurface for unidirectional focusing of flexural waves
,”
Appl. Phys. Lett.
120
,
241701
(
2022
).
7.
F.
Gao
,
Z.
Sun
,
P.
Yuan
,
J.
Deng
,
G.
Jin
,
J.
Zhou
,
H.
Liu
, and
B.
Yan
, “
Polarization-dependent unidirectional reflectionless in non-Hermitian metasurface and its application in near-field grayscale imaging
,”
Appl. Phys. Lett.
121
,
091701
(
2022
).
8.
H.
Nasari
,
G.
Lopez-Galmiche
,
H. E.
Lopez-Aviles
,
A.
Schumer
,
A. U.
Hassan
,
Q.
Zhong
,
S.
Rotter
,
P.
LiKamWa
,
D. N.
Christodoulides
, and
M.
Khajavikhan
, “
Observation of chiral state transfer without encircling an exceptional point
,”
Nature
605
,
256
261
(
2022
).
9.
Z.
Dai
,
Z.
Wang
, and
J.
Yao
, “
Dual-loop parity-time symmetric system with a rational loop length ratio
,”
Opt. Lett.
48
,
143
146
(
2023
).
10.
R.
Kononchuk
,
J.
Cai
,
F.
Ellis
,
R.
Thevamaran
, and
T.
Kottos
, “
Exceptional-point-based accelerometers with enhanced signal-to-noise ratio
,”
Nature
607
,
697
702
(
2022
).
11.
A.
Bergman
,
R.
Duggan
,
K.
Sharma
,
M.
Tur
,
A.
Zadok
, and
A.
Alu
, “
Observation of anti-parity-time-symmetry, phase transitions and exceptional points in an optical fibre
,”
Nat. Commun.
12
,
486
(
2021
).
12.
H. C.
Wu
,
L.
Jin
, and
Z.
Song
, “
Topology of an anti-parity-time symmetric non-Hermitian Su–Schrieffer–Heeger model
,”
Phys. Rev. B
103
,
235110
(
2021
).
13.
S.
Ke
,
D.
Zhao
,
J.
Liu
,
Q.
Liu
,
Q.
Liao
,
B.
Wang
, and
P.
Lu
, “
Topological bound modes in anti-PT-symmetric optical waveguide arrays
,”
Opt. Express
27
,
13858
(
2019
).
14.
F.
Zhang
,
Y.
Feng
,
X.
Chen
,
L.
Ge
, and
W.
Wan
, “
Synthetic anti-PT symmetry in a single microcavity
,”
Phys. Rev. Lett.
124
,
053901
(
2020
).
15.
P.
Peng
,
W.
Cao
,
C.
Shen
,
W.
Qu
,
J.
Wen
,
L.
Jiang
, and
Y.
Xiao
, “
Anti-parity–time symmetry with flying atoms
,”
Nat. Phys.
12
,
1139
1145
(
2016
).
16.
L.
Li
,
C. H.
Lee
,
S.
Mu
, and
J.
Gong
, “
Critical non-Hermitian skin effect
,”
Nat. Commun.
11
,
5491
(
2020
).
17.
Y.
Song
,
W.
Liu
,
L.
Zheng
,
Y.
Zhang
,
B.
Wang
, and
P.
Lu
, “
Two-dimensional non-Hermitian skin effect in a synthetic photonic lattice
,”
Phys. Rev. Appl.
14
,
064076
(
2020
).
18.
H.
Zhang
,
R.
Huang
,
S.
Zhang
,
Y.
Li
,
C.
Qiu
,
F.
Nori
, and
H.
Jing
, “
Anti-PT symmetry by spinning a resonator
,”
Nano Lett.
20
,
7594
7599
(
2020
).
19.
H. A.
Haus
, “
Mode-locking of lasers
,”
IEEE J. Sel. Top. Quantum Electron.
6
,
1173
1185
(
2000
).
20.
H. A.
Haus
, “
A theory of forced mode locking
,”
IEEE J. Quantum Electron.
11
,
323
330
(
1975
).
21.
J.
Peng
,
S.
Boscolo
,
Z.
Zhao
, and
H.
Zeng
, “
Breathing dissipative solitons in mode-locked fiber lasers
,”
Sci. Adv.
5
,
eaax1110
(
2019
).
22.
D. R.
Carlson
,
D. D.
Hickstein
,
W.
Zhang
,
A. J.
Metcalf
,
F.
Quinlan
,
S. A.
Diddams
, and
S. B.
Papp
, “
Ultrafast electro-optic light with subcycle control
,”
Science
361
,
1358
1363
(
2018
).
23.
H.
Hodaei
,
A. U.
Hassan
,
S.
Wittek
,
H.
Garcia-Gracia
,
R.
El-Ganainy
,
D. N.
Christodoulides
, and
M.
Khajavikhan
, “
Enhanced sensitivity at higher-order exceptional points
,”
Nature
548
,
187
191
(
2017
).
24.
X.
Shu
,
A.
Li
,
G.
Hu
,
J.
Wang
,
A.
Alu
, and
L.
Chen
, “
Fast encirclement of an exceptional point for highly efficient and compact chiral mode converters
,”
Nat. Commun.
13
,
2123
(
2022
).
25.
M.
De Carlo
,
F.
De Leonardis
,
L.
Lamberti
, and
V. M. N.
Passaro
, “
High-sensitivity real-splitting anti-PT-symmetric microscale optical gyroscope
,”
Opt. Lett.
44
,
3956
3959
(
2019
).
26.
A.
Dutt
,
L.
Yuan
,
K. Y.
Yang
,
K.
Wang
,
S.
Buddhiraju
,
J.
Vučković
, and
S.
Fan
, “
Creating boundaries along a synthetic frequency dimension
,”
Nat. Commun.
13
,
3377
(
2022
).
27.
L.
Xiao
,
T.
Deng
,
K.
Wang
,
G.
Zhu
,
Z.
Wang
,
W.
Yi
, and
P.
Xue
, “
Non-Hermitian bulk–boundary correspondence in quantum dynamics
,”
Nat. Phys.
16
,
761
766
(
2020
).
28.
S.
Weidemann
,
M.
Kremer
,
S.
Longhi
, and
A.
Szameit
, “
Topological triple phase transition in non-Hermitian Floquet quasicrystals
,”
Nature
601
,
354
359
(
2022
).
29.
K.
Wang
,
A.
Dutt
,
K. Y.
Yang
,
C. C.
Wojcik
,
J.
Vuckovic
, and
S.
Fan
, “
Generating arbitrary topological windings of a non-Hermitian band
,”
Science
371
,
1240
1245
(
2021
).
30.
Y.
Song
,
Y.
Chen
,
W.
Xiong
, and
M.
Wang
, “
Flexible light manipulation in non-Hermitian frequency Su–Schrieffer–Heeger lattice
,”
Opt. Lett.
47
,
1646
1649
(
2022
).
31.
L.
Yuan
,
Q.
Lin
,
M.
Xiao
,
A.
Dutt
, and
S.
Fan
, “
Pulse shortening in an actively mode-locked laser with parity-time symmetry
,”
APL Photonics
3
,
086103
(
2018
).
32.
S.
Longhi
, “
PT-symmetric mode-locking
,”
Opt. Lett.
41
,
4518
4521
(
2016
).
33.
A.
Dutt
,
M.
Minkov
,
I. A. D.
Williamson
, and
S.
Fan
, “
Higher-order topological insulators in synthetic dimensions
,”
Light: Sci. Appl.
9
,
131
(
2020
).
34.
M.
Maamache
,
S.
Lamri
, and
O.
Cherbal
, “
PT-symmetry in time periodic non-Hermitian Hamiltonians systems
,”
Ann. Phys.
378
,
150
161
(
2017
).
35.
A.
Dutt
,
M.
Minkov
,
Q.
Lin
,
L.
Yuan
,
D. A. B.
Miller
, and
S.
Fan
, “
Experimental band structure spectroscopy along a synthetic dimension
,”
Nat. Commun.
10
,
3122
(
2019
).
36.
A. M.
Dunlop
,
W. J.
Firth
, and
E. M.
Wright
, “
Time-domain master equation for pulse evolution and laser mode-locking
,”
Opt. Quantum Electron.
32
,
1131
1146
(
2000
).
37.
R.
Nagar
,
D.
Abraham
, and
G.
Eisenstein
, “
Pure phase-modulation mode locking in semiconductor lasers
,”
Opt. Lett.
17
,
1119
1121
(
1992
).

Supplementary Material