A fingerprint reader based on epitaxial PbTiO3 (PTO) transducer array operating thickness extensional mode in GHz range was fabricated. The device consisted of nine square transducers with 0.1 mm per side arranged 1.3 mm apart in a 3 × 3 array. Minimum conversion loss of the fabricated transducer was 2.5 dB at 0.8 GHz, and electromechanical coupling coefficient kt2 was estimated to be 28.9%. In contrast to MHz range ultrasonic fingerprint readers such as those based on piezoelectric micromachined ultrasonic transducers using a piezoelectric transducer and ScAlN, a GHz range transducer enables imaging in higher spatial resolution. Furthermore, PTO transducers have a high dielectric constant and electromechanical coupling coefficient kt2. A high dielectric constant realizes 50 Ω impedance matching with small electrode area. The small acoustic source is expected to improve the spatial resolution of a fingerprint reader. We achieved the fingerprint imaging by evaluating the acoustic reflectance of the medium/transducer interface. Furthermore, piezostage that allows mechanical movement in the 100 nm order was introduced to image a 12 × 12 μm2 area with total of 3600 data points.

Fingerprint readers based on piezoelectric transducer (PZT) and ScAlN as piezoelectric micromachined ultrasonic transducers (pMUTs) in the MHz range have been extensively studied.1–3 The pMUTs enable efficient radiation of sound waves to a low acoustic impedance medium such as air and water by lowering the spring constant owing to its flexure mode of self-standing structure. However, because of the flexure mode, operating frequency of pMUTs is limited to several tens of MHz at most.

On the other hand, it is difficult to match a thickness extensional mode piezoelectric thin-film transducer to a medium with low acoustic impedance. However, fingerprint imaging is possible by evaluating the acoustic reflectance of the medium/transducer interface. Above all, spatial resolution can dramatically improve by using GHz ultrasonic waves in the thickness extensional mode. There has been a report on fingerprint imaging by the acoustic reflectance of the backside of the thickness extensional mode AlN transducer substrate.4Table I shows the comparison of acoustic fingerprint sensors.

TABLE I.

Comparison of acoustic fingerprint sensors.

MethodMaterialFrequency (MHz)Reference
High overtone mode bulk acoustic resonator (HBAR) PbTiO3 (PTO) 800 This study 
pMUT AlN 30 1  
pMUT PZT 6–8 2  
HBAR AlN 1300 4  
cMUT Si3N4 12 10  
MethodMaterialFrequency (MHz)Reference
High overtone mode bulk acoustic resonator (HBAR) PbTiO3 (PTO) 800 This study 
pMUT AlN 30 1  
pMUT PZT 6–8 2  
HBAR AlN 1300 4  
cMUT Si3N4 12 10  

In order to efficiently input power to a transducer, it is crucial to match the electrical impedance of the transducer and a measurement system. The capacitive impedance of a piezoelectric transducer is expressed by the following equation:

Z=1ωC=1ωεSd=dωεS,
(1)

where ω is thickness extensional mode resonant frequency, ε is dielectric constant of piezoelectric material, S is area of top electrode, and d is thickness of piezoelectric film.

Large electrode area of the transducer is required to match the electrical impedance of a piezoelectric material, for example, with 50 Ω measurement system. However, to achieve high spatial resolution, the area of electrode should be minimized. In fact, the relative dielectric constant εr33 of AlN is approximately 10, while that of PbTiO3 is as high as 82. In the theoretical simulation, when the insertion loss of PbTiO3 and AlN transducers are adjusted to be the same, the electrode size of PTO transducer of 0.17 mm2 is 4.4 times smaller than that of AlN transducer of 0.039 mm2. Therefore, by employing PbTiO3, further improvement of spatial resolution is expected.5,6

In this study, fingerprint imaging using a device with nine arrayed PbTiO3 transducers was conducted. To investigate the improvement of spatial resolution by GHz range transducer, piezostage that allow mechanical movement in the 100 nm order was introduced. Fingerprint was imaged by acoustic characteristics measured using a network analyzer. The voltage sensitivity of a network analyzer reaches about 1 μV, which is 1000 times as higher than the voltage sensitivity of an oscilloscope of 1 mV. We here propose fingerprint images with high signal-to-noise ratio (S/N ratio) using a network analyzer.

PbTiO3 epitaxial films were grown on a conductive La-SrTiO3 single crystal substrate with 0.3 mm thickness by RF magnetron sputtering. When conducting the measurement, the 0.6 mm round trip distance in the substrate may degrade the resolution of the image due to the diffraction effect. However, the 0.3-mm-thick substrate was employed to certainly avoid mechanical cracking of the substrate when the transducer is pressed on the phantom. The crystal orientation of La-SrTiO3 was (100), and La concentration of the conductive La-SrTiO3 single crystal was 3.73 wt. %. Conductive La-SrTiO3 was adopted as a substrate because of its close lattice parameter to PbTiO3. The crystalline orientation of the PbTiO3 film was examined by x-ray diffraction (PANalytical, X'pert pro). PbTiO3 (002) peaks were observed in 2θ-ω XRD patterns, and the typical FWHM of ω scan PbTiO3 (002) rocking curves were 0.2°.

Electromechanical coupling coefficient kt2 of PbTiO3 epitaxial transducers was estimated from longitudinal wave conversion loss curves. Conversion loss of the transducer was obtained by inverse Fourier transform of the detected ultrasonic echo signals in the time domain analysis using a network analyzer (Keysight Technologies, E5071C). Electromechanical coupling coefficient kt2 was determined by comparing experimental conversion loss curves and theoretical conversion loss curves by the Mason's equivalent circuit model7–9 (see Fig. 1). The constants used in the model are as indicated in Table II. Minimum conversion loss was 2.5 dB at 0.8 GHz. The theoretical curves agreed well with the experimental curves. Electromechanical coupling coefficient kt2 of PbTiO3 transducer was estimated to be 28.9%.

FIG. 1.

Conversion loss of PbTiO3 epitaxial film transducers.

FIG. 1.

Conversion loss of PbTiO3 epitaxial film transducers.

Close modal
TABLE II.

Constants used in the Mason's equivalent circuit model.

Piezoelectric film (001) PbTiO3 
ρpiezo (kg/m37750 
Vpiezo (m/s) 4220 
dpiezo (μm) 6.8 
εr33 42 
Substrate (100) La-SrTiO3 
ρsub (kg/m35120 
Vsub (m/s) 7672 
dsub (μm) 300 
Top electrode Ni 
ρtop (kg/m38910 
Vtop (m/s) 5600 
dtop (μm) 0.05 
Phantom Elastomer 
ρelastomer (kg/m31000 
Velastomer (m/s) 1670 
Piezoelectric film (001) PbTiO3 
ρpiezo (kg/m37750 
Vpiezo (m/s) 4220 
dpiezo (μm) 6.8 
εr33 42 
Substrate (100) La-SrTiO3 
ρsub (kg/m35120 
Vsub (m/s) 7672 
dsub (μm) 300 
Top electrode Ni 
ρtop (kg/m38910 
Vtop (m/s) 5600 
dtop (μm) 0.05 
Phantom Elastomer 
ρelastomer (kg/m31000 
Velastomer (m/s) 1670 

The thermoelastic elastomer was adopted as a substitute for fingerprint. The acoustic impedance of elastomer is assumed to be approximately 1.67 Mrayl, where that of air is approximately 0. Thus, the difference between the acoustic impedance difference at the substrate/elastomer interface is smaller than that at the substate/air interface. The reflectance R at the interface can be calculated using the following equation:

R=Z1Z2Z1+Z22,
(2)

where Z1 is acoustic impedance of incident medium, and Z2 is acoustic impedance of reflecting medium. The reflectance of the substrate/elastomer interface was approximately 0.83, whereas that of the substrate/air interface was 1. Transducer insertion loss of PbTiO3/La-SrTiO3 with and without elastomer on the bottom side of La-SrTiO3 substrate were measured as shown in Fig. 2(a). Mason's equivalent circuit model for transducer contacting elastomer is shown in Fig. 2(b). Figure 3 shows the comparison of first echo amplitude of impulse response with and without the elastomer. Additionally, Fig. 4 shows the maximum insertion loss with and without elastomer was 60% and 55%, respectively. Figures 3 and 4 indicate degradation of insertion loss by contacting elastomer owing to the change of reflection coefficient of the substrate/elastomer interface. Consequently, the difference of the reflection coefficient with and without elastomer was confirmed.

FIG. 2.

(a) Measurement system of insertion loss with and without elastomer. (b) Mason's equivalent circuit when elastomer is in contact with the transducer.

FIG. 2.

(a) Measurement system of insertion loss with and without elastomer. (b) Mason's equivalent circuit when elastomer is in contact with the transducer.

Close modal
FIG. 3.

Comparison of amplitude with and without the elastomer.

FIG. 3.

Comparison of amplitude with and without the elastomer.

Close modal
FIG. 4.

Insertion loss with and without the elastomer.

FIG. 4.

Insertion loss with and without the elastomer.

Close modal

A schematic diagram of 3 × 3 array transducer imaging device is shown in Fig. 5. The measurement system configuration for fingerprint imaging is shown in Fig. 6. Ni top electrode was deposited on the fabricated PbTiO3 epitaxial thin film so that each PbTiO3 transducer is spaced 1.3 mm apart, as shown in Fig. 5. A stepping motor stage was used to mechanically scan a 3.9 × 3.9 mm2 area of the fingerprint phantom while pressing the fingerprint phantom onto the backside of the PbTiO3 transducer substrate. The number of mapping data points was 9801 (99 × 99 points in a 3.9 × 3.9 mm2 area). Each of the nine PbTiO3 transducer acquired an image of 1.3 × 1.3 mm2 area, and the nine images were connected to form a single fingerprint image of 3.9 × 3.9 mm2. Three network analyzers were used to perform measurement with an array of 3 × 3 transducers. However, rather than using three network analyzers, using an RF switch is more reasonable if available. The stepping motor stage and network analyzer were controlled using LabVIEW (National Instruments).

FIG. 5.

A schematic diagram of 3 × 3 array transducer imaging device. A diagram for mechanical scanning of fingerprint phantom is also described.

FIG. 5.

A schematic diagram of 3 × 3 array transducer imaging device. A diagram for mechanical scanning of fingerprint phantom is also described.

Close modal
FIG. 6.

Stepping motor XYZ stage measurement system for mechanically scanning nine PbTiO3 transducer array. (Released state of the phantom before starting measurement.)

FIG. 6.

Stepping motor XYZ stage measurement system for mechanically scanning nine PbTiO3 transducer array. (Released state of the phantom before starting measurement.)

Close modal

The longitudinal insertion loss of each transducer was measured while the fingerprint image was pressed against the backside of the transducer substrate. An impulse response was obtained by performing inverse Fourier transform on the S11 parameter. Fingerprint images were obtained by mapping the maximum value of the insertion loss of longitudinal wave and the maximum amplitude of the first echo.

Figure 7(a) shows an optical micrograph of fingerprint phantom. When mapping is conducted with raw measured values, the images obtained by the nine transducers have different darkness due to the different ultrasonic excitation efficiency of each nine transducers. Therefore, the maximum amplitude of insertion loss and impulse response of the first longitudinal wave echo when nothing is pressed on each nine transducers were measured as a reference. Figures 7(b) and 7(c) were obtained by subtracting the reference values from the raw measured values of maximum amplitude of insertion loss and impulse response of the first longitudinal wave echo, respectively. Fingerprint image was obtained by using the two methods. The image obtained using insertion loss has a wider area of light and shade. Therefore, we adopted the insertion loss method in the following investigation.

FIG. 7.

(a) Optical micrograph of the fingerprint phantom. Phantom imaged by mapping (b) maximum insertion loss and (c) the maximum first echo amplitude.

FIG. 7.

(a) Optical micrograph of the fingerprint phantom. Phantom imaged by mapping (b) maximum insertion loss and (c) the maximum first echo amplitude.

Close modal

To quantitatively examine the resolution of the proposed fingerprint reading method, the image obtained by the stepping motor stage was compared with that obtained by a piezostage. For simplicity, fingerprint image was acquired by mechanical scanning of a single PbTiO3 transducer. An elastomer phantom molded with 100 μm width ridges and 200 μm valleys was prepared as imaging object.

First, the stepping motor stage was used to mechanically scan a 180 × 180 μm2 area of the phantom. The distance between each measurement point was set to the minimum value of 2 μm. The acoustic image of phantom was obtained by mapping the maximum value of insertion loss, as shown in Fig. 8(b) at each measurement points. The number of data points for mapping was 8100 (90 × 90 points in a 180 × 180 μm2 area) for this measurement.

FIG. 8.

(a) Optical micrograph of the fingerprint phantom (180 × 180 μm2 area). (b) Phantom imaged by mapping the maximum insertion loss measured with the stepping motor stage (90 × 90 points, 180 × 180 μm2 area).

FIG. 8.

(a) Optical micrograph of the fingerprint phantom (180 × 180 μm2 area). (b) Phantom imaged by mapping the maximum insertion loss measured with the stepping motor stage (90 × 90 points, 180 × 180 μm2 area).

Close modal

Next, the same imaging process was performed with the piezostage, as shown in Fig. 9. to mechanically scan a 500 × 500 μm2 area of the phantom. Figure 10(b) was acquired to confirm that the piezostage performed the same function as the stepping motor stage. Therefore, we measured a larger area to certainly observe valleys and ridges with the piezostage measurement. The distance between each measurement point was set to 10 μm. The acoustic image of phantom was obtained by mapping the maximum value of insertion loss as shown in Fig. 10(b).

FIG. 9.

A piezostage measurement system. (Released state of the phantom before starting measurement.)

FIG. 9.

A piezostage measurement system. (Released state of the phantom before starting measurement.)

Close modal
FIG. 10.

(a) Optical micrograph of the fingerprint phantom (500 × 500 μm2 area). (b) Phantom imaged by mapping the maximum insertion loss measured with a piezostage (50 × 50 points, 500 × 500 μm2 area).

FIG. 10.

(a) Optical micrograph of the fingerprint phantom (500 × 500 μm2 area). (b) Phantom imaged by mapping the maximum insertion loss measured with a piezostage (50 × 50 points, 500 × 500 μm2 area).

Close modal

We then observed an enlarged image to evaluate the resolution. The same imaging process was performed with the piezostage. This time, the imaging area focused on the edge of the previously scanned 100 μm ridge of the phantom. A 12 × 12 μm2 area of the phantom was scanned using the piezostage. The acoustic mapping result of the maximum value of insertion loss is shown in Fig. 11(b).

FIG. 11.

(a) Optical micrograph of the fingerprint phantom (12 × 12 μm2 area). (b) Phantom imaged by mapping the maximum insertion loss measured with a piezostage (60 × 60 points, 12 × 12 μm2 area) and (c) that with a stepping motor stage (6 × 6 points, 12 × 12 μm2).

FIG. 11.

(a) Optical micrograph of the fingerprint phantom (12 × 12 μm2 area). (b) Phantom imaged by mapping the maximum insertion loss measured with a piezostage (60 × 60 points, 12 × 12 μm2 area) and (c) that with a stepping motor stage (6 × 6 points, 12 × 12 μm2).

Close modal

A comparison of the acoustic image of 12 × 12 μm2 area obtained by the two methods, as shown in Figs. 11(b) and 11(c), implies that resolution was improved by using the piezostage measurement system. Table III shows the imaging conditions for each measurement system. In the imaging with stepping motor stage, the interval between each measurement points is 2 μm, whereas in the imaging with the piezostage, the interval between measurement points can be 200 nm. This would allow the number of data points to increase, therefore improving the resolution.

TABLE III.

Imaging conditions for each measurement system.

Stepping motor stage [Fig. 11(c)]Piezostage [Fig. 11(b)]
Distance between measurement point 2 μ200 nm 
Imaging area 12 × 12 μm2 12 × 12 μm2 
Number of data points 6 × 6 points (36 points) 60 × 60 points (3600 points) 
Stepping motor stage [Fig. 11(c)]Piezostage [Fig. 11(b)]
Distance between measurement point 2 μ200 nm 
Imaging area 12 × 12 μm2 12 × 12 μm2 
Number of data points 6 × 6 points (36 points) 60 × 60 points (3600 points) 

In conclusion, the GHz range nine thickness extensional mode PbTiO3 transducer array was fabricated for fingerprint imaging. Fingerprint imaging was performed by mapping the difference of acoustic reflectance at the ridges and valleys of elastomer fingerprint phantom when pressed at the backside of the transducer substrate. The resolution of the two measurement systems was compared. The number of data points with stepping motor stage was 6 × 6 points (total 36 points) in a 12 × 12 μm2 area, while the number with the piezostage was 60 × 60 points (total 3600 points), indicating improvement of imaging resolution. As a future prospect, further imaging of small objects by the GHz range ultrasound transducers will be considered.

This work was supported by JST CREST (No. JPMJCR20Q1), JST FOREST, and KAKENHI (Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research B, Nos. 19H02202 and 21K18734).

The authors have no conflicts to disclose.

Kae Nakamura: Data curation (equal); Validation (equal); Visualization (equal); Writing – original draft (lead); Writing – review & editing (supporting). Yuna Koike: Data curation (equal); Formal analysis (supporting); Investigation (supporting); Methodology (equal); Software (supporting); Validation (supporting); Visualization (equal); Writing – original draft (equal); Writing – review & editing (equal). Yusuke Sato: Data curation (lead); Formal analysis (lead); Investigation (lead); Methodology (equal); Software (lead); Validation (lead); Visualization (equal); Writing – original draft (equal); Writing – review & editing (equal). Takahiko Yanagitani: Conceptualization (lead); Formal analysis (supporting); Funding acquisition (lead); Investigation (supporting); Methodology (lead); Project administration (lead); Resources (lead); Software (equal); Supervision (lead); Validation (supporting); Visualization (supporting); Writing – original draft (supporting); Writing – review & editing (lead).

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

1.
Y.
Lu
,
H.
Tang
,
S.
Fung
,
Q.
Wang
,
J. M.
Tsai
,
M.
Daneman
,
B. E.
Boser
, and
D. A.
Horsley
,
Appl. Phys. Lett.
106
(
26
),
263503
(
2015
).
2.
A.
Dangi
,
C. Y.
Cheng
,
S.
Agrawai
,
S.
Tiwari
,
G. R.
Datta
,
R. R.
Benoit
, and
S.
Troiler-Mckinstry
,
IEEE Trans. Ultrason., Ferroelectr., Frequency Control
67
(
4
),
801
(
2020
).
3.
P.
Muralt
,
N.
Ledermann
,
J.
Baborowski
,
A.
Barzegar
,
S.
Gentil
,
B.
Belgacem
,
A.
Bosseboef
, and
N.
Setter
,
IEEE Trans. Ultrason., Ferroelectr., Frequency Control
52
(
12
),
2276
(
2005
).
4.
J. C.
Kuo
,
J. T.
Hoople
,
M.
Abdel-Moneum
, and
A.
Lal
, in
Proceedings of IEEE MEMS
(
IEEE
,
2017
), p.
9
.
5.
T.
Yanagitani
and
M.
Suzuki
,
Appl. Phys. Lett.
105
(
12
),
122907
(
2014
).
6.
S.
Kinoshita
and
T.
Yanagitani
,
Appl. Phys. Lett.
118
(
14
),
142903
(
2021
).
7.
T.
Yanagitani
,
K.
Katada
,
M.
Suzuki
, and
K.
Wasa
, in
Proceedings of the IEEE Frequency Control Symposium
(
IEEE
,
2014
), p.
121
.
8.
T.
Yanagitani
,
M.
Kiuchi
,
M.
Matsukawa
, and
Y.
Watanabe
,
J. Appl. Phys.
102
(
2
),
024110
(
2007
).
9.
T.
Yanagitani
and
M.
Kiuchi
,
J. Appl. Phys.
102
(
4
),
044115
(
2007
).
10.
N.
Lamberti
,
G.
Caliano
,
A.
Iula
, and
A. S.
Savoia
,
Sens. Actuators, A
172
(
2
),
561
569
(
2011
).