Thermal transport in nuclear fuels used for nuclear energy applications is directly tied to performance and reliability. Uranium dioxide (UO2), one of the most important nuclear fuels, can accumulate excess oxygen atoms as interstitial defects, which significantly impacts thermal transport properties. In this study, thermal conductivities and inelastic neutron scattering (INS) measurements on UO2+x were performed at low temperatures (2–300 K). The thermal conductivity of UO2+x (x =0, 0.03, 0.04, and 0.11) is significantly suppressed compared to UO2 except near the Néel temperature TN = 30.8 K, where it is independent of x. INS measurements demonstrate that the heat capacities and phonon group velocities of UO2 and UO2.08 are similar, and the suppressed thermal conductivity results from smaller phonon lifetimes. These perceptions advance our understanding of thermal transport properties in advanced nuclear fuels and guide safe and economic utilization of nuclear energy.

Uranium dioxide (UO2) is the most widely used nuclear fuel, and its thermal properties are important to reactor safety and performance.1 UO2 is able to accommodate a variable stoichiometry, depending on temperature and oxygen pressure.2,3 For example, UO2 can be oxidized by water vapor in the rare event of a cladding breach in a reactor, which consequently raises the ratio of oxygen to uranium (O/U = 2 + x).2 The excess oxygen atoms in hyperstoichiometric uranium dioxide (x > 0) were identified as interstitial defects that form partially ordered clusters.4–6 In addition, the O/U ratio is one of the most important parameters governing fuel safety, because it significantly affects the thermal properties such as the melting point7 and thermal conductivity.8–12 For example, Manara et al.7 found that the melting point of UO2+x (x =0–0.21) decreases as the O/U ratio increases. White and Nelson11 reported that UO2+x pellets exhibit a decrease in thermal conductivity with increasing temperature and follow 1/T dependence due to the anharmonic Umklapp phonon–phonon scattering at 363–1673 K, and the thermal conductivity of UO2+x also decreases as x increases, indicating the importance of phonon-defect scattering.

Although there are many studies of the thermal properties of UO2+x at high temperatures (300–1700 K),7–13 there is little information on the thermal conductivity and phonon properties of UO2+x at low temperatures (below 300 K). The effects of excess oxygen atoms (x) on the thermal conductivity of UO2+x at low temperatures, especially around Néel temperature TN = 30.8 K, are of critical importance in benchmarking theoretical models. In this study, the thermal conductivity of UO2 and UO2+x single crystals is reported in the temperature range of 2–300 K. We find that UO2+x has a much smaller thermal conductivity than UO2 at all temperatures except near the Néel temperature, where it is unaffected by the excess oxygen. The phonon density of states (PDOS) and scattering function measured by inelastic neutron scattering (INS) demonstrate that the suppressed thermal conductivity in UO2+x originates with a decrease in phonon lifetimes with the addition of excess oxygen.

The depleted UO2 crystals were sintered to 92% of the theoretical density at 1377 K and cooled down under Ar-6% H2 flow in order to achieve a nominal oxygen stoichiometry of 2.00.14 The hyperstoichiometric UO2 crystals were obtained by adjusting the partial pressure of oxygen and controlling the oxygen activity at 1273 K in a thermogravimetric analyzer. The final oxygen stoichiometry of the UO2+x crystals was calculated from the sample weight change relative to the stoichiometric UO2 reference data. In this method, the typical error for calculating the O:U is ±0.002.11 Thermal conductivity measurements on UO2 and UO2+x single crystals with the size of ∼1 × 1 × 3 mm3 were performed in a DynaCool-9 quantum design measurement system. The measurements were performed in the continuous heating mode of the thermal transport Option (TTO) option using a pulse-power steady-state method. The crystals were measured from 2 to 300 K at 0.25 K/min.

The single crystals used in the thermal conductivity measurements are too small for direct INS measurement on phonon dispersion and especially phonon linewidths. Hence, to characterize the phonon properties, instead INS measurements on ∼10 g depleted UO2 and UO2.08 powders at 77 and 295 K were performed using the wide angular range chopper spectrometer (ARCS) at the Spallation Neutron Source (SNS) of Oak Ridge National Laboratory.15 The setup of the spectrometer was identical to previously reported PDOS measurements for UO2.14,16 An incident neutron energy of Ei = 120 meV was used, which is high enough to capture the phonon cutoff (maximum phonon energy) around 80 meV and allows for summing over enough zones in momentum space to obtain PDOS. Scattering introduced by the sample can and the cryostat were corrected by subtracting the corresponding spectra from a duplicate, empty sample can measurement. The corrected scattered neutron intensities, I(Φ, t), were converted to the scattering function S(Q, E), where Q is the momentum transfer magnitude and E is the energy transfer. Other experimental details can be found elsewhere14,16 and are not repeated here. The neutron weighted PDOS gNW(E) was then obtained by integrating S(Q, E) over Q values ranging from 4 to 10 Å−1 for both UO2 and UO2.08, then correcting for multiphonon scattering (using an iterative procedure),17 the Debye–Waller factor, and thermal population factor, and subtracting the elastic peak. Note that the Q integration range (4–10 Å−1) was intentionally selected to create a square box in S(Q, E) to eliminate effects of uneven Q averaging on the Debye–Waller factor correction while still including a wide enough angle range to obtain a sufficient zone average.

The measured neutron weighted PDOS can be expressed as

(1)

where gi, Mi, and σi are the partial PDOS, the atomic mass, and the corresponding neutron scattering cross section18 of element i (i =U or O), respectively. In order to extract the neutron unweighted PDOS, we take advantage of the fact that nearly all phonon modes below 25 meV are from uranium, and nearly all phonon modes above 25 meV are from oxygen.14,19,20

The specific heat at constant pressure, CP, can be written as

(2)

where CV is the specific heat at constant volume, α is the linear thermal expansion, B is the bulk modulus, v is the molar volume, and T is the temperature.21 The phonon contribution to the specific heat at constant volume CVph can be obtained directly from the neutron unweighted PDOS using

(3)

where kB and gT0(E) are the Boltzmann constant and neutron unweighted PDOS at temperature T0, respectively.16 

The measured thermal conductivity of UO2+x single crystals as a function of temperature is shown in Fig. 1(a). The thermal conductivity of UO2+x for all values of measured x exhibits a peak at ∼10 K and a broad maximum at ∼220 K, and a minimum occurs at the Néel temperature TN = 30.8 K, consistent with previous observations.22–24 In addition, other than in the vicinity of TN, the thermal conductivity of UO2+x is significantly suppressed compared to UO2 and decreases with increasing x [see Fig. 1(b)]. The decreasing thermal conductivity with increasing x is similar to that observed at high temperatures, where it has been attributed to phonon-defect scattering.8–12 More specifically, the thermal conductivity of UO2.08 [2.68 W/(m K)] is 67% of the value for UO2 at 77 K [4.46 W/(m K)]. However, the thermal conductivity of UO2+x is essentially independent of the x at TN = 30.8 K [∼1 W/(m K)], and this is likely due to magnetic critical fluctuations that become the dominant factor in controlling the thermal conductivity right at the magnetic transition,25 see Fig. 1(b).

FIG. 1.

(a) Measured thermal conductivity of UO2 and UO2+x single crystals as a function of temperature. Thermal conductivity of UO2.08 is obtained by interpolation between UO2.04 and UO2.11. (b) Measured thermal conductivity of UO2+x single crystals as a function of the excess oxygen atoms x at several different temperatures.

FIG. 1.

(a) Measured thermal conductivity of UO2 and UO2+x single crystals as a function of temperature. Thermal conductivity of UO2.08 is obtained by interpolation between UO2.04 and UO2.11. (b) Measured thermal conductivity of UO2+x single crystals as a function of the excess oxygen atoms x at several different temperatures.

Close modal

To gain deeper insight into the suppressed thermal conductivity in UO2+x, we first measured a neutron diffraction pattern of UO2.08 in Fig. S1 of the supplementary material. It shows that UO2.08 adopts a mix phase of UO2 and U4O9, consistent with the reported phase diagram with 0 < x  <0.25 at low temperatures.13,26,27 We then measured their neutron weighted PDOS of UO2 and UO2.08 at 77 and 295 K, respectively, as shown in Figs. 2(a) and 2(b). Well-defined zone-boundary phonon peaks are observed at energies of 12, 21, 33, 56, and 72 meV for both UO2 and UO2.08 at 77 and 295 K, respectively. With reference to the phonon dispersion of UO2,14,28 the uranium-dominated transverse acoustic (TA) and the longitudinal acoustic (LA) zone-boundary phonon energies correspond to the 12 and 21 meV peaks. These peaks show a trivial difference between UO2 and UO2.08. The oxygen-dominated transverse optical (TO1 and TO2) and the longitudinal optical LO2 zone-boundary phonon energies correspond to the remaining 33, 56, and 72 meV peaks, respectively. In contrast, these peaks in UO2.08 are less intense and slightly broader than that in UO2. In addition, there are some nonnegligible intensities above phonon cutoff (78 meV, maximum phonon energy in UO2), which are consistent with nonlinear propagating modes (NPMs) identified in a previous study.29 Most importantly, all of these peak positions in UO2.08 show trivial shifts compared to UO2, indicating similar phonon group velocities in these two materials. The calculated specific heat capacities (CP) of UO2 and UO2.08 using the neutron unweighted 77 and 295 K PDOS based on Eqs. (2) and (3) are shown in Figs. 2(c) and 2(d). Our calculated CP of UO2 shows good agreement with the experimental CP,16,30 except in the vicinity of TN where magnetic contributions are large.31–33 Moreover, CP of UO2 and UO2.08 are almost the same (less than 2% difference) over the entire temperature range of 2–300 K. Note that their CVph also show trivial difference as shown in Fig. S2 of the supplementary material.

FIG. 2.

The neutron weighted PDOS of UO2 (red spheres) and UO2.08 (blue spheres) powders measured by INS at (a) 77 K and (b) 295 K; the specific heat capacity (CP) of UO2 (red line) and UO2.08 (blue line) with respect to temperature were calculated using unweighted PDOS at (c) T0 = 77 K and (d) T0 = 295 K. Solid and open black circles are previous experimental CP of UO2 single crystal16 and sintered powder.30 A sharp spike at TN = 30.8 K is a result of the Néel transition from an antiferromagnetic state to a paramagnetic state.

FIG. 2.

The neutron weighted PDOS of UO2 (red spheres) and UO2.08 (blue spheres) powders measured by INS at (a) 77 K and (b) 295 K; the specific heat capacity (CP) of UO2 (red line) and UO2.08 (blue line) with respect to temperature were calculated using unweighted PDOS at (c) T0 = 77 K and (d) T0 = 295 K. Solid and open black circles are previous experimental CP of UO2 single crystal16 and sintered powder.30 A sharp spike at TN = 30.8 K is a result of the Néel transition from an antiferromagnetic state to a paramagnetic state.

Close modal

Thermal conductivity (k) of single crystals in the phonon gas model is quantitatively described by

(4)

where CVph, Vg, and τ are the phonon heat capacity, the average phonon group velocity, and the average phonon lifetimes, respectively. With the similar CVph and Vg in UO2 and UO2.08, the lower thermal conductivity in UO2.08 must result from smaller average phonon lifetimes than UO2. For example, given that the thermal conductivity of UO2.08 is about 67% of the value of UO2 at 77 K, the average phonon lifetimes in UO2.08 are expected to be about 82% of the value of UO2. To validate this, we plot the measured scattering function S(Q, E) as a function of E and Q at 77 and 295 K in Figs. 3(a)–3(d). Interestingly, all S(Q, E) contour plots exhibit near-sinusoidal shaped features in the energy range of 20–55 meV and flat features at 56 and 72 meV, corresponding to LO1, TO2, and LO2 phonon branches based on its known phonon dispersion.28 Moreover, the LO1 phonon branches in UO2.08 are noticeably broader than UO2 at both temperatures, which indicate smaller phonon lifetimes in UO2.08. (Note that in the previous work, the LO1 phonon branch was found to contribute the largest amount (>30%) to the total thermal conductivity in UO2.28)

FIG. 3.

Color contour plots of the scattering function S(Q, E) as a function of E and Q for (a) 77 K UO2 and (b) 77 K UO2.08, (c) 295 K UO2 and (d) 295 K UO2.08 measured by INS. Energy cuts of the scattering function at (e) Q = [3.75, 3.8] and (f) Q = [5.256, 5.306] for 77 K. Red and blue lines in (e) and (f) are fits of these INS data. Fit values for the phonon energies and linewidths are shown in the insets. Red and blue denote UO2 and UO2.08, respectively. The FWHM has been corrected for instrument resolution.

FIG. 3.

Color contour plots of the scattering function S(Q, E) as a function of E and Q for (a) 77 K UO2 and (b) 77 K UO2.08, (c) 295 K UO2 and (d) 295 K UO2.08 measured by INS. Energy cuts of the scattering function at (e) Q = [3.75, 3.8] and (f) Q = [5.256, 5.306] for 77 K. Red and blue lines in (e) and (f) are fits of these INS data. Fit values for the phonon energies and linewidths are shown in the insets. Red and blue denote UO2 and UO2.08, respectively. The FWHM has been corrected for instrument resolution.

Close modal

Selected energy cuts of the measured scattering function at Q = [3.75, 3.8] and Q = [5.256, 5.306] for 77 K are shown in Figs. 3(e) and 3(f). The phonon energies of TO2 and LO2 modes in UO2 are very close to UO2.08, consistent with the PDOS (Fig. 2). The linewidths of the TO2 and LO2 modes in UO2 [red symbols, lines, and labels in Figs. 3(e) and 3(f)] are comparable to previously measured linewidths (2–3 meV) in a UO2 single crystal17—indicating that the powder averaged linewidths observed here are a reasonable representation of the direction resolved widths. (The preservation of these modes with powder averaging is a result of the high symmetry of these modes in the fluorite structure.19) Comparing samples, the UO2.08 linewidths [blue symbols, lines, and labels in Figs. 3(e) and 3(f)] for the TO2 modes are about two to four times broader than UO2, and the LO2 modes are about 1 to 1.3 times broader. These results are consistent with an overall smaller average phonon lifetime in UO2.08. The phonon lifetimes (an inverse of linewidths) of the TO2 and LO2 branches in UO2.08 and UO2 are summarized in Table I. In brief, given the similar CVph and Vg in UO2 and UO2+x (Figs. 2 and 3) and the observed smaller phonon lifetimes for select modes (Fig. 3 and Table I), we deduce that it must be the phonon lifetimes that control the composition dependence of the thermal conductivity of UO2+x (Fig. 1).

TABLE I.

Phonon lifetimes τ (ps) of TO2 and LO2 modes at two different Q points extracted from the energy cuts of measured scattering function S(Q, E) for UO2.08 and UO2 at 77 K.

77 Kτ (ps), TO2τ (ps), LO2
Q = [3.75, 3.8]Q = [5.256, 5.306]Q = [3.75, 3.8]Q = [5.256, 5.306]
UO2.08 0.54 0.50 1.38 1.88 
UO2 1.06 1.88 1.80 1.88 
77 Kτ (ps), TO2τ (ps), LO2
Q = [3.75, 3.8]Q = [5.256, 5.306]Q = [3.75, 3.8]Q = [5.256, 5.306]
UO2.08 0.54 0.50 1.38 1.88 
UO2 1.06 1.88 1.80 1.88 

In summary, we performed thermal conductivity and INS measurements on UO2 and UO2+x at low temperatures (2–300 K). It is found that the thermal conductivities of all UO2+x single crystals exhibit a double-peak behavior, where maxima occur at 10 and 220 K and a minimum occurs at the Néel temperature TN = 30.8 K, consistent with previous studies on UO2. Except in the vicinity of TN, the thermal conductivity of UO2+x is significantly suppressed compared to UO2 and decreases with increasing x. At TN = 30.8 K, the thermal conductivity of UO2+x is essentially independent of the x. Further INS measurements of the PDOS and scattering function demonstrate that the heat capacity and phonon group velocities of UO2 and UO2+x are similar, and thus, the suppressed thermal conductivity is attributed to shorter phonon lifetimes in UO2+x. This conclusion is supported by observed shorter lifetimes for select phonon modes in the powder averaged scattering function.

See the supplementary material for the measured neutron diffraction patterns and heat capacity (CVph) of UO2 and UO2.08.

H.M., M.S.B., K.G., and M.E.M. were supported by the Center for Thermal Energy Transport under Irradiation, an Energy Frontier Research Center funded by the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE), Office of Science, United States, Office of Basic Energy Sciences. D.J.A. and K.G. acknowledge support from the Advanced Fuel Campaign program (INL). Portions of this research used resources at the Spallation Neutron Source, a U.S. DOE Office of Science User Facility operated by the Oak Ridge National Laboratory. We are grateful to David A. Andersson and Christopher R. Stanek for providing UO2+x crystals for the thermal conductivity measurements. This manuscript has been authored by UT-Battelle, LLC under Contract No. DE-AC05-00OR22725 with the U.S. Department of Energy. The United States Government retains and the publisher, by accepting the article for publication, acknowledges that the United States Government retains a non-exclusive, paid-up, irrevocable, world-wide license to publish or reproduce the published form of this manuscript, or allow others to do so, for United States Government purposes. The Department of Energy will provide public access to these results of federally sponsored research in accordance with the DOE Public Access Plan (http://energy.gov/downloads/doe-public-access-plan).

The authors have no conflicts to disclose.

Hao Ma: Data curation (equal); Investigation (equal); Writing - original draft (equal). Matthew S. Bryan: Formal analysis (supporting). Judy W. L. Pang: Investigation (supporting); Methodology (supporting). Douglas L. Abernathy: Methodology (supporting). Daniel J. Antonio: Methodology (supporting). Krzysztof Gofryk: Methodology (equal). Michael E. Manley: Conceptualization (equal); Supervision (equal); Writing - review and editing (equal).

The data that support the findings of this study are available within the article and its supplementary material.

1.
D. H.
Hurley
,
A.
El-Azab
,
M. S.
Bryan
,
M. W. D.
Cooper
,
C. A.
Dennett
,
K.
Gofryk
,
L.
He
,
M.
Khafizov
,
G. H.
Lander
,
M. E.
Manley
,
J. M.
Mann
,
C. A.
Marianetti
,
K.
Rickert
,
F. A.
Selim
,
M. R.
Tonks
, and
J. P.
Wharry
, “
Thermal energy transport in oxide nuclear fuel
,”
Chem. Rev.
122
,
3711
(
2022
).
2.
W. T.
Thompson
,
B. J.
Lewis
,
E. C.
Corcoran
,
M. H.
Kaye
,
S. J.
White
,
F.
Akbari
,
Z.
He
,
R.
Verrall
,
J. D.
Higgs
,
D. M.
Thompson
,
T. M.
Besmann
, and
S. C.
Vogel
, “
Thermodynamic treatment of uranium dioxide based nuclear fuel
,”
Int. J. Mater. Res.
98
(
10
),
1004
1011
(
2007
).
3.
D. R.
Olander
, “
Mechanistic interpretations of UO2 oxidation
,”
J. Nucl. Mater.
252
(
1
),
121
130
(
1998
).
4.
J.
Wang
,
R. C.
Ewing
, and
U.
Becker
, “
Average structure and local configuration of excess oxygen in UO2+x
,”
Sci. Rep.
4
(
1
),
4216
(
2015
).
5.
B. T. M.
Willis
, “
Positions of the oxygen atoms in UO2.13
,”
Nature
197
(
4869
),
755
756
(
1963
).
6.
B.
Willis
, “
The defect structure of hyper-stoichiometric uranium dioxide
,”
Acta Crystallogr., Sect. A
34
(
1
),
88
90
(
1978
).
7.
D.
Manara
,
C.
Ronchi
,
M.
Sheindlin
,
M.
Lewis
, and
M.
Brykin
, “
Melting of stoichiometric and hyperstoichiometric uranium dioxide
,”
J. Nucl. Mater.
342
(
1
),
148
163
(
2005
).
8.
F. J.
Hetzler
and
E. L.
Zebroski
, “
Thermal conductivity of stoichiometric and hypostoichiometric uranium oxide at high temperatures
,”
Trans. Am. Nucl. Soc.
7
,
392
(
1964
).
9.
L. A.
Goldsmith
and
J. A. M.
Douglas
, “
Measurements of the thermal conductivity of uranium dioxide at 670–1270 k
,”
J. Nucl. Mater.
47
,
31
42
(
1973
).
10.
M.
Amaya
,
T.
Kubo
, and
Y.
Korei
, “
Thermal conductivity measurements on UO2+x from 300 to 1,400 K
,”
J. Nucl. Sci. Technol.
33
(
8
),
636
640
(
1996
).
11.
J. T.
White
and
A. T.
Nelson
, “
Thermal conductivity of UO2+x and U4O9−y
,”
J. Nucl. Mater.
443
(
1
),
342
350
(
2013
).
12.
S.
Yamasaki
,
T.
Arima
,
K.
Idemitsu
, and
Y.
Inagaki
, “
Evaluation of thermal conductivity of hyperstoichiometric UO2+x by molecular dynamics simulation
,”
Int. J. Thermophys.
28
(
2
),
661
673
(
2007
).
13.
X. Y.
Liu
,
M. W. D.
Cooper
,
K. J.
McClellan
,
J. C.
Lashley
,
D. D.
Byler
,
B. D. C.
Bell
,
R. W.
Grimes
,
C. R.
Stanek
, and
D. A.
Andersson
, “
Molecular dynamics simulation of thermal transport in UO2 containing uranium, oxygen, and fission-product defects
,”
Phys. Rev. Appl.
6
(
4
),
044015
(
2016
).
14.
J. W. L.
Pang
,
A.
Chernatynskiy
,
B. C.
Larson
,
W. J. L.
Buyers
,
D. L.
Abernathy
,
K. J.
McClellan
, and
S. R.
Phillpot
, “
Phonon density of states and anharmonicity of UO2
,”
Phys. Rev. B
89
(
11
),
115132
(
2014
).
15.
D. L.
Abernathy
,
M. B.
Stone
,
M. J.
Loguillo
,
M. S.
Lucas
,
O.
Delaire
,
X.
Tang
,
J. Y. Y.
Lin
, and
B.
Fultz
, “
Design and operation of the wide angular-range chopper spectrometer ARCS at the Spallation Neutron Source
,”
Rev. Sci. Instrum.
83
(
1
),
015114
(
2012
).
16.
M. S.
Bryan
,
J. W. L.
Pang
,
B. C.
Larson
,
A.
Chernatynskiy
,
D. L.
Abernathy
,
K.
Gofryk
, and
M. E.
Manley
, “
Impact of anharmonicity on the vibrational entropy and specific heat of UO2
,”
Phys. Rev. Mater.
3
(
6
),
065405
(
2019
).
17.
M. E.
Manley
,
R. J.
McQueeney
,
B.
Fultz
,
R.
Osborn
,
G. H.
Kwei
, and
P. D.
Bogdanoff
, “
Vibrational and electronic entropy of β-cerium and γ-cerium measured by inelastic neutron scattering
,”
Phys. Rev. B
65
(
14
),
144111
(
2002
).
18.
V. F.
Sears
, “
Neutron scattering lengths and cross sections
,”
Neutron News
3
(
3
),
26
37
(
1992
).
19.
T.
Arima
,
S.
Yamasaki
,
Y.
Inagaki
, and
K.
Idemitsu
, “
Evaluation of thermal properties of UO2 and PuO2 by equilibrium molecular dynamics simulations from 300 to 2000 K
,”
J. Alloys Compd.
400
(
1
),
43
50
(
2005
).
20.
P.
Goel
,
N.
Choudhury
, and
S. L.
Chaplot
, “
Fast ion diffusion, superionic conductivity and phase transitions of the nuclear materials UO2 and Li2O
,”
J. Phys.
19
(
38
),
386239
(
2007
).
21.
D. C.
Wallace
,
Statistical Physics of Crystals and Liquids
(
World Scientific
,
2002
).
22.
K.
Gofryk
,
S.
Du
,
C. R.
Stanek
,
J. C.
Lashley
,
X. Y.
Liu
,
R. K.
Schulze
,
J. L.
Smith
,
D. J.
Safarik
,
D. D.
Byler
,
K. J.
McClellan
,
B. P.
Uberuaga
,
B. L.
Scott
, and
D. A.
Andersson
, “
Anisotropic thermal conductivity in uranium dioxide
,”
Nat. Commun.
5
(
1
),
4551
(
2014
).
23.
J. P.
Moore
and
D. L.
Mcelroy
, “
Thermal conductivity of nearly stoichiometric single-crystal and polycrystalline UO2
,”
J. Am. Ceram. Soc.
54
(
1
),
40
46
(
1971
).
24.
K.
Shrestha
,
T.
Yao
,
J.
Lian
,
D.
Antonio
,
M.
Sessim
,
M. R.
Tonks
, and
K.
Gofryk
, “
The grain-size effect on thermal conductivity of uranium dioxide
,”
J. Appl. Phys.
126
(
12
),
125116
(
2019
).
25.
J. J.
Binney
,
N. J.
Dowrick
,
A. J.
Fisher
,
M. E. J.
Newman
,
A. J.
Fisher
, and
M. E.
Newman
,
The Theory of Critical Phenomena: An Introduction to the Renormalization Group
(
Clarendon Press
,
1992
).
26.
J. D.
Higgs
,
W. T.
Thompson
,
B. J.
Lewis
, and
S. C.
Vogel
, “
Kinetics of precipitation of U4O9 from hyperstoichiometric UO2+x
,”
J. Nucl. Mater.
366
(
3
),
297
305
(
2007
).
27.
R. I.
Palomares
,
M. T.
McDonnell
,
L.
Yang
,
T.
Yao
,
J. E. S.
Szymanowski
,
J.
Neuefeind
,
G. E.
Sigmon
,
J.
Lian
,
M. G.
Tucker
,
B. D.
Wirth
, and
M.
Lang
, “
Oxygen point defect accumulation in single-phase UO2+x
,”
Phys. Rev. Mater.
3
(
5
),
053611
(
2019
).
28.
J. W. L.
Pang
,
W. J. L.
Buyers
,
A.
Chernatynskiy
,
M. D.
Lumsden
,
B. C.
Larson
, and
S. R.
Phillpot
, “
Phonon lifetime investigation of anharmonicity and thermal conductivity of UO2 by neutron scattering and theory
,”
Phys. Rev. Lett.
110
(
15
),
157401
(
2013
).
29.
M. S.
Bryan
,
L.
Fu
,
K.
Rickert
,
D.
Turner
,
T. A.
Prusnick
,
J. M.
Mann
,
D. L.
Abernathy
,
C. A.
Marianetti
, and
M. E.
Manley
, “
Nonlinear propagating modes beyond the phonons in fluorite-structured crystals
,”
Commun. Phys.
3
(
1
),
217
(
2020
).
30.
J. J.
Huntzicker
and
E. F.
Westrum
, “
The magnetic transition, heat capacity, and thermodynamic properties of uranium dioxide from 5 to 350 K
,”
J. Chem. Thermodyn.
3
(
1
),
61
76
(
1971
).
31.
G. D.
Khattak
, “
Specific heat of uranium dioxide (UO2) between 0.3 and 50 K
,”
Phys. Status Solidi A
75
(
1
),
317
321
(
1983
).
32.
R.
De Batist
,
R.
Gevers
, and
M.
Verschueren
, “
Magnon contribution to the low-temperature specific heat of UO2
,”
Phys. Status. Solidi B
19
(
1
),
77
88
(
1967
).
33.
A. P.
Cracknell
and
S. J.
Joshua
, “
The spin-wave dispersion relations and the spin-wave contribution to the specific heat of antiferromagnetic UO2
,”
Phys. Status Solidi B
36
(
2
),
737
745
(
1969
).

Supplementary Material