The inverse spinel ferrimagnetic NiCo2O4 possesses high magnetic Curie temperature TC, high spin polarization, and strain-tunable magnetic anisotropy. Understanding the thickness scaling limit of these intriguing magnetic properties in NiCo2O4 thin films is critical for their implementation in nanoscale spintronic applications. In this work, we report the unconventional magnetotransport properties of epitaxial (001) NiCo2O4 films on MgAl2O4 substrates in the ultrathin limit. Anomalous Hall effect measurements reveal strong perpendicular magnetic anisotropy for films down to 1.5 unit cell (1.2 nm), while TC for 3 unit cell and thicker films remains above 300 K. The sign change in the anomalous Hall conductivity (σxy) and its scaling relation with the longitudinal conductivity (σxx) can be attributed to the competing effects between impurity scattering and band intrinsic Berry curvature, with the latter vanishing upon the thickness driven metal–insulator transition. Our study reveals the critical role of film thickness in tuning the relative strength of charge correlation, Berry phase effect, spin–orbit interaction, and impurity scattering, providing important material information for designing scalable epitaxial magnetic tunnel junctions and sensing devices using NiCo2O4.

Magnetic thin films with high spin polarization, high Curie temperature, and perpendicular magnetic anisotropy (PMA) are important material solutions for developing high-speed energy-efficient spintronics.1,2 A promising material candidate is the ferrimagnetic inverse spinel NiCo2O4 (NCO), where the majority and minority spins are associated with the tetrahedral site Co ions and octahedral site Ni ions, respectively [Fig. 1(a), inset]. Previous studies have shown that epitaxial NCO films exhibit intriguing magnetotransport properties,3–5 strain tunable magnetic anisotropy,6 and spin polarization as high as −73%.7 Being lattice matched with the high-performance tunnel barrier candidate, MgAl2O4, it can be utilized as the spin injection layer for epitaxial magnetic tunnel junctions (MTJs),7–10 which can potentially suppress the band-folding effect and lead to enhanced tunneling magnetoresistance.11 Compared with amorphous MTJs, epitaxial NCO/MgAl2O4/NCO heterostructures also facilitate the understanding of symmetry-based spin filtering effect.12 Despite the emerging interest in epitaxial NCO thin films,2–7,13–18 fundamental understanding of the thickness scaling behavior of its intriguing magnetic properties remains elusive.

FIG. 1.

(a) XRD θ–2θ scan of a 60 uc NCO film on MgAl2O4 (MAO) with a fit to Laue oscillations near the (004) peak (dotted line). Inset: schematic of NCO crystal structure. (b) HAADF-STEM and (inset) SAED images taken on a 17 uc NCO. (c) AFM topography image of a 5 uc NCO showing atomically flat terraces. (d) R(T) for 1.5–5 uc films. The dotted line illustrates the two-dimensional quantum resistance he2.

FIG. 1.

(a) XRD θ–2θ scan of a 60 uc NCO film on MgAl2O4 (MAO) with a fit to Laue oscillations near the (004) peak (dotted line). Inset: schematic of NCO crystal structure. (b) HAADF-STEM and (inset) SAED images taken on a 17 uc NCO. (c) AFM topography image of a 5 uc NCO showing atomically flat terraces. (d) R(T) for 1.5–5 uc films. The dotted line illustrates the two-dimensional quantum resistance he2.

Close modal

In this work, we report the observation of unconventional anomalous Hall effect (AHE) and strong PMA in ultrathin (001) NCO films strained on MgAl2O4 substrates. The Curie temperature (TC) of the NCO films remains above 300 K in films as thin as 3 unit cell (uc), while PMA is sustained even in 1.5 uc films. The anomalous Hall (AH) resistance shows a temperature-driven sign change, evolving from clockwise to counterclockwise hysteresis with decreasing temperature. The scaling behavior between the AH conductivity (σxy) and longitudinal conductivity (σxx) points to the collective contributions of spin-dependent scattering and band intrinsic Berry phase effect to the AHE in the metallic phase, with the latter vanishing upon the thickness driven metal–insulator transition (MIT).

We deposited epitaxial NCO films on (001) MgAl2O4 substrates via off-axis radio frequency magnetron sputtering at 320 °C in 100 mTorr processing gas (Ar:O2 = 1:1).3 X-ray diffraction (XRD) measurements reveal (001)-oriented growth with no impurity phase [Fig. 1(a)]. The Laue oscillations around the Bragg peaks were used to calibrate the growth rate. The c-axis lattice constant is 8.20 Å, higher than the bulk value (8.13 Å), which is consistent with a strained film on MgAl2O4 (a = 8.08 Å).13,16 The high crystallinity of the samples is clearly revealed by the high-angle annular dark-field scanning transmission electron microscopy (HAADF-STEM) and selected area electron diffraction (SAED) [Fig. 1(b)]. The as-grown NCO films show smooth surface morphology with a typical surface roughness of 2–3 Å [Fig. 1(c)]. Magnetotransport studies were carried out in van der Pauw device geometry using a Quantum Design Physical Property Measurement System connected with Keithley 2400 SourceMeter or standard lock-in technique (SR830) with low excitation current (≤10 μA). We studied two samples for each thickness and the results are highly consistent.

Figure 1(d) shows the temperature dependence of the sheet resistance R=ρxx/tNCO, where ρxx is the longitudinal resistivity and tNCO is the film thickness, of 1.5–5 uc NCO films. For the 3–5 uc samples, R shows a moderate, metallic T-dependence (dR/dT>0) below 350 K, consistent with that of thick NCO films.3,13,14 A resistance upturn appears (dR/dT<0) at low temperature, with the upturn temperature (Tup) increasing with reducing film thickness. This moderate resistance upturn is the signature behavior of weakly localized conductors, which can be due to electron back-scattering induced quantum interference effect or enhanced electron–electron interaction.19 The 1.5 uc film becomes insulating over the entire temperature range, with R(T) well described by variable range hoping. The transition to the strongly localized behavior occurs in the 2 uc film as R approaches he2 25.9 kΩ. This thickness-driven MIT has been widely observed in correlated oxide thin films, which may originate from dimensionality crossover,19,20 enhanced correlation induced energy gap in ultrathin films,19,21 or variation in oxygen octahedral distortion22 and impurity/defect states17 at surfaces/interfaces.

Figure 2(a) shows the AHE hysteresis taken in 1.5–5 uc NCO films at 100 K. The Hall resistivity, ρxy=RxytNCO with Rxy the Hall resistance, can be decomposed into the normal Hall and AHE contributions: ρxy=R0H+ρAHE. Here, the normal Hall coefficient R0=1/eneff yields the effective carrier density neff, H is the out-of-plane magnetic field, and ρAHE is the AH resistivity. All samples exhibit counterclockwise AHE hysteresis, which is defined as positive. The coercive field (Hc) is significantly reduced in the 1.5 and 2 uc films [Fig. 2(b)], which may be attributed to domain nucleation and domain wall motion promoted by interfacial defects23 and/or enhanced thermal fluctuation with reduced dimension. The sharp switching of the AHE hysteresis suggests that PMA is preserved in NCO films as thin as 1.5 uc. This can be well accounted for by the 0.6% compressive strain for (001) NCO on MgAl2O4, which yields ∼1 meV magnetic anisotropic energy between the in-plane and out-of-plane orientations, well exceeding the shape anisotropy (∼μeV).3,6,14 From the temperature dependence of ρAHE, we found that TC is above 300 K for the 3–5 uc NCO films and decreases to 230 K for the 2 uc (1.6 nm) NCO and 170 K for the 1.5 uc (1.2 nm) film [Fig. 2(c)]. Figure 2(d) compares the TC at the ultrathin limit for epitaxial thin films of magnetic complex oxides, such as SrRuO3 (SRO)24 and La0.7Sr0.3MnO3 (LSMO),25 and two-dimensional (2D) van der Waals (vdW) magnets, including VSe2,26 MnSe2,27 CrSe2,28 CrI3,29 CrCl3,30 Fe3GeTe2 (FGT),31,32 and Cr2Ge2Te6 (CGT).33 Both classes of material systems are well suited to build crystalline heterostructures based on structurally similar yet functionally distinct constituents.34,35 The combined high TC and strong PMA of ultrathin NCO films outperform most magnetic complex oxides. Compared to 2D vdW magnets, it offers not only highly competitive material parameters but also the distinct advantage of scalable growth, where high-quality epitaxial ultrathin films can be controlled with atomic precision.36 These features make NCO a highly promising material candidate for developing nanoscale multifunctional applications.

FIG. 2.

(a) ρxy vs H hysteresis at 100 K for 1.5–5 uc NCO. tNCO-dependence of (b) HC at 100 K, and (c) TC, Tup, and Tsc. (d) TC vs thickness for epitaxial complex oxide films (squares)24,25 and 2D vdW magnets (circles).26–33 Solid symbols: PMA. Open symbols: in-plane magnetic anisotropy.

FIG. 2.

(a) ρxy vs H hysteresis at 100 K for 1.5–5 uc NCO. tNCO-dependence of (b) HC at 100 K, and (c) TC, Tup, and Tsc. (d) TC vs thickness for epitaxial complex oxide films (squares)24,25 and 2D vdW magnets (circles).26–33 Solid symbols: PMA. Open symbols: in-plane magnetic anisotropy.

Close modal

One intriguing property of NCO is that the AHE exhibits a nonmonotonic T-dependence that leads to temperature/film thickness driven sign change in ρAHE.3Figure 3(a) shows Rxy of a 2 uc film at various temperatures. Below TC of 230 K, Rxy exhibits a nonlinear H-dependence, signaling the appearance of AHE. The magnitude of AH resistance RAHE=ρAHE/tNCO first increases below TC, which can be attributed to the initial rapid growth of magnetization. After reaching a local maximum at 190 K, RAHE starts to decrease with decreasing temperature, and crosses zero at Tsc = 150 K. Similar T-dependence of RAHE has been observed in all ultrathin films [Fig. 3(b)]. The transition from the negative (clockwise) to positive (counterclockwise) hysteresis occurs smoothly without any abrupt jump in RAHE [Fig. 3(c)], and the sign change temperature Tsc does not exhibit an apparent dependence on film thickness [Fig. 2(c)]. As NCO is a multiband conductor,15 we also examined neff from the high field (up to 50 kOe) normal Hall effect. Figure 3(d) reveals a transition from electron-like (R0<0) to hole-like (R0>0) behavior upon cooling for the 2 uc sample. The transition temperature is about 200 K, much higher than Tsc, ruling out the change of carrier type as the origin of RAHE sign change. We also extracted Hc from the AHE hysteresis. The exponential T-dependence [Fig. 3(e)] points to thermally activated domain wall depinning.23 The smooth T-dependences of RAHE and Hc [Fig. 3(f)] indicate that the sign change in AHE is not induced by an abrupt change of magnetic state in the samples.

FIG. 3.

(a) AHE of 2 uc NCO at various temperatures. Field range: ±10 kOe for 5–10 K and ±4 kOe for higher temperatures. (b) AHE of 5 uc NCO at various temperatures. (c) RAHE vs T for 1.5–5 uc NCO. (d) n vs T and (e) Hc vs T for 2 uc NCO. (f) Rxy vs T and H (sweeping down) for 2 uc NCO.

FIG. 3.

(a) AHE of 2 uc NCO at various temperatures. Field range: ±10 kOe for 5–10 K and ±4 kOe for higher temperatures. (b) AHE of 5 uc NCO at various temperatures. (c) RAHE vs T for 1.5–5 uc NCO. (d) n vs T and (e) Hc vs T for 2 uc NCO. (f) Rxy vs T and H (sweeping down) for 2 uc NCO.

Close modal

Previous studies of thick NCO films show that the sign change phenomenon can result from the competition between multiple AHE mechanisms.3 Based on quantum transport theory of multiband magnetic conductors, the scaling relation between σxy and σxx depends on the relative strength of impurity scattering rate with respect to the Fermi energy,37 

σxy=constant;
(1a)
σxyσxx1.6.
(1b)

Equation (1a) describes the scattering-independent band intrinsic Berry phase contribution to AHE, which dominates in moderately dirty metals.37 Equation (1b) depicts the impurity scattering dominated behavior in dirty metals.37,38 For thick NCO films, σxx is close to the boundary between these two regions (σxx103Ω1cm1), and both mechanisms can coexist. For super-clean metals (σxx106Ω1cm1), the skew scattering mechanism arises due to the spin–orbit interaction associated with impurities, which yields a linear dependence between σxx and σxy.37 This mechanism is less likely to be prominent in NCO, which is prone to formation of various disorders due to its multi-cation, multivalence nature.2,4,15–18

Figure 4(a) shows σxy vs σxx for the ultrathin NCO films, where σxx is extracted from the zero-field R(T) [Fig. 1(d)] and σxy=ρAHE/ρxx2. A clear power-law dependence is present in all samples in the intermediate temperature range with the exponent close to 1.6. We fitted the scaling relation by considering both the impurity scattering and band intrinsic contributions as follows:

σxy=A1σxx1.6+σxy(0).
(2)
FIG. 4.

(a) σxy vs σxx for 1.5–5 uc NCO films with fits to Eqs. (2) and (3) (dash lines). (b) tNCO-dependence of A1, A2 and σxy(0). (c) Temperature-thickness diagram of the AHE scaling behavior. M: metallic, WL: weakly localized, and SL: strongly localized. The data for 10–30 uc films are taken from Ref. 3.

FIG. 4.

(a) σxy vs σxx for 1.5–5 uc NCO films with fits to Eqs. (2) and (3) (dash lines). (b) tNCO-dependence of A1, A2 and σxy(0). (c) Temperature-thickness diagram of the AHE scaling behavior. M: metallic, WL: weakly localized, and SL: strongly localized. The data for 10–30 uc films are taken from Ref. 3.

Close modal

Here, A1 is the fitting parameter and σxy(0) is the Berry phase contribution.37–40 The band intrinsic nature of the latter has been confirmed in thick films from the scaling behavior between σxy and magnetization.5 For the 3–5 uc films in the metallic region above Tup, the power law scaling between σxy and σxx can be well depicted by Eq. (2). The sign of σxy is thus determined by the relative strength of the positive contribution from dirty metal scattering and the negative Berry phase contribution. With reducing film thickness, σxx decreases, moving further away from the boundary to the moderately dirty region. This is consistent with the rising contribution from impurity scattering (A1), while the intrinsic contribution σxy(0) only shows a slight increase [Fig. 4(b)]. Below Tup, σxy exhibits very weak T-dependence. In addition to the band intrinsic effect, spin–orbit interaction in impurity scattering, known as the side jump effect σxy(1), may also lead to the scattering insensitive AHE in this region. Overall, the AHE for films of this thickness range (3–5 uc) is qualitatively similar to that observed in thicker films.3 

The 1.5–2 uc NCO films, in contrast, exhibit distinct σxy vs σxx scaling relation. The 2 uc film exhibits a MIT as R exceeds he2. While the high temperature AHE scaling still follows Eq. (2), there is a sharp increase in A1. Below Tup, σxx falls rapidly and the AHE can be well described by the following dirty metal scaling relation alone:

σxy=A2σxx1.6.
(3)

Similar scaling is observed in the insulating, 1.5 uc sample, where the negligible contribution of the Berry phase term is corroborated by the facts that Tsc approaches TC [Fig. 2(c)] and the sign change behavior is hard to resolve [Fig. 3(c)]. Equation (3) is qualitatively different from the σxx-independent σxy observed in the weakly localized regime of thicker films below Tup, and can be well accounted for by phonon-assisted hopping and percolative transport.19,41,42 It further shows that the spin scattering source is likely associated with the surface/interface of the sample, whose contribution becomes dominant in ultrathin films.

Based on this scenario, we summarized the AHE mechanisms observed in the ultrathin NCO films as well as previously studied thick films.3Figure 4(c) shows the temperature-film thickness diagram for the electronic and magnetic state of 1.5–30 uc NCO films. For 2 uc and thicker films, the intermediate temperature region between TC and Tup corresponds to a metallic phase, and the AHE depends on the collective contributions of band intrinsic effect and impurity scattering. Below Tup, RAHE becomes independent of scattering, which can be due to the Berry phase and/or side jump effect. Upon the onset of strong localization (R>he2),19,43 the Berry phase effect vanishes, and the dirty metal scaling behavior dominates RAHE. The rich electronic/AHE diagram is thus a clear manifestation of the complex energy landscape in NCO associated with magnetic exchange, electron correlation, spin–orbit interaction, and impurity scattering. The film thickness offers an effective control parameter to tune the relative strength between these energy scales, which can be utilized to design application-specific magnetic properties, including the magnetic transition temperature, coercive field, and the strength and sign of AH effect.

In summary, we show that epitaxial NCO films as thin as 1.5 uc (1.2 nm) can sustain strong PMA, competitive TC of 170 K, and robust AH effect. The AHE reveals the complex interplay between band intrinsic Berry phase effect and impurity scattering, while the film thickness can be leveraged to tune their relative strength. Our study also paves the path for scalable development of NCO-based epitaxial MTJs and sensor devices.

This work was primarily supported by the National Science Foundation through Grant No. DMR-1710461 and EPSCoR RII Track-1: Emergent Quantum Materials and Technologies (EQUATE), Award No. OIA-2044049. The work by X.C. was partially supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 12104005). The work by M.H. and Y.Z. was supported by the Materials Science and Engineering Divisions, Office of Basic Energy Sciences of the U.S. Department of Energy under Contract No. DESC0012704. TEM sample preparation using FIB was performed at the Center for Functional Nanomaterials, Brookhaven National Laboratory. The research was performed in part in the Nebraska Nanoscale Facility: National Nanotechnology Coordinated Infrastructure and the Nebraska Center for Materials and Nanoscience, which are supported by the National Science Foundation under Award No. ECCS: 2025298, and the Nebraska Research Initiative.

The authors have no conflicts to disclose.

Xuegang Chen: Conceptualization (equal); Data curation (lead); Formal analysis (lead); Investigation (lead); Validation (lead); Writing - original draft (lead). Qiuchen Wu: Data curation (equal); Formal analysis (equal); Investigation (equal); Validation (equal); Writing - review and editing (supporting). Le Zhang: Data curation (supporting). Yifei Hao: Data curation (supporting). Myung-Geun Han: Data curation (supporting); Formal analysis (supporting); Writing - review and editing (supporting). Yimei Zhu: Funding acquisition (supporting); Writing - review and editing (supporting). Xia Hong: Conceptualization (lead); Formal analysis (supporting); Funding acquisition (lead); Investigation (lead); Project administration (lead); Writing - original draft (equal); Writing - review and editing (lead). X.C. and Q.W. contributed equally to this work.

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

1.
T.
Dietl
, “
A ten-year perspective on dilute magnetic semiconductors and oxides
,”
Nat. Mater.
9
,
965
(
2010
).
2.
P.
Li
,
C.
Xia
,
J.
Li
,
Z.
Zhu
,
Y.
Wen
,
Q.
Zhang
,
J.
Zhang
,
Y.
Peng
,
H. N.
Alshareef
, and
X.
Zhang
, “
Spin filtering in epitaxial spinel films with nanoscale phase separation
,”
ACS Nano
11
,
5011
(
2017
).
3.
X.
Chen
,
X.
Zhang
,
M.-G.
Han
,
L.
Zhang
,
Y.
Zhu
,
X.
Xu
, and
X.
Hong
, “
Magnetotransport anomaly in room-temperature ferrimagnetic NiCo2O4 thin films
,”
Adv. Mater.
31
,
1805260
(
2019
).
4.
M.
Xue
,
X.
Chen
,
S.
Ding
,
Z.
Liang
,
Y.
Peng
,
X.
Li
,
L.
Zha
,
W.
Yang
,
J.
Han
,
S.
Liu
 et al, “
Transport anomaly in perpendicular magnetic anisotropic NiCo2O4 thin films with column-like phase separation
,”
ACS Appl. Electron. Mater.
2
,
3964
(
2020
).
5.
D.
Kan
,
L.
Xie
, and
Y.
Shimakawa
, “
Scaling of the anomalous Hall effect in perpendicularly magnetized epitaxial films of the ferrimagnet NiCo2O4
,”
Phys. Rev. B
104
,
134407
(
2021
).
6.
C.
Mellinger
,
J.
Waybright
,
X.
Zhang
,
C.
Schmidt
, and
X.
Xu
, “
Perpendicular magnetic anisotropy in conducting NiCo2O4 films from spin-lattice coupling
,”
Phys. Rev. B
101
,
014413
(
2020
).
7.
Y.
Shen
,
D.
Kan
,
I.-C.
Lin
,
M.-W.
Chu
,
I.
Suzuki
, and
Y.
Shimakawa
, “
Perpendicular magnetic tunnel junctions based on half-metallic NiCo2O4
,”
Appl. Phys. Lett.
117
,
042408
(
2020
).
8.
B.
Dieny
and
M.
Chshiev
, “
Perpendicular magnetic anisotropy at transition metal/oxide interfaces and applications
,”
Rev. Mod. Phys.
89
,
025008
(
2017
).
9.
J.
Zhang
,
X. G.
Zhang
, and
X. F.
Han
, “
Spinel oxides: Δ 1 spin-filter barrier for a class of magnetic tunnel junctions
,”
Appl. Phys. Lett.
100
,
222401
(
2012
).
10.
H.
Sukegawa
,
Y.
Miura
,
S.
Muramoto
,
S.
Mitani
,
T.
Niizeki
,
T.
Ohkubo
,
K.
Abe
,
M.
Shirai
,
K.
Inomata
, and
K.
Hono
, “
Enhanced tunnel magnetoresistance in a spinel oxide barrier with cation-site disorder
,”
Phys. Rev. B
86
,
184401
(
2012
).
11.
Y.
Miura
,
S.
Muramoto
,
K.
Abe
, and
M.
Shirai
, “
First-principles study of tunneling magnetoresistance in Fe/MgAl2O4/Fe(001) magnetic tunnel junctions
,”
Phys. Rev. B
86
,
024426
(
2012
).
12.
M.
Bibes
,
J. E.
Villegas
, and
A.
Barthelemy
, “
Ultrathin oxide films and interfaces for electronics and spintronics
,”
Adv. Phys.
60
,
5
(
2011
).
13.
P.
Silwal
,
L.
Miao
,
I.
Stern
,
X.
Zhou
,
J.
Hu
, and
D. H.
Kim
, “
Metal insulator transition with ferrimagnetic order in epitaxial thin films of spinel NiCo2O4
,”
Appl. Phys. Lett.
100
,
032102
(
2012
).
14.
P.
Silwal
,
L.
Miao
,
J.
Hu
,
L.
Spinu
,
D. H.
Kim
, and
D.
Talbayev
, “
Thickness dependent structural, magnetic, and electronic properties of the epitaxial films of transparent conducting oxide NiCo2O4
,”
J. Appl. Phys.
114
,
103704
(
2013
).
15.
K.
Dileep
,
B.
Loukya
,
P.
Silwal
,
A.
Gupta
, and
R.
Datta
, “
Probing optical band gaps at nanoscale from tetrahedral cation vacancy defects and variation of cation ordering in NiCo2O4 epitaxial thin films
,”
J. Phys. D
47
,
405001
(
2014
).
16.
Y.
Bitla
,
Y. Y.
Chin
,
J. C.
Lin
,
C. N.
Van
,
R.
Liu
,
Y.
Zhu
,
H. J.
Liu
,
Q.
Zhan
,
H. J.
Lin
,
C. T.
Chen
 et al, “
Origin of metallic behavior in NiCo2O4 ferrimagnet
,”
Sci. Rep.
5
,
15201
(
2015
).
17.
C. M.
Zhen
,
X. Z.
Zhang
,
W. G.
Wei
,
W. Z.
Guo
,
A.
Pant
,
X. S.
Xu
,
J.
Shen
,
L.
Ma
, and
D. L.
Hou
, “
Nanostructural origin of semiconductivity and large magnetoresistance in epitaxial NiCo2O4/Al2O3 thin films
,”
J. Phys. D
51
,
145308
(
2018
).
18.
Y.
Shen
,
D.
Kan
,
Z.
Tan
,
Y.
Wakabayashi
, and
Y.
Shimakawa
, “
Tuning of ferrimagnetism and perpendicular magnetic anisotropy in NiCo2O4 epitaxial films by the cation distribution
,”
Phys. Rev. B
101
,
094412
(
2020
).
19.
L.
Zhang
,
X.
Jiang
,
X.
Xu
, and
X.
Hong
, “
Abrupt enhancement of spin–orbit scattering time in ultrathin semimetallic SrIrO3 close to the metal–insulator transition
,”
APL Mater.
8
,
051108
(
2020
).
20.
R.
Scherwitzl
,
S.
Gariglio
,
M.
Gabay
,
P.
Zubko
,
M.
Gibert
, and
J. M.
Triscone
, “
Metal-insulator transition in ultrathin LaNiO3 films
,”
Phys. Rev. Lett.
106
,
246403
(
2011
).
21.
D.
Groenendijk
,
C.
Autieri
,
J.
Girovsky
,
M. C.
Martinez-Velarte
,
N.
Manca
,
G.
Mattoni
,
A.
Monteiro
,
N.
Gauquelin
,
J.
Verbeeck
, and
A. F.
Otte
, “
Spin-orbit semimetal SrIrO3 in the two-dimensional limit
,”
Phys. Rev. Lett.
119
,
256403
(
2017
).
22.
X.
Hong
,
A.
Posadas
, and
C. H.
Ahn
, “
Examining the screening limit of field effect devices via the metal-insulator transition
,”
Appl. Phys. Lett.
86
,
142501
(
2005
).
23.
P. J.
Metaxas
,
J. P.
Jamet
,
A.
Mougin
,
M.
Cormier
,
J.
Ferre
,
V.
Baltz
,
B.
Rodmacq
,
B.
Dieny
, and
R. L.
Stamps
, “
Creep and flow regimes of magnetic domain-wall motion in ultrathin Pt/Co/Pt films with perpendicular anisotropy
,”
Phys. Rev. Lett.
99
,
217208
(
2007
).
24.
J.
Xia
,
W.
Siemons
,
G.
Koster
,
M. R.
Beasley
, and
A.
Kapitulnik
, “
Critical thickness for itinerant ferromagnetism in ultrathin films of SrRuO3
,”
Phys. Rev. B
79
,
140407
(
2009
).
25.
M.
Huijben
,
L. W.
Martin
,
Y. H.
Chu
,
M. B.
Holcomb
,
P.
Yu
,
G.
Rijnders
,
D. H. A.
Blank
, and
R.
Ramesh
, “
Critical thickness and orbital ordering in ultrathin La0.7Sr0.3MnO3 films
,”
Phys. Rev. B
78
,
094413
(
2008
).
26.
M.
Bonilla
,
S.
Kolekar
,
Y.
Ma
,
H. C.
Diaz
,
V.
Kalappattil
,
R.
Das
,
T.
Eggers
,
H. R.
Gutierrez
,
M.-H.
Phan
, and
M.
Batzill
, “
Strong room-temperature ferromagnetism in VSe2 monolayers on van der Waals substrates
,”
Nat. Nanotechnol.
13
,
289
(
2018
).
27.
D. J.
O'Hara
,
T.
Zhu
,
A. H.
Trout
,
A. S.
Ahmed
,
Y. K.
Luo
,
C. H.
Lee
,
M. R.
Brenner
,
S.
Rajan
,
J. A.
Gupta
,
D. W.
McComb
 et al, “
Room temperature intrinsic ferromagnetism in epitaxial manganese selenide films in the monolayer limit
,”
Nano Lett.
18
,
3125
(
2018
).
28.
B.
Li
,
Z.
Wan
,
C.
Wang
,
P.
Chen
,
B.
Huang
,
X.
Cheng
,
Q.
Qian
,
J.
Li
,
Z.
Zhang
,
G.
Sun
 et al, “
Van der Waals epitaxial growth of air-stable CrSe2 nanosheets with thickness-tunable magnetic order
,”
Nat. Mater.
20
,
818
(
2021
).
29.
B.
Huang
,
G.
Clark
,
E.
Navarro-Moratalla
,
D. R.
Klein
,
R.
Cheng
,
K. L.
Seyler
,
D.
Zhong
,
E.
Schmidgall
,
M. A.
McGuire
,
D. H.
Cobden
 et al, “
Layer-dependent ferromagnetism in a van der Waals crystal down to the monolayer limit
,”
Nature
546
,
270
(
2017
).
30.
X.
Cai
,
T.
Song
,
N. P.
Wilson
,
G.
Clark
,
M.
He
,
X.
Zhang
,
T.
Taniguchi
,
K.
Watanabe
,
W.
Yao
,
D.
Xiao
 et al, “
Atomically thin CrCl3: An in-plane layered antiferromagnetic insulator
,”
Nano Lett.
19
,
3993
(
2019
).
31.
Z.
Fei
,
B.
Huang
,
P.
Malinowski
,
W.
Wang
,
T.
Song
,
J.
Sanchez
,
W.
Yao
,
D.
Xiao
,
X.
Zhu
,
A. F.
May
 et al, “
Two-dimensional itinerant ferromagnetism in atomically thin Fe3GeTe2
,”
Nat. Mater.
17
,
778
(
2018
).
32.
Y.
Deng
,
Y.
Yu
,
Y.
Song
,
J.
Zhang
,
N. Z.
Wang
,
Z.
Sun
,
Y.
Yi
,
Y. Z.
Wu
,
S.
Wu
,
J.
Zhu
 et al, “
Gate-tunable room-temperature ferromagnetism in two-dimensional Fe3GeTe2
,”
Nature
563
,
94
(
2018
).
33.
C.
Gong
,
L.
Li
,
Z.
Li
,
H.
Ji
,
A.
Stern
,
Y.
Xia
,
T.
Cao
,
W.
Bao
,
C.
Wang
,
Y.
Wang
 et al, “
Discovery of intrinsic ferromagnetism in two-dimensional van der Waals crystals
,”
Nature
546
,
265
(
2017
).
34.
A. K.
Geim
and
I. V.
Grigorieva
, “
Van der Waals heterostructures
,”
Nature
499
,
419
(
2013
).
35.
H. Y.
Hwang
,
Y.
Iwasa
,
M.
Kawasaki
,
B.
Keimer
,
N.
Nagaosa
, and
Y.
Tokura
, “
Emergent phenomena at oxide interfaces
,”
Nat. Mater.
11
,
103
(
2012
).
36.
X. G.
Chen
,
X.
Zhang
,
M. A.
Koten
,
H. H.
Chen
,
Z. Y.
Xiao
,
L.
Zhang
,
J. E.
Shield
,
P. A.
Dowben
, and
X.
Hong
, “
Interfacial charge engineering in ferroelectric-controlled Mott transistors
,”
Adv. Mater.
29
,
1701385
(
2017
).
37.
S.
Onoda
,
N.
Sugimoto
, and
N.
Nagaosa
, “
Quantum transport theory of anomalous electric, thermoelectric, and thermal Hall effects in ferromagnets
,”
Phys. Rev. B
77
,
165103
(
2008
).
38.
T.
Fukumura
,
H.
Toyosaki
,
K.
Ueno
,
M.
Nakano
,
T.
Yamasaki
, and
M.
Kawasaki
, “
A scaling relation of anomalous Hall effect in ferromagnetic semiconductors and metals
,”
Jpn. J. Appl. Phys., Part 2
46
,
L642
(
2007
).
39.
A. A.
Kovalev
,
J.
Sinova
, and
Y.
Tserkovnyak
, “
Anomalous Hall effect in disordered multiband metals
,”
Phys. Rev. Lett.
105
,
036601
(
2010
).
40.
S.
Onoda
,
N.
Sugimoto
, and
N.
Nagaosa
, “
Intrinsic versus extrinsic anomalous Hall effect in ferromagnets
,”
Phys. Rev. Lett.
97
,
126602
(
2006
).
41.
A. A.
Burkov
and
L.
Balents
, “
Anomalous Hall effect in ferromagnetic semiconductors in the hopping transport regime
,”
Phys. Rev. Lett.
91
,
057202
(
2003
).
42.
X.-J.
Liu
,
X.
Liu
, and
J.
Sinova
, “
Scaling of the anomalous Hall effect in the insulating regime
,”
Phys. Rev. B
84
,
165304
(
2011
).
43.
X.
Hong
,
S. H.
Cheng
,
C.
Herding
, and
J.
Zhu
, “
Colossal negative magnetoresistance in dilute fluorinated graphene
,”
Phys. Rev. B
83
,
085410
(
2011
).