We report the demonstration of growing two-dimensional (2D) hexagonal-AlN (h-AlN) on transition metal dichalcogenide (TMD) monolayers (MoS2, WS2, and WSe2) via van der Waals epitaxy by atomic layer deposition (ALD). Having atomically thin thickness and high theoretical carrier mobility, TMDs are attractive semiconductors for future dense and high-performance 3D IC, and 2D hexagonal boron nitride (h-BN) as a gate dielectric is known to significantly improve TMD device performance. However, h-BN growth requires 1000 °C temperature that is not compatible with CMOS fabrication, and ALD deposition of any high-k 2D insulator on TMD continues to be an elusive goal. The epitaxial 2D layered h-AlN by low-temperature ALD is characterized by synchrotron-based grazing-incidence wide-angle x-ray scattering and high-resolution transmission electron microscopy. In addition, we demonstrate the feasibility of using layered h-AlN as an interfacial layer between WS2 and ALD HfO2. The significantly better uniformity and smoothness of HfO2 than that directly deposited on TMD are desirable characteristics for TMD transistor applications.

Semiconducting two-dimensional (2D) material is one of the promising candidates as a channel material in optoelectronic devices1–3 and field-effect transistors (FETs) in future monolithic 3D ICs4–6 owing to their attractive intrinsic bandgap values, self-passivated surface, and atomic flatness. Even though the 2D transition metal dichalcogenide (TMD) materials have been widely studied, finding an attractive gate dielectric stack for TMD transistors has been challenging.7–9 To construct ultra-scaled TMD FETs, integrating nm-thin uniform high-k dielectric films is necessary for obtaining thin equivalent oxide thickness (EOT) and excellent channel electrostatic control. A few-nm thin atomic layer deposition (ALD) high-k HfO2 film has proven to be an excellent manufacturable gate dielectric stack for the most advanced Si FET.10–12 The ALD method based on self-limiting chemical reactions between the precursors and the reactive sites of the substrate surface is well suited for producing smooth and uniform films. However, previous research of dielectric oxide deposition by ALD on an inactive TMD surface often led to unsatisfactory coverage with pinholes and even uncovered areas.13,14 The surface coverages of HfO2 on TMD could be improved by forming a less-well-controlled seed layer15,16 or mild plasma treatments,41,42 which may damage the TMD surface. On the other hand, hexagonal boron nitride (h-BN) was widely used to demonstrate that a 2D gate dielectric material can enhance the mobility of carriers in the channel and the quality of the semiconductor–insulator interface of the 2D FET, as evidenced by better subthreshold swing.17,18 However, the h-BN layer is formed through chemical vapor deposition (CVD) at elevated temperatures above 1000 °C and then transferred onto TMDs using the exfoliation process.19–21 Therefore, a higher-k (than h-BN) 2D dielectric that can be ALD deposited on TMDs at the CMOS-technology compatible temperature as the gate dielectric or as the interfacial layer between TMD and ALD HfO2 would be ideal. h-AlN has an excellent lattice match with Mo(W)S2, and its dielectric constant of 8.73 is much higher than that of h-BN (∼4.7).

This study developed an ALD method to grow 2D h-AlN layers on top of the TMD's surface. Generally, the temperature for growing AlN films using ALD is between 150–300 °C.22,23 High-resolution transmission electron microscopy (HR-TEM) images of h-AlN grown on several TMDs show that h-AlN has layered structures, and the crystal quality is better when TMD and AlN lattice-constant mismatch is smaller. Based on the x-ray scattering results, the h-AlN layered structure has its hexagonal lattice aligned with the TMD lattice. Based on these observations, we believe that the AlN growth mechanism is van der Waals epitaxy (VDWE).24,25 Compared to ALD HfO2 directly on the TMD surface, we demonstrate that adding h-AlN as an IL has the advantage of notable improvement in the HfO2 roughness and uniformity. However, the electrical properties of the h-AlN/TMD interface still need to be studied.

This study reports h-AlN growth on various TMD materials (WS2, MoS2, and WSe2) using the plasma-enhanced ALD (PEALD) method. Before the AlN deposition, remote H2/N2 mixture plasma surface pretreatment on TMD was performed. The best grazing-incidence wide-angle x-ray scattering (GIWAXS) intensity and FWHM were achieved with equal N2 and H2 flow rates of 50  sccm, a plasma power of 30 W, and a time of 400 s as shown in Table I. Then, trimethylaluminum (TMA) and remote N2 plasma at 300 W were used as the precursors of Al and N. After AlN was formed, a TiN capping layer was in situ deposited using tetrakis(dimethylamido)titanium (TDMAT) and N2 plasma at 300 W to prevent oxidation. All ALD processes were performed at 250 °C. The AlN growth rate on TMD layers was 0.58–0.68 Å per cycle. We sought to elucidate the growth mechanism of the AlN growth on the TMDs surface by also preparing a reference sample of AlN grown on sapphire. The crystallographic properties of the layered h-AlN/TMDs were examined using synchrotron-based GIWAXS with the detector at 9.5 cm from the sample to access q∼5 Å−1 at Taiwan Photon Source (TPS) BL25A. The GIWAXS data were collected with an area detector. High-resolution transmission electron microscopy (HR-TEM) was used to probe the layered h-AlN/TMD microstructure and obtain atomic-scale images. The surface morphologies and roughness of the samples were examined with atomic force microscopy (AFM).

TABLE I.

The crystallinity of AlN growing on WS2 following pretreatments with various N2/H2 rations.

Sample conditionPre-treated gasGas flow (sccm)Plasma power/timePeak intensity/FWHM of GIWAXS
HfO2/AlN/WS2 N2/H2 100/0 30 W/400 s 39/0.023 
50/50 112/0.02 
25/75 61/0.019 
Sample conditionPre-treated gasGas flow (sccm)Plasma power/timePeak intensity/FWHM of GIWAXS
HfO2/AlN/WS2 N2/H2 100/0 30 W/400 s 39/0.023 
50/50 112/0.02 
25/75 61/0.019 

We performed calculations using the density functional theory (DFT) via Quantum ATK developed by Synopsys. The DFT calculations used the Perdew–Burke–Ernzerhof (PBE) exchange–correlation function and the PseuDojo-medium basis set. The nonlocal dispersive forces (the van der Waals force) were added into DFT calculation with the Grimme DFT-2D method. The HfO2/h-AlN/WS2 structure was modeled as stable four unit cells of m-HfO226 with orientation (110), h-AlN (1 to 4 layers), and monolayer WS2. The mesh cutoff was 120 Hartree, and Monkhorst–Pack k-points grids of 3 × 7 × 1 were used. The structure was relaxed along the z-direction. The force minimization was 5 meV/Å for all structure relaxations. For the study of the band structure and density of states, the Brillouin zone was sampled by 11 × 11 × 1 k-points.

Figure 1 presents cross-sectional HR-TEM images of TiN/AlN on WS2/sapphire, on MoS2/sapphire, on WSe2/sapphire, and on sapphire directly. The microstructure of the AlN film exhibited a 2D layered structure on the TMDs surface compared with that of amorphous growth on the sapphire surface. These films were grown by ALD in the same equipment under the same condition and at the same time. The growth rates of the layered h-AlN film on TMDs (0.58–0.68 Å per cycle) were slower than the growth rate of AlN on the sapphire substrate (0.88 Å per cycle), probably because the chemically inactive surface of TMDs allowed only vdW physisorption during layered h-AlN deposition on TMDs.27,28 The growth mode of the layered h-AlN film on TMD crystals may be similar to the Frank–van der Merwe (FM) mode29,30 in forming the layer-by-layer stacked structure shown in Figs. 1(a)–1(c). Figure 1(d) clarified that the structural features of layered h-AlN were due to TMD rather than the sapphire substrate. The layered h-AlN was also grown on the WS2/SiO2(quartz) substrate. Figure 2(a) presents the high-angle annular dark-field (HAADF)-TEM of the TiN/AlN/WS2/SiO2 structure. Each layer of the TiN/AlN/WS2/SiO2 structure is sharply identified. Figure 2(b) presents the HR-TEM image from a selected region highlighted in Fig. 2(a). Even though the SiO2 substrate is non-crystalline, AlN on WS2 still exhibits the layered feature. Figures 2(c)–2(i) present a spatial elemental mapping of Ti, N, Al, W, S, Si, and O in the TiN/AlN/WS2/SiO2 structure. The microscopy data clearly show that the layered AlN ordering results from crystal WS2, not the amorphous SiO2 substrate. Thus, the layered h-AlN growth on the van der Waals surface of TMD materials is VDWE growth. Epitaxial growth also requires a close lattice match between the deposited material and the substrate. In this work, TMD surface free energies were not much different;31–33 therefore, their lattice mismatch mainly influenced the layered h-AlN film growth on 2D crystals. The in-plane lattice constants of AlN, WS2, MoS2, and WSe2 are 3.13, 3.19, 3.19, and 3.33 Å, respectively, and the in-plane lattice mismatch between AlN and WS2, MoS2, and WSe2 is 1.88%, 1.88%, and 6.01%, respectively. Due to the relatively larger lattice mismatch between AlN and WSe2, the first layer of h-AlN on WSe2 was delaminated as a buffer layer in Fig. 1(c). In contrast to the layered h-AlN on TMDs, the growth mode of AlN directly on a sapphire substrate was amorphous, as shown in Fig. 1(d).

FIG. 1.

Cross-sectional HR-TEM images of TiN/AlN on (a) WS2, (b) MoS2, (c) WSe2, and (d) sapphire. All samples are made in one experiment. The layer structure of AlN indicates VDWE growth on all three TMDs.

FIG. 1.

Cross-sectional HR-TEM images of TiN/AlN on (a) WS2, (b) MoS2, (c) WSe2, and (d) sapphire. All samples are made in one experiment. The layer structure of AlN indicates VDWE growth on all three TMDs.

Close modal
FIG. 2.

The TEM characterization and energy dispersive x ray (EDX) chemical mapping of the TiN/AlN/WS2 structure. (a) Cross-sectional HAADF and (b) TEM image of the structure. EDX mapping of (c) Ti, (d) N, (e) Al, (f) W, (g) S, (h) Si, and (i) O.

FIG. 2.

The TEM characterization and energy dispersive x ray (EDX) chemical mapping of the TiN/AlN/WS2 structure. (a) Cross-sectional HAADF and (b) TEM image of the structure. EDX mapping of (c) Ti, (d) N, (e) Al, (f) W, (g) S, (h) Si, and (i) O.

Close modal

To verify these local microstructure observations, we utilized GIWAXS measurement to investigate the low-dimension materials' surface structure and provided structural morphology information over the entire sample.34–36 Synchrotron GIWAXS was employed to analyze the structured features of the TiN/layered h-AlN/TMD stacks. The measurement geometry of GIWAXS is shown in Fig. 3(a). The sample is illuminated under a grazing-incidence angle, and our coordinate system is such that the x–y plane is the sample plane, and the x-axis lies in the scattering plane. Figures 3(b)–3(d) present the 2D reciprocal space map (on the left) and scattered intensity profile (on the right) of TiN/AlN on WS2/sapphire, on MoS2/sapphire, and on WSe2/sapphire, respectively. As seen from the reciprocal space map, the vertical stripe along the crystal truncation rod (CTR) of these samples shows that the crystalline morphology of layered h-AlN is similar to the layered structure of TMDs underneath. The overlapped stripe pattern of layered h-AlN and Mo(W)S2 shows that the layered h-AlN crystal growth followed the lateral facet of (101¯0) Mo(W)S2 in Figs. 3(b) and 3(c). The structural features of MoS2, WS2, and WSe2 by GIWAXS measurement are presented in supplementary material note 1. In contrast, the AlN/WSe2 sample exhibits two individually streak lines at positions 2.18 and 2.29 of qr, indicating that the (101¯0) layered h-AlN spacing is smaller than that of WSe2, although the layered h-AlN crystals are also growing along the [101¯0] direction in Fig. 2(d).

FIG. 3.

(a) Illustration of the TiN/AlN/TMD sample orientation with respect to the GIWAXS measurement setup. The grazing angle (θ) was 0.05°, and the exposure time was 10 s/sample. The 2D GIWAXS profile (on the left) and scattered intensity profile (on the right) of the (b) TiN/AlN/WS2, (c)-/MoS2, and (d)-/WSe2 samples, where the data of the scattered intensity were collected along qr at qz = 0.

FIG. 3.

(a) Illustration of the TiN/AlN/TMD sample orientation with respect to the GIWAXS measurement setup. The grazing angle (θ) was 0.05°, and the exposure time was 10 s/sample. The 2D GIWAXS profile (on the left) and scattered intensity profile (on the right) of the (b) TiN/AlN/WS2, (c)-/MoS2, and (d)-/WSe2 samples, where the data of the scattered intensity were collected along qr at qz = 0.

Close modal

To gain more insight into the layered h-AlN spacing on TMDs where |q| = 2π/dhkl spacing and dhkl spacing is the distance between the parallel planes of atoms, one may examine the (101¯0) layered h-AlN spacing of TiN/AlN on WS2/sapphire, on MoS2/sapphire, and on WSe2/sapphire in the scattering profile of Figs. 3(b)–3(d), and they are 2.76, 2.78, and 2.74 Å, respectively. The lateral facet of (101¯0) layered h-AlN spacing on three TMDs is slightly larger than that of the theoretical value of h-AlN (2.71 Å).37 This suggests that the layered h-AlN crystal grown on TMD is slightly tensile strained. The layered h-III-nitride materials have been extensively studied using theoretical calculations. When III-nitride materials become thinner, the internal electrostatic field problem was overcome, resulting in lower formation energy of the hexagonal structure.38,39 From the thermodynamics point of view, the cohesive energy of a hexagonal structure is lower than that of a wurtzite structure when the thickness of III-nitride is thin and the bonding type changes from the sp3 to sp2 hybridization, resulting in the preference of each ion for the trigonal planar configuration.39,40 Akiyama et al.41 calculated the relative stability between the hexagonal and wurtzite structures of III-nitride materials as a function of the layer thickness and found h-AlN favored below 13 monolayers. It is consistent with our experimental results of the layered h-AlN structure on TMDs. In addition, the strain effect on h-AlN had been studied by Wu et al.42 Tensile strain can substantially stabilize the hexagonal symmetry of the h-AlN multilayer.

Figure 4 presents the microstructure and topography of HfO2/WS2/sapphire and HfO2/layered h-AlN/WS2/sapphire structures, in which hafnium oxide (HfO2) was deposited by ALD using tetrakis(dimethylamido)hafnium (TDMAH) and H2O as precursors at 250 °C with Ar carrier gas. In the HfO2/WS2/sapphire structure, the amorphous HfO2 exhibited a non-uniform granular structure shown in Fig. 4(a) and a HfO2 surface roughness of about 1.08 nm. In contrast, the amorphous HfO2 layer was more uniformly grown on the layered h-AlN/WS2 surface. The layered h-AlN/WS2 structure was not degraded by HfO2 growth in Fig. 4(b). The ordered structure of layered h-AlN/WS2 remained intact, and the GIWAXS data were presented in supplementary material note 2. The shape of grains exhibited a hexagonal pattern in Fig. 4(d), which confirmed our GIWAXS analysis that the layered h-AlN grains followed the underlying WS2 crystal. More importantly, HfO2 on the WS2 sample was granular, while HfO2 on the layered h-AlN grain surface was uniform. The roughness of the HfO2/AlN/WS2 structure is ∼0.17 nm, which is less than that of HfO2/WS2 by about six times. These results suggest that the insertion of layered h-AlN as an interfacial layer between the high-k dielectric and pristine TMD channels can solve the coverage and roughness problem of high-k oxide deposition on TMDs. Finally, we theoretically examined the stability of the HfO2/h-AlN/WS2 structure with DFT calculations. Figure 5 shows the adsorption energy as a function of the number of h-AlN layers. The adsorption energy between h-AlN and WS2 (green line) was consistent with the van der Waals interaction,29–31 which was lower than the HfO2/WS2 structure (black dash line), indicating that the interface of h-AlN and WS2 maintained a certain interaction distance. Compared to the h-AlN/WS2 interface, the adsorption energy between HfO2 and h-AlN (red line) is much larger when the number of h-AlN layers was more than a monolayer, i.e., the adhesion of HfO2 on the h-AlN surface is strong. Importantly, the van der Waals interaction between WS2 and h-AlN was maintained even with HfO2 stacked on top of h-AlN (blue line) when the number of h-AlN layers is two or three.

FIG. 4.

Cross-sectional HR-TEM image of (a) HfO2/WS2 and (b) HfO2/AlN/WS2 structures. AFM morphology of (c) HfO2/WS2 and (d) HfO2/AlN/WS2 surfaces. The inset of figure (c) shows the 3D image of HfO2/WS2.

FIG. 4.

Cross-sectional HR-TEM image of (a) HfO2/WS2 and (b) HfO2/AlN/WS2 structures. AFM morphology of (c) HfO2/WS2 and (d) HfO2/AlN/WS2 surfaces. The inset of figure (c) shows the 3D image of HfO2/WS2.

Close modal
FIG. 5.

The adsorption energy calculation of the h-AlN/WS2 (green line), HfO2/h-AlN (red line), HfO2+h-AlN/WS2 (blue line), and HfO2/WS2 (black dashed line) interfaces.

FIG. 5.

The adsorption energy calculation of the h-AlN/WS2 (green line), HfO2/h-AlN (red line), HfO2+h-AlN/WS2 (blue line), and HfO2/WS2 (black dashed line) interfaces.

Close modal

In conclusion, this work clearly demonstrated layered hexagonal-AlN epitaxial deposition on monolayer TMDs by low-temperature PEALD. The growth mechanism of the layered h-AlN on TMD is van der Waals epitaxy and is facilitated by a close lattice match between layered h-AlN and TMDs. Synchrotron-based GIWAXS measurement revealed that layered h-AlN formed a 2D hexagonal lattice followed by the TMD lattice. We also demonstrated ALD HfO2 deposition on layered h-AlN (as an IL)/TMD while leaving the van der Waals interface between h-AlN and TMD intact. This makes ALD h-AlN an interesting candidate for the gate dielectric or an interfacial layer of TMD transistors. The electrical property of the h-AlN/TMD interface still needs to be studied.

See the supplementary material for the structural features of MoS2, WS2, and WSe2 monolayer, and the HfO2/h-AlN/WS2 structure.

This work was financially supported by the “Center for the Semiconductor Technology Research” from The Featured Areas Research Center Program within the framework of the Higher Education Sprout Project by the Ministry of Education (MOE) in Taiwan and also supported in part by the Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan, under Grant MOST 111-2634-F-A49-008. The authors thank Dr. Bang-Hao Huang, MSSCORPS CO., LTD, for the HR-TEM analyses.

The authors have no conflicts to disclose.

The data that support the findings of this study are available within the article and its supplementary material.

1.
T.
Pham
,
G.
Li
,
E.
Bekyarova
,
M. E.
Itkis
, and
A.
Mulchandani
, “
MoS2-based optoelectronic gas sensor with sub-parts-per-billion limit of NO2 gas detection
,”
ACS Nano
13
(
3
),
3196
3205
(
2019
).
2.
K.
Shu
,
W.
Gao
,
F.
Wan
,
S.
Yang
,
Z.
Dan
,
L.
Wu
,
Q.
Zhao
,
C.
Xue
,
N.
Huo
, and
J.
Li
, “
High-performance broadband photodetectors based on n-MoS2/p-Ge0.9Sn0.1 heterojunctions
,”
ACS Appl. Electron. Mater.
3
(
7
),
3218
3225
(
2021
).
3.
D.
Lee
,
S.
Kim
,
Y.
Kim
, and
J. H.
Cho
, “
One-transistor–one-transistor (1T1T) optoelectronic nonvolatile MoS2 memory cell with nondestructive read-out
,”
ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces
9
(
31
),
26357
26362
(
2017
).
4.
T.
Li
,
W.
Guo
,
L.
Ma
,
W.
Li
,
Z.
Yu
,
Z.
Han
,
S.
Gao
,
L.
Liu
,
D.
Fan
,
Z.
Wang
,
Y.
Yang
,
W.
Lin
,
Z.
Luo
,
X.
Chen
,
N.
Dai
,
X.
Tu
,
D.
Pan
,
Y.
Yao
,
P.
Wang
,
Y.
Nie
,
J.
Wang
,
Y.
Shi
, and
X.
Wang
, “
Epitaxial growth of wafer-scale molybdenum disulfide semiconductor single crystals on sapphire
,”
Nat. Nanotechnol.
16
(
11
),
1201
1207
(
2021
).
5.
P.-C.
Shen
,
C.
Su
,
Y.
Lin
,
A.-S.
Chou
,
C.-C.
Cheng
,
J.-H.
Park
,
M.-H.
Chiu
,
A.-Y.
Lu
,
H.-L.
Tang
,
M. M.
Tavakoli
,
G.
Pitner
,
X.
Ji
,
Z.
Cai
,
N.
Mao
,
J.
Wang
,
V.
Tung
,
J.
Li
,
J.
Bokor
,
A.
Zettl
,
C.-I.
Wu
,
T.
Palacios
,
L.-J.
Li
, and
J.
Kong
, “
Ultralow contact resistance between semimetal and monolayer semiconductors
,”
Nature
593
(
7858
),
211
217
(
2021
).
6.
P.
Wu
and
J.
Appenzeller
, “
Artificial sub-60 millivolts/decade switching in a metal–insulator–metal–insulator–semiconductor transistor without a ferroelectric component
,”
ACS Nano
15
(
3
),
5158
5164
(
2021
).
7.
X.
Liu
,
D.
Wang
,
K.-H.
Kim
,
K.
Katti
,
J.
Zheng
,
P.
Musavigharavi
,
J.
Miao
,
E. A.
Stach
,
R. H.
Olsson
, and
D.
Jariwala
, “
Post-CMOS compatible aluminum scandium nitride/2D channel ferroelectric field-effect-transistor memory
,”
Nano Lett.
21
(
9
),
3753
3761
(
2021
).
8.
M. C.
Chen
,
C. Y.
Lin
,
L.
Kai-Hsin
,
L. J.
Li
,
C. H.
Chen
,
C.
Cheng-Hao
,
L.
Ming-Dao
,
Y. J.
Chen
,
Y. F.
Hou
,
C. H.
Lin
,
C. C.
Chen
,
B. W.
Wu
,
C. S.
Wu
,
I.
Yang
,
Y. J.
Lee
,
Y.
Wen-Kuan
,
T.
Wang
,
F. L.
Yang
, and
C.
Hu
, “
Hybrid Si/TMD 2D electronic double channels fabricated using solid CVD few-layer-MoS2 stacking for Vth matching and CMOS-compatible 3DFETs
,” in
IEEE International Electron Devices Meeting
(
IEEE
,
2014
).
9.
Y.
Pan
,
H.
Yin
,
K.
Huang
,
Z.
Zhang
,
Q.
Zhang
,
K.
Jia
,
Z.
Wu
,
K.
Luo
,
J.
Yu
,
J.
Li
,
W.
Wang
, and
T.
Ye
, “
Novel 10-nm gate length MoS2 transistor fabricated on Si fin substrate
,”
IEEE J. Electron Devices Soc.
7
,
483
488
(
2019
).
10.
A.
Ogawa
,
K.
Iwamoto
,
H.
Ota
,
Y.
Morita
,
M.
Ikeda
,
T.
Nabatame
, and
A.
Toriumi
, “
0.6 nm-EOT high-k gate stacks with HfSiOx interfacial layer grown by solid-phase reaction between HfO2 and Si substrate
,”
Microelectron. Eng.
84
(
9
),
1861
1864
(
2007
).
11.
H.
Kang
,
S.
Kim
,
J.
Choi
,
J.
Kim
,
H.
Jeon
, and
C.
Bae
, “
Effects of remote plasma pre-oxidation of Si substrates on the characteristics of ALD-deposited HfO2 gate dielectrics
,”
Electrochem. Solid-State Lett.
9
(
6
),
G211
(
2006
).
12.
M. S.
Kavrik
,
E.
Thomson
,
E.
Chagarov
,
K.
Tang
,
S. T.
Ueda
,
V.
Hou
,
T.
Aoki
,
M.
Kim
,
B.
Fruhberger
,
Y.
Taur
,
P. C.
McIntyre
, and
A. C.
Kummel
, “
Ultralow defect density at sub-0.5 nm HfO2/SiGe interfaces via selective oxygen scavenging
,”
ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces
10
(
36
),
30794
30802
(
2018
).
13.
H.
Kim
,
T.
Park
,
S.
Park
,
M.
Leem
,
W.
Ahn
,
H.
Lee
,
C.
Lee
,
E.
Lee
,
S.-J.
Jeong
,
S.
Park
,
Y.
Kim
, and
H.
Kim
, “
Ultrathin monolithic HfO2 formed by Hf-seeded atomic layer deposition on MoS2: Film characteristics and its transistor application
,”
Thin Solid Films
673
,
112
118
(
2019
).
14.
T.
Park
,
H.
Kim
,
M.
Leem
,
W.
Ahn
,
S.
Choi
,
J.
Kim
,
J.
Uh
,
K.
Kwon
,
S.-J.
Jeong
,
S.
Park
,
Y.
Kim
, and
H.
Kim
, “
Atomic layer deposition of Al2O3 on MoS2, WS2, WSe2, h-BN: Surface coverage adsorption energy
,”
RSC Adv.
7
(
2
),
884
889
(
2017
).
15.
H.
Zhang
,
D.
Chiappe
,
J.
Meersschaut
,
T.
Conard
,
A.
Franquet
,
T.
Nuytten
,
M.
Mannarino
,
I.
Radu
,
W.
Vandervorst
, and
A.
Delabie
, “
Nucleation and growth mechanisms of Al2O3 atomic layer deposition on synthetic polycrystalline MoS2
,”
J. Chem. Phys.
146
(
5
),
052810
(
2017
).
16.
H.
Zhang
,
G.
Arutchelvan
,
J.
Meersschaut
,
A.
Gaur
,
T.
Conard
,
H.
Bender
,
D.
Lin
,
I.
Asselberghs
,
M.
Heyns
,
I.
Radu
,
W.
Vandervorst
, and
A.
Delabie
, “
MoS2 functionalization with a sub-nm Thin SiO2 layer for atomic layer deposition of high-κ dielectrics
,”
Chem. Mater.
29
(
16
),
6772
6780
(
2017
).
17.
M.-K.
Joo
,
B. H.
Moon
,
H.
Ji
,
G. H.
Han
,
H.
Kim
,
G.
Lee
,
S. C.
Lim
,
D.
Suh
, and
Y. H.
Lee
, “
Electron excess doping and effective Schottky barrier reduction on the MoS2/h-BN heterostructure
,”
Nano Lett.
16
(
10
),
6383
6389
(
2016
).
18.
M.-K.
Joo
,
B. H.
Moon
,
H.
Ji
,
G. H.
Han
,
H.
Kim
,
G.
Lee
,
S. C.
Lim
,
D.
Suh
, and
Y. H.
Lee
, “
Understanding Coulomb scattering mechanism in monolayer MoS2 channel in the presence of h-BN buffer layer
,”
ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces
9
(
5
),
5006
5013
(
2017
).
19.
T.-A.
Chen
,
C.-P.
Chuu
,
C.-C.
Tseng
,
C.-K.
Wen
,
H. S. P.
Wong
,
S.
Pan
,
R.
Li
,
T.-A.
Chao
,
W.-C.
Chueh
,
Y.
Zhang
,
Q.
Fu
,
B. I.
Yakobson
,
W.-H.
Chang
, and
L.-J.
Li
, “
Wafer-scale single-crystal hexagonal boron nitride monolayers on Cu (111)
,”
Nature
579
(
7798
),
219
223
(
2020
).
20.
G.
Pande
,
J.-Y.
Siao
,
W.-L.
Chen
,
C.-J.
Lee
,
R.
Sankar
,
Y.-M.
Chang
,
C.-D.
Chen
,
W.-H.
Chang
,
F.-C.
Chou
, and
M.-T.
Lin
, “
Ultralow Schottky barriers in hexagonal boron nitride-encapsulated monolayer WSe2 tunnel field-effect transistors
,”
ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces
12
(
16
),
18667
18673
(
2020
).
21.
T.
Knobloch
,
Y. Y.
Illarionov
,
F.
Ducry
,
C.
Schleich
,
S.
Wachter
,
K.
Watanabe
,
T.
Taniguchi
,
T.
Mueller
,
M.
Waltl
,
M.
Lanza
,
M. I.
Vexler
,
M.
Luisier
, and
T.
Grasser
, “
The performance limits of hexagonal boron nitride as an insulator for scaled CMOS devices based on two-dimensional materials
,”
Nat. Electron.
4
(
2
),
98
108
(
2021
).
22.
S.
Liu
,
M.
Peng
,
C.
Hou
,
Y.
He
,
M.
Li
, and
X.
Zheng
, “
PEALD-grown crystalline AlN films on Si (100) with sharp interface and good uniformity
,”
Nanoscale Res. Lett.
12
,
279
(
2017
).
23.
C.
Ozgit
,
I.
Donmez
,
M.
Alevli
, and
N.
Biyikli
, “
Self-limiting low-temperature growth of crystalline AlN thin films by plasma-enhanced atomic layer deposition
,”
Thin Solid Films
520
,
2750
2755
(
2012
).
24.
A.
Koma
, “
Van der Waals epitaxy a new epitaxial growth method for a highly lattice-mismatched system
,”
Thin Solid Films
216
,
72
76
(
1992
).
25.
L. A.
Walsh
and
C. L.
Hinkle
, “
van der Waals epitaxy: 2D materials and topological insulators
,”
Appl. Mater. Today
9
,
504
515
(
2017
).
26.
R.
Batra
,
H. D.
Tran
, and
R.
Ramprasad
, “
Stabilization of metastable phases in hafnia owing to surface energy effects
,”
Appl. Phys. Lett.
108
(
17
),
172902
(
2016
).
27.
J.
Liao
,
B.
Sa
,
J.
Zhou
,
R.
Ahuja
, and
Z.
Sun
, “
Design of high-efficiency visible-light photocatalysts for water splitting: MoS2/AlN(GaN) heterostructures
,”
J. Phys. Chem. C
118
(
31
),
17594
17599
(
2014
).
28.
F.
Yang
,
X.
Cao
,
J.
Han
,
Y.
Tao
,
Z.
Zhuo
,
L.
Zhang
,
Z.
Zhu
,
W.
Liu
, and
Y.
Dai
, “
First principles study on modulating electronic and optical properties with h-BN intercalation in AlN/MoS2 heterostructure
,”
Nanotechnol.
33
(
3
),
035708
(
2022
).
29.
K. D.
Gilroy
,
A.
Ruditskiy
,
H.-C.
Peng
,
D.
Qin
, and
Y.
Xia
, “
Bimetallic nanocrystals: Syntheses, properties, and applications
,”
Chem. Rev.
116
(
18
),
10414
10472
(
2016
).
30.
M.
Wang
,
T.-J.
Ko
,
M. S.
Shawkat
,
S. S.
Han
,
E.
Okogbue
,
H.-S.
Chung
,
T.-S.
Bae
,
S.
Sattar
,
J.
Gil
,
C.
Noh
,
K. H.
Oh
,
Y.
Jung
,
J. A.
Larsson
, and
Y.
Jung
, “
Wafer-scale growth of 2D PtTe2 with layer orientation tunable high electrical conductivity and superior hydrophobicity
,”
ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces
12
(
9
),
10839
10851
(
2020
).
31.
A. P. S.
Gaur
,
S.
Sahoo
,
M.
Ahmadi
,
S. P.
Dash
,
M. J. F.
Guinel
, and
R. S.
Katiyar
, “
Surface energy engineering for tunable wettability through controlled synthesis of MoS2
,”
Nano Lett.
14
(
8
),
4314
4321
(
2014
).
32.
K.
Godin
,
K.
Kang
,
S.
Fu
, and
E.-H.
Yang
, “
Increased monolayer domain size and patterned growth of tungsten disulfide through controlling surface energy of substrates
,”
J. Phys. D
49
(
32
),
325304
(
2016
).
33.
M.
Annamalai
,
K.
Gopinadhan
,
S. A.
Han
,
S.
Saha
,
H. J.
Park
,
E. B.
Cho
,
B.
Kumar
,
A.
Patra
,
S.-W.
Kim
, and
T.
Venkatesan
, “
Surface energy and wettability of van der Waals structures
,”
Nanoscale
8
(
10
),
5764
5770
(
2016
).
34.
X.
Liu
,
I.
Balla
,
H.
Bergeron
,
G. P.
Campbell
,
M. J.
Bedzyk
, and
M. C.
Hersam
, “
Rotationally commensurate growth of MoS2 on epitaxial graphene
,”
ACS Nano
10
(
1
),
1067
1075
(
2016
).
35.
D.
Moseguí González
,
C. J.
Schaffer
,
S.
Pröller
,
J.
Schlipf
,
L.
Song
,
S.
Bernstorff
,
E. M.
Herzig
, and
P.
Müller-Buschbaum
, “
Codependence between crystalline and photovoltage evolutions in P3HT:PCBM solar cells probed with in-Operando GIWAXS
,”
ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces
9
(
4
),
3282
3287
(
2017
).
36.
C. D.
Liman
,
S.
Choi
,
D. W.
Breiby
,
J. E.
Cochran
,
M. F.
Toney
,
E. J.
Kramer
, and
M. L.
Chabinyc
, “
Two-dimensional GIWAXS reveals a transient crystal phase in solution-processed thermally converted tetrabenzoporphyrin
,”
J. Phys. Chem. B
117
(
46
),
14557
14567
(
2013
).
37.
See https://materialsproject.org/materials/mp-661/ for information about h-AlN d-spacing.
38.
H. L.
Zhuang
,
A. K.
Singh
, and
R. G.
Hennig
, “
Computational discovery of single-layer III-V materials
,”
Phys. Rev. B
87
(
16
),
165415
(
2013
).
39.
Y.
Jia
,
Z.
Shi
,
W.
Hou
,
H.
Zang
,
K.
Jiang
,
Y.
Chen
,
S.
Zhang
,
Z.
Qi
,
T.
Wu
,
X.
Sun
, and
D.
Li
, “
Elimination of the internal electrostatic field in two-dimensional GaN-based semiconductors
,”
npj 2D Mater. Appl.
4
(
1
),
31
(
2020
).
40.
C. L.
Freeman
,
F.
Claeyssens
,
N. L.
Allan
, and
J. H.
Harding
, “
Graphitic nanofilms as precursors to wurtzite films: Theory
,”
Phys. Rev. Lett.
96
(
6
),
066102
(
2006
).
41.
T.
Akiyama
,
Y.
Tsuboi
,
K.
Nakamura
, and
T.
Ito
, “
An ab initio study for the formation of two-dimensional III-nitride compound ultrathin films: Effects of Ag(1 1 1) substrate
,”
J. Cryst. Growth
511
,
89
92
(
2019
).
42.
D.
Wu
,
M. G.
Lagally
, and
F.
Liu
, “
Stabilizing graphitic thin films of wurtzite materials by epitaxial strain
,”
Phys. Rev. Lett.
107
(
23
),
236101
(
2011
).

Supplementary Material