Introducing ferroelectricity to two-dimensional van der Waals (vdW) materials such as graphene, transition metal dichalcogenides, and black phosphorous presents a promising route for developing high-speed and low-power nanoelectronics. This Perspective reviews two actively pursued materials strategies, ferroelectric/vdW heterostructures and vdW ferroelectric materials. The topics discussed include their application potential and performance limitations as memory, logic, sensing, and optical devices, as well as the challenges and outlook of the field.

While the Si-based semiconductor industry has rapidly approached the post-Moore's law regime,1 two-dimensional (2D) van der Waals (vdW) materials such as graphene, transition metal dichalcogenide (TMDC), and black phosphorus have emerged as a promising material platform for developing nanoelectronics that can transcend the fundamental performance limits of the complementary metal-oxide-semiconductor (CMOS) technology.2,3 These layered materials possess atomic thickness, low surface defect states due to the lack of dangling bonds, and potentially high mobility. Their easily stackable nature makes them versatile building blocks for designing complex device architectures,4 either by combining different vdW materials or by interfacing the 2D layer with other functional materials with distinct crystal structures. Among them, devices harnessing ferroelectricity offer a promising route for realizing low-power, high-speed operation and reconfigurable functionalities.5 

Ferroelectric order is manifested in noncentrosymmetric materials with a double-well free energy profile emerging below the Curie temperature (TC), which results in a spontaneous polarization that can be switched by an external electric field higher than the coercive field Ec (Fig. 1). The polarization can be the order parameter for the paraelectric-ferroelectric phase transition (proper ferroelectrics)6,7 or be coupled with another leading order parameter associated with certain non-ferroelectric lattice distortion or charge/spin ordering states (improper ferroelectrics).8,9 There are also scenarios where different ferroic orders are induced by the same lattice distortion modes (hybrid improper ferroelectricity), which allow the realization of strongly coupled multiferroics.10 Historically, the development of ferroelectric-based nanoelectronics is strongly intertwined with the pursuit of new ferroelectric nano-materials and high quality ferroelectric thin films and heterostructures.6,7 The polarization can be utilized directly as the state variable or be coupled with the electronic properties of a neighboring material, e.g., in a ferroelectric field-effect transistor (FeFET) structure,5 to represent the “on” and “off” states in memory and logic devices. As the data bit can be sustained even when the device is turned off, FeFET-based nonvolatile memory requires a lower operation power than the volatile memory technologies, e.g., dynamic random-access memory (RAM) and static RAM. The fact that the polarization can be voltage-controlled also makes it more energy efficient than other nonvolatile memories that require high current switching (e.g., magnetic RAM and spin-transfer torque RAM).11 Leveraging the unique negative curvature in the free energy landscape, ferroelectrics have also been exploited to design steep slope FETs.12 Ferroelectric-based 2D FETs, thus, have the potential to overcome the power scaling crisis faced by the semiconductor industry.1 Controlling the ferroelectric polarization at the nanoscale can further lead to programmable junction devices for electronic and optoelectronic applications. As ferroelectrics exhibit piezoelectricity and pyroelectricity, the polarization control can also be achieved via temperature or strain, enabling versatile device operation schemes. The atomically thin nature of the 2D materials, on the other hand, offers unique opportunities for sensing the variation of the ferroelectric order parameter induced by external electrical, mechanical, and thermal stimuli, as well as serving as transparent, flexible electrodes for the ferroelectric layer. For 2D materials that lack inversion symmetry, the polar properties can also be coupled with those of the ferroelectrics, which can facilitate the design of unconventional mechanical13 and smart optical14 devices.

FIG. 1.

Schematics of key attributes of ferroelectrics and potential applications for 2D vdW materials enabled by ferroelectricity. IF: improper ferroelectricity. HIF: hybrid improper ferroelectricity.

FIG. 1.

Schematics of key attributes of ferroelectrics and potential applications for 2D vdW materials enabled by ferroelectricity. IF: improper ferroelectricity. HIF: hybrid improper ferroelectricity.

Close modal

To date, extensive research has been carried out on ferroelectric/vdW heterostructures, leveraging their interfacial synergy to realize a wide range of electronic, optical, and energy applications,5 while new opportunities emerge upon the newly discovered vdW materials with intrinsic ferroelectric order.15–17 This Perspective reviews the recent advancements in both materials systems, outlining the progress in developing a wide range of nanoelectronic applications, including high-performance nonvolatile memories, steep slope transistors, programmable junctions, charge and pressure sensors, photodiodes, and smart optical filters, as well as discussing the challenges and outlook of the field.

In ferroelectric/vdW heterostructures, an appealing interfacial synergy is the direct coupling between the ferroelectric polarization field and the doping level in the layered 2D material. The large spontaneous polarization, combined with the high dielectric constant of the ferroelectric, can render highly efficient doping change that conventional dielectrics cannot offer.18–20 A wide range of ferroelectrics have been investigated as the gate of transistor devices, including complex oxides19–39 such as the ABO3 type perovskites Pb(Zr,Ti)O3, BaTiO3, and BiFeO3, ferroelectric copolymer poly(vinylidene fluoride-co-trifluoroethylene) or P(VDF-TrFE),40–61 and HfO2-based binary oxides.62–68 Interestingly, ferroelectric 2D semiconductors have been exploited as both gate69–72 and channel materials in the50,73,74 FET structure.

For FeFET devices, switching the polarization direction can lead to bi-stable conduction states in the channel, which forms the basis for constructing a nonvolatile memory. Early research has focused on the ferroelectric/graphene hybrid structures.5 As graphene has no bandgap, the on-off ratio of the channel resistance or current upon polarization switching is normally less than 10 in these devices.33 A substantially enhanced on-off ratio has been achieved by working with semiconducting 2D channels, including MoS2,27–29,41,45–48 MoTe2,37,59 WSe2,29,57α-In2Se3,73 and black phosphorus.35,43 For example, a nonvolatile on-off ratio of about 105 has been observed in MoS2 top-gated by P(VDF-TrFE)48 and black phosphorus with a PZT back-gate.35 Yap et al. demonstrated nonvolatile switching in MoS2 FETs with a 16 nm Al doped HfO2 gate, showing that this device concept can be compatible with the CMOS technology.62 One of the major device challenges, however, is to control the interfacial charge dynamics due to adsorbates and defect-induced trapping,5 which can lead to fast relaxation of the memory state and even result in anti-hysteresis in devices with ferroelectric back-gate.21,22,25–28,31–33 Nonvolatile hysteresis has also been observed in Al2O3-gated MoS2 FET by biasing an externally connected PZT capacitor, which avoids the direct interface between the ferroelectric and the 2D layer.75 In addition to direct doping control, electrical field control has also been exploited to engineer the strain state in a PMN-PT gate, which, in turn, switches a neighboring MoTe2 channel between the semimetallic and semiconducting phases, leading to a nonvolatile switching of channel conductance by a factor of 107.37 

Besides the powerful doping capacity, a ferroelectric gate offers another distinct advantage over conventional dielectric: the polarization can be controlled at the nanoscale through domain patterning, leading to programmable functionalities in the 2D channel. Xiao et al. showed that poling a P(VDF-TrFE) top-gate into two adjacent domains with opposite out-of-plane polarization can lead to a homojunction in the MoS2 channel underneath the ferroelectric domain wall (DW), so that the device can be reconfigured between the Ohmic conduction and Schottky-diode type rectifying IV characteristic via domain writing [Figs. 2(a) and 2(b)].45 The Schottky barrier originates from the Fermi level difference between the regions doped via the polarization up and down domains and can be changed continuously by varying the global back-gate voltage. A similar approach has been exploited to tune the work function difference between the contact electrode and the MoS2 channel,46 pointing to a promising contact engineering approach for TMDC devices.76 Selective contact doping further leads to reversible polarity for the rectifying IV [Figs. 2(c) and 2(d)]. Lv et al. used this approach to realize pn diodes and npn bipolar phototransistors in MoS2, which exhibit a responsivity of ∼12 A W−1 and a detectivity of over 1013 Jones at a fast response time of 20 μs.47 Various lateral homojunctions have been demonstrated in MoTe2 devices, facilitating the design of high performance photodetector/photovoltaic devices.59–61 As the photoluminescence (PL) response of the 2D semiconductors can also be tuned by the polarization,14,77,78 Wu et al. proposed a prototype nonvolatile memory that operates upon electrical writing-optical readout, eliminating the need for the source/drain electrodes.59 The ferroelectric domain patterning can be utilized to define arbitrary conduction paths in the 2D channel.36 It has been suggested that using periodically poled domain structures, it is possible to construct graphene-based terahertz plasmonic waveguides.79 In addition to the electrical approach, it is also possible to write the domain by applying mechanical stress through the vdW layer via the flexoelectric effect.80 

FIG. 2.

(a) Schematic of a MoS2 FET with a SiO2 back-gate and a P(VDF-TrFE) top-gate. (b) Monolayer MoS2 exhibits rectified IV as the top-gate is polarized into the half Pup-half Pdown domain. The solid line is a fit to the thermionic emission model. Reproduced with permission from Xiao et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 118, 236801 (2017).45 Copyright 2017 American Physical Society. (c) and (d) MoS2 exhibits rectified IV characteristic as one of the contact areas is depleted by the P(VDF-TrFE) top-gate. Poling different contact areas can reverse the polarity of the current rectification.46 Reproduced with permission from Li et al., Nano Lett. 18, 2021 (2018). Copyright 2018 American Chemical Society.

FIG. 2.

(a) Schematic of a MoS2 FET with a SiO2 back-gate and a P(VDF-TrFE) top-gate. (b) Monolayer MoS2 exhibits rectified IV as the top-gate is polarized into the half Pup-half Pdown domain. The solid line is a fit to the thermionic emission model. Reproduced with permission from Xiao et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 118, 236801 (2017).45 Copyright 2017 American Physical Society. (c) and (d) MoS2 exhibits rectified IV characteristic as one of the contact areas is depleted by the P(VDF-TrFE) top-gate. Poling different contact areas can reverse the polarity of the current rectification.46 Reproduced with permission from Li et al., Nano Lett. 18, 2021 (2018). Copyright 2018 American Chemical Society.

Close modal

For logic applications, ferroelectric-gated 2D structures have drawn increasing research interest for building steep slope FETs that can transcend the Boltzmann limit of 60 mV/dec subthreshold swing (SS) at room temperature.12 The original proposal of the device concept capitalizes on the negative curvature in the free energy of the ferroelectric upon polarization switching (Fig. 1), known as the negative capacitance (NC) effect.81 To stabilize the device operation in the NC region, a widely adopted approach is to exploit a ferroelectric/dielectric stack gate,12 while other mechanisms, such as polarization rotation,82 DW,38 strain,83 and interfacial charge trapping,84 have also been proposed. Despite the intense debate on the origin, sub-60 mV/dec SS has been achieved in 2D FETs using various ferroelectrics as the gate, including PZT,38 P(VDF-TrFE),51,55,56 (Hf,Zr)Ox (HZO),63–67 Al-doped HfO2,68 SrBi2Nb2O9,30 and CuInP2S6 (CIPS),72 while dielectrics such as HfO2, Al2O3, and h-BN have been adopted for providing the capacitance matching. The dielectric layer modifies the net free energy landscape and quenches the hysteresis window. Working with the HZO/Al2O3 stack gate, Si et al. have achieved hysteresis-free switching with a minimum SS of 5.6 mV/dec and a maximum drain current of 510 μA/μm. While most of these devices are n-type, p-type NC-FETs have been demonstrated in WSe2 channels.67,72 Steep slope switching has also been observed in FET devices with a single ferroelectric layer,38,55,56,72 which has been attributed to the intrinsic capacitance of the 2D-FET,72 the existence of an interfacial dielectric dead layer,55 and the metastable polar region within the ferroelectric DW.38 

As polarization switching in ferroelectrics displays memristive characteristics, i.e., history-dependent switching, applications of ferroelectric/2D heterostructures for neuromorphic computing have garnered attention. The partial switching of ferroelectric polarization can lead to multi-level conductance states in the 2D channel for effective signal mapping in artificial neural networks during the in-memory data processing. Optically controlled synaptic switching has been reported in PZT-gated WS2,39 which can be used to develop neuromorphic optical sensing and memory. Graphene transistors gated by P(VDF-TrFE) have been electrically reconfigured as complementary potentiative/depressive synapse, which can be used for both level-based and spike-based computing.58 This research effort demonstrates the application potential of the ferroelectric/2D heterostructures for image recognition, machine learning, and energy-efficient logic-in-memory computing.

In addition to memory and logic applications, ferroelectric polarization-induced doping has led to the development of a range of high-performance nanoelectronic and optoelectronic devices, such as broadband photodetectors, ferroelectric tunnel junctions (FTJs), and various sensing devices. It is proved to be effective in enhancing sensitivity and suppressing zero-bias dark current in vdW-based photodetectors for visible to infrared wavelengths.24,48–50 For example, Wang et al. showed that the remnant polarization of P(VDF-TrFE) can tune the bandgap of few-layer MoS2, broadening the sensing spectrum to the wavelength range of 0.85–1.55 μm,48 while a spectrum of 0.6–1.5 μm has been demonstrated for MoTe2.49 Graphene85 and MoS286 have been interfaced with ultrathin BaTiO3 to build the FTJs. A voltage-controlled tunnel resistance switching ratio of 104 has been reported in the MoS2-based FTJ,86 which is 50-fold higher than similar FTJs with metal electrodes. Inserting an ultrathin BiFeO3 tunnel barrier to the drain contact in a vertical FET structure has led to a current switching ratio of 7 × 107 in the transfer characteristic, with SS = 45 mV/dec achieved.87 

As the ferroelectrics also exhibit piezoelectric and pyroelectric effects, the doping-induced variation in the 2D electronic properties can be utilized to detect the polarization change induced by the electric field, stress, or temperature, making the hybrid structure well suited for developing various sensor applications. Besides charge sensors,22,26 graphene44 and MoS242 FeFETs have also been utilized to detect pressure-induced polarization changes in the ferroelectric gate for touch screen applications. It has been shown that standalone MoS2 FETs can detect the static and dynamic variation of piezopotential in a series connected P(VDF-TrFE) capacitor.88 The sensitive optothermal response of the ferroelectric/2D hybrid structures89 makes them viable for constructing infrared bolometers, with a ultrahigh temperature coefficient of resistance realized in graphene on LiNbO3.90 Taking advantages of the atomic layer thickness and high mechanical strength of the vdW materials, the ferroelectric/2D structures are promising building blocks for flexible electronics,23,52–54 facilitating their implementation in wearable applications. In addition, 2D materials have been used as high-quality transparent conductors for ferroelectric-based photovoltaic devices.91,92

The aforementioned electronic and optoelectronic devices center on the modulation of the electronic transport in the 2D layer. Noncentrosymmetric vdW materials, on the other hand, offer new research opportunities resulting from the direct polar coupling with the ferroelectrics. For example, monolayer MoS2 exhibits in-plane piezoelectricity93 and strong nonlinear optical responses94 due to the lack of the inversion center. When interfaced with PbTiO3, it is possible to induce a virtual out-of-plane piezoelectric response in odd-layer MoS2, which is substantially higher than the ferroelectric substrate.13 Polar coupling can be further combined with nanoscale domain patterning to design the nonlinear optical response. By transferring monolayer MoS2 on the pre-patterned domain structures in epitaxial (001) PZT thin films, Li et al. have shown that the second harmonic generation (SHG) signal at the heterointerface can be either significantly enhanced or almost entirely quenched at the DWs depending on the alignment between the polar axis of MoS2 and the chiral rotation of the surface dipole at the DWs (Fig. 3).14 These emerging functionalities pave the way for designing polarization-controlled actuators and smart optical filters that can be programmed and reconfigured at the nanoscale.

FIG. 3.

(a) Schematic view of interfacial coupling between MoS2 and ferroelectric DW in PZT. (b) Piezoresponse force microscopy (PFM) and (c) SHG images of square domains patterned in a (001) PZT film. A pronounced SHG signal is only observed at the DWs. (d) SHG image of the same domain structure after a monolayer MoS2 is transferred on top shows tailored signals at the horizontal DWs. Li et al., Nat. Commun. 11, 1422 (2020).14 Copyright 2020 Author(s), licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license.

FIG. 3.

(a) Schematic view of interfacial coupling between MoS2 and ferroelectric DW in PZT. (b) Piezoresponse force microscopy (PFM) and (c) SHG images of square domains patterned in a (001) PZT film. A pronounced SHG signal is only observed at the DWs. (d) SHG image of the same domain structure after a monolayer MoS2 is transferred on top shows tailored signals at the horizontal DWs. Li et al., Nat. Commun. 11, 1422 (2020).14 Copyright 2020 Author(s), licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license.

Close modal

For the ferroelectric/2D vdW heterostructures, the fundamental limit for vertical size scaling is imposed by the ferroelectric layer. In perovskite oxides, ferroelectricity is often suppressed or even disappears when the film is below a critical thickness due to the depolarization field, known as the finite size effect.6 For the ferroelectric polymer P(VDF-TrFE), while layer-by-layer deposition with precise thickness control can be achieved via the Langmuir–Blodgett technique,7 films thinner than 10 nm would congregate into isolated nanomesa structures.95 In contrast, 2D vdW ferroelectrics are not bound to such limitations. Layered vdW ferroelectrics have emerged in recent years as a new class of ferroelectric materials, which have many intriguing traits and high application potential in nanoelectronics and optoelectronics.96,97 Many vdW materials can retain ferroelectricity even down to 1 unit-cell thickness, benefiting from the absence of surface reconstructions, compensation of the in-plane depolarization between odd and even layers, and/or effective polarization screening provided by intrinsic charge carriers.15,98,99 As vdW ferroelectrics can be grown or transferred on any substrate, they can be seamlessly integrated with other layered materials into ferroelectric heterostructures and superlattices, offering high fabrication flexibility. Compared to their oxide counterparts, the vdW ferroelectrics also have many distinct properties, such as the tunable bandgap, negative piezoelectric constant, and high mechanical flexibility,100–103 which can enable tunable bandwidth photodetectors, electromechanical devices, and wearable applications.

The 2D ferroelectric family encompasses a broad spectrum of electronic behaviors, ranging from insulators, semiconductors, to semimetals.15–17Table I summarizes the key properties of five representative 2D ferroelectrics. Here, CIPS and WTe2 have out-of-plane polarization,16,104 SnTe and SnS possess in-plane polarization, while α-In2Se3 shows inter-correlated in-plane and out-of-plane polarization.105 For those with in-plane polarization, such as SnTe, SnS, and α-In2Se3, robust ferroelectricity is sustained down to the monolayer limit. The Curie temperature for most of these vdW ferroelectrics is above room temperature, which is highly desirable for practical applications.

TABLE I.

Properties of representative 2D vdW ferroelectrics.

MaterialCuInP2S698,106,107In2Se315,73,105,108SnS99,109SnTe98 WTe217 
Bandgap (bulk) 2.9 eV98  1.36 eV 1.0–1.2 eV 0.18 eV Semimetal 
Polarization Direction Out-of-plane In-plane and out-of-plane In-plane In-plane Out-of-plane 
TC (bulk) 315 K >473 K 800 K 98 K ≥300 K 
Ec 60 kV/cm 200 kV/cm 10.7 kV/cm N/A N/A 
Thickness scaling 4 nm Monolayer Monolayer Monolayer Bilayer 
MaterialCuInP2S698,106,107In2Se315,73,105,108SnS99,109SnTe98 WTe217 
Bandgap (bulk) 2.9 eV98  1.36 eV 1.0–1.2 eV 0.18 eV Semimetal 
Polarization Direction Out-of-plane In-plane and out-of-plane In-plane In-plane Out-of-plane 
TC (bulk) 315 K >473 K 800 K 98 K ≥300 K 
Ec 60 kV/cm 200 kV/cm 10.7 kV/cm N/A N/A 
Thickness scaling 4 nm Monolayer Monolayer Monolayer Bilayer 

Among these five vdW ferroelectrics, CIPS has the largest bandgap (2.9 eV), which is a critical factor for choosing a gate dielectric. CIPS has a layered sulfur framework, with the octahedral voids filled by Cu, In, and P–P pairs.98 Both Cu and In cations can displace vertically inside the S octahedral, leading to out-of-plane polarization.107 The polarization switching in CIPS is coupled to the ionic movement of the copper atoms, which leads to a long switching time constant (∼100 μs).59 The large displacive freedom of the Cu ions combined with the softness of the vdW interaction leads to the large deformation susceptibility of the lattice under the electric field, which results in a giant negative piezoelectric effect in CIPS.101,102 Density functional theory calculations reveal that CIPS has an unusual uniaxial quadruple potential well, which is enabled by the second stable Cu position in the vdW gap.102 The coexistence of four polarization states was further verified by PFM measurements.102 In2Se3 is a semiconductor with a moderate bandgap (1.36 eV). Each In2Se3 quintuple layer consists of five atomic layers in the sequence of Se–In–Se–In–Se.110 The central Se layer is tetrahedrally coordinated by the two neighboring In layers, which effectively breaks the centrosymmetry and induces both in-plane and out-of-plane spontaneous polarization.110 The shifting of the Se atoms in the central layer by a vertical or lateral electric field will cause the reversal of the out-of-plane and in-plane polarization simultaneously.15 2D ferroelectricity was recently discovered in semi-metallic WTe2.17 The metallic ferroelectrics are rare because the mobile charge carriers in metal can effectively screen the electrostatic force between ions and the external electric field. However, if the ferroelectric metal is thin enough, ferroelectric polarization can, in principle, be switched. Fei et al. have demonstrated ferroelectric switching in 1T′ WTe2 by applying an electric field between the top and bottom electrodes, which results in bi-stable conductance states in the channel associated with the out-of-plane polarization in the Pup and Pdown states.17 

Since the initial discovery, extensive research has been carried out on developing vdW ferroelectric-based electronic and photonic devices for their excellent properties and intrinsic scaling advantages. Notable examples include nonvolatile memories,50,69–71,73 switchable rectifiers,74,108 NC-FETs,72 electrocaloric devices,107 and piezoelectric devices.103 Wan et al. assembled α-In2Se3/graphene heterostructures and constructed ferroelectric diodes, in which the Schottky barrier between α-In2Se3 and graphene can be modulated by reversing the polarization of α-In2Se3, leading to a switchable rectification polarity.108 Unlike the traditional FeFET exploiting a ferroelectric gate insulator, Si et al. realized a large memory window and a high on/off ratio of over 108 at room temperature in HfO2-gated α-In2Se3 FETs, where the hysteresis behavior originates from polarization reversal in the α-In2Se3 channel.73 Wang et al. achieved a minimum subthreshold swing of 28 mV/dec in CIPS-gated MoS2 NC-FETs72 and showed that the leakage current and hysteresis can be effectively suppressed by inserting an h-BN layer between CIPS and MoS2. Gate tunable memristive switching has also been observed in α-In2Se3 with a SiO2 back-gate, making it a viable candidate for developing neuromorphic computing.71 While the study of 2D vdW ferroelectric materials is still in an early stage, these results already showcase their great application potential for low-power logic and memory applications.

In the above discussion, we have provided a brief review of the recent advancement in ferroelectric/vdW heterostructures and vdW ferroelectrics. The interplay between ferroelectricity and van der Waals bonding enables the innovation and development of a wide variety of nanoscale electronic, photonic, and sensing devices, including low-power memories, steep-slope logic transistors, high-performance photodetectors/photovoltaic devices, programmable junctions, and polarization-controlled actuators and optical filters. There are, however, materials challenges that need to be tackled before these device concepts can be commercialized.

For ferroelectric/2D heterostructures, a major challenge is to control the extrinsic charge dynamics at the heterointerface, which significantly compromise the field effect.5 Another key issue is the large-scale synthesis of vdW materials. Although wafer-scale synthesis of TMDCs, such as MoS2 and WS2, has been demonstrated,111 processes for fabricating high-quality vdW ferroelectrics on a large scale are yet to be developed. The field also offers exciting new research opportunities. For example, in addition to the polarization-induced electrostatic doping, the piezoelectric and pyroelectric effect in the ferroelectric materials can be further exploited in tuning the 2D materials for information processing and sensor applications. Novel mechanical and optical devices can be envisioned by leveraging the direct polar coupling between ferroelectric oxides and van der Waals materials.

Regarding the 2D vdW ferroelectrics, the relative low bandgap can lead to undesired operation power consumption when they are employed as the gate material. As the ferroelectric 2D with an out-of-plane polar axis is still subject to the finite size effect, soft 2D ferroelectrics with an in-plane polar axis, i.e., easily polarizable along the film normal direction, can be highly desirable for electronic and mechanical applications. One research direction of strong interest is, thus, to discover new vdW ferroelectric materials with a larger bandgap or desired dielectric and optical properties, e.g., through data mining. Although over one thousand 2D materials have been predicted theoretically, only a handful of them have been identified as ferroelectric materials. On the other hand, experimental confirmation of ferroelectricity in the material candidates is also important. Currently, many predicted ferroelectric materials, such as III–VI chalcogenides,110 group IV monochalcogenides,98,112,113 and group III–V binary monolayers,114 still remain to be verified experimentally.

For both material schemes, 3D monolithic integration of these ferroelectric electronic/optoelectronic devices with silicon-based CMOS technology will bring logic, memory, and sensors in close proximity,115–117 paving the way for developing the next generation computing and sensing systems with high density, high speed, low power consumption, and disruptive operation principles.

D.L. and X.H. would like to acknowledge the support of the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE), Office of Science, Basic Energy Sciences (BES), under Award No. DE-SC0016153. H.R., K.X, and W.Z would like to acknowledge the support of the National Science Foundation (NSF) under Grant No. ECCS 16-53241 CAR and of the Office of Naval Research (ONR) under Grant No. NAVY N00014-17-1-2973. H.R would like to acknowledge the support of the Kwanjeong Educational Foundation.

The data that support our findings are available from the corresponding authors upon reasonable request.

1.
M. M.
Waldrop
, “
The chips are down for Moore's law
,”
Nature
530
,
144
(
2016
).
2.
F.
Schwierz
, “
Graphene transistors
,”
Nat. Nanotechnol.
5
,
487
(
2010
).
3.
M.
Chhowalla
,
D.
Jena
, and
H.
Zhang
, “
Two-dimensional semiconductors for transistors
,”
Nat. Rev. Mater.
1
,
16052
(
2016
).
4.
A. K.
Geim
and
I. V.
Grigorieva
, “
Van der Waals heterostructures
,”
Nature
499
,
419
(
2013
).
5.
X.
Hong
, “
Emerging ferroelectric transistors with nanoscale channel materials: The possibilities, the limitations
,”
J. Phys.: Condens. Matter
28
,
103003
(
2016
).
6.
M.
Dawber
,
K. M.
Rabe
, and
J. F.
Scott
, “
Physics of thin-film ferroelectric oxides
,”
Rev. Mod. Phys.
77
,
1083
(
2005
).
7.
S.
Ducharme
,
S. P.
Palto
,
V. M.
Freidkin
, and
L. M.
Blinov
, in
Handbook of Thin Film Materials
, edited by
H. S.
Nalwa
(
Academic
,
San Diego
,
2002
), Vol.
3
.
8.
E.
Bousquet
,
M.
Dawber
,
N.
Stucki
,
C.
Lichtensteiger
,
P.
Hermet
,
S.
Gariglio
,
J. M.
Triscone
, and
P.
Ghosez
, “
Improper ferroelectricity in perovskite oxide artificial superlattices
,”
Nature
452
,
732
(
2008
).
9.
J.
Nordlander
,
M.
Campanini
,
M. D.
Rossell
,
R.
Erni
,
Q. N.
Meier
,
A.
Cano
,
N. A.
Spaldin
,
M.
Fiebig
, and
M.
Trassin
, “
The ultrathin limit of improper ferroelectricity
,”
Nat. Commun.
10
,
5591
(
2019
).
10.
N. A.
Benedek
and
C. J.
Fennie
, “
Hybrid improper ferroelectricity: A mechanism for controllable polarization-magnetization coupling
,”
Phys. Rev. Lett.
106
,
107204
(
2011
).
11.
J. S.
Meena
,
S. M.
Sze
,
U.
Chand
, and
T. Y.
Tseng
, “
Overview of emerging nonvolatile memory technologies
,”
Nanoscale Res. Lett.
9
,
526
(
2014
).
12.
M. A.
Alam
,
M. W.
Si
, and
P. D. D.
Ye
, “
A critical review of recent progress on negative capacitance field-effect transistors
,”
Appl. Phys. Lett.
114
,
090401
(
2019
).
13.
H.-J.
Jin
,
W. Y.
Yoon
, and
W.
Jo
, “
Virtual out-of-plane piezoelectric response in MoS2 layers controlled by ferroelectric polarization
,”
ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces
10
,
1334
(
2018
).
14.
D.
Li
,
X.
Huang
,
Z.
Xiao
,
H.
Chen
,
L.
Zhang
,
Y.
Hao
,
J.
Song
,
D.-F.
Shao
,
E. Y.
Tsymbal
,
Y.
Lu
 et al, “
Polar coupling enabled nonlinear optical filtering at MoS2/ferroelectric heterointerfaces
,”
Nat. Commun.
11
,
1422
(
2020
).
15.
C.
Cui
,
W.-J.
Hu
,
X.
Yan
,
C.
Addiego
,
W.
Gao
,
Y.
Wang
,
Z.
Wang
,
L.
Li
,
Y.
Cheng
,
P.
Li
 et al, “
Intercorrelated in-plane and out-of-plane ferroelectricity in ultrathin two-dimensional layered semiconductor In2Se3
,”
Nano Lett.
18
,
1253
(
2018
).
16.
F.
Liu
,
L.
You
,
K. L.
Seyler
,
X.
Li
,
P.
Yu
,
J.
Lin
,
X.
Wang
,
J.
Zhou
,
H.
Wang
,
H.
He
 et al, “
Room-temperature ferroelectricity in CuInP2S6 ultrathin flakes
,”
Nat. Commun.
7
,
12357
(
2016
).
17.
Z.
Fei
,
W.
Zhao
,
T. A.
Palomaki
,
B.
Sun
,
M. K.
Miller
,
Z.
Zhao
,
J.
Yan
,
X.
Xu
, and
D. H.
Cobden
, “
Ferroelectric switching of a two-dimensional metal
,”
Nature
560
,
336
(
2018
).
18.
X.
Hong
,
K.
Zou
,
A. M.
DaSilva
,
C. H.
Ahn
, and
J.
Zhu
, “
Integrating functional oxides with graphene
,”
Solid State Commun.
152
,
1365
(
2012
).
19.
X.
Hong
,
A.
Posadas
,
K.
Zou
,
C. H.
Ahn
, and
J.
Zhu
, “
High mobility few layer graphene field effect transistors fabricated on epitaxial ferroelectric gate oxides
,”
Phys. Rev. Lett.
102
,
136808
(
2009
).
20.
C. J.
Zhou
,
X. S.
Wang
,
S.
Raju
,
Z. Y.
Lin
,
D.
Villaroman
,
B. L.
Huang
,
H. L. W.
Chan
,
M. S.
Chan
, and
Y.
Chai
, “
Low voltage and high ON/OFF ratio field-effect transistors based on CVD MoS2 and ultra high-k gate dielectric PZT
,”
Nanoscale
7
,
8695
(
2015
).
21.
X.
Hong
,
J.
Hoffman
,
A.
Posadas
,
K.
Zou
,
C. H.
Ahn
, and
J.
Zhu
, “
Unusual resistance hysteresis in n-layer graphene field effect transistors fabricated on ferroelectric Pb(Zr0.2Ti0.8)O3
,”
Appl. Phys. Lett.
97
,
033114
(
2010
).
22.
A.
Rajapitamahuni
,
J.
Hoffman
,
C. H.
Ahn
, and
X.
Hong
, “
Examining graphene field effect sensors for ferroelectric thin film studies
,”
Nano Lett.
13
,
4374
(
2013
).
23.
W.
Lee
,
O.
Kahya
,
C. T.
Toh
,
B.
Ozyilmaz
, and
J. H.
Ahn
, “
Flexible graphene-PZT ferroelectric nonvolatile memory
,”
Nanotechnology
24
,
475202
(
2013
).
24.
W. C.
Tan
,
W. H.
Shih
, and
Y. F.
Chen
, “
A highly sensitive graphene-organic hybrid photodetector with a piezoelectric substrate
,”
Adv. Funct. Mater.
24
,
6818
(
2014
).
25.
M. H.
Yusuf
,
B.
Nielsen
,
M.
Dawber
, and
X.
Du
, “
Extrinsic and intrinsic charge trapping at the graphene/ferroelectric interface
,”
Nano Lett.
14
,
5437
(
2014
).
26.
C.
Ma
,
Y.
Gong
,
R.
Lu
,
E.
Brown
,
B.
Ma
,
J.
Li
, and
J.
Wu
, “
Detangling extrinsic and intrinsic hysteresis for detecting dynamic switch of electric dipoles using graphene field-effect transistors on ferroelectric gates
,”
Nanoscale
7
,
18489
(
2015
).
27.
A.
Lipatov
,
P.
Sharma
,
A.
Gruverman
, and
A.
Sinitskii
, “
Optoelectrical molybdenum disulfide (MoS2)-ferroelectric memories
,”
ACS Nano
9
,
8089
(
2015
).
28.
X. W.
Zhang
,
D.
Xie
,
J. L.
Xu
,
Y. L.
Sun
,
X.
Li
,
C.
Zhang
,
R. X.
Dai
,
Y. F.
Zhao
,
X. M.
Li
,
X.
Li
 et al, “
MoS2 field-effect transistors with lead zirconate-titanate ferroelectric gating
,”
IEEE Electron Device Lett.
36
,
784
(
2015
).
29.
C.
Ko
,
Y.
Lee
,
Y.
Chen
,
J.
Suh
,
D.
Fu
,
A.
Suslu
,
S.
Lee
,
J. D.
Clarkson
,
H. S.
Choe
,
S.
Tongay
 et al, “
Ferroelectrically gated atomically thin transition-metal dichalcogenides as nonvolatile memory
,”
Adv. Mater.
28
,
2923
(
2016
).
30.
F.
Liu
,
Y.
Zhou
,
Y.
Wang
,
X.
Liu
,
J.
Wang
, and
H.
Guo
, “
Negative capacitance transistors with monolayer black phosphorus
,”
npj Quantum Mater.
1
,
16004
(
2016
).
31.
Z. Y.
Lu
,
C.
Serrao
,
A. I.
Khan
,
L.
You
,
J. C.
Wong
,
Y.
Ye
,
H. Y.
Zhu
,
X.
Zhang
, and
S.
Salahuddinl
, “
Nonvolatile MoS2 field effect transistors directly gated by single crystalline epitaxial ferroelectric
,”
Appl. Phys. Lett.
111
,
023104
(
2017
).
32.
S. P.
Rogers
,
R.
Xu
,
S.
Pandya
,
L. W.
Martin
, and
M.
Shim
, “
Slow conductance relaxation in graphene–ferroelectric field-effect transistors
,”
J. Phys. Chem. C
121
,
7542
(
2017
).
33.
A.
Lipatov
,
A.
Fursina
,
T. H.
Vo
,
P.
Sharma
,
A.
Gruverman
, and
A.
Sinitskii
, “
Polarization-dependent electronic transport in graphene/Pb(Zr,Ti)O3 ferroelectric field-effect transistors
,”
Adv. Electron. Mater.
3
,
1700020
(
2017
).
34.
H. W.
Shin
and
J. Y.
Son
, “
Nonvolatile ferroelectric memory based on PbTiO3 gated single-layer MoS2 field-effect transistor
,”
Electron. Mater. Lett.
14
,
59
(
2018
).
35.
L.
Xie
,
X.
Chen
,
Z.
Dong
,
Q.
Yu
,
X.
Zhao
,
G.
Yuan
,
Z.
Zeng
,
Y.
Wang
, and
K.
Zhang
, “
Nonvolatile photoelectric memory induced by interfacial charge at a ferroelectric PZT-gated black phosphorus transistor
,”
Adv. Electron. Mater.
5
,
1900458
(
2019
).
36.
A.
Lipatov
,
T.
Li
,
N. S.
Vorobeva
,
A.
Sinitskii
, and
A.
Gruverman
, “
Nanodomain engineering for programmable ferroelectric devices
,”
Nano Lett.
19
,
3194
(
2019
).
37.
W.
Hou
,
A.
Azizimanesh
,
A.
Sewaket
,
T.
Pena
,
C.
Watson
,
M.
Liu
,
H.
Askari
, and
S. M.
Wu
, “
Strain-based room-temperature non-volatile MoTe2 ferroelectric phase change transistor
,”
Nat. Nanotechnol.
14
,
668
(
2019
).
38.
J.
Song
,
Y.
Qi
,
Z.
Xiao
,
S.-H.
Kim
,
A. I.
Kingon
,
A. M.
Rappe
, and
X.
Hong
, “
Domain wall enabled hysteresis-free steep slope switching in MoS2 transistors
,” arXiv:1909.00113 (
2019
).
39.
Z. D.
Luo
,
X.
Xia
,
M. M.
Yang
,
N. R.
Wilson
,
A.
Gruverman
, and
M.
Alexe
, “
Artificial optoelectronic synapses based on ferroelectric field-effect enabled 2D transition metal dichalcogenide memristive transistors
,”
ACS Nano
14
,
746
(
2020
).
40.
Y.
Zheng
,
G.-X.
Ni
,
C.-T.
Toh
,
M.-G.
Zeng
,
S.-T.
Chen
,
K.
Yao
, and
B.
Ozyilmaz
, “
Gate-controlled nonvolatile graphene-ferroelectric memory
,”
Appl. Phys. Lett.
94
,
163505
(
2009
).
41.
H. S.
Lee
,
S. W.
Min
,
M. K.
Park
,
Y. T.
Lee
,
P. J.
Jeon
,
J. H.
Kim
,
S.
Ryu
, and
S.
Im
, “
MoS2 nanosheets for top-gate nonvolatile memory transistor channel
,”
Small
8
,
3111
(
2012
).
42.
W.
Park
,
J. H.
Yang
,
C. G.
Kang
,
Y. G.
Lee
,
H. J.
Hwang
,
C.
Cho
,
S. K.
Lim
,
S. C.
Kang
,
W. K.
Hong
,
S. K.
Lee
 et al, “
Characteristics of a pressure sensitive touch sensor using a piezoelectric PVDF-TrFE/MoS2 stack
,”
Nanotechnology
24
,
475501
(
2013
).
43.
Y. T.
Lee
,
H.
Kwon
,
J. S.
Kim
,
H.-H.
Kim
,
Y. J.
Lee
,
J. A.
Lim
,
Y.-W.
Song
,
Y.
Yi
,
W.-K.
Choi
,
D. K.
Hwang
 et al, “
Nonvolatile ferroelectric memory circuit using black phosphorus nanosheet-based field-effect transistors with P(VDF-TrFE) polymer
,”
ACS Nano
9
,
10394
(
2015
).
44.
J. H.
Yang
,
H. J.
Hwang
,
S. C.
Kang
, and
B. H.
Lee
, “
Sensitivity improvement of graphene/Al2O3/PVDF–TrFE stacked touch device through Al seed assisted dielectric scaling
,”
Microelectron. Eng.
147
,
79
(
2015
).
45.
Z. Y.
Xiao
,
J. F.
Song
,
D. K.
Ferry
,
S.
Ducharme
, and
X.
Hong
, “
Ferroelectric-domain-patterning-controlled Schottky junction state in monolayer MoS2
,”
Phys. Rev. Lett.
118
,
236801
(
2017
).
46.
D. W.
Li
,
Z. Y.
Xiao
,
S.
Mu
,
F.
Wang
,
Y.
Liu
,
J. F.
Song
,
X.
Huang
,
L. J.
Jiang
,
J.
Xiao
,
L.
Liu
 et al, “
A facile space-confined solid-phase sulfurization strategy for growth of high-quality ultrathin molybdenum disulfide single crystals
,”
Nano Lett.
18
,
2021
(
2018
).
47.
L.
Lv
,
F.
Zhuge
,
F.
Xie
,
X.
Xiong
,
Q.
Zhang
,
N.
Zhang
,
Y.
Huang
, and
T.
Zhai
, “
Reconfigurable two-dimensional optoelectronic devices enabled by local ferroelectric polarization
,”
Nat. Commun.
10
,
3331
(
2019
).
48.
X.
Wang
,
P.
Wang
,
J.
Wang
,
W.
Hu
,
X.
Zhou
,
N.
Guo
,
H.
Huang
,
S.
Sun
,
H.
Shen
,
T.
Lin
 et al, “
Ultrasensitive and broadband MoS2 photodetector driven by ferroelectrics
,”
Adv. Mater.
27
,
6575
(
2015
).
49.
H.
Huang
,
X.
Wang
,
P.
Wang
,
G.
Wu
,
Y.
Chen
,
C.
Meng
,
L.
Liao
,
J.
Wang
,
W.
Hu
,
H.
Shen
 et al, “
Ferroelectric polymer tuned two dimensional layered MoTe2 photodetector
,”
RSC Adv.
6
,
87416
(
2016
).
50.
G.
Wu
,
X.
Wang
,
P.
Wang
,
H.
Huang
,
Y.
Chen
,
S.
Sun
,
H.
Shen
,
T.
Lin
,
J.
Wang
,
S.
Zhang
 et al, “
Visible to short wavelength infrared In2Se3-nanoflake photodetector gated by a ferroelectric polymer
,”
Nanotechnology
27
,
364002
(
2016
).
51.
F. A.
McGuire
,
Z. H.
Cheng
,
K.
Price
, and
A. D.
Franklin
, “
Sub-60 mV/decade switching in 2D negative capacitance field-effect transistors with integrated ferroelectric polymer
,”
Appl. Phys. Lett.
109
,
093101
(
2016
).
52.
G.-X.
Ni
,
Y.
Zheng
,
S.
Bae
,
C. Y.
Tan
,
O.
Kahya
,
J.
Wu
,
B. H.
Hong
,
K.
Yao
, and
B.
Özyilmaz
, “
Graphene–ferroelectric hybrid structure for flexible transparent electrodes
,”
ACS Nano
6
,
3935
(
2012
).
53.
S.-H.
Bae
,
O.
Kahya
,
B. K.
Sharma
,
J.
Kwon
,
H. J.
Cho
,
B.
Özyilmaz
, and
J.-H.
Ahn
, “
Graphene-P(VDF-TrFE) multilayer film for flexible applications
,”
ACS Nano
7
,
3130
(
2013
).
54.
X.
Wang
,
M.
Tang
,
Y.
Chen
,
G.
Wu
,
H.
Huang
,
X.
Zhao
,
B.
Tian
,
J.
Wang
,
S.
Sun
,
H.
Shen
 et al, “
Flexible graphene field effect transistor with ferroelectric polymer gate
,”
Opt. Quantum Electron.
48
,
345
(
2016
).
55.
X.
Wang
,
Y.
Chen
,
G.
Wu
,
D.
Li
,
L.
Tu
,
S.
Sun
,
H.
Shen
,
T.
Lin
,
Y.
Xiao
,
M.
Tang
 et al, “
Two-dimensional negative capacitance transistor with polyvinylidene fluoride-based ferroelectric polymer gating
,”
npj 2D Mater. Appl.
1
,
38
(
2017
).
56.
X. Q.
Liu
,
R. R.
Liang
,
G. Y.
Gao
,
C. F.
Pan
,
C. S.
Jiang
,
Q.
Xu
,
J.
Luo
,
X. M.
Zou
,
Z. Y.
Yang
,
L.
Liao
 et al, “
MoS2 negative-capacitance field-effect transistors with subthreshold swing below the physics limit
,”
Adv. Mater.
30
,
1800932
(
2018
).
57.
D.
Li
,
X.
Wang
,
Y.
Chen
,
S.
Zhu
,
F.
Gong
,
G.
Wu
,
C.
Meng
,
L.
Liu
,
L.
Wang
,
T.
Lin
 et al, “
The ambipolar evolution of a high-performance WSe2 transistor assisted by a ferroelectric polymer
,”
Nanotechnology
29
,
105202
(
2018
).
58.
Y.
Chen
,
Y.
Zhou
,
F.
Zhuge
,
B.
Tian
,
M.
Yan
,
Y.
Li
,
Y.
He
, and
X. S.
Miao
, “
Graphene–ferroelectric transistors as complementary synapses for supervised learning in spiking neural network
,”
npj 2D Mater. Appl.
3
,
31
(
2019
).
59.
G.
Wu
,
B.
Tian
,
L.
Liu
,
W.
Lv
,
S.
Wu
,
X.
Wang
,
Y.
Chen
,
J.
Li
,
Z.
Wang
,
S.
Wu
 et al, “
Programmable transition metal dichalcogenide homojunctions controlled by nonvolatile ferroelectric domains
,”
Nat. Electron.
3
,
43
(
2020
).
60.
G.
Wu
,
X.
Wang
,
Y.
Chen
,
S.
Wu
,
B.
Wu
,
Y.
Jiang
,
H.
Shen
,
T.
Lin
,
Q.
Liu
,
X.
Wang
 et al, “
MoTe2 p–n homojunctions defined by ferroelectric polarization
,”
Adv. Mater.
32
,
1907937
(
2020
).
61.
G.
Wu
,
X.
Wang
,
Y.
Chen
,
S.
Wu
,
H.
Shen
,
T.
Lin
,
J.
Ge
,
W.
Hu
,
S.-T.
Zhang
,
X. J.
Meng
 et al, “
Two-dimensional series connected photovoltaic cells defined by ferroelectric domains
,”
Appl. Phys. Lett.
116
,
073101
(
2020
).
62.
W. C.
Yap
,
H.
Jiang
,
J.
Liu
,
Q.
Xia
, and
W.
Zhu
, “
Ferroelectric transistors with monolayer molybdenum disulfide and ultra-thin aluminum-doped hafnium oxide
,”
Appl. Phys. Lett.
111
,
013103
(
2017
).
63.
Z.
Yu
,
H.
Wang
,
W.
Li
,
S.
Xu
,
X.
Song
,
S.
Wang
,
P.
Wang
,
P.
Zhou
,
Y.
Shi
,
Y.
Chai
 et al, in IEEE International Electron Devices Meeting (IEDM) (
2017
), p.
23.6.1
.
64.
M.
Si
,
C.
Jiang
,
C.
Su
,
Y.
Tang
,
L.
Yang
,
W.
Chung
,
M. A.
Alam
, and
P. D.
Ye
, in
IEEE International Electron Devices Meeting (IEDM)
(
2017
), p.
23.5.1
.
65.
F. A.
McGuire
,
Y. C.
Lin
,
K.
Price
,
G. B.
Rayner
,
S.
Khandelwal
,
S.
Salahuddin
, and
A. D.
Franklin
, “
Sustained Sub-60 mV/decade switching via the negative capacitance effect in MoS2 transistors
,”
Nano Lett.
17
,
4801
(
2017
).
66.
M. W.
Si
,
C. J.
Su
,
C. S.
Jiang
,
N. J.
Conrad
,
H.
Zhou
,
K. D.
Maize
,
G.
Qiu
,
C. T.
Wu
,
A.
Shakouri
,
M. A.
Alam
 et al, “
Steep-slope hysteresis-free negative capacitance MoS2 transistors
,”
Nat. Nanotechnol.
13
,
24
(
2018
).
67.
M.
Si
,
C.
Jiang
,
W.
Chung
,
Y.
Du
,
M. A.
Alam
, and
P. D.
Ye
, “
Steep-slope WSe2 negative capacitance field-effect transistor
,”
Nano Lett.
18
,
3682
(
2018
).
68.
A.
Nourbakhsh
,
A.
Zubair
,
S.
Joglekar
,
M.
Dresselhaus
, and
T.
Palacios
, “
Subthreshold swing improvement in MoS2 transistors by the negative-capacitance effect in a ferroelectric Al-doped-HfO2/HfO2 gate dielectric stack
,”
Nanoscale
9
,
6122
(
2017
).
69.
M.
Si
,
P.-Y.
Liao
,
G.
Qiu
,
Y.
Duan
, and
P. D.
Ye
, “
Ferroelectric field-effect transistors based on MoS2 and CuInP2S6 two-dimensional van der Waals heterostructure
,”
ACS Nano
12
,
6700
(
2018
).
70.
S.
Wan
,
Y.
Li
,
W.
Li
,
X.
Mao
,
C.
Wang
,
C.
Chen
,
J.
Dong
,
A.
Nie
,
J.
Xiang
,
Z.
Liu
 et al, “
Nonvolatile ferroelectric memory effect in ultrathin α-In2Se3
,”
Adv. Funct. Mater.
29
,
1808606
(
2019
).
71.
F.
Xue
,
X.
He
,
J. R. D.
Retamal
,
A.
Han
,
J.
Zhang
,
Z.
Liu
,
J.-K.
Huang
,
W.
Hu
,
V.
Tung
,
J.-H.
He
 et al, “
Gate-tunable and multidirection-switchable memristive phenomena in a Van Der Waals ferroelectric
,”
Adv. Mater.
31
,
1901300
(
2019
).
72.
X.
Wang
,
P.
Yu
,
Z.
Lei
,
C.
Zhu
,
X.
Cao
,
F.
Liu
,
L.
You
,
Q.
Zeng
,
Y.
Deng
,
C.
Zhu
 et al, “
Van der Waals negative capacitance transistors
,”
Nat. Commun.
10
,
3037
(
2019
).
73.
M. W.
Si
,
A. K.
Saha
,
S. J.
Gao
,
G.
Qiu
,
J. K.
Qin
,
Y. Q.
Duan
,
J.
Jian
,
C.
Niu
,
H. Y.
Wang
,
W. Z.
Wu
 et al, “
A ferroelectric semiconductor field-effect transistor
,”
Nat. Electron.
2
,
580
(
2019
).
74.
M.
Dai
,
K.
Li
,
F.
Wang
,
Y.
Hu
,
J.
Zhang
,
T.
Zhai
,
B.
Yang
,
Y.
Fu
,
W.
Cao
,
D.
Jia
 et al, “
Intrinsic dipole coupling in 2D van der Waals ferroelectrics for gate-controlled switchable rectifier
,”
Adv. Electron. Mater.
6
,
1900975
(
2020
).
75.
Z.
Lu
,
C.
Serrao
,
A. I.
Khan
,
J. D.
Clarkson
,
J. C.
Wong
,
R.
Ramesh
, and
S.
Salahuddin
, “
Electrically induced, non-volatile, metal insulator transition in a ferroelectric-controlled MoS2 transistor
,”
Appl. Phys. Lett.
112
,
043107
(
2018
).
76.
D. S.
Schulman
,
A. J.
Arnold
, and
S.
Das
, “
Contact engineering for 2D materials and devices
,”
Chem. Soc. Rev.
47
,
3037
(
2018
).
77.
C. H.
Li
,
K. M.
McCreary
, and
B. T.
Jonker
, “
Spatial control of photoluminescence at room temperature by ferroelectric domains in monolayer WS2/PZT hybrid structures
,”
ACS Omega
1
,
1075
(
2016
).
78.
B.
Wen
,
Y.
Zhu
,
D.
Yudistira
,
A.
Boes
,
L. L.
Zhang
,
T.
Yidirim
,
B. Q.
Liu
,
H.
Yan
,
X. Q.
Sun
,
Y.
Zhou
 et al, “
Ferroelectric-driven exciton and trion modulation in monolayer molybdenum and tungsten diselenides
,”
ACS Nano
13
,
5335
(
2019
).
79.
D. F.
Jin
,
A.
Kumar
,
K. H.
Fung
,
J.
Xu
, and
N. X.
Fang
, “
Terahertz plasmonics in ferroelectric-gated graphene
,”
Appl. Phys. Lett.
102
,
201118
(
2013
).
80.
H.
Lu
,
B.
Wang
,
T.
Li
,
A.
Lipatov
,
H.
Lee
,
A.
Rajapitamahuni
,
R.
Xu
,
X.
Hong
,
S.
Farokhipoor
,
L. W.
Martin
 et al, “
Nanodomain engineering in ferroelectric capacitors with graphene electrodes
,”
Nano Lett.
16
,
6460
(
2016
).
81.
S.
Salahuddin
and
S.
Datta
, “
Use of negative capacitance to provide voltage amplification for low power nanoscale devices
,”
Nano Lett.
8
,
405
(
2008
).
82.
Y. B.
Qi
and
A. M.
Rappe
, “
Designing ferroelectric field-effect transistors based on the polarization-rotation effect for low operating voltage and fast switching
,”
Phys. Rev. Appl.
4
,
044014
(
2015
).
83.
S.
Das
, “
Two dimensional electrostrictive field effect transistor (2D-EFET): A sub-60mV/decade steep slope device with high on current
,”
Sci. Rep.
6
,
34811
(
2016
).
84.
A.
Daus
,
C.
Vogt
,
N.
Munzenrieder
,
L.
Petti
,
S.
Knobelspies
,
G.
Cantarella
,
M.
Luisier
,
G. A.
Salvatore
, and
G.
Troster
, “
Charge trapping mechanism leading to sub-60-mV/decade-swing FETs
,”
IEEE Trans. Electron Devices
64
,
2789
(
2017
).
85.
H.
Lu
,
A.
Lipatov
,
S.
Ryu
,
D. J.
Kim
,
H.
Lee
,
M. Y.
Zhuravlev
,
C. B.
Eom
,
E. Y.
Tsymbal
,
A.
Sinitskii
, and
A.
Gruverman
, “
Ferroelectric tunnel junctions with graphene electrodes
,”
Nat. Commun.
5
,
5518
(
2014
).
86.
T.
Li
,
P.
Sharma
,
A.
Lipatov
,
H.
Lee
,
J.-W.
Lee
,
M. Y.
Zhuravlev
,
T. R.
Paudel
,
Y. A.
Genenko
,
C.-B.
Eom
,
E. Y.
Tsymbal
 et al, “
Polarization-mediated modulation of electronic and transport properties of hybrid MoS2–BaTiO3–SrRuO3 tunnel junctions
,”
Nano Lett.
17
,
922
(
2017
).
87.
S.
Yuan
,
Z.
Yang
,
C.
Xie
,
F.
Yan
,
J.
Dai
,
S. P.
Lau
,
H. L. W.
Chan
, and
J.
Hao
, “
Ferroelectric-driven performance enhancement of graphene field-effect transistors based on vertical tunneling heterostructures
,”
Adv. Mater.
28
,
10048
(
2016
).
88.
J.
Zhao
,
Z.
Wei
,
Q.
Zhang
,
H.
Yu
,
S. P.
Wang
,
X. X.
Yang
,
G. Y.
Gao
,
S. S.
Qin
,
G. Y.
Zhang
,
Q. J.
Sun
 et al, “
Static and dynamic piezopotential modulation in piezo-electret gated MoS2 field-effect transistor
,”
ACS Nano
13
,
582
(
2019
).
89.
C. Y.
Hsieh
,
Y. T.
Chen
,
W. J.
Tan
,
Y. F.
Chen
,
W. Y.
Shih
, and
W. H.
Shih
, “
Graphene-lead zirconate titanate optothermal field effect transistors
,”
Appl. Phys. Lett.
100
,
113507
(
2012
).
90.
U.
Sassi
,
R.
Parret
,
S.
Nanot
,
M.
Bruna
,
S.
Borini
,
D.
De Fazio
,
Z.
Zhao
,
E.
Lidorikis
,
F. H. L.
Koppens
,
A. C.
Ferrari
 et al, “
Graphene-based mid-infrared room-temperature pyroelectric bolometers with ultrahigh temperature coefficient of resistance
,”
Nat. Commun.
8
,
14311
(
2017
).
91.
Y.
Zang
,
D.
Xie
,
X.
Wu
,
Y.
Chen
,
Y.
Lin
,
M.
Li
,
H.
Tian
,
X.
Li
,
Z.
Li
,
H.
Zhu
 et al, “
Enhanced photovoltaic properties in graphene/polycrystalline BiFeO3/Pt heterojunction structure
,”
Appl. Phys. Lett.
99
,
132904
(
2011
).
92.
R. K.
Katiyar
,
P.
Misra
,
F.
Mendoza
,
G.
Morell
, and
R. S.
Katiyar
, “
Switchable photovoltaic effect in bilayer graphene/BiFeO3/Pt heterostructures
,”
Appl. Phys. Lett.
105
,
142902
(
2014
).
93.
W. Z.
Wu
,
L.
Wang
,
Y. L.
Li
,
F.
Zhang
,
L.
Lin
,
S. M.
Niu
,
D.
Chenet
,
X.
Zhang
,
Y. F.
Hao
,
T. F.
Heinz
 et al, “
Piezoelectricity of single-atomic-layer MoS2 for energy conversion and piezotronics
,”
Nature
514
,
470
(
2014
).
94.
Y. L.
Li
,
Y.
Rao
,
K. F.
Mak
,
Y. M.
You
,
S. Y.
Wang
,
C. R.
Dean
, and
T. F.
Heinz
, “
Probing symmetry properties of few-layer MoS2 and h-BN by optical second-harmonic generation
,”
Nano Lett.
13
,
3329
(
2013
).
95.
M.
Bai
and
S.
Ducharme
, “
Ferroelectric nanomesa formation from polymer Langmuir–Blodgett films
,”
Appl. Phys. Lett.
85
,
3528
(
2004
).
96.
C.
Cui
,
F.
Xue
,
W.-J.
Hu
, and
L.-J.
Li
, “
Two-dimensional materials with piezoelectric and ferroelectric functionalities
,”
npj 2D Mater. Appl.
2
,
18
(
2018
).
97.
Y.
Zhang
,
H.
Wang
,
F.
Li
,
X.
Sun
,
B.
Dong
,
X.
Li
,
Z. V.
Han
,
T.
Yang
, and
H.
Zhang
, “
The emerging ferroic orderings in two dimensions
,”
Sci. China Inf. Sci.
62
,
220402
(
2019
).
98.
K.
Chang
,
J.
Liu
,
H.
Lin
,
N.
Wang
,
K.
Zhao
,
A.
Zhang
,
F.
Jin
,
Y.
Zhong
,
X.
Hu
,
W.
Duan
 et al, “
Discovery of robust in-plane ferroelectricity in atomic-thick SnTe
,”
Science
353
,
274
(
2016
).
99.
Y.
Bao
,
P.
Song
,
Y.
Liu
,
Z.
Chen
,
M.
Zhu
,
I.
Abdelwahab
,
J.
Su
,
W.
Fu
,
X.
Chi
,
W.
Yu
 et al, “
Gate-tunable in-plane ferroelectricity in few-layer SnS
,”
Nano Lett.
19
,
5109
(
2019
).
100.
J.
Quereda
,
R.
Biele
,
G.
Rubio-Bollinger
,
N.
Agraït
,
R.
D'Agosta
, and
A.
Castellanos-Gomez
, “
Strong quantum confinement effect in the optical properties of ultrathin α-In2Se3
,”
Adv. Opt. Mater.
4
,
1939
(
2016
).
101.
L.
You
,
Y.
Zhang
,
S.
Zhou
,
A.
Chaturvedi
,
S. A.
Morris
,
F.
Liu
,
L.
Chang
,
D.
Ichinose
,
H.
Funakubo
,
W.
Hu
 et al, “
Origin of giant negative piezoelectricity in a layered van der Waals ferroelectric
,”
Sci. Adv.
5
,
eaav3780
(
2019
).
102.
J. A.
Brehm
,
S. M.
Neumayer
,
L.
Tao
,
A.
O'Hara
,
M.
Chyasnavichus
,
M. A.
Susner
,
M. A.
McGuire
,
S. V.
Kalinin
,
S.
Jesse
,
P.
Ganesh
 et al, “
Tunable quadruple-well ferroelectric van der Waals crystals
,”
Nat. Mater.
19
,
43
(
2020
).
103.
Y.
Zhou
,
D.
Wu
,
Y.
Zhu
,
Y.
Cho
,
Q.
He
,
X.
Yang
,
K.
Herrera
,
Z.
Chu
,
Y.
Han
,
M. C.
Downer
 et al, “
Out-of-plane piezoelectricity and ferroelectricity in layered alpha-In2Se3 nanoflakes
,”
Nano Lett.
17
,
5508
(
2017
).
104.
A.
Belianinov
,
Q.
He
,
A.
Dziaugys
,
P.
Maksymovych
,
E.
Eliseev
,
A.
Borisevich
,
A.
Morozovska
,
J.
Banys
,
Y.
Vysochanskii
, and
S. V.
Kalinin
, “
CuInP2S6 room temperature layered ferroelectric
,”
Nano Lett.
15
,
3808
(
2015
).
105.
R.
Bacewicz
,
J.
Filipowicz
, and
A.
Wolska
, “
Optical properties of indium-rich phases in the Cu-In-Se system
,”
Ternary Multinary Compd.
152
,
507
(
1998
).
106.
I. P.
Studenyak
,
V. V.
Mitrovcij
,
G. S.
Kovacs
,
M. I.
Gurzan
,
O. A.
Mykajlo
,
Y. M.
Vysochanskii
, and
V. B.
Cajipe
, “
Disordering effect on optical absorption processes in CuInP2S6 layered ferrielectrics
,”
Phys. Status Solidi B
236
,
678
(
2003
).
107.
M.
Si
,
A. K.
Saha
,
P. Y.
Liao
,
S.
Gao
,
S. M.
Neumayer
,
J.
Jian
,
J.
Qin
,
N.
Balke Wisinger
,
H.
Wang
,
P.
Maksymovych
 et al, “
Room-temperature electrocaloric effect in layered ferroelectric CuInP2S6 for solid-state refrigeration
,”
ACS Nano
13
,
8760
(
2019
).
108.
S. Y.
Wan
,
Y.
Li
,
W.
Li
,
X. Y.
Mao
,
W. G.
Zhu
, and
H. T.
Zeng
, “
Room-temperature ferroelectricity and a switchable diode effect in two-dimensional alpha-In2Se3 thin layers
,”
Nanoscale
10
,
14885
(
2018
).
109.
N.
Sato
,
M.
Ichimura
,
E.
Arai
, and
Y.
Yamazaki
, “
Characterization of electrical properties and photosensitivity of SnS thin films prepared by the electrochemical deposition method
,”
Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells
85
,
153
(
2005
).
110.
W. J.
Ding
,
J. B.
Zhu
,
Z.
Wang
,
Y. F.
Gao
,
D.
Xiao
,
Y.
Gu
,
Z. Y.
Zhang
, and
W. G.
Zhu
, “
Prediction of intrinsic two-dimensional ferroelectrics in In2Se3 and other III2-VI3 van der Waals materials
,”
Nat. Commun.
8
,
14956
(
2017
).
111.
K.
Kang
,
S.
Xie
,
L.
Huang
,
Y.
Han
,
P. Y.
Huang
,
K. F.
Mak
,
C. J.
Kim
,
D.
Muller
, and
J.
Park
, “
High-mobility three-atom-thick semiconducting films with wafer-scale homogeneity
,”
Nature
520
,
656
(
2015
).
112.
R. X.
Fei
,
W.
Kang
, and
L.
Yang
, “
Ferroelectricity and phase transitions in monolayer group-IV monochalcogenides
,”
Phys. Rev. Lett.
117
,
097601
(
2016
).
113.
H.
Wang
and
X. F.
Qian
, “
Two-dimensional multiferroics in monolayer group IV monochalcogenides
,”
2D Mater.
4
,
015042
(
2017
).
114.
D.
Di Sante
,
A.
Stroppa
,
P.
Barone
,
M. H.
Whangbo
, and
S.
Picozzi
, “
Emergence of ferroelectricity and spin-valley properties in two-dimensional honeycomb binary compounds
,”
Phys. Rev. B
91
,
161401
(
2015
).
115.
A.
Lin
,
X.
Hong
,
V.
Wood
,
A. A.
Verevkin
,
C. H.
Ahn
,
R. A.
McKee
,
F. J.
Walker
, and
E. D.
Specht
, “
Epitaxial growth of Pb(Zr0.2Ti0.8)O3 on Si and its nanoscale piezoelectric properties
,”
Appl. Phys. Lett.
78
,
2034
(
2001
).
116.
R. M.
Moghadam
,
Z.
Xiao
,
K.
Ahmadi-Majlan
,
E. D.
Grimley
,
M.
Bowden
,
P.-V.
Ong
,
S. A.
Chambers
,
J. M.
Lebeau
,
X.
Hong
,
P. V.
Sushko
 et al, “
An ultrathin single crystalline relaxor ferroelectric integrated on a high mobility semiconductor
,”
Nano Lett.
17
,
6248
(
2017
).
117.
Y.
Liu
,
Y.
Huang
, and
X.
Duan
, “
Van der Waals integration before and beyond two-dimensional materials
,”
Nature
567
,
323
(
2019
).