In the original article,1 a simple miscalculation led to an error in the estimated laser induced temperature change, , which should yield 442 K instead of stated in this paper. All values entered in this formula, i.e., the incident Fluence of mJ/cm2, the absorbed energy fraction in FePt of approximately 25%, the film thickness d = 9.7 nm, and the estimated heat capacity of C = , are stated correctly in the text. The correct estimation leaves the main findings of the manuscript unchanged but the estimated thermal expansion coefficient on picosecond timescales has to be corrected by the same factor 3 to yield .
References
1.
A.
von Reppert
, L.
Willig
, J.-E.
Pudell
, M.
Rössle
, W.
Leitenberger
, M.
Herzog
, F.
Ganss
, O.
Hellwig
, and M.
Bargheer
, Appl. Phys. Lett.
113
, 123101
(2018
).© 2020 Author(s).
2020
Author(s)