We present a complete fabrication study of an efficiently coupled microring optical circuit tailored for cavity quantum electrodynamics with trapped atoms. The microring structures are fabricated on a transparent membrane with high in-vacuum fiber edge-coupling efficiency in a broad frequency band. In addition, a bus waveguide pulley coupler realizes critical coupling to the microrings at both of the cesium D-line frequencies, while high coupling efficiency is achieved at the cesium “magic” wavelengths for creating a lattice of two-color evanescent field traps above a microring. The presented platform holds promise for realizing a robust atom-nanophotonics hybrid quantum device.

Cold atoms trapped and interfaced with light in photonic optical circuits form exciting hybrid quantum platforms for quantum optics and atomic physics. Strong optical confinement in nanophotonic waveguides or resonators greatly enhances atom-light coupling beyond those achieved in diffraction-limited optics, enabling opportunities in studying light-matter interactions1–8 and radiative processes.9–11 At the circuit level, nanophotonic engineering offers a variety of tools in modifying the photonic density of states,12,13 as well as controlling photon transport and device optical links,14–18 thus enriching the complexity of atom-photon interactions and quantum functionality. The indistinguishability and long coherence time of neutral atoms make an atom-nanophotonic hybrid platform inherently scalable and by itself a strongly coupled many-body system.13,19,20 Recent developments in suspended photonic crystal waveguides and microring resonators8,21–24 hold great promise in realizing highly coherent quantum circuits with cold atoms in cavity QED and waveguide QED settings.13 

Engineering an integrated photonic circuit that fulfills all technical requirements has so far remained a challenging task. Ideally, the circuit geometry should be compatible with atom cooling and trapping. Nanophotonic waveguides and resonators must be fabricated with high precision and offer sufficient tunability for alignment with narrow atomic spectral lines. To perform quantum operations with high fidelity, photons should be coupled into and out of a circuit with high efficiency. It is advantageous that a photonic nanostructure could also be utilized to create far off-resonant optical traps to localize cold atoms.25,26 Taking cesium atoms, for example, a two-color evanescent field trap formed using the magic wavelengths (λb 794 nm and λr 935 nm) can create a better trap for coherent quantum operations.27,28 As such, all coupling elements to the circuit should work in a broad frequency band.

In this Letter, we discuss the design and full fabrication procedures of an efficiently coupled microring optical circuit that meets the above key requirements for building a robust hybrid quantum device. An overview of our platform is shown in Fig. 1, where Si3N4 microring resonators are evanescently coupled to a bus waveguide in a pulley geometry for optical input and output [Figs. 1(b) and 1(c)]. The microrings are top vacuum-cladded and are fabricated on a transparent SiO2–Si3N4 double-layer membrane [Figs. 1(c) and 2], suspended over a large window (2 mm × 8 mm) on a silicon chip. This ensures full optical access for laser cooling and cold atom trapping.29 The microring geometry is designed to optimize the cooperativity parameter C=3λ34π2QVm for cavity QED with cesium atoms,23 where λ=λD1=894 nm (λD2=852 nm) is the wavelength of the Cs D1 (D2) line. The microring radius is R15μm and the waveguide width and height are (W,H)=(750,380) nm, respectively (Fig. 2). A nearly optimal Q/Vm ratio is achieved, giving C1030 with an intrinsic quality factor Q13.3×105, currently limited by the surface scattering loss,23 and a mode volume Vm500μm3, evaluated using the normalized transverse-magnetic (TM) mode field amplitude at an atomic position zt100 nm centered above the microring dielectric surface. We adopt the fundamental TM-mode for its uniform polarization above a microring.23 

FIG. 1.

(a) Schematics showing the microring resonators (b) on a transparent membrane, the coupling bus waveguide (c), and the top-cladded lens fiber edge-couplers (d) for optical input and output (arrows). The inset shows a fabricated circuit. (b) Scanning electron micrograph of a microring resonator and a bus waveguide in a pulley geometry. Short linear segments in the microring are added to fine-tune the resonator length. (c) Optical micrograph and a zoom-in view (inset) of the microring array. (d) Schematics and micrograph (inset) of the edge-coupler, displaying the lensed fiber (i), the U-shaped fiber groove (ii), and the HSQ top-cladding layer (iii) covering the tapered bus waveguide (iv). (e) Normalized bus waveguide transmission T=Pout/Pin vs laser frequency f, showing multiple resonances each from a different microring; f0=335.116 THz is near the Cs D1-line frequency.

FIG. 1.

(a) Schematics showing the microring resonators (b) on a transparent membrane, the coupling bus waveguide (c), and the top-cladded lens fiber edge-couplers (d) for optical input and output (arrows). The inset shows a fabricated circuit. (b) Scanning electron micrograph of a microring resonator and a bus waveguide in a pulley geometry. Short linear segments in the microring are added to fine-tune the resonator length. (c) Optical micrograph and a zoom-in view (inset) of the microring array. (d) Schematics and micrograph (inset) of the edge-coupler, displaying the lensed fiber (i), the U-shaped fiber groove (ii), and the HSQ top-cladding layer (iii) covering the tapered bus waveguide (iv). (e) Normalized bus waveguide transmission T=Pout/Pin vs laser frequency f, showing multiple resonances each from a different microring; f0=335.116 THz is near the Cs D1-line frequency.

Close modal
FIG. 2.

(a) Optical micrographs of released membranes with tensile (left, 180 MPa) and compressive (right, −100 MPa) resulting stress. (b) Intrinsic stress of LPCVD Si3N4 and SiO2 layers measured after post-annealing at various temperatures. (c) Illustration of a lattice of microtraps formed in a top-illuminating optical beam. Position zt of the first trap center (green sphere) can be tuned by the layer thickness (HSiO,HSiN), as shown in (d). Solid lines indicate constant resulting stress (labeled in MPa), while shaded area marks the unstable region.

FIG. 2.

(a) Optical micrographs of released membranes with tensile (left, 180 MPa) and compressive (right, −100 MPa) resulting stress. (b) Intrinsic stress of LPCVD Si3N4 and SiO2 layers measured after post-annealing at various temperatures. (c) Illustration of a lattice of microtraps formed in a top-illuminating optical beam. Position zt of the first trap center (green sphere) can be tuned by the layer thickness (HSiO,HSiN), as shown in (d). Solid lines indicate constant resulting stress (labeled in MPa), while shaded area marks the unstable region.

Close modal

By lithographically scanning the length of each microring [Fig. 1(b)], their resonances approach the targeted frequency as shown in the transmission spectrum in Fig. 1(e). Precise alignment to the atomic spectral lines can be thermally tuned, for example, by a laser beam globally heating the silicon substrate under vacuum. The tunability is 0.5 GHz/mW. The transmission spectrum is measured through lensed fibers coupled to either end of the bus waveguide via an edge-coupler [Fig. 1(d)]. Each of the resonances in Fig. 1(e) displays nearly zero transmission T0, achieving the ideal critical coupling condition for probing atom-microring coupling, see Fig. 4.

We begin the circuit fabrication by preparing a SiO2–Si3N4 double-layer membrane stack, deposited on a silicon wafer using low-pressure chemical vapor deposition (LPCVD) processes. For stable membrane release from the silicon substrate, the compressive stress of the SiO2 layer (2μm thick) should be overcome by the tensile stress of the Si3N4 bottom-layer, giving a thickness-weighted tensile resulting stress.30 We arrive at a proper stress condition by post-annealing at around 1100°C for the Si3N4 bottom-layer and at 950°C after we deposited the SiO2 layer, two hours for each time [Fig. 2(b)]. In our results, a post-annealed membrane can be released free from buckling and severe cracking under a tensile stress of 70180 MPa.

Optical reflectance is another crucial factor in determining the membrane thickness, primarily concerning atom trapping. For example, in a top-illuminating optical tweezer trap implemented in Refs. 29 or 31, membrane reflection and interference result in a lattice of microtraps formed within a tweezer beam as shown in Fig. 2(c). We scan the SiO2/Si3N4 layer thickness to minimize the position zt of the first microtrap (formed by an anti-node) in a tweezer potential, while monitoring the resulting stress. An example is shown in Fig. 2(d), calculated for a λr= 935 nm tweezer trap focused by an objective of numerical aperture N.A. =0.35. A microtrap at zt150 nm forms with a layer thickness (HSiO,HSiN)(1.72,0.55)μm within the stable membrane regime.

Once the membrane stack is fabricated, an additional LPCVD-grown Si3N4 top-layer is deposited, and the wafer is diced into centimeter-sized chips [inset of Fig. 1(a)]. Microring arrays and bus waveguides are then fabricated in the top layer using e-beam lithography with multipass writing and an inductively coupled plasma reactive-ion etching (ICP-RIE) process with CHF3/O2 gas chemistry.32 

Either end of a bus waveguide is designed to taper down and terminate at a width of 70 nm for edge-coupling with a lensed fiber33 (1 μm focused beam waist), which is placed inside a U-shaped fiber groove of 65μm depth [Fig. 1(d)]. To achieve high coupling efficiency, a top-cladding structure on each edge-coupler is designed to improve symmetric mode matching with the lensed fiber. The geometry of the top-cladded edge-coupler has been numerically optimized using finite-different-time-domain calculations to achieve ∼70% coupling efficiency at Cs D-lines. The same coupler yields an efficiency of ∼70% (60%) at λr 935 nm (λb 794 nm).

To fabricate the top-cladding structure on each edge-coupler defined in the first lithography step, we cover the tapered bus waveguides with ∼1 μm-thick hydrogen silsesquioxane (HSQ) resist as the top-cladding material. Using second e-beam lithography, we define the top-cladding structures to inversely taper down along the bus waveguides [Fig. 1(d)] so as to keep the microrings top vacuum-cladded. Fiber grooves and edge-coupler facets are defined in a subsequent photolithography step. HSQ and SiO2 are then etched away in the ICP-RIE, followed by the Bosch process etching to create fiber U-grooves in the silicon.

Following the fabrication of photonic structures at the front side of the chip, the membrane is then released from the silicon substrate. To do this, a window at the backside of the chip is first defined using photolithography, while the front-side is protected with a thick layer of spin-coated photoresist (PMMA 950 coating with a Surpass 3000 adhesion promoter). Materials at the backside are etched away in the ICP-RIE, and the Bosch process until leftover silicon is only 15μm thick. To gently release the membrane, we perform wet-etching in a 12% aqueous TMAH solution at 65 ºC, followed by DI water rinsing and cleaning with PRS-2000 stripper and Nanostrip to expose the front-side photonic structures. Finally, a thin alumina layer (5 nm) is deposited using atomic layer deposition to protect the microrings against cesium corrosion during experiments.34 

Our fabrication procedure yields a nearly 100% success rate on membrane release. The released membrane is optically flat and has a root-mean-squared surface roughness of 1.4 nm. Additional chemical mechanical polishing step32 can be applied to the SiO2–Si3N4 double-layer stack following LPCVD. We have measured surface roughness down below 0.5 nm, which is expected to improve the microring quality factor to Q>106 using similar fabrication procedures.23 

In the final step, optical lensed fibers are introduced to the fiber grooves. The alignment tolerance is ±0.3μm for 1 dB excess loss. Fine adjustment in the U-groove is required prior to epoxy fixture. We note that misalignment can occur under vacuum when bulk epoxy outgases and shrinks. Therefore, only a thin layer of low viscosity UV epoxy (OG198–54) is applied for alignment fixture. We achieve ∼50% (∼3 dB loss) coupling efficiency per facet, which persists under vacuum pressure below 106 Torr. The fibers are guided out of a vacuum chamber without noticeable loss via a Teflon feedthrough mounted on a Swagelok fitting.35 

We now discuss the design of pulley couplers [Fig. 3(a)], which allows us to separately optimize the bus waveguide parameters and the coupling length CL for efficient microring coupling over a wide frequency band. We perform a finite element method (FEM) analysis to calculate the microring coupling rate36κc=|S×sinc[(nwRwnR)CLRλ]CLR|2, where sinc(x)=sin(πx)/πx is the normalized sinc function, λ is the coupling wavelength (ω is the angular frequency), S=iωε04(ϵw(r,z)1)Ẽw·Ẽ*rdrdz, and the integration runs over the cross section of the bus waveguide with εw(r,z) being its dielectric function; (Ẽ(w),n(w),R(w)) correspond to the normalized resonator (bus waveguide) mode field, the effective refractive index, and the bend radius, respectively. By comparing κc with the microring intrinsic decay rate κi, also evaluated using a FEM analysis,23 we can optimize the bus waveguide-microring coupling efficiency numerically.

FIG. 3.

(a) Schematics of the pulley coupler. The coupler gap Wgap, bus waveguide width Ww, and bend radius Rw are optimized and fixed at (0.21,0.55,15.86)μm, respectively, along with the microring waveguide parameters (W,H,R)=(0.75,0.38,15)μm. CL is a variable coupling length. Color arrows depict the injected light for the two-color evanescent field trap (λb: blue, λr: red) and the atom probe (λD1,D2: black). (b) Simulated resonant transmission Tres vs coupling length CL at the indicated wavelengths. The vertical dashed line marks CL=2.9μm for the fabricated device. (c) Measured transmission spectra (color symbols) with laser wavelengths as in (b). The spectra are shifted to display resonances at laser detuning Δf=0, showing good agreement with calculation T(0)Tres [filled circles in (b)]. Solid curves are fits to extract κc and κi. Based on these measurements, a two-color evanescent field trap can be accurately evaluated. (d) Potential cross sections above a linear segment of the microring [dashed box in (a)], calculated using injected power (Pr,Pb)=(0.17,1.4) mW, respectively. Potential linecuts along the dashed lines are shown in (e). Green spheres mark the trap centers. Red spheres mark the saddle points where the trap opens. The potential difference between the weakest saddle point and the trap center defines the trap depth.23 (f) Variable vertical trap position zt (black curve) as indicated in (e) and trap depth ΔU (red curve), adjusted through the power ratio Pr/Pb. The dashed line marks the condition at which zt=100 nm.

FIG. 3.

(a) Schematics of the pulley coupler. The coupler gap Wgap, bus waveguide width Ww, and bend radius Rw are optimized and fixed at (0.21,0.55,15.86)μm, respectively, along with the microring waveguide parameters (W,H,R)=(0.75,0.38,15)μm. CL is a variable coupling length. Color arrows depict the injected light for the two-color evanescent field trap (λb: blue, λr: red) and the atom probe (λD1,D2: black). (b) Simulated resonant transmission Tres vs coupling length CL at the indicated wavelengths. The vertical dashed line marks CL=2.9μm for the fabricated device. (c) Measured transmission spectra (color symbols) with laser wavelengths as in (b). The spectra are shifted to display resonances at laser detuning Δf=0, showing good agreement with calculation T(0)Tres [filled circles in (b)]. Solid curves are fits to extract κc and κi. Based on these measurements, a two-color evanescent field trap can be accurately evaluated. (d) Potential cross sections above a linear segment of the microring [dashed box in (a)], calculated using injected power (Pr,Pb)=(0.17,1.4) mW, respectively. Potential linecuts along the dashed lines are shown in (e). Green spheres mark the trap centers. Red spheres mark the saddle points where the trap opens. The potential difference between the weakest saddle point and the trap center defines the trap depth.23 (f) Variable vertical trap position zt (black curve) as indicated in (e) and trap depth ΔU (red curve), adjusted through the power ratio Pr/Pb. The dashed line marks the condition at which zt=100 nm.

Close modal

Figure 3(b) shows the expected resonant transmission Tres=|κiκcκi+κc|2 as a function of the coupling length CL. The better the coupling efficiency, the lower the transmission. Approaching the critical coupling condition (κc=κi), all of the resonant input photons can be drawn into the microring, hence, resulting in zero transmission Tres=0. In this calculation, the pulley coupler geometry is chosen to improve the overlap of the critical coupling regions (Tres0) of all four relevant wavelengths. For the fabricated devices, we have selected CL=2.9μm to approach critical coupling for Cs D-lines at λD1 and λD2, respectively, while maintaining sufficient coupling efficiency near λb and λr magic wavelengths for two-color evanescent field traps.23 We anticipate Tres=(0.02,0.03,0.14,0.29) for test wavelengths λ=(894,852,932,795) nm, respectively, which are in very good agreement with the measurement T(0)(0.03,0.04,0.10,0.31) as shown in Fig. 3(c).

The agreement between the bus waveguide transmission measurement and full simulation results illustrates the fabrication precision of our microring optical circuit. Meanwhile, the absence of resonance splitting in the transmission data [Fig. 3(c)] suggests that there is negligible mode-mixing caused by coherent back-scattering in the microring resonator.23,37 Therefore, the resonant TM modes preserve the traveling-wave characteristics of a whispering-gallery mode (WGM).23 

Combining our measurement and FEM simulation results, we can now estimate the actual power required to create a stable two-color evanescent field trap. One sample scheme is illustrated in Fig. 3(a). A resonant TM mode near the wavelength λb is excited from the bus waveguide to create a smooth and short-range repulsive optical potential, preventing atoms from crashing onto the microring surface. Additional two phase-coherent, counterpropagating TM modes near the wavelength λr are excited from either end of the bus waveguide to create an attractive optical lattice-like potential, localizing atoms tightly above the microring. We note that, given the finite free spectral range of the microring, to achieve a satisfactory alignment of the microring resonances near the Cs magic wavelengths while maintaining the exact alignment of a resonator mode to the Cs D-line (through thermal tuning) requires further lithographic-tuning of the microring geometrical parameters near the reported values. Figures 3(d) and 3(e) plot the total ground state trap potential Utot, including the direct summation of repulsive and attractive potentials calculated using the electric field profiles obtained from the FEM analyses and the build-up intensity in the microring with a total input power of Pb+2Pr1.8 mW. We have also added in Utot an approximate Casimir-Polder attractive potential Ucp=C4/z(z3+λ), where C4=h×267 Hz ·μm4 is the Cs-Si3N4 surface interaction coefficient and λ=136 nm is an effective wavelength.38 

The two-color evanescent field trap is robust and tunable. The vertical trap location zt and the trap depth ΔU can be finely controlled by the power of injected light Pr(b) [Fig. 3(f)]. At an optimal power ratio shown in Fig. 3(e), the trap can be tuned to zt100 nm with ΔUkB×120μK, much deeper than the thermal energy kB×10μK of polarization-gradient cooled cesium atoms, where kB is the Boltzmann constant.

By realizing atom trapping and a critically coupled microring resonator aligned to an atomic resonance, it is possible to probe the interaction between single atoms and resonator photons with high sensitivity. As a simple example, in Fig. 4 we plot a weakly driven, steady-state bus waveguide transmission,11,39T(δ)=|g2+(iδ+Γ2)(iδ+κiκc2)g2+(iδ+Γ2)(iδ+κ2)|2, where δ is the laser detuning from the atomic resonance (D2 line), g=3λD23ωΓ16π2Vm is the position-dependent atom-photon coupling strength [inset of Fig. 4(b)], Γ=2π×5.2 MHz is the atomic decay rate, and the resonator decay rate κ=κi+κc=2π×5.6 GHz is extracted from the measurement. A trapped atom is assumed to be initially polarized in the ground state 6S1/2|F=4,mF=4 and is excited to 6P3/2|F=5,mF=5 by a circularly polarized counterclockwise (CCW) circulating WGM as shown in the inset of Fig. 4(a). A significant increase in the bus waveguide transmission T(0)1κΓ/2g2 can be observed near the atomic resonance when g2>κΓ. This transparency window results from the destructive interference between atom-WGM photon dressed states, similar to the electromagnetically induced transparency effect.40–42 At the desired trap location zt100 nm, we expect g2π×176 MHz and T(0)0.68 (T(0)0.86 for currently best available κ/2π2.0 GHz), which greatly contrasts T(0)0 of an empty microring [Fig. 4(b)]. The large variation of bus waveguide transmission could thus inform us the presence of a single atom and the strength of atom-photon coupling with high sensitivity.39,43 Finally, we note that the WGM circular polarization results from strong confinement in the microring nanowaveguide; the polarization is locked to the direction of the WGM circulation.44 Creating a directional coupling with spin-polarized atoms can give rise to applications, for example, in chiral quantum optics.4,6,45

FIG. 4.

(a) Transmission T with a spin-polarized atom trapped at the indicated positions zt, calculated using κc=κi=2π×2.8 GHz extracted from Fig. 3(c) and the atom-photon coupling strength g for σ+-transition driven by the CCW WGM as shown in the inset of (b). The polarization axis (red arrow) of the trapped atom (green sphere) and the CCW WGM (curved arrow) is depicted in the inset. (b) Resonant transmission T(0) vs zt (solid curve) and the case for κc=κi=2π×1.0 GHz (dashed curve, for Q3.3×105). Color symbols mark the trap locations as in (a).

FIG. 4.

(a) Transmission T with a spin-polarized atom trapped at the indicated positions zt, calculated using κc=κi=2π×2.8 GHz extracted from Fig. 3(c) and the atom-photon coupling strength g for σ+-transition driven by the CCW WGM as shown in the inset of (b). The polarization axis (red arrow) of the trapped atom (green sphere) and the CCW WGM (curved arrow) is depicted in the inset. (b) Resonant transmission T(0) vs zt (solid curve) and the case for κc=κi=2π×1.0 GHz (dashed curve, for Q3.3×105). Color symbols mark the trap locations as in (a).

Close modal

We demonstrate a microring optical circuit that permits a precise understanding of fabrication performance and analyses of the optical modes. Our circuit is efficiently coupled and scalable and can simultaneously accommodate a large number of atoms trapped in an array of surface microtraps. With near-term improvement on the membrane surface quality23 and reduction of other surface scattering sources,32,46 one expects a more than tenfold increase in the quality factor Q>4×106 to achieve large cooperativity C >250 when the microring is critically coupled. Coherent quantum operations with a single atom or in a hybrid lattice formed by atoms and photons can be realized following the introduction of cold atoms to the microring to form a hybrid quantum circuit with strong atom-photon interactions. In the latter case, the hybrid lattice can form a strongly coupled many-body system with a WGM photon-mediated interaction among all trapped atoms.19 Non-uniform or pair-wise tunable interactions can be achieved in this resonator by using local addressing, via top-projected optical tweezers, or a multi-frequency pumping scheme as detailed in Ref. 20. Dynamics of the strongly coupled hybrid lattice may be probed via the efficiently coupled bus waveguide or by using single atom-resolved fluorescence imaging.29,47

Funding is provided by the AFOSR YIP (Grant No. FA9550-17-1-0298) and the ONR (Grant No. N00014-17-1-2289). X. Zhou and M. Zhu acknowledge support from the Rolf Scharenberg Graduate Fellowship.

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

1.
J. D.
Thompson
,
T. G.
Tiecke
,
N. P.
de Leon
,
J.
Feist
,
A. V.
Akimov
,
M.
Gullans
,
A. S.
Zibrov
,
V.
Vuletić
, and
M. D.
Lukin
, “
Coupling a single trapped atom to a nanoscale optical cavity
,”
Science
340
,
1202
1205
(
2013
).
2.
T. G.
Tiecke
,
J. D.
Thompson
,
N. P.
de Leon
,
L. R.
Liu
,
V.
Vuletić
, and
M. D.
Lukin
, “
Nanophotonic quantum phase switch with a single atom
,”
Nature
508
,
241
244
(
2014
).
3.
A.
Goban
,
C.-L.
Hung
,
S.-P.
Yu
,
J. D.
Hood
,
J. A.
Muniz
,
J. H.
Lee
,
M. J.
Martin
,
A. C.
McClung
,
K. S.
Choi
,
D. E.
Chang
,
O.
Painter
, and
H. J.
Kimble
, “
Atom–light interactions in photonic crystals
,”
Nat. Commun.
5
,
3808
(
2014
).
4.
R.
Mitsch
,
C.
Sayrin
,
B.
Albrecht
,
P.
Schneeweiss
, and
A.
Rauschenbeutel
, “
Quantum state-controlled directional spontaneous emission of photons into a nanophotonic waveguide
,”
Nat. Commun.
5
,
5713
(
2014
).
5.
A.
Goban
,
C.-L.
Hung
,
J. D.
Hood
,
S.-P.
Yu
,
J. A.
Muniz
,
O.
Painter
, and
H. J.
Kimble
, “
Superradiance for atoms trapped along a photonic crystal waveguide
,”
Phys. Rev. Lett.
115
,
063601
(
2015
).
6.
M.
Scheucher
,
A.
Hilico
,
E.
Will
,
J.
Volz
, and
A.
Rauschenbeutel
, “
Quantum optical circulator controlled by a single chirally coupled atom
,”
Science
354
,
1577
1580
(
2016
).
7.
N. V.
Corzo
,
J.
Raskop
,
A.
Chandra
,
A. S.
Sheremet
,
B.
Gouraud
, and
J.
Laurat
, “
Waveguide-coupled single collective excitation of atomic arrays
,”
Nature
566
,
359
362
(
2019
).
8.
P.
Samutpraphoot
,
T.
Dordević
,
P. L.
Ocola
,
H.
Bernien
,
C.
Senko
,
V.
Vuletić
, and
M. D.
Lukin
, “
Strong coupling of two individually controlled atoms via a nanophotonic cavity
,”
Phys. Rev. Lett.
124
,
063602
(
2020
).
9.
J.
Perez-Rios
,
M. E.
Kim
, and
C.-L.
Hung
, “
Ultracold molecule assembly with photonic crystals
,”
New J. Phys.
19
,
123035
(
2017
).
10.
S.
Grandi
,
M. P.
Nielsen
,
J.
Cambiasso
,
S.
Boissier
,
K. D.
Major
,
C.
Reardon
,
T. F.
Krauss
,
R. F.
Oulton
,
E.
Hinds
, and
A. S.
Clark
, “
Hybrid plasmonic waveguide coupling of photons from a single molecule
,”
APL Photonics
4
,
086101
(
2019
).
11.
M.
Zhu
,
Y.-C.
Wei
, and
C.-L.
Hung
, “
Resonator-assisted single-molecule quantum state detection
,”
Phys. Rev. A
102
,
023716
(
2020
).
12.
J. D.
Joannopoulos
,
S. G.
Johnson
,
J. N.
Winn
, and
R. D.
Meade
,
Photonic Crystals: Molding the Flow of Light
, 2nd ed. (
Princeton University Press
,
2008
).
13.
D. E.
Chang
,
J. S.
Douglas
,
A.
González-Tudela
,
C.-L.
Hung
, and
H. J.
Kimble
, “
Colloquium: Quantum matter built from nanoscopic lattices of atoms and photons
,”
Rev. Mod. Phys.
90
,
031002
(
2018
).
14.
M.
Hafezi
,
S.
Mittal
,
J.
Fan
,
A.
Migdall
, and
J.
Taylor
, “
Imaging topological edge states in silicon photonics
,”
Nat. Photonics
7
,
1001
1005
(
2013
).
15.
T.
Ozawa
,
H. M.
Price
,
A.
Amo
,
N.
Goldman
,
M.
Hafezi
,
L.
Lu
,
M. C.
Rechtsman
,
D.
Schuster
,
J.
Simon
,
O.
Zilberberg
 et al, “
Topological photonics
,”
Rev. Mod. Phys.
91
,
015006
(
2019
).
16.
A. W.
Elshaari
,
W.
Pernice
,
K.
Srinivasan
,
O.
Benson
, and
V.
Zwiller
, “
Hybrid integrated quantum photonic circuits
,”
Nat. Photonics
14
,
336
314
(
2020
).
17.
L.
Stern
,
B.
Desiatov
,
I.
Goykhman
, and
U.
Levy
, “
Nanoscale light–matter interactions in atomic cladding waveguides
,”
Nat. Commun.
4
,
1548
(
2013
).
18.
P.
Solano
,
P.
Barberis-Blostein
,
F. K.
Fatemi
,
L. A.
Orozco
, and
S. L.
Rolston
, “
Super-radiance reveals infinite-range dipole interactions through a nanofiber
,”
Nat. Commun.
8
,
1857
(
2017
).
19.
J. S.
Douglas
,
H.
Habibian
,
C.-L.
Hung
,
A. V.
Gorshkov
,
H. J.
Kimble
, and
D. E.
Chang
, “
Quantum many-body models with cold atoms coupled to photonic crystals
,”
Nat. Photonics
9
,
326
331
(
2015
).
20.
C.-L.
Hung
,
A.
González-Tudela
,
J. I.
Cirac
, and
H. J.
Kimble
, “
Quantum spin dynamics with pairwise-tunable, long-range interactions
,”
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
113
,
E4946
E4955
(
2016
).
21.
S.-P.
Yu
,
J. D.
Hood
,
J. A.
Muniz
,
M. J.
Martin
,
R.
Norte
,
C.-L.
Hung
,
S. M.
Meenehan
,
J. D.
Cohen
,
O.
Painter
, and
H. J.
Kimble
, “
Nanowire photonic crystal waveguides for single-atom trapping and strong light-matter interactions
,”
Appl. Phys. Lett.
104
,
111103
(
2014
).
22.
S.-P.
Yu
,
J. A.
Muniz
,
C.-L.
Hung
, and
H.
Kimble
, “
Two-dimensional photonic crystals for engineering atom–light interactions
,”
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
116
,
12743
12751
(
2019
).
23.
T.-H.
Chang
,
B. M.
Fields
,
M. E.
Kim
, and
C.-L.
Hung
, “
Microring resonators on a suspended membrane circuit for atom-light interactions
,”
Optica
6
,
1203
1210
(
2019
).
24.
X.
Luan
et al., “
The integration of photonic crystal waveguides with atom arrays in optical tweezers
,”
Adv. Quantum Technol.
(published online,
2020
).
25.
F.
Le Kien
,
V. I.
Balykin
, and
K.
Hakuta
, “
Atom trap and waveguide using a two-color evanescent light field around a subwavelength-diameter optical fiber
,”
Phys. Rev. A
70
,
063403
(
2004
).
26.
E.
Vetsch
,
D.
Reitz
,
G.
Sagué
,
R.
Schmidt
,
S. T.
Dawkins
, and
A.
Rauschenbeutel
, “
Optical interface created by laser-cooled atoms trapped in the evanescent field surrounding an optical nanofiber
,”
Phys. Rev. Lett.
104
,
203603
(
2010
).
27.
A.
Goban
,
K. S.
Choi
,
D. J.
Alton
,
D.
Ding
,
C.
Lacroûte
,
M.
Pototschnig
,
T.
Thiele
,
N. P.
Stern
, and
H. J.
Kimble
, “
Demonstration of a state-insensitive, compensated nanofiber trap
,”
Phys. Rev. Lett.
109
,
033603
(
2012
).
28.
C.-L.
Hung
,
S. M.
Meenehan
,
D. E.
Chang
,
O.
Painter
, and
H. J.
Kimble
, “
Trapped atoms in one-dimensional photonic crystals
,”
New J. Phys.
15
,
083026
(
2013
).
29.
M. E.
Kim
,
T.-H.
Chang
,
B. M.
Fields
,
C.-A.
Chen
, and
C.-L.
Hung
, “
Trapping single atoms on a nanophotonic circuit with configurable tweezer lattices
,”
Nat. Commun.
10
,
1647
(
2019
).
30.
C.
Rossi
,
P.
Temple-Boyer
, and
D.
Estève
, “
Realization and performance of thin SiO2/SiNx membrane for microheater applications
,”
Sens. Actuators, A
64
,
241
245
(
1998
).
31.
J. B.
Béguin
,
J.
Laurat
,
X.
Luan
,
A. P.
Burgers
,
Z.
Qin
, and
H. J.
Kimble
, “
Reduced volume and reflection for optical tweezers with radial Laguerre-Gauss beams
,” arXiv:2001.11498 (
2020
)..
32.
X.
Ji
,
F. A. S.
Barbosa
,
S. P.
Roberts
,
A.
Dutt
,
J.
Cardenas
,
Y.
Okawachi
,
A.
Bryant
,
A. L.
Gaeta
, and
M.
Lipson
, “
Ultra-low-loss on-chip resonators with sub-milliwatt parametric oscillation threshold
,”
Optica
4
,
619
624
(
2017
).
33.
J.
Cardenas
,
C. B.
Poitras
,
K.
Luke
,
L.
Luo
,
P. A.
Morton
, and
M.
Lipson
, “
High coupling efficiency etched facet tapers in silicon waveguides
,”
IEEE Photonics Technol. Lett.
26
,
2380
2382
(
2014
).
34.
S.
Woetzel
,
F.
Talkenberg
,
T.
Scholtes
,
R.
Ijsselsteijn
,
V.
Schultze
, and
H.-G.
Meyer
, “
Lifetime improvement of micro-fabricated alkali vapor cells by atomic layer deposited wall coatings
,”
Surf. Coat. Technol.
221
,
158
162
(
2013
).
35.
E. R.
Abraham
and
E. A.
Cornell
, “
Teflon feedthrough for coupling optical fibers into ultrahigh vacuum systems
,”
Appl. Opt.
37
,
1762
1763
(
1998
).
36.
E. S.
Hosseini
,
S.
Yegnanarayanan
,
A. H.
Atabaki
,
M.
Soltani
, and
A.
Adibi
, “
Systematic design and fabrication of high-q single-mode pulley-coupled planar silicon nitride microdisk resonators at visible wavelengths
,”
Opt. Express
18
,
2127
2136
(
2010
).
37.
K.
Srinivasan
and
O.
Painter
, “
Mode coupling and cavity–quantum-dot interactions in a fiber-coupled microdisk cavity
,”
Phys. Rev. A
75
,
023814
(
2007
).
38.
N. P.
Stern
,
D. J.
Alton
, and
H. J.
Kimble
, “
Simulations of atomic trajectories near a dielectric surface
,”
New J. Phys.
13
,
085004
(
2011
).
39.
T.
Aoki
,
B.
Dayan
,
E.
Wilcut
,
W. P.
Bowen
,
A. S.
Parkins
,
T.
Kippenberg
,
K.
Vahala
, and
H.
Kimble
, “
Observation of strong coupling between one atom and a monolithic microresonator
,”
Nature
443
,
671
674
(
2006
).
40.
C.
Junge
,
D.
O'Shea
,
J.
Volz
, and
A.
Rauschenbeutel
, “
Strong coupling between single atoms and nontransversal photons
,”
Phys. Rev. Lett.
110
,
213604
(
2013
).
41.
H.
Tanji-Suzuki
,
W.
Chen
,
R.
Landig
,
J.
Simon
, and
V.
Vuletić
, “
Vacuum-induced transparency
,”
Science
333
,
1266
1269
(
2011
).
42.
M.
Mücke
,
E.
Figueroa
,
J.
Bochmann
,
C.
Hahn
,
K.
Murr
,
S.
Ritter
,
C. J.
Villas-Boas
, and
G.
Rempe
, “
Electromagnetically induced transparency with single atoms in a cavity
,”
Nature
465
,
755
758
(
2010
).
43.
I.
Shomroni
,
S.
Rosenblum
,
Y.
Lovsky
,
O.
Bechler
,
G.
Guendelman
, and
B.
Dayan
, “
All-optical routing of single photons by a one-atom switch controlled by a single photon
,”
Science
345
,
903
906
(
2014
).
44.
T. V.
Mechelen
and
Z.
Jacob
, “
Universal spin-momentum locking of evanescent waves
,”
Optica
3
,
118
126
(
2016
).
45.
P.
Lodahl
,
S.
Mahmoodian
,
S.
Stobbe
,
A.
Rauschenbeutel
,
P.
Schneeweiss
,
J.
Volz
,
H.
Pichler
, and
P.
Zoller
, “
Chiral quantum optics
,”
Nature
541
,
473
480
(
2017
).
46.
G. A.
Porkolab
,
P.
Apiratikul
,
B.
Wang
,
S. H.
Guo
, and
C. J. K.
Richardson
, “
Low propagation loss algaas waveguides fabricated with plasma-assisted photoresist reflow
,”
Opt. Express
22
,
7733
7743
(
2014
).
47.
Y.
Meng
,
C.
Liedl
,
S.
Pucher
,
A.
Rauschenbeutel
, and
P.
Schneeweiss
, “
Imaging and localizing individual atoms interfaced with a nanophotonic waveguide
,”
Phys. Rev. Lett.
125
,
053603
(
2020
).