We investigate the effect of strain on the two-dimensional electron gas (2DEG) channel in a flexible Al0.25Ga0.75N/GaN high-electron-mobility transistor (HEMT) by mechanical bending to prove the concept of active polarization engineering to create multifunctional electronic and photonic devices made of flexible group III-nitride thin films. The flexible HEMTs are fabricated by a layer-transfer process and integrated with a 150-μm-thick Cu film. The strain values are estimated from high-resolution x-ray diffraction and Raman spectroscopy in 4-cm bend-down and −4-cm bend-up test conditions. The strain-induced piezoelectric polarization can alter the charge density of the 2DEG in the channel at the AlGaN/GaN interface and thus modify the output characteristics of the flexible HEMTs. Accordingly, output characteristics show an increase in output current by 3.4% in the bend-down condition and a decrease by 4.3% in the bend-up condition. Transfer characteristics show a shift of threshold voltage, which also supports the 2DEG channel modulation during bending. Computational simulation based on the same structure confirms the same current modulation effect and threshold voltage shift. Furthermore, the electrical characteristics of the flexible HEMTs show a repeatable dependence on the strain effect, which offers potential for electro-mechanical device applications.

Mechanically flexible electronic and photonic devices based on group-III-nitride (III-N) thin films have been developed for potential system applications of wireless communication, radars, flexible displays, electro-mechanical sensing, and energy harvesting.1–4 Most of these studies focused on the mechanical bendability of the structure while minimizing the performance degradation of the devices, which is important in many applications. However, flexible devices made of III-N thin films have implications surpassing merely the ability to fabricate bendable devices. Owing to the unique piezoelectric properties of III-N materials, external strain applied during bending can be exploited to control device characteristics and to provide additional functionality. Shervin et al. have proposed strain-effect transistors, suggesting that the transfer characteristics and operation mode of III-N high-electron-mobility transistors (HEMTs) can be modified by external bending without applying gate biases.5 Shervin et al. also suggested that controlled external bending can lead to improvements in internal quantum efficiency and emission wavelength tunability of light-emitting diodes (LEDs).6,7 Furthermore, as opposed to an n-type two-dimensional electron gas (2DEG) channel in HEMTs, Wang et al. demonstrated that the formation of a p-type two-dimensional hole gas (2DHG) channel is possible in flexible InxAl1−xN/GaN heterostructures by bending, possibly enabling high-hole-mobility transistors.8 However, the aforementioned reports are only based on numerical modeling. No systematic study has been performed, which also experimentally demonstrates and proves the feasibility of such multifunctional electronic and photonic devices. For experimental demonstration, substantial controlled strain has to be applied in the device active region, which is challenging in the structures of typical flexible devices due to the low elastic modulus of commonly used flexible polymer substrates. In this case, the neutral plane of the structure during bending is within the III-N semiconductor layer (refer to the section entitled “Neutral plane of multi-layered structure” in the supplementary material), and thus, a significantly high degree of bending is necessary to achieve sufficient strain. However, these bending conditions cause mobility reduction and device degradation.9 Additionally, flexible HEMTs on a polymeric substrate suffer from significantly reduced current due to the self-heating effect, which limits their high-power applications in flexible electronics.10,11 To overcome the challenges associated with experimentally proving the concept of multifunctional flexible III-N devices, a flexible substrate that possesses a high elastic modulus and high thermal conductivity is required. Flexible copper (Cu) substrates can satisfy this requirement as they offer both high elastic modulus (∼130 GPa) and high thermal conductivity (∼400 W/m K). It was previously demonstrated that the use of a Cu substrate for flexible HEMTs suppresses the self-heating effect.12 

The multifunctionality of flexible III-N electronic and photonic devices originates from the electronic band structure modification as a result of changes in piezoelectric charges at the heterostructure interface. Therefore, for the proof of concept, it is necessary to confirm that the electronic band structure and its associated device characteristics are changed according to the controlled strain imposed by external bending. The authors previously demonstrated that the electronic band structure in AlGaN/GaN HEMTs can be modified by the polarization modulation effect of a single-crystalline piezoelectric BeO cap layer, resulting in a 14% increase in the 2DEG density.13 This previous report shows the feasibility of polarization engineering in III-N heterostructures, but not specifically for flexible devices. In the present study, we systematically investigate the changes in device characteristics from the band structure modification in flexible AlGaN/GaN HEMTs, which originates from the strain induced by bending in order to prove the concept of the proposed multifunctional devices enabled by active polarization engineering. The III-N heterostructure was epitaxially grown on a Si substrate to simplify the substrate removal process; this process has been demonstrated previously for the fabrication of flexible III-N thin film piezoelectric energy harvesters and sensors.14,15 A similar process was applied to fabricate the flexible HEMTs on a Cu film in this study. We integrate the flexible HEMT with Cu by electroplating and achieve both high stiffness and high heat dissipation. Moreover, active current modulation by external strain is observed, which proves the concept of active polarization engineering in flexible III-N thin film heterostructures, which was not demonstrated in the previous studies.

The III-N HEMTs have a typical layer structure consisting of an Al0.25Ga0.75N Schottky barrier layer (20 nm) and a GaN layer (2 μm) on a Si (111) substrate with AlN and AlGaN buffer layers. A patterned stack of Ti/Al/Ni/Au (20/80/50/50 nm) metal layers was deposited by electron-beam evaporation followed by rapid thermal annealing at 850 °C in a nitrogen (N2) atmosphere to form source and drain electrodes. Another patterned stack of Ni/Au (50/50 nm) metal layers was deposited between the source and drain to serve as a gate electrode. The HEMT-on-Si sample was first flipped over and attached to a temporary sapphire carrier wafer. The Si substrate was then removed by wet etching. Cr/Au (10/200 nm) metal layers were deposited on the back surface of the III-N epitaxial structure that was exposed after substrate removal. Finally, a 150-μm-thick Cu film was deposited on the Cr/Au layer by electroplating using CuSO4 electrolyte solution. All the deposited metal layers are expected to achieve a non-slip and void-free condition at the interfaces, unlike typical bonded interfaces. Therefore, a semiconductor heterostructure and a Cu plate were bent together as one body.

Figure 1 shows a schematic cross section of the flexible HEMT structure. A neutral plane, yneutral (indicated by a blue dotted line), is located around the middle of the Cu layer (refer to the section entitled “Neutral plane of multi-layered structure” in the supplementary material). In this case, the AlGaN/GaN heterostructure always experiences uniaxial in-plane external strain during bending. When the flexible structure on the Cu film is bent concavely with the radius of curvature R <0 (defined as the bend-up condition in this study), in-plane compressive strain is applied in the III-N layer, i.e., εxx < 0. Conversely, when the flexible structure is bent convexly with R >0 (bend-down condition), in-plane tensile strain is applied (εxx > 0). The bending radius was set at ±4 cm. In such conditions, we believe that substantial strain can be induced in the 2DEG channel, while plastic deformation or device degradation is avoided. The reproducibility of bending was confirmed, and no current drop or change was observed after repeated bending cycles. The bending condition and its associated device characteristics were reproducible.

FIG. 1.

Schematic cross-sectional structure of the flexible high-electron-mobility transistor (HEMT) and the bend-up test condition.

FIG. 1.

Schematic cross-sectional structure of the flexible high-electron-mobility transistor (HEMT) and the bend-up test condition.

Close modal

The strain applied in the GaN channel during bending was estimated from the lattice parameters measured by high-resolution x-ray diffraction (HR-XRD, Bruker, D8 Discover). Figure 2 shows the symmetric 2theta-omega scans in flat (black), bend-down (red), bend-up (blue), and re-flat (green) conditions. The bending direction is perpendicular to the x-ray diffraction plane to minimize the peak broadening caused by curved surfaces. For the bend-down condition (R =4 cm), the GaN (002) peak (∼34.6°) shifts to the right by 0.079° due to the reduction of the out-of-plane lattice constant c under in-plane tensile strain. Conversely, the GaN (002) peak shifts to the left by 0.087° in the bend-up condition (R = −4 cm). Asymmetric (102) plane 2theta-omega scans were also measured, and the lattice spacings d(002) and d(102) were calculated by the Bragg law. As shown in the inset of Fig. 2 (top right), rotational scans (phi scan) around (102) planes were measured and six peaks with 60° internal spacings in the flat condition (black) indicate the sixfold symmetry of the hexagonal GaN crystal structure. As shown in the left inset of Fig. 2, we assume that the uniaxial tensile stress in the x direction by 1-dimensional bending causes the orthorhombic distortion of the hexagonal biaxial plane (ab) with a distortion angle of δ0.36°.16 The lattice constants a and b of the distorted biaxial plane can be calculated by

1d(102)2=1a2sin2(120δ)+4c2,
(1)
b=2asin(120δ)2(1cos(120δ)),
(2)

where a is calculated to be 0.3178 nm and b to be 0.3196 nm. Thus, the anisotropic strain values can be calculated by17 

{εxx=(d1d10)/d10,εyy=(d2d20)/d20,εzz=(cc0)/c0,
(3)

where d1=b, d10=a0, d2=asin(120δ)/2(1+cos(120δ)), and d20=3a0/2. a0 and c0 are the lattice constants of GaN without distortion at the flat condition. Table I summarizes the calculated lattice constants and strains in different bending conditions. For the 4-cm bend-down condition, in-plane strain values of εxx=0.57% and εyy=0.18% are calculated. Similarly, for the 4-cm bend-up condition, in-plane strain values of εxx=0.59% and εyy=0.21% are calculated. Raman spectroscopy was also performed with a Horiba LabRAM HR Evolution spectrometer using 532 nm excitation in a 180° backscattering configuration.18 The in-plane strain values of 0.09% in the bend-down condition and −0.13% in the bend-up condition are calculated (refer to the section entitled “Uniaxial strain measurement by Raman spectroscopy” in the supplementary material).

FIG. 2.

Symmetric x-ray 2theta-omega scans of a flexible HEMT structure in flat (black), bend-down (red), bend-up (blue), and re-flat (green) test conditions. The insets show the orthorhombic distortion of the hexagonal biaxial plane under uniaxial strain (left) and rotational phi scans on the GaN {102} plane (top right).

FIG. 2.

Symmetric x-ray 2theta-omega scans of a flexible HEMT structure in flat (black), bend-down (red), bend-up (blue), and re-flat (green) test conditions. The insets show the orthorhombic distortion of the hexagonal biaxial plane under uniaxial strain (left) and rotational phi scans on the GaN {102} plane (top right).

Close modal
TABLE I.

HR-XRD results and calculated strain based on the orthorhombic distortion of the hexagonal biaxial plane under uniaxial strain at flat, bend-down, bend-up, and re-flat conditions.

d102 (Å)c (Å)a (Å)b (Å)εxxεyyεzz
Flat 1.889 5.1968 3.1783 3.1783 … … … 
Bend-down 1.890 5.1853 3.1781 3.1964 0.57% −0.18% 0.22% 
Bend-up 1.888 5.2110 3.1786 3.1597 −0.59% 0.21% −0.25% 
Re-flat 1.889 5.1983 3.1770 3.1770 −0.04% −0.04% 0.03% 
d102 (Å)c (Å)a (Å)b (Å)εxxεyyεzz
Flat 1.889 5.1968 3.1783 3.1783 … … … 
Bend-down 1.890 5.1853 3.1781 3.1964 0.57% −0.18% 0.22% 
Bend-up 1.888 5.2110 3.1786 3.1597 −0.59% 0.21% −0.25% 
Re-flat 1.889 5.1983 3.1770 3.1770 −0.04% −0.04% 0.03% 

IV characteristics of the flexible HEMTs in various bending conditions were then measured. The device dimensions include a gate length of Lg = 10 μm, a gate–drain distance of Lgd = 30 μm, a gate-source distance of Lgs = 15 μm, and a channel width of Wg = 100 μm. Figure 3 shows the IdsVds characteristics of a flexible HEMT in the flat (black), bend-down (red), bend-up (blue), and re-flat (green) conditions with no applied gate voltage (Vg = 0 V). The bending direction is perpendicular to the source-to-drain direction to avoid decreased mobility resulting from the channel curvature,19,20 as shown in the insets of Fig. 3. Data from the first (solid circle) and second (hollow circle) bending cycle show a good repeatability of the strain effect in the flexible HEMT. Current modulation by the applied strain is observed. The saturation current Ids at Vds = 20 V is measured to be 74.6 mA, 77.1 mA, 75.1 mA, 71.0 mA, 77.2 mA, 75.3 mA, and 72.2 mA in the flat, first bend-down, first re-flat, first bend-up, second bend-down, second re-flat, and second bend-up conditions, respectively. The average changes in the saturation current are 3.4% for the bend-down condition and 4.3% for the bend-up condition. Moreover, the changes in threshold voltage in transfer characteristics are observed (refer to the section entitled “Transfer characteristics of flexible HEMT by bending” in the supplementary material).

FIG. 3.

Output characteristics (IdsVds) of a flexible HEMT in flat (black), bend-down (red), re-flat (green), and bend-up (blue) test conditions during the first (solid circle) and second (hollow circle) bending cycles. The top insets show the measurement setup for each bending condition. The bottom inset shows an optical photomicrograph of the HEMT device and the direction of in-plane strain in the bend-up and bend-down test conditions.

FIG. 3.

Output characteristics (IdsVds) of a flexible HEMT in flat (black), bend-down (red), re-flat (green), and bend-up (blue) test conditions during the first (solid circle) and second (hollow circle) bending cycles. The top insets show the measurement setup for each bending condition. The bottom inset shows an optical photomicrograph of the HEMT device and the direction of in-plane strain in the bend-up and bend-down test conditions.

Close modal

Computational simulation based on this structure was performed.21 Minor discrepancies were observed between the strain values measured by HR-XRD and Raman spectroscopy. Since HR-XRD is more sensitive to the strain near the surface close to the 2DEG, strain values of εxx+εyy=0.39% and εxx+εyy=0.38% from HR-XRD were used for the modeling of the flexible AlGaN/GaN HEMT. Figure 4 shows simulated output characteristics of the flexible HEMT with different bending conditions. The 2DEG mobility is set to 1200 cm2/V s, and the change in mobility due to the altered effective mass during bending is considered to be negligible.22 The change in Ids shows a typical depletion-mode n-type channel and decreases with more negative gate bias. Source–drain current Ids can be modified by the applied strain at different gate voltages. For Vg = 0 V, saturation Ids increases by 4.33% for the 4-cm bend-down condition and decreases by 4.29% for the −4-cm bend-up condition. The strain-induced change in current from simulation agrees well with the experimental results in both the transfer and output characteristics, which confirms the current modulation effect from the applied strain.

FIG. 4.

Simulated output characteristics (IdsVds) of a flexible HEMT in flat (black), bend-down (red), and bend-up (blue) test conditions.

FIG. 4.

Simulated output characteristics (IdsVds) of a flexible HEMT in flat (black), bend-down (red), and bend-up (blue) test conditions.

Close modal

The origin of this current modulation effect is due to the change in the 2DEG density when strain is applied. The general expression for sheet charge density in a HEMT device is given by23 

ns=σpolεAlGaNqdAlGaN[ϕBn+EF(ns)ΔEC],
(4)

where σpol is the total spontaneous and piezoelectric polarization induced charge concentration, εAlGaN and dAlGaN are the permittivity and thickness of the AlGaN barrier layer, q is the electron charge, ϕBn is the Schottky barrier, and EF(ns) and ΔEC are the quantum well depth and conduction band offset at the AlGaN/GaN interface, respectively. ϕBn is a strong function of both strain and interface state density. However, the leakage current (IgsVgs) was measured at different bending conditions and there was no observable change with positive gate bias, which indicates that the Schottky barrier height is not changed. This could be related to an increased surface state density as a result of strain induced defects when bending is applied, which offsets the strain effect on the Schottky barrier height.23,24 The change in the 2DEG density Δns is then simplified as a change in polarization charge Δσpol during bending. Δσpol can be calculated as Δσpol=(ΔPpz),25 where ΔPpz, which is the additional piezoelectric polarization field during 1D bending, can be calculated as

ΔPpz=[e31(εxx+εyy)+e33εzz]AlGaN[e31(εxx+εyy)+e33εzz]GaN,
(5)

where e31,e33 are the piezoelectric constants of GaN and Al0.25Ga0.75N.26,27 Adopting the uniaxial tensile strain in the 4-cm bend-down condition (εyy=0.57%,εyy=0.18%,εzz=0.22%), ΔPpz is found to be −5.09 × 10−4 C/m2. This additional negative piezoelectric polarization field can induce more positive polarization charge Δσpol at the interface and attract a higher level of sheet electron density. A greater negative gate voltage is needed to fully deplete this enhanced 2DEG channel, and thus, a negative shift of threshold voltage is observed (refer to the section entitled “Transfer characteristics of flexible HEMT by bending” in the supplementary material). Conversely, when uniaxial compressive strain is applied in the −4-cm bend-up condition (εyy=0.59%,εyy=0.21%,εzz=0.25%), ΔPpz is found to be 5.61 × 10−4 C/m2. Additional negative polarization charge is formed and thus reduces the 2DEG sheet concentration and shifts the threshold voltage in the positive direction.

In summary, we studied the strain effect in a flexible Al0.25Ga0.75N/GaN HEMT via both numerical simulation and experimental demonstration. The flexible HEMTs were fabricated by a layer-transfer process and integrated with a 150-μm-thick Cu film by electroplating. HR-XRD was used to estimate in-plane strains of εxx=0.57%,εyy=0.18% and εxx=0.59%,εyy=0.21% for 4-cm bend-down and −4-cm bend-up test conditions, respectively. From the measured output characteristics, current changes of 3.4% and −4.3% were observed in the bend-down and bend-up test conditions, respectively. Threshold voltage shifts were also observed, which indicated changes in the 2DEG sheet density in the channel during bending. Computational simulation was performed, where a 4.3% current modulation was demonstrated. The origin of current modulation was discussed, and we believe that piezoelectric polarization charge induced by the applied strain altered the 2DEG density in the channel and thus resulted in changes in the drain current. Even greater changes in the polarization charge and more current modulation can be expected if InAlN with larger negative piezoelectric constants is used as the barrier layer. This strain effect of the flexible HEMTs offers the potential for wearable electro-mechanical devices for sensor, transducer, and actuator applications.

See the supplementary material for the complete neutral plane calculation, strain measurements by Raman spectroscopy, and transfer characteristics with bending.

This material is based upon the work at the University of Houston supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant No. 1842299 [Electrical, Communications and Cyber Systems (ECCS)] and the King Abdullah University of Science and Technology (KAUST), Saudi Arabia (Contract No. OSR-2017-CRG6-3437.02). J.H.R. also acknowledges partial support from the Texas Center for Superconductivity at the University of Houston (TcSUH) and Advanced Manufacturing Institute (AMI). Funding for efforts by the Pennsylvania State University was provided by the AFOSR Young Investigator Program (Grant No. 265 FA9550-17-1-0141, Program Officers: Dr. Brett Pokines, and Dr. Michael Kendra, also monitored by Dr. Kenneth Goretta).

1.
C.-W.
Sher
,
K.-J.
Chen
,
C.-C.
Lin
,
H.-V.
Han
,
H.-Y.
Lin
,
Z.-Y.
Tu
,
H.-H.
Tu
,
K.
Honjo
,
H.-Y.
Jiang
,
S.-L.
Ou
,
R.-H.
Horng
,
X.
Li
,
C.-C.
Fu
, and
H.-C.
Kuo
,
Opt. Express
23
,
A1167
(
2015
).
2.
A.
Vinel
,
W. S. E.
Chen
,
N. N.
Xiong
,
S.
Rho
,
N.
Clilamkurti
, and
A. V.
Vasilaks
,
IEEE Wireless Commun.
23
,
8
(
2016
).
3.
N.
Petrone
,
I.
Meric
,
T.
Chari
,
K. L.
Shepard
, and
J.
Hone
,
IEEE J. Electron Devices Soc.
3
,
44
(
2015
).
4.
Y. H.
Jung
,
H.
Zhang
,
S. J.
Cho
, and
Z.
Ma
,
IEEE Trans. Electron Devices
64
,
1881
(
2017
).
5.
S.
Shervin
,
S.-H.
Kim
,
M.
Asadirad
,
S.
Ravipati
,
K.-H.
Lee
,
K.
Bulashevich
, and
J.-H.
Ryou
,
Appl. Phys. Lett.
107
,
193504
(
2015
).
6.
S.
Shervin
,
S. K.
Oh
,
H. J.
Park
,
K.-H.
Lee
,
M.
Asadirad
,
S. H.
Kim
,
J.
Kim
,
S.
Pouladi
,
S.-N.
Lee
,
X.
Li
,
J. S.
Kwak
, and
J.-H.
Ryou
,
J. Phys. D
51
,
105105
(
2018
).
7.
S.
Shervin
,
S.-H.
Kim
,
M.
Asadirad
,
S. Y.
Kapov
,
D.
Zimina
, and
J.-H.
Ryou
,
ACS Photonics
3
,
486
(
2016
).
8.
W.
Wang
,
S.
Shervin
,
S. K.
Oh
,
J.
Chen
,
Y.
Huai
,
S.
Pouladi
,
H.
Kim
,
S.-N.
Lee
, and
J.-H.
Ryou
,
IEEE Electron Device Lett.
38
,
1086
(
2017
).
9.
N. R.
Glavin
,
K. D.
Chabak
,
E. R.
Heller
,
E. A.
Moore
,
T. A.
Prusnick
,
B.
Maruyama
,
D. E.
Walker
, Jr.
,
D. L.
Dorsey
,
Q.
Paduano
, and
M.
Snure
,
Adv. Mater.
29
,
1701838
(
2017
).
10.
K. J.
Lee
,
M. A.
Meitl
,
J. H.
Ahn
,
J. A.
Rogers
,
R. G.
Nuzzo
,
V.
Kumar
, and
I.
Adesida
,
J. Appl. Phys.
100
,
124507
(
2006
).
11.
M.
Lesecq
,
V.
Hoel
,
A.
Lecavelier des Etangs-Levallois
,
E.
Pichonat
,
Y.
Douvey
, and
J. C.
De Jaeger
,
IEEE Electron Device Lett.
32
,
143
(
2011
).
12.
S. K.
Oh
,
M. U.
Cho
,
J.
Dallas
,
T.
Jang
,
D. G.
Lee
,
S.
Pouladi
,
J.
Chen
,
W.
Wang
,
S.
Shervin
,
H.
Kim
,
S.
Shin
,
S.
Choi
,
J. S.
Kwak
, and
J.-H.
Ryou
,
Appl. Phys. Lett.
111
,
133502
(
2017
).
13.
W.
Wang
,
S. M.
Lee
,
S.
Pouladi
,
J.
Chen
,
S.
Shervin
,
S.
Yoon
,
J. H.
Yum
,
E. S.
Larsen
,
C. W.
Bielawski
,
B.
Chatterjee
,
S.
Choi
,
J.
Oh
, and
J.-H.
Ryou
,
Appl. Phys. Lett.
115
,
103502
(
2019
).
14.
J.
Chen
,
S. K.
Oh
,
N.
Nabulsi
,
H.
Johnson
,
W.
Wang
, and
J.-H.
Ryou
,
Nano Energy
57
,
670
(
2019
).
15.
J.
Chen
,
H.
Liu
,
W.
Wang
,
N.
Nabulsi
,
W.
Zhao
,
J. Y.
Kim
,
M.-K.
Kwon
, and
J.-H.
Ryou
,
Adv. Funct. Mater.
29
,
1903162
(
2019
).
16.
A. P.
Boresi
and
R. J.
Schmidt
,
Advanced Mechanics of Materials
, 6th ed. (
Wiley
,
Hoboken, NJ, USA
,
2002
).
17.
M. R.
Laskar
,
T.
Ganguli
,
A. A.
Rahman
,
A.
Mukherjee
,
N.
Hatui
,
M. R.
Gokhale
, and
A.
Bhattacharya
,
J. Appl. Phys.
109
,
013107
(
2011
).
18.
A.
Bansal
,
K.
Wang
,
J. S.
Lundh
,
S.
Choi
, and
J. M.
Redwing
,
Appl. Phys. Lett.
114
,
142101
(
2019
).
19.
Y.
Gao
,
M.
Asadirad
,
Y.
Yao
,
P.
Dutta
,
E.
Galstyan
,
S.
Shervin
,
K.-H.
Lee
,
S.
Pouladi
,
S.
Sun
,
Y.
Li
,
M.
Rathi
,
J.-H.
Ryou
, and
V.
Selvamanickam
,
ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces
8
,
29565
(
2016
).
20.
M.
Asadirad
,
S.
Pouladi
,
S.
Shervin
,
S. K.
Oh
,
K. H.
Lee
,
J.
Kim
,
S.-N.
Lee
,
Y.
Gao
,
P.
Dutta
,
V.
Selvamanickam
, and
J.-H.
Ryou
,
IEEE Electron Device Lett.
38
,
217
(
2017
).
21.
See http://www.str-soft.com/products/FETIS for “
Capabilities and Brief Physical Model
.”
22.
C. E.
Dreyer
,
A.
Janotti
, and
C. G.
Van de Walle
,
Appl. Phys. Lett.
102
,
142105
(
2013
).
23.
K.
Yao
,
S.
Khandelwal
,
F.
Sammoura
,
A.
Kazama
,
C.
Hu
, and
L.
Lin
,
IEEE Electron Device Lett.
36
,
902
(
2015
).
24.
A.
Wang
,
L.
Zeng
, and
W.
Wang
,
Mater. Res. Express
5
,
025903
(
2018
).
25.
E. T.
Yu
,
X. Z.
Dang
,
P. M.
Asbeck
,
S. S.
Lau
, and
G. J.
Sullivan
,
J. Vac. Sci. Technol., B
17
,
1742
(
1999
).
26.
J.-H.
Ryou
,
P. D.
Yoder
,
J.
Liu
,
Z.
Lochner
,
H.
Kim
,
S.
Choi
,
H. J.
Kim
, and
R. D.
Dupuis
,
IEEE J. Sel. Top. Quantum Electron.
15
,
1080
(
2009
).
27.
J.
Kuzmik
,
Semicond. Sci. Technol.
17
,
540
(
2002
).

Supplementary Material