We demonstrate the quantitative spectroscopic characterization and imaging of biological tissue using coherent time-domain microscopy with a femtosecond resolution. We identify tissue constituents and perform dephasing time (T2) measurements of characteristic Raman active vibrations. This was shown in subcutaneous mouse fat embedded within collagen rich areas of the dermis and the muscle connective tissue. The demonstrated equivalent spectral resolution (<0.3 cm−1) is an order of magnitude better compared to commonly used frequency-domain methods for characterization of biological media. This provides with the important dimensions and parameters in biological media characterization and can become an effective tool in detecting minute changes in the bio-molecular composition and environment that is critical for molecular level diagnosis.

Fundamental nonlinear optical phenomena have been shown to be useful in applications related to noninvasive characterization of biological media.1–4 Raman scattering based techniques, both spontaneous and coherent versions, are of particular interest since their spectroscopic power can deliver molecular sensitive information that can become a key in early diagnosis of diseases. The absolute majority of relevant applications of the techniques is, for natural reasons, in the frequency domain. The coherent Raman microscopy studies were primarily applied to highlight tissue and cell constituents by producing high-contrast images at targeted Raman active vibration.5,6 Spontaneous Raman version has been applied with greater focus towards detection of spectral features within cells and tissue.7 However, the reported results have been limited to obtaining characteristic multi-line spectra and detecting relative changes in the intensities and spectral shifts with a goal of correlating those with biomolecular alterations occurring at the sub-cellular level.8 The true spectroscopic strength, which would ultimately include the resolution of molecular vibration damping rates Γ (or linewidths, Δν = 1/Γ) and line shapes, has not been enabled and demonstrated. It is worth noting that the damping rate is directly affected by inter- and intra-molecular interactions. Therefore, the ability to measure Raman line shapes with a precision is absolutely crucial from that point of view. Depending on the immediate molecular environment (e.g., density and viscosity) and the composition of tissue and cells, linewidths for the investigated Raman active modes can vary broadly. For instance, solute-solvent interactions in aqueous solutions can result in the 0.3–7.5 cm−1 linewidth range, which depends on the molar ratio.9 Both the spontaneous Raman and frequency domains have the best possible resolution of ∼3–7 cm−1. The limits are imposed by the detection sensitivity in spontaneous Raman spectroscopy. Laser pulse bandwidths (∼3–10 cm−1) employed in coherent Raman microscopy do not provide a better resolution either. In addition, for the latter case, the need to adjust laser wavelength in point-by-point spectral measurements adversely impacts the spectral resolution and precision. As a result, it becomes impossible to measure and detect Raman line shapes and bandwidths with a desired precision.

An alternative to the frequency-domain Raman scattering techniques is time-domain Coherent Anti-Stokes Raman Scattering (t-d CARS) spectroscopy. The CARS signal can be viewed as a result of scattering of a probe pulse with amplitude Epr on the coherence built in the material. The initial coherence is the result of individual molecular displacements (qi) being phased in by the excitation pair of pulses (E1, E2) with the difference frequency (ω12) matching Raman active vibration (ωR). The action results in the macroscopic coherent amplitude (Q). The coherence starts to decay freely in time as a consequence of various inter- and intra-molecular interactions that lead to changes in the phase (pure dephasing) and the amplitude of the individual vibrations. The ensemble averaged solution for Q contains the autocorrelation function that yields q(t)q(t)=exp(|tt|/T2) for the case of phase changing collisions that dominate the interactions. Constant T2 represents the characteristic dephasing time, and the Raman active line is homogeneously broadened with the linewidth of

(1)

expressed in wavenumber units.

The CARS signal is detected at anti-Stokes frequency (ωas=ωpr+ω1ω2). The non-resonant background can be more efficiently suppressed in t-d CARS down to the level of detector's dark, which is different from the case of a coherent frequency-domain method. This gives an opportunity to detect really weak Raman active lines and potentially the ones that cannot be detected by spontaneous or coherent Raman spectroscopy. Tracing the t-d CARS signal at longer delays (i.e., slower resonant part) within a decade translates to better than few percent precision in T2 (Δν) measurements.10 In other words, t-d CARS can result in the Green's function (G(t)) for the molecular system as a response to the ultrashort (E1(t),E2(t))–pulse excitation. An ability to measure G(t) on an extended timescale and within the high dynamic range provides much more fine information about the corresponding Raman lineshape.10 The lower limit for the equivalent spectral resolution is determined by one's ability to trace the t-d CARS signal for as long time delays as possible.

The goal of this work is the direct dephasing time (T2) measurement of specific molecular vibrations within biological tissue. We demonstrate the detection of time-domain replica within biological tissue, traced within more than one decade, for important and previously unresolved Raman signature lines within fat cells. The ability to measure the corresponding dephasing times with high precision resulted in an equivalent spectral resolution of better than 0.3 cm−1. This constitutes another important point since the achieved resolution is an order of magnitude better than the one that can be ultimately achieved by frequency-domain approaches applied to tissue or cell characterization. These highlight the strong potential of the time-domain approach with regard to biochemical and biomedical applications that seek reliable molecular level indicators for early disease diagnosis, etc. The only demonstration of the time-domain CARS microscopy showed lower sensitivity and was limited to artificial structures like polysterene beads probed at much stronger Raman resonance.11 

The ultrashort pulses (E1,E2) are generated by independently tunable (960–1120 nm) optical parametric oscillators (OPO) at a repetition rate of 76 MHz.12 A small part of femtosecond Ti:sapphire laser output, which simultaneously pumped the OPOs, served as a third color pulse (Epr) that can be delayed. The three pulses are intrinsically synchronized in time.

For the case of biological tissue, generated SHG and CARS signals are detected in the backward direction. SHG and CARS signals were filtered by the appropriate bandpass filter and diffraction grating with 1200 grooves/mm. The cooled photomultiplier tube detector has a gain of up to 107, high cathode sensitivity, and a dark current below 1 nA. The detected signal was digitized by data acquisition card. The card also provided synchronized analog signals to drive x-y galvo-scanners in order to generate raster scans for imaging. SHG and time-delayed CARS images can be generated with a spatial resolution of 300 nm using a high-numerical aperture (NA = 1.2) objective.

The tissue samples used in this investigation were dissected from above the longissimus dorsi muscle of C57BL/6 mice after euthanasia with outer and inner surfaces of the adipose tissue identified. Slices of up to 100 μm in thickness were fixed for 1 h in 4% paraformaldehyde at 3 °C. The coverslips were treated with gelatin-chromium potassium sulfate solution for an optimal tissue contact.

Figure 1(a) shows a SHG image obtained with a scanned fundamental beam, at optical frequency ω2, delivered by one of the OPOs tuned to ∼1095 nm. The image shows a high SHG signal within the collagen type-II rich areas within the dermis and connective muscle tissue for which the second order optical nonlinearity is strong due to the lack of the inversion center in the molecular structure of this type of protein.

FIG. 1.

(a) SHG image obtained from the mouse dermis area; (b) CARS image of the same area at zero delay time between the probe (Epr) and driving (E1,E2) pulses and ω12 = 1072 cm−1. (c)–(f) CARS images at different delay times.

FIG. 1.

(a) SHG image obtained from the mouse dermis area; (b) CARS image of the same area at zero delay time between the probe (Epr) and driving (E1,E2) pulses and ω12 = 1072 cm−1. (c)–(f) CARS images at different delay times.

Close modal

There are fairly large areas in between the collagen areas where the SHG signal is absent. The collagen bundles could sustain 30–40 mW average power levels at this wavelength in the scanning mode of 2 frames/s without the collagen fibrils being visibly altered or damaged. With the focused beam fixed on one spot within the collagen rich area, detectable damage could occur within the timeframe of few minutes. Figure 1(b) shows the CARS image of the same area at zero time delay. The OPO wavelengths were tuned to 978 nm and 1095 nm, respectively, so that the targeted Raman active mode is at a frequency shift of ω12 ≈ 1072 cm−1. Some collagen bundles seen in Fig. 1(a) can be still fairly well identified in the CARS image. However, the contrast is significantly lower with respect to surrounding areas. The image shows very strong signals coming from the areas where the SHG signal was absent. These parts are filled with dense mouse fat as this was further confirmed by time-domain CARS measurements. Unlike the collagen, the structure of the fat molecules is centro-symmetric, and therefore, the areas with the fat are not seen in the SHG image. The CARS image clearly resolves a blood vessel with red blood cells (RBC) that do not have any trace in the SHG image. CARS and SHG images complement each other in a useful way. SHG imaging modality helped in positioning of the sample so that the other two beams can be blocked to minimize the risk of damage while we were identifying parts of tissue to be characterized. The CARS image shown in Fig. 1(c) was obtained when the probe pulse was delayed by 200 fs (td = 200 fs) with respect to the excitation pair. Both (b) and (c) images rather display a frequency unspecific non-resonant CARS background. Indeed, the contrast ratio between fat tissue part and the remaining background remains about the same with a maximum value of about factor of 2.8. When the delay is further increased beyond 500 fs, the contrast drastically improves and the ratio of the CARS signal within the fat tissue and the surrounding areas can exceed an order of magnitude [Figs. 1(d) and 1(e)].

Figure 2(a) shows the CARS signal versus delay time when Raman active vibrations within the ∼1075 cm1 vicinity were targeted. For this case, the scanning area was reduced (∼20 × 20 μm2) to match a large piece of fat located at around the center of the image shown in Fig. 1(b). Signal fluctuations are fairly high, and the signal-to-noise ratio is about factor of 5 despite the fact that the data were effectively averaged across more than the 4000 pixel area. The data quality degraded further if the scanning was not performed, and this has been the case for fairly moderate (i.e., <25 mW in combined power for the three beams) average power levels focused into the fat area. Some observations indicate that the tissue samples have been altered due to accumulated excess heat and high peak powers that lead to molecular ionization. The detailed study on this issue has not been performed. The obtained CARS transient clearly shows at least two spectral components that result in the coherent beat signal. The decay time is fairly long (∼2 ps), and there is an indication of different decay times for the components. This can be noticed in the decreased modulation depth for the beat signal at longer time delays. The obtained transients have been further analyzed by generating theoretical curves to fit the experimental data. We have applied a model that is based on time dynamics of the macroscopic coherent amplitude (Q).13 The time-domain CARS signal can then be calculated by using the following formulae:

(2)
(3)

In the above equations, ε1,2,pr(t) stand for unit area driving and probe pulses, ξ0 denotes the detected anti-Stokes signal at zero delay, and G(t)denotes the response (Green's) function of the corresponding vibrational system to δ-pulsed driving fields. Applying certain solution algorithms for the above Fredholm type-I equations, G(t) can be retrieved for arbitrarily shaped pulses.8 We can also seek solution for the G(t) function for our case of (i) Gaussian pulses and (ii) when molecular collisions dominate the dephasing process. As was discussed in the introduction, the latter condition represents the case of the homogenously broadened line. Therefore,

FIG. 2.

Time-domain CARS signal obtained from the ∼16 μm diameter fat area located at the center of the mouse tissue for the image shown in Fig. 1(b). The solid green line represents the non-resonant CARS signal obtained in the microscope glass slide that was detected in the same (i.e., backward) direction and under the same other conditions. The dash dotted line represents the best fit to the data obtained by using formulae (2)–(4) and varying the corresponding line parameters (see the text).

FIG. 2.

Time-domain CARS signal obtained from the ∼16 μm diameter fat area located at the center of the mouse tissue for the image shown in Fig. 1(b). The solid green line represents the non-resonant CARS signal obtained in the microscope glass slide that was detected in the same (i.e., backward) direction and under the same other conditions. The dash dotted line represents the best fit to the data obtained by using formulae (2)–(4) and varying the corresponding line parameters (see the text).

Close modal
(4)

where h(t) is the Heaviside step function, Aj is the Raman line component amplitude, T2j is the component's dephasing time, and Δωj is the component's shift from the reference frequency (e.g., from 12)). By varying the above parameters, we can find the best fit to our experimental data. For the vibrational modes in the vicinity of 12) ≈ 1072 cm−1, the best fit corresponded to the presence of two vibration lines with a frequency difference of Δ12=Δω1Δω2 = 28.7 cm−1, dephasing times of 2.6 and 1.7 ps, and the amplitude ratio of A1/A2 = 19:5 respectively. The dephasing times (T2j) obtained from our measurements suggest, if we apply formula (1), that the two homogenously broadened vibrations have linewidths of Δν1=4.1 cm−1 and Δν2 = 6.3 cm−1. Some comparison can be made with spontaneous Raman data available for fats.14,15 We did not find any data on the relevant case that is obtained using a coherent frequency-domain technique. Spontaneous Raman spectroscopy of adipose tissue in mice has shown two not well resolved C-C bending vibrations within the ∼1060–1120 cm−1 range sitting on a broad shoulder.15 The line separation within the doublet at around 1080 cm−1 is not reported and could not be inferred from the data. The two strongly overlapping and merging lines show the combined width of about 25 cm−1 which is about the separation Δ12 that we found using our data. Thus, our results represent the only measurement of the linewidths and the spectral difference for the C-C vibrations in fat and clearly demonstrate the power of the time-domain method. Another feature that follows from our data is that the individual components with the doublet have different linewidths.

We next targeted the higher-frequency and stronger line at ∼1265–1275 cm1, assigned as a =C-H bending vibration, to get a better comparison with available spontaneous Raman studies since the line is better resolved in them. Figure 3 shows the transient signal when Raman active vibrations at a frequency shift of around ∼1270 cm1 were excited and probed within the fat tissue. By fitting the data, using the model described above, we found that there are two closely spaced vibration modes at 1272 cm1 with the frequency difference of Δ12=48.5 cm1, dephasing times of 550 fs (Δν1=19.3 cm1) and 670 fs (Δν1=15.8 cm1), and the amplitude ratio of 33:13. The study reported in Ref. 15 identifies this C-H bending doublet positioned at 1264 cm1 and 1301 cm1, resulting in a frequency spacing of 35–40 cm1 with linewidths that could not be obtained from the data. The doublet line frequency differences show some agreement with the one detected in our experiments. Overall, none of the Raman studies that we found on fatty acids, proteins, and DNA16 provided explicit line bandwidths. This is presumably due to the limited (∼3–7 cm1) spectral resolutions and low scattering signals. Thus, we find our work to be the only report to reveal precise information on line separations and linewidths.

FIG. 3.

Time-domain CARS signal obtained from the mouse tissue area identified as a fat in the vicinity of the Raman frequency shift of ≈1270 cm−1. The solid line represents the best fit to the data obtained by using formulae (2)–(4) and varying the corresponding line parameters (see the text).

FIG. 3.

Time-domain CARS signal obtained from the mouse tissue area identified as a fat in the vicinity of the Raman frequency shift of ≈1270 cm−1. The solid line represents the best fit to the data obtained by using formulae (2)–(4) and varying the corresponding line parameters (see the text).

Close modal

We have compared our results in mouse fat with identical time-domain CARS measurements that we performed in olive oil. Oils and lipids in fats have a similar molecular composition and thus should have similar Raman active vibrational spectra. Raman active lines corresponding to C-C stretching vibration at ∼1070 cm1 and scissoring (C-H) modes at 1267 cm1 (Ref. 17) were targeted. The corresponding results are shown in Figs. 4(a) and 4(b). Since the data quality had been substantially better, we were able to determine the parameters (see the figure caption) more precisely. We point out again that a comprehensive comparison with data obtained by frequency-domain methods could not be performed since linewidth data were not available for the two modes in oil either. In general, from our experiments, fairly good agreement is found between fat and oil data as the concerned linewidth and spectral separation parameters. However, the small differences, above the spectral resolution, are still noticeable. More detailed studies are needed, especially for different types of oils and fatty acids, in order to come up with a credible explanation for the detected differences. If we turn to the data for mouse fat again, one can see that there is a factor of 3–4 difference in linewidths for the targeted C-C and =C-H bending vibrations. We attribute this to the differences in character and lengths of the bonds, and we think that those play a larger role in determining the dephasing times (damping rates and linewidth) for the vibrations compared to the heterogenous molecular environment.

FIG. 4.

(a) and (b). Time-domain CARS signals (open circles) obtained from a drop of olive oil. The Raman active vibrations near (a) ≈1070 cm−1 and (b) 1265 cm−1 were targeted and probed. The solid line represents the best fit to the data obtained using formulae (2)–(4) with the following parameters: (a) Δν1=3.7cm1, Δν2=5.6cm1, Δ12=23cm1, A1/A2 = 13/3; (b) Δν1=21.6cm1, Δν2=17.5cm1, Δ12=41.4cm1, and A1/A2 = 11/3.

FIG. 4.

(a) and (b). Time-domain CARS signals (open circles) obtained from a drop of olive oil. The Raman active vibrations near (a) ≈1070 cm−1 and (b) 1265 cm−1 were targeted and probed. The solid line represents the best fit to the data obtained using formulae (2)–(4) with the following parameters: (a) Δν1=3.7cm1, Δν2=5.6cm1, Δ12=23cm1, A1/A2 = 13/3; (b) Δν1=21.6cm1, Δν2=17.5cm1, Δ12=41.4cm1, and A1/A2 = 11/3.

Close modal

In conclusion, we reported on implementation of spectroscopic imaging and characterization approaches based on time-resolved version of CARS. We can identify tissue constituents and measure dephasing times for the associated vibrational modes. We show that the time-domain nonlinear microscopy of tissue delivers much more precise information on molecular fingerprints of the tissue constituents. Relating this type of information to diagnostics of diseases will be the task of major importance for future efforts.

Funding from NSF (DBI-1355307) is greatly appreciated.

1.
W.
Denk
,
J. H.
Strickler
, and
W. W.
Webb
,
Science
248
,
73
(
1990
).
2.
P. J.
Campagnola
and
L. M.
Leow
,
Nat. Biotechnol.
21
,
1356
(
2003
).
3.
M.
Zimmerley
,
P.
Mahou
,
D.
Débarre
,
M-C.
Schanne-Klein
, and
E.
Beaurepaire
,
Phys. Rev. X
3
,
011002
(
2013
).
4.
C. W.
Freudiger
,
W.
Min
,
B. G.
Saar
,
S.
Lu
,
G. R.
Holtom
,
C.
He
,
J. C.
Tsai
,
J. X.
Kang
, and
X. S.
Xie
,
Science
322
,
1857
(
2008
).
5.
C. L.
Evans
,
E. O.
Potma
,
M.
Puoris'haag
,
D.
Cote
,
C. P.
Lin
, and
X. S.
Xie
,
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.
102
,
16807
(
2005
).
6.
C. P.
Pfeffer
,
B. R.
Olsen
,
F.
Ganikhanov
, and
F.
Légaré
,
J. Struct. Biol.
164
,
140
(
2008
).
7.
W.
Liu
,
H.
Wang
,
J.
Du
, and
C.
Jing
,
Biosens. Bioelectron.
97
,
70
(
2017
).
8.
K.
Eberhardt
,
C.
Beleites
,
S.
Marthandan
,
C.
Matthäus
,
S.
Diekmann
, and
J.
Popp
,
Anal. Chem.
89
,
2937
(
2017
).
9.
K.
Tanabe
and
J.
Hiraishi
,
J. Raman Spectrosc.
12
,
274
(
1982
).
10.
A.
Card
,
M.
Mokim
, and
F.
Ganikhanov
,
AIP Adv.
6
,
025115
(
2016
).
11.
A.
Volkmer
,
L.
Book
, and
S. X.
Xie
,
Appl. Phys. Lett.
80
,
1505
(
2002
).
12.
J. D.
Rowley
,
S.
Yang
, and
F.
Ganikhanov
,
J. Opt. Soc. Am. B
28
,
1026
(
2011
).
13.
A.
Laubereau
and
W.
Kaiser
,
Rev. Mod. Phys.
50
,
607
(
1978
).
15.
P.
Meksiarun
,
B. B.
Andriana
,
H.
Matsuyoshi
, and
H.
Sato
,
Sci. Rep.
6
,
37068
(
2016
).
16.
G. J.
Thomas
,
Annu. Rev. Biophys. Biomol. Struct.
28
,
1
(
1999
).
17.
R.
Korifi
,
Y.
Le Dreau
,
J.
Molinet
,
J.
Artaud
, and
N.
Dupuy
,
J. Raman Spectrosc.
42
,
1540
(
2011
).